Skip to content
December 27, 2011 / itsnobody

Why society should not accept atheists/racists as human beings

There is a natural tendency for society consider atheists/racists as human beings, but why should society consider them as human beings?

Just as how society does not accept terrorists, murderers, or rapists as human beings, why should society accept atheists/racists as human beings?

The only atheists I can consider as human beings are non-racists atheists (if there is a such thing). I’ve only met one non-racist atheist, who was a non-white female atheist. I guess only some non-white atheists are non-racists.

100% of atheist countries are extremely racist, there is not even one exception. No one can name even one atheist country that isn’t extraordinarily racist.

I’m just glad that I live in the US, which is one of the least racist countries in comparison to all others. As a non-white male living in the US I can honestly say that I haven’t experienced any public racism. In the US I’ve been allowed to enter every bar and club I’ve tried with no problems (even when I traveled to deep South).

The only racism I’ve experienced in the US has been from atheists/racists in private. I can only imagine how racist society would become if atheists took over a whole country. The more atheists you get to know the more you realize how racist they are.

Countries atheists take over like Canada, Australia, Netherlands, France, Russia, and others will immediately become racist and nationalistic nearly overnight specifically because of the atheist population. All the regions atheists take over in the US will also become racist like California, Illinois, New Jersey, and New England.

Initially I thought most of the racism in atheist countries had been caused by the Muslim population. However after closer inspection I found that atheist countries with extraordinarily low Muslim populations are also extremely racist and that the discrimination in atheist countries is not against Muslims only.

New Zealand, an atheist country, has an extremely low Muslim population so the atheists there instead discriminate against Asians.

“The survey, conducted annually by UMR Insight Ltd since 2000, showed that 77 per cent of New Zealanders consider that Asians are discriminated against more than any other group. This figure is up from 75 per cent in 2009 and 74 per cent in 2008” – http://www.hrc.co.nz/2011/asians-still-the-most-discriminated-against 

This survey most likely understates the discrimination in NZ. If we went by the actual percentage of male Asians living in NZ who have experienced racial discrimination the percentage would probably be higher (this survey is the percentage of New Zealanders who consider that Asians are discriminated against more than any other group).

“It is disturbing that most participants in the research had experienced some form of racism” – http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10345507

In New Zealand, throwing racial insults at a male Asian who is walking down the street alone is just a normal thing that atheist New Zealanders do.

If they see a male Asian alone some atheist New Zealanders might say something like “What’s up Kung Pao chicken? Why don’t you take your slant-eye back to Asia you stupid chink”. Or they might be more creative with their insults and first politely ask “Which direction to the airport?” then when the male Asian responds they’ll say something like “Well why don’t you take your family there and go back to Asia you stupid Asian”.

If they don’t throw racial insults at Asians they might instead throw trash or a half-eaten hamburger at Asians. Most Asians in New Zealand try to walk in groups to avoid the normal racial abuse in NZ. In New Zealand that type of racism isn’t out of the ordinary or strange, it’s just a normal, common, everyday thing.

Sweden another atheist country has a reasonably significant Muslim population (but still less than 5%), but white atheist Swedes do not only hate Muslims but also Jews. According to the Jews who fled Malmo most of the threats Jews faced came from left-wing white Swedes and a very small segment of Muslims.

“He describes for the newspaper how people call him “damn Jew” (‘jävla jude’) when he walks to synagogue and that his friends are frequently harassed and threatened.” – http://www.thelocal.se/24632/20100127/

Swedes don’t only hate Muslims, they also hate Jews and Africans. The racist gunman in Sweden tried to kill off a black man waiting at a bus stop, and also many others (http://www.theweek.co.uk/politics/10525/dark-skinned-swedes-live-fear-racist-gunman).

In April 2011, white Swedes held a slave auction at the most prestigious university in Sweden, Lund University.

“This racism is becoming all too common. Of course it is irritating. They (the nations) claim it was a joke but this is based on widespread attitudes that people from Africa or have dark skin are of lower value.” – http://www.thelocal.se/33290/20110419/

Remember, Sweden has a population of less than 9.5 million and is nearly 100,000 sq km larger than Germany (which has a population of over 80 million), so it should be extraordinarily unlikely that any racist events would happen in Sweden if the majority were not racist.

Latvia, another atheist country has an extremely low Muslim population (2000 or less Muslims, less than 0.1% of the population) yet Latvia is arguably even more racist than Sweden or Denmark. Latvia is already almost like a pure Nazi/Nationalist country. Racism in Latvia is a daily part of life according to case studies done (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/activities/14-Public_Presentation_Paris_2005/Presentation2005_Paris_proceedings_en.pdf).

Denmark, Czech Republic, and every other atheist country is also racist.

No one can name even one atheist country that isn’t extraordinarily racist.

People have to realize that an atheist world = a racist world.

Geographical distance doesn’t matter (New Zealand is geographically distant from Sweden), what matters is how high the atheist population is.

From these observations we can conclude that the racism in atheist countries has very little to do with Muslims. It’s just that in modern times Muslims are the easiest target so atheists only mention Muslims knowing that lots of different groups already hate Muslims. Mentioning Muslims only is a great strategy that atheists/nationalists can use to push atheist/nationalists laws. But even if atheist countries had a 0% Muslim population they would still find a group to hate like Jews or Asians or Africans.

In reality white atheists hate all non-whites, not just Muslims, they simply mention Muslims only knowing that lots of groups already hate Muslims.

The atheists in the US also have the same hatred as the atheists in other countries. Tom Metzger the founder of the Neo-Nazi group White Aryan Resistance is an atheist despite the fact that the atheist population in the US is low. There’s a dis-proportionally high amount of racist atheists in the US.

Since there are so many Nazi atheists I already know that lots of Nazis/atheists are rejoicing at the progress made in atheists/racist countries.

Other liberal atheists like Richard Dawkins, Richard Lynn, and James D. Watson have all voiced their support of scientific racism.

Such a disgusting low-life it is to be an atheist. No one really knows why atheists are such disgusting people, the lowest of the low. Instead of acknowledging that racist atheists even exist all atheists will do is change the subject to claiming that Theists are racists. The reason they do this is specifically because they agree with and support racism and don’t want anyone to criticize racist atheists or racism in general.

These people called “atheists” are truthfully the worse people you will ever find. Anyone who knows an atheist knows the type of people that they are.

When people strongly disagree with something they voice opposition. The main reason why atheists have remained silent in opposition to racism is specifically because they agree with and support racism.

Nationalists all know that religion is one of their greatest enemies (if not their very greatest enemy).

The next thing that atheists/racists will start saying is things like:
“Nationalism is not racism”
“What’s wrong with being a Nazi?”
“Racial discrimination is not racism”
“Believing that certain ethnic groups are genetically inferior or superior in terms of intelligence is not racism”

So what atheists are going to argue next is that nothing can be considered as racism.

People have to realize that this problem is directly caused by the atheist population. It’s not mere correlation, it’s causation. Once the atheist population goes up opposition towards racism fades dramatically. The less opposition there is towards racism (obviously) the easier it is for racists.

This problem is CAUSED by the atheist population.

No one really knows why atheists are such hateful, racist, evil people, the worst of all human beings. If atheists aren’t going to oppose racism, then it’s up to Theists to do it.

I dream of a world where there doesn’t even exist the smallest slightest amount of racism, but realistically as long as atheists exist that kind of society is quite impossible. By the year 2030 there should be lots of atheists/nationalists countries.

Is there a such thing as a white non-racist atheist? If there are then why don’t they ever speak out and voice any opposition to racism like how they voice opposition to Intelligent Design and many other things?

The simple fact is atheists speak out against lots of things, but racism is not one of them.

Knowing how racist atheists are I can only imagine what would happen if they took over a whole country. I’ve tried lots of things to get the racists/atheists I know in the US to stop being racist but nothing has worked so far. I know the type of people that atheists are.

Since I don’t want to live a Nazi/Nationalist/Atheist world I have to voice opposition.

I know there’s only a little bit of time left before atheists/racists try to take over the US as well and turn it into a Nazi/nationalist hell. It’s only up to Theists to voice any opposition to racism.

If anyone here reading this is an atheist, then I just want you to know that I truthfully don’t consider you or any of your other low-life racists atheists friends as human beings, but instead as subhuman beings.

In conclusion in order to reduce racism society shouldn’t accept atheists/racists as human beings unless they give up their racism.

“Where ever and whenever there is a predominance of atheism there is always racism, always” – itsnobody

[UPDATE 03.05.2012] This is boring and un-challenging, so here’s a summary of all the responses from low-life atheists/racists:
– Agree that they themselves and other atheists are racist
– Change the subject to claiming that Theists or some Theist country is racist (in order to prevent people from criticizing racists atheists)
– Not consider anything to be evidence that atheist countries are racist, but consider anything to be evidence that any religious country is racist
– Refuse to acknowledge that 100% of atheist countries are racist
– Refuse to acknowledge that any racist atheists exist
– Claim not to be racist, but give no reasoning as to how you can believe in evolution and that the physical brain is the mind and not be a racist
– Throw personal attacks and ad hominems (atheists really believe that this refutes an argument)
– Intentionally remain silent in opposition to racism

This entire time not one atheist has even acknowledged that racist atheists exist or that racist atheist countries exist, why is this? It’s because atheists all strongly agree with and support racism so they intentionally refuse to criticize other racist atheists.

They want the racism to continue on and on so they intentionally remain silent in opposition to racism and try to protect racist atheists from criticism.

They don’t consider anything to be evidence that atheist countries are racist specifically because they want the racism in those countries to continue on and on.

Advertisements

251 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Sayon of Liberty / Feb 2 2017 5:16 pm

    1. There are definitely racist atheists, as there are certainly racist theists and deists and racist salary men. The poor programming that results in a racist mentality is not exclusive to atheism, all humanity could fall victim to it. Though your conclusion that all atheists are racist as a result of their belief in the superiority of whites by way of evolutionary theory is a false premise. Evolutionary theory does not preach the superiority of “white” genes.

    While the compiler and editor of the content at the following link is most certainly bias, the information presented seems to be factual and from reliable sources.

    [ http://revcom.us/a/156/creationist_big_lie-en.html ]

    Your Argument would be correct but due to its premise being false the conclusion is invalidated.
    (based on confirmation of the validity of the information presented ofc)

    2) Sweden does actually suffer from racism (confirmed from several sources) however, it is not as widespread as you make it out to be and racism is reviled by both thiest and non thiests alike in Sweden. (Actively reviled, protests sometimes armed sometimes peaceful, political propaganda perpetuating the racial tension beyond its factual heights for the benefit of those discriminated against and likely also to serve its own political agenda((s)) ). I would say the country is split between extremists from both ends of the spectrum and the moderate populace all of which collectively feature near non-existent to major racism.) A culture of assimilation certainly seems to exist but not for the exclusion or preconceived detriment of any perceivable “races” or “racial traits”. The assimilation is only a matter of adopting the country’s culture not genetics. This culture also would not presume the inferiority of non white “races” or even recognize race in that sense at all ( If its culture is in fact dominated by Atheism and the evolutionary theorem ).

    3) Also just a side note and while this does not take away from your argument in anyway you are technically declaring yourself as a low life/sub human by declaring them subhumans. Racism aimed at “Racists/Atheists” is actually still Racism. Since there is no actual & factual separate human races (in the view of evolutionary theory at least) your categorical discrimination is in fact racist and so it subjects you to your own discriminatory labels.

    4) If you are trolling (which appears to be the most likely case given the structure and diction of your initial post and subsequent posts) you are Légendaire and I would be happy to swing a gift your way to celebrate your achievement in trolling.

    – S.o.L

  2. icedtoffeecoffee / Jan 28 2017 1:38 am

    Since when was NZ an atheist country? 50% Christian , and other religions make up the rest. 40% of people identify with no religion.

    I’m Jewish. I have plenty of atheist friends.
    There are some far right Jewish groups who are extremely racist towards Arabs. Anyone can be racist.

  3. Georgia Jones / Jun 9 2016 3:39 am

    This is ridiculous. Yes, some people are racist, but why are guy linking that with not believing in gods? You may as well be saying ‘vegans/ninjas’
    Growing up and living in New Zealand my self this article is particularly ridiculous

  4. Anonymous / Dec 24 2015 7:00 pm

    So atheists/racists are sub-human? Like a separate…caste? Class? Whats the word I’m looking for? Oh yes, race. Racists are members of an inferior race. Makes sense.

  5. Dave white / Oct 7 2015 6:24 pm

    Athiests are on most part humanist, your sources are cherry picked and inaccurate and or false.
    You could have spent the hour + you took to post this to help other people / live your life.
    The 5 min I spent reading this was educational to me allowing me to use my logic to add a little more comon sense to my daily life.

    If you tried to “convert an athiest” you failed. To any other on the fence religious person I think you just tipped them away.

  6. Anonymous / Oct 1 2015 6:23 pm

    Both articles of yours that I’ve read are heavy on cherry-picking and self-righteous moralizing. Self-righteousness itself stems from cherry picking.

  7. Daniel Bird / Sep 10 2015 6:52 pm

    You are just as bad as anyone else by stereotyping atheists I’m afraid ‘itsnoboby’.

    I’m a white atheist male living in the UK and I have white, black, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, America, European and South American friends from around the World.

    I’m an atheist because I don’t believe in god or religion. It has nothing to do with racism what-so-ever.

    To be completely frank…. I think that religious people are crazy believing that a god created this existence. What kind of god is he if he allows hunger, famine and disease to cause suffering to people around the world?

    Muslims… they’re crazy for believing in god….. (but don’t let me stop there otherwise I would be considered a racist) …..Christians, Buddhists, Jews and any other religion that I can possibly think of are equally as crazy.

    But…. I completely accept that anyone following any kind religion thinks that I am equally as crazy for not believing in a god and I don’t think anything less of them because of it.

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion – including me.

    You also mention that you have been able to enter every bar you’ve been into without any problems. How do you know that such problems exist in Canada, Australia, Netherlands, France and Russia? I’m well travelled and have been to all of these countries and have seen people of all races inside.

    Anyway…. go and score some pot and chill. That’s what you black people do isn’t it? (that was a joke by the way….. I love smoking pot… ….it’s helps me get in touch with my spiritual side).

  8. Codey / May 31 2015 6:09 pm

    And I don’t think we should consider religious class-ists to be human beings….

  9. I am not Charlie / Jan 13 2015 1:18 am


    Last week , France was stroke by terrorist attacks made by 3 homegrown Muslim fundamentalists.

    As a French Christian , I am devastated by the brutality of their murderers and mourns the death of the innocents : the 3 police officers and the 4 hostages who died in the Hyper Casher market.
    But the media did not notice that many French don’t support Charlie Hebdo because the paper spread atheism and the material was often racist.

    In France , Charlie Hebdo has a right to publish whatever it wants , and never hesitated to reinforce racial hierarchy and bully minorities whenever it can.
    The deceased journalists who put lipstick on sexism and racism are victims and martyrs ( of atheist mythology ) but not innocent.

    This is not a racial war : the Kouaci brothers shot a French Muslims cop named Ahmed Merabet in cold blood. The victim who has died in the street before a camera , and the murderers are both French Arabs.
    Their accomplice is a Black Muslim : Amédy Coulibaly killed a Black police officer from Western Indies.

    It is not even a religious war : many Jewish hostages were saved and supported by Muslim employees like Lassana Bathily , the Malian who hide 7 Jews before the police stormed the Hyper Casher market.

    It is an atheistic plan to provoke a civil war : the slaughter is the result of years of vile insinuations to incite the white French to bully minorities under the pretext of free speech.

    I support freedom of speech , not hate speeches.

    Je ne suis pas Charlie.

    Glad to see that abroad , some know what is really Charlie Hebdo :

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/page/ct-charlie-hebdo-free-speech-paris-racism-perspec-0111-jm-20150109-column.html

  10. itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:44 am

    After all this time 100% of the responses from the fools (atheists) are just what I predicted.

    100% of the responses from the fools (atheists) fit into these categories:
    – Agreeing with or supporting racism or nationalism
    – Trying to make atheists look good and/or Theists look bad and/or trying to stop me from criticizing atheists for being racist
    – Throwing personal attacks at me

    0% of the responses from the fools (atheists) actually oppose racism or racist atheists.

    Why can’t the fools (atheists) do anything differently from what I predicted, like actually opposing racist atheists and racism?

    If atheists are in opposition to racism then where are all the comments from the supposedly non-racist atheists opposing racism and other racist atheists?

    Like I said correlation isn’t causation, the atheist population directly causes White Nationalism to thrive because it directly causes opposition towards White Nationalism to disappear…the main reason is because there aren’t any mainstream Christian denominations that accept White Nationalism or Nazism.

    What would happen in a near 100% atheist population is that there would be absolutely no opposition towards White Nationalism or Nazism. The supposedly non-racist atheists would NEVER EVER oppose racism or White Nationalism, instead they would focus their energy on making atheists look good by claiming to be non-racist. This means racist atheists and White Nationalist atheists would be free to be as racist or nationalist as they want with ZERO opposition from anyone.

    It’s already happened in 100% of all modern day atheist countries like Sweden, Denmark, New Zealand, etc…there’s absolutely ZERO opposition towards racism and nationalism in those countries and if you attempt to oppose racist atheists there the supposedly non-racist atheists will try to stop you.

    Just imagine how great it must feel to be BOTH a racist and an atheist…the ENTIRE atheist community is on your side ensuring that you can be as racist as you want.

    I just hope I can get society to view atheists as subhuman beings before it’s too late.

  11. Rafael Ramirez / Aug 30 2014 3:26 pm

    I read the first few sentences and decided this is the stupidest shit ive read all day.

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:34 am

      Like I said throwing personal attacks at me refutes nothing that I said.

      Weak, useless, subhuman beings.

  12. Alex Mann / Mar 16 2014 11:25 am

    Sick and retarded theist here. Typical. Consider anyone not of your creed sub-human. News flash too: Theists are more likely to be racist than atheists. Stupid fuck. You know if there is a god they guy telling people to consider me sub-human will be the one in hell

    • Alex Mann / Mar 16 2014 11:27 am

      Not to mention your claims are from biased opinionated sources. I understand though, it is because your religion is about to die and you’ll be left in the minority getting called sub-human for your faith. I will love that day 🙂

      • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:34 am

        Like I said throwing personal attacks at me refutes nothing that I said.

        Weak, useless, subhuman beings.

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:33 am

      But how?

      Oh wait you didn’t explain anything lol…

      There hasn’t been any peer-reviewed study on the “Religious views of those who identify themselves as White Nationalists” in the US…and there aren’t any mainstream Christian denominations that accept White Nationalism or Nazism.

      Alex Linder owner and operator of the popular White Nationalist forum VNN in the US is an atheist, and the US has only a 0.7% atheist population according to the 2008 ARIS report.

      We know that 100% of all modern day atheist countries like Sweden, Denmark, New Zealand, etc…are extremely racist/nationalist.

      Just imagine what’s going to happen in the US once the atheist population goes up.

  13. GOEBBELS SOCIETY part 2 / Feb 28 2014 11:52 am

    Hi there to all, because I am really eager of reading this blog’s post to be
    updated on a regular basis. It carries pleasant data.

  14. Anon / Aug 13 2013 12:03 am

    It’s people like you that make me happy to be an atheist. The absolute blind faith you have, and lack of common sense leads you to these horrendous and idiotic assumptions. I am white and my wife is black. We adopted a little girl last year and she’s from Vietnam. Where do you come off assuming we atheists are racist?

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:29 am

      Throwing personal attacks at me doesn’t refute any statement that I made.

      You responded exactly how I predicted, by trying to make atheists look good rather than by opposing racism or racist atheists.

      So why can’t you supposedly non-racist fools (atheists) ever actually oppose racism or racist atheists instead of opposing me for criticizing atheists for being racist or focusing your energy on making atheists look good?.

      The supposedly non-racist atheists like yourself aren’t opposing any of the racist atheists who posted racist comments here are they? Instead they’re focusing on making atheists look good by claiming to be non-racist and stopping me from criticizing racist atheists, thereby ensuring that racist atheists are free to be as racist as they want.

      Foolish (atheistic).

  15. Hipster Racist / Jul 27 2013 4:03 pm

    Why should society accept anti-racists as human beings?

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:23 am

      Well that’s a good question, why don’t you post a blog article about it and have commenting free and open like I do?

  16. oogenhand / Jul 27 2013 12:08 pm

    Reblogged this on oogenhand and commented:
    Atheists have less desire to convert than Theists, so it is not surprising that they are more open to seeing many human beings as unworthy of conversion.

  17. Tremley (@tremley) / Jul 25 2013 6:41 am

    Do we hear governments, the mass media, and academia calling for Japan to bring in millions of non-Japanese people and assimilate with them because they’re “not diverse enough”?

    Exactly — we ONLY hear this about White countries. You anti-Whites are calling for the genocide of White people.

    Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:17 am

      Yeah well at least you can admit that you’re a racist/nationalist atheist.

      You know that the other supposedly non-racist atheists would NEVER EVER oppose you EVER.

      Just read the comments here from the fools (atheists).

  18. Leon K (@LeonKr4) / Jul 24 2013 11:05 am

    I’m going to guess if Swedes dislike non-whites it has something to do with the huge rape rate in Sweden. it isn’t called the rape capitol of Europe for nothing. You think that might have something to do with it, itsnobody? No of course not. They woke up one morning and decided to be racist because they are jerks.

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:15 am

      LOL…you can’t be this foolish (atheistic).

      Sweden’s murder rate in 2012 is 0.7 per 100,000, the lowest in ALL of Sweden history since the 1960s/1970s, which is a murder rate lower than all 50 US states and almost every country’s murder rate in the entire world.

      Falsely reporting a rape sure is extremely easy, but falsely reporting a homicide sure is extremely difficult…

      The reason why the “reported” rape rate in Sweden went up is because the Nazis in Sweden changed the rape counting laws so that 1 report could count as 1000 rapes or 100 rapes and also because falsely reporting a rape is really easy.

      You can’t easily falsely report a homicide like a rape can you?

      I also noticed that car thefts in Sweden decreased as well…falsely reporting a car theft sure is difficult since you can’t just call the cops and make up a license plate number right?

      Anyone can just make up a rape story right now and falsely report a rape.

      If Sweden had normal rape counting laws the reported rape rate their would only be 2.0-4.0 per 100,000 LOL.

      The reported number of homicides in Sweden in 2009 was 232 but the actual was 92 (over 100 were false reports), so what do you think the actual rape rate is?

      Posts like these just show how uneducated and gullible the fools (atheists) are.

      Foolish (atheistic).

      Thanks for showing the disgusting low-acting racist nature of the fools (atheists).

  19. dj / Jun 7 2013 5:19 pm

    srsly, I have encountered this unsupported, absolutely uninformed opinion before. WHERE in the world do you make the connection that atheists are racist? I suggest you come out from under your rock and try life in the real world. Try a highly populated city for instance, a heterogeneous part of civilization, where you will no doubt LEARN that most atheists are in FACT, the most tolerant non-racist, group of people you will ever meet, On the flip side of the same coin, religious people are THE most bigoted racists on the planet. Secretly, quietly, cowardly, yes, but racist, indeed. Hateful, racist cowards who hide behind their cloak of self proclaimed piety. All laughable, all the same…you are a moron. an idiot. You are a hateful bigoted incompetent. Visit universities, check out departments of law and the sciences, archeology, history, biology, and find for yourself in the company of the most highly educated who are also NON theist. Why is that? The more you know, the more you know how ignorant it is to support such fantasies when we have real world problems to solve, all being held back by ignorant bigoted human beings we work daily to keep alive, like yourself. its tiring…

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:57 am

      Why the fuck do the fools (atheists) keep asking the same fuckin questions I already answered?

      Here’s an answer to your foolish (atheistic) question that I already answered –

      WHERE in the world do you make the connection that atheists are racist?

      Because:
      – 100% of all modern day atheist countries are racist/nationalist
      – The atheist community refuses to oppose racism and nationalism
      – In the US Tom Metzger founder of the Neo-Nazi group “White Aryan Resistance” is an atheist
      – In the US Alex Linder, owner and operator of the White Nationalist forum VNN is an atheist
      – In the US, Larry Darby former state director of the popular atheist group “American Atheists” is a holocaust denier
      – The US has only a 0.7% atheist population (according to the 2008 ARIS report)
      – There aren’t any mainstream Christian denominations that accept White Nationalism or Nazism
      – The supposedly non-racist atheists are nowhere to be found actually opposing racism or racist atheists
      – Lots of comments here on this blog site are from racist atheists

      So from all the evidence we can clearly see that the atheist population directly causes White Nationalism to thrive because the atheist population directly causes opposition towards White Nationalism/Nazism to disappear.

      In other words, if there was a country with a 100% atheist population there would be almost no opposition towards White Nationalism and Nazism. The supposedly non-racist atheists would NEVER EVER oppose racism they would instead try to make atheists look good by claiming to be non-racist.

      On the other hand since there aren’t any mainstream Christian denominations that accept White Nationalism or Nazism if there was a high religious Christian population there would be lots of opposition towards White Nationalism and Nazism.

      I hope you understand.

      Foolish (atheistic)

  20. dj / Jun 7 2013 5:10 pm

    WHERE do you live? You are completely deluded about atheists.

  21. Kodi / May 21 2013 9:49 am

    Atheism= everything is permissible.

    No limits to immoral behavior since no (fundamental and dogmatic) deterrent.

    Just take one look at what the commies and Nazis did.

    • Anonymous / Jun 29 2013 11:21 pm

      If you need a God to know that you shouldn’t kill, something is wrong.

    • Anonymous / Aug 1 2013 10:12 pm

      Funny because Nazi’s were Catholic/Christians and Communists usually followed a religion worshipping their country leader so they were not Atheists.

      • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 3:27 am

        No fool (atheist).

        The historical consensus on Nazism and religion is that Nazism is either unrelated to or opposed to Christianity.

        The junk on atheist blog sites has been thoroughly debunked by historians.

        Read more here – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany

        Modern day Nazis as well Nazis of the past confirm the historical consensus…how can the fools (atheists) deny the historical evidence and consensus?

        Also saying Communists weren’t atheists is just a no true Scotsman fallacy.

        Foolish (atheistic)

    • Manya Sharma / Mar 20 2016 4:14 pm

      Hitler was a baptized christian

  22. Dannaday Coats / Apr 29 2013 6:09 am

    Atheists lose every argument they get into. Way to humiliate ’em, itsnobody! Their racism doesn’t stand up to the spotlight of truth!

  23. Anonymous / Apr 12 2013 11:02 am

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism

    First of all, take a look at the percentage of atheists in these countries you so commonly call as having a majority of atheists, when none have a percentage of over 30%, far from majority.
    Then for your questions:

    – If you’re not a racist then instead of simply claiming not to be racist why don’t you open up your low-life atheist mouth and voice opposition towards racism and criticize racist atheists?
    I am an atheist. Now, in the modern world, not everyone is going to voice opposition against absolutely every topic they disagree with. I detest genocide, the Nazi party, and Eugenics, and I believe most people would agree with these hatreds along side me, but you never see active movements against these things, or at least in bulk. There are so many controversial topics to take a side on that it is impossible to become an activist in all of them. Racism is not an issue where I live , and thus I don’t focus on it in my everyday life, however I do focus on people forming radical opinions that are not based on fact at all.

    – Why do you want people to not to criticize atheists for being racist?
    Once again, you have very little factual evidence to show that atheists are actually racist. However, if I came out and criticized every single thing that any person said that I disagreed with, I would have no friends, and most likely, no social life. Also, assuming America is not a racist as a whole is most definitely not true. In the world of high school and joking amongst friends, races are often targeted and made fun of, even if it is as a joke. I can not openly speak about countries I don’t live in, bus as an American citizen, and having been one for my entire life, I can say that I have experienced quite a few racist jokes, activities, and people both from those that are religious and otherwise. These are not malicious in the least, as some have even been from people of different ethnicities regarding their own race, poking fun at stereotypes.

    – What can be considered as evidence that atheist countries are racist (since peer-reviewed studies, objective racist events, an racist parties gaining power don’t constitute as evidence)?
    First of all, it depends on your definition of racist, and a so called “atheist country”, even though no major European country you mention has over a 30% atheist population as of 2012. As evidence, I would like to see a country with a majority of atheist population first, and then I would like to see that country perform the acts you list as evidence for countries that are most definitely not controlled by an atheist population, such as Sweden, Norway, and New Zealand. Show me these things before you attack atheists as a whole using evidence that you have received from personal experiences with a few so called “racist atheists” and atheists that appear on television. People like Richard Dawkins, who you attack profusely, state explicitly to be not racist both in their books and in person. What you describe as racism is merely genetic differentiation between races. As humans evolved in different regions of the world, they develop different traits which may make them better in some ways than other regions, but also worse in others. These different races are just that, different, not superior or inferior to others.

    • poeslaw / Jun 25 2013 8:08 pm

      Oh my gosh! This is amazing work. Have you tried to get published? This information really needs to get out to the scientific community.

  24. itsnobody / Mar 23 2013 1:47 pm

    I’m waiting for atheists to answer three simple questions:
    – If you’re not a racist then instead of simply claiming not to be racist why don’t you open up your low-life atheist mouth and voice opposition towards racism and criticize racist atheists?
    – Why do you want people to not to criticize atheists for being racist?
    – What can be considered as evidence that atheist countries are racist (since peer-reviewed studies, objective racist events, an racist parties gaining power don’t constitute as evidence)?

    My guess is White atheists will never answer the questions.

    The responses from atheists tell us what they care about:
    – They care about making atheists appear as “good non-racist” people
    – They care about ensuring that no one is allowed to criticize atheists for being racist
    – They care about getting people to stop criticizing atheists for being racist

    That’s it.

    Since they prevent people from criticizing racist atheists we absolutely know they must either agree with and support racism or not disagree strongly enough to say anything.

    Let’s look at atheists’ reactions:
    – If they see a White racist atheist or evidence that an atheist country is racist: “Who cares? It’s no big deal I’m not going to voice any opposition”

    – If they see a someone criticizing atheist countries for being racist “Oh man I have to respond and ensure that no one is allowed to criticize atheists for being racist, that’s trolling and distasteful, nothing can ever be considered as evidence that any atheist country is racist. The reason why the US is racist is because anything can be considered as evidence that they are racist, it makes lots of sense to me”

    They want the racism to continue on and on.

  25. ethan roberts / Mar 21 2013 8:50 pm

    wait wait wait so were the one throwing personal attacks even though you posted an article that is in its self a personal attack on me and every on who is an atheist.

    • itsnobody / Mar 21 2013 9:06 pm

      What are you talking about shithead are you this dumb?

      There’s a big difference between throwing personal attacks and refuting an argument versus simply throwing personal attacks in substitution for refuting an argument.

      The article in itself isn’t a personal attack shithead I provided all types of studies and evidence indicating that the atheist countries are racist and all types of reasons but the response from the atheist crowd is just “nothing can ever be considered as evidence that any atheist country is racist”.

      Atheists will do anything they can to protect other racist atheists, they’re all in it together.

      Why can’t your low-life atheist kind ever open up your low-life mouth and provide reasons to support your low-life assertions?

      Can you give a fuckin reason for once in that low-life racist atheist life of yours?

      There’s not even one fuckin atheist in the whole fuckin world willing to even acknowledge that racist atheist countries exist, they can’t even do that, they’re that disgusting.

      It’s the same fuckin response from your low-life atheist kind.

      If someone were to accuse Christians of being racist or whatever there’s no way atheists would subjectively interpret it as “trolling” or “personal attacks” or whatever type of nonsense shit they’re saying.

      How is it a personal attack to provide studies indicating that atheist countries are racist?

      Give a fuckin reason for once in that low-life atheist life or yours, I know that since you’re an atheist you’re disgusted with providing reasons and just want racist atheists to be protected from criticism at all cost.

  26. Eff That / Feb 27 2013 5:56 pm

    Nice troll! Either that or you’re retarded.

    • itsnobody / Mar 21 2013 6:54 pm

      Throwing personal attacks doesn’t refute anything I’ve said, why the fuck can’t you people called atheists provide reasons to support your low-life assertions for?

      Well I guess I can’t really expect anything more from subhuman beings.

      They accuse anyone who criticizes atheists as “trolling” because they want racist atheists to not be criticized for being racist because they want the racism to continue on and on.

      You have to realize that all White atheists are in on this together, they all dream of a world where no one is allowed to criticize racist atheists specifically because they strongly agree with and support racism.

      White atheists will do everything they can to ensure that no one is allowed to criticize atheists for being racist thereby allowing White atheists to freely be as racist as they want.

      The rise in the White atheist population is like a dream come true for White Nationalists/racists!

      Truthfully atheists are the worst of all subhuman beings.

      Have fun living as a low-life!

  27. BlackAtheist / Jan 18 2013 9:44 am

    Thanks to the author of this article for a piece of brilliant comedy 😀

    • itsnobody / Mar 21 2013 6:57 pm

      The comedy is watching non-white atheists defend and protect racist atheists from criticism and scrutiny, lol they’re just like the new slaves for White atheists.

      They only have a problem with people who criticize atheists for being racist like me and a problem with non-atheist racists.

      For White racist atheists they have no problem with them being racist and just defend and protect them, lol.

      So they are part of the problem as well.

      Have fun living as a slave to White racist atheists, you low-life

      • PTBW Forever / May 13 2013 10:01 pm

        So basically your dumb ass thinks only white people can be racist…

        Most of the racism in Europe is AGAINST whites(natives). There aren’t any no-go areas for non whites in Europe retard.

      • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 4:01 am

        LOL how foolish (atheistic).

        I think non-whites can be racist, like the atheists in South Korea and North Korea (atheist countries).

        Also you’re wrong about Europe…Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia (the Northern European countries with the highest murder rates) have near 0% non-white and Muslim populations and the purest European stock.

        The European countries with the most multiculturalism and non-whites have the lowest murder rates, LOL.

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 4:02 am

      It’s always a great laugh to see delusional non-white atheists defend and protect racist White atheists…LOL

      They would only criticize a racist if they were Christian, once again re-confirming what I said about the atheist population directly causing no opposition towards White Nationalism and racism.

      Once they find out the media stereotype of most White Nationalists being Christian is wrong they all of a sudden stop opposing them, LOL.

  28. GnomeGrown / Jan 17 2013 11:53 pm

    Curious to know how I would be considered racist. I’m a white male atheist with black cousins, dating a mexican, and much of my outlook on life comes from the Dhali Lama. Further more, do to recent studies, everyone in the world is with in 50 cousins of eachother. So in other words, I look at everyone as family. I fail to see how your article holds any weight to it at all.

    • itsnobody / Mar 21 2013 7:03 pm

      Curious to know how having black cousins and dating a Mexican indicates that evolution and natural selection tells us that different ethnic groups geographically separated evolved to have identical intelligence.

      As usual your atheist kind never explains anything, they just make statements and throw personal attacks, it’s so boring.

      Go ahead and explain for once, why can’t atheists give reasons to support their assertions for? Are they this stupid and dumb?

      My article holds weight because it’s all backed up by solid evidence.

    • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 4:22 am

      I already explained fool (atheist).

      The supposedly non-racist atheists like yourself never oppose racism or other racist atheists, that’s how they directly cause White Nationalism and Nazism to thrive, by not opposing.

      Instead what the supposedly non-racist atheists like yourself do is focus their energy on making atheists look good by claiming to be non-racist and/or stopping people from criticizing racist atheists.

      The supposedly non-racist atheists like yourself don’t actually oppose racist atheists or racism.

      So why don’t they?

      In other words, you’re ensuring that racist atheists can be as racist as they want.

  29. itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 2:06 am

    Well the case is closed.

    We can see from the responses where atheists stand. There is no comment from any atheist that acknowledges that racist atheists and racist atheist countries even exist (obviously trapped in denial), and criticizes other atheists for being racist.

    So this clearly indicates that all atheists are in on this together and do not strongly oppose racism, if they had actually strongly opposed racism they would voice opposition towards racism and criticize other racist atheists instead of just claiming to be non-racist or throwing personal attacks at me.

    So we can conclude with 100% certainty that none of the atheists who commented strongly oppose racism.

    CASE CLOSED.

    I have to prepare for what’s going to happen to the US once the atheist population rises…

    • Dustin Braden / Jan 14 2013 2:17 pm

      If I refute your arguments, that means I am trapped in denial of the truth? I ask any rational person to read the comment I am replying to.

      • itsnobody / Jan 14 2013 7:25 pm

        Except that I already destroyed all of your arguments and already embarrassed you.

        You never refuted even one statement that I made.

        Also asking any supposed rational person to read the comment or whatever is just an appeal to authority and possibly an argumentum ad populum.

        It was a nice try though.

        You also never acknowledged that racist atheists existed and criticized them, but instead claimed that atheists have no reason to be racist and that it doesn’t matter if 100% of atheist countries are racist.

        So you’re basically saying that you don’t really care that 100% of atheist countries are racist or if atheists are racist, which means that I’m right since you refuse to oppose racism and criticize other racist atheists.

        So far there hasn’t been any atheist who commented here that has acknowledged that racist atheists exist and criticized them, instead they just attempt to make atheists look like good non-racist people and prevent people from criticizing racist atheists JUST as you have.

        Isn’t it true that preventing people from criticizing other racist atheists simply allows the racism to continue on and on?

        So I’m right, and all of my statements remain unrefuted.

        I win every time, it was nice try though.

      • Dustin Braden / Jan 15 2013 2:03 pm

        I am an atheist, and not a racist. Your argument is dead right there. You point out a few hate-crimes in majority-atheist countries and then assume that all atheists are racist. I can point out hate-crimes in theist countries, therefore all theists are racist. There is less hate-crime in atheist countries than majority-theist countries. This s not a strawman, I am turning the argument directly around.

      • itsnobody / Jan 16 2013 5:17 am

        Thanks for demonstrating how atheists are obviously less intelligent.

        You’ve claimed to not be a racist, so go ahead and explain how evolution tells us that different ethnic groups evolved to have identical intelligence.

        I didn’t argue that “atheists countries are racist therefore all atheists are racist” so you’re just using a straw man argument (you can look up what that means). Instead I argued that atheists should not be considered as human beings because 100% of all atheist countries are racist and explained how the atheist population directly causes racism to rise (opposition towards racism fades, scientific racism), and mostly because your atheist kind REFUSES to criticize other racist atheists, you intentionally REFUSE to.

        The atheist population DIRECTLY causes racism because opposition towards racism ceases once the atheist population goes up. Why doesn’t your atheist kind ever open up your low-life atheist mouth and criticize other racist atheists? They only criticize people for criticizing racists atheists. So this means that atheists care a lot about getting people like me to stop criticizing racists atheists, but they don’t care at all about getting racist atheists to stop being racist.

        We’re talking about 100% of all atheist countries that exist that are racist. Christian racists or whatever get criticized by everyone (especially other Christians). Racial discrimination in Sweden and New Zealand occurs on a daily basis and is not recorded as a “hate crime”. So in reality obviously atheists countries have more racism and racial discrimination, I don’t know if it’s going to be labeled as “hate crime”.

        The US is definitely one of the very least racist countries, I’ve repeatedly asked you and other atheists why you consider Sweden and New Zealand not be racist countries, but you still haven’t answered. By not considering anything to be evidence that atheist countries are racist you’re just protecting racists there, thereby allowing the racism to continue on and on.

        What laughable reasoning from the fools.

        It is a straw man because you’re setting up a misrepresentation of the argument, why you don’t read the entire article that I wrote instead of being the low-life racist atheist that you are.

        Since you obviously don’t understand my argument, I’ll just summarize it here (as to Why society shouldn’t consider atheists as human beings):
        – 100% of atheist countries are extremely racist
        – The rise in the atheist population causes opposition towards racism to cease
        – Atheists intentionally refuse to criticize racist atheists or even acknowledge that racist atheists or racist atheist countries exist

        So it would just be better for society if people viewed atheists/racists as subhuman beings rather than as human beings to end the racism.

        All that the supposedly “non-racist” atheists have been doing is claiming not to be racist and protecting other racist atheists and racist atheist countries from criticism. You just have to realize that all White atheists are in on this that’s why the atheist community has remained silent in opposition towards racism and has refused to acknowledge that racist atheists exist and criticize them.

        What an atheist world stands for is a racist society. This is shown by 100% of modern atheist countries.

        I know it’s true that once the atheist population goes up in the US things will become more racist than ever specifically because the atheist population ensures that opposition towards racism ceases.

        So I just have to warn people about what’s going to happen and also prepare for what’s going to happen.

  30. Black Atheist Greydon Square / Jan 11 2013 1:44 am

    Lol I’ve been reading a load of the comments this dudes posted in response to people. Even though he is very over-the-top in the field of douchebagery, his trolling is epic. This shits funny as hell lolololololololol

    • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 12:31 am

      Throwing personal attacks at me refutes no statement that I made, that’s why I call it argument ad hominems.

      Have fun living in your delusional world “no it can’t be, it just can’t be, he’s just wrong and he’s just trolling, and I don’t have to refute any statement he made”

  31. Black Atheist Greydon Square / Jan 11 2013 1:12 am

    People people, don’t get worked up. The guy who wrote this article is clearly trolling. He’s just saying obscene things to piss you all off. Just look at his name “itsnobody” obviously a troll name. No one in the real world can actually be as dumb as him, if he actually is this dumb and believes the stuff he’s saying then jesus fucking cock sucking christ he’s too far gone to ever listen to rationality. But he’s just trolling. He’s clearly gone to a lot of effort to type all this out, perhaps he really does hate atheists, and is trying to satisfy that hatred by pretending that atheists are racist. Hell, hardly any atheists are racist, everyone knows racism is a right wing trait. He’s just trolling you guys, don’t get mad. He’s a faker!

    • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 12:29 am

      How boring, you’re just using argument ad hominems.

      It’s always a great laugh to see delusional non-white atheists come in to protect other White atheists, they’re just like the new slaves for White atheists. “Christian” racists or whatever have to fight-off Churches and all mainstream Christian denominations, be criticized by non-white Christians, and everyone in general.

      When non-white atheists see White racist atheists they instead just protect white racists atheists from criticism, just like a stupid slave.

      Have fun being a new slave for racists White atheists!

      Face reality: 100% of ALL White atheist countries are extremely racist

      • Manya Sharma / Mar 20 2016 4:20 pm

        I am a non-white atheist. Arguments in this article have no back ups in any kind of statistics & studies. Cherry picking a few incidents cannot be generalized on the entire atheist population. Just like we don’t blame Nazism & female genital mutilation on entire Christian population (since Hitler was a catholic). Remember the Crusades? The Colonization of third world countries & forced conversion & slavery? All were done in the name of religion, not atheism. The article is prejudiced and hate hatchet job on atheists from start to finish. Do more research & present government backed up statistics then I may take your next article on atheists seriously.

    • Kay / Jul 16 2013 4:17 pm

      “Racism is a right wing trait”. I take offense at that. Racism is prevalent EVERYWHERE, not just America. There and liberal racists and conservative racists. You’re being a hypocrite by judging half of the country as being racists purely because of their political ideology. I’m a conservative Libertarian, technically “right wing” and I am not racist. You should judge people as individuals and not buy into stereotypes. Opinions like yours fuel racial divides and keep both political parties from ever finding peace and common ground. You might want to think about how YOU’RE being prejudiced too.

  32. Anonymous / Dec 10 2012 7:44 am

    What drug are you on , original poster? Are are you just plain ignorant and brainwashed…

    • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 12:37 am

      Which part is ignorant, can you all try to provide reasons or explanations to go with your statements?

      Oh wait I forgot atheists are allergic to giving reasons and are naturally anti-science fans.

  33. Anonymous / Oct 24 2012 12:32 pm

    The author of this piece of shit is: bigoted, an asshole, and the like. This person seriously knows nothing about us atheists. After all, what evidence is there to support that atheists should be considered anything less than human? In fact, we atheists are more “natural” if I may say so myself, since nothing else in nature seems to worship a deity.

    • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 12:42 am

      I don’t consider racists to be human beings, and since 100% of White atheists are racists I don’t consider them to be human beings.

      I’ve already provided lots of evidence that 100% of White atheist countries are racist, and the US will definitely become more racist once the atheist population grows.

      People have to realize that ALL White atheists are in on this, their silence in opposition towards racism and their attempts to prevent people from criticizing racists atheists clearly tells us where they stand.

      • Manya Sharma / Mar 20 2016 4:23 pm

        Please back up a study or government statistic to prove your statement of “100 of white atheist are racists” If you cannot present evidence for that argument, then you are lying obviously.

    • Kay / Jul 16 2013 4:22 pm

      Nothing else in nature cooks their food either. Nothing else in nature creates art or complex ideologies. Nothing else in nature has a sense of morality. Spirituality is a VERY human trait. It is VERY natural. It’s also natural for humans to go against the grain, thus atheism. There is nothing wrong with being spiritual and there’s nothing wrong with not being spiritual. Why does everything always have to be a contest? Humans have been spiritual since their beginnings. Why must atheists constantly condescend spiritual people for their beliefs? I’m not religious, but I am very spiritual and I couldn’t care less if you are or are not. Live and let live. Your beliefs are no more “right” or “correct” or “natural” than mine.

      • An Agnostic / Nov 26 2013 1:53 pm

        Kay:
        -Actually morality does exist elsewhere in nature, there are examples in the animal kingdom that are analogous to what we call morality. It also exists in the absence of religious belief.
        -You may be technically right wing but may not be depending on which definition of “right wing” you wish to invoke. The common element in most peoples’ definition is that the right wing attempts to control people and is not above using force to it. If one were to want their followers to dominate a group of people they first step is to suggest that they are less than human or inferior, hence racism is typically a right wing trait.
        -Atheists make it a contest because organised religion made it a contest first. Right wing elements seized control of large groups of people through religion then proceeded to have them do immoral things in the name of their deity for the real purpose of expansion of their power base. The atheists that speak out against religion, not all do, are responding in part to the hypocrisy demonstrated by many organised religions throughout history. They are also railing against the oppression and indoctrination that occurs when organised religion gets into bed with or completely dominates a government. As a child I had to say “the lords prayer” in public school, a very mild example of how organised religions attempt to brainwash children. A lot of atheists couldn’t actually care less what you believe in, just don’t ram your beliefs down their throats. To be clear Kay, I am not saying that you specifically are doing this but by siding in any way with someone like itsnobody you may be aligning yourself on one side of yet another religious war.

        WRT to itsnobody, I agree with Greydon. While it is sad that in this day and age one can expect this kind of hate mongering, it is unlikely that anyone is this ignorant. It could even be that itsnobody is really an atheist who is trying to make religious fanatics look bad 😉

      • itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 4:50 am

        Another fool who has an issue with me opposing and criticizing racist atheists, who merely comes out to make atheists look good.

        Why don’t the supposedly non-racist atheists EVER OPPOSE racism and White Nationalism for?

        How foolish it is to call someone hate-mongering for criticizing racist atheists but not call racist atheists and atheist White Nationalist hate-mongering.

        In other words, you’re ensuring that racist atheists are free to be as racist as they want since you’re stopping all criticism of racist atheists.

        Foolish (atheistic).

  34. Peter A. / Oct 20 2012 1:43 am

    ‘I’m just glad that I live in the US, which is one of the least racist countries in comparison to all others.’ – Ever hear of the Ku Klux Klan? Are you nuts?
    One other thing; Islam is a religious ideology, not a ‘race’. Are you really that daft?

    • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 12:57 am

      lol thanks for your demonstrating your subhuman level of intelligence

      The US has a population greater than 310 million, and the KKK is composed of 3,000 to 5,000 members, and that’s what you consider to be evidence that the US is racist in modern times?

      New Zealand has a population < 4.5 million
      Sweden has a population < 9.5 million

      It wouldn't matter how many studies or racist events I point out indicating that Sweden and New Zealand are extremely racist, atheists still claim that nothing can be considered as evidence that they are racist countries

      So tell me with that low-life atheist mouth, what is the reason that you consider the US to be racist, but not Sweden or New Zealand?

  35. Anonymous / Sep 22 2012 10:41 pm

    wtf are you a retard i am an atheist and i am one of the least racist people i know! im really angry now so excuse me for a second: COCK SHIT BUTT ASSHOLE FUCK YOURSELF GO DIE IN A HOLE YOU BITCHIN PATHETIC EXCUSE FOR A MOTHERFUCKING SHIT WHO DESERVES TO BE SHAT OUT OF SHIT THAT HAS BEEN EATEN TWICE AND SHAT

    • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 1:07 am

      LOL, a non-racist atheist?

      If you really are a non-racist atheist, then please explain why you don’t:
      – Acknowledge that racists atheists exist and that 100% of all White atheist countries are extremely racist
      – Criticize other racist atheists

      If atheists had strongly opposed racism is exactly what they would do, instead they just protect racists atheists from criticism and try to make atheists appear as “non-racist”

      So we can see from the atheists’ responses what atheists really care about is:
      – Preventing racists atheists from being criticized
      – Making atheists appear as “non-racist”

      Isn’t this true?

  36. Chiara / Sep 9 2012 6:26 am

    I’m sorry but THE RACIST IS YOU.
    And Sweden has a state religion, so much for atheism.
    And evolution is a fact, it’s not a belief. Besides, I can’t see how it has anything to do with racism.

    • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 12:35 am

      Only 15% of Sweden Church members believe in Jesus dumbass (http://www.thelocal.se/34370/20110615/).

      So Sweden is not an atheist country now? Why don’t you tell your racist atheist Swedish friends that, lol

      If you can’t see how evolution has anything to do with racism, then you can read Richard Lynn’s book “Race Differences in intelligence: an Evolutionary Analysis” (published March 2006)

      But I forgot, atheists don’t believe that anything is racism (like considering certain ethnic groups to be more or less intelligent).

      What do atheists consider as racism?

  37. itsnobody / Aug 13 2012 7:05 pm

    This is boring me. It looks like I’ve already won this whole debate and the primitive savage subhuman atheist mind just can’t compete with me, if your argument fits into the summary I listed when I updated this in March please don’t take the time respond.

    In conclusion atheists are definitely the lowest possible form of life, the most racist of all human beings.

    Deep deep deep down inside every part of me will always view atheists as subhuman beings for being racist.

    We can see from atheists’ responses that:
    – Atheists don’t want people to criticize or oppose the racism in atheist countries
    – Atheists will do anything to protect racist atheists from being criticized, thereby allowing racist atheists to freely be as racist as they want
    – Atheists don’t consider anything to be evidence that atheist countries are racist, but consider anything to be evidence that the US is racist (what a big joke)
    – Atheists don’t care about ending racism, they care about making atheists appear as “non-racist” people

    Why won’t atheists just acknowledge that 100% of atheist countries are extremely racist and try to end the racism in those countries for? It’s because atheists agree with and support the racism there

    So all non-racist atheists can do to show their non-racism is protect racist atheist countries from criticism? What a joke. What would happen if all the atheists who attacked me voiced some type of opposition towards racism? LOL, that will DEFINITELY never happen.

    Never will even one atheist in the whole world open up their low-life atheist mouth and oppose the racism in atheist countries. All they care about is making atheists appear as good non-racist people. Atheists will always side with their low-life atheist kind, atheists are truthfully the worst of all human beings.

    I can easily predict which countries will become racist and nationalist up next by looking at which countries have the fastest growing atheist populations:
    – Australia
    – Canada
    – The Netherlands

    These countries are up next to become as racist or possibly more racist than New Zealand or Sweden specifically because of the rise in the atheist population there.

    Once the atheist population in the US goes up to around 20% I predict that the US will probably become as racist as NZ, so there isn’t much time left unfortunately.

    Once the atheist population rises certain things occur:
    – Opposition to nationalism fades (right now nationalist politicians in the US have to fight off Churches and there is no mainstream Christian denomination that allows nationalism)
    – Opposition to racism in general fades
    – Support for scientific racism grows
    – Racists are free to be as racist as they want since there is much less criticism and opposition to racism
    – The media will start to ignore stories about racism (less criticism)

    We can see that a rise in the atheist population directly causes racism and nationalism to increase.

    We can also see from the responses from atheists here that no atheist will dare open up their low-life atheist mouth and criticize racist atheist countries. Atheists won’t even consider anything to be evidence that atheist countries are racist. Their reasoning is just laughably unfalsifiable (“the reason atheist countries aren’t racist is because nothing can be considered as evidence that atheist countries are racist”).

    So it really is the rise in the atheist population that causes there to be less criticism and opposition to racism.

    So far, every single White atheist that I’ve met has been extremely racist.

    Maybe one day I’ll meet a non-racist white atheist.

    So can any atheist answer the question as to why they always side with their atheist kind and protect racist atheist countries from criticism?

    The atheist community’s silence in opposition to racism clearly tells us where they stand on the racism issue.

    As long as the atheist kind are racist I’ll always view atheists as subhuman beings, always.

    An atheist world is just like a racist’s paradise.

    • Dustin Braden / Aug 23 2012 10:53 am

      Atheist and all sane theists, you cannot argue with him. He has already shown he will not listen to any proper argument. he is simply insane.

      • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 1:15 am

        Like, how? I’ve already destroyed all arguments too easily

        They only respond with their lame ad hominems, it’s sooo boring

  38. Bryan Barrett / Aug 11 2012 11:17 pm

    So our deffinition of an atheist/racist country is:
    Atheist country = Not secular, the beliefs of the majority or a significant majority in the country are athiest.

    All this talk and low-life atheists have still not acknowledged that 100% of atheist countries are racist.

    Country Total country -population (2004) % Atheist/Agnostic/Nonbeliever

    Sweden 8,986,000 46 – 85%
    Vietnam 82,690,000 81%
    Denmark 5,413,000 43 – 80%
    Norway 4,575,000 31 – 72%
    Japan 127,333,000 64 – 65%
    Czech Republic 10,246,100 54 – 61%
    Finland 5,215,000 28 – 60%
    France 60,424,000 43 – 54%
    South Korea 48,598,000 30 – 52%
    Germany 82,425,000 41 – 49%

    This is data is from here http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_atheist.html

    Feel free to provide another that may clear up the numbers.

    So far I don’t see that atheisim is the majority beleif in any of these countries.

    I see reference made in the blog to :

    New Zealand – (3,994,000 – 20 – 22%)
    http://www.hrc.co.nz/2011/asians-still-the-most-discriminated-against
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10345507

    Sweden – (8,986,000 – 46 – 85%)
    http://www.thelocal.se/24632/20100127/
    http://www.theweek.co.uk/politics/10525/dark-skinned-swedes-live-fear-racist-gunman

    Latvia – (Not on list)
    http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/activities/14-Public_Presentation_Paris_2005/Presentation2005_Paris_proceedings_en.pdf

    “Sweden, Denmark, and all the celebrated liberal atheist countries are racist,” or 100% of Athiest countries are rasist.

    “Denmark, Czech Republic, and every other atheist country is also racist.”

    So of the countries specifically listed, I see articles relating to discrimination for 3, but not for any others. That is not even 100% of the countries stated as racist. Also no information provided that these were related to atheism.

    Top 10 Countries
    With Highest Proportion of Atheists
    (Greeley/Jagodzinski, 1991)

    Country Percent Atheist
    East Germany 88.20%
    Slovenia 29.80
    Russia 27.30
    Israel 25.60
    Netherlands 24.10
    Hungary 23.30
    Norway 14.90
    Britain 14.00
    West Germany 12.10
    New Zealand 11.50

    These numbers are also from the same page, if someong has more recent numbers, please share them.
    Just looking at that it must mean that East Germany at the time of the survey was the most racist country in the entire world.

    I hope we can agree that racisim occurs all over the world, and many articles/studies could be bresented to demonstrate that.

    Things not demonstrated here:

    No country identified as having a majority athiestic belief
    No data showing athiesim causing more racisim in a particular country, much less than 100% of countries identified by the OP.
    No data to support the claim “this problem (racism) is directly caused by the atheist population.”
    No support given for the idea that not accepting atheists/racists as human beings unless they give up their racism, will have any effect whatsoever.

    Frequently mentioned is that “When people strongly disagree with something they voice opposition. The main reason why atheists have remained silent in opposition to racism is specifically because they agree with and support racism.”
    “The simple fact is atheists speak out against lots of things, but racism is not one of them.”
    Or perhaps the idea that White Atheists has not done enough to speak out against racism. I can only guess that any person not speaking out against racism = racist, is the position the OP is taking.

    So the absence of evidence for White Atheists speaking out against Racism = There is no evidence, thus White Atheists must be racist?

    Just as an aside: http://www.nairaland.com/121066/predominantly-atheist-countries-lowest-crime

    • itsnobody / Aug 12 2012 3:51 pm

      Your numbers are all wrong in modern times but it wouldn’t really matter much. I’m speaking of 100% of White atheist countries so it would be correct to say that “100% of White atheist countries are extremely racist”. There is no exception to this rule.

      I only listed 3 countries, but I could list studies for all White atheist countries if I wanted to.

      As for predominantly atheist countries having the lowest crime it’s just a lie, confusing correlation and causation. Estonia is an atheist country with one of the highest murder rates in Europe. Switzerland is a religious country with a lower murder rate than Denmark and Sweden, one of the lowest in Europe.

      The countries in Europe with low crime had low crime back when they were religious like the 1960s and 1970s so there’s no causal link.

      As usual the primitive savage subhuman atheist mind believes any propaganda they hear. Atheists definitely don’t understand that correlation isn’t causation. Pointing out atheist countries that happen to have lower crime is just like pointing out a coincidence, no causal link.

      • Anonymous / Oct 24 2012 12:37 pm

        There is no such thing as “100% White Atheist Countries”. The most atheist country is Sweden at 85%, as someone else said, and also, I doubt there are many “All-white” countries in existence today, if any. Atheist don’t say things like
        “Nationalism is not racism”
        “What’s wrong with being a Nazi?”
        “Racial discrimination is not racism”
        “Believing that certain ethnic groups are genetically inferior or superior in terms of intelligence is not racism”
        Because they don’t believe that. All atheists believe/don’t believe is that there is no god or deity in existence. Period.

      • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 1:23 am

        You don’t understand basic English shithead. “100% of White atheist countries” doesn’t mean “100% White atheist countries”, it means “All countries that are White atheist countries”

  39. Dustin Braden / Jul 29 2012 2:30 pm

    The person who wrote this is obviously an atheist just having fun, but I do have an answer:
    All theists are racists; there is just no denying it. You cannot name any one theist who is not racist, no, not one. You may hear stories about white (and, yes nearly all theists are white) theists who claim to have black and asiatic friends, but this is obviously not true (read sentance one).
    RSVP

    • itsnobody / Aug 12 2012 2:49 pm

      You’re just using a straw man argument dumbass.

      Thanks for demonstrating how primitive and subhuman the atheist mind is. They can’t do anything.

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 23 2012 10:54 am

        Explain why you think it is a strawman.

      • Davo / Aug 29 2012 2:00 pm

        yes, explain why it is wrong, rather than saying ‘strawman’ and insulting the other person (something you always refer to as ad hominem statements!). you have insulted people dumbass, subhuman, and so on… live up to your own ideals I would say.

      • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 1:34 am

        It’s wrong because the response simply attempts to create a straw man version of my argument with Theists instead. My argument is nothing like that. I actually provided studies indicating that atheist countries are racist and reasons clearly showing that basically all atheists are in on this racist thing together as one.

      • Dustin Braden / Jan 14 2013 2:15 pm

        That’s special pleading. The argument is the same whether you insert the word theist or atheist. Aside of this point, a modern atheist has no reason to be racist. A theist can be if he believes god gave him the right to discriminate. New Zealand’s atheism rate is more like 35% percent. Even if a majority-atheist country is racist, that does not mean that all atheists are racist. The variation among the genome of humans is only about .1 percent. A single community anywhere in the world contains in the upper nineties of percent of all diversity on earth.

      • itsnobody / Jan 14 2013 7:18 pm

        It’s not special pleading dumbass. You didn’t use my argument with Theists inserted you used your shitheaded version of the argument which is a straw man.

        I provided studies indicating that 100% of atheist countries are racist and explained how the atheist population causes racism which is nothing like your shitheaded version of the argument.

        The main reason why 100% of atheist countries are racist is mostly because once the atheist population goes up opposition towards racism ceases. Right now White Nationalists have to fight-off Churches and get laughed at by all mainstream Christian denominations. If there was no religion (specifically less Judeo-Christian religion) then White Nationalists wouldn’t have to fight off anyone.

        So the atheist population directly causes racism and White Nationalism to increase. It’s not mere correlation, it’s causation.

        There’s less variation in dogs, coyotes, and wolves than there is human beings. So dogs, coyotes, and wolves tell us that what matters isn’t the percentage difference in the genome but the significance of the genome changes. Very very very small genome changes have big effects in reality, even though they are very small genome changes.

        For Example: It’s been found recently that just ONE gene explains the vast size differences in dog breeds, even though it’s just ONE gene.
        Another Example: The greyhound breed can gain speeds up to 45mph in 6 strides or less, the average dog can run at a max speed of 17-20mph, but the greyhound breed is extremely close genetically to ALL other dog breeds

        On my article titled “Why are atheists so racist?” all of the atheists who commented agreed that evolution clearly indicates that blacks are genetically less intelligent, they said that believing so isn’t racist even though it matches the exact definition of racism. If you disagree then comment there explaining how it’s not true to your other atheist friends.

        All liberal atheists agree that intelligence varies from ethnic group to ethnic group and that Martin Luther King Jr. was just another delusional creationist reverend, ALL of them do.

        Once society as a whole accepts that certain ethnic groups are more or less intelligent justifying Nazi laws and anti-immigration laws will become extremely easy.

        It’s just a matter of time now.

        Just wait and see what happens once the atheist population rises significantly, it’s just beginning in the US, so I have to figure out a way out of this before it’s too late…

  40. Anonymous / Jul 16 2012 9:52 pm

    please! everyone! stop all the insults. we are all human here!!!!

  41. Anonymous / Jul 16 2012 9:50 pm

    I am an atheist. I am not racist. I do the right thing because I have moral, not because I am afraid of a god. The person who wrote this is the racist one, not me. He/ she is making unfair and biased assumptions about all atheists, not just the few they met. To say that just because we do not believe in a god that we are not humans is like saying that a child is a monster because she doesn’t like the color purple. This is horrible, untrue, and hurtful. It made mercy, just reading it and I hope that everyone who reads this will realize how hurtful and ridiculous this article is.
    -Outraged

    • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 1:46 am

      My assumptions are not unfair or biased.

      If atheists had actually strongly opposed racism what they would do with their low-life atheist mouth is voice opposition towards racism, instead all they do is throw personal attacks at me, prevent racist atheists from being criticized, and claim not to be racist to make themselves appear as good people or whatever, what a joke.

      I’ve listed reasons for considering atheists to be racist and none of them have to do with not believing in a god.

      Truthfully there is no group of people as terrible as the atheists, they are worst of all subhuman beings.

      Why won’t even one fuckin in the whole world answer the question as to why they don’t voice opposition towards racism, criticize other racists atheists, or even acknowledge that 100% of atheist countries are extremely racist?

      Hope your kind gets killed off by a natural disaster, you low-life racist!

  42. Anonymous / Jul 9 2012 6:48 am

    Let me start by saying that I am not an atheist (nor a murderer, terrorist or rapist for that matter), so if you could please refrain from calling me a subhuman based on any of those labels I would be much obliged (although I am curious with which name calling you will substitute this word). I followed someone’s link to this blog thinking a post with a title like this had to be sarcastic. Initially this assumption was upheld by the ridiculous sweeping statements from the first paragraphs – suffices to say this is the first time I have come into contact with you or your blog or I would have known otherwise. As I continued reading, and taking a sneak peak at the About page and comments, however, I came to the bemused conclusion that you are, in fact, serious.

    I wish you all the luck in convincing people of your superior intelligence, intuition, argumentative logic and what not – and getting someone to take you seriously for longer than a few comments.

    • itsnobody / Jan 13 2013 1:55 am

      I don’t care about convincing people of my superior intelligence or whatever like atheists do.

      I care about ending racism, and let’s face reality, once the atheist population in the US goes up it’s going to be a racist hell just like in 100% of modern day atheist countries.

      A high atheist population will ensure that opposition towards racism ceases as atheists intentionally refuse to open up their low-life mouth and voice any opposition towards racism.

  43. Dieter Hubau / Jul 4 2012 5:12 am

    Please read this, it perfectly states our (we atheists) common thoughts: http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/w06ri/a_great_friend_posted_on_fb_why_are_atheists_so/

  44. atheist / Jul 4 2012 4:16 am

    I strongly disagree with you. You dirty racist Christian. If you consider people of different beliefs “subhuman”, then what makes you different than these so called “racist atheists”? Your just as hateful as they are. I spit on God, I spit on Jesus and I spit on the bible. You piece of shit. I can’t wait until people like you die out. An atheist world would be non-racist, and beautiful. FUCK GOD.

  45. Proutzi / Jul 4 2012 3:01 am

    You seem to have a lot of faith, congratulations.

  46. itsnobody / Jun 23 2012 3:23 am

    This is boring me. Looks like atheists are basically subhuman in terms of intelligence. Their main responses have just been boring ad hominems.

    From these responses we can clearly see that atheists don’t care about ending racism, they care about making atheists appear as good non-racist people and protecting racist atheists from criticism.

    These responses from atheists have fully convinced me that as long as atheists exist racism will always be prevalent. Their utter refusal to acknowledge or criticize racist atheists clearly shows this. They’ve intentionally done this because they want racism to spread.

    Looks like it’s time for me to publish part 2 – “Atheists – Subhumans to Society”

    • Dieter Hubau / Jul 4 2012 5:21 am

      I don’t believe that The Bible, The Torah, The Koran, or any other religious text has much basis in fact.
      I am explicitly saying that there are many moral lessons and guidelines to be found in these texts, many of those which I try to live by. This does not mean I am racist. I get along with all kinds of people, whatever race, gender or religion. People I don’t get along with are retards like you who generalize everything.
      “I heard about someone who was racist in New-Zealand… He was an atheist… SO THIS MEANS ALL ATHEISTS ARE RACISTS!?!?!?” Yeah, keep believing that 🙂

  47. L / Jun 22 2012 11:29 pm

    You should be killed for being such an imbecile

    • itsnobody / Jun 23 2012 3:13 am

      Nah man I’ll continue living on to threaten the Nazi dream society atheists are planning…

      • Dustin Braden / Jan 15 2013 2:10 pm

        Nazism is deeply-rooted in Christianity.

      • itsnobody / Jan 16 2013 4:45 am

        LOL! Now I can confirm that you’re a gullible idiot. Are atheists really this stupid? Nazism is rooted in Christianity? Which historical source do you have to support his laughable assertion.

        During Hitler’s time Germany was a very religious Christian country so if the Nazis openly opposed Christianity or did not support Christianity it would’ve been political suicide and they would’ve dramatically reduced their chances of gaining power.

        Here’s some facts:
        – Martin Bormann, Nazi official nearly equivalent to Hitler in terms of power said “National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable” (this was during Hitler’s time was Germany was a very religious Christian country)
        – The Nazi party philosopher Alfred Rosenberg in his 30-point program for the National Reich Church wrote:
        “- The National Church is determined to exterminate foreign Christian faiths imported into Germany in the ill-omened year 800.
        “- The National Church demands immediate cessation of the publishing and dissemination of the Bible.
        “- The National Church will clear away from its altars all Crucifixes, Bibles and pictures of Saints.”
        – The Nazis had to fight off Churches and were not accepted

        If you don’t believe me then just ask most (if not all) Nazis what they think of Christianity.

        Once again you did just what I predicted, just changing the subject to claiming that Theists are racists or whatever.

        Answer the FUCKIN QUESTION FOR ONCE IN YOUR LOW-LIFE ATHEIST LIFE: What’s the reason that you don’t open up your low-life atheist mouth and criticize OTHER RACIST ATHEISTS?

        You’ve refused to answer.

  48. D / Jun 22 2012 5:58 pm

    To your claim ‘racism does not occur in USA’:
    “Job applicants with white names needed to send about 10 resumes to get one callback; those with African-American names needed to send around 15 resumes to get one callback.” (taken from http://www.nber.org/digest/sep03/w9873.html ). I could list dozens of empirical studies that point to the same conclusion of widespread racism in the very theist USA.

    Racism exists in every single country, including the 10 where atheists outnumber the theists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreligion), so yes, you are TRIVIALLY correct, but you CANNOT hide the fact that ipso facto all theist countries have race problems as well. This is because racism is not a simple issue that can be linked to a single cause. Certainly not to secular humanism, which aims to better the human condition by updating the bronze age morals found in the bible, the quran et al. that often advocate intolerance, even genocide, where a good person has to use their judgement to find the good verses, while the bad person can find a suitable excuse for all manner of evil. Therefore, if human judgement alone is needed, what is the use for a self-contradictory book?

    As far as the ad hominem attacks against you are concerned, that is inexcusable in a polite intelligent discourse, however given how offensive and profoundly stupid your contribution is, you’ve disqualified yourself from the protections afforded to those, who do their research and are able to digest it.

  49. Anonymous / May 25 2012 10:29 am

    You said something about not being able to believe in evolution (by which you probably meant survival of the fittest) without being racist. That is a very racist comment. I am a white atheist who is not racist. Some of my best friends are of other racs. Countries with more atheists (such as France and Estonia) generallyy are less racist and criminal. There are many black, indian and asian atheists, too.According to science, there is almost no difference between the races. Humans have very little genetic diversity. Aso, terrorists and rapists are humans. they should be punished, but not killed or tortured.Every human deserves some rights.

    • itsnobody / Jun 23 2012 2:58 am

      Evolution doesn’t mean survival of the fittest dumbass. Evolution refers to the change in species overtime.

      Perhaps you were referring to something like natural selection, which just says that nature selects traits that makes a species more likely to survive.

      Once again it’s the same response predicted, claim not be a racist but give no reason (except for you say your friends aren’t racist, lol). And you also say that Estonia and France are not racist, lol. So your whole argument is “I say that atheists and atheist countries are not racist”.

      Instead of being delusional, just face reality.

      “there is less mtDNA difference between dogs, wolves, and coyotes than there is between the various ethnic groups of human beings, which are recognized as a single species” (Coppinger & Schneider, 1995)

      Based on mtDNA differences it would be easy to categorize Australoids, sub-Saharan West Africans, other humans, and Neanderthals as separate humanoid species.

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 1 2012 3:03 pm

        To start with, I apologize; you clearly know a tiny amount more about evolution than I previously thought. However, I would appreciate it if you would refrain from calling me a “dumbass”. Evolution is not survival of the fittest, but since you are so misinformed about atheism and evolution (you also mistakenly connect the two), I figured that you would make this common mistake. This is not an ad hominen attack, as I will now address your points. I do not dispute that dogs, wolves and coyotes could be considered the same species if you look at the mtdna. However, I think you just made up the supposed fact that different human races could be considered very different. While they broke off mitochondrarily much longer ago than coyotes, dogs and wolves, they are still very similar, even within the same subspecies (the canines’ mtdna is probably only this similar due to interbreeding), and the canines are of different subspecies.
        If you will not take my word that France and Estonia are non-racist, meet a few French and Estonians and read the laws of their countries. Also, you have made a hypothesis that is not very scientific. Here is it boiled-down:
        All atheists are racist. If they try to deny this, therefore they are liars (see sentence one).

      • itsnobody / Aug 12 2012 2:48 pm

        lol, thanks for your low-life response.

        It’s debatable whether there are different races or not, it seems that the more we know the easier it is to classify human beings as separate races. It’s debatable within the biology community.

        Obviously the liberal atheist side will side with separate races.

        Why the fuck would I take your word for? Estonia has one of the highest murder rates in Europe and you claimed there was less crime there, lol.

        How is the hypothesis not scientific? ALL of the studies clearly show that 100% of atheist countries are racist.

      • Davo / Aug 29 2012 2:07 pm

        “there is less mtDNA difference between dogs, wolves, and coyotes than there is between the various ethnic groups of human beings, which are recognized as a single species” (Coppinger & Schneider, 1995)

        Based on mtDNA differences it would be easy to categorize Australoids, sub-Saharan West Africans, other humans, and Neanderthals as separate humanoid species.

        What do you want to say with this? If we consider each other as different species, racism (as in segregation of races) would even more prevail? I’m not sure why you write this…

  50. anythingbuttheist / May 22 2012 9:18 pm

    This is one of the dumbest things I ever read.

    • itsnobody / Jun 23 2012 2:50 am

      Like how? Oh wait I forgot atheists don’t give reasons to support their assertions, just ad hominems

      • Trevor Garrett Allen / Jun 26 2012 2:45 am

        I’m hoping this is a joke or an elaborate troll. The thought of atheism and racism going hand in hand is absurd. There are a lot of instances where you beg the question(in the litteral sense not the misused sense) backing up statements with MANY SOURCES while providing one source for each instance.

        I am not racist nor am I reverse rasist and it perplexes me that people are. I sort of understand why people can be, not in the way that its right, but through upbringing some learn what they are taught. I’m not condoning it, I’m saying coming across many walks of life there are racist and I understand they were brought up so. I what I’ saying is that I understand that racism Which goes to my second point religion.

        Religion is a taught belief (just like racism) that you are entitled to have but aren’t necessarily true.
        All religions are taught. I personally grew up very religious every time I went to church I got the chills and thought it was god speaking to me. There are many people that are religious probably more so percentage wise that are racist, than there are racist atheist.

        You say

        “When people strongly disagree with something they voice opposition. The main reason why atheists have remained silent in opposition to racism is specifically because they agree with and support racism.”

        Where is you supporting argument here?

        Many people that are atheist support many civil liberties, so you can’t bind the two together.

        Also you say”

        “The survey, conducted annually by UMR Insight Ltd since 2000, showed that 77 per cent of New Zealanders consider that Asians are discriminated against more than any other group. This figure is up from 75 per cent in 2009 and 74 per cent in 2008″

        I think that more than that in America would say that blacks are discriminated against this dose not mean if you think blacks are discriminated against you are actually discriminating against them.

        This just goes to show that smart people aren’t always right.

        P.S. Please understand when I use the word you that I mean it in the general sense not because I don’t personally know you and can’t begin to judge what kind of person you are. Except this just because you blog about something does not mean it’s true and if this was a thesis paper I’d give you a “C” on it due to your lack of proper sources not your ability to type words. I personally think religion breeds racism and using religion as a basis of an argument is starting with failed logic.

      • itsnobody / Aug 12 2012 3:02 pm

        @Trevor Garrett Allen the only thing I’m hoping is a joke is your terribly weak response.

        Your arguments fit into exactly what I predicted in this article (which I’m sure you and the other atheists never read):
        – Claim not to be racist, but give no reason as to how
        – Change the subject to claiming that Theists are racist
        – Claim that nothing can be considered as evidence that atheist countries are racist

        Since you won’t consider anything to be evidence that New Zealand is racist (like studies), then all you’re saying is “the reason New Zealand isn’t racist is because nothing can be considered as evidence that New Zealand is racist”…what a great joke argument

        It’s no surprise that atheists will always protect their atheist kind from being criticized for being racist, that’s the type of people that atheists are.

        Racist atheists know that other atheists will ALWAYS protect them from criticism so they are free to be as racist as they desire knowing that they won’t have to deal with any type of criticism or opposition.

        You low-life atheists don’t really care about ending racism, you care about protecting your own atheist kind from being criticized for being racist.

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 3 2012 9:20 pm

        Well, for one, you claim that all atheists and atheist countries are terribly racist without giving any other reasons than “I said so.” Any claim that can be put forth without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. And please don’t just attempt to refute my comment by calling my intelligence “subhuman”.

      • itsnobody / Aug 12 2012 2:53 pm

        Do you enjoy lieing or are you this delusional? I’ve provided studies indicating that they are racist dumbass

        You’re just using the same response predicted “claim that nothing can be considered as evidence that atheist countries are racist”

        Wow, what a great argument…so tell me what is the reason that you don’t consider anything to be evidence that atheist countries are racist?

  51. Anonymous / May 20 2012 12:59 pm

    Atheists, agnostics and irreligious, you cannot argue with these people. They are relusional and have been indocrinated into the worst type of relusion: millitant theism. No matter what you say, their minds will never change.

    • itsnobody / Jun 23 2012 2:51 am

      I can argue with them and always win…but usually since atheists are basically subhumans in terms of intelligence all they’ll do in response is throw ad hominems or personal attacks without refutations, it’s so boring and repetitive

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 1 2012 7:39 pm

        You’re proving his point.

  52. Anthony Clark / Apr 26 2012 1:33 pm

    It is funny how this term racist/atheist has spread over the net. I have heard this come from many chat rooms and people who are religious. The problem I have with this blog, is the lack of facts based on no reliable links or statistics to support his statements. But here is one fact. Atheist are looked upon negatively as much as criminals and rapist. That is sad. http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2011/12/14/religious-believers-dont-trust-atheists-says-new-study/

    • itsnobody / Jun 23 2012 2:53 am

      What do you mean? The links to the studies are all there, sorry for your delusions. The atheist media tries to keep all the studies showing atheist countries as being racist hidden.

      I’m guessing that you’re going to use the same atheistic argument “nothing can be considered as evidence that atheist countries are racist”

      How boring.

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 3 2012 9:21 pm

        All where?

  53. ufclesnar11cena / Apr 15 2012 3:47 am

    Hello, good sir. It is quite interesting of how 100% of your written blogs are all about how or why Atheism should be prosecuted, criticized, or challenged. Most of your arguments are total nonsense, as you are citing reasons with no back up at all, such as in this one blog.
    You may be in need of some mental help, since you seem so mad and obsessed with this, maybe the racist one here is someone else?
    Also, there’s no such thing as “100% Atheist” countries. Atheism is still a minority, rapidly growing, but still minority.
    By the way, you are terrible troll.

    Good day.

    • itsnobody / Jun 23 2012 3:02 am

      How is it nonsense? I’ve provided the links to the studies and racist events in this article.

      So the only conclusion is that you’re just in denial.

      The main reason why atheists don’t want to acknowledge that 100% of atheist countries are racist is specifically because they agree with and support the racism going on there.

  54. Anonymous / Mar 30 2012 3:17 am

    New Zealand is actually full of non-racist atheists. You do realise most racism in America is directed towards mainly the non-white population right? That’s likely why you’ve never experienced it.

    Being Atheist doesn’t make you any less human than anybody else. In fact, you being judgmental and stereotyping Atheists is likely a form of Racism. If you want to be taken seriously, don’t be a hypocrite on these topics.

    • itsnobody / Jun 23 2012 3:04 am

      Wow what a great response, you claim that NZ is full of non-racist atheists, lol. So your argument is just that NZ doesn’t have racist atheists because “I say so”.

      I guess all the studies showing NZ to be full of racism must be wrong, lol.

      I’m a non-white male dumb ass and the US is definitely one of the least racist countries in the world.

      If anyone here reading this is from NZ then deep deep down I don’t consider you or any of your other low-life racist atheist friends as human beings.

      • Anonymous / Jul 4 2012 4:29 am

        I’m not taking anyone seriously when they write “lol” in an argument, that shows you are not capable of having a intellectual conversation. By they way why are you getting so butthurt

      • Anonymous / Jul 4 2012 5:05 pm

        Really, the US isn’t racist? The whole period of 1850-1960 with the enslaving of the African people and mistreatment come the later part of the 20th century? Sorry, you’re skin isn’t white, please relocate to the back of the bus. That’s not racism? Racism is still thriving in today’s society, and you refuse to acknowledge it due to the blindfold your religion has strapped around your thoughtless brain. You also mentioned Canada as being a racist country, when back in the 1900’s Canada helped to rescue slaves from their lives of mistreatment they experienced in good ol’ racist America.

        P.S. You’re writing skill is equivalent to that of a 12 year olds, and a majority of your citations add little to no friction to your side of the argument.

        P.P.S. I’m pretty sure you’re a troll, but I’m replying only because there is a sliver of possibility that you are truly this ignorant, and that saddens me so much that I hope my response can open some form of a window so you can see logic and reasoning from a sober second view.

  55. appalled athiest / Mar 10 2012 3:13 am

    You are a joke. Eat a bowl of dicks, you uneducated, small minded worm! You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and you deserve all of the ridicule you receive. Good day.

    • itsnobody / Jun 23 2012 3:08 am

      Like how? Your ad hominems have no effect on me dumbass.

      Once again another baseless comment from the subhuman atheist.

  56. Unamused / Feb 22 2012 1:00 am

    I’m not sure we should consider Africans human beings, but at least I have a coherent explanation. You’re just mad that some people refuse to accept your delusions about race and gods.

    • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:00 am

      Yeah well at least you can agree that you’re a racist unlike the other atheists who just pretend not to be racist.

      So at least you can agree that you’re a low-life.

  57. joerhea / Feb 14 2012 10:00 am

    Is this a joke? What a moron this guy is. His arguments are false, make no sense, and just plain stupid. I am not even remotely angered by this because of just how stupid it really is. But I will share it, because I want people out there to see just how ignorant people really are when it comes to atheists, and atheism. Wow I am almost laughing at this. The best part, there is no name attached to it. What a coward he is!!!

    • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:03 am

      Wow….here’s your argument “Man I say this guy is a moron, yeah, and I say that his arguments are false, yeah and I say that he is a coward”

      WOW!!!! What an amazing argument arising from the subhuman mind.

      Well what more can we expect from the subhuman atheist mind, it’s almost as if they are incapable of thinking, they just throw personal attacks at me because they know that other atheists are so gullible and idiotic that they’ll really believe that throwing personal attacks is equivalent to refuting something.

      It’s so boring.

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 1 2012 7:42 pm

        You are quite hypocritical. You talk about ad hominen attacks, but when someone raises a point you simply call them “subhuman” and “dumbass”, without answering them.

  58. Richard Eis / Feb 7 2012 4:16 am

    I’m just glad that I live in the US, which is one of the least racist countries in comparison to all others

    Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah……… Oh man, you live in one of the WORST countries for racism in terms of both history and current oppression of minorities.

    • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:08 am

      lol….I’m not talking about historically fool (atheist, it’s the same thing), I’m talking about in MODERN TIMES.

      But wait I forgot…it’s the same atheistic reasoning “The reason that the US or any religious country is racist is because since I’m a low-life atheist I consider anything to be evidence that the US is racist…but the reason that atheist countries aren’t racist is because since I’m a low-life atheist I don’t consider anything to be evidence that atheist countries are racist”

      So Mr.Fool using your subhuman atheist mind explain to me why you don’t consider atheist countries to be racist but the US to be racist?

      • Anonymous / Jul 4 2012 3:39 am

        So you don’t like it when people insult you and use ad hominem attacks, but it’s perfectly OK for you to tell atheists that they are subhuman, lowlife fools?

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 2 2012 11:18 am

        Through all you ad hominens, I think I have found your point. You are wrong; there is quite a bit of racism in modern America. For example, just look at the conviction rate of whites, blacks and latinos in cases of the same crime and equal evidence. Look at the execution rate. Also, in the 2008 republican nomination campaign, McCain’s opponents told people in the deep south that McCain had spawned a black child to get them not to vote for him. In an many churches, not just Morman, but Lutheran, Baptist and Methodist, there are whites-only parties and meetings.
        Also, any of this is extremely rare in countries with a sizable irreligious population, such as France, Denmark, Estonia, Sweden and Denmark. There are also far fewer race-related hate-crimes in these countries. Denmark is the happiest, Sweden has the second-highest standard of living (after Luxembourg), and Estonia gives the most personal freedoms and the most equality of any nation on Earth. Also, as the amount of atheism in a country increases, the amount of overall crime and bigotry decreases. (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/our-humanity-naturally/201103/misinformation-and-facts-about-secularism-and-religion) The USA, being majority-theist, has much more racism and crime.

  59. SSG Dent / Feb 7 2012 3:01 am

    Hi im a White Athiest. My bestfriend is black and my wife is Korean. Most of my family is Cathlic. For the longest time i was too. I can honastly say that i dissagre with racism. It is a problem. Yes its true that some athiests are racist. Saying all athiests are racist is like saying the Vatican never covered up the priests molesting those little boys.

    • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:13 am

      This is getting boring it’s the same responses from atheists.

      Yours falls into this category: Claiming that atheists are not racist but giving no reasoning or explanation as to how.

      • Anonymous / Jul 4 2012 4:35 am

        You don’t have any evidence explanations or reasoning either.

  60. Anonymous / Feb 6 2012 6:40 pm

    So you hate racists and atheists but not atheists that aren’t racist. Why not just say that you hate racists. Another thing that should be pointed out is that the majority of the top minds in America are atheists and if you don’t consider them citizens I don’t think they will stay in America very long.
    It’s fine (although bit to healthy) to gave this little fantasy but you need to think of the real world repercussions that would occur if this actually happened.

    • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:52 am

      Well if I just say I hate racists it wouldn’t really motivate any atheist to speak out against racism.

      Just look at them, they intentionally refuse to criticize racists atheists and racist atheist countries, all they do is celebrate them.

      On the other hand the “Christian Identity” people receive so much criticism from the mainstream Christian groups that many end up abandoning Christianity all together or just stay faraway from all mainstream Christian groups.

  61. Andrew / Feb 6 2012 12:54 am

    “just as how society does not accept terrorists, murderers, or rapists as human beings”

    I don’t know which society you’re talking about but it isn’t mine. You need professional help.

    • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:53 am

      lol not tolerating terrorists and rapists means I need professional help? ROFL

      I don’t want to tolerate rape like Swedes and New Zealanders do….

      Why should I consider them as human beings for?

      • Anonymous / Mar 30 2012 3:22 am

        Since when did New Zealand tolerate rape? They take it just as seriously as any 1st world country. You’ve apparently violated your own rules of arguments. You’ve stated something without any proper facts to support your claim. I know that they take it seriously because i’ve sat through lectures from people who deal with these kinds of things. IN NEW ZEALAND.

  62. Chris P / Feb 5 2012 11:49 pm

    You sound a lot like Hitler – he was always trying to marginalize groups he didn’t like. Killed millions too.

    • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:11 am

      Sound like a Hitler? You must have me mistaken with the atheists like Tom Metzger.

      Hitler wasn’t anti-Nazi or anti-racist fool. The ones who are Nazis and Nazi supporters are the atheists in Sweden, Denmark, and every other atheist country.

      The main reason why atheists always have and always will remain silent in opposition to racism is specifically because they agree with and support racism.

  63. Anonymous / Feb 5 2012 9:46 pm

    OP is a troll.

  64. Vali Olteanu / Feb 4 2012 11:23 pm

    LOL, Russia is a atheist country? In what cesspool have you lived until now? In what kind of cave?
    “”According to a poll[which?] by the Russian Public Opinion Research Center, 63% of respondents considered themselves Russian Orthodox, 6% of respondents considered themselves Muslim and less than 1% considered themselves either Buddhist, Catholic, Protestant or Jewish.[6] Another 12% said they believe in God, but did not practice any religion, and 16% said they are non-believers.[6]””
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Russia

    And by the way, if just because Sweden (1.1/100000) has a litlle higher crime rate that Switzerland (0.9/100000) it means that is because in Sweden there are more atheist then because USA has 4 time higher crime rate than Sweden that surlley means that i’s the christian’s fault. Memorize this, your US of fucking A has 4 time higher crime rate, with all your christian faith, americans comit more crimes that any other civilizated country. US crime rate is similar to Turkey, Tadjikistan, Yemen or Pakistan , and we all know how many atheist live in this countries.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

    Educate yourself or die stupid!

  65. Anonymous / Feb 1 2012 8:29 pm

    this felt like a 5th graders essay…. and why do all atheists have to be racist? Im not racist but i dont believe in god, i have many friends of different colors creeds and lifestyles and i accept their differences.

    • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:23 am

      lol is a 5th graders essay your best response? It’s just another argument ad hominem.

      Don’t worry though since atheists are idiotic gullible people they’ll really believe that throwing personal attacks at me is equivalent to refuting an argument.

      Like if I say “If I think that General Relativity felt like an idea thought up by a 5th grader then obviously that refutes General Relativity”

      I don’t really expect the subhuman atheist mind to understand what an argumentum ad hominem is, it’s just too difficult for the subhuman atheist to understand.

      • Anonymous / Jul 4 2012 4:41 am

        So its okay for you to personally attack someone but when we comment on nazi ideals its not?

  66. itsnobody / Jan 31 2012 7:03 am

    Man this is boring me now.

    Here’s a summary of all the comments I’ve responded to so far:
    – Change the subject to claiming that Theists are racists (in order to prevent people from criticizing racist atheists)
    – Not consider anything to be evidence that atheist countries are racist, but consider anything to be evidence to religious countries are racist
    – Refuse to acknowledge that 100% of atheist countries are racist
    – Refuse to acknowledge that any racist atheists exist
    – Claim not to be racist, but give no reasoning as to how you can believe in evolution and that the physical brain is the mind and not be a racist

    Anyone who reads the comments from atheists can clearly see why I consider atheists to be subhuman in terms of intelligence.

    We can see that atheists intentionally refuse to criticize racist atheists or racist atheist countries because they strongly agree with and support racism.

    Their refusal to criticize racist atheists is what allows the racism to spread and continue on and on.

    Nazis/atheists rejoice!

    And if any atheist/racist is reading this I sincerely hope you and all your other low-life atheist/racist friends stop being racist.

    • Don Cameron / Feb 6 2012 2:26 pm

      If you’re so bored why do you do this?

      • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:41 am

        Well I expected some type of challenge from atheists since they claim to be so smart, but I guess it’s just no challenge at all.

        Atheists are basically subhuman in terms of intelligence, just the read the comments here.

    • Anonymous / Feb 6 2012 6:42 pm

      Please tell me you aren’t over the age of like 9

      • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:41 am

        I’m definitely over the age of 9….but your comment is just another substance-less ad hominem

  67. Me / Jan 24 2012 1:15 pm

    Some of the biggest racists in the world are US Christians: fact.

    • Anonymous / Jan 24 2012 1:36 pm

      Over all no matter what you believe there are racists in every religion not just those that are atheist.

      • itsnobody / Jan 30 2012 4:32 pm

        Over all no matter what the subhuman atheist mind believes I already acknowledged that racists theists exist.

        So now why can’t atheists acknowledge that racist atheists exist, that atheists are the most hateful racist people and the lowest possible form of life for?

        Why can’t atheists even acknowledge that 100% of atheist countries are racist?

        Their only response has been that “nothing can be considered as evidence that atheist countries are racist, but anything can be considered as evidence that the US or any religious country is racist”

        They’ve intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism specifically because they agree with and support racism.

        They’ve intentionally remained silent in opposition to racist atheist countries specifically because they agree with and support racism.

        They’ve intentionally protected racist atheists from criticism specifically because they agree with and support racism.

        These comments from atheists only re-confirm why I will always view atheists as subhumans rather than as humans.

    • itsnobody / Jan 30 2012 4:26 pm

      Why didn’t you subhumans read what I wrote for?

      I said I acknowledge that Theist racists exist and criticize them, so why can’t atheists acknowledge that racist atheists exist and criticize them?

      Oh wait I forgot, all white atheists in general are racists so they intentionally remain silent in opposition to racism, isn’t this true?

      • Richard Eis / Feb 7 2012 4:41 am

        – Claim not to be racist, but give no reasoning as to how you can believe in evolution and that the physical brain is the mind and not be a racist

        So because I know the brain is the mind, i’m racist? Sorry but you will have to fill in a few more details on that non-existent connection. Why don’t you use that “stunning” logical intuition you keep raving about.

        They’ve intentionally protected racist atheists from criticism specifically because they agree with and support racism.

        Perhaps these atheists are mocking you because you keep stating facts without ANY evidence whatsoever. More so when they already know that any evidence you did present would show that you were exactly and opposingly wrong.

        Oh and running around calling specific groups of people subhuman then complaining of supposed “racism” in others is pretty funny. There is a beam in your eye, you might want that looked at.

      • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:49 am

        So because I know the brain is the mind, i’m racist? Sorry but you will have to fill in a few more details on that non-existent connection. Why don’t you use that “stunning” logical intuition you keep raving about.

        Uhhh…it’s quite easy to understand the brain is the mind tell us that intelligence can be determined by brain size and brain structure, evolution tells us that different ethnic groups evolved to have different brain sizes and brain structures, so these two beliefs tell us that different ethnic groups are genetically more or less intelligent.

        Perhaps these atheists are mocking you because you keep stating facts without ANY evidence whatsoever. More so when they already know that any evidence you did present would show that you were exactly and opposingly wrong.

        Oh and running around calling specific groups of people subhuman then complaining of supposed “racism” in others is pretty funny. There is a beam in your eye, you might want that looked at.

        Like which fact is without evidence then fool? I already provided studies showing the countries to be racist.

        Calling someone subhuman isn’t racist fool, calling someone subhuman because of their race would be racist.

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 1 2012 7:47 pm

        “So now why can’t atheists acknowledge that racist atheists exist, that atheists are the most hateful racist people and the lowest possible form of life for?”

        “Why can’t atheists even acknowledge that 100% of atheist countries are racist?”
        Because they aren’t.

    • itsnobody / Jan 30 2012 4:45 pm

      It’s the same strategy from the subhuman atheist mind that I mentioned in this article – changing the subject to claiming that Theists are racists instead of acknowledging that atheists are most disgusting racist people in existence or even acknowledging that any atheists are racist

  68. Me / Jan 24 2012 1:14 pm

    Mate, you need help. You have very little understanding of, well, anything.

    • itsnobody / Jan 30 2012 6:56 pm

      Well then “mate” why don’t you try to help me understand with your subhuman atheist mind?

      When I see a white atheist walking down the street I think in my mind “What a great joy it would be if this person stopped being racist or a natural disaster just came and killed that person off”.

      I mean virtually nothing will get any white atheists to give up their racism so it would really be better if a natural disaster just killed them off.

      How can anyone live being as disgusting as a person as an atheist is?

      • Richard Eis / Feb 7 2012 4:45 am

        How can anyone live being as disgusting as a person as an atheist is?

        Well, I could want people dead merely because they haven’t heard about my god. That would be pretty sick.

        I’ll take a supposed racist over a murderer.

  69. Erica (@ohaidrargyrum) / Jan 24 2012 12:45 pm

    Atheism is not a sect or religion. Atheism is a relgion insomuch as not collecting stamps is a hobby. See how that doesn’t work? Atheism isn’t an organized relgion so atheists do not follow a list of commandments causing them to be racist. I’m an Atheist, and I don’t care what your race or religion is. I do care that you’re an idiot though because only a moron would speak out against racism while simultaneously discriminating against others.

    • itsnobody / Jan 30 2012 9:55 pm

      Well then Ms.Fool can you point out where I claimed that atheism was a religion? It’s just another straw man that has arisen from the subhuman atheist mind.

      As for your statement about you not being racist you’ve still failed to explain how you can believe in evolution and that the brain is the mind and not be a racist.

      What’s wrong with discriminating against murderers, rapists, terrorists, and racists? Oh wait NZ and Sweden have high rape rates so I guess they must not discriminate against rapists lol

    • natasotklat / Feb 5 2012 2:48 am

      That’s really well said.
      I agree, only an absolute MORON would talk about racism or any form of discrimination while discriminating against a group of people in the process.

      I think everyone can completely agree that the person who wrote this stupid blog is an absolute moron.

      • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 3:56 am

        lol….calling me a moron is just an argumentum ad hominem. But just like I said understanding what an ad hominem is might just be too difficult for atheists.

        Discriminating against a group doesn’t make you racist fool, discriminating against groups based on race is what would make you racist.

        Using your reasoning people who discriminate against murderers and rapists are racists. Why don’t we just not punish murderers and rapists because that’s discrimination?

        Calling me a moron or agreeing that I’m a moron doesn’t refute any statement I made. Why can’t atheists understand this?

  70. Sugarcane / Jan 24 2012 6:59 am

    I’m an atheist and I’m certainly not a racist. My ex wife is indian, my brother is married to a chinese girl, my other to a polish girl. My whole family are atheist, and racism is something we’re all vocally against.

    Your statement troubles me:
    “These people called “atheists” are truthfully the worse people you will ever find. Anyone who knows an atheist knows the type of people that they are.”

    This statement in itself is incredibly bigoted. A huge sweeping generalisation. Have you met all atheists? Aside from their non-belief in God, what possible traits can you see? I mean, most people I know are atheist, but that trait isn’t what connects us. It’s not even talked about. We have some things in common, some other things not in common. Some are perhaps perceived as better people than others.

    So tell me, on what basis are atheists “the worse people you will ever find?” That’s quite an easy statement to refute. Firstly, nations with a lower uptake of religious beliefs are simply better countries to live in – higher standards of living, better social structures, lower crime rates, better healthcare services etc. More atheists in a given society means that particular society functions better than ones with a greater uptake of religious beliefs.

    I don’t think atheists are any more likely to be bad people than a religious person. And, it’s easy to see that a religious person does in fact have a higher chance of being a bad person – religious people are not at all known for their tolerance, primarily in the form of bigotry against the gay community for one thing, and also highlighted in your utter contempt for atheists. I mean, you’re hating an entire section of society, purely for their lack of belief. Surely you must see how that is neither nice nor any better than someone being a racist.

    It’s also worth noting that the worst places to live in the world, the places with the poorest conditions, the places with the most violence, death, crime and other negative behaviours, are the most religious places. Religious societies are not caring, but judgmental, divisive and unjust.

    • itsnobody / Jan 30 2012 10:02 pm

      All this talk and low-life atheists have still not acknowledged that 100% of atheist countries are racist. So why can’t you acknowledge that for?

      I guess atheists are in denial.

      Being in interracial relationships doesn’t mean that you’re non-racist. I know lots of people in interracial relationships who have racist beliefs.

      How can you believe in evolution and that the physical brain is the mind and not be a racist?

      The rest of your rant was just changing the subject to claiming that Theists are racists.

      What do you mean the worst places are religious? You mean like the US and Switzerland? Switzerland has a LOWER murder rate than Sweden. Since Switzerland is much more religious than Sweden and since in the atheist’s fantasy world correlation is causation we should conclude that the reason why Switzerland has a lower murder rate is because they are more religious.

      BTW the super-religious super-genius mathematician Leonhard Euler is from Switzerland. Most modern day mathematical notation comes from him. Sweden has a higher population size than Switzerland, but which super-genius ever came from Sweden?

      The Bernoulli brothers are also Swiss.

      I guess Switzerland > Sweden

      The worst places to live (for non-white males) are atheist countries. Oh wait I forgot, atheists don’t consider daily racism to be immoral or non-peaceful, only violence to be not peaceful.

      Why can’t any atheist name even one non-racist atheist country? There is no such thing.

      • Sugarcane / Mar 5 2012 3:56 am

        You need to clarify: what is an atheist country? I’m unaware of a single country on the face of the planet that is 100% atheist. You’d be hard pushed to find a 50% atheistic country. Perhaps you simply mean secular? In that case, the US is supposedly a secular nation (separation of church and state and all that) yet it has clear racial problems.

        So in that sense, your argument falls flat at the first hurdle. Like all of your arguments on this blog, it’s built on an incredibly shoddy foundation and like your belief in God, is based on 100% assumption.

        As for racism, it exists in every civilisation on the planet, and you cannot attribute such a sweeping generalisation to someone being an atheist. I’m an atheist, and I’m not racist. I have met atheists that are racist. I have met believers that are racist. The two simply aren’t linked.

        It’s a very flawed argument to link racism to atheism and has no basis in reality. There’s no logical reason to equate the two. And seeing how atheism is on the rise, and racism is on the decline, it’s easy to suggest that the complete opposite of your argument is true.

        It’s long been known that religious beliefs increase the likelihood of bigotry and intolerance of all kinds – look at heavily religious countries and you see countries less accepting of gays, other religions and other races. The Middle East is a great example of this intolerance – you have nearly 100% religious uptake, and systemic homophobia, racism and intolerance of other religions.

        – How can you believe in evolution and that the physical brain is the mind and not be a racist?

        Ok here’s where the problem lies in your “logic” – you’ve made an incredibly bizarre leap, equating evolution to racism… which is perhaps the oddest argument I’ve ever come across. How does accepting evolution create racist beliefs? If anything the opposite should be true, simply because accepting evolution is to accept we’re all related.

        – The rest of your rant was just changing the subject to claiming that Theists are racists.

        No I didn’t simple “rant” about theists being racists. Did you even bother to read my comment?

        – What do you mean the worst places are religious? You mean like the US and Switzerland? Switzerland has a LOWER murder rate than Sweden. Since Switzerland is much more religious than Sweden and since in the atheist’s fantasy world correlation is causation we should conclude that the reason why Switzerland has a lower murder rate is because they are more religious.

        The most religious countries in the world, countries lik Ethiopia, for example, are terrible places to live. Also look at the Middle East. The differences between countries in the west, like Switzerland and Sweden, are pretty small. Both countries have an incredibly low murder rate, say, compared to the US – which is off the scale in terms of murders. If you were to draw a graph with the murder rates, you’d see that the countries with the highest murder rates are more religious.

        – The worst places to live (for non-white males) are atheist countries. Oh wait I forgot, atheists don’t consider daily racism to be immoral or non-peaceful, only violence to be not peaceful.

        Simply not true. Are you seriously suggesting that living in Ethiopia is better than living in, say Holland? Are you kidding me?

      • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 4:38 am

        I didn’t really think anyone could drop to this level of stupidity but I guess Sugarcane did.

        You need to clarify: what is an atheist country? I’m unaware of a single country on the face of the planet that is 100% atheist. You’d be hard pushed to find a 50% atheistic country. Perhaps you simply mean secular? In that case, the US is supposedly a secular nation (separation of church and state and all that) yet it has clear racial problems.

        I need to clarify what an atheist country is? You had no problem claiming that the more atheists in a society means a higher standard of living, lower crime, etc…but now you need to know what an atheist country is? You can just look at the statistics Richard Lynn uses or you can look up a list of atheist countries.

        I don’t mean secular shithead, I mean the beliefs of the majority or a significant majority in the country, so tell me why do you consider the US to be racist but not atheist countries?

        So in that sense, your argument falls flat at the first hurdle. Like all of your arguments on this blog, it’s built on an incredibly shoddy foundation and like your belief in God, is based on 100% assumption.

        The argument falls because you consider the US to be racist and you consider the US to be secular? Well that makes no sense at all. If the US is labeled as an atheist country by you and has clear racial problems how would that make my argument fall?

        As for racism, it exists in every civilisation on the planet, and you cannot attribute such a sweeping generalisation to someone being an atheist. I’m an atheist, and I’m not racist. I have met atheists that are racist. I have met believers that are racist. The two simply aren’t linked.

        Yeah it’s the same argument I heard before…claim not to be racist but give no explanation as to how you can believe in evolution and that the brain is the mind and not be racist.

        Your argument is just “I say that I’m not a racist”.

        It’s a very flawed argument to link racism to atheism and has no basis in reality. There’s no logical reason to equate the two. And seeing how atheism is on the rise, and racism is on the decline, it’s easy to suggest that the complete opposite of your argument is true.

        How? I linked evolution and the brain being the mind directly to racism and already explained how it’s directly linked to racism.

        So are you trying to argue that you don’t believe in evolution or that the brain is the mind?

        It’s long been known that religious beliefs increase the likelihood of bigotry and intolerance of all kinds – look at heavily religious countries and you see countries less accepting of gays, other religions and other races. The Middle East is a great example of this intolerance – you have nearly 100% religious uptake, and systemic homophobia, racism and intolerance of other religions.

        Lol the least religious countries are the most racist and religious beliefs increases the likelihood of intolerance?

        The more religious are by far less racist, just ask any non-white male living there. Oh wait I forgot “Nothing can be considered as evidence that atheist countries are racist, but anything can be considered as evidence that religious countries are racist”

        Ok here’s where the problem lies in your “logic” – you’ve made an incredibly bizarre leap, equating evolution to racism… which is perhaps the oddest argument I’ve ever come across. How does accepting evolution create racist beliefs? If anything the opposite should be true, simply because accepting evolution is to accept we’re all related.

        Bizarre leap?

        Why don’t you ask your atheist friends like Richard Lynn, James D. Watson, or Richard Dawkins about this bizarre leap?

        The brain being the mind tells us that we can determine intelligence by brain size and brain structure.
        Evolution tells us that different ethnic groups evolved to have different brain sizes and brain structures.

        “there is less mtDNA difference between dogs, wolves, and coyotes than there is between the various ethnic groups of human beings, which are recognized as a single species.” (Coppinger & Schneider, 1995)

        “There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so” – The most celebrated liberal atheist of all time, James D. Watson, October 2007

        “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really” – James D. Watson, October 2007

        “there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but people who have to deal with black employees find this not true” – James D. Watson, October 2007

        No I didn’t simple “rant” about theists being racists. Did you even bother to read my comment?

        Did you ever read your own comment? You talked about how you thought atheists were such great people and how religious countries were more intolerant and racist.

        The most religious countries in the world, countries lik Ethiopia, for example, are terrible places to live. Also look at the Middle East. The differences between countries in the west, like Switzerland and Sweden, are pretty small. Both countries have an incredibly low murder rate, say, compared to the US – which is off the scale in terms of murders. If you were to draw a graph with the murder rates, you’d see that the countries with the highest murder rates are more religious.

        Except that correlation isn’t causation dumbass. Pointing out religious countries that are poor is just like pointing out a murderer who drinks water. Does drinking water cause you to become a murderer (causation), or was the murderer someone who just happens to drink water (correlation)?

        Sweden, Denmark, and all the celebrated liberal atheist countries (that are extremely racist) had low crime rates long before they were atheistic. So this clearly shows us that the reason atheist countries have low crime rates is DESPITE their atheist population not BECAUSE of their atheist population.

        There’s no causation, just mere correlation.

        Simply not true. Are you seriously suggesting that living in Ethiopia is better than living in, say Holland? Are you kidding me?

        No I’m seriously suggesting that among the countries that already developed the more religious ones are far less racist.

        I wonder why you intentionally chose an undeveloped country like Ethiopia.

        Your comparison and view of Ethiopia clearly shows your racism. I know your kind and I know how racist you are.

        You can continue to remain silent in opposition to racism like all your other low-life racist friends. Why won’t atheists ever criticize other atheists for their disgusting racism? It’s specifically because they agree with and support racism, isn’t this true?

        All your arguments were so weak and pathetic, but at least you gave it a try.

      • Sugarcane / Mar 5 2012 4:56 am

        Ok so you skirted around my question about what an atheist country might be, and you just resorted to your usual tack of petty, childish name calling. Well done for showing everyone here that you have a huge lack of understanding of every single topic you cover and that you’re not a particularly nice person, nor capable of an intelligent debate.

        Just one thing tho:

        “How? I linked evolution and the brain being the mind directly to racism and already explained how it’s directly linked to racism. So are you trying to argue that you don’t believe in evolution or that the brain is the mind?”

        No, understanding evolution DOES NOT, HAS NEVER AND NEVER WILL imply racism. You say:

        “The brain being the mind tells us that we can determine intelligence by brain size and brain structure. Evolution tells us that different ethnic groups evolved to have different brain sizes and brain structures.”

        The understanding that races are different IS NOT RACISM. Acknowledging the reasons behind this IS NOT RACISM. Judging a person based on a stereotype of their race is what racism is all about.

        Wow, what you’re suggesting is that be me saying “chinese people are generally shorter than French people” is racist. What an utterly absurd idea of what constitutes racism.

        Furthermore determining intelligence by brain size and brain structure is just a bit silly. IQ tests are the measurement that’s used, not measurements of brain size.

      • Sugarcane / Mar 5 2012 5:11 am

        Also, this is highly objectionable:

        “You can continue to remain silent in opposition to racism like all your other low-life racist friends.”

        – a hate-filled statement with no basis in reality. You’ve never met any of my friends, yet you can somehow know they’re low-life and racist. Does that include my religious friends, too? You complain of ad hominem attacks yet you use them as the basis of your arguments. Intellectually dishonest and incredibly weak.

        “Your comparison and view of Ethiopia clearly shows your racism. I know your kind and I know how racist you are.”

        No. I used Ethiopia as an example for several reasons, none of them racist. Firstly, it has one of the highest percentages of religious belief in the world. Secondly, it has one of the lowest standards of living in the world. Thirdly, it has one of the highest murder rates in the world. I used this as an example to show how your comparison of Sweden and Switzerland is a false argument because it’s completely refuted by the statistics relating to other nation states. Your assumption is that “atheist countries” (STILL waiting for clarification on that bizarre category…) have higher murder rates when you’ll find that the countries with the highest murder rates are religious ones. Statistically this cannot be refuted. And, it blows your “argument” to pieces.

        Furthermore, “I know your kind” is exactly the kind of bigotry you’re claiming to be free from. Such hypocrisy.

    • Davo / Aug 29 2012 2:54 pm

      “How can you believe in evolution and that the physical brain is the mind and not be a racist?”
      Maybe you have a wrong definition of what racist is ? :p . please elaborate what you mean with this.

  71. bleachback / Jan 24 2012 1:40 am

    itsnobody wrote”Why can’t atheists answer the question as to why atheists have remained silent in opposition to racism?”

    what you FAIL to understand Atheism isn’t a sect or a religion. Sure there are Atheist groups out there, that have shows or have conventions and gatherings. i have never been to one, I am just an Atheist, and I have always spoken out against racism. But there are no Atheist Churches where people can raise money to appose racism. And it’s not an Atheist job to police the world to smash racism, that is for everyone to watch out for.

    itsnobody Wrote: (The reason why atheists voice opposition to Intelligent Design and Creationism is because they strongly disagree with those things, so it’s easy to find articles and videos written by atheists opposing those things.”) <— LOL "Intelligent Design and Creationism" <– That's Christians trying to use science to explain the existence god, and they still have no proof.

    • itsnobody / Jan 30 2012 10:36 pm

      How is it relevant if atheism is a religion or not?

      You don’t have to raise money to oppose racism or whatever, lol.

      There never has existed any opposition to racism or racist countries from atheists simply because atheists don’t strongly disagree with racism.

      You still never answered the question as to why atheists voice opposition to Intelligent Design and Creationism, but not to racism. Isn’t it because atheists strongly disagree with those things but do not strongly disagree with racism?

      I’ve also heard atheists oppose discrimination against gays, but for some reason they’ve remained silent in opposition to racism.

      • Davo / Aug 29 2012 2:57 pm

        except all those laws against racism?

  72. bleachback / Jan 24 2012 12:55 am

    I am an Atheist and I will never support racism. The Bible teaches racism, it teaches slavery is ok, the hatred of females, Infanticide and Murder. The list goes on and on. Atheist don’t bomb abortion clinics, or fly planes into buildings, Shoot doctors for working in a family clinic. There are racist people everywhere most are religious that is a fact, since the majority of people do believe in a god and go to Church. Religion is a huge excuse for people’s bigotry. You are the biggest bigot here. You are preaching hatred and intolerance. You need to wash your mouth out with buckshot.

    • itsnobody / Jan 30 2012 10:53 pm

      From the comments and responses from atheists so far we can see that atheists really are subhuman in terms of intelligence.

      It’s the same response I predicted – just changing the subject to claiming that Theists are racists.

      I’ve already acknowledged that there are lots of racists theists.

      Since you have intentionally refused to even acknowledge that 100% of atheist countries are racist or that racist atheists exist I sincerely hope you stop being racist or get killed off by a natural disaster.

      Refusing to criticize racism is part of the problem. All atheists have done instead is celebrate racist/atheist (it’s the same thing) countries.

  73. bleachback / Jan 24 2012 12:39 am

    funny all the crap this so called person blames on Atheist is really what religion does.

    • itsnobody / Jan 30 2012 11:30 pm

      How so (meaning how is it what religion really does)? Oh wait I forgot since atheists are subhumans in terms of intelligence I shouldn’t expect atheists to give any valid reasons for their statements.

  74. Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 7:34 pm

    Say “atheists shouldn’t be considered humans” again. Say it ONE LAST GODDAMN TIME! 90% of my friends are atheists, and all but one of my non-Caucasian friends are atheist, to the best of my knowledge. They are the most caring, understanding, optimistic, happy people I’ve ever met, and if you say that they aren’t human, you deserve to go to hell. No, I don’t believe in it, but I’d gladly start if it meant you’d go there. You are worse than a combination terrorist-rapist-murderer.

    • itsnobody / Jan 31 2012 3:00 am

      I can only consider your non-racist atheist friends as human beings.

      Yeah progressive liberal atheists like James D. Watson and Richard Lynn are so caring they think that blacks are so stupid that they are incapable of functioning without government help.

      Believing that Africans are genetically stupid is a liberal progressive idea.

      According to liberal atheist Richard Lynn sub-Saharan Africans have an average IQ in the 60s. He considers an average IQ of 89 for Kenya (as reported in Daley 2003) as just “too high” for sub-Saharan Africans and therefore unreliable.

      Here’s Richard Lynn talking about “The Dysgenic Effects Of Non White Immigration” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26bQ7CWFe0c (this video was posted by a Swede BTW).

      Here’s Richard Lynn discussing “The Global Bell Curve” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7nxFEwgRvE (this video was posted by TheEpicureanAtheist).

      Nazis/atheists rejoice that Richard Lynn exists!

      People have to realize that this racism problem is directly caused by the atheist population. I know the kind of people that atheists are, they are the worst possible form of life, and you will be amazed at how quickly things will change once atheists take over a country.

      Right now in modern times we know that 100% of atheist countries are racist, by the year 2030 once the atheist population is much higher there should be lots of Nazi/Nationalist/atheist countries.

      • Davo / Aug 29 2012 3:01 pm

        is there any harvard in Kenia? clearly, no intellectual will stay in Kenia. why deny that Kenia will have lower iq? the constatation of differences in iq is a fact, not racism. if you would still like to call it racism, you might as well call it ‘place-ism’, or ‘environment-ism’, since the most crucial factor in iq is the environment.

  75. Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 4:22 pm

    is this a joke?

  76. mel / Jan 23 2012 3:20 pm

    Mormons are christians and they are very racist. They believe that everyone with dark skin is a decendent that bares the mark of Cain and is therefore cursed by god. Also the christians in the United States supported their right to own slaves because of the bible saying that it is ok to own slaves that are not part of your own tribe. Some christians are just extremely racist.

    • MRDA / Jan 23 2012 5:26 pm

      Let’s not forget Christian Identity , either.

      • itsnobody / Jan 31 2012 6:04 am

        Yeah it’s the same boring response that I already predicted in this article – changing the subject to claiming that Theists are racists because you want racist atheists not to receive any criticism at all.

        Who’s forgotten about “Christian Identity”? I mentioned “Christian Identity” in my previous article from months ago.

        Christian Identity is not accepted by any mainstream form of Christianity. No mainstream form of Christianity accepts nationalism at all. The “Christian Identity” people and other Christian Nationalists receive so much criticism from other Christians that they either admit that they do not follow any mainstream form of Christianity or they eventually abandon Christianity all together. The “Christian Identity” people are obviously possessed by evil that’s why they follow the way of the atheist.

        Many (if not most) White Nationalists find Christianity to be incompatible with White Nationalism. They view Christianity as an artificial unnatural perversion, the way of the Jew. The natural inherent nature of the white man is to be racist and preserve their race, but Christianity artificially prevents this according to WNs.

        Reasons why White Nationalists cannot accept Christianity:
        – Non-European religion (originating with ethnic Jews), actual European religions are things like Norse and Celtic religions (like things with Merlin and Thor’s hammer)
        – No connection to old European culture (connected to old Jewish culture)
        – Jewish-based (the Old Testament is a completely Jewish text called the Tanakh)
        – Easy to interpret in ways that are pro-race-mixing
        – Judeo-Christian religions all forbid nationalism (“one blood all nations of men”)
        – Worshiping the Jew as God
        – Encourages supporting Israel
        – Criticism from all the other Christians
        – Too much re-interpreting necessary to make it compatible with White Nationalism

        How can White Nationalism which is about preserving old European culture be compatible with Christianity?

        The less religious (specifically the less Judeo-Christian) and more atheistic people are the better it is for White Nationalists.

        According to ex-Christian White Nationalists when they give up Christianity and start practicing native European religions like Norse and Celtic religions they feel much more European (you know the stuff with goblins, magic, fairies, Merlin, Odin, Thor’s hammer, etc…). When they practice Christianity they feel unnatural and non-European.

        When given the choice between what’s more important your race or your religion, the choice is easy for the atheist/racist, it’s RACE ABOVE ALL.

        If you don’t believe me then just ask another White Nationalist/atheist if what I said is true.

        But I understand these things, and even beyond what I do not understand.

  77. avamarie / Jan 23 2012 2:49 pm

    I’m white, I mean burn-don’t-tan white. My ancestors are mostly Irish, English, and Scottish.

    I’m an atheist.

    I’m not a racist. Not remotely. I find the constant barrage of anti-Islamic rhetoric to be abhorrent, whether it’s coming from atheists or Christians or whatever. My being white does not automatically make me a racist. My being an atheist does not automatically make me racist.

    You paint an entire group as “sub-human” for allegedly viewing another group as “sub-human.” You want to wipe out all atheists because of your terribly misguided ideas. Seems rather hypocritical, actually.

    Your assumption that there is no such thing as a non-racist white atheist is absurd. You go to great lengths to twist every response to justify your initial assertion. It’s pretty sad, honestly. At the same time, your smug moral superiority is rather nauseating.

  78. Gilbert Smith / Jan 23 2012 1:37 pm

    I think you’re right, we SHOULD execute everyone who’s intolerant of the beliefs of other people and everybody who makes broad assumptions about other groups of people. We’ll start with you.

  79. MRDA / Jan 23 2012 1:22 pm

    Are you giving your audience the Final Solution to the Atheist Question?

    If anyone here reading this is an atheist, then I just want you to know that I truthfully don’t consider you or any of your other low-life racists atheists friends as human beings, but instead as subhuman beings.

    In conclusion in order to reduce racism society shouldn’t accept atheists/racists as human beings unless they give up their racism.

    Since atheists refuse to give up their racism and are almost incapable of not being racist I fear that the only solution to this racism problem is if the atheist people as a whole never existed…

    What a great joy it would be if a natural disaster came and just exterminated all atheists/racists, terrorists, murderers, and rapists in the world.

    It sure seems that way: interesting how your psychology mirrors that of the Nazis you profess to hate (that is, if you’re not just trolling).

  80. Rose / Jan 23 2012 12:50 pm

    I’m amazed that people are taking this moron seriously. Really – all of his (or her) “facts” are simply drivel – Canada, which is one of the most highly secular nations in the world, entrenches the right for anyone to honour their own religion in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Religious people of all colours and races flock here from their disgusting religious countries because here they can be free to celebrate their Jewish, Muslim, Wiccan, Satanist, Druse, etc., etc., etc. faiths without interference, and we all manage to get along just fine thank you. And that is just one of the horrible atheist countries that doofus here thinks is so fascist.

    In the US, in contrast, there are whole schools full of so-called “loving Christians” who are two clicks off of full jihad against anyone who disagrees with them. In the land of the free under “god” there is no freedom of religion. Or the freedom to not have any religion. This nobody person is just a boring fool with a free WordPress blog who has no clue how to act like a regular human so has to blame his/her bad luck in life on other people. Disgusting.

    • Davo / Aug 29 2012 3:18 pm

      and if you point to him how non-atheists can be racists and how atheists can be non-racists, then you are ‘off topic’, ‘reverting the question’, while clearly he claims racism=atheism. since double inclusion does not hold, the equivalence does not hold.

  81. George / Jan 23 2012 11:54 am

    You are either a raving lunatic or a troll. Pick one.

    • Bob Sheidler / Jan 23 2012 1:24 pm

      >>You are either a raving lunatic or a troll. Pick one.<<

      Not that those two are at all mutually exclusive! I vote for the author being both!

  82. Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 9:39 am

    I’m lost for words. The idiocy of your article is beyond anything I’ve ever come across.

    I will try and help a little – but until you actually learn to reason, it won’t do much good.

    First, there is no scientific reason to believe that Asians, or Africans, or whatever race you choose, is less intelligent than any other. There may be differences in brain mass, but we use science specifically to avoid jumping to ridiculous conclusions. We don’t fully understand the mind. We don’t fully understand intelligence. A good memory is taken by most of society today as an indication of intelligence – but the kids of tomorrow might just consider that a waste of grey matter. Different parts of the brain may have a different distribution of mass across the races and cause slightly different emphasis on different abilities – but we won’t know that until the studies have been done. Just because two things are different, does not mean one is better than the other.

    Evolution explains many things – and is a scientific theory because it can potentially be refuted (as opposed to ‘God did it!’, which cannot be tested). Mathematical models of neurons explain some of what our brain does – like association and pattern recognition.

    So that is how I can believe in evolution, and believe that the mind exists in the brain, and not be racist. Simple logic.

    Selfishness is fundamentally irrational when we understand that we are a very small part of a very large system. Science does not accept ‘God did it’ as an explanation, but it says nothing about the plausibility of a belief in God other than that it is outside the realm of science. Atheism takes this further, and says that there is a certain meaninglessness in beliefs that can’t be tested, and a dangerous tendency for them to be or become disconnected from reality (as your article clearly demonstrates). Atheism is an attempt to live rationally, not giving in to the temptation to believe in some omnipresent loving being that will magically make everything ok. Hence, logically, true atheism actually causes people to be more moral. Not to mention how it causes one to truly value this very brief time we have (as opposed to worrying about our ‘riches in heaven’).

    That is why I am not moral _in spite_ of my atheism. Have you ever heard of an atheist suicide bomber?

    You, sir, are being racist when you tell the ‘Jewish’ lady above, ‘oh, I didn’t mean I wanted to exterminate _you_, ’cause you’re not what I call white’.

    I have seen the Muslim ‘religious police’ beat Filipino workers with camel sticks for not going to pray at prayer time. I’ve lived in Arabia, Asia, the US, Europe, Australia, etc. These places you call ‘atheist countries’ are not more racist, simple as that.

  83. Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 9:02 am

    This has got to be the longest string of hyper right wing Religious fanatic bullshit I’ve seen this year.Congratulations.

  84. Henry Norman / Jan 23 2012 8:54 am

    Filed under “Philosophy, Politics, Thoughts”… That’s really funny! On all three counts!

  85. itsnobody / Jan 21 2012 6:49 pm

    Since atheists refuse to give up their racism and are almost incapable of not being racist I fear that the only solution to this racism problem is if the atheist people as a whole never existed, but most likely that will never happen so the only thing I can do personally is criticize atheists for their racism hoping that they give up their disgusting ways.

    If atheists will not give up their racism then what other option is there?

    Because of the disgusting nature of atheists, since constant criticism just isn’t getting atheists to stop being racist I wonder what step I should take next to end racism. Probably the next step should be to get non-atheists to not consider atheists as human beings.

    What a great joy it would be if a natural disaster came and just exterminated all atheists/racists, terrorists, murderers, and rapists in the world.

    I really wish atheists would give up racism but it seems like that will never happen since atheists intentionally refuse to criticize racism in general, racist atheists, or racist atheist countries.

    So far all the responses from atheists have simply been to become angry that I’m criticizing racist atheists.

    So what is the reason, what is the cause of atheists refusing to criticize racism in general, racist atheists, or racist atheist countries?

    When an atheist sees another atheist supporting Intelligent Design they think in their mind “I strongly disagree so I have to voice some kind of opposition. I’m going to write some articles and make some videos opposing Intelligent Design”

    When an atheist sees another atheist supporting racism they think in their mind “I don’t really disagree, so why should I say anything?”

    Similarly atheists think:
    “Since I agree with and support racism I’m going to continue to celebrate James D. Watson”
    “Since I agree with and support racism I’m going to continue to celebrate racist/atheist countries”
    “Since I agree with and support racism I’m going to continue to use Richard Lynn as a source”
    “Since I agree with and support racism I’m going to continue to remain silent in opposition to racism”

    Isn’t it all true?

  86. SpSG / Jan 16 2012 1:15 pm

    Would you indulge my curiosity, and explain why belief in evolution is racist?

    -Is it because it has scientific basis?
    -Is it because it does not align with Creationism’s Theory ?

    Are you aware of what the theory of evolution actually is, or do you just not like the concept because it contradicts your religious views?

    If the contradiction bothers you then you are most likely discriminatory towards nearly all religions which aren’t the same as yours. Since nearly all religions contradict each other.. one faith will state that if God is not properly praised ( In the manner that the specific religion dictates) then the person that did not properly praise “him” will go to “hell”. So in practice, this concept would entitle that all people in the world would go to hell. “heaven” and “hell” are not even present in all religions, and the concept of a male god is not present in all religions either. The concept of one god “Monotheism” is apposed by “Polytheism” in this manner no one can agree upon a concept that is praised. Who is to be punished, and for what reason? Are murderers demons in disguise, or simply gods creations that just so happened to diverge mentally in comparison to the rest of society because of their surroundings, up bringing, and birth. How can they be judged? By God, by anyone?

    So are you Discriminating against religions? Science? or are you just anti athiest?

    In the past they would judge individuals using “God” this was known as Trial by God/Ordeal.

    Criminals would get away, and innocent people would be killed- not that the innocent were considered innocent, since “God” wouldnt get an answer wrong. Only till much later was “God” removed from trial. After countless people died of infection, drowning, and fire supposedly being judged guilty by God. God being a game of chance back then.

    If you float your innocent, If you drown your guilty? how many correct convictions do you think were yielded using this method.

    • itsnobody / Jan 21 2012 6:17 pm

      Wow your arguments are just straw man arguments.

      The people claiming that evolution supports scientific racism are progressive liberal atheists like James D. Watson and Richard Lynn.

      There are two main beliefs that support scientific racism:
      – Evolution
      – The physical brain is the mind

      How so?

      The physical brain is the mind: Tells us that intelligence can be determined by physical brain size, brain structure, and other physical aspects of the brain.

      Evolution: Tells us that different ethnic groups evolved with different facial features, brain sizes, brain structures, etc…

      The belief that the physical brain is the mind is also connected to an afterlife, abortion, free-will, and many other things.

      It’s just as liberal atheist James D. Watson said:
      “There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so” – Liberal atheist biologist, James D. Watson, DNA co-discoverer

      Once society as a whole accepts what liberal atheists like Richard Lynn and James D. Watson believe as scientific fact rather than mere speculation it will be extraordinarily easy to justify Nazi/nationalists laws. I predict this should happen around the year 2030 or so.

      The conclusion that evolution and the belief that the brain is the mind directly support scientific racism has nothing to do with not aligning with creationism or religious views as your straw man arguments claim.

      I’ve found that I understand evolution much much better than basically all atheists. They don’t really seem to get what it is. But then again I understand most things better than all people in general.

      What’s could be more liberal or progressive than believing that Martin Luther King Jr. was a dumb delusional creationist reverend, believing in evolution, and believing the brain is the mind?

      “The liberal is more deceitful than the conservative. The liberal is more hypocritical than the conservative” – Malcolm X

      As for your argument that different religions contradict each other, so what? It’s just like someone saying different hypotheses contradict each other…so what? I don’t see the significance in pointing that out.

      As for my beliefs, I just try to observe what is actually true with my mind. I encourage science because I know that science shall end up exterminating most forms of atheism, with impersonalism leftover as the atheist’s last resort.

      • Matteo / Jan 23 2012 4:53 pm

        I quote: “Evolution: Tells us that different ethnic groups evolved with different facial features, brain sizes, brain structures, etc…”

        How else do you think these ethnic groups came to exist? even if the bible was right (which is not) god only made Adam and Eve. Now, even christians who deny macro evolution cannot deny micro-evolution (which by the way, can be even more easily) and agree that’s how other races have developed.

        Or, I could simply tell you that I am an atheist, and I am NOT racist, therefore shitting all over your pointless article.

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 3 2012 9:32 pm

        Of course I believe that the mind is a product of the physical brain, but brain size does not necessarily correspond with intelligence. If brain size was an indicator of intelligence, Lebron James would be far more intelligent than Einstein, and a whale would be hundreds of times intelligent as either. It’s all about quality, not quantity. Also, because two atheists you have found are racist, you think the other 910,000,000 must be, too.

  87. SpSG / Jan 16 2012 12:52 pm

    “No one really knows why atheists are such hateful, racist, evil people, the worst of all human beings. If atheists aren’t going to oppose racism, then it’s up to Theists to do it”.- This is the most ignorant statement I have ever had the bittersweet pleasure to read. Im not sure if your article actually expresses any of your opinions, but if it does then what I found to be humorous is actually just quite pathetic. I am not an atheist but I do not believe in any religion, I enjoy the values of most religions but nothing beyond that. I do not know how you would classify me as I have no belief in God but no disbelief that a concept such as God, or Allah, or Waheguru can exist. I do not fall under any known classifications of faith, or people. You may classify me as an atheist but I am no racist, I have formed multiple anti racist-racism awareness groups, and often protest racism. I myself am of mixed genetics and after reading your article it seems your views are just as extreme , if not more extreme than a racists. I find your reference to people as subhumans very distressing, but I will respect your choice to voice your opinion. I know many atheists, and agnostics and none of them are racist, you are stereotyping, and generalizing just as racists did, and continue to do. Thoughts like the ones you are expressing are what kept Slavery going, and racism alive. Please consider that every human mind reacts to what input it is given, everyone is different in one way or another, even if it is a slight discrepancy in their personality. To say any group of people are a certain thing is incredibly retrogressive. Thank you for the laugh, and the realization that human beings are intolerant like yourself. I mistakenly thought things were getting better, this article opened my eyes, if its not racism there will always be another kind of discrimination.

    • itsnobody / Jan 21 2012 6:01 pm

      I don’t understand the problem you have with my statements since you claim not to be an atheist and to be of mixed genetics, are you non-white?

      People have to realize that the reason why white atheists have remained silent in opposition to racism is specifically because they strongly agree with and support racism. Their strategy is to remain silent in opposition, not receive any criticism from the liberal atheist media, and slowly turn a country into a nationalist/Nazi country.

      How are thoughts like mine what kept racism alive? It is only through constant criticism that racism was reduced.

      It is thoughts like yours of wanting people to not speak out against racism that has always kept racism alive.

      Why should I consider racists, murderers, terrorists, or rapists as human beings or be tolerant of them?

      When I see an atheist/racist I just think of them as like a dog, or a cat, or a cockroach. But now that I think about it a cockroach is actually a higher form of life than an atheist.

      You didn’t refute anything that I said.

      Isn’t it all true that:
      – 100% of atheist countries are extremely racist
      – Atheists refuse to voice any opposition to racism in general, racist atheist countries, or racist atheists
      – Atheists continue to celebrate James D. Watson
      – Atheists continue to celebrate racist/atheist countries
      – Atheists continue to cite Richard Lynn as a viable source

      Everything I said is all true.

      You’ll be amazed at how quickly things change once atheists take over a country. Nearly overnight things will become nationalistic and Nazi-like.

      You just sound like another delusional non-white atheist who wants to fit in with white atheists, deluding themselves into thinking that white atheists are non-racists.

      A non-racist white atheist? April Fools!

  88. itsnobody / Jan 7 2012 3:43 pm

    These comments here from atheists only re-confirm why I consider atheists as subhuman beings rather than as human beings.

    We can see from the subhuman responses that arise from the subhuman atheist mind that:
    – Atheists do not oppose racism
    – Atheists oppose people criticizing racists atheists and racist atheist countries
    – Atheists value IQ very highly
    – Atheists do not use reasoning but instead ad hominems and logical fallacies
    – Atheists have failed to explain how you can believe in evolution and the brain is the mind without being a racist
    – Atheists do not voice any opposition to racism, racist atheists, or racist atheist countries

    Why should I consider atheists as human beings for? They are gullible, lack the ability to question, and are basically subhumans to society.

    What a shame that there’s only a little bit of time before subhuman atheists take over and ruin society.

  89. itseverybody / Jan 7 2012 4:20 am

    Okay, let’s do some real thinking here..

    In the past, the West colonised other countries and racism was born.. Westerners returned to their home country with the spoils of war, and built great economies.. Note, their countries were populated by their own race at this time..

    Other countries then saw the success of the Western countries and moved there for a “better life”.. They were met with opposition, but, due to “colonial guilt”, the government allows them in and offers protection as best they can.. “Colonial guilt” was born of the understanding that the other races were, actually, human beings too, not animals as was once thought..

    More and more “others” move in, gathering rights to bring their own culture with them, slowly eroding the Western culture.. Opposition increases..

    AND SO ON..

    Do you not see that the reason why the Western cultures are trying so hard to NOT be racist is due to colonial guilt, but they’ve reached a point where the vengeance of the other cultures is degrading their own culture in their own country? They’ve reached a point now where they feel they’ve assuaged their guilt enough, and fear that to keep being “tolerant” would mean losing their own culture?

    As for your correlation of Atheism and Racism, actually it’s the opposite..

    Atheism is generally correlated with a high IQ, which also allows objectivity and the ability to see injustice, both in the past, present and future.. So, in this case, the ability to see the wrongs in the treatment of the colonised countries, the subsequent colonial guilt and the tolerance shown in the present day..

    Religion is generally correlated with a low IQ, which also leads to subjectivity and the inability to see injustice, seeing everything through the filter of their own personal gain.. Such as moving to another country and expecting them to bend over backwards to make you feel welcome when you kill their citizens for not following your faith or being from your race..

    I feel this topic is so obvious it doesn’t warrant a response, but after reading an increasing number of articles in a similar vein to this one, I’ve decided to spend some time explaining the obvious to those unable to figure it out for themselves..

    • itsnobody / Jan 7 2012 2:32 pm

      Once again more joke arguments from subhuman atheists.

      Are you a White Nationalist? Because your arguments resemble White Nationalist arguments.

      You haven’t refuted any statement I made, you simply agreed with me and used the same IQ reasoning that liberal atheists like James D. Watson and Richard Lynn use to declare that certain ethnic groups are genetically less intelligent.

      So do you believe that certain ethnic groups are genetically less intelligent (which by definition makes you a racist)?

      My IQ is above 150 but I don’t really care that much about IQ, why do you atheists value IQ so highly for?

      How did you conclude that high IQ leads to less racism? It’s possible that someone can have compassion and a low IQ, and it’s possible that someone can lack compassion and have a high IQ. IQ just measures how well you can answer IQ-style questions, not how moral you are, or how racist you are.

      Just more substance-less weak arguments from low-life atheists.

      You also seem to be using the same typical White Nationalist argument that “we’re just trying to preserve our race and culture”.

      Who’s eroding Western culture and what’s preventing you low-life atheists\nationalists from preserving your culture?

      I’ve never understood that argument, what does killing others and beating Jews have to do with preserving your culture? Why can’t someone be a non-racist non-nationalist and still preserve their culture?

      Well at least you can agree to a certain extent that you’re a racist since you value IQ highly like all atheists/racists do.

      • Matteo / Jan 23 2012 4:58 pm

        You keep asking and making wild assumptions about other peoples ethnicity based on what they said (and vice-versa). I’m pretty sure you are the only racist here.

      • Davo / Aug 29 2012 1:42 pm

        if you don’t value IQ, why are people who consider another race to be less intelligent to be racist? Ok, then atheists value IQ is your answer. Still, can one have beliefs that are not positive about ‘the average person of some race’ and not be racist? Sure. I for one, see no reason why I can’t agree that jews and asians are the superior races in terms of AVERAGE intelligence. So, why can’t I say something negative. I think there are plenty of studies showing that jews and asians have higher IQs, and one can also look at the number of prominent Jewish scientists.I’m not a jew, nor an asian.

  90. Mark / Jan 5 2012 9:48 pm

    “The survey, conducted annually by UMR Insight Ltd since 2000, showed that 77 per cent of New Zealanders consider that Asians are discriminated against more than any other group. This figure is up from 75 per cent in 2009 and 74 per cent in 2008″ – http://www.hrc.co.nz/2011/asians-still-the-most-discriminated-against

    You know how surveys work right? That means that 77% of people think asians are discriminated against, not that 77% of them actually take part in the discrimination. How old are you?

    As for Sweden you have one quote where a man was called a damn jew? Really thats it? Thats all you’re coming with.
    I can post literally thousands of instances of racism in the united states which is as we know is thought of as very Christian. Are they all racist?

    Honestly though this isn’t even worth the time. I have better things to do than sit here and correct the prattlings of some 17 year old.
    Also as one small parting gift to you, Xenophobia and racism are not the same thing. You’d be wise to learn the difference.

    • itsnobody / Jan 7 2012 2:21 pm

      Thanks for the laugh.

      Sorry for your delusions, but many other studies have been done on the racism in New Zealand and Sweden (all indicating that New Zealand and Sweden are very racist countries), I can point them out if you want me to.

      It’s true that surveys aren’t the best indicator, but still if 77% in New Zealand believe that Asians are discriminated against how could you claim that New Zealand isn’t racist? All of the other studies done have also indicated that NZ is racist.

      I can point out the studies if you want me to.

      I’m sure you could find racist events in US since the US has a population size of nearly 313 million. Sweden has a population size of less 9.5 million and New Zealand has a population size of less than 4.5 million. The higher population size the higher the possibility of racist events occurring.

      It’s the same arguments from low-life atheists:
      – Change the subject to claiming that Theists are racists
      – Deny that atheist countries are racist
      – Not consider anything to be evidence that atheist countries are racist

      What a laughable argument from atheists “The reason atheist countries aren’t racist is because nothing can be considered as evidence that atheist countries are racist, but anything can be considered as evidence that the US or any religious country is racist” what a joke lol.

      Thanks for the laugh again.

      BTW I’m not a 17-year-old but it would be irrelevant even if I was (you can’t refute a statement by pointing out someone’s age), but the subhuman atheist mind probably would not understand this.

      • Matteo / Jan 23 2012 5:06 pm

        You also keep pointing out fallacies but are committing a pretty big one your self by claiming that since New Zeland is an atheist country, and 77% of people there think that Asians are being discriminated against, therefore all Atheists are racist> that’s called a false correlation. Argentina is a ridiculously religious country (as most South American countries) and there’s crazy racism rates going on over there but obviously you won’t bring that up because it won’t favor your silly argument.

      • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 5:10 am

        Which fallacy did I use shithead?

        I never claimed all atheists were racists because NZ was racist stupid, I used NZ as an example of another racist/atheist country. There’s not even one atheist country in the entire world that isn’t extraordinarily racist.

        Argentina is just one country, where as 100% of atheist countries are racist. Argentina is also not celebrated as great religious country like how Sweden, Denmark, and the other low-life atheist/racist countries are.

        Your argument also doesn’t establish causation, where as I’ve already proven that believing in evolution and the brain is the mind causes one to favor nationalism. Just see Richard Lynn’s argument.

        If Argentina really is racist then I will heavily criticize them and never dare celebrate them.

        BTW how did you conclude that Argentina was racist? Oh wait I know “Since Argentina is more religious I consider anything to be evidence that Argentina is a racist country, like a rumor, but since New Zealand is less religious I don’t consider anything to be evidence that they are racist”

  91. Samara Veler / Jan 5 2012 6:38 am

    You said, “Is there a such thing as a white non-racist atheist? If there are then why don’t they ever speak out and voice any opposition to racism…”?

    Well this is me speaking out. I have been active in my schools against racism and I have promoted inclusivity regardless of race/gender/orientation/religion/family/everything else. I have friends who come from many varied backgrounds and nobody except for you, someone who has never met me, has ever said anything so rude and outlandish to me. Now why is that? I don’t think the problem is with me.

    • itsnobody / Jan 5 2012 4:59 pm

      Since you are part Jewish Nationalists/atheists don’t even consider you as white.

      They have defined White as non-Jewish European.

      You’ve still failed to explain how you can believe in evolution and that the physical brain is the mind and not be a racist…but I guess that’s expected since atheists are basically incapable of using reasoning…all they have are ad hominems and claiming that they are non-racist

  92. Samara Veler / Jan 5 2012 6:31 am

    I am a caucasian atheist and I am not a racist. Last time I checked, I am also a human being. I am currently studying both French and Arabic, and I speak fluent English. I plan on learning several more languages and I want to be an interpreter.

    Racism is wrong, and I don’t need to believe in a magical or omnipotent being that supposedly created the world to realize that murder, rape, genocide, and discrimination (to name a few) are horrible things!

    I don’t hate anyone based on their race, gender, sexual orientation, family, or faith. I hate people who promote senseless discrimination (such as the author of this article, against atheists).

    The argument that atheists have no morals is dangerously misinformed. You can’t generalize “atheists” any more than you can generalize “Christians.” It would be misinformed of me to state that “because some Christians commit murder in the name of their God, all Christians are murderers,” just like it would be misinformed to group all atheists into a clump and say “because one doesn’t like ____, none of them do.”

    I come from a very diverse family. My mother is Catholic, my father is an atheist (verging on agnostic), my grandfather is Jewish, and I have extended family who are Asian, not that “Asian” is a religion. I don’t hate any of them and I don’t plan on starting now. I have the same morals as any other decent person.

    There are more things than I can list that I know are wrong, including racism and violence. I don’t need an imaginary sky-being to tell me what’s right or wrong. I know that I shouldn’t (and never will) steal, murder, or senselessly hate because I am a human being who is capable of rational thought. Apparently this is more than can be said for some people.

    I am deeply, deeply offended by this article.
    Who are you to say I am “the worst person you will ever find”?! You don’t know me. You don’t know anything about me except for what I’ve just told you. I don’t know the kind of people you associate with, but if they’re as bad as you say then maybe you should find some new friends.

    I would be happy to answer any questions anyone may have about my particular beliefs, but I cannot speak for all atheists because that’s not how it works. Anyone who says differently may want to re-evaluate their own sense of morality.

    Samara,
    simsamara@aol.com

    • itsnobody / Jan 5 2012 5:30 pm

      More weak arguments from atheists….

      It’s time for me to entirely ruin your arguments just like how I ruined every other atheist’s arguments.

      1. Since you are part Jewish White Nationalists do not consider you as white, only non-Jewish Europeans are white to them.

      2. You just used straw man arguments…I never claimed that atheists were incapable of morals…atheists can have morals despite their atheistic beliefs, not because of their atheistic beliefs

      3. Racism doesn’t only mean hating other races

      4. You used another straw man…God has never been defined as an invisible sky- being as atheists foolishly believe, it’s just another lie thought up by atheists

      5. I said I only consider non-racists atheists as human beings (rather than as subhuman beings)

      6. You’ve failed to explain how you can believe in evolution and that the physical brain is the mind without being racist

      7. You’ve failed to explain why there is not even one white atheist country in the entire world that is not extremely racist

      8. I don’t really care how much people are offended…since racists atheists receive zero criticism from other atheists someone has speak up

      As long as atheists exist racism will forever be strong and alive. By the year 2030 most of the world should’ve accepted evolution and liberal atheist Richard Lynn’s book as truth.

      You will see how quickly countries will change and become racist once atheists take them over.

      Why should I consider these terrible people called “atheists” as human beings instead of as subhuman beings?

  93. itsnobody / Jan 4 2012 2:56 am

    Why should I consider these terrible people called atheists as human beings?

    Just look at the comments here, there is not one opposing racism. Atheists do not oppose racism they oppose anyone who criticize atheists (for racism or anything else).

    Instead of voicing opposition to racism like how they voice opposition to Creationism and Intelligent Design atheists instead have taken certain actions to show their support of racism:
    – Continue to celebrate liberal atheist James D. Watson
    – Celebrate racists/atheists countries
    – Use Richard Lynn as a source for claiming that atheists are smarter
    – Remain silent in opposition to racism, racist atheist countries, and other racist atheists

    When atheists think of Intelligent Design and Creationism they think “I strongly disagree so I have to write articles and make videos opposing these things”

    When atheists think of racism they think “I don’t really disagree…so why would I ever voice any opposition?”

    I don’t really know how anyone can live being as low as a low-life atheist/racist, they are lowest form of life, the worst of all human beings, the most disgusting people that exist.

    People have to realize that this is an atheist-only problem before it’s too late and atheists take over the world and turn it into a racist hell.

    Atheists aren’t voicing any opposition so it’s only up to Theists to attempt to end racism.

  94. James Probis / Jan 3 2012 12:45 am

    Considering others less than human is the essence of bigotry.

    • itsnobody / Jan 4 2012 1:52 am

      Why would I care about bigotry or intolerance towards low-life racists?

      Maybe we should start tolerating murderers, rapists, and terrorists as well

  95. Robert Ford / Jan 3 2012 12:43 am

    This is the most stunningly ignorant thing I’ve ever read on the Internet this week. Kudos to you sir.

    • itsnobody / Jan 4 2012 1:56 am

      Well then, by what reasoning have you concluded that it is “stunningly ignorant”?

      Oh wait atheists don’t use reasoning, they use ad hominems and other logical fallacies.

      Can any atheist name a non-racist atheist country? There is no such thing, lol!

      • Cole m. / Feb 6 2012 11:06 pm

        Ok you seem to be very confident that 100% of all atheists are racist. can you provide any study or survey to back that or can you admit that you are just pulling stats out of your asshole.
        Also please provide a single (non satirical) webpage, document etc. about an atheist who wants to kill all religious people and considers them to be subhuman. Oh also provide something to support that i am subhuman to you.

  96. chelsarrr / Dec 30 2011 12:36 am

    Every other population you mentioned in this post was a “race”. Then, you mentioned Muslims as the only religious group. Strange that you would identify people this way.

    Race does not exist. There are physical differences that people have, but there are not set lines for race. Examples: “mixed”, “unknown”, physical characteristics differing from parents…there’s really no scientific way to measure racial differences, therefore, it is silly for anyone to use race as a reason to dislike another person.

    As far as your view on atheists: “They aren’t even human.” You sound as hateful as any racist. Way to go. You’re really making the world a better place. If you’re supposed to an example of human acceptance and perfection, then I will gladly hand over my humanity.

    • itsnobody / Dec 31 2011 2:06 am

      I mentioned Muslims because atheists always use Muslims as the easiest target. Anyone who knows an atheist knows how much they hate Muslims.

      As for race not existing why not tell your liberal atheists friends like Richard Lynn and James D. Watson that, lol?

      The exact same liberal atheist who claims that atheists have higher IQs (and who atheists use as a credible source for claiming that atheists are smarter and superior), Richard Lynn, is the exact same liberal atheist who wrote the book “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis”…lol

      All that matters to an atheist is race and IQ, that’s why the only people who value IQ highly are atheists or racists (it’s the same thing).

      It’s the same response from low-life atheists. They will never ever acknowledge that racist atheists even exist and never ever dare oppose racism in general or racist atheists.

      I don’t care about how hateful I sound. Atheists will never oppose racism so it’s my duty to criticize their low-life behavior. Atheists are simply the lowest possible form of life, I don’t know how anyone can drop any lower.

      I know you will never criticize racism in general, racist atheist countries, or racist atheists because that’s the type of people that atheists are.

      • chelsarrr / Jan 3 2012 2:12 pm

        IQ is also highly unreliable as a way to determine intelligence. It is culturally bias and only measures cognitive ability, leaving other attributes (musical genius, for example) unmeasured.

        I certainly don’t care about IQ tests and prefer, like the warrioress, to use a case-by-case approach.

      • itsnobody / Jan 4 2012 1:59 am

        If IQ is not reliable then how do atheists claim that they are smarter and superior based off IQ testing? lol.

        If atheists don’t care about IQ then why do they always bring it up all the time for?

      • chelsarrr / Jan 3 2012 2:20 pm

        Watson resigned after his ignorant comment and Lynn’s work is highly controversial. I don’t support either of their views on race. All atheist are not “friends”. I’m sure i could find some Christians that are racist, but that serves no point. Your argument is completely invalid.

      • itsnobody / Jan 4 2012 2:11 am

        Must be a delusional. James D. Watson said himself said he was not quoted out of context. Watson simply said he didn’t mean to call anyone inferior. But there’s virtually no difference in saying someone is “less intelligent” versus “inferior in terms of intelligence”, it’s just semantics. James D. Watson most likely still believes in what he said.

        There really are Christian racists and they get lots of criticism from other Theists.

        On the other hand racists atheists do not receive any criticism from other atheists simply because atheists strongly agree with and support racism.

        Atheists aren’t going to voice any opposition to racism like how they voice opposition to Intelligent Design or Creationism.

        The reason why atheists voice opposition to Intelligent Design and Creationism is because they strongly disagree with those things, so it’s easy to find articles and videos written by atheists opposing those things.

        The reason why atheists intentionally refuse to voice any opposition to racism in general or racist atheists is because they either agree with and support racism or do not disagree strongly enough with racism to voice any opposition. Where are all the articles and videos by atheists opposing racism?

        Why can’t atheists answer the question as to why atheists have remained silent in opposition to racism?

  97. the warrioress / Dec 28 2011 5:32 pm

    I prefer not to stereotype if at all possible, and thus take atheists, like other groups, on a case by case basis. I suggest you do the same, but understand how one bad apple can spoil the whole bunch for ya.. just keep working on it. 😉

    • itsnobody / Dec 29 2011 3:32 pm

      What do you mean? There is no such thing as a non-racist atheist country because there is no such thing as a non-racist white atheist

      The reason why atheists have intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism is specifically because they agree with and support racism.

      Instead of openly saying “I agree with and support racism” they instead just remain silent in opposition to racism to let everyone know where they stand.

      • Mark / Jan 5 2012 9:59 pm

        LIke the Christians that did nothing during apartheid and the Civil Rights movements?

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 1 2012 7:52 pm

        Do you have any evidence to support your claims? And let’s not forget that Hitler, Himmler, Goering, Goebbels and Hess were all Christians.

      • Dustin Braden / Aug 1 2012 7:53 pm

        Sorry, Mark, I’m replying to Itsnobody, not you.

      • Davo / Aug 29 2012 1:47 pm

        quite striking that you think ‘all atheists are racists’. It kind of makes you look like the same a racist does: generalize into stereotypes and conclude that every atheist is a racist. even if atheists were more likely to be racist, it is a mistake to say that all atheists are racists.

  98. chelsarrr / Dec 28 2011 11:21 am

    “Muslim” is not a race. You should be aware that people who are Muslim follow the religion of Islam and are not necessarily of a specific racial background. That would be racist.

    • itsnobody / Dec 29 2011 3:28 pm

      When did I claim that Muslim is a race?

      I’m also not talking about discrimination against Muslims.

      Of course the discrimination in atheist countries is against Arab-looking people regardless of if they are Muslim or not (and also Jews, Africans, Asians, etc…)

  99. itsnobody / Sep 4 2014 4:02 am

    Oh no, you got me all wrong.

    I don’t think atheists should be killed (unless they commit suicide themselves), I think they should be viewed as subhuman beings.

  100. Georgia / Jun 9 2016 3:47 am

    Let me guess, you believe that LGBT individuals should be viewed as inferior as well? (This is coming from a straight person) Wouldn’t be surprised if you did. It sounds like you’re referring to Athesists as animals – how pathetic.

Trackbacks

  1. Antis should racists be killed? - Stormfront
  2. Movement to get society to view atheists as subhuman beings rather than as actual human beings | itsnobody
  3. Another nobody « Cubik's Rube

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: