Why an appeal to authority is NEVER valid in science
Throughout history the main block to scientific progress has always been the atheist population.
Now that the fools (atheists) have taken over science, science is ALL about authority and incredulity. You let a bunch of subhuman atheist animals run loose and all they do is turn science into a laughable popularity contest.
Now it’s time for me to teach the fools (atheists) why an appeal to authority is always invalid in science.
In science, scientific evidence is equivalent to empirical observations and valid reasons to support an assertion, not an authority figure or authority figures saying something.
Since authority figures saying something isn’t equivalent to scientific evidence an appeal to authority would always be invalid in science, always.
Let’s look at this simple example:
“The reason that the Earth revolves around the Sun is because some scientists said so” – an appeal to authority, the fool’s (atheist’s) way
“The reason that the Earth revolves around the Sun is because the heliocentric model predicts the observed data most accurately” – an actual reason
We also know from history that basically every authority figure (Newton, Einstein, Maxwell, etc…) has been wrong about something, so authority alone is highly unreliable.
Science has to do with empirically testing hypotheses and using empirical observations and valid reasons to determine what’s true or false, not with what authority figures believe.
Atheists have set back science by valuing authority too highly, it’s like taking massive steps backwards into ancient pre-science times.
Hopefully I can get people to give up the way of the atheist and go back to giving empirical observations and valid reasons to support assertions rather than just pointing out what authority figures say or believe.
In modern times now that atheists have taken over science people simply talk about what scientists say or believe instead of what empirical observations and valid reasoning tells us.
When the fools (atheists) debate and discuss things in modern times they will usually talk about “what credentials does this person have?”, “what education does this person have?” and other things revolving around authority alone rather than discussing “what are empirical observations and valid reasons to support this assertion?”. In other words modern science is JUST about authority.
Just imagine how far science would be if authority had absolutely no value and instead empirical observations and valid reasoning were the only things that were valued highly.
Take for instance something like the String Theory. Atheists have concluded that the String Theory is science simply because “some scientists have said so” even though the String Theory matches the exact precise definition of pseudoscience, it is accepted as science because of nothing more than authority. In other words in modern times things are considered as science or pseudoscience by nothing more than purely scientific recognition or authority alone rather than because they match a certain criteria.
Atheists are truthfully the most disgusting people that exist, always out to threaten science and hold back human progress.
What a sad thing it is that now that atheists have taken over science, science is all about “determining what’s true or false by using authority”.
No greater threat has arisen to science than the rise in the atheist population.