Skip to content
August 17, 2014 / itsnobody

Top 10 Questions for Atheists – Part II

I have some more questions for the fools (atheists), they are always so foolish (atheistic).

Here are my questions:

#10 –  Why can’t atheists accept the historical consensus on Nazism and religion (that Nazism is either unrelated to or opposed to Christianity) instead of spreading lies debunked by historians?

#9 – Since there’s more scientific evidence contradicting the existence of free-will than there is contradicting the existence of God or supporting evolution, do you have an issue with people who believe in free-will?

#8 – Since abiogenesis lacks evidence and is unfalsifiable, do you have an issue with people who believe in abiogenesis?

#7 – Why can’t atheists accept the historical consensus that Faraday’s Sandemanian religion directly caused him to believe that magnetism, electricity, and light were linked as one which in turn caused James Clerk Maxwell to formulate Maxwell’s Equations (so religion is responsible for modern day electrical technology)?

#6 – Why after more than 6.5 years of this blog post ( http://www.atheistrev.com/2007/11/atheism-and-white-power.html ) being up hasn’t there not been even one anti-racist comment from an atheist there (100% of the comments from atheists support racism or White Nationalism) since it’s a NORMAL atheist blog site?

#5 – Why are 100% of all modern day atheist countries (like Denmark, Sweden, New Zealand, Latvia, Estonia, etc…) extremely racist and nationalist beyond imagination according to the studies done there?

#4 – Why can’t atheists accept that I falsified their popular claim that “atheist nations are peaceful” with examples of violent atheist countries like Estonia and North Korea?

#3 – Why does the atheist community remain silent in opposition towards racism and White Nationalism yet voice their position and speak up on things like gay rights and abortion rights?

#2 – Why aren’t there any atheist blog sites or forums that allow free and open criticism like how I do but instead interpret any type of criticism as “trolling” or something like that (an anti-science stance), since criticism and scrutiny is an extremely important principle in science?

#1 – Why can’t atheists accept the historical consensus that religion directly caused the scientific revolution and that there were no “Dark Ages” as portrayed in the delusional anti-historian atheist media?

The reason why criticism and scrutiny use to be an important principle in science prior to the fools (atheists) taking over is because if a statement really is true it will stand up to any amount of criticism. So the more people question, criticize, and scrutinize things the closer we come towards the truth.

But now that the fools (atheists) are taking over they’re trying to make everything about authority and incredulity, and eliminate criticism all together by interpreting any type of criticism as “trolling” thereby turning science into a pseudo-scientific popularity contest.

Overall, I hope to achieve my goal of getting society to view atheists as subhuman beings as opposed to actual human beings, not partially human, but fully subhuman.

It’s the free market free speech free society, it’s a terrible thing for a Whites-only type of society.

Support socialism, support a Whites-only type of society!

Advertisements

39 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. pixelguy10 / Jul 24 2016 5:45 pm

    10. I do accept it.
    9. Science and free aren’t related. I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here. But I’ll just say that atheist countries are more likely to have attained free-will. China isn’t actually an atheist country. North Korea is, but communism is to blame.
    8. There’s an ad hominem embedded in the foundation of this question. Also, no.
    7. That’s the only example you can give of religion directly causing a scientific breakthrough.
    6. There are multiple anti-racist statements from atheists. Read it again, asshat.
    5. What studies? They let in hundreds of thousands of Muslim immigrants each year, and they want Scandinavia to become Muslim.
    4. Communism’s to blame for North Korea, and Estonia isn’t violent. Those are only two countries anyway. Also, what about the ‘-stan’ countries? Northern Africa? Eh.
    3. We don’t stay silent. Fuck you for calling Scandinavians subhumans. Hey look, I’m speaking up against racism.
    2. There are.
    1. Sorry, there were Dark Ages. It’s like denying the Holocaust.

  2. Dave Wildermuth / May 2 2016 8:26 pm

    10) The consensus is that the Nazis were religious (not necessarily Christian); I do accept that.
    9) No, since I base by beliefs on what evidence supports, not what it contradicts.
    8) There is evidence for abiogenesis.
    7) Because your conclusion’s invalid.
    6) No clue. I’ve personally never read any of those comments.
    5) I am unfamiliar with such studies.
    4) I make no such claim.
    3) They don’t.
    2) There are.
    1) I am unfamiliar with such consensus.

    Thanks!

  3. Anonymous / Jan 19 2016 10:59 am

    Just two things. One, De Ha’s comment bears repeating, “You’ve never actually spent much time talking to Atheists, have you?”.

    And because of that, two: all the rest is either so presumptuous or just plain wrong about what atheists in general think, or insulting and false about entire nations, or just plain bizarre, that:

    “Suffer not the time of fools.”

    applies BIG time.

    Guy: you’re writing a blog because you don’t listen to what others have to say. You have strong but wild and uncontrolled thoughts and beliefs that you desperately need to get out, and this blog is your vehicle for doing that. But it’s not a place for a dialog, is it ? You don’t listen to or actual ever change your opinions based on responses, do you ? There’s no dialog, is there ?

    In this dialog, that’s my question for you. Do you listen ?

  4. De Ha / Dec 11 2015 3:08 am

    #10 – Why can’t atheists accept the historical consensus on Nazism and religion (that Nazism is either unrelated to or opposed to Christianity) instead of spreading lies debunked by historians?

    Hitler was a Christian.

    #9 – Since there’s more scientific evidence contradicting the existence of free-will than there is contradicting the existence of God or supporting evolution, do you have an issue with people who believe in free-will?

    I get really bored when Theists switch to philosophy in the middle of a Scientific debate.

    #8 – Since abiogenesis lacks evidence and is unfalsifiable, do you have an issue with people who believe in abiogenesis?

    What? Also, bullshit.

    #7 – Why can’t atheists accept the historical consensus that Faraday’s Sandemanian religion directly caused him to believe that magnetism, electricity, and light were linked as one which in turn caused James Clerk Maxwell to formulate Maxwell’s Equations (so religion is responsible for modern day electrical technology)?

    What?

    #6 – Why after more than 6.5 years of this blog post being up hasn’t there not been even one anti-racist comment from an atheist there (100% of the comments from atheists support racism or White Nationalism) since it’s a NORMAL atheist blog site?

    You’re a liar! That is NOT a normal Atheist blog! Hell, you don’t even have to stop being an idiot who thinks in Cliches to know most of us are Liberals or Libertarians.

    #5 – Why are 100% of all modern day atheist countries (like Denmark, Sweden, New Zealand, Latvia, Estonia, etc…) extremely racist and nationalist beyond imagination according to the studies done there?

    You don’t even see the irony of calling someone “racist” based entirely on where they were born, do you? Also, New Zealan? Nationalist? Come on! They wish they were us, and we have NO patriotism whatsoever. Our complete lack of national pride is the main thing that makes me proud to be Australian.

    #4 – Why can’t atheists accept that I falsified their popular claim that “atheist nations are peaceful” with examples of violent atheist countries like Estonia and North Korea?

    That’s communism not Atheism you fuckwit. Secular DEMOCRACIES are peacefull.

    #3 – Why does the atheist community remain silent in opposition towards racism and White Nationalism yet voice their position and speak up on things like gay rights and abortion rights?

    You’ve never actually spent much time talking to Atheists, have you?

    #2 – Why aren’t there any atheist blog sites or forums that allow free and open criticism like how I do but instead interpret any type of criticism as “trolling” or something like that (an anti-science stance), since criticism and scrutiny is an extremely important principle in science?
    Tell me, have you, in fact, ben banned, or were you just a whiny little pussy who interperets criticism and insults as “an attempt to silence me”?

    #1 – Why can’t atheists accept the historical consensus that religion directly caused the scientific revolution and that there were no “Dark Ages” as portrayed in the delusional anti-historian atheist media

    I don’t think “historical consensus” means what you think it means.

  5. Yule / May 11 2015 5:32 am

    Atheists have abandoned common sense and logical thinking a long time ago and the worst part is they cannot even see how illogical and stupid their own arguments are let alone atheism. They’re blind delusional fools.

  6. Yule / May 11 2015 5:23 am

    I tip my cap to you sir. Perfectly argued and proven. Keep up the good work.

  7. pixelguy10 / Sep 15 2014 5:09 pm

    Calling atheists subhuman. #1 Biological proof is required to say that. #2 THAT IS HATE SPEECH, NOT QUESTIONING.

    • itsnobody / Sep 22 2014 6:36 pm

      Don’t be foolish.

      Only a very small part of the post mentioned atheists as subhuman beings, the majority of this post is just valid questions.

      I labeled atheists as subhuman beings because they refuse to oppose racism and nationalism thereby causing racism/nationalism to rise.

      I said that if the atheist community comes out to oppose racism and nationalism and voice their position like what they do on things like gay rights and abortion rights that I would consider atheists as human as opposed to subhuman.

      But it looks like that would never happen so it’s just better for society to view atheists as fully subhuman.

      Any atheist could prove me wrong by opposing racism and nationalism but instead they don’t, they instead focus on making atheists look good or Theists bad and stopping people from criticizing racist atheists lol.

      If any atheist is reading this then honestly I hope that a natural disaster kills you off with all the life in you gone and I view you as fully subhuman. Seriously, honestly, that’s how I feel.

      I pressured and begged atheists to oppose racism but they never will, just look at the comments on that blog site I linked to.

      It’s been almost 7 years since that blog post was made and 100% of the comments on that site from atheists support white nationalism and racism.

      Can you believe that not even ONE atheist in that near 7 year time period commented in to oppose racism?

      Remember it’s just a normal atheist fan site, not supposed to be a racist site.

      After I brought it up and pressured atheists to prove me wrong still no opposition towards racism.

      Atheists are disgusting people.

      Definitely a dog is a higher form of life than an atheist.

      Why do you want me to stop criticizing atheists for being racist for? Because you want the racism to continue and thrive?

      Just imagine how great it must feel to be both a racist and an atheist, no one opposes you plus the entire atheist community is dedicated to stopping people from opposing you.

      Atheists know that criticizing racism causes racism to go down so they’re trying to stop all criticism of racist atheists. Atheists are basically ensuring a racist/nationalist society.

      Nothing is preventing atheists from opposing racism, so I think it’s a good thing to view atheists as fully subhuman unless they oppose racism.

      Come come view an atheist as subhuman!

      • Anonymous / Sep 23 2014 5:09 pm

        If you hope all atheists are wiped out, as in CHILDREN, and BUDHISTS, than you can’t consider yourself a tolerant, kind, or intelligent human being.
        LABELING ATHEISTS AS SUBHUMAN is hate speech, you can’t say you aren’t harsh.
        And if atheists are dumber than dogs, wouldn’t that mean that dogs could discover polonium and radium and the DNA structure? Hmm you bigot?
        Labeling is the biggest part of bullying. SO YOU’RE BULLYING.
        And I don’t see you protesting racism, just you saying atheists are subhuman because they don’t oppose racism.
        Your as stupid as a flat earther, I wouldn’t be surprised if you were one.
        You can’t say you are a kind person.
        You hate atheists as much as you think atheists hate other races. You can’t no to that.
        Your afraid to explain your personal life so when anyone makes fun of your personal life that you never talk about because you have messed up life.

      • itsnobody / Sep 28 2014 8:31 pm

        How foolish ( atheistic ) it is to breakdown and cry like a typical atheist just because I label every single atheist as subhuman beings because they refuse to oppose racism.

        If the atheist community comes out to oppose racism I would consider them to be human.

        But they’ve never done so even after I repeatedly urged them to.

        Instead they’ve responded by agreeing with and supporting racism or trying everything in their power to stop people from criticizing racist atheists (mostly by trying to make atheists look good or Theists look bad or claiming that it’s hate speech lol).

        You would never accuse racists or Nazis or holocaust deniers of bullying or using hate speech would you? You instead accuse me of bullying and hate speech because you really want racism and nationalism to thrive on and on.

        Racist atheists ALL know that they have the ENTIRE atheist community on their side stopping people from criticizing and opposing them.

        I believe that viewing atheists as subhuman beings until they oppose racism makes me more tolerant and kind than those that refuse to oppose racism.

        Truthfully I hope that your atheist kind dies off since they refuse to oppose racism.

        What’s wrong with it? Why do you fools (atheists) interpret it as hate speech or bullying for but not label atheists ridiculing and attacking religion or racist or Nazi speech as hate speech or bullying for? LOL.

        Atheists never discovered anything except for things that came by luck and chance that anyone would have discovered.

        James D. Watson made his racist comments on how evolution undeniably supports racism and the atheist community unanimously agrees.

        James D. Watson and Crick initially guessed the wrong single helical structure and were afraid that others like Linus Pauling would discover the DNA structure before them since it’s something that anyone would have discovered. Their discovery was just a guess that anyone would have made.

        As for flat Earthers it’s just popular myth that the Christians thought that the Earth was flat lol. Most Christian scholars believed in the spherical Earth idea.

        The ones who really believed in the flat Earth were the Chinese until the 17th century when Jesuit preist astronomers introduced the spherical Earth idea to them.

        The historical consensus is that religion directly caused the scientific revolution and Maxwell’s Equations.

        The garbage on cartoon shows and the atheist-controlled media about the “Dark Ages” has been thoroughly debunked by historians.

        The reason why I don’t discuss my personal life is because it’s irrelevant to every point I’ve made. Throwing personal attacks at me doesn’t refute anything I’ve said.

        I hope atheists die off specifically because they cause racism and nationalism to thrive.

        Everything I’ve said is true which is why all you fools (atheists) do is just respond with personal attacks and claiming that everything is hate speech and bullying LOL.

        100% of all atheist countries are racist or nationalist and it’s specifically because of the atheist population as I’ve proven in my other articles.

        Everything I’ve said is true.

        Come come view atheists as subhuman beings!

        Dogs, cats, and other domestic animals are higher forms of life to me than atheists are.

      • pixelguy10 / Oct 23 2014 10:40 am

        An organization somewhat like KKK but spreading hate about atheists known as “The intolerance” owned by itsnobody. He acts like viewing atheists as subhuman is like preventing global warming but really it’s like being racist. In the 1700s people said african americans were 5/8 human. Everyone knows that is biologically stupid. They are that way because of adaptation in the hot sun. Itsnobody is acting like a slave owner saying that atheists are subhuman.

      • pixelguy10 / Nov 13 2014 4:34 pm

        intolerant
        [in-tol-er-uh nt] Spell Syllables
        Synonyms Examples Word Origin
        adjective
        1.
        not tolerating or respecting beliefs, opinions, usages, manners, etc., different from one’s own, as in political or religious matters; bigoted.
        2.
        unable or unwilling to tolerate or endure (usually followed by of):
        intolerant of very hot weather.
        3. Itsnobody
        noun
        4.
        an intolerant person; bigot.

  8. Chris P / Aug 30 2014 12:31 am

    Is this all you can do after all this time – throw rocks at atheists. You are still completely nuts. Why haven’t you won a Nobel prize for proving the existence of God yet? You present yourself as a total smart ass but have failed to convince anybody except the occasional delusional religious nut that passes by. You continue to use the same old stupid tropes about Hitler and Pol Pot and misrepresent what evolution means.

    Don’t you a have real job yet? When are to reveal who you are too? Or are you scared that people will then know who the real dolt is and never hire you.

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:04 am

      How foolish (atheistic).

      Another response from a fool (atheist) that’s merely a personal attack ad hominem.

      Why can’t the fools (atheists) answer my questions or at least try to say something rather than just throwing personal attacks?

      I guess none of the fools (atheists) are willing to answer any of the questions I posed.

      • Whateverman / Sep 7 2014 4:43 pm

        I’ll bet your Mom is real proud of you. She’d probably tell you, too, if only you came out of her basement once in a while…

      • itsnobody / Sep 8 2014 3:48 pm

        Don’t be foolish (atheistic).

        Can’t you fools do anything besides throw personal attacks?

        If I threw personal attacks at you I would just make you breakdown and cry like the little pussy that you are and the fools would say it’s trolling or hate speech or whatever

        It’s always a great laugh to see an atheist in desperation!

      • Yule / May 11 2015 5:33 am

        Atheists have abandoned common sense and logical thinking a long time ago and the worst part is they cannot even see how illogical and stupid their own arguments are let alone atheism. They’re blind delusional fools.

  9. itsnobody / Aug 19 2014 11:25 pm

    I expected at least one fool (atheist) to answer my questions, instead they just breakdown and cry in desperation.

    Foolish (atheistic).

    Suggestion for the fools (atheists): Give up, go home, ignore the whole situation and block everything out. Go back to those atheist forums that don’t allow criticism and scrutiny where atheists can agree with each other and interpret any criticism as “trolling” like typical anti-science fans. You can have an agreeing-contest…..”I agree, do you agree? If someone disagrees it should be interpreted as trolling or hate speech, let’s all agree with each other”.

    Foolish (atheistic).

    Charles Babbage said “Perhaps it would be better for science, that all criticism should be avowed.” because if a statement really is true it will stand up to any amount of criticism.

    The more people question, criticize, and scrutinize things the closer we come towards the truth. But the fools (atheists) are trying to throw that away, throwing us into darkness, away from the truth.

    Now words from Michael Faraday, the super-religious Sandemanian who’s Sandemanian religion directly caused arguably the biggest breakthrough in ALL of science history:

    Speculations? I have none. I am resting on certainties. I know whom I have believed and am persuaded that He is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day. – Michael Faraday, April 1896

    There’s no way James Clerk Maxwell would’ve even attempted to link magnetism, electricity, and light together as one without Faraday’s religion. Anyone who understands the history of science would know how laughable and ridiculous that idea was during Faraday’s time. It was religion that caused Faraday to believe that all things were unified as one which in turn directly caused Maxwell’s equations.

    The anti-historian atheist-controlled media has tried to suppress this undeniable truth.

    Why has the atheist-controlled media spread so many lies?

    • Anonymous / Aug 27 2014 9:05 am

      Look what happened to Luigi Galvani who pioneered bioelectricity. Because of his religious beliefs he and many other brilliant christian scientists were dismissed from secular universities by Napoleon. Atheists who only believe what they see can’t understand easily magnetic fields , viruses , psychology etc…. They’re much too materialistic too understand what’s an abstraction. 

    • pixelguy10 / Sep 13 2014 6:06 pm

      you are throwing plenty of personal attacks, itsnobody.

      • itsnobody / Sep 22 2014 6:22 pm

        No Mr.Fool you just interpret any type of criticism as personal attacks but then when atheists throw personal attacks at me you don’t care about it lol.

      • pixelguy10 / Oct 23 2014 10:45 am

        When are you gonna stop with the “Mr.Fool” that’s a baby phrase.
        And when are you gonna leave your little dorm and go into the real world? No have no idea what a personal attack is do you? Ask your parent why they didn’t work hard to raise you.

  10. pixelguy10 / Aug 18 2014 10:05 am

    Lol, itsnobody is basically saying:
    Hate speech and bullying should be allowed! Atheists deserve to be tortured! Mutilated! Thrown in jail!
    Bullied! We all know the dumb should be killed!
    Yep, pretty much.

    • itsnobody / Aug 19 2014 10:55 pm

      No Mr.Fool.

      I’m saying that criticism and scrutiny should be allowed because if a statement really is true it will stand up to any amount of criticism.

      Why you don’t fools (atheists) ever “interpret” it as “hate speech” or “bullying” if someone ridicules or attacks religion, can you fools (atheists) answer that question?

      Your hate speech/bullying/trolling crap is just a way of preventing and stopping criticism, a typical anti-science/atheist stance.

      The fools (atheists) simply want a world where people are allowed to make fun of and ridicule religion, but not allowed to question or criticize atheists, and are forced to agree with atheists.

      Well if you know that you’re wrong just do what the fools (atheists) do – breakdown and interpret any type of criticism as “hate speech”, “bullying”, or “trolling”.

      You fools (atheists) always breakdown and cry whenever criticized, but if someone were to ridicule and attack religion you wouldn’t “interpret” it as trolling/bullying/hate speech.

      Foolish (atheistic).

      Why don’t you fools (atheists) go and post about how it’s “hate speech” and “bullying” on blog sites and YouTube videos that ridicule and attack religion, fool (atheist)?

      My questions are all perfectly valid, fool (atheist).

      I want things to always remain free and open, so people can question, criticize, and scrutinize anything that I say as much as they want unlike the fools (atheists) who always breakdown in desperation and can’t handle any criticism.

      I guess the fools (atheists) have finally met their match, me.

      • pixelguy10 / Sep 15 2014 5:06 pm

        I think saying atheists deserve to be made fun of is more of hate speech and bullying than questioning.

        And since I don’t say theists deserve to be made fun of, that makes me anti-science?
        What a display of logic!!!

      • itsnobody / Sep 22 2014 6:25 pm

        How is it hate speech or bullying dumbass why don’t you fools explain yourselves?

        Anti-science means opposition to science and one of the main principles in science is criticism and scrutiny….so if you want me to stop criticizing atheistic arguments by subjectively interpreting criticism as hate speech then you’re anti-science.

        How laughable that the fools (atheists) interpret any criticism of atheists or atheistic arguments as hate speech and bullying but would never ever ever interpret ridiculing and attacking religion as hate speech or bullying LOL.

        Foolish (atheistic).

      • pixelguy10 / Oct 23 2014 10:43 am

        When we say you are bullying we are talking about “Atheists ruin everything they touch” “Atheists are subhuman” “Atheists can’t do anything”. How many times do I have to say that? Nobody hates on you because of the reasons, well, they think your stupid and pity you because of the reasons, but they hate you and accuse you because of the “fool (atheist)” crap. Itsnobody.wordpress.com. Where people of all religions come to hate on you for good reason.

      • pixelguy10 / Nov 13 2014 4:36 pm

        intolerant
        [in-tol-er-uh nt] Spell Syllables
        Synonyms Examples Word Origin
        adjective
        1.
        not tolerating or respecting beliefs, opinions, usages, manners, etc., different from one’s own, as in political or religious matters; bigoted.
        2.
        unable or unwilling to tolerate or endure (usually followed by of):
        intolerant of very hot weather.
        noun
        3.
        an intolerant person; bigot.

      • pixelguy10 / Jul 30 2015 10:47 pm

        Also, you say “How is it hate speech of bullying DUMBASS” Wow, you definitely have a side that hates yourself.

  11. pixelguy10 / Aug 18 2014 10:02 am

    estonia and north korea are atheistic countries. Let’s not forget Iraq and Afghanistan are theistic countries!

    • North Korea isn't Nazi Germany — in some ways, it's worse / Aug 18 2014 4:49 pm

       “At the end of the Second World War so many people said, ‘If only we had known, if only we had known the wrongs that were done in the countries of the hostile forces,'” Kirby said at a press conference on Monday. The North Korean human rights violations are “strikingly similar” to the atrocities committed by the Nazis, he added. “There will be no excusing the failure of action because we didn’t know — we do know.”

      To illustrate the comparison, Kirby told reporters about a former prisoner who testified that one of his duties at the North Korean camp was burning the bodies of prisoners who died of starvation, then hauling the ashes and unburned body parts to fields, where they were used as crop fertilizer.
      […]
      For one thing, most of North Korea’s roughly 25 million inhabitants are chronically hungry, malnourished, or straight-out starving. The citizens of wartime Germany faced hardships and shortages, but nothing near the same levels North Koreans routinely deal with, especially in times of crop failure.

      The other big differences are longevity and technology. Hitler’s propaganda, indoctrination, and surveillance techniques were weak or primitive compared with the Big Brother apparatus the Kim family and its retainers have developed over the past six decades. WWII-era Germans didn’t have press freedoms or freedom of expression or congregation or exercise of religion, but most of them — targeted groups obviously excluded — were encouraged to go about their business, making money (and wartime goods and munitions) for the fatherland.

       

      http://theweek.com/article/index/256523/north-korea-isnt-nazi-germany-mdash-in-some-ways-its-worse

    • itsnobody / Aug 19 2014 10:52 pm

      What a foolish (atheistic) response.

      Let’s not forget that Austria, Italy, Switzerland and the other religious Western European countries have extremely extremely low murder rates, fool (atheist).

      • pixelguy10 / Sep 11 2014 7:18 am

        *ahem* One of the most atheistic countries in the world is THE MOST PEACEFUL country in the world. Tibet. No one would ever dare to hurt a fly there.
        OWNED

      • itsnobody / Sep 22 2014 6:53 pm

        Don’t be foolish ( atheistic ).

        North Korea and Estonia are more atheist than Tibet is dumbass.

        Also I can’t find reliable statistics on crime in Tibet.

        Switzerland and Austria (the most religious Western countries) have lower murder rates.

      • pixelguy10 / Oct 23 2014 10:36 am

        When have you ever NOT been intolerant?

      • pixelguy10 / Nov 13 2014 4:32 pm

        The crimerate is nearly 0 but other countries try to destroy Tibet because of their atheistic beliefs.

      • Phoenix / Dec 1 2014 2:46 am

        @pixelguy10
        The crimerate is nearly 0 but other countries try to destroy Tibet because of their atheistic beliefs//

        First of all,Tibet is not atheistic.It’s very much a religious country with all the common religious traditions and institutions.
        Secondly,The “other countries” trying to destroy Tibet is being perpetrated by Atheist China.
        Geez,get your facts straight already.

        http://freetibet.org/about/religion

  12. Atheism in Cambodia / Aug 18 2014 8:46 am

    Two nice and tolerant atheists who certainly hate the Crusades and the Inquisition were recently sentenced to life imprisonment for their brilliant participation in the progress of mankind.
    Nuon Chea, 88 years old, the Khmer Rouge’s chief ideologue and former deputy to atheist leader Pol Pot, and 83-year-old Khieu Samphan, the former head of state, were found guilty of crimes against humanity. As usual , theses humanist atheists directing mass murder, political and religious persecution and many other atrocities related to the mass eviction of city-dwellers and executions of enemy soldiers.
    During the reign of Pol Pot , slavery merely was restored in Cambodia ; city dwellers were deported to the countryside to work in collective farms and forced labour projects. Slavery , malnutrition, mistreatment , executions have killed about 2 million Cambodians. Mass executions were performed in sites known as the Killing Fields, and the victims were buried in mass graves in the typical atheistic traditions. These atheistic gentlemen – who certainly inspired the Taliban – submitted their victims to very refined treatments such as sexual humiliations , exposure in the jungle to the sun and to insects and wild animals and even murdered many of them by using hammers, axe handles, spades or sharpened bamboo sticks. 
    At least atheists do not burn hundreds of witches … They only murdered 1/3 of Cambodians.

    In every continent , atheists were so brilliantly involved in the progress of mankind that we now know why the atheists have good reasons to hate Christianity !

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: