Skip to content
May 10, 2013 / itsnobody

Socialism – The best choice for White Nationalists, racists, and Nazis

A pure socialist society with no market is the best form of government for a White Nationalist/Nazi/Whites-only type of society. Racism/White Nationalism/Nazism all fits in perfectly with far-left liberal socialism.

The main reason why liberal atheists support socialism is specifically because they agree with and support racism.

How racists benefit from socialism:
No need for immigration and no benefit from immigration

With a socialist form of government since there is no market, there’s no need for immigration, and no benefit from immigration. The free market system actually grows and benefits from immigration, in many cases even from illegal immigration.

This is probably the main reason that a socialist form of government is the best for White Nationalists/atheists/Nazis.

Prevents non-whites from moving to White countries

The free market system creates jobs and many companies bring in immigrant workers. With socialism there won’t be any jobs available for immigrant workers.

Finding jobs in states with socialist laws is much more difficult than in states that have more of a free market system.

Socialism in other countries also benefits White Nationalists because if the people in other countries had socialism they would have no need to move to Western countries.

Since they wouldn’t have any need to move to Western countries there would be very few non-white immigrants attempting to go to Western countries.

No benefit from serving non-white customers, no one can boycott

In a free market system, companies benefit by serving any customer regardless of race since they would gain more profits. With a socialist form of government, there is no benefit from serving non-whites.

This of course is perfect for a Whites-only type of society.

Say for instance there’s a socialist store, since everything is free, and no one can boycott anything the socialist store can just serve White customers alone (ignoring anyone else) without having to worry about their company falling under or anything.

The same with socialized medicine. In liberal atheist countries like Sweden socialized medicine makes racial discrimination extremely easy. They don’t have to serve non-whites, and in many cases serving non-whites would hurt their country. Socialized medicine allows them to serve their own kind first, and just ignore others.

Just look at the areas where there’s a free market, like restaurants, attractions, etc…they attract non-whites and companies gain money from serving non-white customers. With socialism you can prevent non-whites from going outside.

Hate speech laws to prevent people from criticizing racists

With hate speech laws no one can criticize you for being racist. You can interpret any type of criticism as “hate speech” and that would include criticizing racists.

“Free speech” or allowing people to criticize others for being racist makes it very difficult for racists. Someone’s whole family name could just go down as racist if someone found out that they were racist and it would look really bad for them. So free speech only makes private secretive racist comments acceptable.

With hate speech laws people can be as racist as they want knowing that no one is allowed to criticize them for being racist.

Stops non-whites and low IQ groups from doing certain jobs

With socialism the government determines your ability (they would most likely use IQ testing or some other tests to determine your ability) and you would only be allowed to do jobs that’s within your ability.

This means if your dream is to be an astronaut but the socialist government says you’re only capable of working as a janitor, garbage man, or lawn mower then that’s all that you can do.

This of course is perfect for a Whites-only type of society.

In a free market free society there are all types of high paying jobs available that don’t require much IQ type intelligence. In a free market system money is power so this means that all types of low IQ people could have lots of power.

Any policy that makes things hard for businesses is better for a Whites-only type of society

The more regulations and the harder it is for companies to setup, the better it is for a Whites-only type of society. Most liberal states have extremely low non-white populations for this reason already.

When companies setup they almost always bring in non-white employees and non-white customers, making a Whites-only type of society impossible.

So any policy, regulation, law, etc…that makes things difficult for companies, causes them to go out of business, or not setup works to automatically preserve a Whites-only type of society.

This includes policies that supposedly help out minorities like minimum wage. States that set the minimum wage very high automatically prevent companies from setting up there or cause them to go out of business or hire less employees which in turn causes them to not bring in non-white employees and customers.

So if you really want to live in a Whites-only type of society support any policy, regulation, or law that makes it hard for businesses!

In Conclusion:
– A socialist government is perfect for a Whites-only White Nationalist type of government
– A free market free society is perhaps the worst thing for a Whites-only type of society
– Liberal atheists all know that socialism is better for a Whites-only type of society and racism, that’s why they support socialism

Advertisements

17 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Obama sex toy / Oct 29 2016 7:54 pm

    “With hate speech laws no one can criticize you for being racist. You can interpret any type of criticism as “hate speech” and that would include criticizing racists.”

    What the fuck? racism is hate speech, so it’s illegal to be racist if hate speech is illegal and as such there is no need to protect criticism of racism.

    This kind of circular reasoning is common in your posts – the premises of your arguments are just as much in need of proof or evidence as the conclusion, and as a consequence the argument fails to persuade.. Let’s face it, if hate speech was illegal, your blog would be illegal.

    “With socialism the government determines your ability (they would most likely use IQ testing or some other tests to determine your ability) and you would only be allowed to do jobs that’s within your ability.

    This means if your dream is to be an astronaut but the socialist government says you’re only capable of working as a janitor, garbage man, or lawn mower then that’s all that you can do.”

    No, that isn’t what socialism means. Here’s the actual dictionary definition from the OED:
    “A political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.”

    You seem to confuse Socialism with Nationalism and Totalitarianism. There has never been a true socialist state, just the same as there has never been a true communist state. The USSR, Nazi Germany, German Democratic Republic, People’s Republic of China and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea were/are all practicing state controlled capitalism.

    “– Any policy that makes things hard for businesses is better for a Whites-only type of society

    The more regulations and the harder it is for companies to setup, the better it is for a Whites-only type of society. Most liberal states have extremely low non-white populations for this reason already.

    When companies setup they almost always bring in non-white employees and non-white customers, making a Whites-only type of society impossible.”

    That’s just not true. Thoughtful and meaningful regulation protects everyone, no matter what the colour of your skin is – black, white, red, yellow, blue, green, etc… And by thoughtful and meaningful regulation I mean fair and appropriate taxation, which provides free healthcare and welfare to the current workforce and free high quality education to the future workforce.

    Socialism is ultimately an intermediary step towards true communism, as per the writings of Karl Marx. In a true communist society everyone gets paid the same, whether you are a garbage collector, a politician, a brain surgeon, or, indeed an astronaut.

    I’d personally argue that a garbage collector is every bit as important as an investment banker – we need both for society to function. It’s an unfortunate nature of life that many people are not born witht he intelligence to become an investment banker, just as it is unfortunate that many people are born with a skin colour that puts them at a predisposition to others. If I work for 10 hours a day collecting garbage ( a very phisically demanding job) do I not deserve to have the same standard of living as a banker (a job which mostly involves sitting down all day)?

    Free market capitalism favours the fortunate at the expense of the unfortunate. I haven’t even touched on the disabled or the mentally handicapped yet but as people born healthy and intelligent it is our responsibility to fund those that are not as capable as ourselves. THis is the idea of true socialism – you work and you get paid fairly. Communism is one step further where you work and take take what you need to survive.

  2. Anonymous / Sep 30 2013 8:38 pm

    this guy makes a lot of sense…

  3. itsnobody / Sep 25 2013 9:42 pm

    In response to:
    “http://i.imgur.com/mpQA0.jpg

    Use your amazing skills and tell me why each headline on the link above is wrong.”

    Thanks for demonstrating the gullible nature of a fool (atheist), it’s just propaganda.

    Explaining why each headline is wrong would take a long time, so instead I’ll use my amazing skills to come up with the equivalent for atheists:
    – Estonia is the very very least religious and very very most atheistic country in the world according to multiple sources (2005 Eurobarometer poll, 2008 Gallup poll) and Estonia has 0 Nobel prizes, an average IQ of 97, and consistently the highest or one of the highest murder rates in Europe year after year
    – The 2nd largest US mass-killing came from an atheist, Jim Jones, who killed nearly 1,000 people
    – The historical consensus is that Stalin killed over 20 million Christians in the name of atheism, to promote ‘scientific atheism’, to force people to become atheists
    – Tom Metzger founder of the Neo-Nazi group White Aryan Resistance is an atheist
    – Larry Darby, former state director of the extremely popular atheist organization ‘American Atheists’ is a holocaust denier
    – SVP an overtly Nazi party gained power in 2010 in the most celebrated liberal atheist country Sweden, the first time any Nazi party has gained power since the old Nazi Germany days
    – The historical consensus is that Nazism is either unrelated to Christianity or opposed to Christianity
    – 100% of all modern day White atheist countries (Denmark, Sweden, New Zealand, Latvia, Estonia, Czech Republic, etc…) are extremely racist and nationalist beyond imagination according to the peer-reviewed studies done on racism there
    – According to celebrated liberal atheists James D. Watson and Richard Lynn, evolution and natural selection directly supports the belief that certain ethnic groups are genetically less intelligent
    – There’s absolutely no opposition towards racism in the atheist community like how atheists speak up when it comes to things like gay rights or abortion rights (they actually disagree so they speak up on things like that)
    – The historical consensus is that Christianity and religion was directly responsible for causing the scientific revolution and that there were no ‘Dark Ages’ as portrayed in the media
    – The #1 physicist (Newton), #1 mathematician (Euler), and #1 Experimentalist (Faraday) were all extremely religious Christians who were much more religious than all the other scientists that lived during their era, who arguably advanced science, mathematics, and technology the most in history
    – After atheists took over science in the late 1960s and early 1970s we immediately stopped finding cures, the life expectancy started growing slower, physics became stuck with empirically untestable hypotheses, technology started growing slower, and science is heading towards pseudoscience
    – Life expectancy graphs clearly show the very slowest growth right after atheists took over science in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the life expectancy was 70 in 1961 and only 78 in 2011, atheists can’t do anything
    – The very very most religious Christian countries like the US, UK, Switzerland, Austria, etc…in the year 1960 (when people were more religious than now) had the highest life expectancies (in the low 70s) and most advanced technology, China (an atheist country) had a life expectancy of only 43 in 1960, China in the year 1960 had been largely uninfluenced by Christianity and religion, throughout history China had a lower life expectancy than most other civilizations, even the Roman Empire and Indus Valley had higher life expectancies than China did, since religion was holding back society according to the fools (atheists) then why were the most religious Christian countries the most advanced with the highest life expectancies and the least religious and non-Christian countries less advanced? The Christianized Caribbean countries had higher life expectancies than both atheist and Muslim countries in the year 1960. The year 1960 is important because of a lot of the world had still been uninfluenced by Christian countries. So the historical evidence and historical consensus clearly falsifies the atheists’ lies about religion holding back science and medical advances, LOL

    The response from the atheist community when confronted with racism has been to just to agree with racism, throw racist comments at me, or do everything they can to make atheists look good and Theists look bad. Atheists can care less about racism, if they had actually disagreed with racism it would be extremely easy for them to come out to oppose racism, instead they express far more opposition towards me criticizing atheists for being racist than they do towards racism which tells us the type of people that they are.

    I hope I can encourage people to view atheists as fully subhuman being before it’s too late.

    Atheists should just stop doing science or attempting to do science (they’ve already damaged science and held back society enough already), just go home and stop now!

    Atheists just can’t compete with me, all they have are they mimicked and copied garbage lies and arguments, they can’t independently think or generate ideas.

    Haha, my amazing skills DESTROY atheists every time!

  4. Whos the atheist / Sep 5 2013 10:48 am

    Whats with all this fear about atheist.
    If you had faith in a just god then wouldn’t you think that none of these things would ever come to happen? Or do atheist have more power than god? Or more to the point what religion do you actually follow? because most religions believe that their god would never allow bad things happen to them or they would go to heaven and the evil atheists would go to hell Thereby making all this talk about White Nationalists, Socialist, racists, atheist pointless because god would not let it go unpunished in the end. Or am i wrong and the atheist are right that there is no god.

    • itsnobody / Sep 23 2013 2:18 am

      Ignoring the fact that your post is unrelated to this article:
      “Whats with all this fear about atheist. If you had faith in a just god then wouldn’t you think that none of these things would ever come to happen? Or do atheist have more power than god?”
      – No way, the God that I believe in is unchangeable, and therefore a non-doer, although it could be thought that God does all, being the truth itself.

      It gets complicated, but believing that God exists doesn’t contradict the idea that atheists/racists will take over soon.

      In my mind, when I looked into the future in the 2100s-2200s there weren’t any non-whites there, I don’t know what happened to the non-whites.

      But since I believe in multiple time-lines, I think it’s probably impossible to predict the exact future.

      The only thing that can prevent what’s going to probably happen is some type of divine intervention, probably from myself or others.

      “Or more to the point what religion do you actually follow? because most religions believe that their god would never allow bad things happen to them or they would go to heaven and the evil atheists would go to hell Thereby making all this talk about White Nationalists, Socialist, racists, atheist pointless because god would not let it go unpunished in the end.”
      – That’s not true, most religions believe that the Earth is an evil place full of suffering, and that heaven or heavenly worlds are good places.

      Since atheists believe that everyone’s feelings, thoughts, emotions, and memories are nothing more than meaningless electrochemical reactions and that in the future the Earth, stars, suns, moons, solar systems, and the universe will be destroyed what’s the point of your post?

      “Or am i wrong and the atheist are right that there is no god.”
      – No, I’m right and the atheists are wrong.

      There really is a God or Supreme Being, initially I thought I could probably scientifically prove that an afterlife and an impersonal type of God exists but not a personal God, but after doing experiments I figured out a way to hypothetically scientifically prove that the personal Supreme Being exists as well.

  5. Kai / Aug 27 2013 1:16 pm

    The headlines in that image are based on soundbite information and obvious propaganda; personally I’d rank it up there with 1950’s CIA disinformation. It’s like stating that all Europeans are evil and are the children of Satan, while posting thousands of images illustrating the many atrocities Europeans have initiated across the globe using religion, secular science, and politics.

    • itsnobody / Sep 23 2013 12:19 am

      You’re just using a false analogy.

      My arguments show how socialism directly supports a Whites-only type of society and is the best method for stopping and preventing immigration and non-whites.

      It’s nothing like pointing out select instances, the whole socialist form of government is perfect for a Whites-only type of society.

      If for instance a mall gets set up right next to your house this would most likely bring in non-white customers, non-white employees, and ruin things for a Whites-only type of society.

      Supporting socialism and preventing companies from just setting up shop would stop this!

      Support socialism, support a Whites-only type of society!

  6. Ado / Jul 27 2013 4:42 pm

    Typical Jew

  7. Atheist voice / Jun 14 2013 10:47 am

    Your bible doesn’t make sense.

    You are a fucking moron.

    Live a good life. This is it.

    • Nobama / Jul 5 2013 8:47 pm

      You’re going to hell, pathetic piece of human garbage

    • itsnobody / Sep 23 2013 12:11 am

      Pointing out what you believe about the Bible doesn’t refute anything in this article.

      Thanks for providing more evidence that atheists are subhuman in terms of intelligence!

      There really is an afterlife, the reason why it’s unproven is just because it lacks empirical testability.

      Since I’m planning not to reveal my physics model even if I successfully complete it, there’s no harm in explaining ways that I thought of to empirically test the existence of an afterlife:
      – Figure out a way to objectively detect the type of energy consciousness is composed of, objectively prove that this energy is what consciousness is composed of, then detect what happens to this energy at the moment of death and show that consciousness continues after death
      – Build a mind-transfer machine, transfer the minds of 2 individuals, then use brain fingerprinting or some objective measure to prove that their minds have been switched, proving that consciousness isn’t composed of electrochemical reactions that cease after death
      – Build a machine that lets you view the conscious experience of a person on a monitor or TV-like screen, objectively verify that the machine is accurate, then view what occurs after death

      The main problem with proving an afterlife is just empirical testability, but atheists can’t live in denial forever, eventually it WILL be proven.

      I could reveal more, but why?

      Atheists are always weak and afraid, that’s why they discourage experimentation, why? Because experimentation tells us what reality is like.

  8. Chris R / Jun 9 2013 11:29 pm

    The idiocy and projection continue. Nothing written so far would indicate that the scaredy cat author has even half a brain.

    • itsnobody / Sep 23 2013 12:10 am

      How boring, do you fools (atheists) have anything to say besides personal attacks and ad hominems?

      Everything I wrote in this article is true, socialism is the very best method to prevent and stop immigration and preserve a Whites-only type of society.

      Face reality.

  9. Matt / May 18 2013 5:23 pm

    Use your amazing skills and tell me why each headline on the link above is wrong.

    • Dannnaday Coats / May 21 2013 2:28 am

      Another atheist moron. I could fill rooms full of hard drives with images from Cambodia, Russia, and China alone, the crimes of atheists.

      No atheistic society has ever been a success. They’re even less successful than Islamic societies. This is forgetting to mention the massive amount of racism among atheists like you. A hatred of blacks based on your crackpot scientific theories of eugenics. ‘Makes me want to throw up.

      • TriCountySyndicate / Jun 5 2013 2:21 pm

        Well you didn’t tell him why the headlines are wrong so what you said was pointless.

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: