Concrete Proof that Evolutionists DO NOT CARE ABOUT EVIDENCE
79% of evolutionary biologists believe in free-will, thereby proving that biologists do not care about evidence and that the reason why they believe in evolution has nothing to do with evidence.
A fool (atheist) might think in their mind how could this be?
It’s simple: If you go strictly by evidence you would be more certain that free-will is non-existent than you would be that evolution is true.
Atheist biologists aren’t going by evidence, that’s why they have no issue with denying repeatable experiments and direct observations telling us there’s no free-will but have an issue with people denying assumptions in evolution that are impossible to experimentally verify as accurate, LOL!
If you’re willing to deny repeatable experiments and direct observations (the most concrete form of evidence in science) to believe in free-will then you should be willing to deny any type of evidence in science.
On the other hand if you’re willing to believe in evolution (relies on many assumptions that are impossible to experimentally verify as accurate) then you should be willing to believe in anything supported by repeatable experiments and direct observation.
But we see that this isn’t the case, thereby proving that evolutionary biologists do not really care about evidence.
The reason why evolutionary biologists believe in evolution is because they are strongly biased towards evolution, not because of evidence. If evidence was important to them they would be much more certain that free-will is non-existent than they would be that evolution is true.
There aren’t any evolutionary biologists that value evidence or go strictly by evidence.
You have to realize the truth that not one atheist evolutionist in all of the entire world actually cares about or values evidence, they are just biased towards evolution.
Most biologists who believe in free-will don’t even realize that non-determinism and disorder would falsify evolution, lol (most free-will believers attack determinism).
“The Problem of Free-Will” argument is usually used against religion so of course the atheist-controlled media won’t come out to attack free-will believers like how they’ve attacked Creationists.
Have you ever heard even one time a Professor getting fired for believing in free-will or teaching that free-will could exist? I haven’t.
On the other hand if a Professor merely questions or criticizes evolution they could get fired or heavily persecuted, why is this?
Michael Egnor, a neurosurgeon was heavily criticized for merely saying that studying evolution was useless (not even criticizing evolution or saying that it’s false). Of course Egnor is correct, evolution has very few real-world applications. When you’re studying neurosurgery and other things it doesn’t matter if humans evolved from an ape-like ancestor, or Neanderthals, or were genetically engineered by aliens, or Created, what matters is how the brain works here and how.
So indeed studying evolution would be useless…can you believe someone can get that much trouble for saying that but if they were to say something like studying ancient history is useless for electrical engineers nothing would happen would to them? It shows you how well-controlled the atheist-controlled media is.
I’ve read lots of unscientific junk in peer-reviewed journals, apparently you’re allowed to be unscientific if you’re not criticizing evolution. For instance people are allowed to criticize the evidence telling us there’s no free-will with all types of unscientific junk, and nothing happens to them, they don’t get attacked, they don’t get fired.
The media has no issue with free-will believers or people questioning the scientific evidence telling us that there’s no free-will but has an issue with people questioning the evidence on evolution, why is this? Because the media isn’t going by science or evidence, they’re going by what supports atheism.
The media is ATHEIST-CONTROLLED and can careless about evidence.
The media is atheist-controlled and biased that’s why they have no issue with people questioning the experiments telling us that there’s no free-will, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, or anything else in science but have an issue with people questioning evolution – a crackpot perpetual motion machine idea, because evolution is protected like a religious belief and not treated as another theory open to criticism and scrutiny.
Why should evolution be protected like a religious belief rather than treated as just another scientific theory open to criticism and scrutiny?
It’s the because the media and society is biased and ATHEIST-CONTROLLED. That’s the only rational explanation.
Atheists are always trying to force and impose their ways and their beliefs onto society.
I’ve already proven in my other article that evolution is just nonsense, basically a crackpot theory nearly equivalent to believing in perpetual motion machines.
On anti-science/atheist blog sites like “https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com” they have to pre-approve comments and don’t allow people to question or criticize them, this is because they are anti-science and know that they are wrong.
One of the main principles in science use to be criticism and scrutiny prior to the fools (atheists) taking over science, this is because if a statement really is true it will stand up to any amount of criticism.
Since evolutionists know that they are wrong of course they will try everything in their power to prevent and stop any type of criticism of evolution, perhaps the very weakest theory in all of science history.
Evolutionists can’t handle that their science fiction story called “evolution” is obviously false.
From a strict empiricist point of view only conclusions drawn from repeatable experiments can be regarded as “true”.
We can objectively measure how weak or strong a theory is by how many assumptions it relies on that have been experimentally tested and verified as accurate.
By that measure, evolution has to be very weakest most fragile theory in all of science history!
Summary of the evidence telling us that free-will is non-existent (atheist biologists have no issue with people questioning this evidence yet they have an issue with people questioning the extraordinarily weak evidence supporting evolution which is impossible to experimentally verify as accurate showing their anti-science/atheist nature):
– Libet’s experiment
– Transcranial Magnetic Stimuli experiment
– Reaction Time experiment
– Evidence supporting the neural-correlate explanation (means that neurons make our decisions, no choosing involved)
– The empirical observation that drugs and chemical reactions alter consciousness
– The empirical observation that brain-related injuries can cause permanent changes in behavior and consciousness
– The empirical observation that the brain is a vital organ and must behave in a deterministic way for humans to survive
– The empirical observation that different species have different behaviors varying by their brain size and structure
– Accidental decisions
– Involuntary decisions
– Impossible decisions (eg…someone feels as if they can run 100 mph or reach something too far away)
– Psychology (tells us that human behavior is the result of conditioning, not choices)
– Physics (no model in physics allows for free-will to exist, neither determinism nor non-determinism)
So basically questioning the evidence on free-will is equivalent to questioning science in general.
The problems and gaps in evolution are much much much bigger than the issues with the hypothesis that there is no free-will, humans merely feel as if they can choose when in reality they always uncontrollably act all the time (there’s no issue at all with this hypothesis, it matches into all the data perfectly).
Since 79% of evolutionary biologists believe in free-will we can be 100% certain that they don’t really care about evidence, science, logic, or reasoning.
They believe in evolution just in the same way that someone would believe in a religious idea. They really want to believe in evolution and have to blank out all the evidence telling us that evolution is impossible.
“Evolution” is only true in biologists’ imagination…just like if you show someone a perpetual motion machine diagram they might be able to imagine it working in their minds…but in reality it wouldn’t work, it’s just fantasy and imagination…it’s the same thing with evolution, biologists just imagine it working in their minds, it wouldn’t happen in reality.
Just imagine how much better things would be if people gave up on the “free-will delusion”, you wouldn’t be able to blame anyone, people would instead focus on the scientific causes of negative behavior, it would be really easy to forgive and forget, not hold grudges, let go of anger, and see the true innocence in all beings.
Right now because people really believe in free-will they can’t forgive or forget or not hold grudges…they think in their mind “this person chose to do this, they could’ve done this or that, but they chose not to”.
If instead they believed in science they would instead think in their mind “this person never chose to do this, it happened because of uncontrollable reactions in the person’s body and brain” and it would really really easy to forgive and forget and not hold grudges!
Based on modern science I’ve concluded that I was chosen for a special purpose, and that certain individuals are destined to achieve certain things.
In conclusion: Don’t trust what evolutionary biologists say or believe since they aren’t going by evidence and are basically anti-science clowns.