Skip to content
August 1, 2011 / itsnobody

Why are atheists so racist?

All of the atheists I’ve known are racists. I thought I knew this one non-white atheist who wasn’t a racist but it turned out that she wasn’t actually an atheist. I guess only some non-white atheists aren’t racist. I try to get atheists to stop being racist, but they won’t listen to me. Atheists are just terrible people, not on average, but as a whole.

Famous liberal atheists like Richard Dawkins, James D. Watson, and Richard Lynn have all voiced their support of scientific racism:

It is an article of passionate faith among “politically correct” biologists and anthropologists that brain size has no connection with intelligence; that intelligence has nothing to do with genes; and that genes are probably nasty fascist things anyway

Richard Dawkins, the leader of the foolish and disgusting, from The Evolutionary Future of Man (1993)

Richard Lynn, the exact same liberal atheist who claims that atheists have higher IQs (and who atheists use as a source for claiming that atheists are superior) has said:

The position of environmentalists that over the course of some 100,000 years peoples separated by geographical barriers in different parts of the world evolved into ten different races with pronounced genetic differences in morphology, blood groups, and the incidence of genetic diseases, and yet have identical genotypes for intelligence, is so improbable that those who advance it must either be totally ignorant of the basic principles of evolutionary biology or else have a political agenda to deny the importance of race

Liberal atheist, Richard Lynn, 2006, Prophet of atheist IQ, author of “IQ and the Wealth of Nations”, “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis”

NOTE: Richard Lynn’s claim that the less religious are more intelligent has been thoroughly debunked by me here; Richard Lynn merely used the trick of comparing IQs of the religious vs. non-religious in different ethnic groups, there’s no correlation between IQ and religiosity within the same ethnic group and White atheists rank 12th in household income when compared to other Whites suggesting that within the same ethnic group the more religious are more intelligent.

The most celebrated liberal atheist biologist of all time (who atheists still celebrate today even after knowing of his racist remarks), James D. Watson has said:

There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so

Liberal atheist biologist, James D. Watson, DNA co-discoverer, October 2007

Richard Dawkins (the leader of the foolish and disgusting) supported and defended liberal atheist biologist James D. Watson numerous times further solidifying his support of scientific racism.

I saw this atheist group at the University I attend, everyone there was white, the place was like a white supremacy organization. Liberal white atheists have whites-only friends, listen to whites-only music, watch whites-only TV shows, and hang out with whites-only. They must want it to become like a whites-only type of society.

Everybody knows that basically 100% of atheists are racists (atheists especially know). The preservation of the race is the utmost goal for the atheist or racist (it’s the same thing).

Racists atheists are split into two categories:

– Those that pretend not to be racist
– Those that do not pretend not to be racist

Those that pretend not to be racist maybe be harder to spot, since they are more subtle in their racism, similar to James D. Watson.

In public they’ll say something like this:
“Racism is terrible, it’s a terrible thing, it’s terrible. I’m anti-racist and I think racism is terrible, it’s terrible, just a terrible thing, terrible”

Then in private they transform into James D. Watson:
“inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa because all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really” – Liberal atheist, James D. Watson, October 2007

In public they’ll say something like:
“I view everyone as equal, everyone is equal in my eyes, I don’t care about anyone’s race, it just doesn’t matter to me, it just doesn’t matter, doesn’t matter, it just doesn’t matter at all”

And then in private they transform again:
“there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but people who have to deal with black employees find this not true” – Liberal atheist, James D. Watson, October 2007

Other than all the atheists I know and famous atheists voicing their support of scientific racism, one of the most famous and prominent of all White Nationalists Tom Metzger, is an atheist. Tom Metzger founded WAR (White Aryan Resistance). Tom Metzger was initially a minister but became an atheist primarily because of the conflicts between White Nationalism and religion.

Whenever forced to decide what’s more important: religion or race? The racist will always choose race above all. So many ex-Christians and ex-Theists who are racist will gladly become atheists or give up their religion for the preservation of their race.

Initially, because of the liberal atheist media I thought most White Nationalists were probably right-wing Christian Southerners, but upon investigating things I found the exact opposite to be true. The majority of White Nationalists are non-Christian, Pagan, atheist, or agnostic, and only very few White Nationalists follow Christianity. Outside of the US, Canada, Ukraine, and some Eastern European countries it’s very rare to find a Christian WN, and of those who follow Christianity the majority follow something called “Christian Identity” which has 50,000 or less members and is not accepted by any mainstream form of Christianity. Many White Nationalist even in the deep South are non-Christian. It seems that even if within the most religious countries around half of the White Nationalists within those countries are non-Christian.

Atheists have remained completely silent on the issue of racism. When atheists talk about morals they seem to intentionally leave out discussing racism. I’ve heard atheists speak out against lots of things but racism is not one of those things. I’ve heard lots of other Theist groups speak out against racism and condemn racism, but I’ve never heard even one atheist speak out against racism. Where are all the videos on YouTube of atheists condemning racism or even mentioning or acknowledging that racist atheists exist? It’s easy to find theists speaking out against racism, but extraordinarily difficult to find any atheist condemning racism. I can only find atheists criticizing and accusing Theists of being racist but I cannot find atheists criticizing racism in general or criticizing other atheists for being racist.

So why have atheists remained silent on the issue of racism?

There are only two possible explanations for atheists remaining silent on the issue of racism:
– Atheists don’t disagree strongly enough with racism to say anything
– Atheists agree with and support racism

When people strongly disagree with something they speak up and say something, but atheists have remained completely silent in opposition to racism. Just utterly silent.

Take for instance something like Intelligent Design. Since atheists strongly disagree with Intelligent Design it’s easy to find lots of videos and articles by atheists opposing it and speaking out against it. Now look at the topic of racism, if atheists strongly disagree with racism where are all videos and articles by atheists opposing it? The simple fact is atheists don’t disagree with racism strongly enough to say anything.

I’ve noticed that the most racist countries are also the countries with high atheist populations like:
– Sweden
– New Zealand
– Norway
– Denmark
– Latvia
– Japan
– Russia (recently rising in atheism)
– Netherlands
– Czech Republic
– [Insert any country with a high atheist population here]

The atheists countries that are the most celebrated by liberal atheists to declare the supremacy of atheism are the most racist countries on Earth. Years ago when these countries didn’t have very high atheist populations there was much less racism in those countries.

Even a dog is treated better than a non-white male in liberal atheist countries like Sweden and Denmark. The racism in liberal atheist countries is nothing like the racism in the US which is limited to things like racist jokes/slurs in private, the police targeting certain races, and some isolated incidences.

The racism in liberal atheist countries for non-white males is just daily everyday racism, being intentionally ignored, given angry stares everywhere you go, not being allowed to enter bars/clubs/restaurants, not getting hired for a job, and also racial slurs/jokes, the police targeting certain races, and racist incidences.

You should only try to live in atheist countries like Denmark and Sweden if you are white-looking or a female, otherwise you will just have get use to the racism there or stick to visiting or pretending to be a visitor. Even some Southern and Eastern Europeans experience racism in liberal atheist countries.

If someone wants to find out if a country is racist or not all they have to do is look up how high the atheist population is in that country.

Instead of voicing any opposition to racism all atheists have done is celebrate racist atheists countries and racist atheist biologists.

Atheists all seem to live in a fantasy world where they only think that religious people in the South of the US are racist when in reality 100% of atheist countries are racist. Whenever confronted with atheists being racist all atheists do is change the subject to claiming that Theists are racists,  refuse to acknowledge that any racist atheists exist or condemn and criticize other atheists for being racist, or even worse just agree that they support racism.

No one can give even an example of even one country with a very high atheist population that has low-levels of racism. As the atheist population rises, nationalism also rises in popularity, nationalism is becoming increasingly popular in all countries where atheism is rising fast like Canada and Australia. People have to realize what’s happening to society before atheists/racists take over completely.

We can see that where ever and whenever there is a predominance of atheism, there is always racism, always.

In conclusion from this article we can see that:
– Liberal atheists like Richard Dawkins, James D. Watson, and Richard Lynn all support and agree with scientific racism
– The founder of the Neo-Nazi group “White Aryan Resistance” Tom Metzger, is an atheist
– The majority of White Nationalists are non-Christian, Pagan, atheist, or agnostic
– 100% of atheist countries are racist
– Atheists have remained completely silent in opposition to racism

I can already predict how atheists will react to this article:
– Throw argumentum ad hominems at me, like say “he’s a troll, idiot, fool, moron, etc…” or throw other personal attacks
– Re-define the definition of racism and say things like “Just because I believe some races are genetically superior or inferior in terms of intelligence doesn’t mean that I’m a racist”
– Change the subject to claiming that Theists are racists
– Claim that atheists are not racist, but give no reasoning or explanation as to how or why
– Continue to remain silent in opposition to racism and live in a fantasy world of only believing that Theists are racists

Atheists are inherently hateful people and spend their entire life hating others. Atheists are unable to live peacefully side by side others. They seem to lack any kind of goodness, compassion or kindness. Atheists hate Blacks, Hispanics, Arabs, Jews, Christians, and Muslims. But what I’m really trying to find out is who do atheists hate most, Jews or Muslims?

Such a disgusting low-life it is to be an atheist or a racist (it’s the same thing). These people called atheists are truthfully the very worst form of life that exists, the lowest possible form of life. People have to realize what’s happening to society before these terrible people take over completely. No atheist has or will ever dare speak out against other racist atheists or racist atheist countries so it’s up to Theists to speak out. Atheists are just plain terrible people.

Atheism and racism just fit together like a perfect couple. I mean somethings fit together nicely, but this just fit together so perfectly and so well above and beyond all imagination.

So will atheists ever voice any kind of opposition to other atheists being racist or continue to remain silent in opposition to racism?

[UPDATE 03.12.2012]: Case closed, I’ve already won this debate. All the atheists here have agreed that they believe that certain ethnic groups are genetically more or less intelligent and are therefore racist by definition.So basically all the atheists agree that they are racist but don’t label themselves as racist.Next atheists are going to try to re-define the definition of racism. I don’t really know what atheists consider to be racism but obviously believing that certain ethnic groups are genetically less intelligent or genetically more intelligent is not considered as racism to the atheist/low-life.Eventually atheists will re-define the term “racism” so that nothing can be considered as racism except for violent acts against a race, just like how in modern times liberal atheist Swedes don’t consider anything to be racism except for violent acts.Once society accepts certain ethnic groups being genetically more or less intelligent it will become extraordinarily easily to justify Nazi/nationalist laws (specifically anti-immigration laws). There isn’t much time leftover before atheists take over.I predict that around 2030-2060 once society gives up the dumb delusional creationist idea propounded by the delusional creationist reverend Martin Luther King Jr. that there is something divinely equal about all human beings, that most of the world will become Nazi/nationalist specifically because of the atheist population being higher in the future.I dream of a world without racism, but as long as atheists exist this type of world is quite impossible. We can easily see why in modern times 100% of atheist countries are racist.

Search as much as you want, you’ll never find people as racist and disgusting as these people called “atheists”.

Nazis/atheists rejoice!

I’m the undeniable winner of this debate!

CASED CLOSED.

Advertisements

454 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Joel.c / Jul 8 2016 5:15 pm

    I found this post particularly offensive above most of the other anti atheist posts I have seen as you have basicly said that people who don’t believe religion, are racist, I am an atheist, I am not racist in any way, I have good friends from a lot of races. All my atheist friends are anti racists.

  2. Touched up and liked it. / Jun 28 2016 11:55 pm

    well reading that and the comments was a complete waste of half an hour id never get back. a lot of straw manning going on here ” turned me on a little ” the constant lack of apparant understanding or knowledge of what Atheist means, by somehow equating ” not believing in my god must therefore mean you are wrong and evil ” whilst conveniently forgetting that practically means the entire world……..and then to top it off that must somehow mean atheists are more likely to murder and rape because we dont believe in a higher being? like belief is the default 😉 and it was after reading these bogus unsubstantiated claims made by the religious who I must assume are either completely devoid of the ability to do unbiased research and cross checking of facts and figures, or simply pick the first thing ken ham says and shoves it up ones anus in order to tickle a new found sweet spot of laughably gullible ignorance. it was right there and then that I had decided something rather profound…….it was then sir that I said ” fuck it ” and switched browser to incognito mode to jack off to asian foot porn……and now I am glad to report that I have ejaculated my frustrations with your lack of intellectual honesty/modesty away into the palm of my hand, and I shall cherish it for all but a moment ( becaude then it like totally turns watery and like all weird and shit ) I HAVE PROVIDED VITAL NUTRIENTS FOR THE GROWTH OF BACTERIAL COLONIES THAT SHALL INEVITABLY FEED UPON MY SACRIFICED PROTO CHILDREN…..what have you done today?

  3. Anonymous / May 29 2016 3:58 am

    What a crock

  4. An atheist / Jan 30 2016 5:57 pm

    You sound like a very sad and hateful person

    • alfred abraham / May 16 2016 12:29 am

      I agree. But why is it that atheists like Richard Dawkins seem comfortable with scientific racism? Could it be because science alone cant affirm the equal dignity of all human beings? That you need religion to establish a firmer case for equality?

      • Anonymous / May 16 2016 1:52 am

        Science is a tool ; when used by atheists it becomes inevitably racist because atheists have no consistent and deeply rooted principles.

        It is not hateful to claim that atheists have no moral values , it’s a fact. Like soccer players , movie goers , binge drinkers ,cigarette smokers , etc… , the atheists have no specific reasons to advocate race equality.

  5. itsnobody / Aug 2 2015 10:43 pm

    There’s one thing that doesn’t fit into Richard Lynn’s (liberal atheist) claim of Africans having lower IQs, it’s Barbados.

    Barbados has a high HDI, is 93% African, and has an extremely low population of less than 300,000.

    Cardinal Warde is from Barbados, he’s a full Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, he got his PhD. in physics at Yale University – http://web.mit.edu/provost/sef-directory/profiles/e1000057.html, he’s published more than 140 papers – http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cardinal_Warde/publications .

    Physics is known as one of the hardest majors because you have to understand advanced mathematics and be able to correctly apply it to real-world problems, it’s not like basic arithmetic. Electrical Engineering is also known as one of the hardest majors.

    MIT was ranked as the #1 University in the entire world by QS World University ranking.

    In order to be a full professor at MIT you have to have an extremely high GPA, full understanding of a subject, and show outstanding achievements.

    Having a PhD. in physics and being a full Professor at a top University means that you’re like Einstein!

    Professor Emeritus of mathematics at Brock University, Velmer Headley is also from Barbados, he has published papers in prestigious mathematics journals like the Journal of Mathematical Analysis & Applications and Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society.

    Multiple studies show full Professors and PhD. physics graduates as having among the highest IQs in the entire world.

    In a population size as low as Barbados’ it should be impossible for there to be even one person with an IQ high enough to have a PhD. in physics and be a full Professor at MIT from Barbados if the Lynn’s IQ data is correct.

    The average SAT score of Barbadian students applying to US Universities is 1300 (on the 1600 scale), which comes to an average IQ of 130 for Barbadian students (source: A Simple Justice: The Challenge of Small Schools, pg. 79).

    An average IQ this high might seem inaccurate but it is consistent with Barbados’ high HDI, and having PhD. physicists and full Professors at the top Universities from Barbados in a population size as low as Barbados’ (< 300,000).

    In a population size of less than 300,000, if there really is a low average IQ just one or two smart people should be impossible unless the standard deviation is high, if the SD is low it would be impossible!

    Barbados’ achievements (population size < 300,000):
    – Cardinal Warde, from Barbados, full Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, PhD. in physics at Yale University, published more than 140 papers
    – Velmer Headley, from Barbados, Professor Emeritus of mathematics at Brock University, has published papers in prestigious mathematics journals
    – James Sisnett, from Barbados, is the 13th oldest verified male in history (died at age 113)
    – The average SAT score of Barbadian students applying to US Universities is 1300 (on the 1600 scale)
    – Barbados has a high HDI (Human Development Index)

  6. Atheists are racist / Darwinist / Jun 3 2015 3:51 pm

    The country with the largest amount of participants expressing an aversion to living next to people of other races was China, where a reported 71.8% of Hong Kong residents would refuse to have such neighbors.

     

    http://elitedaily.com/news/world/this-map-reveals-the-most-racist-countries-in-the-world/

    China is the most atheist country and a tyranny as well as the the belligerent USSR who failed to prove Darwin was right. 

    In the mid 1920s, Professor Ilya Ivanov began his project, funded by the Soviet government, to hybridize humans and apes by artificial insemination.6 The funds for his project equaled over one million in today’s dollars. Ivanov presented his human-ape hybrid experiment idea to the World Congress of Zoologists in Graz, and in 1924 he completed his first experiment in French Guinea. He first attempted to produce human male/chimpanzee female hybrids, and all three attempts failed. Ivanov also attempted to use ape males and human females to produce hybrids but was unable to complete the experiment because at least five of the women died.

     

    Charles Lee Smith wrote that the objective of Ivanov’s experiments was to achieve “artificial insemination of the human and anthropoid species, to support the doctrine of evolution, by establishing close kinship between man and the higher apes.”5 The project was supported by The American Association for the Advancement of Atheism  because it was seen as “proof of human evolution and therefore of atheism.”8 When applying to the Soviet government for funds, Ivanov emphasized the importance of his research for anti-religious propaganda.7

     

    In the end, the research failed and has not been attempted again, at least publicly. Today we know it will not be successful for many reasons, and Professor Ivanov’s attempts are, for this reason, a major embarrassment to science. One problem is humans have 46 chromosomes–apes 48–and for this reason the chromosomes will not pair up properly even if a zygote is formed. Another problem is a conservatively estimated 40 million base pair differences exist between humans and our putative closest evolutionary relatives, the chimps. These experiments are the result of evolutionary thinking and they failed because their basic premise is false.11

     

    http://www.icr.org/article/human-ape-hybridization-failed-attempt/

    @ Heige :
    As we can see , atheist experimentations are not only stupid , they’re racist and cruel. 

    • Helge / Jun 4 2015 3:03 am

      Wow, you found examples of misdoings done by atheists. But that does not prove your point.

      “The country with the largest amount of participants expressing an aversion to living next to people of other races was China, where a reported 71.8% of Hong Kong residents would refuse to have such neighbors.

      China is the most atheist country and a tyranny as well as the the belligerent USSR who failed to prove Darwin was right.”

      Blah blah. You are as always cherry-picking your results.
      The Hong Kong distrust in other races has nothing to do with atheism. In fact, if looking up Hong Kong and atheist you would find that there are not that many atheists in Hong Kong as a significant amount of the 50% of the population that does not belongs to an organised religion believe in Chinese folk religions. An atheist does not believe in a higher being, remember.

      “According to official statistics for the year 2010, about 50% of the population belongs to an organised religion. A significant amount of the adherents of non-indigenous Chinese religions are Hong Kong people of non-Chinese descent.”
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Hong_Kong

      China as a whole are ranked among the “Most tolerant countries”, even if they are among the worst in this section. So again your claims are false.

      I sincerely hope that you are a troll, as your arguments and views on other people are appalling. I pity you in the same way I pity other feeble minded hate mongers like racists and homophobics. Get a life!

      • Anonymous / Jun 4 2015 10:58 am

        China is a racist country not because of the ones who live in Hong-Kong. 99,9% of Chinese don’t live in Hong-Kong. Learn to read.
        There is just no free speech in China except in Hong-Kong.
        You also can see on the map that France is a racist country but you probably don’t know that France has the largest atheist population ( about 25%) in Western Europe.

        If atheists support cruelties made against what they unanimously called in private conversations “inferior races” then we can say that atheists are unanimously racist. By the way , only atheists condone such experiences because atheists forbide only religion.

      • Helge / Jun 5 2015 7:51 pm

        Haha! Read the correct article yourself before mock others. You found a different article about the same survey, but this article had mistakes that was corrected in the article I referred to (“An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Hong Kong and Bangladesh were two of the world’s least racially tolerant countries. We are happy to clarify this is not the case.”)The article I refer to has a table where the different countries are placed into categories based on how racist they are and China are among the most tolerant countries (but among the worst of these).

        Regarding France. It is correct that they are both among the most atheist countries in Europe and among the least tolerant countries in Europe. But from that you could not possible draw the conclusion that they are intolerant because of the ~25% atheists. Using your logic I could say that they are intolerant because they speak French or because the majority is religious. This also makes no sense. Most complicated issues have multiple explanations and to draw solid conclusions you need to factor in more than the one you prefer.

        To identify WHY France are intolerant you need to look at various explanations, not just conclude with the one you prefer. Most people with more insight would conclude that the distrust of other races are more a result of failed immigration policies and integration of immigrants. BTW: The leader of National Front is catholic.

        Racists use the same kind of twisted logic as you. “Blacks are overrepresented in jail, therefore black people are dangerous” (atheists, by the way, are underrepresented). “Most countries in Africa are poor, due to race”. Most people understand that the first part of these two quotes are correct, but the conclusion is wrong. Why colored people are overrepresented in jail and many Africa are poor are complicated issues and this is not due to traits of a race.

        But you probably don’t care about logic of your lack of logic. Your message is that atheists are evil and to try to explain everything that is wrong in the world on atheists (like the Nazis blame the Jews/blacks for all problems). Do you seriously believe this or is it just to fuel your hate propaganda (not sure what is the saddest!). The problem in the world is that people don’t respect each other across races, belief systems, gender and sexuality, not that someone don’t believe in the same god as you. So stop spreading your hate and do something constructive yourself before blaming others.

        If I did a statistical analysis of “most racist countries” survey and compared it to the atheist population I would most probably get that “atheist countries” are less racist than religious ones. Doing a check on gender equality, homophobia and quality of life, I would get the same results (atheist countries would overall come out better). But again, these issues are more complicated than just religion or lack of religion (well, homophobia and gender equality are linked to religion).

        Even though I have proved that many of your arguments does not make any sense (most people would be skeptical when you say easily dismissive crap like: “100% of atheists are racists”), you will probably continue spreading you lies, misconceptions and hate, so why bother! Signing off.

      • @ Heige / Jun 5 2015 8:57 pm

        Here are the words of an atheist Front National member :

        http://amveat.free.fr/atheeFN.pdf

        Translated with Google :

         
        Our electoral weight
        […]
        In other words, the more than 4 million FN voters, atheists represent the great majority of those voting for the FN !!!.
        […]
        Atheists in the “National Movement”, a novelty? No, we could cite many examples of atheists: Marine Le Pen [..]

         

        It seems to me that Marine Le Pen who leads this army of atheist/racists is not a catholic since a very long time. 

        This is the original French version :

         Notre poids électoral

        Autrement dit, sur les plus de 4 millions de votants FN, les athées représentent la grande majorité des votants pour le FN !!!.

        Une nouveauté ?

        Des athées au sein du « mouvement national », une nouveauté ? Non, nous pourrions citer de nombreux exemples d’athées : de Marine Le Pen à Alain de Benoist, en passant par L.-F. Céline, Rebatet, etc. Et plus spécifiquement ceux qui s’approchent de la tendance rationaliste : Ernest Renan, Louis Rougier, Pierre Gripari, Paul-Eric Blanrue, etc.
        Le sociologue Pierre Lagrange écrit ainsi : « Il existe une longue tradition de rationalisme d’extrême droite depuis Barrès jusqu’à certains clubs rationalistes actuels ». (Allusion au Cercle Zététique et au Cercle Ernest Renan).

         

        Lol …

      • Don Camillo / Jun 5 2015 10:32 pm

        Wrongdoing ?

        Sane person would call these racist experiments : “absolute monstrosity”.
        Beige , you do think like a nazi piece of shit , don’t you ?

      • Petchy / Jun 6 2015 7:58 am

        i agree with you mate. itsnobody is just a moron. there is no proof that a god exists. religion is just a way to control the masses thats why there has been so many religions throughout the world. itsnobody doesnt believe in zeus or thor or RA and yet these were the primary gods once. its only a matter of time till christianity is replaced and only becomes mythology same as islam and hindu and judaism. if there was only one god there would only be one religion but its in our nature to create our own gods. most religious people say how can earth exist it has to have a creator well then what created god he can’t just magically exist. the cookie monster came out of my cookie jar last night and told me he ate jesus 😛
        lets see itsnobody prove me wrong.
        I proved him wrong before he didn’t have the answers so lets see him do it again.

      • Don Camillo / Jun 6 2015 8:17 am

        You are a moron Petchy.
        I was talking about Heige who claims that cruelties on black women are petty problems.

        INDEED , Itsnobody does a good job by proving atheists are white trash.

      • Sarthe 72 / Jun 6 2015 10:04 pm

        Hi,
        I will not dispute with posters about racism & atheism because I don’t speak fluent English. I am French , I wrote this post with the help of my girlfriend’s brother. 

        I am a former anarchist/atheist recently converted to evangelical Christian faith. 
        I converted months after I watched “Pusher”, a Danish movie that was like a mirror which reflected the life of the many white trash in Europe who ignore God.
        At this time , most of my atheist friends were like the characters of this movie :gross.
        Atheists are selfish : obsessed by sex , easy money , alcohol , drugs and white-race domination. 
        My new Christian girlfriend also really helped me to open my eyes. God bless her.

        The one – Heig – who says the Front National is a Christian party is not only an cruel person , he is a liar : the French Catholic Church do not endorse Marine Le Pen neither endorsed his father.

  7. Helge / Jun 3 2015 10:17 am

    Atheists relies on facts and science rather than empty beliefs.

    Here are some surveys that concludes that religious people are more racist than atheists:
    http://mic.com/articles/29397/religious-people-tend-to-be-more-racist-study-finds
    http://www.centerforinquiry.net/blogs/entry/racism_is_linked_to_religious_dogmatism/

    Did not find any surveys claiming the opposite, just ranting from religious ignorants like you.

    You claim:
    “I’ve noticed that the most racist countries are also the countries with high atheist populations like:
    – Sweden
    – New Zealand
    – Norway
    – Denmark
    – Latvia”
    Funny that out of the 5 first “evil atheist” countries (I’m from Norway) on your list, 4 are among the 12 least racist countries in the world according to this study:
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325502/Map-shows-worlds-racist-countries-answers-surprise-you.html
    Among the 8 most racist countries in the world only South-Korea has a significant non-religious population (aprox 45%).

    In your text you have no actual proof to back up your claims. Just empty claims and namedropping atheist racists. Pathetic!

    • Helge / Jun 3 2015 10:38 am

      Forgot to mention that the reason that Denmark was not included in the least racist list was that they were not included in the study (but most probably they are as little racist as the other Scandinavian countries) and that a majority of the countries in the most racist list have a atheist population close to 0%.
      Also to claim that the 13% atheist population in Russia are to blame for the racism in the country is a joke, but not a good one.

    • Anonymous / Jun 3 2015 2:51 pm

      Here are some surveys that concludes that religious people are more racist than atheists

      Very reliable isn’t it …

      Who claimed during centuries that Africans are not human beings according to evolutionary scale ?
      Evolutionary scale is not a religious belief , isn’t it.

      Who tried to crossbreed so called inferior races with apes ?
      Who support eugenism ?
      Religious people ?

      • Helge / Jun 4 2015 2:39 am

        If you believe that a survey is incorrect you should point out faults in the survey method, not come up with more random examples of how evil atheists are. Anybody could come up with a never ending list of wrong acts done by religious people (even in the name of religion). But that would prove or disprove the claim that “basically 100% of atheists are racist”.

        The point is that your claims like: “Everybody knows that basically 100% of atheists are racists (atheists especially know). The preservation of the race is the utmost goal for the atheist or racist (it’s the same thing). blah blah”
        …are not based on facts at all. Like your religion. 😉

        You could say that “basically 100% of atheists I I KNOW are racists”, but that would just say something about who you know, not anything about atheists. Do you even know that ALL atheist you know are racist? Probably not. Do you know the religion (or lack of of) of all your acquaintance.

        Claims like “Everybody knows that basically 100% of atheists are racists (atheists especially know).” are not only ignorant, but disrespectful to other people, in the same way as racism. If you switch out “atheist” with “blacks” or “jews” and racist with any other negative word you would see that you atheist hate propaganda is no different than racism. You hate people that are different than YOU, just because they are different, just like a racist.

      • Sarthe 72 / Jun 7 2015 7:29 am

        @ Heige ,

        “…not come up with more random examples of how evil atheists are”.

        Are you stupid ?
        The use of black women to prove white atheists were right to support darwinism became a scandal because the atheist scientist violated Christian rules.
        Religions opposed to the use of African women as guinea pigs , not the atheists.

      • Don Camillo / Jun 7 2015 8:39 am

        Yes , Heige is a moron. Atheist associations sponsor the most racist projects ever done before , but he does not understand why one believes atheists are racist.
        He does not even know that China is a racist country because this atheist regime persecutes Tibetans , Uyghurs and many other ethnic minorities. The Chinese Communist Party even instructs the average Chinese to discriminate those who don’t embrace state atheism.
        How can such an idiot understand that approving barbaric experiments on African women -to prove that the Bible is wrong- is deeply racist ? That’s what many atheist organisations throughout the world did.
        There’s no better evidence that atheism promotes racial theories.
        By chance , we may have found the one and only atheist – Heige – who believes the Bible is right and the atheistic cornerstones are abominable. 😂

    • Riley / Jul 14 2015 9:33 pm

      @ heige

      Scandinavian countries have Christian/Lutheran laws ; there was no separation of church and religion. So atheists/racists still don’t rule thiese countries for the moment.

      • itsnobody / Jul 14 2015 9:49 pm

        Just the no true scotsman fallacy.

        They are atheists.

        Get over it.

        You and your nasty atheist kind will NEVER EVER come out to oppose racism because you care more about making atheists look good than you do about ending racism and White Nationalism.

  8. WERECRAPOP / May 10 2015 5:52 pm

    Of course their racist ’cause they love Satan (STUPID IDIOTS)

  9. Mallon / May 7 2015 11:21 pm

    Dawkins didn’t even mention race. Genes definitely play a role in intelligence potential and development. It’s pretty obvious when you can’t converse with any animal other than a human being. Dawkins was not however denying the plasticity of the brain. James D. Watson’s racial views are reviled by the atheist community. The internet’s skeptics even diagnosed him with Nobel Disease. I haven’t even heard of the other guy.

    • Don Camillo / May 8 2015 12:04 am

      You lie : Dawkins has implicitly ( at least ) asserted many times that white men are on top of evolutionary ladder. In Europe , most of atheists still secretly support scientific racism which is based on the hierarchy of evolutionary ladder.
      Of course , Chinese atheists do not share this view because they do not want to be considered as half-apes. That’s why the nationalists in China try to reverse the racist theories hidden behind the evolutionary scale.

  10. Youarenobody / Apr 10 2015 4:28 am

    The creator of this page that is. I mean no hostilities towards Sam ward

  11. Youarenobody / Apr 10 2015 4:27 am

    You are a worthless sack of shit and you should burn in a fire after choking on your own feces you monster of the human race.

  12. Sam Ward / Apr 10 2015 4:23 am

    How dare you make such harsh accusations with no proof. Especially towards the countries that are supposedly more racist than the others, how do you measure racism anyways. I’ve met Japanese, Russian, and Swedish people before and they aren’t racist they value their own culture but they don’t say it’s better than anyone else’s. With the quotes you are taking what one person says as the representation of the whole embodiment of atheists. Richard Dawkins didn’t even say anything racist either, all he said was that genes are bogus and uses the term facist in a satiracal sense. Not to mention you keep using the terms “always” and “100% of the time” terms that people use when they have no proof to back them up. You keep citing the negative accounts of atheists and completely ignore the atrocities committed by Christians and Catholics like the holocaust because Adolf Hitler was Christian, the inquisition which was when the Spanish forced their religion on to the people of the Americas by raping, killing, pillaging, and torturing all of the natives that refused to convert, nearly every major shooting was commited by a Christian, burnings on charges of witchcraft which is a completely nonexistent crime but it they do it in the bible so you Christians have to follow suit, one of the Rwandan genocide’s biggest encouragement was from religious rivalries. The pope even went to Africa, the continent most riddled with AIDS to tell them to not where condoms. You are the biggest fucking idiot to ever exist, you have no proof and if anyone is racist it’s you. You are racist towards atheists. Are there atheists who are racist, yes. Are there racists in every religion to ever exist, absolutely.

    • Greta / Apr 10 2015 10:29 am

      Hitler did not marry at church because as an atheist he loathed religions.
      The atheists condone murders , rape , torture , incest and all other evil things as long as one has no religion. The only evil in atheism is faith.

      Try to read some book…

      • Petchy / Apr 10 2015 4:39 pm

        BAHAHA
        Well for one adolf hitler was not an atheist he just didn’t agree with Christianity and wanted it wiped out of Germany. Also the Korean and the bible both condome murder torture and incest. I mean technically if you follow Christianity we are all incest because we all come from Adam and Eve. Atheists also have faith I have faith in my family my friends my job and I even have faith in myself 🙂 i don’t need a god to have faith in fact since religious people need to prove that a god exists and can’t I find it fascinating how Atheists can be considered sub-human when christiandom used to burn Atheists alive at the stake.. Religions condone unimaginable cruelty.

      • Greta / Apr 10 2015 7:45 pm

        Apparently you did not understand that when talking about religion one does not speak about faith in your Play Station or your skateboard.
        Apparently you don’t even know what is incest.
        Apparently you are a stupid , aren’t you ?

      • Petchy / Apr 10 2015 9:06 pm

        incest is when relatively breed with each other. adam and eves children interbred supposably so therefore they were incest and we are all inbred. what does a playstation or skateboard have to do with this. do you even know the definition of faith?

        faith
        feɪθ/
        noun
        noun: faith

        complete trust or confidence in someone or something.
        “this restores one’s faith in politicians”
        synonyms: trust, belief, confidence, conviction, credence, reliance, dependence;

        i have faith in my friends my family my job and im myself infact i probaby have more faith than you do.

  13. Anonymous / Jul 9 2014 7:32 am

    My mother used to work as a nurse in prisons and told me that she was as skeptical as the different judges during the trial concerning some inmates who claim to be Christians. Actually , the most dangerous inmates do not attend any religious service when detained and have practically no religious culture. Therefore , since death penalty was abolished in Europe , they do not even try to speak to a priest or a pastor during their detention.

  14. Anonymous / Jul 3 2014 10:39 am

    Atheists don’t spend their time hating people. They hate people like you who try to hate them. I’m an atheist. My best friend is a christian, and so are all my others. I don’t hate religions like Jewish and muslim, but I do hate the tallaban. Stop guessing and typing your opinions and predictions. They are wrong. There is no war, you just want to start one.

    • Shlomo B. / Jul 3 2014 11:58 am

      I know many atheists who spend their time to Google check whether the prominent people are Jews or not , have Italian grand-parents etc…

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 12:01 am

        Bullshit.
        I am an Atheist and was engaged to a jewish woman and i know many good italians. you really do talk shit you know. the only people that seem to hate the jews are christians and muslims

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 1:45 am

        Why don’t you read what the atheist Tom Metzger leader of White Aryan Resistance wrote on this page about Hitler ? 

        “We will have to deal with Christianity in a tougher way than hitherto. We must settle accounts with this Christianity, this greatest of plagues that could have happened to us in our history, which has weakened us in every conflict. If our generation does not do it then it would I think drag on for a long time. We must overcome it within ourselves.
        – Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler; Speech to top leaders of The SS, June 9, 1942 Berlin 
         

        He also said : Whats naturally wrong with being a racial separatist.Doe that cause you to loose sleep? 

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 3:44 am

        whats that got to do with jews and italians?
        christianity has a very cruel and dark history just like islam. after the way christians treated atheists back in the 11th century what do you expect? christians burned atheists alive.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 3:54 am

        U a fucking idiot !
        I’ve read that the atheist nazis exterminated hundreds of french christian civilians -including all children- by burning them in the local parish. 
        Regular atheists who knew this event really happened said in private discussion that Hitler’s troops did a very good job. 
        And none of the atheists I speak know Metzger because they’re not Americans , but they evidently agree with the White Aryan Resistance who hates Jews , Italians ,Blacks , Muslims and Christians as well.

        http://www.oradour.info/

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 4:05 am

        Nazi’s wern’t atheist ya fucking moron. Nazis were Catholic. Religious people hate each other more than atheists hate anyone I mean look at the syrian civil war. What ever happened to opinion. If a person has the right to preach religion (an opinion) than people have the right to speak out against it like an atheist. thats pretty well all an atheist is a person that believes its impossible for a god to exist and its proven more and more everyday. tell me do you believe in santa claus? have you met elvis’s ghost? have you ever seen zeus? because if you believe in god than you have to believe in all these things too. so open ya fuckin head and think ya gullible moron.

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 4:09 am

        A census completed in May 1939, more than six years into the Nazi era[2] and incorporating the annexation of mostly Catholic Austria into Germany, indicates 54% of Germans considered themselves Protestant, (including non-denominational Christians), 40% Catholic, 3.5% identifying as “gottgläubig” (lit. “believers in god”, a non-denominational nazified belief in god, often described as predominately creationist and deistic.[3]), and 1.5% non-religious.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 4:26 am

        Lol , u really a fucking idiot. The rest of the text you quote underlines that nazism was based on scientific atheism , and the nazis wanted to eradicate religions. You really believed I will trust you without Google check ?

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 4:44 am

        Please tell me your just trolling noone can be this stupid. 54% of germans were protestant protestant is christian. 40% where catholic. also catholic austria was annexed into germany as germany was a catholic country. please read before you type champ. thanks for the laugh.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 4:46 am

        Moreover , the text you quote underlines the nazis reduced the Christian numbers in just 6 years. See , you just a liar ! In 20 years , the nazis would have completely reduced the christian percentage to less than 10%. 

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 4:50 am

        LOL. Errr no it didnt. also the nazis believed in a creator they were not atheist only 1.5% of the german population was atheist. as with iamnobody you are defeated utterly defeated.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 4:56 am

        Just copy/paste the end of the text you found here. Be honest once in your lousy lifetime.
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany

        Lol, you too lazy ?

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 5:03 am

        ahhh yes gotglaeubig

        Gottglaeubig was a term coined by the Nazis. It replaced the Christian
        religions with one of their own, which they called “Gottgläubig”,
        meaning ‘believing in any gods, as long as it isn’t the only God and
        Christ’. They wern’t atheist do you even understand what his means?

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 5:08 am

        The full text of this Encyclical (original language German) can be found here. Pius XI and (the-then-future Piusx) XII collaborated on it. It was smuggled into Germany in 1937 and read in all churches. Know this – the Nazis hated the Catholic Church and her “Jew-God”. “Good” Nazis did not belong to the Church, instead they adopted the term “gottglaeubig” (“god-believing”) for official documents. Hitler himself only spoke of “Vorsehung” – “Providence” – not Divine Providence.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 5:10 am

        This what you try to hide in the text you partially quoted :

        Persecution of the Catholic Church in Germany followed the Nazi takeover. Hitler moved quickly to eliminate political catholicism. Amid harassment of the Church, the Reich concordat treaty with the Vatican was signed in 1933, and promised to respect Church autonomy. Hitler routinely disregarded the Concordat, closing all Catholic institutions whose functions were not strictly religious. Clergy, nuns, and lay leaders were targeted, with thousands of arrests over the ensuing years. The Church accused the regime of “fundamental hostility to Christ and his Church”. Smaller religious minorities such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Bahá’í Faith were banned in Germany, while the eradication of Judaism by the genocide of its adherents was attempted. It is generally believed by historians that Hitler and the Nazis intended to eradicate Christianity in Germany after winning victory in the war.[7][8]

         
        Good by retarded I’ve no time to waste with an uncultivated immoral person like you.

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 5:14 am

        Gottglaeubig itself means god believing in english mate
        so the arguments forfeit for you
        an atheist is a person that doesnt believe in any form of deity
        they dont believe a god can possibly exist
        you cant be god believing and an atheist too
        thats not how it works
        you lose mate

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 5:21 am

        Yes , I know , atheists can’t lie and never hide their beliefs.
        But Tom Metzger did during years by hiding his atheism. 
        Bye retarded !

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 5:29 am

        Tom Metzger aint a nazi his a white supremist. since pretty well the entire Ku Klux clan is christian i fail to see why one atheist being in it so so relevant. nazis were not exactly white supremists you know they were nationalists they were german supremists and they were at war with nearly the entire white race. if germans were black than nazis would be the same way,

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 5:49 am

        Once again you lie :

         During his Ku Klux Klan days Metzger held strictly extreme-right views but later came to see himself as more aligned with the left than the right, on the grounds that the right was too mired in conservatism and he identified with the far left’s militant revolutionary stance. This shift coincided with his leaving the Klan to start his own group, White Aryan Resistance. Metzger is often described as a Third positionist because of his identification with the left. Among other things he has praised the former Soviet Union as a “white workers state”, promoted Jack London’s socialist and anti-fascist novel The Iron Heel, published cartoons attacking American conservatives for cheering for black U.S. athletes over white Soviet Bloc athletes in the Olympics, and proclaimed support for striking union workers in the American Midwest and for hard green group Earth First! – in both cases because they were fighting against companies who happened to be owned by Jews.
        However, any support for the militant left he seems to have comes to a grinding halt if the people in question are not white. He is, above all else, a white racist and describes his ideology first and foremost as racist. Any support for the left he has is strictly secondary, and any support for the conservative right tertiary, and in either case only if they coincide with the interest of white racism.
        In 1980 he barely squeaked out a victory in a three-way Democratic Party primary for U.S. Congress in California, running as an openly white supremacist Klan leader (this was before his claimed shift to the “left”.) This was in a heavily Republican Orange County district and he lost the general election 87% to 13%.
        After his trial he began advocating a “lone wolf” strategy and advising white racists against joining any established groups.
        In 2010 he ran as an independent candidate for U.S. Congress in Indiana. His campaign site lists a populist platform (repeal NAFTA, jail for BP oil executives, cut military spending, bring the troops home, end foreign aid, moratorium on immigration, etc.) without mentioning White Aryan Resistance or his role in the white supremacist movement. Politics1.com gets it right by describing him as a white supremacist/neo-Nazi and frequent candidate.

        Religious views  

        Metzger was Christian Identity in the 1970s but left it about the same time as he left the Klan to start White Aryan Resistance. He identifies as an agnostic and has been supportive of Odinism, Satanism, atheism, the Church of the Creator as well as Identity, as long as the person in question is above all a white racist.

         

        Plus , under the nickname of Terrible Tommy he admitted here :
        https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110111022910AArfP1e
        that many KKK members are in fact closet atheists, not Christian at all . 
         
        It’s well-know that atheists like to burn crosses and churches.

        Hell is gonna be a good place for you retarded , bye !

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 5:58 am

        church of the creator
        satanism
        both means his not an atheist
        you really dont have a fucking clue how to get out of this do you
        bloody hell im glad im not like you
        an atheist doesnt believe in any form of a deity therefore satanism is out. satanists are not atheists i dont believe satan exists i dont believe in angels and i dont believe in any kind of super natural.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 6:45 am

        learn to read stupid :

        [..] atheism, the Church of the Creator as well as Identity, as long as the person in question is above all a white racist.

         
        It seems that your brain is peeping out of your asshole.

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 1:52 pm

        atheists oppse christianity so ofcourse he supposed them.
        “He was originally Christian Identity. I don’t think his rejection of religion is based on science, rather it is based on a aesthetic rejection of Christianity as not suited for the white man.
        you christian pricks look what yas create your no better than islam

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 2:40 pm

        I’m a Jew moron.

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 2:44 pm

        and whats that gt to do with anything and why do i give a shit.
        i was engaged to a jew and i have to say with all the jews i have met you are a disgrace to judaism.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 2:53 pm

        So you were engaged with a Jewish girl ? What does it prove ? Hitler bodyguard and chauffeur named Emil Maurice was his Jewish sex partner. This one never was deported.  Just Google check ! See also Clara Petacci , the Jewish Mussolini’s mistress. Mussolini claimed he did not hate the Jews but finally help Hitler to exterminate them. , because atheists consider the Jews in the evolutionary scale as less than so-called “real whites”.

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 3:54 pm

        im well aware of all this and jesus was in fact a brown skinned semite rather than a white skinned blue eyed white man. jesus was jewish. this is the point im trying to make why do you keep bringing religion into racism. it makes you sound like a total fucking idiot much like iamnobody i guess its because you both really are nobody. i have a great life and dont need some fantasy to fall back on when things get tough. the more you comment the more you seem to show your not jewish at all your some confused little boy with no clue what his talking about. your trying to reach for answers because you havent got any. islam and christianity are both heavily modelled on the old testament which i find hilarious because the da vinci code is also based on the old testament and people seem to see it as myth and the coran and bible as fact. i mean fuckin wow.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 6:07 pm

        My father is a Christian so I know a lot about Christianity because I was raised with my Christian family when I became a teenager. I just don’t care what you think about me , I wrote comments because a Christian friend of mine told me to read your stupid shit when you hilariously commented ten days ago that computers were made by atheists. Lol , you such an idiot !

        Atheism hates all religions especially the one which inspired the Christians and the Muslims : Judaism. 
        I know that some Jewish atheists hate to see the truth about evolutionary scale but when facing the truth , they mourn. Obviously you have nothing to say about the Jews who slept with racist atheists like you who exterminated their brothers and sisters along with Christians , handicapped , etc… in order to improve science and their superior race. 

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 6:17 pm

        I never said computers were made by atheists i said computers were made by scientists and the majority of scientists are atheist because they base there work of hard evidence not just faith. unless it was another peter on here Explain to me how despising religion makes me a racist? you cant be racist towards religion you idiot. atheists dont hate religion they just find religion to be a load of shit, atheists have never done anything to jews or to christians it was christians that tried to exterminate us. please get your facts straight it makes you sound like such a fuckin idiot when you say stupid things like this. i dont think you have met to many atheists but i have met hundreds of christians dozens of jews and muslims so i think i have the upper hand on this one sport.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 7:03 pm

        As my name doesn’t sound Jewish because my father is a Christian , atheists I know do not suspect I’m a Jew so I can hear what they really think deep down inside about the Jews. They’re really nasty. That’s the way I learnt that many atheists Google check whether prominent persons have Jewish roots or are pure whites. 
        It is not the religions which classified mankind according to skin color , it is the atheists who permanently claim they have hard evidence about their superiority. 

        What historical facts such an idiot like you can understand ?
        In Mexico , during decades atheists tried to eradicate Catholicism in the beginning of the 20th century. 
        In France , Christians were killed en masse during the revolution. 
        In Germany, Russia, Poland , Romania , nazis and commies persecuted all religions.
        In Asia ( Cambodia , North Korea , Vietnam , China ) atheists were not less cruel than their European counterparts. 
        In the Middle East atheistic regimes tied to the Soviet Union martyrised the Muslims during the Cold War. 
        Only North America , Australia and few other countries have not suffered from brutal atheists because they never came to power over there. 

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 7:17 pm

        LMAO
        what does what christians think of jews matter with atheists. atheists dont have the same views as cristians ya numb skull. whats with this superiority bullshit atheists dont think there superior. we arnt the idiots going around thinking that there saved that some higher being actually gives a flying fuck about thee miserable little lives. lmao christianity has the most cruelest history of any other group in human history. cambodia and china arnt atheist countries nor is vietnam and north korea isnt really either it just has a fuck up for a leader. lol muslims have been slaughtering atheists for 800 years and you worry because atheists got a few back on them? LMAO
        Also australia is 25% atheist its the fastest growing err religion in Australia and the second largest next to catholicism. Australia on top 5 of the world charts in pretty well everything. also for muslims well look at isis lol oh yes there mighty islamic jihadists they represent there religion with such passion showing the true peace of islam. also atheists in north america, australia, uk, germany all have power mate the problem with atheists is they want to be left alone and little christian preachers wont fuck off and contend there there own business. instead there too busy trying to convert us. you ever heard the saying believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see well that applies to god too and i have never heard him and sure as hell never seen him. also your god is a tyrannical mass murderer responsible for over 80 billion deaths look at all the diseases and cancers he created that kill us. yep religion was created to stop people fearing death only to take it straight back and put the fear of god into the people and basically make them slaves. so no fuck that. if for argument sake there is a god what the hell makes you think you got the right religion there are dozens of religions out there how the hell do you know christianity is the right one. chances are your gonna burn in hell like i am but luckily there is no hell.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 4 2014 7:37 pm

        I see crystal clear that you know nothing about neither science nor history. Just Google check during this week-end instead of playing with your tiny dick , you retarded. 
        I understand why you spend your time trolling on the web , you’re too stupid to talk to reasonable persons in real life. We reasonable people don’t have time to waste with uncultivated trash individuals. 
        Have a shitty day.

      • Peter / Jul 4 2014 7:43 pm

        lmao
        you failed mate
        its ok your little mind is stuck in a fantasy world.
        everyone on here i have debated with have lost just like you have here.
        calling nazis and the kkk atheists made you one of the dumbest idiots on here.

  15. Anonymous / Jul 3 2014 10:35 am

    “I can already predict how atheists will react to this article” you did everything in there that you say atheists do. You think of atheists the same way what you think of atheists think of a diferent race.
    You think 100% of atheists are racist, but how do you know EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM is? Thats what I thought. Religion started racism, it started war, child abuse, and faith healing. Parents don’t bring they’re dying child to the hospital so the pastor doesn’t ban them.
    I hope i can encourage people to view you as subhuman.

    • Atheism allows everything except faith / Jul 3 2014 3:15 pm

      There’s no reason atheists reject child abuse.

      • Anonymous / Jul 7 2014 5:11 pm

        In Europe , prominent atheists like Richard Dawkins in Britain and Dany Cohn-Bendit in Germany advocate publicly pedophilia. 

      • Peter / Jul 7 2014 9:15 pm

        LMao
        Mohammad was married to multiple little girls

      • A Plea to Atheists: Pedophilia is next on the Slippery Slope; Let us turn back before it's too late. / Jul 8 2014 2:21 am
      • Peter / Jul 8 2014 5:56 am

        So thats one atheist pedo to every 1000 catholic pedos lol.
        common man stop reaching find real reasons to be down on atheists instead of this pathetic bantering bullshit you come up with. I have proven pretty well everyone i have debated in here wrong

      • G. Mauro / Jul 8 2014 7:52 am

        Richard Dawkins , Michael Muse , Daniel Cohn-Bendit etc..are the spokespersons of the atheist current which secretly encourage pedophilia. As atheists condone everything except faith , there is no reason the atheists who before all support incest don’t support child abuse..at least, in private as long as it remains illegal. 
        Moreover all the vicious priests who rape children admitted they have lost faith , so they are atheists like you. 

      • Peter / Jul 8 2014 4:33 pm

        i dont even know who the fuck they are so they obviously dont speak for me. in fact i dont think its possible to speak for atheists because all atheists have different opinions and views the only thing we have in common is that we dont believe in a god or any form deity. Buddhists are atheists they don’t believe in a god buddha was a real man that was the so called enlightened one basically just a very intelligent man im not sure if being over 600 pounds is nessessarily intelligent however but people worshipped him for him wisdom and thats where buddhism came from. i always found it strange with religion its so immoral and yet supposably you have to be religious to have morals LMAO religion the greatest story ever told. created to take away to fear of death only to take it straight back with the fear of god. geat way to control the masses but still only a load of shit. humans are nothing more than an animal with an exceptionally enhanced intelligence. we are not special in fact of all animals that ever evolved on this planet humans are the far the most detestable and if you believe god created humans in his own image than clearly your god is a fuck up.

      • Ian Montgomery / Jul 8 2014 6:26 pm

        You are such an idiot!   Ian Montgomery 4/4 Fox St Dandenong Vic Australia Mob +61 416981438 (within Aust)0416981438 Skype: globalmonty

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 8 2014 8:06 am

        See , who trusts the atheists ?

        http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0811/atheists_pedophilia.php3#.U7uMN2thiK0

        Why do you think that the Jewish World Review also slams the atheists ? Perhaps it’s because the religious Jews remember that atheists rank the ethnic Jews in the evolutionary scale far below the so-called “true whites” in their scientific teachings.

      • Peter / Jul 8 2014 4:37 pm

        every religion slams one another and who are jews to say that though remember the jews treated atheists just as badly as christians and muslims did basically atheists wernt allowed to express there true beliefs or they’d be murderered for herecy. sI do admit science has done some horrendous things but they have also made the world what it is. the nazis creating the atom bomb was a very evil thing but ifthe americans hadnt captured it ww2 may not have ended for years after 1945 and the atom bomb is also what stopped the russians from attacking the west during the cold war so the atombomb basically stopped ww3 just an example.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 8 2014 7:52 pm

        Stupid ! Atheism has nothing to see with real science. Atheism is about genocide.

      • Peter / Jul 8 2014 8:46 pm

        That is probably by far the dumbest thing I have ever heard. atheism has nothing to do with genocide and christians are the most heinous genocide religion in the world. atheism is simply about not believing in a deity the belief thats its impossible for a deity to exist. its about hard evidence not just from reading a book and thinking you know all the answers. also society will always see atheists are human beings because more and more people in society are seeing through the religious code and realizing its all a load of bullshit and atheism is the fastest growing ‘religion’ on earth. soon atheists will out number both christians and muslims.

      • Ian Montgomery / Jul 8 2014 8:49 pm

        I don’t think the Christians are any worse than the Muslims  as far as attempting genocide.    Ian Montgomery 4/4 Fox St Dandenong Vic Australia Mob +61 416981438 (within Aust)0416981438 Skype: globalmonty

      • Peter / Jul 8 2014 10:16 pm

        well the christians had the crusades and the muslims had the jihads so your probably right there. we would be better off without either. in modern society religion is the primary culperate to nearly every war. we are all citizens of the wold and should all be able to live together in relative harmony i should be able to go to iraq for example and not get my head cut off just for the simple fact im not muslim but as long as there is religion there will always be war. like here in australia i dont think race is the big issue its primarily religion ofcourse racism exists like it does everywhere but religion is the prime concern.

      • Anneke / Jul 9 2014 5:32 am

        All atheists I know say that having sex with mother and sister is supreme love , that is probably the reason why atheists are retard.

      • Peter / Jul 9 2014 4:01 pm

        No they dont. your a sick fuck mate seriously. any form of incest is wrong though according to the bible its ok. religious scholars say that god suspended the laws of incest in the early days of man in order to ensure that man spread on earth. it also talks about many incestuous acts in the bible. maybe before you go bringing this kind of thing up you might want to actually read the bible.

      • Anneke / Jul 9 2014 6:08 pm

        Incestuous persons are indeed mentioned in the Bible because the scriptures don’t hide facts such as crucifixions , decapitations , persecutions… , but incestuous persons are not blessed at all. Many sacred texts opposes incest whereas no atheist text never did because obviously atheism permits everything. For instance , one my schoolmate is an atheist , a real massive slut who was into very dirty things at very early age. Most of her atheist girlfriends also practiced very soon incredible dirty sexual acts including incest and bestiality.
        Most bad boys like atheist girls for sex only but at the end of the day naturally consider them as too vulgar. Notice that most atheist boys prefer religious girls even though atheist girls will do things most well educated girls wouldn’t do.This is hard evidences based on life experience. I have personally never met a 16-year old virgin atheist girl.

      • Peter / Jul 9 2014 6:18 pm

        there is no such thing as a legit atheist text. the bible is just a piss poor translation of the hewbrew bible even some of the words couldnt be translated because there was no word for it in english. what you follow in the bible is basically chinese whispers. been translated so many times that its in no way legit or can be used in any form of proof. the bible justifies incestuous behavior so therefore you aint got an argument.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 9 2014 6:21 pm
      • Shlomo B. / Jul 9 2014 6:49 pm

        Leviticus 20

        17 ‘If a man takes his sister, his father’s daughter or his mother’s daughter, and sees her nakedness and she sees his nakedness, it is a wicked thing.

      • Peter / Jul 9 2014 6:54 pm

        Genesis 20:12
        And yet indeed [she is] my sister; she [is] the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.

        Genesis 17:16
        And I will bless her, and give thee a son also of her: yea, I will bless her, and she shall be [a mother] of nations; kings of people shall be of her.

        Exodus 6:20
        And Amram took him Jochebed his father’s sister to wife; and she bare him Aaron and Moses: and the years of the life of Amram [were] an hundred and thirty and seven years.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 9 2014 7:33 pm

        Yes stupid , at the very beginning there was no written law and no organized religion because there was only ten believers. The first commandments occurred when the Jews were organized as an independent  people because of course thousands of men and women needed laws. Can you understand this ? 

      • Peter / Jul 9 2014 7:43 pm

        LOL do I understand it?
        Do you understand how lunicress it sounds. I think you need some time in the looney bin man. Its normal for a child to have an imaginary friend but usually that passes when they reach 12. You poor religious idiots still believe in an imaginary friend and your in your teens thats sad very very sad.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 9 2014 8:09 pm

        Why don’t you find an atheist girl as vulgar as you are ? I know they’re ugly but you really don’t deserve a pure and pretty educated girl.

      • Peter / Jul 9 2014 8:29 pm

        LOL
        you follow something without question but with no proof your entire life is based on faith and you call me vulgar. this is why religion will always just be a tool to control the masses because idiots like you believe it without question. your just a gullible coward

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 9 2014 9:00 pm

        Cowardice is to try to exploit a naive religious educated girl instead of remaining with your filthy and cynical atheist friends. Face the truth , just stay with your repulsive  community. 

      • Peter / Jul 9 2014 9:07 pm

        LMAo
        explain to be how being intelligent enough to be an atheist makes me filthy?
        i shower twice a day, i dont do drugs, i drink beer, i have no criminal record. so explain to me exactly how im filthy. see this is why i cant take you seriously you really are just a bad joke. your just like imanobody saying stupid shit about people that you know nothing about. religious people are cowards one they are terified of death and so they try to find some form of eternal life like heaven and second religious people are so terrified of there god that they have made themselves slaves to it. its so pathetic i cant believe we are in the 21st century and idiots still believe this stuff. also my relationship with my ex fiance is none of your business so dont bring it up again.

      • Shlomo B. / Jul 9 2014 10:24 pm

        Religious people are much less afraid of death according to many statistics. Atheists do drugs and alcohol most of the time because they’re afraid of life as well. 
        I never asked you to talk about your girlfriend , you decided to exploit her religion in most of your comments , so assume your statements ! I don’t give fuck if it bothers you. By the way , if you don’t like religion it is nonsense to be acquainted with a pure girl , isn’t it ? Likewise there is absolutely no reason an educated girl would accept to spend time with an atheist who certainly had sex before the age of 16 with many cheap prostitutes. Face the truth , you don’t deserve to live with a refined theist. 

      • Peter / Jul 9 2014 11:44 pm

        Religious people are less afraid of death now because they think tere going to some magical place when they die. they are terrified ofthe fact that there going to rott in the ground when they die. religious people do drugs and alcohol too. i find it hilarious how muslims forbid alcohol and cigarettes but cannibis and cocaine is ok. also even the pope drinks mate so your argument is again forfeit. i bought her up once to prove a point that religion or race means nothing to me. a lot of musims and catholicswould see her and think shes an abomination i seen her as a great young woman. also who said i had sex before i was 16 you wanker. i was actually still a virgin past 16 not that its any of your business. its illegal for a boy under 18 to sleep with a prostitute. also most jewish women wont date a man that isnt jewish which is extremely discriminate in my opinion. you really need to think before you message me stop commenting out of anger and hatred and think before you type. also she wasnt my girlfriend she was my fiance we were engaged you dumb arse.

      • Anneke / Jul 10 2014 6:57 am

        You should add that atheists see her-and all religious jews- as a stupid believer and a semitic girl who is not a true white. You say that it’s illegal to sleep with a prostitute under 18 but atheism condone illegal and immoral behavior isn’t it ? Is there scientific evidence acceptable for the atheist community that the law which forbid this is not an oppression. Why would you obey this law ? Why under 18 and not under 19 ? Since this law is not based on scientific values , tell us why you don’t dispute this law the same way you dispute faith. Hypocrite.

    • Anonymous / Jul 3 2014 5:47 pm

      LMAo
      seems your a racist prick too. what the fuck does being non white have to do with anything you racist retard.

  16. Kløstjn / Jun 16 2014 5:13 pm

    During the late European election last month , I heard some atheists who claimed that the Greeks should leave the European Union because science has proved that they’re in fact Christian Arabs. 

    • Virtual Finger / Jun 16 2014 9:27 pm

      According to many atheists , Alexander the Great was a Nordic young man because they think that great rulers can only be real white people. Of course , they have found scientific evidence to support this claim. 

  17. HAWHAWHAW / Jun 13 2014 5:50 pm

    Atheists are stupid assholes. CASE CLOSED!

    • Ian / Jun 15 2014 3:55 am

      As you are obviously a stupid arsehole of the highest order then we will defer to your greater experience!

      • Peter / Jun 15 2014 11:56 pm

        LOL
        Religious people are the most ignorant fools mate.
        They blindly believe without any form of proof. I like science because it provides the evidence. Only Science can prove Science wrong and Science proves Religion wrong all the time but Religion has never proven Science wrong. They are in fact very close to proving the big bang but religious people will never be able to prove theres a god.

      • Anonymous / Jun 16 2014 4:01 am

        What science ? I guess you refer to the biological experiments with the Jews , the handicapped , the Christian gypsies , the Jehovah Witnesseses in Germany or the Orthodoxes in Russia and the Muslims in the Soviet Union , the recent Uyghur castrations en masse in China to eradicate Islam….

      • Peter / Jun 16 2014 4:20 am

        everything we use in todays society is thanks to science. the computer and the internet we are using right now is due to science. explain to me what has religion ever given the world other than war? I am yet to see a atheist go out and systematically slaughter people because they have a difference of opinion. Religion is dead champ let science lead the future.

      • Anonymous / Jun 16 2014 5:01 am

        Lol , computers have inherited a lot from George Boole works who was a devoted Christian mathematician. Ask any software developer or mathematician , all computer scientists know him for sure. 

        The English mathematician and philosopher George Boole (1815-1864) was one of the first men, after the great Gottfried Leibniz, who believed that the human thinking is mastered by laws, which can be described by means of mathematic. Boole is the inventor of Boolean logic, which is the basis of modern digital computer logic, thus Boole is regarded in hindsight as a founder of the field of computer science.

         

        http://history-computer.com/ModernComputer/thinkers/Boole.html

        Some well-known Christian scientists who improved the world :
        – Hermann of Reichenau
        – Roger Bacon
        – William of Ockham
        – Giordano Bruno
        – Blaise Pascal
        – René Descartes
        – Isaac Newton
        – Francis Bacon
        – Luigi Galvani
        -Alessandro Volta
        – George Becquerel
        – Maria Gaetana Agnessi 
        – John Dalton
        – Michael Faraday
        – Louis Pasteur
        – Gregor Mendel

        Even Kepler and Galileo Galilei were Christians. 

      • Peter / Jun 16 2014 5:07 am

        Soudns like your in denial
        you live in a world created by science and yet still believe some high being actually exists
        yer ok mate
        all the proof is there thatreligion is a myth and yet your to stpid and to gullible too see it.
        instead of saying stupid shit like atheists are sub human and all that bullshit why don’t you actually prove us wrong.
        i guarantee you will be the first religious person to prove atheism wrong.

      • Ian Montgomery / Jun 16 2014 5:11 am

        the worst aspect of religion is they are all sure that their particular version is the ‘true one’. Syria and Iraq are good examples as was Northern Ireland.

          Ian Montgomery 4/4 Fox St Dandenong Vic Australia Mob +61 416981438 (within Aust)0416981438 Skype: globalmonty

      • Anonymous / Jun 16 2014 5:40 am

        the worst aspect of atheism is they are all sure that their particular version is the ‘true one’. nazism and communism are good examples as North Korea is.  
        Lol , your friend the atheist nazi Tom Metzger has proved that you atheists like peace and tolerance. Just read his comments. All atheists think the same.

      • Céline / Jun 19 2014 6:11 pm

        Hi idiot !
        Would you please read this excerpt :

        Ulster is not the only region in Europe to be torn apart by sectarian strife whose causes can be traced back several centuries. The conflict is not a religious war between Catholics and Protestants, but a conflict between two ethnic groups who inhabit the same territory but are estranged from each other by history, religion and culture. They go to different schools, attend different churches and live in different areas of the same towns and cities. Again and again the vast majority of Ulster people, on both sides of the divide, have voiced their demand for peace, but the politicians have not been able to reach compromise.

        http://www.uk.filo.pl/ireland_history.htm

      • Anonymous / Jun 16 2014 5:23 am

        Just learn history , idiot ! Stop having sex with your sister for a while , and learn history of science.
        George Boole is the father of computers , nothing to see with atheism because logic into compatible with atheism.

        One thing that was particularly striking in the biography is that Boole was clearly a deeply religious man. Des MacHale, Boole’s biographer, tells us that Boole’s mathematics and his religious beliefs are inseparable. There is even a suggestion that religion was the driving force of Boole’s mathematical work and the work on logic in that Boole may have been seeking to develop analytical tools that would help him get to the absolute truth and reality of all religions, something Boole termed ‘true religion’ or sometimes ‘pure religion’.

         

        Some atheist scientists :
        – Marquess of Sade ( the master of sadism )
        – Hitler (advocate of scientific atheism)
        – Stalin (soldier of class war)
        – Saddam Hussein (until 1991 who quickly converted to Islam just before Desert Storm to incite the Muslims to fight the US.)

      • Peter / Jun 16 2014 5:37 am

        how many times does it take to sink in
        stalin was a greek orthodox and adolf hitler was a catholic
        france has always had a very atheist presence in fact the french revolution was to break down catholicism in france and bring proper religious freedom into france.
        the people you name arn’t even atheist you moron
        however there have been hundreds of christian and islamic mass murders throughout history
        the most notorious mas murderer in history is funny enough
        your god
        80 billion deaths.

      • Anonymous / Jun 16 2014 5:50 am

        So now atheists are Orthodoxes , ah …ah
        Lol , you are so illiterate that I will let you play with your dick. 
        Tom Metzger your nazi friend admitted Hitler and the nazi are like you : atheists.
        Stop sucking his dick.

      • Peter / Jun 16 2014 6:00 am

        stalin was not an atheist you moron
        go and do some study on it
        i will except the fact that there have been some atheist mass murders but every religion has had them
        the thing is stalin was not an atheist he was a greek orthodox and just because be questioned religion doesnt make him an atheist. i have met a lot of christians that believe in god but oppose religion. more atheist were burned at the stake by chrsitians during history than atheists have ever killed.

      • Anonymous / Jun 16 2014 6:21 am

         During his time in power, Stalin had a complex relationship with religion. He officially adopted the Russian Communist Party’s stance on religion, claiming atheism and continuing the tradition of teaching atheism in schools and propagating the idea that religion was only damaging to a perfect communist society. Stalin even took it further than his predecessor, Lenin, and initiated a nationwide campaign to destroy churches and religious property and even persecute and kill church officials.3 It is said that under Stalin, the Russian Orthodox Church went from 50,000 to 500 open and operating churches.4

        Stalin once said:

        You know, they are fooling us, there is no God… all this talk about God is sheer nonsense.5

        But during World War II, Stalin eased up considerably on religion. He allowed for tens of thousands of Russian Orthodox churches to reopen, adopted an official policy of tolerance toward Muslims,6 and re-established the hierarchy of leadership in the Russian Orthodox Church.7 There were even rumors that Stalin had reconsidered his own personal relationship to religion when he took a “mysterious retreat” in 1941.8
        ( Stalin made a pact with the nazi atheists in 1939 , then in 1941 he finally needed the Christians to fight the nazis when the pact was broken by Hitler.)
        But for all accounts and purposes, Stalin was a hardcore atheist until the day he died. .

         

        I see you not only love dicks… You eat shit too.
        Bye idiot !  Die in hell !

      • Peter / Jun 16 2014 6:32 am

        that would just prove stalin was intelligent enough to see through the bullshit of religion. stalin was a highly intelligent man afterall but he still lived by his greek orthodox upbringing which rpoves atheists are intelligent but nothing else.

    • Anonymous / Jun 15 2014 1:30 pm

      Last week , I’ve heard a bunch of white atheists saying that Chinese scientists could soon change the scientific dogma about Evolution. They even openly admitted that they fear that real white people will soon be on the same level than the Jews and the Italians. They are even not regular far-right members , just a bunch of so-called leftist scientific humanists. They ended with a sarcastic “Heil Darwin!”.

    • Anonymous / Jun 15 2014 2:05 pm

      As China is the most atheistic country , there is no reason their scientists will not reverse the Evolution scale to support their stupid policy which condone child and sex slavery , concentration camps and so on.

      • Ian Montgomery / Jun 15 2014 11:33 pm

        And the Chinese atheists are worse than the ISIS religious idiots that slaughter people en masse. Maybe no better but certainly no worse .   Ian Montgomery 4/4 Fox St Dandenong Vic Australia Mob +61 416981438 (within Aust)0416981438 Skype: globalmonty

  18. Virtual finger / Mar 27 2014 8:50 am

    Hitler in his own words :

    « It’s said that every man needs a refuge where he can find consolation and help in unhappiness. I don’t believe it! If humanity follows that path, it’s solely a matter of tradition and habit. That’s a lesson, by the way, that can be drawn from the Bolshevik front. The Russians have no God, and that doesn’t prevent them from being able to face death.
    4
    We don’t want to educate anyone in atheism.

    •  Nightofiith-isth July 1941

    National Socialism and religion cannot exist together—No persecution of religions, let them wither of themselves— Bolshevism, the illegitimate child of Christianity—Origin of the Spartan gruel—The Latvian morons—Stalin, one of history’s most remarkable figures.
    When National Socialism has ruled long enough, it will no longer be possible to conceive of a form of life different from ours.
    In the long run, National Socialism and religion will no longer be able to exist together.

    → On a question from C. S., whether this antagonism might mean a war, the Fuehrer continued:

    No, it does not mean a war. The ideal solution would be to leave the religions to devour themselves, without persecutions. […]
    The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity’s illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew.
    »

     

    • Tom Metzger / Mar 30 2014 11:00 pm

      “National Socialist and Christian conceptions are incompatible. The Christian churches are build upon men’s ignorance; by contrast [National Socialism] rests upon scientific foundations. When we [National Socialists] speak of belief in God, we do not mean, like the naïve Christians and their spiritual exploiters, a man-like being sitting around somewhere in the universe. The force governed by natural law by which all these countless planets move in the universe, we call omnipotence or God. The assertion that this universal force can trouble itself about the destiny of each individual being, every smallest earthly bacillus, can be influenced by so-called prayers or other surprising things, depends upon a requisite dose of naivety or else upon shameless professional self-interest.”
      –Martin Bormann

      “We will have to deal with Christianity in a tougher way than hitherto. We must settle accounts with this Christianity, this greatest of plagues that could have happened to us in our history, which has weakened us in every conflict. If our generation does not do it then it would I think drag on for a long time. We must overcome it within ourselves.
      – Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler; Speech to top leaders of The SS, June 9, 1942 Berlin

      “The Führer spoke very derogatorily abut the arrogance of the higher and lower clergy. The insanity of the Christian doctrine of redemption really doesn’t fit at all into our time. The Führer cited a number of exceptionally drastic and in part even grotesque examples. Whereas the most learned and wisest scientists struggle for a whole lifetime to study but one of the mysterious laws of nature, a little country priest from Bavaria is in a position to decide this matter on the basis of his religious knowledge. One can regard such a disgusting performance only with disdain.”
      -The Goebbels Diaries

      • Virtual finger / Mar 31 2014 2:40 am

        Thanks Mr Metzger 

        Most of the the atheists I met are wolves in sheep’s clothing , as a Christian I do appreciate when one openly admits that National-Socialism is based on atheism. And I am quite sure you will not deny that you met many atheists who share your racist views in private discussions. 

  19. itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 3:38 pm

    My entire life it’s always been same fuckin story, 100% of all atheist countries are racist/nationalist, to date, not even one fuckin atheist commented in to oppose racism, they just came in to “make atheists look good” and try to get people to stop criticizing atheists for being racist, thereby allowing the racism to continue on and on.

    Just read the comments from normal atheists on this normal atheist blog site – http://www.atheistrev.com/2007/11/atheism-and-white-power.html . 100% of the comments are from normal racists/atheists who support racism andd White Nationalism, and to date not even one atheist commented in to oppose racism.

    It just shows you the type and kind of people that atheists are.

    I just dream that a day would come when a natural disaster comes and completely KILLS every single atheist off, not some atheists off, but every single one of them.

    Just look at how nasty and low-acting the supposedly non-racist atheists like Peter and Ian, all their responses were just made to make atheists look good.

    People who really disagree with racism don’t comment in to say “I’m such a great person and I’m not a racist and atheists are great people”, they comment in to acknowledge that racist atheists exist and oppose them, but an atheist has never commented like that before, not even once.

    That’s the type of people that they are, they care so much about getting people to stop criticizing racist atheists and making atheists look like great people.

    They are really selfish nasty people.

    I’m just hoping that a natural disaster comes and KILLS THEM ALL OFF, not some but ALL, every single one of them.

    Why can’t they answer my question? If you atheists really disagree with racism then why aren’t you opposing racism for instead of doing everything in your power to make atheists look good?

    Atheists are such nasty disgusting low-acting, almost 100% of the supposedly non-racist responses are something like “I’m such a great non-racist person, atheists aren’t racist, nothing can be considered as evidence that atheists are racist, only Theists are racist, [insert some personal attack here], I’m going to change the subject to claiming that only Theists are racist so I can get people to stop criticizing racist atheists”.

    Honestly, seriously, I’ve NEVER EVER met even one non-racist atheist in my entire life 100% of the atheists I’ve known are racist and there hasn’t been even one comment from an atheist in opposition to racism.

    Atheists are the nastiest, lowest, most disgusting racist form of life, I’ll never consider them to be partially human, but instead fully subhuman unless they come out to oppose racism like what they do on things like gay rights and abortion rights.

    On things like gay rights and abortion rights atheists don’t say “I’m such great person and I support gay rights and abortion rights” instead they come in to really speak up like they actually care.

    We know they really care on those issues, but on racism they just come in to say “that’s not considered as evidence that atheists are racist, atheists are great people, only Theists are racist”.

    People have to realize the truth: What the atheist worldview represents and stands for is nationalism, Nazism, and racism.

    If they disagreed with racism they could prove me wrong by coming out to authentically oppose racism like what they do on things like gay rights and abortion rights.

    No one has to ask atheists to speak up and voice their position on things like gay rights and abortion rights, you can tell that they really care.

    It’s NEVER happened, it NEVER will happen.

    What’s going to happen is the same thing that’s already happened in 100% of modern day atheist countries:
    – Opposition towards racism, nationalism, and Nazism will completely disappear
    – If you attempted to oppose racist atheists other supposedly non-racist atheists (like Peter and Ian) will do everything in their power to stop you, thereby allowing the racism to thrive and continue on

    We should really blame the supposedly non-racist atheists for all of the racism in 100% of all modern day atheist countries, they’re unwilling to oppose racism and they’re trying everything they can to stop people from opposing racism.

    If you’re an atheist, then you’re a subhuman being to me, like nothing, lower than a dog, a cat, a lizard, and other animals.

    The reason why 100% of all modern day atheist countries are racist is specifically because of the atheist population , it’s the ONLY reason.

    CASE CLOSED.

    • Ian / Mar 27 2014 6:11 pm

      I have worked who the racist is here IT IS YOU, you constantly bundle all athiests as being the same.

      • Anonymous / Mar 27 2014 6:25 pm

        Itsnobody is right : atheists are all the same hitlerian crap.

      • Ian / Mar 27 2014 6:44 pm

        Well as idiots go you seem to be beating us with experience!

      • Atheists are the genuine ambassadors of tolerance. / Mar 29 2014 2:05 am

        It’s well known that atheists like tolerance.  
        The USSR was the coolest kindergarten in the world ; everybody knows it. 
        It’s well known that Hitler was a very tolerant man and therefore was legitimate to denounce Christians’ intolerance. 

        « Christianity was the first creed in the world to exterminate its adversaries in the name of love. Its key-note is intolerance.
        👉 You’re not daydreaming , Hitler was denouncing the disgusting Christian intolerance , the same way any atheist do. The same way the the Soviets enslaved millions of human beings. 👈
        Without Christianity, we should not have had Islam. The Roman Empire, under Germanic influence, would have developed in the direction ofworld-domination, and humanity would not have extinguished fifteen centuries of civilisation at a single stroke.
        Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things.
        The result of the collapse of the Roman Empire was a night that lasted for centuries.

         

         Atheists are positively subhuman trash. 

      • Peter / Mar 29 2014 2:16 am

        itsnobody you are THE subhuman trash here. just shut the fuck up and stop talking you have proven what a bigot fuck wit you are. You need to get an education pr better still just hang yourself we don’t need fools like you in the world.

      • Lesson of atheistic tolerance with Dr. Hitler / Mar 29 2014 2:54 am

        Lol , stupid atheist ! I’m not itsnobody , I’m a nazi hunter who was just passing by. 
        Want to know more about Hitler famous intentions toward Christianity ?
        Read this !  

        « I don’t believe at all in the truth of certain mental pictures that many people have of the Roman emperors. I’m sure that Nero didn’t set fire to Rome. It was the Christian-Bolsheviks who did that, just as the Commune set fire to Paris in 1871 and the Communists set fire to the Reichstag in 1932.
        […] But Christianity is an invention of sick brains : one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery. A negro with his tabus is crushingly superior to the human being who seriously believes in Transubstantiation.
        I begin to lose all respect for humanity when I think that some people on our side, Ministers or generals, are capable of believing that we cannot triumph without the blessing of the Church. Such a notion is excusable in little children who have learnt nothing else.
        For thirty years the Germans tore each other to pieces simply in order to know whether or not they should take Communion in both kinds. There’s nothing lower than religious notions like that. From that point of view, one can envy the Japanese. They have a religion which is very simple and brings them into contact with nature. They’ve succeeded even in taking Christianity and turning it into a religion that’s less shocking to the intellect.»

      • Peter / Mar 29 2014 3:10 am

        there is nothing lower than a person that dedicates there life to a myth. you arnt a nazi hunter you sound more like you actually are one if your not itsnobody under a different account than im shocked and disgusted that theres an idiot thats exactly like him.

      • The apostles of perdition / Mar 29 2014 5:12 pm

        Glad you hate me decadent atheist. Who want to be liked by an atheist ?
        Atheism is like AIDS. No one died directly from AIDS , it destroy first the immune system to make people vulnerable to non-lethal diseases. 
        Likewise the atheists incite the kids to immoral behaviors In the hope they will die because of their perversions. Atheists have many. The first one is to make believe to innocent teens that compliance is synonymous with tolerance. 

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 12:15 am

        I dont hate anyone mate thats a religious trait.
        also teaching kids to do immoral things BAHAHAHAHA
        oh yes catholic priests are so moral and so chivalrous how did i go wrong.

      • @ Pete , the two-face bastard who hates no one / Mar 30 2014 1:08 am

        Clergymen who molested children always admit they have lost faith. That means they’re atheists like NAMBLA in the USA , the atheist organisation which promote pedophilia. 
        In Europe , we have some famous atheist politicians who promote pedophilia but are weirdly indeed very severe with priests on the way to atheism. 
        No atheists have yet denounced their perversion. What a surprise ?

        «In his 1975 book “Le Grand Bazar,” Cohn-Bendit justified pedophilia as a form of sexual liberation. “It’s happened to me several times that some children have opened my fly [Hosenlatz] and started to caress me.” […]
        Germany’s Green party is to launch an investigation into its active promotion in the 80s of paedophile groups who lobbied for the legalisation of sex with children. The party’s leadership has said it will commission an independent researcher to investigate “for how long and to what extent” such groups had an influence. The party’s chief whip, Jürgen Trittin, said the initiative aimed to take a close look at the “totally unacceptable demand” in the 80s that sex with children should be made legal. He admitted that the party had made wrong decisions about paedophilia.»

         

         When I was a teenager , a bunch of atheist schoolmates were talking in a locker room that they would like to rape a Christian virgin pupil to prove her that GOD does not exist. Few years later , the same argued that raping a black girl is not a crime. And I can still hear them saying that religions only brought intolerance in this world. 
        It’s rife to hear atheists speaking with malice and cruelty in private conversations. 
        (Just read the comments of the aryan atheists.)
        Since atheists have no moral values ,why would you be disgusted by child molestations or raping a virgin ?
        I guess you’re the same two-face bastard. 

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 1:22 am

        BAHAHAHAHA
        Again you fail mate
        Atheists have morals you wanker. I have morals and i am an atheist In fact I have more morals than most religious types and definitely have more morals than you. I am more intelligent than you, More moral than you and simply better than you.
        Said raping a black woman isn;t a crime? Any form of rape is a crime champ but immoral fools like you think that slavery is ok and thereore rape is ok so again your the immoral one. you sure they wern’t christian KKK because thats certainly something your christian KKK kin would do. You have lost every debate against me so far and yet you continue with your trolling rants. Just admit defeat and sit in the corner. Kids shouldn’t be on the net so get off and go and get a job at KFC like normal little kids do. You bible condomes slavery therefore you support slavry and therefore you support rape you are a pathetic sub human pile of shit.

      • Atheists hate slavery / Mar 30 2014 3:02 am

        Really ? Do you think you humbled me with your three-line speech filled with your “BAHAHAHAHA” ?

        Are you sure the KKK idiots are Christians ?
        Why do you think the KKK burns Christian crosses ? So check this :

        « Having been a Christian leader of a KKK group in California between 75-80 I will assure you that even though officially members are supposed to be Christians which in itself covers a lot of territory. I was a Catholic when I operated the Klan In California. A sizable number were not Christian but kept quiet about it. 

        After 80 I left the Klan and Christianity and have been a Free thinker ever since or Atheist. The growing numbers of White separatists in the U.S. and Europe are Agnostic Atheist or Heathen. We also have moved much more to the left. But not on the Race issue. »

         
        Everybody knows it , except you…

        The Bible incites the individuals to manumitting the slaves. But atheists are ignorant people , they don’t know that the slaves in the Bible were only war prisoners who were paid at the end of their term. Slavery existed long before Christianity ( Greeks and Romans in Europe were slave owners ) , and the Christian countries were first to abolish slavery as though the communists and the nazis restored slavery in their concentration camps decades later. Slavery still exists in North Korea , the most atheist country. 

        «“Within North Korea, forced labor is part of an established system of political repression,” says the State Department report. “The North Korean government is directly involved in subjecting its nationals to forced labor in prison camps. North Koreans do not have a choice in the work the government assigns them and are not free to change jobs at will. North Korea is estimated to hold between 100,000 and 200,000 prisoners in political prison camps in remote areas of the country.”
        Nor are those enslaved inside North Korea the only North Koreans subjected to forced servitude. The Pyongyang regime also earns money off the backs of citizens working for foreign regimes “with their movement and communications constantly under surveillance and restricted by the North Korean government.”
        The great difference between India and North Korea is that India acknowledges the problem and appears to be trying to do something about it. The country is so huge, so diffused, that the most well meaning officials and activists seem almost powerless.
        North Korea, with a population of about 25 million compared to India’s 1.2-plus billion, has no such excuse. Instead, officials stubbornly deny human rights issues. »

         

        As an atheist , you evdently don’t know that the Jews were slaves and freed by the hand of God , named Moses at this time. 

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 3:10 am

        BAHAHAHA
        oh im well aware of how your religious types try to justify it
        the thing is slavery is slavery and is immoral theres no excuse for it
        since the klan used the bible to justify raping, murdering and enslaving blacks I say that its clear atheists will always be more moral than you.

      • @ Pete the two-face bastard / Mar 30 2014 3:21 am

        Lol , why don’t you answer ? 
        Read the comments of your atheist comrades . They’re so racist that no one can believe that most KKK members are really Christians. 
        http://www.atheistrev.com/2007/11/atheism-and-white-power.html
        Just read the comment wrote by the hands of humanist atheist. 

      • Ian / Mar 30 2014 3:23 am

        Its nobody or more correct;y the ‘great racist’ has spoken!

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 3:37 am

        I read that link you sent me. You should read the comments some of them are quite true. There are white supremists everywhere mate. there are even black catholic white supremists. Again I dont think you know what racism is and you really should not cross racism with religion there are two very different things and it makes no sense. I can see what your trying to do but it just makes you more retarded. Your argument is that of a 16 year old child with no life experience and the more you debate the more it becomes obvious.

      • @ Pete the two-face bastard / Mar 30 2014 3:23 am

        By the way , I’m Black !

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 3:34 am

        Black and follow a book to justifies enslaving your people. BAHAHAHA
        you get more and more retarded
        Please mate this was funny for a while but its starting to get old. I dont think you even know what a racist is.

      • @ Pete the two-face bastard / Mar 30 2014 3:32 am

        In fact , I have a white parent , and some white atheist cousins who are all racist. Their racism is based on scientific racism as usual.

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 3:38 am

        Why are you mixing science with racism. You get more and more stupid. also Something is not racist if its fact so the best you can do is try to prove its not fact.

      • @ Pete the two-face bastard / Mar 30 2014 4:10 am

        You are evidently an idiot. The word racism is rooted in an anticlerical view -called polygenism- born in France in the mind of people like you. 
        I have never seen a racist word in the Bible , but most of the racial slurs I’ve heard came from the mouth of atheists. 
        In Europe , everybody knows a racist and everybody knows at least a dozen atheists. 
        Almost half my white cousins are atheists. They all pretend they are tolerant and rational , but they don’t want to acquaint with their non-white family members. 
        In real life , it’s hard to find an idiot like you who dares dispute these facts. 

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 4:19 am

        WOW I laugh so much when I get your messages that I all most pass out. The bible was written over 2000 years ago mate. Its full of lies, immorality and is basically just a load of shit made up to control weak minded fools like yourself. There is noone more racist than the christian and there is noone more barbaric than the muslim. Your white cousins are smart something you can never hope of being. A person that tries to mix religion with racism automatically loses any debate and is generally laughed at so I will just continue to laugh at you. What facts have you said exactly there only facts in your pathetic little teenage mind you can’t prove anything you have said please get mental help and stop wasting us good atheists time. The Bible is an element of racism its the model for the KKK and was used to justify enslaving your people in america. You have failed AGAIN it seems you just cant beat me.

      • @ Pete the two-face bastard / Mar 30 2014 4:33 am

        You evidently don’t laugh , you’re groaning because you are an ignorant morally challenged racist who only watch porns all-day long and have no culture. The fact that you support my racist cousins isn’t surprising : atheists always support Whites and especially racists. 
        And Muslims are far less cruel than North Korean atheists. 

        Beside , I’m not a native english speaker , but I can see that you have huge problems with your mother tongue , so I guess you have a good reason to have so few argument except BAHAHA !

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 4:39 am

        BAHAHAHAHAHA
        I have always had good morals I am in fact known for having good morals. Well I told you you don’t even seem to understand what racism is so you cousins probably arn’t racist there just speaking the obvious. The Syrian CIvil War is a muslim war and its known to be the cruelest war in modern human history most cruel since ww2. So again you fucked up einstein. As an Australian I speak perfect English in fact my language is closer to real english that most other countries. When you tried this one before I told you and will tell you again you just arn’t worth me wasting time spelling correctly.

      • @ Pete the two-face bastard / Mar 30 2014 5:04 am

        Most of my white female cousins are Christians and have good relations with me. My atheist male cousins are far right militants ; they hate more the Jews , the Gypsies and the Muslims than the Blacks ( there are not many Asians in Europe but they hate them too ) until very recently , but they clearly don’t like race-mixing. 
        Of course , as an atheist you will not admit that supporting a policy for a white Europe is racism. 

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 6:00 am

        lmao
        my ex fiance is very jewish. Also didn’t get together because of her rediculous religion forbidding her from not being able to get with non jews. dumbest fuckin thing i have ever heard and it helped enforce my atheism. The thing is she actually liked my views but couldn’t pass up what she was born and raised as. There are a lot of asians in europe and a lot of blacks please get a clue man its these rediculous comments that make you such a idiot

      • @ Pete , the illiterate / Mar 30 2014 3:10 pm

        Perhaps it’s because you only want to have sex that you couldn’t get together , uh ? 
        It’s well known that atheists hate religious girls because they don’t sleep at the very first night and they like faithfull boyfriend which atheists are not. I guess she is smart , and I agree with her , she did the good choice to break up with your incompatible lifestyle. Why don’t you just find an atheist girl with the same morality than yours ; one who are used to have sex in pub bathrooms or with half a rugby team in the same night.
        Evidently you have huge problems with your mother tongue : I have never said that there are not Blacks in Europe. Concerning the Asians , except in Britain there are not as many as in Australia , and very few in many European countries.  But as you are an illiterate two-face bastard , you probably think that the Germans and the Dutch are asian minorities. 

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 3:27 pm

        BAHAHAHA
        jews are not allowed to be with non jews period and I was engaged to her i wasnt just with her and there are some very slutty jewish girls as there are with every peoples. You have a very fucked up view on atheists even when atheists are generally more moral your religious pricks like yourself. Also religious women are just as slutty if not more slutty than non religious girls champ. Dont think that a christian girl is an angel cause I guarantee you a christian girl is probably the biggest slut in your town. I have quite taken a liking to you calling me a two faced bastard since of course you have lost in every aspect of our debate and you are the idiot the the problem here and its obvious you are the two faced idiot but keep it up kiddo Its always good comedy with you. You lost to an atheist mate I am surprised you haven’t killed yourself yet oh wait thats a sin even though religious pricks like you kill themselves everyday.

      • @ Pete , the decadent / Mar 30 2014 3:59 pm

        Having sex with half a rugby team in a pub bathroom is not compatible with religious teachings. Instead it is fully compatible with the atheists way of life who are drunk most of the time  , swear every three words , watch porns every day , and blaspheme every hour. Of course , you don’t know this. 
        Why then a religious person would like to be friend with such a decadent and immoral trash ? Nothing to see with sectarianism , bigotry or racism. It’s pure good sense.
        So why then do you want to be with a religious girl if you think that religious girls are so bad ? Lol ! Just find an atheist girl who are used to have sex with her father and her brother… There are many.  
        Marry your sister !

      • Peter / Mar 30 2014 4:05 pm

        So wrong sex and alcohol is and always has been a big part of catholic life. For example in Rome slavery, orgies and alcohol was a part of life. You really have no idea with how life works do you one day your balls will drop and you’ll see a girl sparks will fly and you’ll go on a date and probably get dumped but its the experience that counts right. You use all these words to describe us superior atheists and yet your to inferior to know what they even mean.

    • Tom Metzger / Mar 30 2014 11:03 pm

      Dont fight it .Just lay back and enjoy it! lol

  20. itsnobody / Feb 23 2014 1:28 pm

    Face the reality of the situation: Everything I’ve said is true, confirmed, and re-confirmed by the comments here.

    The bottom line is: Atheists never have and never will come out to oppose racism and other racist atheists.

    There still hasn’t been one comment from an atheist in all of this entire blog site acknowledging that racists atheists exist and opposing them, not even one.

    What’s going to happen once the atheist population goes up is:
    – There would be absolutely no opposition towards racism or nationalism
    – If you attempted to criticize or oppose racists atheists other supposedly non-racist atheists would come in to stop you
    – Racist atheists would be free to be as racist or nationalist as they want!

    It’s already happened in 100% of all modern day atheist countries (Denmark, Sweden, New Zealand, etc…).

    Swedes always have that nasty nationalist/racist/Nazi attitude, they are the nastiest people that exist in the world, plain disgusting.

    Here’s a regular atheist site, where a delusional atheist attempted to acknowledge that racist atheists exist (but didn’t oppose them, just merely changed the subject to claiming that Theists were racist) – http://www.atheistrev.com/2007/11/atheism-and-white-power.html

    And 100% of the comments from normal atheists on that blog post were from racist atheists who disagreed with the atheist author that most White Nationalists were Christian (LOL what a joke of a claim).

    Here are some the comments from atheists on that blog site (normal atheist site, not a racist site):

    I’m an atheist and a white nationalist. I believe the white race is more evolved than others such as the negroid. Parasitic races such as the jew are also failures of natural selection and must be eliminated. Stop stereotyping white nationalists. We are dedicated to our race not bullshit religions.

    Read more: http://www.atheistrev.com/2007/11/atheism-and-white-power.html#ixzz2uAha6SSy

    Sorry to break it to you brother but we beat the liberals by a mile when it comes to atheism and rational thought. George Lincoln Rockwell was a public atheist back in the 1960s.

    World Church of the Creator is virulantly anti-theist.

    The National Alliance has always been outspoken in their mockery of religion.

    White Aryan Resistance has always been atheist.

    Welcome to the party liberals; better late than never!

    Read more: http://www.atheistrev.com/2007/11/atheism-and-white-power.html#ixzz2uAfnRNWm

    Wow, you are very soft if Stromfront is too hard stuff for you. It is the most neutral place. You find VERY few republicans there, Biblebelt Neocons have NEVER been popular in the circles. They are even seen as bigger enemies than democrats! Stick around, once the shock and denial passes, you will follow the white rabbit too.

    Read more: http://www.atheistrev.com/2007/11/atheism-and-white-power.html#ixzz2uAfsfQ00

    On that blog site, not even one atheist came in to comment and oppose the other racist atheists, not one, re-confirming my hypothesis, AGAIN.

    So if atheists oppose racism (like some claim to here) then why after more than 6 years of that blog post being up didn’t even one atheist comment in opposition to racism?

    Remember, these are just NORMAL atheists.

    It just re-confirms my hypothesis that the atheist population directly causes there to be no opposition towards racism/nationalism, it’s causation, not correlation.

    I’m right, you fools (atheists) are wrong.

    The dream of living in a Whites-only type of society is finally coming back!

    The formula for a Whites-only type of society is: Socialism + a high atheist/agnostic/non-religious population.

    Socialism works to automatically stop immigration even without any anti-immigration laws and the high atheist population ensures absolutely no opposition towards nationalism/racism.

    It fits in perfectly with the liberal atheist platform (on fiscal and social issues):
    – Support socialist policies that automatically stop migration and immigration even without any anti-immigration laws
    – Support hate speech laws to stop people from criticizing racism
    – Support the belief in evolution and natural selection (viewing Martin Luther King Jr. as a dumb delusional creationist reverend trying to spread creationist propaganda)
    – Oppose Israel, view the Jews as the enemy

    White Nationalism/Nazism/racism fits in perfectly with EVERYTHING that liberal atheists support, EVERYTHING!

    A Karl Marx communist form of government works to stop multiculturalism automatically, you wouldn’t need any anti-immigration laws.

    It’s going to happen soon in the US once the liberal atheist population goes up (I predict once the atheist population goes up to around 25% in the US racism/nationalism would be more visible).

    We know that 100% of all modern day atheist countries are extremely racist/nationalist.

    Based on my hypothesis I predict that Australia, Canada, and The Netherlands are next up to become Nazi-ish/nationalist/racist (because of the atheist population).

    It’s causation, not correlation.

    Conclusion: The atheist population directly causes nationalism, Nazism, and White Nationalism to thrive.

    Conclusion: An integral part of the atheist worldview is Nazism/nationalism/racism.

    The atheist/racist future is almost here, I better figure out a solution quickly!

    • Tom Metzger / Feb 23 2014 5:43 pm

      Some people deserve to be murdered.its Natural. But religion promotes most mass murder traditionally

  21. itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 9:02 pm

    The case is closed, I already won all these debates and the atheists/subhumans rarely have anything constructive to say.

    Remember what I said, the atheist population directly causes opposition towards racism/nationalism to cease, nearly completely, which in turn causes societies to become racist/nationalist.

    Since my hypothesis is empirically testable we can predict which countries are up next to become racist/nationalist by looking at which have rising atheist populations: Australia, Canada, and The Netherlands

    An atheist world = a racist/nationalist world

    Just remember my predictions

    I have a dream, that one day a natural disaster comes and completely kills every single atheist that exists off.

    Seriously, honestly, I’ve never met even one non-racist or anti-racist atheist, ever.

    They are the worst people that exist, and should be viewed as fully subhuman as opposed to partially human.

    I don’t hope that some atheists die off by a natural disaster, but that all atheists die off by a natural disaster, every single of them.

    • Tom Metzger / Feb 21 2014 10:24 pm

      I am thrilled that as you say all Atheist’s are racist. 85% of all conflict comes from religion not tribalism.The rest is caused by predatory capitalism.

      • Ian / Feb 21 2014 10:32 pm

        Oh yeah you won cause God told you did she! What crap.

      • itsnobody / Feb 23 2014 11:59 am

        If that’s true then why do the most religious European countries have the lowest murder rates and why are the least religious countries in Europe the most corrupt with the most crime?

        You’ve been proven wrong, the issues going on in Cuba, North Korea, Estonia, and other atheist countries have nothing to do with religion.

        The most religious countries in Europe like Switzerland, Austria, Italy, etc…have extremely low near non-existent murder rates and crime.

        Latvia and Estonia (atheist European countries), and the other less religious European countries are crime-ridden.

  22. itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 7:59 pm

    Well the case is closed.

    People just have to face the truth: An integral part of the atheist worldview is Nazism, nationalism, and racism

    100% of the responses from atheists fit into these categories that I predicted:
    – Agreeing with or supporting racism/nationalism
    – Trying to make atheists look good and/or Theists look bad
    – Throwing personal attacks at me
    – Changing the subject

    None of the responses from atheists are like this:
    – Acknowledging that racist atheists exist and opposing racism

    Everything I’ve said remains unrefuted and true, 100% of all modern day atheist countries are extremely racist/nationalist beyond imagination, and not even one atheist is willing to oppose them.

    I’ve already proven that the atheist/agnostic/non-religious population directly causes racism/nationalism to rise simply because:
    – There are no mainstream Christian denominations that accept Nazism or White Nationalism

    So this by itself proves that a high atheist/agnostic/non-religious would directly cause opposition towards racism/nationalism to cease, since if there were no Churches the Nazis/nationalists/racists wouldn’t have to fight off anyone.

    Atheists aren’t even willing to oppose racism in the form of a comment.

    That’s what the atheist population directly causes: No opposition towards racism/nationalism.

    If atheists really disagreed with racism they would:
    – Think that it’s good that people are criticizing atheists for being racist if they wanted racism to end
    – Acknowledge that racist atheists exist and oppose them

    So why haven’t atheists done this for?

    There hasn’t been even one comment on all of this blog site from an atheist saying something like:
    “There really are racist atheists that exist, and I think it’s terrible, and I think racism is one of the worst things that exists, I really oppose it”

    That’s how someone who actually disagrees with racism would respond.

    So if you atheists really are in opposition to racism, then why the fuck hasn’t there been even one comment like that from an atheist?

    Please answer the question with your low-life atheist mouth.

    Instead their comments are like:
    – “I claim that I oppose racism and atheists aren’t racist”
    – “I’m such a great person and a non-racist, atheists are great people”
    – “Atheist are such great people and there aren’t any racist atheists”
    – “Only Theists are racists, the KKK, and some how the Nazis were Christian, and blah blah blah”
    – “Somehow evolution and believing that the brain is the mind doesn’t support ethnic discrimination”
    – “Nothing can ever be considered as evidence that any atheist country is racist, anything can be considered as evidence that a religious country is racist”
    – “Nothing can be considered as evidence that atheists are racist”
    – “I’m going to say something else to make atheists look good and/or Theists look bad”
    – “I’m going to try something else to stop people from criticizing racist atheists”

    Clearly we see that atheists are the most disgusting, low-acting, nastiest people that exist.

    They are the most disgusting form of life, always unwilling to oppose racism and racist atheists, always.

    Truthfully, in all of my entire life I’ve never met even one non-racist or anti-racist atheist, and I’ve known so many atheists.

    The reality of the situation is: There never will be any opposition towards racism or nationalism in the atheist community, NEVER.

    No opposition towards racism = A racist’s paradise!

    Just look at Sweden, the most celebrated liberal atheist country, Swedes are like the most disgusting people in the world they always say crap like “nationalism isn’t racism”, “Nazism isn’t racism”, “racial discrimination isn’t racism”, “We’re just trying to preserve our culture”, and other such crap when confronted with their disgusting ways, they are the lowest of all subhuman beings.

    Swedes are just like the worst most racist people that exist, and it’s ONLY because of the atheist population there.

    The supposedly non-racist atheists in Sweden would NEVER EVER open up their low-life atheist mouth and oppose racism and other racist Swedes.

    Basically 100% of Swedes are racist/nationalist, they’re just like the purest form of disgusting, disgusting people, low-acting, low-life, just like terrible people in general.

    Why can’t atheists answer this simple question: If you really disagree with racism then why the fuck don’t you oppose racist atheists and racism for?

    Why can’t atheists just answer that question for me?

    The only solution to end racism: View atheists as fully subhuman

  23. Ian / Feb 15 2014 5:06 am

    This guy is not very convincing at anything but name calling. I am an atheist -I do not believe in any deity but I am happy for people who need it to have a faith. What I dislike the most is that people of a faith get it hijacked and turned in to a religion. There are Roman catholics that I like and some that I don’t -it is their religion that i detest but not their faith. Same goes for Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists. It is only when faith gets hijacked to become a religion that we get books of rules that are open to interpretation or translation by whoever thinks they are better than the next one or who simply want to control others. To me a race is a group of people with similar features rather than common religion. All people have similar ways at time -when i lived in China i heard a West Indian going off his brain at an African American because he called him an Afro -American. “Afro I am, American -no way! you racist” is what he said.
    I consider that religions were first invented by small people to control large people so they didn’t get the shit bashed out of them.

    • itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 7:46 pm

      What does this have to do with anything I said shithead?

      Just an unrelated rant.

      100% of all modern day atheist countries are racist, and everything I said has remained unrefuted.

      • Tom Metzger / Feb 21 2014 10:26 pm

        Whats naturally wrong with being a racial separatist.Doe that cause you to loose sleep?

      • itsnobody / Feb 23 2014 12:15 pm

        Well it doesn’t really bother me that much, what really bothers is the dishonest racists and nationalists.

        I have less of a problem with the racist atheists who are honest than the supposedly non-racists who do everything they can to get people to stop criticizing racist atheists (thereby allowing the racism to thrive and continue on).

        If they could be honest about it I wouldn’t care as much and it would be easier everyone.

        If non-whites know not to visit or live in any White country and there’s a 0% non-white population in White countries this means that non-whites can’t experience any racism there since they wouldn’t be there, so it would be better than just lying and saying there’s no racism there and bringing in non-whites and torturing them with daily racism there.

        I’m trying to figure out a solution to this racist/atheist/nationalist population, but it looks like racism/nationalism is inevitable with a high atheist/agnostic/non-religious population.

        That’s what the atheist worldview represents, and that’s what the atheist future will be like.

      • Peter / Feb 21 2014 10:33 pm

        you don’t even know what an atheist or a racist even is

      • itsnobody / Feb 23 2014 12:25 pm

        You’re a disgusting low-life and your responses only allow the racism to continue.

        It’s the same crap response “there’s no such thing as a racist atheist”, “nothing can be considered as evidence that atheists are racist”, “atheists can’t be racist”, or some other response that makes people stop criticizing atheists for being racist.

        By stopping people from criticizing racism you’re just causing racism and nationalism to increase, thrive, and continue on.

        You gave me your definition of racism, and disproved yourself in the previous comments.

        You responded that way JUST because you want the racism in atheist countries to continue and thrive on and because you’re so concerned with “making atheists look good”.

        You’re a disgusting person, I hope that a natural disaster kills you off.

        Atheists like Peter ensure that racism and nationalism thrives in atheist countries.

      • Peter / Feb 23 2014 3:10 pm

        There is no racism. You don’t even know what an atheist is. anyways again thanks for proving what an ignorant fool you are and giving us all here a good laugh.

      • itsnobody / Mar 3 2014 12:42 am

        Yeah it’s the same shit response that I predicted, you’re just trying to get people to stop criticizing racist atheists JUST because you want the racism to continue.

        It’s the same shit “that’s not racism”, “there’s no racism”, “nothing can be considered as evidence that atheists are racists”, blah blah blah

        I just hope that a natural disaster KILLS you off

      • Ian / Mar 3 2014 2:30 am

        You are good at calling people names “shithead” eh! It is the first sign of a person that has no idea of how to mount an argument or judge the result. Most atheists are against religion and if the definition of racism has been convoluted to include that then yes we are proud to be racist in that sense. We are not against any race though whether that is Caucassian, Mongol or Negroid which is what true racism is supposed to be about.

      • Peter / Mar 3 2014 3:14 am

        His obviously only a teenage boy on his mummies laptop. His the most terrible debator I have ever debated with. I’m afraid “shithead” is kind of an immature insult something I may have called someone when I was 15. I doubt his has ever achieved anything in his life this is all so obvious his definitely not a college student and his definitely got an IQ a lot lower than 150. You can’t be atheist and be racist as you can’t be racist towards religion yet this idiot thinks religion and race are the same thing and so his obviously just a retard.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 3:33 pm

        Just lame personal attacks, my IQ is definitely above 150.

        I destroyed all your responses easily all you have are ad hominems.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 3:59 pm

        LMAO
        you have not destroyed a single comment. you have lost in every aspect so far. this is why i know your only a kid. Your iq might be 150 for a 13 year old but for a full grown man i doubt its even 100. btw shit head is such a teenage insult your so obviously a teenager.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 4:03 pm

        Except that being good at correctly answering IQ puzzles has little to do with if you use the term “shithead” dumbass, but you wouldn’t know though, you’re a stupid idiot.

        I’m not 13-years-old, my adult IQ is above 150.

        There’s lots of people who don’t use any vulgar language who have low IQs, answering IQ-puzzles doesn’t have much to do with if you use vulgar language. Because you’re so stupid you didn’t figure that out.

        Well at least you continue to re-confirm everything that I’ve said.

        Please stop speaking to me with your nasty low-life atheist attitude.

        You’re just a stupid person who throws ad hominems to change the subject.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 4:18 pm

        passing little kiddy quizzes or repeating the quiz until you get a decent score doesn’t count mate. How about you just stop speaking to anyone mate and go and kill yourself the world has enough retarded trolls on the net so why don’t you change your hobby and please finish school before you contact me again. also my son is smarter than you and his only 9.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 5:12 pm

        lol…I have a B.S. and I’m going for my Master’s (although I might not need it since my income is so high), but that doesn’t matter you’re just throwing pussy personal attacks because you suck and can’t refute any statement I made.

        I just hope that a natural disaster comes and KILLS off your kind with all the life in them gone.

        Truthfully, you’re the nastiest of all subhuman beings.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 5:17 pm

        BAHAHAHA
        Fantasy is a true childs fate. Your the nastiest non human i have ever met. Even if I was subhuman im still well above you. Just give it a rest mate who do you think you are fooling we all know your just a child. My kind are all over the world mate wherever there is religion there are atheists. basically an atheist is just a person that sees through the thousands of years of lies and contradictions and bullshit that religion has been. Aslong as there is religion humans will always be lower than animals as religion is simply a way of controlling people. So as a subhuman i am still way above you.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 5:25 pm

        All you can do is throw personal attacks because you suck and you lost.

        Your grammar sounds like you’re a child or you have a childhood IQ, like seriously.

        So far you haven’t refuted even one statement that I made.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 5:33 pm

        Truth be told you are simply not worth proper grammar. Your the one that started the personal attacks first all i have done in pointed out the obvious that your a dumb arse teenage child with no clue.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 6:02 pm

        I don’t think you’re worth any time since you’ve been proven wrong repeatedly by me on basically every point you made.

        Then the rest of your comments are just garbage personal attacks.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 6:12 pm

        If i was proven wrong in everything you have stated than how come is that that you have been wrong with everything you have said. I will say this one last time never bring racism into religion it always fucks you over. race and religion are two very different things. An atheist doesn’t believe in a deity thats it everything else is open slather (might want to go look that one up mate it might be a little hard for you to pronounce). You got on here told me a was basically sub human and an idiot and than you complain because I put you in your place and I’m the one insulting you? BAHAHAHAHA typical child non sense AGAIN. You know in a real debate I mean one where people arn’t actually just taking you as a joke you would suffer the worst loss in the history of loss mate.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 6:16 pm

        No stupid, I’ve already proven you wrong multiple times citing valid sources.

        Your response was just “I don’t need sources, I say so, and since I say so it’s true”.

        So using your reasoning we can say that anything is true, just say “no every source is wrong and I say so, it’s true ok, I say so”.

        You stupid idiot, you’re a complete moron, a dumbass.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 6:32 pm

        I don’t need sources because I have all ready learned the answer unlike you who has to do a google search and just gets it wrong anyways. Its funny though for SUCH an intelligent man your so stupid come off it kid get a clue.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 7:06 pm

        You don’t need to cite sources because you’re delusional, know you’re wrong, and enjoy living in fantasy.

        Using your reasoning anyone can claim that anything is true then say “I don’t need to cite sources and any source contradicting me is wrong”.

        So you’ve basically admitted that you’re a real stupid person who’s basically subhuman in terms of intelligence.

        Please stop talking to me since your comments are substance-less and just a waste.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 7:12 pm

        I never said that though now your just trying to change things around like a typical kid. I dont need sources because you have all ready proven that you have no idea what your talking about. for one you dont know me so what right have you got to say im a racist what right have you got to say atheists are racist thats like saying all muslims are terrorists or all christians are pedaphiles. thats just stupid mate and unless you are a fucking idiot you know that.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 7:19 pm

        Just shut up your once you stupid fool, you keep talking all this bullshit then when I prove you wrong with sources you just say “I don’t need sources”, wtf?

        I’ve already proven how the atheist population directly causes racism in my other comments I don’t feel like repeating myself you’re just so dense, dull, and stupid that you don’t understand.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 7:22 pm

        shut up your once? and you say i have bad grmmar BAHAHAHAHA
        Again another joke from you
        You haven’t proven anything to me or ian or any of the others on here we all still know your just some teenage boy talking shit on the net. I don’t have to show you sources because my info is right your info is from wiki and wiki is bullshit.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 7:29 pm

        It is seldom noted anywhere in fact, be it in textbooks or on the Internet, that Hitler studied the America’s Indian and slavery policy. He used it as a model for what he termed the final solution on the Jews. So, as bad as it sounds, could the Jewish Holocaust actually have it’s roots in the ‘colonization’ or takeover as it might be more accurately described, of the American Indian nation?

        Also read here

        http://www.nobeliefs.com/hitler.htm

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 3:31 pm

        Then answer this fuckin question: If you actually disagree with racism THEN WHY THE FUCK DON’T YOU OPPOSE RACISM FOR INSTEAD OF JUST TRYING TO MAKE ATHEISTS LOOK GOOD.

        It’s the same garbage, the supposedly non-racists atheists like you and Peter are doing everything in your power to get people to stop criticizing racist atheists, thereby allowing atheists to be as racist as they want.

        If someone really disagrees with racism their response wouldn’t be like your low-life response was “I’m such a great person and atheists aren’t racist” would it?

        Their response would be like “I think there really are racist atheists, and I think that racism is terrible”.

        Instead all the low-life atheist trash kind like you care about is MAKING ATHEISTS LOOK GOOD.

  24. TheScienceEnthusiast1130 / Feb 15 2014 4:11 am

    WTF?

  25. itsnobody / Jan 31 2014 11:33 pm

    People have to realize what the atheist worldview represents is: Nazism, racism, and White Nationalism.

    Back in 1988 no one in Sweden supported the Nazi or Nationalist party, it’s only in 2010 that they gained support.

    This is because before they were more religious, so they had lots of Churches opposing them.

    The racist party in Sweden, SD has had to fight off the Churches ( http://www.thelocal.se/20101005/29434 ) there.

    But with the atheist population so high it guarantees almost no opposition (the only remaining opposition is from the religious people).

    100% of atheist countries are racist beyond imagination (Denmark, New Zealand, Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Czech Republic, etc..), there are no exceptions.

    In the US, best state for Nazism/racism is probably Maine, this is because Maine is a liberal atheist state so no one there opposes racism/Nazism.

    New Zealanders are really like the worst people that exist in the entire world, they are the lowest. The only people who disagree are females or white-looking people.

    In New Zealand if they see a male Asian walking down the street they might throw trash at them, half-eaten hamburger meat, or ask them for directions.

    What a lot of New Zealanders do if they see a male Asian walking down the street is first politely say something “You know the directions to the airport? We’re just trying to find some fucking directions, can you help us please?”

    Then after the male Asian responds and answers they say something like “So why don’t you take your slit-eye there and head back to your own poor run down third world cardboard box Asian house you stupid Kung Po chicken smelling chink”.

    When confronted with this other White atheist New Zealanders respond with their low-life atheist mouth by saying things like “What’s the big deal? We’re just having fun and fucking joking” or something stupid like that.

    Here’s a YouTube news video about it – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkGpfTkcNw8

    I don’t even know how anyone can live being as terrible and low-acting of a person as New Zealanders are. Truthfully New Zealanders (along with Swedes, Danes, Latvians, Estonians, Czechs etc…) are the lowest of
    all subhuman beings
    .

    Then we have the worst of the worst, the lowest of the low – the Swedes.

    Sweden is so racist that they think that Eastern Europeans are actually African.
    Liberia, Siberia, Nigeria, Serbia, Croatians, Haitians, they think that they’re like the same.

    In Sweden people are Nazi-ish and throw rocks at Somalians, beat up Somalians, spit at Somalians, and in general just don’t like Somalians.

    They are terrible people.

    It’s the same or worse in 100% of atheist countries.

    If you’re reading this and you’re atheist, then truthfully if tomorrow a natural disaster killed you and you died off I would be happy.

    The reason why these countries and states are racist is JUST because they have high atheist/agnostic/non-religious populations, which guarantees almost no opposition towards White Nationalism or Nazism!

    It’s the ONLY reason that they are racist/nationalist, it’s JUST because of the atheists.

    That’s the ONLY reason.

    It’s a dream come true for the Nazis/atheists.

    The case is closed.

    I’ve already proven that the atheist population causes racism/nationalism to rise.

    The proof is simple:
    – There’s no mainstream Christian denomination that accepts White Nationalism or Nazism

    This proves that if there was no Christianity and/or Churches that there would be at least much less opposition towards White Nationalism and Nazism.

    Right now anti-immigration/Nazi/Nationalists have to fight off Churches, but if there weren’t any Churches they wouldn’t have to.

    So the atheist population directly causes there to be no opposition towards racism/Nazism/Nationalism.

    There’s hasn’t been even one comment from any atheist on this blog site or who’s Tweeted to me that’s come out to acknowledge that racist atheists exist and oppose them.

    If they really opposed racism their responses would be like:
    “I think there really are racist atheists that exist and that racism is a terrible immoral thing, I think it’s terrible and want racism to end”.

    But there hasn’t been even one comment from any atheist like that.

    Not even one.

    It just shows you the type of people that they are.

    Merely acknowledging that racist atheists exist is challenging and difficult for an atheist, they would never do it unless they add in something like “but there are also other racists” or “but I think Christians are more racist”.

    This is because atheists don’t have the intention of ending racism, they have the intention of “making atheists look good” so they add in things like “but there are also other racists” in order to make atheists look better. Adding in things like “but there are also other racists” is done just for the purpose of making atheists look better, that’s it.

    If they were to just say “there are racist atheists” it would much worse than saying “there are racist atheists and also racist other X”, it’s just added in to “make atheists look good”, the typical low-acting low-life attitude of the fools (atheists).

    That’s all that the atheist community is concerned with, making atheists look like good people.

    They can give one fuck about racism, they care so much about “making atheists look like good people”, that’s it. They are truthfully the worst people that exist.

    100% of the responses from atheists fit into these categories:
    – Agreeing with/supporting racism/nationalism
    – Trying to make atheists look good and/or Theists look bad

    There never has been and never will be any opposition towards racism from the atheist community.

    They hate the South, the Churches, the Christians, and support the liberal atheists on every issue.

    THE CASE IS CLOSED: Atheists will NEVER EVER EVER DARE come out to oppose racism, NEVER!

    We already know that in modern times 100% of atheist countries are extraordinarily racist/nationalist.
    My hypothesis is empirically testable so the next countries up are the rising atheist ones like Canada, Australia, and The Netherlands.

    In the US the states up next to be racist/nationalist are the rising liberal atheist ones like Maine, Minnesota, New England, Illinois, Michigan and other Northern liberal less religious states.

    The comments here from atheists further solidify everything that I said.

  26. itsnobody / Jan 21 2014 4:30 pm

    Yeah well I just want racism to end…but realistically as long as atheists exist it’ll always be prevalent, just like it is in 100% of all modern day atheist countries.

    What’s the main reason? It’s simple, atheists and the atheist community refuse to oppose racism and nationalism.

    So the atheist population directly causes opposition towards racism/nationalism to cease.

    Atheists as a whole are terrible people, I’ve never met any non-racist atheist, and so far there hasn’t been even one comment from an atheist acknowledging that racist atheists exist and opposing them.

    This is because atheists care so much about “making atheists look good”, they can care less about ending racism.

    If atheists really disagreed with racism their responses would be something like:
    “I think racism is terrible, and there really are racist atheists, and want to racism to end too”

    Instead their responses are like this:
    “I’m such a great person, I’m a non-racist, atheists aren’t racist”
    “There’s no causation, being an atheist doesn’t cause you to be racist”
    “Somehow evolution and believing that the brain is the mind doesn’t support ethnic discrimination”
    “You can’t be a racist and an atheist”
    “Atheists are such good people”
    “There are racist Christians”
    “Only Theists are racist”
    “Nothing can ever be considered as evidence that any atheist country is racist, but anything can be considered as evidence that a Theist country is racist”

    So we can clearly see from their responses what they care about is: “Making atheists look like good people”.

    The atheist community can care less about ending racism, they just care about their image and making people think that atheists are so good.

    On things like gay rights and abortion rights no one has to pressure the atheist community to voice their position, because they actually care to speak out on those issues.

    On racism/nationalism they’ve intentionally remained silent just because they strongly agree or don’t really disagree.

    By stopping people from criticizing racism/nationalism atheists are making things better and easier for racists.

    There are no mainstream Christian denominations that accept White Nationalism or Nazism, that’s the main reason why the Nationalists and Nazis hate the Christians.

    We can be nearly 100% certain that a high atheist population will directly cause opposition towards racism/nationalism to cease, nearly completely.

    It’s causation, not correlation. The racists won’t have to fight off the Churches or abandon all mainstream Christian denominations, because the Churches won’t be there, the opposition would be gone!

    People who don’t oppose racism/nationalism are on the side of racists/nationalists. A high atheist population guarantees no opposition, guarantees!

    So I’m just warning people, once the liberal atheist population in the US goes up to around 25% it’ll probably become as racist as New Zealand, then maybe as racist as Sweden or Denmark.

    Right now in the US many still don’t accept evolution.

    We can empirically test my hypothesis by looking at rising atheist countries that I predict are up next to be racist/nationalist: Australia, Canada, The Netherlands.

  27. Peter / Dec 12 2013 2:37 am

    Racism is the belief that a RACE is superior or inferior to another and therefore has nothing to do with religion. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BE RACIST TOWARDS RELIGION. Only a complete moron would call an atheist a racist based on his religious views since of course religion is a belief not a race so why don’t you retards learn the definition of racism before you comment.

    • itsnobody / Jan 21 2014 9:52 am

      It has to do with evolution dumbass, which tells us that certain ethnic groups are genetically superior or inferior in terms of intelligence.

      I never claimed that atheists were “racist towards religion”. I claimed that if you believed in evolution and that the brain is the mind you would have to believe that certain ethnic groups are more and less intelligent.

      You’re just an idiot, atheists seem to be subhuman in terms of intelligence.

      • Peter / Jan 21 2014 10:39 am

        hAS NOTHING TO DO WITH EVOLUTION MATE. rELIGION IS JUST A FANTASY THERE IS NOE VOLUTION INVOLVED. rELIGION IS NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE AND THEREFORE ATHEISTS ARE IN NO WAY RACIST. jUST BECAUSE i KNOW THERE IS NO GOD DOES NOT MAKE ME A RACIST IN ANY WAY.

      • itsnobody / Jan 21 2014 10:44 am

        What a complete idiot, it seems as if you don’t understand basic English.

        Most atheists believe in evolution and that the brain is the mind, which in turn causes people to become racist and ethnically discriminatory.

        I’m not saying being an atheist by itself causes you to be racist, I’m saying believing in evolution and that the brain is the mind does (which is usually associated with atheists and atheism), and also that the atheist population causes opposition towards racism/nationalism to cease.

        What do you mean it has nothing to do with evolution?

        Why can’t your atheist kind ever explain things or provide valid reasons?

        You just sound like a complete stupid idiot, just dumb.

      • Peter / Jan 21 2014 10:54 am

        Evolution isn’t a believe mate it is a solid fact. It has been proven for you to deny it makes you the idiot here. In fact so far you have proven that your intelligence makes you about as low as the scum of the bottom of a toilet. Nothing you say has any real integrity. How the hell does Evolution cause racism and racial discrimination when science has proven that racism technically doesn’t exist as all humans are 99.9% identical and that race is more of a way for people to identify themselves rather than actual indifference. Please stop talking mate your just going to lose this debate. thanks for the laugh.

      • itsnobody / Jan 21 2014 11:11 am

        What an idiot, you’re just using a straw man.

        Well at least you agreed that you view Martin Luther King Jr. as just another delusional creationist reverend trying to spread creationist propaganda.

        I think you might be the dumbest person I’ve ever spoken to.

        You’re using straw man, I didn’t deny evolution, I claimed that if you believe in evolution and that the brain is the mind then you have to be racist/ethnically discriminatory.

        I mean honestly, I probably understand evolution and natural selection much better than most Ph.D. biology students.

        “humans are 99.9% identical and that race is more of a way for people to identify themselves rather than actual indifference. Please stop talking mate your just going to lose this debate. thanks for the laugh.”

        What a complete idiot.

        The genetic distance between humans ethnic groups is greater than the genetic distance between dogs, wolves, and coyotes.

        “there is less mtDNA difference between dogs, wolves, and coyotes than there is between the various ethnic groups of human beings” (Coppinger, 1995).

        This proves what matters in reality is the significance of the gene changes, not the genetic distance.

        The greyhound breed is 99.9%+ genetically identical to other breeds, so using your reasoning this should mean that other dog breeds also would run at 99.9% the speed that the greyhound breed does, or close, but in reality it’s not so. Most dog breeds can’t run at 40-45 mph or anything close (only around 17 mph), even though genetically they are 99.9%+ genetically identical to the greyhound breed.

        Now for intelligence, it has to do with brain size and brain structure. It’s been proven that brain size is controlled by few genes which makes your genetic distance 99.9% identical crap irrelevant.

        Brain size studies published show brain sizes varying in human ethnic groups from 1212 cc – 1518 cc , the link to the brain size is the ethnic group (Smith and Beals (1990)).

        So if the brain is the mind, and it’s proven that different ethnic groups evolved to have different brain sizes how can they have the same intelligence?

        I predict that eventually in time society will accept evolution as opposed to the creationist delusion and move towards racism/nationalism.

        It’s already happened in 100% of all modern day atheist countries.

      • Peter / Jan 21 2014 11:27 am

        bahahahaha
        oh my god. thats not how genetics work. You and me are people most likely you are better than me at something. I for example am much more intelligent than you while you are probably better at cleaning toilets than I am. The difference between a black person and a white person is only 0.1% skin colour changes due to climate. Pretty well all domesticated dogs came from the wolf. keep going mate I was going to go to a comedy show this weekend but I think i’ll just use you for entertainment. I have never met someone that actually completely ignores solid evidence and narrow mindedly creates there own fantasy until i met you.

      • itsnobody / Jan 21 2014 11:59 am

        LOL!

        I guess comments like these let people know why I consider atheists to be subhuman in terms of intelligence!

        You smarter than me? What a joke, my IQ is above 150 I’d probably destroy you or any atheist on any test of any measure.

        ” The difference between a black person and a white person is only 0.1% skin colour changes due to climate”

        Just not true stupid, skin color is controlled by few genes and has little to do with intelligence, where as brain size is also controlled by few genes and has lots to do with intelligence!

        The average White male and the average black male do not have brain sizes differing by 0.1% (the genetic distance crap argument).

        You’re just truthfully the dumbest person I’ve ever encountered, just dumb.

        Go back to your own anti-science/atheist agreeing-contest sites please, you just sound like you’ve only had an elementary school level education, like seriously.

        There’s a reason why White atheists rank 12th in household income when compared to other Whites, lol.

      • Peter / Jan 21 2014 12:10 pm

        Again your a joke. For one you can’t tell when your being trolled and two you think atheists are racists and than you go and say about brain size and get that wrong too. All humans have the same size brain mate, neanderthals had a brain 20% larger than modern humans brain but its the density that actually matters whites have a brain 5% heavier than blacks so theoretically whites should be smarter. All DNA all genetic structure in humans has been proven to be 99.9% identical all though this does make us different its not enough to actually matter. Its ok to be wrong afterall your a bible dweller you don’t care about the hard evidence you only want to believe that you may actually have life after death which is utter bullshit. Humans evolved on Earth just like every other animal on earth. If you have an IQ of 150 than I must be fuckin Einstein because I have beaten you in everything so far.

      • itsnobody / Jan 21 2014 3:53 pm

        You’re just a complete idiot, there’s no point in debating with you.

        Brain size studies don’t show different ethnic groups to have the same brain size dumbass, I already cited a source, you cited nothing so far (Smith and Beals (1990)).

        But you are right that density matters as well, as well as brain structure.

        What do you mean 99.9% identical isn’t enough to make us different? Are you just dumb or willfully ignoring everything that I said?

        What matters in reality is the significance of the gene changes, not the genetic distance.

        I already gave an example with the greyhound breed, which is genetically 99.9%+ close to other dog breeds, yet can run around 20-30 mph faster than the average dog breed can.

        Biology and genetics shows us that very small gene changes have big effects in reality, even though they are very small changes.

        Since brain size has been proven to be controlled by few genes this makes the “genetic distance” crap argument irrelevant and wrong.

        You haven’t beaten me at anything, you’ve only shown that atheists are subhuman in terms of intelligence, it’s just like a waste of time to debate with you.

        I already how you’ll respond, you’ll make up a bunch of shit and not cite any source (like how I cited sources), and then just say you’re wrong I’m right.

      • Peter / Jan 21 2014 5:26 pm

        Everything I have stated can be found with a simple google search but your to stupid to think of that. I think what really happened here is that you really did think speaking out against a religion to be racist and than found out how fuckign stupid the thing you were saying actually was. With the brain size thing all humans have the same brain size mate. all human brain sizes are exactly the same but its not the actual size of the brain that matters otherwise neanderthals would be smarter than modern human. What really matters is the weight whites have a brain weight 5% heavier than blacks while east asians have a brain weight 2% heavier than whites and 7% heavier than blacks. It seems the only racist here is you so far. Aslong as there is religion there will always be racism and religionism and I think you have gotten racism mixed up with religionism because your a dumb arse kid.

      • itsnobody / Jan 31 2014 10:47 pm

        What a dumb fuck.

        Neanderthals probably were smarter than modern humans were, people think they were primitive, but most human civilizations were as primitive or more primitive than they were for hundreds of thousands of years.

        Your response just re-confirms what I’ve stated: Atheists will NEVER EVER come out to oppose racism, they’ll just agree with/support racism/nationalism and/or do everything they can to make atheists look good or Theists look bad.

        That’s it.

        100% of the responses here fit into those categories.

        If atheists disagree with racism then why the fuck don’t they come out to oppose racism instead of claiming to be great non-racist people for?

        It’s because atheists only care about making atheists look like good people, they can give one fuck about ending racism.

        I just hope that a natural disaster comes out and completely kills every atheist that exists off, they are the worst of all subhuman beings.

      • Peter / Jan 31 2014 11:39 pm

        I don’t think you even know what racism is. I specifically asked you how atheists were racist and you didn’t really have an answer. Don’t make accusations unless you have the proof to back it up. Every atheist I know and Myself included oppose racism and slavery which as it is religious people actually condome since of course the bible and the ko’ran both condome slavery and therefore religious people are and always will be sub human savages with no morals. So far you have lost in every aspect of this debate.

      • itsnobody / Feb 1 2014 1:21 am

        Blah blah it’s the same fuckin response that I predicted, just changing the subject to claiming that religious people are racist in order to make atheists look good.

        I already listed this out as prediction:
        “100% of the responses from atheists fit into these categories:
        – Agreeing with/supporting racism/nationalism
        – Trying to make atheists look good and/or Theists look bad

        Can you answer this fuckin question for me: If you and your other low-life atheist friends aren’t racist then WHY THE FUCK DON’T YOU OPPOSE RACISM FOR INSTEAD OF TRYING TO MAKE ATHEISTS LOOK GOOD?

        If you really disagreed with racism then with your low-life atheist mouth you would come out to acknowledge that racist atheists exist and oppose them not come out to say “I’m a great non-racist atheist and only Theists in the past were racist, atheists are great people” like you did.

        BTW you dumb fuck White Nationalists and Nazis oppose slavery because they want to live in a Whites-only type of society, they would never support bringing in lots of African immigrants just because some people want slaves.

        So if you oppose slavery then you’re on the same side as White Nationalists and Nazis.

        It’s just my dream that people like your kind get killed off by a natural disaster, always unwilling to oppose racism, just willing to “make atheists look good”.

      • Peter / Feb 1 2014 1:29 am

        I do oppose racism but everyone knows that races are different but that doesn’t mean races are superior or inferior to each other there just different. same are gender men and women are different but there not inferior or superior to each other. women can do things men can’t do and vis versa. the nazis were very racist and were roman catholic adolf hitler was a roman catholic and the kkk was/is christian. in fact i have never seen or heard of a racist atheist movement. in fact as i stated before buddhists are atheists and there far from racist or violent. your IQ is around 80 and i’d say your age is between 14 and 17 years of age. you just don’t seem to have the life experience foor your statements to have any integrity.

      • itsnobody / Feb 1 2014 1:50 am

        You’re just an idiot.

        My IQ is above 150, and I would most likely destroy you on any test of any measure.

        It doesn’t even seem like you know how to speak English.

        The Nazis were staunchly anti-Christian as any historian would tell you, the reason you didn’t know is because you’re gullible and since you’re anti-science you never question junk you read on atheist blog sites.

        LEARN BASIC HISTORY YOU DUMB FUCK!

        The Nazis were a racist anti-Christian/atheist movement.

        Martin Bormann was a prominent Nazi atheist official.

        In modern times Tom Metzger founder of the Neo-Nazi movement White Aryan Resistance is an atheist.

      • Peter / Feb 1 2014 1:52 am

        Your IQ is to low to know the difference between a catholic and a christian. catholicism and christianity are two different religions. also nazis were anti jewish and were roman catholic they were not christian they were catholic. the jokes on you kiddo but keep it up its so entertaining seeing a child trying to be intelligent.

      • itsnobody / Feb 1 2014 1:57 am

        What a joke, you accuse me of having a low IQ?

        You’re a subhuman being and a disgusting person.

        All you can do is mimic crap already debunked by the historical consensus.

        The historical consensus isn’t that the Nazis were Catholic dumbass, the consensus is that Nazism is either unrelated to or opposed to Christianity.

        Catholicism is a form of Christianity.

        You can keep willfully denying and ignoring the historical evidence and consensus with garbage from atheist blog sites, it’s a very popular thing to do in atheist/anti-science circles.

        You’re an idiot.

      • Peter / Feb 1 2014 2:08 am

        You there one that supports slavery and killing homosexuals. Your the one that believes in something on faith and not because of hard evidence and you call me sub human. wow mate humans are the bottom low mate humans don’t really deserve to exist humans are lower than cock roaches. we are supposed to be above animals but we are far from it we are a cruel barbaric and fanatic animal. animals only kill to survive while humans kill for pleasure, money or just for the fun it it. to be honest if god created humans than god is the biggest fuck up in existence. I mimic historical consensus when you mimic the bible when 95% of the bible and ko’ran is proven to be bullshit. also genius a don’t deny historical evidence your the one doing that here. there is no god mate prove me wrong. common prove atheists wrong or shut the fuck up. anti science? how exactly am i anti-science you retard. please kid just stop talking you have proven your an idiot stop listening to your daddies stories and go and find the truth for yourself. are you sure you are even old enough to be on the internet.

  28. Amanda Williams / Dec 11 2013 5:26 pm

    Athiest understand what it’s like to be the minority, we know what its like when your used as the scapegoat for every bad thing that happens in this country. We get it so it’s hard to judge other minorities after that. When it comes to white christians though sometimes you guys just dont understand. I mean what if you were banned from boyscouts, or from being a politician. How would you feel if you were not allowed to testify as a witness for a crime because you believed in something different. How would it feel to have your CHILDREN ripped away from you during a court case because the judge doesn’t think you understand the concept of morals based on the single fact that you have no god. How would it feel if you were to receive hate mail and death threats every week if you were to stand up for yourself. How would it feel to turn on the news and see your beliefs only added on when someone does come thing wrong. (ex: ATHEIST heroine addict. or ATHEIST shoots man). People say prisons are full of atheist… but did you know only .2% of criminals in prison are atheist? That means 99.8% are of other religions/ beliefs. There is so much hatred towards atheists and you have the audacity to ask us WHY were not standing up for other people who are discriminated? It’s simple. We have enough on our plates. We don’t need to defend them. They’re doing it on their own and they’re winning. We are not racist, we are not sexist, we are not cruel or unloving. atheism only means we put our trust in science instead of a deity.

    I love people, I feel emotions, I rarely judge and I am not a bad person. I am however an atheist. An atheist who volunteers, an atheist who puts others before herself because she isn’t cold hearted. I am an atheist who does not need a god to tell me what is right and what is wrong. I have never broken the law, I am not promiscuous, I have never drank alcohol or done any drugs. I rarely lie and when I do I feel guilty and usually apologize later. I hold open doors for people and hold fundraisers. I give my coats to people who are cold and help people up who fall down. I tutor those who do not understand certain subjects like English and Art History. I make artwork and jewelry in hopes that one day people will be able to wear and see my designs all over the world. So that when I’m dead my life didn’t mean nothing.

    Now tell me. Am I a bad person? Or is it you? The person on the other side of the computer typing up an article about people you don’t understand.

    How can you hate an atheist for believing in the atoms and the neanderthals (a relative to our homo sapian species) when we can see these things and study them. How can you hate us for compiling facts about our world into a huge study for us to find out that god probably doesn’t exist? How can you blame us for challenging the credibility of a book that had been rewritten hundreds to thousands of times.

    I don’t think you can hate us for that. You can only tell us to have faith and be frustrated because the only things you can say are lies and meaningless words.

    • itsnobody / Jan 21 2014 10:00 am

      lol, it’s just a bunch of garbage, another lame attempt “to make atheists look good”.

      Can you answer this fuckin question for me: Why the fuck don’t atheists open up their low-life atheist mouth and oppose racism for instead of just trying to make atheists look good and/or Theists look bad?

      I know the answer, it’s because they can give one fuck about ending racism, they care so much about making the atheist community look good.

      “People say prisons are full of atheist… but did you know only .2% of criminals in prison are atheist? That means 99.8% are of other religions/ beliefs.”
      – LOL! Did you know that Estonia is the most atheistic country in the world (more atheistic than every other country) and that Estonia has 0 Nobel prizes and consistently has the highest or one of the highest murder rates in Europe? Did you know that North Korea is an officially atheist state and that North Korea has the highest murder rate in East Asia?

      Mark my words, if tomorrow a natural disaster came and completely killed every single atheist off in the world with all the life in them gone I would be happy.

      It’s your low-life atheist kind that’s been causing the opposition towards racism to cease, people like you disgust me.

      If atheists want me to feel differently then why the fuck don’t they just come out to oppose racism for?

    • Virtual finger / Mar 27 2014 8:31 am

      The skinheads are a minority in most countries. Are they more tolerant ?
      Atheists are racist because they spread the polygenic and eugenic dogmas which induced the modern scientific racism. This is history ! This is their legacy ! Period.

    • Virtual finger / Mar 27 2014 8:36 am

      I mean to say : polygenism.

  29. David C. Harmer / Nov 27 2013 1:46 pm

    I think this is one of the funniest, dysfunctional articles I’ve read on the subject in a good while. The author seems to have no knowledge on what racism means for starters. I get the feeling that this person is probably a racist himself or herself. There is so much hate here. It sounds like they could use a little professional counseling.

  30. peter / Jul 6 2013 4:32 pm

    its impossible for an atheist to be racist because you can’t be racist towards religion.
    racism is the belief that a race is superior or inferior to another it has nothing to do with religion
    stop using words out of context.

    • itsnobody / Jan 21 2014 10:03 am

      Read my other response dumbass:
      “It has to do with evolution dumbass, which tells us that certain ethnic groups are genetically superior or inferior in terms of intelligence.

      I never claimed that atheists were “racist towards religion”. I claimed that if you believed in evolution and that the brain is the mind you would have to believe that certain ethnic groups are more and less intelligent.

      You’re just an idiot, atheists seem to be subhuman in terms of intelligence.”

      • Peter / Jan 31 2014 11:41 pm

        It states that races are genetically different not genetically inferior or superior. You double digit IQ is really starting to show now.

      • itsnobody / Feb 1 2014 1:16 am

        What a dumb fuck.

        There’s no difference between saying “you’re genetically specified to be more intelligent” vs. “you’re genetically superior in terms of intelligence”, it’s just semantics.

        My triple-digit IQ certainly shows, all you’ve shown is that you’re stupid as fuck.

      • Peter / Feb 1 2014 1:24 am

        You are too dumb to have an IQ over 100 mate seriously. For one the majority of the nazis were roman catholic and the majority of the ku klux klan were and still are christian. the ku klux klan justified slavery because the bible condomes it and slavery is the most immoral thing you can ever do. noone has the right to own another person. Also being different doesn’t make you inferior mate it just makes you different. Your to stupid to show how atheists are racist you don’t seem to have the answer. You know an atheist is just a person that doesn’t believe a god exists. Buddhists are atheists mate. Buddha was a real man that died around 350 BC he was the enlightened one supposably and founded buddhism and buddhists worship him in a form of honour not worship. So are you stating that buddhists are racism because they are atheist and don’t believe a god exists?

      • itsnobody / Feb 1 2014 1:35 am

        LOL!

        Just shows you’re uneducated gullible nature.

        IDK what your IQ is but you sound like a complete idiot.

        The same fuckin response I predicted, “trying to make atheists look good and/or Theists look bad” instead of opposing racism.

        The KKK is not accepted by any mainstream Christian denomination and composed of 5,000-8,000 members in a population of 311+ million, can you do basic math?

        LOL at the Nazis being Catholic or whatever…the historical consensus on Nazism is that Nazism is either unrelated to or opposed to Christianity.

        The junk on atheist blog sites about how the Nazis were pro-Christian, has been thoroughly debunked by historians.

        The basic reasoning on atheist/anti-science sites is that “somehow all the anti-Christian related Hitler quotes must be a hoax, but pro-Christian related Hitler quotes just can’t be hoaxes” LOL, I wonder why historians reject that laughable reasoning.

        Anti-science/atheist fans for instance claim that Martin Bormann’s table talk was a hoax, but historians looked at that claim by Carrier and thoroughly rejected it (Brog, David (2009). In Defense of Faith: The Judaeo-Christian Idea and the Struggle for Humanity. Encounter Books. p. 213., Hastings, Derek (2010). Catholicism and the Roots of Nazism: Religious Identity and National Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 251.),

        It’s still circulated in anti-science/atheist circles that Martin Bormann’s table talk is a hoax, but historians rejected that laughable claim and for good reasons.

        Bormann’s table talk published in 1952 is just as valid and credible as any other table talk published then.

        LEARN BASIC HISTORY!

        Here’s some starting points:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler%27s_Table_Talk

        Your points just show you stupid you are.

        I know a Buddhist he said that he hates atheists and that Buddhists aren’t atheists.

      • Peter / Feb 1 2014 1:50 am

        you believe in god on nothing but faith and you call me gullible bahahahaha come on mate get with the times. the KKK in its prime was indeed very christian and today its not recognised by christians because its not that popular these days for obvious reasons but back in its prime the KKK was indeed christian and used the bible to justify there bullshit. nazism is roman catholic NOT CHRISTIAN they are two different things. also why do you keep saying that atheism is bullshit when as it seems atheists have more hard evidence than religious people do. steven hawking has pretty well proven that the big bang is quite plausible and didn’t need god to set it off. go and read on on his views mate his far smarter than you or i will ever be. listen word of advice go learn what racism truly is before you go throwing the word around when you use a word you don’t know the meaning of it loses its meaning. also instead of talking shit prove it. in your next comment i was you too prove how atheists are racist don’t go using that bullshit that atheists are racist because they see races are inferior or superior to each other when atheists believe they are just different and thats an obvious truth. instead show up some real proof put up or shut the fuck up mate because so far you make you religious types like like gullible opinionated fantasizing idiots. also tell me something have you seen a unicorn lately and next time you see one can you catch him for me i always wanted one as a pet 😉 theres about as much chance a unicorn existing as there is a god champ.

      • itsnobody / Feb 1 2014 2:09 am

        Blah blah it’s same crap response that I predicted “trying to make atheists look good and/or Theists look bad”.

        The KKK is composed of 5,000-8,000 members in a population of 311+ million, they are also not accepted by any mainstream Christian denomination.

        You can talk about all this crap about the past, but I’m talking about in modern times.

        The rest of your rant is just changing the subject, you sound like a complete idiot.

        I believe that in the future I or someone else will scientifically prove the existence of God, but I don’t want to discuss that much on this article.

      • Peter / Feb 1 2014 2:14 am

        the kkk is small today but 90% of southern america was KKK in its prime. millions of americans would walk down the street in kk outfits. thats why america had a civil war because the confederates wanted slavery and the north didn’t having an ancestor from boston that fought against the confederacy I have studied on the american civil war and what started it. anyways listen your obviously a small boy so far you have not had the information to actual make your debate matter. I think in any real debate you would have started crying and would have ran out of the room by now but thats ok your only a child.

      • itsnobody / Feb 1 2014 2:20 am

        I’m not talking about the past, I’m talking about now.

        I think it’s true that there really are lots of racist Christians, but it’s also true that there are no mainstream Christian denominations that accept Nazism and White Nationalism.

        If you want racism to end, then why can’t you just acknowledge that racist atheists exist and oppose them instead of doing the lame “I’m such a great non-racist atheist person, only Theists are racist, atheists are such good people” routine?

        It just seems like you’re only concerned with making atheists look good and/or Theists look bad, that’s it.

        So it’s just as I predicted, once the atheist population goes up there will be absolutely NO OPPOSITION towards racism or Nazism.

        The supposedly non-racist atheists will remain silent in opposition to racism and/or try to stop people from criticizing racist atheists.

        If they aren’t willing to oppose racism now, they most likely never will. It’s something very easy to do that requires no effort.

      • Peter / Feb 1 2014 2:29 am

        Atheists fought against the nazis too mate. I am Australian and 18% of the aussie population is atheist and yet we are second in the world in HDI. I was born an anglican and realized pretty quickly how much of a load of shit it was. The way the KKK is is entirely irrelivant after all the KKK is basically dead today so it doesn;t matter but in its prime 1920 the american population was 106 million and 6 million were KKK and ofcourse there were millions that didn’t actively participate. Anyways my point is that show me how atheists are racist where in history have atheists ever been racist also the nazis are basically dead too. We have always gotten racism from religion. catholics had nazism, christians had KKK and muslims have taliban but where have atheists ever been racist. I am just a man trying to live my life as morally and best I can and if your god doesn’t like that than as far as i am concerned I am better than your god.

      • itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 7:40 pm

        Same shit response that I predicted: Trying to make atheists look good instead of coming out to oppose racism

        Face the reality of the situation dumbass: The Nazis hated Christianity and wanted to exterminate the Church

        The historical evidence is very clear

        The rest of your shit rants just has to do with exactly what I predicted: Just changing the subject to claiming that Theists are racist in order to get people to stop criticizing racists atheists and make atheists look better

        Why can’t you answer this fuckin question for: If you really disagree with racism then why the fuck don’t you come out to oppose racism and acknowledge that racist atheists exist for instead of just trying to make atheist look good and/or Theists look bad for?

        The answer is: You don’t disagree with racism, you disagree with people “trying to make atheists look bad”

        That’s it.

        Atheists are truthfully the nastiest, most disgusting, low-acting people I’ve met, ever.

      • Peter / Feb 21 2014 8:09 pm

        I oppose racism but there is simply no racism here to begin with. I don’t think you even know what racism is and you never predicted anything your a loser mate you have no idea what your talking about. I have read your other comments to other people and you are so stupid. Stalin was greek orthodox for most of his life by the way. You don’t seem to oppse racism mate in fact you seem to endorse it on here somehow I get the opinion you are a racist or your one of these retards that think you can be racist for speakking out against a religion.

      • itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 8:34 pm

        lol, what a joke.

        Same crap response: You’re just saying nothing can be considered as evidence that atheists are racist.

        So go ahead and answer this fuckin question for me: WHAT CAN BE CONSIDERED as evidence that atheists are racist?

        The atheist answer to that is nothing, nothing can be considered as evidence.

        I cited all types of evidence like peer-reviewed studies, atheists are just going to say “no nothing can be considered as evidence that atheists are racist”

        Stalin was an atheist dumbass, he grew up as a Christian and then became an atheist, why does that matter for? Lots of atheists grow up as Christian and then become atheist.

        Stop reading LOSER atheist blog site crap already thoroughly debunked by historians.

        You’re using the same strategy I predicted: Trying to get people to stop criticizing racist atheists JUST BECAUSE you want the racism to continue on and on.

        By claiming that nothing can be considered as evidence that atheists are racist you’re just helping out racist atheists, since this would make people stop criticizing racist atheists.

        Racist atheists are free to be racist as they want just because of the supposedly non-racist atheists coming in to claim that “nothing can be considered as evidence that they are racist”.

        Racist atheists can be as racist as they want, they have their atheist buddies coming in to stop people from criticizing them, always protecting them.

        By denying that racist atheists exist you’re helping out racist atheists, and causing racism to grow and continue.

        Face reality: Everything I predicted is true.

      • Peter / Feb 21 2014 8:46 pm

        BAHAHAHA
        Ok I get it your just trolling. You can’t possibly be even remotely serious with anything you say. A racist is a belief that a race is inferior or superior to another it has nothing to do with religion AT ALL. Also the only idiot in this chat is you. Will you just shut the fuck up. Also for a little extra giggle why don’t you ring up that atheist experience show so we can all watch you make a fuck wit of yourself infront of millions of people.

      • itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 8:49 pm

        Ok….so still you haven’t refuted any statement and you’ve still intentionally refused to oppose racism.

        You’re a loser, and you’ve thoroughly lost the debate.

        I explained already in high detail how evolution supports the belief that certain ethnic groups are genetically superior in terms of intelligence.

        I don’t feel like repeating myself.

        So why haven’t you answered the question: Why don’t atheists oppose racism and racist atheists for?

        You haven’t, you just claimed to oppose to make atheists look good.

      • Peter / Feb 21 2014 9:04 pm

        BAHAHAHA
        You lost this debate the moment you stated that atheists are racist. Just for a little extra giggle explain to me what an atheist is. You explained thats cientists believe that races have inferiorities and superiorities to each other and all of this is all ready known by anyone capable of rational thought. the thing is that we are all still equal. Anyways explain to me what an atheist is

      • itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 9:08 pm

        You’re dumb, you’re stupid.

        Please don’t speak to me anymore.

        You just said we’re all equal but races are superior and inferior, and ” A racist is a belief that a race is inferior or superior to another”

        So you disproved your own statements.

        You proved yourself wrong.

        You’re an idiot.

      • Peter / Feb 21 2014 9:31 pm

        How did I. As i have explained to you before each race is different. they are all unique and therefore are superior to each other in different ways so therefore at the end of the day they are pretty well equal. You still haven’t told me what you think an atheist is yet but again mate thanks for the laugh. You are one of the dumbest people I have ever debated with. Heres two things you were wrong about stalin was raised a greek orthodox he was not an atheist until much later when he realized what a load of crap religion is and also north korea is primarily buddhist they are not an atheist state.

      • itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 10:00 pm

        You’re dumb, you’re stupid, truthfully I think the VERY stupidest atheist I’ve spoken to.

        Claiming to oppose racism ISN’T the same as actually opposing racism, you’ve never opposed racism or racist atheists before.

        Why does it matter that Stalin was raised as a Christian for? He was an atheist when he was killing millions shithead.

        North Korea is an officially atheist state, here are sources indicating so:
        – World and Its Peoples: Eastern and Southern Asia. Marshall Cavendish. Retrieved 2011-03-05. “North Korea is officially an atheist state in which almost the entire population is nonreligious.”
        – The State of Religion Atlas. Simon & Schuster. Retrieved 2011-03-05. “Atheism continues to be the official position of the governments of China, North Korea and Cuba.”

        So shut your stupid low-life atheist mouth up for once.

        You’ve been proven wrong repeatedly and you’re just a stupid person.

        In the whole fuckin world not even one fuckin atheist is willing to oppose other racist/atheist countries, not one.

      • Peter / Feb 21 2014 10:12 pm

        Everything you say is wrong and you don’t seem to know what an atheist is for the third time what is an atheist and also what religion are you. You know you have a big mouth for a small child using his mummies laptop.

      • itsnobody / Feb 23 2014 11:54 am

        What an idiot, you’ve been repeatedly shown to be wrong and you are just a sore loser.

        Everything I said is 100% accurate and correct.

        Your atheist kind is part of the problem because you intentionally refuse to oppose racism, and just work to cause racism to continue on and on.

        What’s going to happen once the atheist population goes up to nearly 100% is:
        – There would be absolutely no opposition towards racism or nationalism
        – If you attempted to criticize or oppose racists atheists other supposedly non-racist atheists would come in to stop you
        – Racist atheists would be free to be as racist or nationalist as they want!

        It’s already happened in 100% of all modern day atheist countries.

        It’s because of people like you that racism and nationalism thrives in 100% of atheist countries.

      • Peter / Feb 23 2014 3:13 pm

        Bahahaha
        correct only in your pathetic little child mind maybe.
        again thanks for the laugh and i think the world is better without you in it so please do us all a favour and hang yourself. film it and put it on live leak than we’ll all know the world has once less idiot. you have lost this debate as you have no answers everything you have said has been wrong.

      • itsnobody / Mar 3 2014 12:43 am

        Same BS crap…well at least you continue to re-confirm everything that I said.

        The supposedly the non-racist atheists like Peter will do everything in their power to stop people from criticizing racist atheists, thereby allowing atheists to be as racist as they want.

        You’re a disgusting person and a low life, I really sincerely hope that you die off by a natural disaster

      • Peter / Mar 3 2014 12:48 am

        Actually Im not trying to do anything other than get through to you how wrong you are. I understand your some teenage kid you get an idea and than stick by it like some arrogant little prick. typical teenager i guess.

      • itsnobody / Mar 3 2014 12:50 am

        Well you’re an idiot, I’m not a teenager and my income is very high now (just 1 year after college).

        You’ve re-confirmed everything that I said and you still intentionally refuse to acknowledge that racist atheists exist and oppose them, instead you’re just doing everything you can to stop people from criticizing racist atheists, thereby allowing racist atheists to be as racist as they want.

        All this crap about how “you don’t know what racism is”, “atheists are such great non-racist people”, and blah blah it really works to help out racist atheists and allow the racism to thrive on.

        You haven’t shown anything, except that you’re an idiot.

      • Peter / Mar 3 2014 12:58 am

        Of course racist atheists exist but theres also racist muslims, christians, catholics, jews. to think that just because a person doesn’t believe in a deity that his racist is extremely stupid. I am not racist nor are the atheists I know however there are many christian racists around here. You seem extremely uneducated for a college boy not that education is that great in america to start with. don’t bring religion into race mate thats the dumbest thing a person can ever do. I don’t believe in the existence of a god that does not make me racist in any way.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 3:28 pm

        It’s the same garbage response that I already predicted, “just trying to make atheists look good”, you accomplished this by adding in “theres also racist muslims, christians, catholics, jew” because your goal wasn’t to oppose racism, it was to make atheists look good.

        Answer this fuckin question: If you actually disagree with racism then why the fuck don’t you oppose racism for INSTEAD OF JUST TRYING TO MAKE ATHEISTS LOOK GOOD.

        I just dream that people like would you die off.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 4:01 pm

        Im not trying to make atheists look good you imbecile i am just stating the obvious that you are wrong.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 4:04 pm

        lol….you’re not trying to make atheists look good yet nearly 100% of your comments are about making atheists look good.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 4:16 pm

        all your comments is about making religious people look good. I get it your a kid and your trolling on your mummies laptop but you need to give it up. You were fun at first gave me a good laugh and it was quite entertaining much like an onstage comedian making an idiot of himself but now its just getting old.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 5:10 pm

        No it hasn’t, I just state the truth, which in this case happens to make religion look good.

        The truth is there is no mainstream Christian denomination that accepts White Nationalism or Nazism, why don’t you ask normal White Nationalists what they think of Christianity?

        You’re just throwing lame ad hominems because you suck.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 5:21 pm

        Religion can never be good and nothing you have said is even remotely correct. the Nazi’s were catholic you numb skull. A white nationalist? bahahaha neo-nazis in america ARE christian. See again you have made an idiot of yourself. it seems to me your one of these kids that can’t make his mind up your not sure if you should believe in a deity or not and so you lush out in anger and talk a whole load of bullshit liek your doing here. don’t worry your a teenager it will pass and you’ll actually grow a brain and realize what a fucking idiot you are.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 5:30 pm

        You’re just plain wrong and changing the subject stupid.

        The Nazis weren’t Catholic and the junk on atheist blog sites has been thoroughly debunked by historians.

        Which historical source supports your delusions?

        The historical consensus on Nazism and Christianity is that “Nazism is either unrelated to or opposed to Christianity”.

        The most prominent Nazi officials like Heinrich Himmler, Martin Bormann, and Alfred Rosenberg were all staunchly anti-Christian.

        Instead of reading only garbage on atheist blog sites, why not learn basic history, here’s some starting points:
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Nazi_Germany
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler%27s_Table_Talk

        All atheists have in response to all the overwhelming historical evidence clearly debunking their nonsense (non-science) is “no it just can’t be, some how the atheist blog sites I read are correct”.

        Modern day Nazis as well as the Nazis in the past confirm the historical consensus on Nazism and religion.

        In the US Tom Metzger founder of the Neo-Nazi group “White Aryan Resistance” is an atheist.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 5:35 pm

        Nazi’s were catholic germany was a catholic country. hitler was raised a catholic and followed catholic maroles his entire life. Also muslims are anti christian so what does anti christian have to do with atheists exactly? Im not anti christian I just find it a load of bullshit like all religion.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 5:54 pm

        Which historical source supports your delusions dumbass? Why don’t you cite something?

        The Nazis were certainly never Catholic, and hated the Church, especially the Catholic Church which was one of their biggest enemies.

        There’s one historian Steigmann-Gall that argues that the Nazis were somehow pro-Christian, but he admits that he “argues against the consensus that Nazism as a whole was either unrelated to Christianity or actively opposed to it” (Steigmann-Gall, Richard (2003). The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. abstract. ISBN 0521823714.).

        Almost every other independent historical source clearly indicates that the Nazis (including Hitler) were staunchly anti-Christian.

        Joseph Goebbels, who is considered to be the very very closest person to Hitler said “He [Hitler] hates Christianity, because it has crippled all that is noble in humanity.” (Fred Taylor Translation; The Goebbels Diaries 1939-41; Hamish Hamilton Ltd; London; 1982).

        Multiple unrelated sources like Goebbels, Albert Speer, Martin Bormann, and others confirm that the quotes are indeed accurate.

        It’s been widely circulated on atheist blog sites that somehow every anti-Christian quote is a hoax, but historians rejected that hypothesis already.

        I already know your stupid response “I don’t have to cite any sources I read garbage from atheist blog sites”.

        So you’ve been proven wrong!

        Checkmate!

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 6:06 pm

        LMAO christians and catholics arn’t the same in fact I have met a lot of anti christian catholics. Being raised an anglican I was always towards being anti catholic even though of course its all the same delusional bullshit at the end of the day. I don’t need to look up any atheist sources mate but you obviously have to I get it you go googling for info before you respond the problem is that google has many mixed sources and thats why you fucked up again.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 6:15 pm

        You’re just a stupid person, an idiot.

        Catholicism is a form of Christianity according to every source dumbass.

        Go ahead AND CITE A FUCKIN HISTORICAL SOURCE SUPPORTING YOUR DELUSIONS.

        You don’t need historical sources because you’re stupid and ignorant, lol.

        So you’ve basically admitted that you’re wrong by saying you don’t need to cite any sources, what an idiot.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 6:30 pm

        Still going on?
        I have done my research perhaps you should aswell. than you might actually get an iq about 80

      • Ian / Feb 21 2014 10:01 pm

        You talk about logic. Who created God. Logic says something did. Alright I will will go along with your likely argument that no one needed to create God. Then why did we need a God to create us. To put it simply – if God didn’t need to be created why did we?

      • itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 10:07 pm

        Oh you’re just changing the subject, but I’ll reply anyway.

        God is causeless and has no cause, and requires no cause.

        In science physicists believe that energy is causeless, do you have a problem with science claiming that energy requires no cause and just always existed?

        If not then you’re saying you have no problem with excepting that things can be causeless, which makes your argument invalid.

        I don’t know what you mean by “why did God need to create us?” such a question has no connection to whether or not God actually exists.

  31. jared / Jun 4 2013 1:59 am

    I think this article is pretty mean and sancitmonious. And I have a question for you: what if it was true? WHAT IF it was true that x genetic group was less intelligent than another? Sociologist whinging about racism and equality wouldn’t change that in the least. Real, actual scientists get a little annoyed when anyone tells them Something can’t be true because it would run counter to their beleifs. Women have less muscle masscthan men do. What are you going to do, call developmental biologists sexist for claiming men and women aren’t 100% equal in all things?
    Now, as it happens, we DONT know everything about human intelligence. And its much mor. li. likely that X CULTURE would turn out to b e less
    good at generating intelligent people than Y culture. (Say, urban poverty culture

    • jared / Jun 4 2013 2:09 am

      Damn it, my phone is being awkward. Excuse the poor typing.

      -for example, poverty culture. And since lots of black people are poor and urban, well you get the point. White/hispanic/whatever people can engage in the same dumb gangbanger behavior; its not genetically programmed or something.

      Dawkins is a 60something year-old man who has no patience forcthe latest in postmodern humanistic studies, because he does(did) real science in the field of genetics, and genes are important. And you deciding that genetics conflict with your philosophy isn’t going to make the nasty fascist genes dissapear in a puff of checked privelige.

  32. jolie / Apr 4 2013 2:15 pm

    I’d like to add, without bothering to read any of the posts below, of course, that perhaps there are a number of people who identify as atheist who are ardently working for anti-racism and frankly don’t believe the question of whether or not God exists to be of enough consequence to bother prattling about it in public arenas for money as they’re busy actually *doing something about racism* … people like Dawkins and Harris have just figured out how to make the racists feel vindicated in their racism by falling back on “scientific evidence” (which can always and is always read in multiple ways – there is no Truth – capital T – after all) and how to make money, lot’s of it, from these deep-seeded fears and hatreds. And atheists aren’t alone – i’ve also witnessed the same predilection amongst (some few) Christians, as well. It’s more of a universal than really a problem of atheists, per se…

    • Yves / Apr 4 2013 10:08 pm

      The point is that atheism is based on scientific racism.
      Scientific racism is the logical deduction of atheistic viewpoints.
      Just like the nazis did, they classify humanity according to inferior/superior races for scientific and political purposes…not based on religious belief.
      It is not a biblical acceptance. No race classification is mentioned or can be deduced from any biblical verses. Only corrupted people can and did pervert the Bible words contrarily to atheism which explicitly is the pedestal of white privileges.
      Atheists who pretend to fight racism are ALL hypocrit.

      • Anonymous / Apr 8 2013 4:06 pm

        So True, very well said.

    • Yves / Apr 4 2013 11:10 pm

      And , American Atheist Larry Darby is exactly the same type of atheist we have in Europe : racist , nationalist , chauvinist …degenerated !
      The atheists true face.

  33. Thatoneguy / Feb 28 2013 12:06 am

    I like how the guy hating on atheists is probably the most vicious guy posting, and all the atheists are trying to be polite and tactful. Ironic in a way… Oh well

    • Anonymous / Feb 28 2013 5:01 am

      Lol , atheist are always rude.

      • Thatoneguy / Feb 28 2013 9:21 am

        Not rude, true. It’s your religious friend calling atheists “sub human” and “racist”, but all the atheists I know aren’t racist, plus, at least half of them are non-white themselves. And last time I checked, I’m pretty sure we’re all humans…

    • Yves / Mar 1 2013 2:40 am

         Thatoneguy, 
      here is the crude truth you sure know but don’t like it to be told. 
      I will acquaint you with some facts in the Christian most polite manner :
       

      I have biracial roots and my white friends are all Christians or believers. 
      I met very few non-white agnostics ( it seems that most of them are not liked much by atheists ) ; they are very isolated because they don’t have much white unbeliever friends. 
      Instead , in Western Europe churches are very multiethnic in urban areas whereas in rural areas ( in France for instance  ) , the only black person in a rural church is often the newly young priest who just came from Africa (to learn more about the way Europeans live their faith and to surrogate old priests) . 
      Although I used to have white atheist classmates and colleagues who pretends to be humanists. They’re so clumsy in doing the Good and so experienced in the Bad that it wasn’t uneasy to predict they are implicit racist   .
      However, some finally became some sort of friends during months… but we are not anymore. 
      Why then ? Because when I went to play , watch films or eat at their place, I discovered what they try to hide.
      For example , they always say very racist comments each time a non-white appears on TV. They all just could not stop saying racial slurs during more then an hour long .
      They were less racist with me because they cynically say that I’m almost like them  …as long as I never mention my faith in God , nevertheless, they still pretend to be humanist persons. 
      As they implicitly support some well-known anticlerical racists ( who still have streets and schools at their name because european anticlerical governments supported during decades the scientific racism propaganda )  , I was not quite surprised when I discovered that they have racist discs , books or posters in their bedroom. 
       
      They rarely publicly support the atheist scientific racist legacy ,  but behind the close doors… 
      For instance, european atheists are secretly very unhappy of the re-election of Obama. It is well-known that they preferred to see a faithful white Mormon than a black president running a western country.
      I can tell for what I’ve heard, atheists hate less Jesus white disciples than non-white people… Also, they prefer white Christian countries than Asian atheists regimes such as North Korea. 
      That’s not surprising to read that former KKK members have revealed that most of them are in fact real atheists and it is the same in supremacist movements all over Europe… This is undisputed !
       
      Atheism is just usurpation.

       
      If an atheist try to be a nice person for a short while , it is so unnatural that one almost laugh ; they’re so clumsy !
      Atheists are so inexperienced in moral things. 
       
       
       
       
      As you can see, it is very uncomfortable for a non-white person to be acquainted with white atheists. 
       

       

  34. Yves / Feb 23 2013 6:47 pm

    In response to some comments (especially Tim Williams ones ) :
     
    According to Bill James, atheist Richard Dawkins fails to prove that Hitler was a Christian.
    Godwin’s Law states that anyone who resorts to associating their opponent with Hitler and the Nazis automatically loses the argument. If the smear tactics of Dawkins et al. don’t actually fall foul of this law, they come pretty close.
     

     
    Hitler proposed a “final solution” for Christianity  
     

     
    Was Hitler a Christian? To most people the question would be absurd
     . 
     
    […] 

    Hitler’s attitude toward Christianity, on the other hand, appears beyond dispute.  Spiritually and morally he was a nihilist, whose creed boiled down to a crude social Darwinism  – the survival of the fittest.

    The German churches were rival organisations to the would-be totalitarian Nazi Party. They were therefore to be co-opted and controlled in the short-term, and eventually eliminated.  He treated not only Christianity, but all religion, with contempt. Attempts by Nazis such as Rosenberg to revive allegedly ancient Teutonic forms of worship were indulged, but not encouraged.
     
    […] 

    Dawkins starts by arguing that Hitler never formally renounced his childhood Catholicism. That is true, but it is equally true that Stalin never formally repudiated his adolescent affiliation to the Russian Orthodox Church, nor Mao the Buddhism of his early teens. In the case of each of the three dictators, his rejection of religion was demonstrated by his subsequent career.
     
    […] 

    A former acquaintance of Hitler not cited by Dawkins, Hermann Rauschning, claimed that Hitler told him:   “One is either a Christian or a German. You can’t be both.” 
     
    […] 

    The “final solution” of the Christian problem, had Hitler finished up triumphant, can be deduced from the words of two of his closest Nazi associates. Heinrich Himmler vowed that   “We shall not rest until we have rooted out Christianity”,
     
     while Martin Bormann demanded that
     
    “…the influence of the churches has to be completely eliminated”.

     
     

     

    Sources : http://newsweekly.com.au/article.php?id=3332

    And finally , the nazis preferred alliances with atheist regimes. 

  35. Yves / Feb 18 2013 11:24 pm

    Hello,
    I’m a French , and very glad to read what you say about atheism.
    In France, lot of people are atheists , and I can tell you as a half-black man that I have never met a non-racist atheist. Anticlericalism has been a long time tradition in french society, especially in science and education and racism is still hidden in the mind of many atheist intellectuals.
    I’ve even heard that during the french colonization in Africa , atheist scientists have made some sexual experiments which tried to prove that African can be crossed with apes. But when you talk about this, it’s complete embarrassment , as if everybody knows …

  36. Chad / Feb 18 2013 3:04 pm

    i will not deny racist atheists. they are out there. but to say that all of them are racist is a total generalization.

  37. Miguel González / Jan 24 2013 6:31 am

    First point: I am not atheist, and I am not Christian. Some years ago I took refuge at Buddhism, so I think it’s appropiate to say that I am Buddhist. Anyway, I’m not Buddhist, either. This sounds like a paradox, but paradoxes are a good way to leave the ‘ego jail’; Zen masters know it well. So, yes, I am also atheist.

    Second point: I am from South Spain, so, although I consider myself to be white, I know that in the USA they will call me Hispanic.

    And third point: claiming that different races involve different levels of intelligence is, at least, risky. As far as I know, atheists consider themselves to be logical people, whose reasonings are always based on facts, and not beliefs. Well, the fact here is that there are no facts related to the claim that intelligence is different depending on the race. And I’ll explain why. Intelligence is something still on debate. There is not a final word about it yet, and, for instance, until very recently we didn’t discover that emotions have a prominent role in our thinking process.

    Psychology is not an exact science, and that is so because our brain physiology is so complex that it’s extremely difficult to ‘mathematically’ predict our thoughts. If we were able to compare the genomes of, let’s say, Swedish and Nigerian people, and we were able to identify every single gene, then it would be possible to conclude that there are or there aren’t certain significant differences in intelligence among races. Unfortunately, this sounds like science fiction. So what do we do, then? We turn to IQ tests.

    Now, let me say that IQ tests are not objective for this purpose, either. They were designed in the white world, with a white culture background, and thus there’s no guarantee that they will have acceptable results for a tribe in Ethiopia. The most we can deduce is that cultures are different. But, what would it happen if we raised a newborn Ethiopian child in an European family? Very probably, he’d end up scoring between 90 and 120 in an IQ test. There are examples of non-white intelligent people: Barack Obama is intelligent, right?

    Nonetheless, it’s not even necessary to be raised in a Western country in order to acquire what we call intelligence. For example, it was amazing to me to see how fast some members of the Shiwiar tribe from Ecuador adapted to the living style of Spain in a Spanish TV reality show called Perdidos en la ciudad (Lost in the city), and how difficult it was for a Spanish family to adapt to life in the Amazon in a previous TV reality called Perdidos en la tribu (Lost in the tribe). My conclusion is that primitive cultures are more prepared to cope with the unexpected than civilized cultures.

    By the way, to use a language that ‘smart’ people will understand, I declare that, after several tests, my IQ seems to be 133 in the Wechsler scale, not bad for a non atheist Hispanic 😉

  38. Stephen / Jan 11 2013 4:15 pm

    Hi itsnobody. I wanted to apologize to you for a prior incident. In another article you wrote (most overrated geniuses) I bombarded you with personal attacks and ad hominems out of anger over the fact that you included several of my favorite thinkers on your list. After reading this article, you’ve gained all my respect back, and them some. Agreed word for word with everything you just said. I’ve never been happier to be a Christian than I am now. Im a black southerner who attended a predominantly white church, and I never experienced an ounce of racism during that time, not even a cold stare or refusal of a handshake. Everybody that I came into contact with greeted me with a warm smile and the utmost hospitality, as if I looked no different than they do. Now hanging out with atheists is a completely different experience. I wouldn’t know this first hand because I refuse to be friends with an atheist, but one of my best friends, who’s a christian, hangs out with a group of atheists because his girlfriend is an atheist and is a member of this clique. He’s told me dozens of stories about how they’re constantly making off-putting racial remarks, making sarcastic jokes about him that concern his race, and constantly asking him questions regarding his Christian beliefs in relation to his race. One of them supposedly asked him why black people lacked the ability to think for themselves (except he tried to mask it in a way that sounded less racist).

    I agree that atheists are by far the worst type of people on the planet. They’re miserable, hateful, judgmental, and they’re skeptical and pessimistic about everything for no real reason other than the fact that they think it makes them a “free thinker” when in actuality it makes them intolerable douche tools. Thank God I was born in a Christian family, in a Christian country.

  39. raafia / Oct 18 2012 2:10 pm

    If any of you know anything about science then you’ll understand that there is no genetic basis to race! There is no such thing as different human races (in fact there is more genetic variation within the so-called races than between them). My challenge to the author is that racist ideology can infiltrate itself into any other belief system (so a racist atheist, christian, or muslim etc. does not necessarily reflect an flaw inherent to atheism/christianity/islam etc.) similar to sexism. I

  40. Me / Aug 10 2012 6:31 am

    You’re wrong. I’m an atheist. My whole family s atheistic. We are not racist…far from it. Case closed.

  41. Taylor / Jul 27 2012 10:47 am

    please take notice that when you say “all atheists are racist” you yourself are stereotyping atheists. I couldn’t bare to read your ignorant article because of your ironic first sentence.

  42. Wilhelm Johannson / Jul 24 2012 7:14 am

    Youre arguments are Invalid all these so called “Atheist Countries are most racist” Netherlands- Amsterdam is the only City in the world with the most different cultures, they take Immigrants and Refugees from other countries, their crime rates are lower than the US, their Countries are more stable than the US and overall the People are more Helpful and happier than in the US . All these countries do more Social and humanitarian work than the US. So stop with your false Information and start opening your Eyes and stop make Christians look bad… I am one.

  43. Tim Williams / Jul 21 2012 11:18 pm

    The majority of atheists are or were jewish. Examples: Mark Zuckerberg, Daniel Radcliffe and Isaac Asimov.

    • YVES / Feb 24 2013 12:06 pm

      Jews is not a race , it is about culture and religion. If you don’t think so, it means that you are a racist.

  44. Tim Williams / Jul 21 2012 11:13 pm

    I have friends that are African-American, Hispanic and Asian.

  45. Tim Williams / Jul 21 2012 11:02 pm

    “Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.” -Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf

    My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. …Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross. …
    – Adolf Hitler, speech on April 12, 1922
    I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.” – Hitler to General Gerhard Engel, 1941
    Today Christians … stand at the head of [this country]… I pledge that I never will tie myself to parties who want to destroy Christianity .. We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit … We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theater, and in the press – in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past … (few) years.
    – Adolf Hitler, quoted in: The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, 1922-1939, Vol. 1 (London, Oxford University Press, 1942)

    • Yves / Feb 23 2013 6:28 pm

      Hitler made an alliance with atheists in 1939. 
      Atheists wanted to keep this alliance but Hitler finally invaded the USSR because he needed oil, and other resources, but he never made anti-atheist speechs.
       

  46. Tim Williams / Jul 21 2012 10:56 pm

    You’re an idiot and a bigot. Barack Obama’s father was an atheist. I’m not a racist either.

  47. Robert / Jun 20 2012 12:28 pm

    Telling the truth isn’t racist. Scientifically speaking some people are smarter, faster, etc. In the same way that some people are taller or wider. In short, get over your insecurities. It’s not racism, it’s reality

    • itsnobody / Jul 1 2012 7:30 pm

      Telling what you believe to be the truth has nothing to do with being racist or not.

      You’re just using a no true Scotsman fallacy trying re-define the definition of racism.

      If you believe that certain ethnic groups are genetically less or more intelligent then by definition you’re a racist. Why can’t atheists understand this?

      It doesn’t matter if it’s actually true or not, it would still be racist.

      Get over it, you’re a racist and it’s reality!

      • James / Aug 11 2012 3:13 am

        There is no correlation between race and intelligence once you factor in SES. And if there were a correlation, then it would not be racist to believe it. I worked with the mentally handicapped for seven years. It was clear that I was more intelligent than they were. Is it discrimination to believe that? Is it discrimination to believe I can hear sound better than a deaf person? Is it discrimination to believe that on average, men are taller than women? No. It’s only discrimination if I believe or act like I am Superior to them on an ethical level and thus deserve better treatment. That would be racist/sexist/ableist etc.

    • YVES / Feb 25 2013 6:30 pm

      Robert ,
      This the reality of yours :


      Also people who are from nonreligious backgrounds most often think atheists are more dishonest than rapists.

      http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2011-12-10/religion-atheism/51777612/1

  48. dafk.net / Jun 13 2012 5:38 pm

    hmm…………itsnobody in a way your like me.

  49. Joe / Jun 12 2012 4:51 pm

    Fcuk you. Thats all.

  50. itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 2:40 am

    Case closed. I’ve won this debate.

    All the atheists here have agreed that they believe that certain ethnic groups are genetically more or less intelligent and don’t consider it as racism, just like the atheists in Sweden and Denmark.

    Once society gives up this dumb delusional idea (as atheists believe) that there is something divinely equal about all human beings, nationalism and racial discrimination should be common, just like in liberal atheist countries like Sweden and Denmark.

    Atheists don’t consider believing that certain ethnic groups are genetically more or less intelligent as racism, nor do they consider nationalism or racial discrimination as racism. I don’t really know what atheists consider to be racism.

    Here’s a common definition of racism:
    “a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others”

    I know that atheists are going to try to re-define the word racism, just like how they’ve tried to re-define many other words.

    All the countries with rising atheist populations should become nationalist soon as well.

    I predict that around 2030-2060 nationalist societies should become common all around the world specifically because of the atheist population being much higher then. The more people believe in evolution the better it is for nationalists.

    Anyone who knows atheists knows how racist they are, truthfully the most disgusting people in the world.

    I don’t think there’s much I can do to stop what’s going to happen, and I know that the main reason why atheists have intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism is specifically because they agree with and support it.

    I already saw the lame atheist Facebook groups that link here, all they did was throw their lame ad hominems at me. Why are atheists so afraid of posting their comments here in front of me for?

    Since I’ve already won this debate atheists should just go back to their “agreeing contest atheist fan sites”, you know the sites where atheists come together to agree with each other, intentionally make fun of theists, and have their arguments and beliefs protected from criticism and scrutiny (a typical anti-science position).

    I’m far too advanced for atheists, just look at how pathetic they are.

    Thanks for the laughs subhumans!

    • Anonymous / Apr 3 2012 1:50 pm

      I’m an Atheist and I know for a fact that I’m not racist, therefore your conclusion that ALL Atheist’s are racist is wrong.

  51. Tris Stock (@mygodlesslife) / Feb 24 2012 9:32 am

    I am an atheist. I do not recognise Richard Dawkins as my ‘leader’, nor do I recognise anyone else as my leader beyond the elected Prime Minister of the UK (I don’t care for his politics much, but he is at least democratically elected by the populace).

    The reasons I do not consider myself a racist are simple. The first being that I recognise the human race as the unifying principle that unites all of humanity. The second being that – unlike humanists – I do not necessarily favour the human race over any other race or species.

    I would be interested to hear how you can justify calling me a racist of any kind of flavour.

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 12:16 am

      I guess your comment re-confirms why I consider atheists to be subhuman in terms of intelligence.

      What do you mean that you recognize “the human race as the unifying principle that unites all of humanity”….is that a faith-based belief?

      You’ve failed to explain how you can believe in evolution and that the physical brain is the mind and not be a racist….so are you trying to argue that “just because I believe that certain ethnic groups are genetically more or less intelligent doesn’t mean that I’m a racist”?

      • ravan / Dec 12 2012 10:45 pm

        Racism is arbitrarily believing that there are differences between races without any actual evidence to prove it. Acknowledging that there might be differences between races because of different environmental pressures over an evolutionary time frame is not racism, it is simply being honest things that have happened in our past, out of our control. Do we need to place undue importance on these differences? Of course not. There is great value in a diversity of skills and aptitude. I am without question “smarter” than some and “less smart” than others. We can measure this in various ways. I still maintain affectionate and productive friendships with people who are “smarter” and “less smart” than myself, because I don’t think a fixation on this quality is all that important to everyday relations, nor should it dictate whether or not I treat someone with dignity or respect. I can admit differences in intelligence between people, but I don’t have to be an “intellectist” and treat people disrespectfully, or establish “intellectist” institutions to subjugate people who are more or less intelligent than me. I think most of us live in tacit admission of this one example, not mention countless other such examples. It isn’t a problem.

        I think in some cases people overextend conclusions and pass unfair judgment on people, as James Watson has done. This is all the more embarrassing for him because he is a scientist, and his conclusions were entirely unscientific, not to mention disgusting. He was probably just racist to begin with because he grew up during a period when racism and racist institutions were normal. You will find plenty of Christians who are racist, and plenty of atheists. If you have established a conclusion before you even set out on your investigation, of course you will tend to see evidence for your conclusion and ignore other evidence. You need to be reasonable about defining racism instead of arbitrarily moving the goal posts, redefining racism just so you can slander a group of people against whom you have a negative predisposition. That’s like an ad hominem en masse, and it’s unfair. Not to mention that you used some very impolite language.

        I would not call myself atheist. I simply choose not to worry about metaphysical questions that have no bearing on my life except to perhaps cause the occasional conflict with someone for whom these immaterial questions matter so much that they would like to see me agree with them about it. There is too much joy and too many positive relationships to build to worry about immaterial and potentially divisive things. Some people insist on calling this atheism. I also work in biomedical science and must adhere to the principles of logical positivism and critical thought every day. If I fail at this, I do not have a livelihood. Engineers who design airplanes, cars, and medical devices rely on these principles. Doctors rely not only on logical positivistic thought, but principles of evolution underly medical theory, as in drug resistant bacteria and how to respond to it. Evolution and the more fundamental philosophy behind it is necessary for the proper functioning of society. There can be no denying it.

        Further, an evolutionary account of race differences, if such an account even exists, could not rationally claim categorical differences between individuals. Even if, say, Kenyans tend to be taller than Londoners – which they do – that doesn’t mean that every Londoner is shorter than every Kenyan. There will be some Londoners who are taller. If we include all of Africa, we are including the Babenzele pygmies, who are much shorter than most of the planet. The same goes for any other differences. Therefore it would not make rational sense to form categorical opinions about races, nor to form societal institutions like apartheid and slavery that are the hallmark of actual racism, which to be clear, you are not attributing to atheists in this article. The upshot is that we would still have to take each individual on his or her own terms, and we are left with the same conclusion as if we had rejected racism out of common sense morality, except we have done it rationally.

        To conclude, I am not saying that I “believe” that there might be evolutionary differences between races. Nor am I saying that it isn’t possible. I haven’t read that much about it, or looked at the data, it isn’t my area of expertise. However, I live in a world that is made possible by the same intellectual principles that validate evolution. I cannot live in that world and benefit from it, then be selective in my acceptance of all the intellectual products. I would be a hypocrite, and so would you if you arbitrarily reject specific conclusions because they make you feel bad or it’s expedient to slander a group of people who you dislike for no particular reason. I am a Mexican-American. By an anti-intellectual racist account of my history, I should be landscaping or be a slave like my ancestors were. However, by a rational account of my history and abilities, which would necessarily include an evolutionary account if it were true, I am intelligent and hard-working, so I have found my place and my fulfillment in areas outside of what would stereotypically be my “place” in society. Rejecting a rational account would only make it easier for people to perpetuate inequity and injustice, because what else could I say in my defense other than empty moral platitudes with no real persuasive weight? I really sincerely hope you have a great day.

  52. itsnobody / Feb 21 2012 11:25 pm

    I feel bad for the atheists. Just look at their comments and how weak their arguments are. Then look my responses and how they’re just on another level.

    The majority of comments from atheists here fit into the categories I described when predicting how atheists would respond (I now put a box around that portion of my article so that atheists can see it).

    How boring and un-challenging. After all this time I was expecting at least one atheist to put up a strong argument, instead all I get is weak arguments. I can easily destroy every single one of these comments with little to no effort.

    When I get more time and return I’ll destroy and kill off every single argument here.

    Liberal atheists all know that Martin Luther King Jr. was just another dumb delusional creationist reverend!

    Nazis/atheists rejoice!

    • An average person / Apr 27 2012 12:57 pm

      you, sir, are a self assured, disrespectful, judgemental person.
      The only reason that we don’t respond to your pitiful responses is because we just do not feel the need to waste our time on such trifles, not because we are “awestruck” or anything.
      you talk about these small debates as if “destroying” them will make us believe that, despite everything, we should immediately start believing this fiction. And, also, we are not racist.
      Case closed.

  53. itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 3:26 am

    Hey Mr Itsnobody we really like you, and think you’re a champion. You should upload your real picture, so we can all see what great person comes up with all this groovy shit.

    • itsnobody / Feb 21 2012 11:18 pm

      Nah man I’m remaining anonymous until I achieve what I’m actually seeking…

      • An average person / May 5 2012 2:08 pm

        are you seriously talking to youself?

  54. Chris P / Feb 5 2012 8:56 pm

    This is is really strange because a huge portion of the ultra religious that live in the South are absolutely provable racists. I haven’t met an atheist yet that is a racist in normal terminology.

    This writer bends the meaning of words to suit his own purposes. All we hear from Republicans is that Obama “is a Muslim” – a totally racist remark.

    • itsnobody / Feb 22 2012 1:05 am

      lol you don’t consider anything to be racism except for of course violence against a certain race, just like all atheists, right?

      What do you mean by “racist in normal terminology” since you don’t consider believing that certain ethnic groups are genetically less intelligent is racist?

      Your argument of accusing Southerner religious people of being racist just fits into the category I predicted of changing the subject to claiming that Theists are racists.

      Growing up watching TV I had always imagined that the South was the most racist place in the world, but all my non-white friends living in the deep South specifically told me that there wasn’t much racism there. When I visited the deep South as a non-white male I didn’t experience any kind of racism, no angry stares, racial slurs, or anything. The people there were nice and kind towards me, they seemed to be much nicer than the people in the North.

      The only racism I’ve experienced in the US come from atheists I’ve known in private, not from religious Christians or Theists. I don’t recall experiencing any kind of racism in the US prior to 2004. The more atheists you get to know the more you realize that basically all atheists are racists.

      It’s easy to see why 100% of atheist countries are racist, there is not even one atheist country that is not extraordinarily racist. It’s the same kind of people. I know your atheist kind.

      “Bends the meaning of words”? Like where? Another baseless claim from the atheist.

      Here’s a video of a Hillary Clinton supporter – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaxECcTjCuw

      To any atheists reading this I just want you know that deep deep down inside I don’t consider you or any of your other low-life racist atheist friends as human beings (unless they give up their racism).

  55. Costanza / Jan 31 2012 9:20 pm

    A couple of things. First, you cannot prove your case by listing examples of atheists that have that point of view; you may prove that those individuals hold that opinion, but unless you are ready to track down every atheist and find out their opinion, you argument holds little water. In addition, you are talking about evolutionists, not atheists. They are not always the same. In addition (although it is still racist) they do not say which races are better and which are not; they say that there will be undoubtedly some difference. According to evolutionary theory, there will be some differences in intelligence. That is not to say that one race will be ‘dumb’ and another ‘smart’, but that different races will have different physical brain structures that will provide potential in different areas. It is the same as skin pigmentation. Black is not better or worse than white on the whole; it is different. Both are better suited for the environment in which they are found. It would be the same with brain structure; if one portion of the brain is more useful in one area, it will eventually become larger than it would have been. Nobody is suggesting that one race is superior over all others; I have no idea where you are pulling that one from.

    • Bryan / Feb 6 2012 11:21 am

      The quotes from more “modern” atheists that I read weren’t “racist”. They merely pointed out that there is no reason to assume that intellectual capacity would not evolve separately along with all other biological traits. It didn’t promote the intellect of any one particular race of another and doesn’t claim that a member of a particular race must be inferior to members of different race.

      The quotes that I did read that had a definite racists tinge to them were from a guy born in 1928 (James D Watson). Being born in a time when racism was the norm doesn’t excuse being racist (if he was), but using a racist atheist as some sort of proof that all atheists are racist is just dishonest. Show me a white southern baptist from the first half of the 20th century that wasn’t racist and I’ll show you a thousand that were. The example of Metzger is just that, one example. We could just as easily site Nathan Beford Forrest, the first grand wizard of the KKK, a Christian.

      Basically, the author of this blast of hot air (which seems to be the norm on this blog) does a pretty poor job of anything other than making himself appear foolish.

      • itsnobody / Feb 21 2012 11:15 pm

        @Bryan yeah so your response fits into the category I described of claiming that “believing that certain races are genetically more or less intelligent” isn’t racist

        You are also just playing semantics, what’s the difference between “less intelligent” vs. “inferior in terms of intelligence”? There is no difference, it’s the same.

        Since you’re an atheist (and therefore a low-life) I’m sure you don’t really consider anything to be racism.

        I didn’t use racist atheists as proof that all atheists are racist I established a causation between evolution and believing that certain races are genetically more or less intelligent

        Comparing a Tom Metzger and Nathan Beford Forrest is just a mistake. Tom Metzger is an atheist in a country with a 0.7% atheist population where as Nathan Beford Forrest is a Christian in a majority Christian country. How can so many racists in the US be atheists despite their being such a low atheist population in the US?

        Citing racists Christians doesn’t establish causation fools (atheists), just mere correlation. Of course there are many racist Christians, but are they racist specifically because they are Christian (causation)?

        Christianity has been a great obstacle for White Nationalists. No mainstream form of Christianity accepts nationalism because of Biblical passages. This is causation, religion causes people to not be nationalists. Atheists/Nationalists constantly rant about the Bible being from the “Joo’s” text. The less religious people are the easier it is for nationalists.

        On the other hand believing in evolution and the brain is the mind directly causes someone to believe that certain races are genetically more or less intelligent. This is causation.

        Once society accepts that certain ethnic groups are genetically more or less intelligent then justifying nationalism and racism should be extraordinarily easy.

        By the year 2030 when the atheist population is much higher there should be lots of nationalist countries, I don’t know where the US will be by then.

    • itsnobody / Feb 21 2012 11:13 pm

      @Costanza lol what a weak argument…my argument proves causation not mere correlation except for of course some atheists who don’t believe in evolution! What a great argument, so you do you believe in evolution and that the brain is the mind?

      So what percentage of atheists believe in evolution?

      • GreenDiamond / Jul 28 2012 7:35 am

        I am curious as to your rationalization of why is it that the list of rasist countries you provide of countries who give developing countries (non white) the highest amount of humanitarien aid as a percent of the donor countries GNP and per capita?

        Why do these racist/athiest (per your claims) countries do that?! Why do they take in so many non white refugees as well?! Would this behaviour not indicate a lower level of animosity towards individuals of different races?

        Plus, doesn’t the bible mention that god created the different races?

  56. Asmodeus Mictian / Jan 24 2012 11:56 am

    I’m having a difficult time actually forming a rebuttal to this. Mind you, not because I agree with it, or that I believe it’s solid and valid. I’m just having trouble finding a starting point. If you’re going to take comments from over half a century ago and use them in modern context, you should understand that many, many people have said things that, at the time, were acceptable. Upon reflection though, they seem horrifying. I’ll do what I can at some point to actually go through and comment upon the whole article.

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 12:18 am

      October 2007 was a half century ago (when James D. Watson made his statement)?
      1993 was half a century ago (when Richard Dawkins made his statement)?
      2006 was half a century ago (when Richard Lynn published his book “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis”)?

      Thanks for re-confirming that atheists are subhuman in terms of intelligence, the most disgusting form of life.

  57. Anthony E / Jan 23 2012 9:36 pm

    There is no racism here. This is evolutionary theory. There isn’t enough diversity between a person living in England when compared to an indigenous Chinese or an Indigenous South American Native.

    Yet as much as ‘whites’ may claim superiority, it may be that people from New Guinea who currently hold the record for the highest average IQ would be the ones. There is racism only in claiming – with impunity – that yours is the best race.

    The truth is that racism is in believing that we would be better off as a species with less diversity. The only thing we gain through less diversity is a greater proximity to extinction.

    • Anthony E / Jan 23 2012 9:37 pm

      Should have proofread better. “There isn’t as much diversity between a European and an Asian, or either with an American Native as between two gazelle grazing in the same field.”

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 12:22 am

      What do you mean there’s no racism? Can you explain how people geographically separated for 30,000+ years could have evolved to have the same intellectual capacities?

      “there is less mtDNA difference between dogs, wolves, and coyotes than there is between the various ethnic groups of human beings, which are recognized as a single species.” (Coppinger & Schneider, 1995)

      Based on mtDNA differences I’m sure in the future atheist societies will consider sub-Saharan Africans as a different human species.

      Oh wait I forgot atheists in atheist countries like Denmark and Sweden already view sub-Saharan Africans as subhuman.

  58. Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 7:35 pm

    Those quotes about evolution aren’t racist at all. -.-

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 12:23 am

      Of course they are not. Atheists don’t consider believing that certain races are genetically more or less intelligent as racism.

      So your argument fits into the category I already described.

      I hope people understand why I view atheists as low-life disgusting people.

  59. Brandon / Jan 23 2012 4:59 pm

    Not sure if trolling, or just incredibly stupid.

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 12:25 am

      Not sure if you’re this stupid, but accusing me of trolling and being stupid is just an argumentum ad hominem.

      Atheists are truthfully the dumbest form of life.

  60. Patrina Chamney / Jan 23 2012 4:23 pm

    Having read some of the other (quite cogent) comments, I went and checked our ‘about’ page. You are exhibiting serious symptoms of grandiose delusions (which I’ve encountered before) and, seriously, you should see a psychiatric professional. Not being snarky; I’m concerned for you.

    • Patrina Chamney / Jan 23 2012 4:24 pm

      typo – should have been ‘your “about” page’

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 12:27 am

      Accusing me of exhibiting delusions is just another lame argumentum ad hominem, but don’t worry atheists are such stupid idiotic gullible people they’ll really believe that ad hominems refute an argument.

  61. Patrina Chamney / Jan 23 2012 4:17 pm

    I’m an atheist, and I find racism (as well as the other ‘isms’ and -phobias) disgusting and try to counter them whenever I run across them. Atheists, like others, come in all stripes, and undoubtedly some of them are, to be polite, jerks. But racism, etc., are hardly universal among atheists. Now I’m going to have to go check some of the quotes you posted, to see what the actual meaning was in context.

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 12:31 am

      Like how? Go on and explain to me how you can believe in evolution and the brain is the mind and not be a racist….oh wait I forgot, atheists don’t have explanations they just have ad hominems.

      I know this disgusting people called “atheists” and how racist they are, search as much as you want you’ll NEVER find any group of people as disgusting as these.

  62. Johnny Nosala / Jan 23 2012 2:57 pm

    atheist. not racist. your claim is fallacious and invalid. the fact that you think that anecdotal data supports your stereotype terrifies me. you make me disappointed in human intelligence.

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 12:11 am

      You make me disappointed that your response is just what I predicted, claiming not to be racist but not giving any explanation as to how.

      I guess atheists really are subhuman in terms of intelligence.

  63. Jamin Szczesny / Jan 23 2012 2:13 pm

    Check out this short clip on what Morgan Freeman thinks about racism http://youtu.be/I3cGfrExozQ

    Also: I’m an Atheist and I do not like the ignorant immoral brain washing religious people do to each other (most do it unwittingly as per their brainwashing). Therefore I will not engage in religious discourse or activity with a person without refuting almost everything about the practices. Especially when people tell my daughter she will go to hell to be burned and tortured for all eternity if she does not believe them and do what they say…
    All things aside – As an Atheist It’s not the religious people (or any people) I dislike but rather the religious mind viruses they try to spread to others. AMEN!

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 12:45 am

      Morgan Freeman is a non-white atheist so what’s your point?

      The rest of your rant was just changing the subject to talking about not liking religious minded people.

      You haven’t refuted any statement that I made.

      Thanks for displaying your subhuman atheist mind.

  64. Lissa / Jan 23 2012 2:11 pm

    I’m a part Mexican atheist and I’m not racist. I know black atheists as well. And I think it’s important to note, that most atheists accept evolution so when you accept that you accept that everyone came from the Fertile Crescent, the Cradle of Civilization. There are even t shirts that many atheists wear that says, “We are all Africans” on it. Here’s the link to the shirt on richarddawkins.net http://store.richarddawkins.net/products/we-are-all-africans

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 1:21 am

      What’s the point of pointing out non-white atheists? It’s always funny to see delusional non-white atheists trying to fit in with white atheists.

      I’m sure now that Richard Dawkins has gained fame he will pretend not be racist, I’m sure that he strongly agrees with James D. Watson’s statements, and I’m sure that atheists don’t consider believing that certain ethnic groups are genetically superior or inferior in terms of intelligence to be racist.

      Also saying that we all came from Africans is just like saying we all came from an ape-like ancestor or that we all came from bacteria.

      You’ve still failed to explain how ethnic groups geographically separated could have evolved to have the same intellectual capacities. Biologists already accept that certain ethnic groups are taller, shorter, are more or less prone to certain diseases, etc….but because of political correctness they don’t openly say they believe that certain ethnic groups are more or less intelligent.

      Evolution doesn’t support the idea that we are all equal at all.

  65. Not a racist atheist. / Jan 23 2012 11:26 am

    All i have to say is i’m an atheist and i’m not racist.

  66. balabanoba / Jan 23 2012 10:13 am

    my brain has collapsed. this entire article is a mind-numbing fallacy. which is funny, considering some of the “humble” self-descriptors you use on your about page. how did it go? something about your grasp of argumentation even rivaling that of Aristotle?

    • itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 1:23 am

      Wow, you ranted about something on my About page and refuted not one statement that I made, but don’t worry atheists are unusually gullible people so they’ll really believe that personally attacking me refutes an argument I made.

      So boring….not challenging.

  67. Satan / Jan 23 2012 10:10 am

    I’ll be seeing you soon.

  68. Novakation / Jan 23 2012 9:25 am

    That’s funny, all religious people I have met are batshit crazy and believe in mythical beings. All religious people I have met are close minded, homophobic, racist hypocrites.
    I am a black atheist and not one of my atheist friends are racists. You need to get out more and stop reading crap on the internet.

  69. PeaceFlower / Jan 23 2012 9:07 am

    Wow, your article reeks of confirmation bias (selecting evidence to support your opinions as opposed to forming opinions based on evidence).

    Calling all atheist racist is like saying all colour blind people are racist. Your article is extremely hateful and hypocritical. You decry racism and bigotry, yet impose attributes on an entire group of people and claim others have superiority as a result. That sounds like the textbook definition of racism. You even say at one point it “would be better if they all died off”.

    Just so you know, I am not an atheist, I am Christian but I love all people on God’s Earth. I sincerely hope you don’t call yourself Christian as you are not demonstrating the attributes of love and tolerance that Christ taught.

    PS:

    Using multisyllabic words does not you cleaver or make your points any more valid.

  70. Justin Kinser / Jan 23 2012 8:50 am

    The irony of accusing an entire demographic of being prejudiced…

    You’ve constructed a passionate example of Poe’s Law, but you’re missing that repulsive unctuousness of the real hate-mongers.

  71. joe / Jan 23 2012 8:24 am

    moron

  72. Todd / Jan 23 2012 8:13 am

    The reason “Atheists as a whole don’t denounce racism” is because atheists are not a collective group. There are atheistic groups, but atheism is not a unified ideology, its just a belief. It is like saying “Theism” is a religion. Theism isn’t a religion, its a belief. Likewise with atheism. Atheists and theists can be as racist or un-racist as they come, their belief/disbelief in god has nothing to do with it. The same way people who don’t believe in Loch Ness can be as racist or un-racist.

    I had to laugh when you said “its up to us theists to stop racism”. Religion has promoted more racial hate than anything else. The KKK is an excellent example, but you should also be aware that it was the Bible and the Curse of Ham that was used as a justification of the enslavement of Africans by many Europeans.

    Just so you know, I’m atheist, my long term girl friend is Asian and my best friend is Black (Jamaican to be precise).

    • Todd / Jan 23 2012 8:18 am

      Just to clarify the last sentence: I’m White, so if I were a racists I wouldn’t be in an interacial relationship or have a black friend would I?

    • Riley / Jul 14 2015 9:27 pm

      According to Wikipedia :

      A review of David Goldenberg’s The Curse of Ham: Race and Slavery in Early Judaism, Christianity and Islam states that Goldenberg “argues persuasively that the biblical name Ham bears no relationship at all to the notion of blackness and as of now is of unknown etymology. 

       

      • itsnobody / Jul 14 2015 9:45 pm

        It’s the same nasty attitude from you and your low-life racist/atheist friends have, whenever confronted with atheists being racist instead of coming out to oppose racism (what would we expect if they actually disagreed with racism) they just change the subject to claiming that Theists are racist because they agree with and support racism and want atheists to be free to be as racist as they want.

        For your information White Nationalists and Nazis hate slavery, they think that it’s terrible to bring in non-white immigration just because some people want slaves, they want a Whites-only type of society, not bringing in African immigrants because people want slaves.

        When Martin Luther King Jr. was marching he said that Illinois was more racist than the South, the main reason why people in the North opposed slavery was to preserve a Whites-only type of society.

        “I have seen many demonstrations in the South, but I have never seen anything so hostile and so hateful as I’ve seen here today” – Martin Luther King Jr., in Chicago, Illinois, August 1966

        The parents and grandparents of modern day Illinoisan people are the same people that MLK Jr. was referring to.

        Illinoisans are terrible people with nasty attitudes.

        When you look at a list of White Supremacists almost none of them are Christian. This is true in the present and the past, even in the most religious Christian countries they are still staunchly anti-Christian like Revilo P. Oliver from the 1960s and Alex Linder in modern times.

        I already explained why the atheist/agnostic/non-religious population directly causes White Nationalism and Nazism to grow, so why you can’t you nasty low-life fools (atheists) who claim to be non-racist open up your nasty low-life mouth and oppose racism for?

        Instead of coming out to oppose racism the atheist community instead comes out to make atheists look good.

        On this normal atheist blog site 100% of the comments are from racists atheists (the site is meant to be a normal atheist fan site not a racist or White Nationalist site) – http://www.atheistrev.com/2007/11/atheism-and-white-power.html

      • Riley / Jul 15 2015 7:37 am

        @ Itsnobody ,

        Are u stupid ? I wasn’t defending the atheists.
        I was answering to Todd and Heige.
        Todd claimed that religion justified racism because of Ham curse which is untrue according to Cronenberg.
        While Heige claimed that Norway is a full-fledged atheist country whereas many lawmakers in Norway are lutheran ministers and try hard to avoid the atheists to take control of their kiingdom that still have a Protestant monarchy.

      • Riley / Jul 15 2015 7:41 am

        Sorry , I meant : according to David Goldenberg …

      • Riley / Jul 15 2015 8:11 am

        @ Itsnobody 

        It’s untrue to say that nazis hate slavery ; nazis ( and communists ) enslaved millions men and women. Of Gypsies and Jews were enslaved first because they were the main minorities but there is no doubt the nazis would have enslave Africa if the nazis had won WW2.

        Perhaps you don’t know that European racists use the same Confederate flag (along with the nazi flag) Dylann Roof waved.

      • itsnobody / Jul 29 2015 8:41 am

        I don’t know of any White Nationalists or Nazis who support slavery, bringing in lots of African immigration because people want slavery.

        White Nationalists and Nazis universally oppose slavery, they want a Whites-only type of society, not a society with lots of African or non-white immigrants brought in.

        They want Africans and non-whites to stay in their own countries.

      • Riley / Jul 29 2015 8:56 am

        @ Itsnobody

        You’re wrong.
        European nations practiced slavery in their colonies but did not import African slaves on their soil.
        For intance : Portugal abolished slavery only in Portugal but allowed it in Brazil.
        In fact , importation in Europe of Africans and Amerindians was very restricted in order to keep the race pure.
        White nationalists and nazis intend to act the same way with Blacks.

      • itsnobody / Aug 2 2015 10:32 pm

        How am I wrong if you’re agreeing with me?

        White Nationalists and Nazis oppose slavery and also colonizing.

      • Riley / Aug 3 2015 3:45 am

        @ Itsnobody 

        Don’t play the fool ! I evidently never said that white nationalists oppose slavery and colonising.
        Quite the contrary : white nationalists are gung-ho supporters of the colonial era.   

      • Riley / Aug 3 2015 4:47 am

        @ Itsnobody 

        You seem to believe that the north of the USA ( and probably Canada ) opposed slavery to keep the race pure. It’s a stupid view . 
        England launched the process of ending slavery long before Abolition became official in the 19th , by trying to end slave trade first : by monitoring maritime routes in the 18th. 

        The distance between African shores and and the north of the former English colonies in America explains by itself why this part of the world controlled by their Royal Navy had no or fewer slaves than South Carolina or Georgia ( as well as Jamaica , Haïti , Cuba , Puerto Rico , etc… )
        In the contrary , the reason why Brazil has so many African descendants is because the transportation of slaves between Africa and Brazil was much cheaper ; because the losses were reduced. 

        Trade is always a matter of distance and cost. 

      • itsnobody / Sep 18 2015 9:40 am

        I don’t think it’s a stupid view, it’s a true view.

        There aren’t any White Nationalists that I’m aware of in support of slavery….if you know of any point them out. They think that bringing in African immigration because people want slaves is terrible…they would probably prefer White slaves if they did support slavery.

        The people in England and Europe who opposed slavery are also racist.

        White Nationalism is about supporting a Whites-only type of society and hating Christianity.

        It’s the free market, free speech, free society!
        Support socialism, support a Whites-only type of society!

      • Riley / Sep 18 2015 9:00 pm

        Hi Itsnobody,

        Perhaps you should read a comprehensive study of the very origin of nationalism :

        http://study.com/academy/lesson/nationalism-grows-in-europe-timeline-events-impact.html 

        Once you clearly understand the definiton of nationalism , see what white nationalism is all about :

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1038453/The-French-Fuhrer-Genocidal-Napoleon-barbaric-Hitler-historian-claims.html

        Notice that Napoleon was excommunicated during his lifetime.

    • Riley / Jul 15 2015 7:57 am

      @ Todd

      Renaissance led Europe to enslave Africans , not Christianity. 
      By the way , Renaissance disciples were also opposed to women’s rights and the Catholic Inquisition. 

      http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/saq/summary/v100/100.1quilligan.html

  73. Bahl Sanchin / Jan 23 2012 8:04 am

    How laughable. The only racists I know are rightwing Christians. Therefore all rightwing Christians are racists.

    See, My argument makes as much sense as yours. But please feel free to go on deluding yourself and pulling select pullquotes that you can pretend support your “thesis.”

    It’s funny to watch the pretzel logic that you wrap yourself into to maintain your theory. But as a theist, I’m sure you have a lot of practice at misinterpreting data while ignoring scad of other evidence in order to justify your childish beliefs. It’s probably the only thing you are really good at.

  74. Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 7:39 am

    “Theists split up into two catergorys: The stupid ones, and then fucking retarded ones”

  75. drenn1077 / Jan 23 2012 7:13 am

    This entire post has to be a joke. If not, it is very void of facts. Like many theists the writer claims victory while wallowing in defeat.

  76. rlh / Jan 23 2012 7:13 am

    Just when you think it couldn’t get any more retarded! This doesn’t even deserve a debate, because your little pea brain would implode on itself once reality bitch slaps you in the face. Oh my! Thank you for the comic relief on this rainy Monday morning.

  77. Rhett Samios / Jan 23 2012 7:12 am

    You equivocate geographically distinct with racially distinct. Not necessarily, or even generally true.

  78. itsnobody / Jan 7 2012 2:13 pm

    In conclusion I’m the undeniable winner of this debate!

    I’ve easily refuted all atheistic arguments here.

    All atheists have are logical fallacies (mostly argumentum ad hominems) they haven’t refuted any of my arguments.

    Anyone can read the comments and see that I’m the winner.

    All atheists have done is throw personal attacks and use other logical fallacies, but I guess since atheists are subhuman in terms of intelligence that should be expected.

    Why should I consider these people called “atheists” as human beings rather than subhuman beings?

    • christofero / Jan 23 2012 7:00 am

      consider all people, people. Dont be a twat because you think youre smarter than someone. That is usually a sign of shear stupidity. Which judging by your post, you get that pretty often:)

    • Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 7:13 am

      Your a horrible person, and i hope you die itsnobody 🙂 there, now you can believe all you want about atheists.

    • Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 8:04 am

      I find it quite amusing that although the main theme in your text is that all atheists are racist(see your own conclusion: “Such a disgusting low-life it is to be an atheist or a racist (it’s the same thing)). Yet in this comment you have separated humans from what you so nicely describe atheists as “subhuman beings”, denying that they even belong to the same species as you. Through this you have categorized different groups into different races, witch is the very core of racism. Hence by your own logic that racism=atheism either you are yourself a atheist or you must accept that all of your arguments are fundamentally wrong

      • Todd / Jan 23 2012 8:17 am

        Well said. You sire deserve a cookie!

    • Andrew / Feb 6 2012 12:35 am

      “Why should I consider these people called “atheists” as human beings rather than subhuman beings?”

      Irony FTW!

    • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 3:24 am

      I’m a demented fuckwit. I play with my testicles, and my sister’s testicles. Her’s are bigger than mine.

      I once met an ant. It was smarter than me. It was black. I met a termite, also called white ants. It was also smarter than me. It was a fucking racist ant.

      It was an ant-theist. When I am naughty my sister spanks me. My parents are brother and sister.

      The only sub-human around here is me. Did I mention I’m a fuckwit.

  79. Anonymous / Dec 30 2011 9:27 am

    For someone who expects (and calls out) logical fallacies in return to their post, you sure resort to a lot of logical fallacies and you have a tendency of merely stating that something is true, and then expecting that the reader just takes your word for it. I find that amusing. I find that completely and utterly hilarious.

    “Atheists are inherently hateful people and spend their entire life hating others. Atheists are unable to live peacefully side by side others. They seem to lack any kind of goodness, compassion or kindness. Atheists hate Blacks, Hispanics, Arabs, Jews, Christians, and Muslims. But what I’m really trying to find out is who do atheists hate most, Jews or Muslims?” The person who wrote that (without really backing it up, mind you) has absolutely no right to call out others for resorting to logical fallacies. Period.

    • itsnobody / Dec 31 2011 3:09 am

      lol I never used that as an argument so it’s irrelevant, I just used that as name-calling. I did however point out in these comments instances of atheist hating others. Search as much as you like, you’ll never find a group of people as hateful as atheists.

      Just look at what left-wing Swedes did to Jews – http://www.thelocal.se/24632/20100127/

      Pointing out that I said that and claiming that it means that I shouldn’t be able to point out logical fallacies is just an argumentum ad hominem or personal attack. How does name-calling disqualifying someone from pointing out logical fallacies? Your argument, just like all atheistic arguments doesn’t make sense.

      Name-calling doesn’t mean that someone shouldn’t be able to point out logical fallacies.

      The main reason why atheists don’t want me to point out their logical fallacies is because they don’t want their arguments to be exposed as flawed, wrong, and false.

      I guess it’s another easy argument for me to refute. All atheistic arguments are easy to refute since they arise from the subhuman atheist mind.

      Well I win again, as usual.

      • Jennifer Leigh Maginity / Jan 23 2012 10:04 am

        Douche. “I win”? Easy there, Charlie Sheen. You’re an idiot who knows absolutely nothing about atheism. I can’t believe people like you are allowed to breed.

      • Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 2:33 pm

        It’s not said anywhere in that article that it was the “left-wing Swedes” that harassed Jews. Look at Poland. It’s one of the most Christian(Catholic) countries in Europe, yet we have one of the highest anti-semitic rate in Europe. Your logic fails at every step.

      • Zak / Feb 6 2012 4:05 pm

        You aren’t pointing out any logical fallacies. You just make shit up, claim it is true, pronounce that you win and call it a day. Hate to break it to you, but that isn’t how it works.

        All the arguments you make are so fallacious as to call into question your competence. That may be a personal attack, but it is true.

    • Anonymous / Jan 23 2012 7:23 am

      Whoever wrote this is an ignorant fuck tard!!! I am not racist! Far from it! And ask yourselves this question oh holy innocent dumbass believers, have atheists ever wiped an entire nation of people for there good church like the Catholics? Have we ever killed millions or thousands based on religion? NO!!!!!!!! So stop trying to portray us as the bigots you ignorant judgmental scumbags who have no problem killing people based off religion or race as time and history has proved over and over and over and over again!

  80. BlackSpider2 / Nov 30 2011 9:49 am

    Exept the fact that Denmark, Sweden, Norway etc. aren’t racist… ‘-.- Your life is a joke really, if you’re taking this seriously, then you’re going to far by saying thatt ”all athiest should kill themselves.”

    • itsnobody / Dec 3 2011 4:04 pm

      Instead of giving actual reasons as to why they aren’t racist you just make the baseless statement that they aren’t.

      I already pointed out countless studies and events indicating that they are racist countries.

      I guess it’s the same low-life un-falsifiable atheist reasoning, you don’t want the racism in those countries to end so you try to intentionally lie and say that they aren’t racist, right?

      How many studies and racist events do I have to point out to show that Sweden is a low-life racist country?

      • Zak / Feb 6 2012 4:10 pm

        The US is a very religious country. Throughout most of our history religiosity, both public and private, were the norm. Yet the US was the home of the most hateful form of slavery ever known followed by persecution and segregation of the same group. This was all done using the Bible as a basis for both the slavery and the supposed subhuman nature of the “negro”.

        The country has become less religious over the same time that racist policies ended and racism as a whole has decreased. So increasing atheism in the US is correlated with decreasing racism. If only everybody were atheists, then nobody would be racist!

        Either that, or the two concepts are totally unrelated.

    • Brent Slensker / Jan 23 2012 8:25 am

      Those Nordic countries are THE LEAST racist people on Earth! They have been AMAZED for decades how poorly we treated Blacks! They laughed at America during movie documentaries that portrayed Jim Crow in the South! What a pile of moronic trash !

  81. itsnobody / Nov 8 2011 5:27 pm

    People have to realize what atheists are trying to do to society before it’s too late.

    Is there even a such thing as a non-racist atheist?

    I can only consider non-racist atheists as human beings.

    All of the atheists who have commented here agree with and support scientific racism. In the way same way that dog owners want to preserve the greyhound breed atheists want to preserve certain ethnic groups among humans. They believe that certain ethnic groups are more aggressive, more prone to crime, more intelligent, can run faster, etc….and by 2030 scientific racism should be universally accepted specifically BECAUSE of atheists and atheism.

    You have to realize that the reason why ALL regions with growing atheism also have growing racism is specifically because of atheism. Every region that atheists take over will immediately become nationalistic and racist.

    If no one says anything then atheists will take over and all atheist countries will become nationalistic and racist.

    Atheists are just the worst people, the lowest possible form of life. It is only up to Theists to end racism.

    You’ll never find an atheist opposing racism.

    • Anonymous / Nov 20 2011 12:46 am

      I oppose racism.

      This is the part where you say “liar.”

      That’s the part where I say “prove it.”

      After that, you say “prove yours first.”

      Then I ask “how?”

      Then you say “you can’t.”

      I say “okay.”

      So obviously this point is obviously not going to work.

      • Michael / Nov 27 2011 10:37 pm

        Actually, I already did. And he ignored it, rather then denying it.

      • itsnobody / Dec 3 2011 4:09 pm

        No you didn’t, all you did was claim that believing that certain races are genetically more or less intelligent isn’t really racism. What do you mean by ignoring or denying it?

        All of the atheists can give my comments thumbs down or whatever, but in the end that’s just an argument ad populum so I can care less

      • itsnobody / Dec 3 2011 4:05 pm

        Well then if you really oppose racism then go and tell your other low-life atheist friends to also oppose racism

        The main reason I wrote this article was to get atheists to oppose racism

        In the entire world there isn’t even one atheist country that isn’t a low-life atheist/racist/nationalist country

    • Zak / Feb 6 2012 4:18 pm

      “They believe that certain ethnic groups are more aggressive, more prone to crime, more intelligent, can run faster, etc”

      ooo, look at that fat straw man. The only person who said this here is you, and your quote mining.

      Noticing and studying difference between various groups of people is not racism. Treating other human beings differently is. If you took a step back from your quote mining you’d find that most of the people you quote (namely Dawkins) then go on to note that individual variation within human genealogical lines is greater than genetic drift. It’s why we can mate with one another.

      Also I think it is funny how you ignore all of the vocally anti-racist atheist bloggers on free-thought blogs. Crommunist comes to mind.

  82. Michael / Nov 1 2011 8:05 pm

    In conclusion….

    -Your above arguments are all invalid except that the majority of Sweden’s population may be atheist, but there is no actual way to prove it because the Church of Sweden’s Census is completely wrong.
    -You refuse to reply to my other arguments because you either 1. Agree with them or 2. refuse to accept them because you know it would destroy all basis for your argument and stop it from spreading misconceived illogical hate.
    -That your definition of racism is uncommon and needs to be specified in the article.

    • itsnobody / Nov 2 2011 12:18 am

      What arguments? You haven’t refuted even one claim I made.

      I on the other hand have refuted EVERY single claim you’ve made effortlessly.

      It’s quite obvious that I’m the undeniable winner of this debate by far.

      This entire time you’ve just agreed that you are racist and believe that certain races or ethnic groups are genetically more or less intelligent but some how try to label it as not racism….lol what a joke of an argument

      • Michael / Nov 3 2011 11:02 pm

        Why don’t you update your article to clarify when you use the uncommon definition of racism?
        You have not yet given evidence showing that Sweden is racist (in any way).
        You have not yet proven how much of the Sweden church is atheist or agnostic.

        There are many other points that can be refuted once you clarify when you use the uncommon and common definition of racism, such as atheists not disagreeing with Nazi racism.

      • itsnobody / Nov 8 2011 4:49 pm

        Why are you so delusional for?

        How is it the uncommon definition? Maybe in Canada believing that certain races are genetically more or less intelligent isn’t racism there or whatever but here that fits the COMMON definition of racism

        I’ve already proven that 15% of Sweden Church members identify themselves as atheists and that only 15% of Sweden Church members believe in Jesus, here’s the link again http://www.thelocal.se/34370/20110615/

        Using the “new” definition of atheism that atheist have of “lacking the belief in God” that means 85% of Sweden Church members are atheists

      • Michael / Nov 15 2011 7:54 pm

        racism
        “1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
        2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
        3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.” –http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racism

        This is quoted from a past comment that you said you use to define racism and its use in the above article.
        ‘usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others’ Therefore it’s UNUSUAL for the article to use racism to define atheists that do not believe certain races are superior and have the right to rule other races.
        This is what you need to clarify, because everyone will misinterpret you to be using the USUAL definition (like I did).
        ————
        Agnostic: 1. a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as God, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable, or that human knowledge is limited to experience.
        http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/agnostic
        Atheist: A person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.
        http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/atheist
        Those 85% of Sweden Church members could either be Atheist or Agnostic, and therefore you cannot say that the majority of Swedish people are racist, because there is no survey/ census clarifying which of the church members are one or the other.

        To clarify, Agnostic are those that don’t know if there is or isn’t a god, and atheists are those that know for certain that there is not a god. Even if they don’t believe in Jesus that doesn’t mean that they don’t believe in god. You can believe in god without believing in Jesus, or you could not know if there was a god without believing in Jesus. Hell, those people still registered under the Church of Sweden could be of any other religion that does no believe in Jesus.

        Please reply to all of the above arguments

      • Zak / Feb 6 2012 4:19 pm

        You have refuted nothing.

  83. itsnobody / Oct 11 2011 9:47 am

    In conclusion we can see from these comments that:
    – Atheists have agreed that they are racists
    – Atheists have intentionally refused to oppose racism
    – Atheists will continue to spread racism
    – Atheists attack anyone who criticizes racism

    You will never see any comment from atheists criticizing other racist atheists or racism in general or anything like that because atheists all agree with and support racism.

    People have to realize the truth that it’s not that some atheists are racists, but it’s that ALL atheists are racists except for some delusional non-white atheists who want to fit in with other white atheists.

    The main reason that atheists intentionally refuse to criticize racism in general, racist atheists, or racist atheist countries and instead celebrate racist atheists and racist atheist countries is specifically because they strongly agree with and support racism.

    You will see around 2030 or so there should be lots of nationalist/atheist countries.

    Such a great disgust it is to be an atheist, they are the lowest possible form of life. I don’t think society should consider racists/atheists as human beings.

    • Andrew / Feb 6 2012 12:43 am

      You are completely bugfuck insane. By your logic, to say that an African American is indeed an African American and not white is racist. Newsflash: different things are different.

      I’d also like to point out that the conjecture that populations from different genetic backgrounds have potentially different IQs suggests that they could be higher just as easily as they could be lower. You’re the one implying racism, and your argument says more about your state of mind and world view than anyone else’s.

      Atheists as a group have as much of a problem with racism and other forms of discrimination as any other social or cultural group. The difference is we acknowledge and deal with it. Any atheist who claims a position of skepticism but shows discriminatory attitudes is scorned and ridiculed. The two are not compatible.

    • Zak / Feb 6 2012 4:22 pm

      I started out nice, but I’m getting tired of it.

      – Atheists have agreed that they are racists

      No, we haven’t. But you ignore us and what we say because you are a biggoted fucktard. You got yourself a conclusion, and by golly you are sticking to it!

      – Atheists have intentionally refused to oppose racism

      No, we oppose racism. We also oppose idiots like you.

      – Atheists will continue to spread racism

      Go fuck yourself.

      – Atheists attack anyone who criticizes racism

      You wouldn’t know racism if it came up and tried to lynch you.

  84. Michael / Oct 7 2011 3:20 pm

    For some reason I have no reply option on your last comment.

    The second definition I gave is what is known as ‘Racism’, the first definition I gave was the concept of ‘nature vs nurture’. It is commonly thought to be a 50% – 50% ratio between the two, and it is evident because of many different reasons.
    http://genealogy.about.com/cs/geneticgenealogy/a/nature_nurture.htm

    ‘Apparently Africans aren’t as good in marathons’ This shows that you are not 100% in favour of nurture, but then again, you can’t exactly deny an observation.

    All that your above argument confirms is that some atheists are racist, many atheists don’t bother with objecting to racism, and that all atheists believe in a portion of the nature element. If you don’t agree with the above comment, please explain.

    PS: going off on a tangent, japan is in fact less than 2% atheist. just thought i would point it out. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2122.html F3 search japan (4th)

    • itsnobody / Oct 11 2011 3:31 am

      If most Japanese people aren’t atheists I guess it was just another lie thought up by atheists and propounded by atheist fan sites.

      Apparently you’re attempting to re-define the definition of racism again like how atheists want to re-define every other word. Both definitions are considered as racism to me.

      The fastest swimmer in the world – Not African
      Tallest recorded human – Not African
      World record discus thrower – Not African
      Fastest race walker – Not African
      World record 1500m progression – Not African

      It is just a myth that Africans are better athletes. Many don’t participate in athletic sports because it’s not in their culture or interest. Growing up I remember there were many people who could run fast who never participated in track and field or were interested in anything like that. Also many of the people who come close to African record holders are non-African.

      Atheists also don’t seem to understand some basics of modern DNA data.

      Africans are the most genetically diverse. An African Nigerian and an African San-Bushmen are more genetically distant from each other than a European German and an Asian Thai even though Bushmen and Nigerians are both ‘African’. In fact Nigerians and Bushmen are more genetically distant from each other than European Germans are from Koreans, Japanese, Thai, Chinese, Mongolians, Eskimos, Indonesians, or Native Americans.

      What this means is there is a smaller genetic difference between a European German and a Thai, Korean, Japanese, Chinese, Mongolian, Indonesian, Eskimo, or a N. Amerindian than there is between an African Nigerian and an African Bushmen. That is how genetically diverse Africa by itself is so it is not good to categorize all Africans as being even close to remotely the same genetically.

      So you basically agree that 100% of atheists are racists you just call it “nature vs. nurture” or whatever.

      • Michael / Oct 11 2011 9:33 pm

        Do you understand the point of a debate? Debates are used in order to sum up two different peoples ideas and adapt based on their results.

        You missed the boat, Good Job!

        When I was giving “Africans” as an example, it was not to discriminate against them, it was to show that people are different based upon their genetic origins. Through observation you can prove which ‘Geographic regions’ have traits that help them at different physical activities.

        Through this I was attempting to show you how it relates to the nature Vs. nurture argument, people preform based on both their ‘Geographic heritage’ and how they were taught. This is, that Africans, despite having ‘equal’ amounts of training preform better at 100m track run, NOT that they are better athletes.

        I would like to know where you got your definition of racism as being accepting of the above fact, because i got mine straight from the ‘Criminal Code of Canada’ (where I live).

        “Sections 318, 319, and 320 of the Code forbid hate propaganda.[3] “Hate propaganda” means “any writing, sign or visible representation that advocates or promotes genocide or the communication of which by any person would constitute an offence under section 319.”The Code defines genocide as the destruction of an “identifiable group.” The Code defines an “identifiable group” as “any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, ethnic origin or sexual orientation.”

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_Canada

        This is the only crime limiting racism in Canada.

        Therefore, it is hate speech to advocate or promote the genocide of a identifiable group, I.E. Race.

        Therefore, it is NOT hate speech to say that certain traits are common to certain races, and those traits improve there ability at the 100m run.

        This is the only crime limiting racism in Canada.

        The main question: Where do you get your definition of racism?

      • itsnobody / Oct 14 2011 6:11 pm

        Apparently you are confusing hate speech with racism.

        Here’s the definitions of racism:
        “1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
        2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
        3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.” – http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racism

        Now back to the other argument..Proving people have certain traits because of the geographical regions is not so simple because it could be for instance that someone runs faster because of heat or it could be that someone runs slower because of heat. In other words the same geographical regions can cause different things.

        What I was referring to was more concrete, it was actual DNA data. Categorizing all Africans as the same would be equivalent to categorizing Europeans, Arabs, Indians, East Asians, and Native Americans as the same since the genetic diversity in Africa is equivalent.

        As for Africans running faster. I’m not actually sure if this is true or not. East Asians have a population of over 1.5 billion.so there could be an East Asian who runs faster. But I don’t really know if East Asians are interested in running and athletics that much. Or if Africans really do run faster it wouldn’t really be Africans but only a certain ethnic group among Africans.

        Take for instance in dogs. The DNA distances in dogs are actually closer than in humans meaning there is less genetic diversity in dogs than in humans. Among dogs, the fastest dog breed is the Greyhound who also happens to be the 2nd fastest accelerating land animal in the entire world reaching 45 mph within 6 strides or less. But the average dog can only run 16-31 mph. It is interesting that even though all dogs are the same species and are very close genetically that the genetic differences in the Greyhound were such that they produced the 2nd fastest accelerating land animal in the entire world, even though the genetic distances among all dogs is extremely small. If Africans can run faster it would only be a certain ethnic group or breed among Africans and not all Africans in general so it’s not good to claim that “Africans” can run faster at all.

        So in conclusion to summarize your argument:
        – You agree that you’re a racist and believe that blacks as a whole are genetically inferior in terms of intelligence but don’t want to label that as racism and use Africans running faster as an example to justify scientific racism
        – You refused to answer if it would be very easy to justify nationalist/Nazi laws if scientific racism is accepted by all as scientific fact

        Well have fun being a racist/atheist. So far many atheists who have commented here have already agreed that they are racist….I wonder how many more atheists will come out and admit it

      • Michael / Oct 14 2011 10:15 pm

        Racism… ‘usually involving the idea that one’s own race is superior and has the right to rule others.’

        The problem with you calling people a racist is the vast majority will automatically associate that with discrimination and the above quote (key word usually, therefore people will associate racism with superiority). Whereas you have only proven to the unusual definition: ‘A belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement’.
        I only believe that traits – common to specific geographical regions – give the slight advantage for a very top echelon of athletic and possibly mental ability (since there is no conclusive evidence of this).
        As to the ‘African’ quote, i was just using ‘African’ so that i wouldn’t have to research all the specific geographical regions that the 100m runners originated.
        East Asians may very well be faster runners than the geographic region the 100m Olympic runners originated, but that would prove my point; that one group is better at running the 100m. What we can deduce is that the set geographic region of current 100m runners has a trait common in its gene pool that allow them to run faster than other geographic groups, that do compete in the 100m run.

        I absolutely agree. You cannot justify Nazi morals if ‘racism’ is proven, because these traits do not affect the specific groups enough to prove them inhuman or even inferior. People who look and act differently have emotions the same as everyone else, and if these Nazis would drop their bias long enough to understand people of other races, they would realize the other race’s humanity and similarity to themselves.
        The reason why, despite geographic regions, the greyhound preforms better at running is because they have been selectively bred in order to produce the highest possible results. This could also work for any other species.
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_breeding

        All I am trying to say is that human traits originate in secluded populations, which may or may not give them an advantage at anything (though it is very slight). However, some traits cause the holder to survive long enough to pass on that trait. This is why it is likely that a secluded population would have advantageous traits spread throughout the population, and these traits would affect many members of the race.
        There is no legal or moral complication in your uncommon definition of racism in Canada.

        Correct me if I am wrong, but it appears to me that you are associating atheists with a very loose definition of racism, one that does not ‘usually’ occur. The problem with this is that most of your audience will mistake this definition with the more commonly used one, which is to discriminate against others of different race. It would be most kind if you would include the aforementioned definition and specify which it applies to.

        The rest of your idea that atheist are racist is just speculation.
        For example:
        ‘I saw this atheist group at the university I attend, everyone there was white, the place was like a white supremacy organization. Liberal white atheists have whites-only friends, listen to whites-only music, watch whites-only TV shows, and hang out with whites-only. They must want it to become like a whites-only type of society.’ Did you bother to ask if non-white people could join? If not, speculation.
        ‘Whenever forced to decide what’s more important: religion or race? The racist will always choose race above all.’ This is a false statement, I specifically believe that your religion in life is the most important thing, because it defines many of your morals and beliefs, and should therefore be chosen very carefully. Whereas race is less important, since it only affects a first impression. This is due to bias, prejudice, and stereotypes, which I try to avoid. (I.e. in my first impression with an ‘African’ I will not automatically assume that he is a 100m runner).

        ‘Atheists have remained completely silent on the issue of racism. When atheists talk about morals they seem to intentionally leave out discussing racism. I’ve heard atheists speak out against lots of things but racism is not one of those things. I’ve heard lots of other Theist groups speak out against racism and condemn racism, but I’ve never heard even one atheist speak out against racism. Where are all the videos on YouTube of atheists condemning racism or even mentioning or acknowledging that racist atheists exist? It’s easy to find theists speaking out against racism, but extraordinarily difficult to find any atheist condemning racism. I can only find atheists criticizing and accusing Theists of being racist but I cannot find atheists criticizing racism in general or criticizing other atheists for being racist.’
        This further proves my above point: Atheists believe religion is important, so they comment on it (look on youtube, you will see). Where as they do not believe that racism is important, so they don’t bother to make video’s against it. In other words, in order for your second statement to be true, your first statement would also need to be true.

        – Sweden – 87% lutherian , (none atheist)
        – New Zealand – 32% no religion, agnostic or atheist or other
        – Norway – Church of Norway 85% with less than 1 % atheist
        – Denmark – Evangelical Lutheran 95%, none atheist
        – Latvia – 63% unspecified (meaning they dont care about religion, so they are obviously not atheist, or else they would specify atheist)
        – Japan – already talked about this
        – Russia (recently rising in atheism) – Orthodox 15-20%, Muslim 10-15%, other Christian 2%, though this is only practicing believers so you cannot get a definite result
        – Netherlands – 42% none, agnostic or atheist or other
        – Czech Republic – unaffiliated 59%
        As you can see above, according to the CIA’s World Fact book (which is a credible source) none of the countries you specified are actually majority atheist (>50%). Therefore all of your following (light) evidence and derogatory terms are associated with the above religions, and not atheism.
        https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2122.html
        Also, Sections 318, 319, and 320 in the Criminal Code of Canada clearly define Hate speech as spreading hate against religion, and you were trying to spread hate and misinformation of atheists by associating them with the commonly used definition of racism, which was unfounded according to the above arguments.
        Lastly (this is getting long…) the problem with the format of your article is that you base each statement dependent upon the previous one. So that if one of those statements turns out to be wrong, you lose all bases for your following statements.

        Conclusion:
        -you used the term racism in the correct definition but in the uncommon one, it would be nice for you to clarify so that people do not misinterpret.
        -None of your factual basis for associating atheists with the commonly used definition of racism is correct.
        -In Canada you have – potentially – legally preformed a hate crime with this article.
        -Next time you write an article, try a more stable format so your entire opinion is not based on potentially factually unsound statements.

      • itsnobody / Oct 14 2011 11:34 pm

        Wow your arguments are so boring and also a joke.

        As for your statistics they’re even weaker.

        Sweden is not 87% Lutheran, it’s a 77% atheist according to the 2005 Eurobarometer poll. The Lutheran numbers are based upon Church member lists, the only problem is that in Sweden many people who are listed as members of the Lutheran Church are actually atheists, so the member listings are not accurate.

        The same goes for Denmark, Russia, and many other countries.

        The CIA’s data on religion has been criticized for being notoriously wrong and inaccurate in many cases.

        As for your other arguments you basically agreed that you’re a racist so I hope you and all your other low-life bitch of an atheist racist friends just stop being racist or commit suicide

        Such a disgusting low-life it is to be an atheist, there is not one atheist who’s commented here who ever has nor ever will denounce racism.

        So here’s a summary of your arguments:
        – Weak/false statistics
        – Agreeing that you’re a racist
        – Agreeing that atheists refuse to speak out against racism because they don’t strongly disagree with racism (like how they disagree with Intelligent Design or Creationism)

      • Michael / Oct 15 2011 3:29 pm

        Could you quote a quantitative # of sources that denounce the CIA world fact book’s accuracy?

        Sweden is: 23% i believe in god, 53% i believe there is some sort of spirit or life source, or 23% i don’t believe there is any sort of spirit or life force
        The sample population was 1023. The 76% that you have mentioned could very well be agnostic or atheist, the below argument will prove which of these 76% are atheist, and which are agnostic.

        The CIA world fact book’s accuracy comes from what the church of Sweden has published. However, since the country and religion separated in 2000 only 20% have chosen to leave the church. Since Atheists care so much about their religious beliefs they would immediately leave the church, and it would then update its facts. That means that only 20% of those who left are ‘true’ atheists (atheist that believe religion is important), the rest who do not practice religious beliefs and that have not updated their status with the church would be more properly defined as Agnostic.

        ‘Even a dog is treated better than a non-white male in liberal atheist countries like Sweden and Denmark. The racism in liberal atheist countries is nothing like the racism in the US which is limited to things like racist jokes/slurs in private, the police targeting certain races, and some isolated incidences.’
        And
        ‘The racism in liberal atheist countries for non-white males is just daily everyday racism, being intentionally ignored, given angry stares everywhere you go, not being allowed to enter bars/clubs/restaurants, not getting hired for a job, and also racial slurs/jokes, the police targeting certain races, and racist incidences.’
        Because i believe people of the same religion have different opinions outside of religion (specifically agnostic and atheist) I would like to defend the agnostic Swedish population’s opinion. Could you give me a quantitative # of specific examples where this does happen? I also don’t believe that this will make a difference, because the newspapers may or may not choose to report on racist activities. Therefore no matter what nation you are in, there is no way to specify how a nation acts without personal firsthand experience of mass (commonly used definition) racism. Or a census of the entire population, that would work too (no reason to lie, since no-one will know how you answered).

        Since you did not update your article and specify that you used the word ‘racist’ with its uncommon definition I will assume that the entire purpose of your article was to spread false information and hate when the target audience misinterprets your article. If this is untrue, please explain.

        Again, Atheists do strongly disagree with the commonly used definition of the word ‘racism’; however we do not believe it is as important as other topics we strongly disagree with, so we don’t bother to publicly strongly disagree with it.
        Hell for all i know, maybe some atheist did strongly disagree with the commonly used definition of the word ‘racism’. But when he/she disagreed with it, it never occurred to them that their religion was at all important. This is because Atheism is unregulated, and inclusive. There is no governing atheist body that dictates our specific beliefs, or regulates who can become atheist or not. Therefore someone who is atheist does not disagree with another atheist, as an atheist, because they do not believe that their religion dictates their opinion. Instead they disagree as someone with a different opinion.
        For example, if I were to create a YouTube video against racism, I would not specify in the title ‘atheists against (discriminatory) racism’ instead i would say ‘Why (discriminatory) racism is wrong’.

        ‘Such a disgusting low-life it is to be an atheist, there is not one atheist who’s commented here who ever has nor ever will denounce racism.’
        I did…
        ‘I absolutely agree. You cannot justify Nazi morals if ‘racism’ is proven, because these traits do not affect the specific groups enough to prove them inhuman or even inferior. People who look and act differently have emotions the same as everyone else, and if these Nazis would drop their bias long enough to understand people of other races, they would realize the other race’s humanity and similarity to themselves.’
        Or did you mean the uncommon definition of racism? This is just getting confusing.

      • itsnobody / Oct 18 2011 5:13 pm

        lol…why are you in denial for?

        Just because something comes from the CIA World fact book doesn’t mean it’s accurate…you’re just using an appeal to authority.

        The CIA is notoriously inaccurate when it comes to religion and Sweden specifically. It’s statistics are based upon Church members. The majority of Swedes who are atheists haven’t removed themselves from the member list so the data is quite inaccurate. The reason the member list is still so high is because people haven’t tried to remove themselves from the list and because until 1996 church membership was inherited from the parents (so people were listed simply because their parents were).

        We know with 100% certainty that the CIA data is inaccurate because it claims Sweden is 87% Lutheran even though undeniable concrete data shows that in 2011 only 73% of Swedes are listed as Church members now and only 6% of Church members attend Church once per month.

        See http://www.thelocal.se/34370/20110615/#

        You’re just plain wrong. Among Church members in Sweden only 15% actually believe in Jesus. As for your sample size argument sample sizes don’t need to cover 100% of the population to be accurate. All the other data clearly confirms the Eurobarometer data.

        If you don’t believe me you can visit any number of atheist web sites they’ll all tell you Sweden is DEFINITELY an atheist country or you can actually talk to Swedes.

        There are Christian Swedes, they are just rare now.

      • Michael / Oct 18 2011 6:51 pm

        did you not read my argument?
        Atheists believe religion is important, so they would be the 27% of people who have since 1996 stated that they are no longer a member of the lutherian religion. Those who do not think religion is important would not bother with leaving the church. Therefore, those 67% who have not yet bothered to proclaim their leaving the church are actually Agnostic. And even then, it doesn’t matter whether or not Sweden is atheist, because you have yet to quote a quantitative number of sources that prove Sweden is racist!
        What about my other points? Since you do not bother to reply, i have to assume that you think that they are correct.
        Therefore you are using this article to promote hate. If you do not understand, reread my last reply.
        sigh*

      • itsnobody / Oct 24 2011 12:25 am

        lol what a loser I’ve already destroyed your argument about Sweden not being an atheist country so why are you still in denial for?

        Your reasoning as to why people would formally leave the Lutheran Church is so broken.

        Someone can be an atheist in Sweden and not bother to remove their name from the member list because they are too lazy to or don’t really care. This is proven by the fact that only 15% of Sweden Church members believe in Jesus and 15% of Sweden Church members identify themselves as atheists….if your reasoning was correct then why do 15% of CHURCH MEMBERS in Sweden claim they are atheist?

        So that argument has been destroyed and now you’re questioning whether or not Sweden is a racist country.

        Apparently nothing can be considered as evidence that Sweden is a low-bitch of an atheist/racist country to atheist. Any evidence provided they will say “I don’t consider it as evidence” but apparently anything can be considered as evidence that the US or any other religious country is racist.

        If you want evidence for racism in Sweden I can provide studies, racist events, racist laws, racist shootings, racist parties, and more for Sweden. But with the unfalsifiable atheistic reasoning they will just say “this is not considered as evidence”.

      • Michael / Nov 1 2011 8:00 pm

        I would REALLY like all the evidence you can come up with, at that point I will debate whether or not that evidence is valid or not. This is all part of convincing someone of your opinion, if you do not wish to convince someone that your logic is valid then don’t make the article in the first place.

        You ignored my valid arguments, i have to assume that All aspects of your article are invalid because you refused to deny my claims (possibly because you agree with them).

      • itsnobody / Nov 2 2011 12:18 am

        I’ve already posted all the evidence and refuted ALL of your claims.

        Which claim did you make that is unrefuted?

      • Michael / Nov 3 2011 10:58 pm

        Please give me evidence that Sweden is Racist. You have not yet linked any sources. I have yet to see one single link to an article or fact-book or census that shows any evidence towards proving that Sweden is racist.

        ——————–

        that your definition of racism is uncommon and needs to be specified in the article so that no misunderstandings occur.

        —————–
        From before, something you ignored
        “Again, Atheists do strongly disagree with the commonly used definition of the word ‘racism’; however we do not believe it is as important as other topics we strongly disagree with, so we don’t bother to publicly strongly disagree with it.
        Hell for all i know, maybe some atheist did strongly disagree with the commonly used definition of the word ‘racism’. But when he/she disagreed with it, it never occurred to them that their religion was at all important. This is because Atheism is unregulated, and inclusive. There is no governing atheist body that dictates our specific beliefs, or regulates who can become atheist or not. Therefore someone who is atheist does not disagree with another atheist, as an atheist, because they do not believe that their religion dictates their opinion. Instead they disagree as someone with a different opinion.
        For example, if I were to create a YouTube video against racism, I would not specify in the title ‘atheists against (discriminatory) racism’ instead i would say ‘Why (discriminatory) racism is wrong’.”

        ——————
        I would still like a clarification on the below statement

        ‘I absolutely agree. You cannot justify Nazi morals if ‘racism’ is proven, because these traits do not affect the specific groups enough to prove them inhuman or even inferior. People who look and act differently have emotions the same as everyone else, and if these Nazis would drop their bias long enough to understand people of other races, they would realize the other race’s humanity and similarity to themselves.’
        Or did you mean the uncommon definition of racism? This is just getting confusing.

        —————-
        Please respond to all arguments above, thank you.

      • itsnobody / Nov 8 2011 5:17 pm

        Ok time to snap you out of your delusion

        Here’s some studies on racism in Sweden:
        http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ694844&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ694844
        http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/routledg/swom/2003/00000011/00000002/art00004
        http://202.198.141.51/upload/soft/0-article/+00000001/022.pdf
        http://www.nuorisotutkimusseura.fi/julkaisuja/virtanen/2/2.html
        http://cms.horus.be/files/99935/MediaArchive/Racist%20Violence%20Sweden%20-online.pdf
        http://www.rijo.homepage.t-online.de/pdf/EN_EU_ZE_racism.pdf

        Here are some recent racist events that occurred in Sweden:
        http://www.thelocal.se/24632/20100127/
        http://www.theweek.co.uk/politics/10525/dark-skinned-swedes-live-fear-racist-gunman?lost=1
        http://www.thelocal.se/33290/20110419/
        http://www.thelocal.se/36084/20110912/
        http://www.thelocal.se/37194/20111107/

        The rest of your arguments are just agreeing with me so I don’t really know what you mean by respond to them. You just agreed that you believe certain races are genetically more or less intelligent and you agreed that atheists don’t care to speak out against racism

        Such a disgusting low-life it is to be a Swede, they are among the worst people, the lowest possible form of life. How can anyone drop lower than an atheist?

      • Michael / Nov 15 2011 8:35 pm

        I read your references and can conclude that Sweden’s history of racism is very strong, and that the government needs to give more surveys clarifying.
        You are right, Sweden is Racist.

        The other arguments were pointing out flaws in your article that were allowing you to put in more derogatory terms, since you agree with my arguments against those flaws I would like you to remove those points from your article.

        specifically

        “Atheists have remained completely silent on the issue of racism. When atheists talk about morals they seem to intentionally leave out discussing racism. I’ve heard atheists speak out against lots of things but racism is not one of those things. I’ve heard lots of other Theist groups speak out against racism and condemn racism, but I’ve never heard even one atheist speak out against racism. Where are all the videos on YouTube of atheists condemning racism or even mentioning or acknowledging that racist atheists exist? It’s easy to find theists speaking out against racism, but extraordinarily difficult to find any atheist condemning racism. I can only find atheists criticizing and accusing Theists of being racist but I cannot find atheists criticizing racism in general or criticizing other atheists for being racist.”

        and

        “There are only two possible explanations for atheists remaining silent on the issue of racism:
        – Atheists don’t disagree strongly enough with racism to say anything
        – Atheists agree with and support racism
        When people strongly disagree with something they speak up and say something, but atheists have remained completely silent in opposition to racism. Just utterly silent.

        Atheists all seem to live in a fantasy world where they only think that religious people in the South of the US are racist when in reality 100% of atheist countries are racist. Whenever confronted with atheists being racist all atheists do is change the subject to claiming that Theists are racists, refuse to acknowledge that any racist atheists exist or condemn and criticize other atheists for being racist, or even worse just agree that they support racism.”

        If you do not understand the corelation between my previous comment and the above statements from the article please reread the argument and explain the problem.

      • Michael / Nov 15 2011 8:37 pm

        I read your references and can conclude that Sweden’s history of racism is very strong, and that the government needs to give more surveys clarifying.
        You are right, Sweden is Racist.

        The other arguments were pointing out flaws in your article that were allowing you to put in more derogatory terms, since you agree with my arguments against those flaws I would like you to remove those points from your article.

        specifically

        “Atheists have remained completely silent on the issue of racism. When atheists talk about morals they seem to intentionally leave out discussing racism. I’ve heard atheists speak out against lots of things but racism is not one of those things. I’ve heard lots of other Theist groups speak out against racism and condemn racism, but I’ve never heard even one atheist speak out against racism. Where are all the videos on YouTube of atheists condemning racism or even mentioning or acknowledging that racist atheists exist? It’s easy to find theists speaking out against racism, but extraordinarily difficult to find any atheist condemning racism. I can only find atheists criticizing and accusing Theists of being racist but I cannot find atheists criticizing racism in general or criticizing other atheists for being racist.”

        and

        “There are only two possible explanations for atheists remaining silent on the issue of racism:
        – Atheists don’t disagree strongly enough with racism to say anything
        – Atheists agree with and support racism
        When people strongly disagree with something they speak up and say something, but atheists have remained completely silent in opposition to racism. Just utterly silent.

        Atheists all seem to live in a fantasy world where they only think that religious people in the South of the US are racist when in reality 100% of atheist countries are racist. Whenever confronted with atheists being racist all atheists do is change the subject to claiming that Theists are racists, refuse to acknowledge that any racist atheists exist or condemn and criticize other atheists for being racist, or even worse just agree that they support racism.”

        If you do not understand the correlation between my previous comment and the above statements from the article please reread the argument and explain the problem.

  85. itsnobody / Oct 5 2011 9:47 pm

    Since atheists intentionally refuse to criticize racism in general or racist atheists or racist atheist countries it would just be better for all atheists to die off or commit suicide.

    People have to realize the truth that it’s not that some white atheists are racist, but rather it’s that ALL white atheists are racist.

    Racists all around the world should just organize a suicide party and get together and commit suicide. Imagine how much racism would end.

    Or if that doesn’t happen hopefully some kind of natural disaster will just kill every single racist off.

    I would wish that atheists would stop being racist, but is that even possible?

    Having known many atheists in the US I know they are all the same, united in the same racist hatred as the liberal atheists in liberal atheist countries. It’s as if atheists are a pure incarnation of evil itself, spreading hatred and racism where ever they are.

    All the countries and regions that atheists are taking over are rising in racism. France, Russia, and The Netherlands will quickly become nationalist after atheists take them over. Australia will become similar to NZ in racism and if atheists take over Canada it will also become racist.

    By 2030 or so when atheists take over, there should be lots of atheist/racist/nationalist societies, unless of course someone stops it.

    I can try to attempt to end racism by constantly criticizing racists and racism.

    • Liam / May 3 2013 8:42 pm

      Really you realize something right. Atheist is a really broad demographic and there is no set rules. I’m an atheist and im the least racist person in my group of friends and the rest of them are Catholic. One in particular a particularly strong catholic thinks women should have no rights, that homosexuals are the devil, he regularly uses racial slurs. Though if im not mistaken you are one hell of a hypocrite because you are extremely racist against atheists so why are you calling them atheists?

    • Liam / May 3 2013 8:43 pm

      Really you realize something right. Atheist is a really broad demographic and there is no set rules. I’m an atheist and im the least racist person in my group of friends and the rest of them are Catholic. One in particular a particularly strong catholic thinks women should have no rights, that homosexuals are the devil, he regularly uses racial slurs. Though if im not mistaken you are one hell of a hypocrite because you are extremely racist against atheists so why are you calling them racists?

      • Yves / May 3 2013 9:56 pm

         
         I’m an atheist and im the least racist person in my group of friends.  

        It is highly improbable that you have rarely heard atheists saying racial slurs ; most atheists I met have claimed they are not racist persons , but they all lied. The same atheists I know were happy when Haiti was ravaged by an earthquake. They also are glad about what is going on in Syria hoping that Arabs will kill themselves in a civil war. They also hope that Arabs and Jewish will soon disappear in a bloody nuclear war. In Europe, atheists were also not unhappy when the World Trade Center twin towers collapsed because atheists hate the USA. Atheists were really not sad about the 9/11 events.

        Also, I recently heard that none of them truly believe it is not a big deal to rape a non-White girl. 

        Atheists have not much morality than nazis ; if they come to power the world will be a gigantic concentration camps. 
         

  86. Michael / Oct 5 2011 3:14 am

    What do you mean by racist? that people who believe that there are physical differences in people whose ancestors come from different parts of the world are racist? or that discriminating based upon someones physical traits makes you racist?
    If its the first 1 I can say that there is proof in the 100 meter run in the olympics, you will notice a sharp ratio between people of African race and those of other race. This is also apparent in many other sports. And if people can be physically more endowed, why can’t they be mentally?

    If you believe that discriminating based on someones physical traits makes you racist see the Klue Klux Klan, that was created by religious people. Also, i stand as evidence that I do not (as an atheist) discriminate based on racial differences. My group of friends at high-school (above average grades) is composed of German, Polish, Chinese, British, Czech, and a son of a (preacher?). We all have largely varying religious beliefs, and not once in the 4 years i have known them has any of us discriminated based on how the others look.
    What we argue the most about is religious and political beliefs, which seems to be much more important than my Chinese friends tilted eyes, or the fact that he gets better marks (which may be due to cultural differences rather than race).

    You mentioned that atheists tend to not make counter racism youtube videos, consider this: The reason I have not made a youtube video against racism is because i don’t want to draw attention to how some people believe how you look makes you less human than someone else. It also does not justify discrimination, why explain that it is wrong when it is obvious that everyone i have met knows its wrong. For more clarification see South Park ‘Chef goes nanners’, you will see what I mean.

    Also please do not prejudice against me for watching South Park, the best part of the show is the morals it teaches.

    At first i thought that this was satire, see ‘A Modest Proposal’ by Jonathan Swift.

    Thank you for your time.

    • itsnobody / Oct 5 2011 9:06 pm

      lol….what a joke

      So you’re basically agreeing that support scientific racism like all your other low-life atheist friends.

      About the KKK there are many Theists who acknowledge and speak out against the KKK, Christian Identity, and basically every other religiously-connected racist group. So many Theists speak out that this has caused many KKK or ex-KKK members to become atheists.

      Then you agreed that atheists intentionally refuse to condemn racism simply because they don’t want to “draw attention”. In other words you don’t want racists or racist atheists to be criticized because you want the racism to continue and go on, isn’t this true?

      Even a dog is treated better than a non-white male in most liberal atheist countries and your only response is “I don’t want to draw attention” wtf? I guess Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks shouldn’t spoke up because that would’ve drew attention.

      Because of low-life atheists like yourself perhaps I should make some new articles called “Why atheists shouldn’t be considered as human beings, but instead subhuman beings” and “Why atheists should just commit suicide”

      • Michael / Oct 6 2011 3:14 pm

        So you do not agree that African’s are physically superior than non-African peoples? Do you have an empirical data ( data produced by an experiment or observation) against the evidence via the 100meter Olympic results? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/100_metres#World_Championship_medalists

        Which racist definition did you choose?
        That people who believe that there are physical differences in people whose ancestors come from different parts of the world are racist? Or that discriminating based upon someones physical traits makes you racist?

        PLEASE SPECIFY THIS TIME

      • itsnobody / Oct 6 2011 10:46 pm

        So you’re again agreeing that you support scientific racism by attempting to compare it with the speed that Africans can run at? I don’t believe that Africans are physically superior or whatever. Many of the runners on that list aren’t pure sub-Saharan Africans so you can’t really say all Africans. Also why did you just choose the 100m for? Apparently Africans aren’t as good in marathons. Also among Africans there is lots of genetic diversity and there are many other factors involved in who wins competitions. A Nigerian and an Ethiopian are not genetically the same. Also the speed at which someone can run is much more objective than measuring intelligence.

        Well at least you agree that you’re a disgusting low-life racist unlike many other atheists. You will see as this article grows in popularity more and more atheists will show their true disgusting nature and just admit that they are racist. People have to realize what’s happening to society before it’s too late and atheists/racists take over.

        You will see next atheists will instead being arguing things like “What’s wrong with being a nationalist?” or “What’s wrong with being a racist” or “We’re just trying to preserve the race and culture” and things like that.

        So then do you agree that it would be very easy to justify nationalist/Nazi laws when atheists/racists take over and most of the world accepts scientific racism as scientific fact?

        As for the definition of racism I’m going by either (meaning either definition would constitute as racism).

  87. itsnobody / Sep 30 2011 3:34 pm

    In conclusion atheists never have and never will make any attempt to end racism. It is only up to Theists.

    There is no way that I believe certain races are genetically smarter or less intelligent like atheists do.

    All that matters to atheists is hierarchically ranking groups based on IQ. As soon as a country accepts scientific racism, that certain ethnic groups are less intelligent, more prone to crime, more aggressive, more athletic, etc…justifying anti-immigration and nationalist views is very easy. This is what’s happening in liberal atheist countries like Sweden and the Netherlands.

    Theists will always speak out against racism, regardless of if it’s Theists or atheists being racist. Atheists will continue to refuse to even acknowledge that racist atheists even exist and intentionally refuse to criticize racism in general and other racist atheists.

    What a great burden this Jewish-based religion called “Christianity” has been to the white race.

    “Christianity has always been deleterious to our race, and if the Roman Empire had to succumb to an imported religion, one could wish in retrospect that the victor in the competition for political power had been the Mithraic cult, which was at least manly and which the Christians so closely emulated in many matters, though not in its virtues.” – White Nationalist, Professor Revilo P. Oliver

    To all the atheists reading this I sincerely hope you and all your low-life racist friends just stop being racist or die off.

    Of course, I still have a plan to destroy racism…

    • Ian / Feb 23 2014 6:45 pm

      Are these the same theists that caused the Crusades, or WW1 or WW2 or the Afghanistan War (before the US involvement) and numerous other conflicts? I am guessing that your plan to destroy racism is to get rid of people. I find it amusing that religious types always accuse atheists of being racists but when you hear them preach – there is only one God (and it happens to be theirs) – death to the infidels (Muslims) or we must convert them to our way of thinking (Christians). The world would be a lot better place if people just had whatever faith (or lack of it) and kept it to themselves and left everyone else alone. I am an atheist and I live in a community that has lots of Christians and lots of Muslims (I know this because they wear crosses or hijabs) and I have lived in China and Australia and I am happy for all of them to share the country as long as they don’t try and force anything on me as I certainly don’t want to force anything on them as I have nothing to force! I don’t like how my country forced things on to our original inhabitants, the aboriginals but that can’t be changed now.

      • itsnobody / Mar 3 2014 12:48 am

        If you’re an atheist, then to me you’re not really a human being, but instead fully subhuman.

        The crap you said about things Theists did in the past that were bad well what about:
        – Estonia, the most atheistic country, has consistently the highest murder rate or one of the highest murder rates in Europe year after year
        – North Korea, an officially atheist state has the highest murder rate in East Asia
        – Jim Jones, an atheist did the second largest mass killing in US history
        – Stalin, an atheist killed at least 10 million people

        LOL, what a joke, an atheist world = a racist, disgusting, nasty nationalist world

        And 100% of the responses here continue to re-confirm that.

        So I’m done with responding on this article unless people have anything new or constructive to say.

      • Peter / Mar 3 2014 1:01 am

        Atheists are in fact more human than most religious types. Saying atheists arn’t human is by far the dumbest thing I have ever heard. You would get creamed in a proper debate with an atheist mate. I dare you to ring up atheist experience and have this out with them it will be hilarious watching you get crushed.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 3:29 pm

        You think it’s bad to claim that atheists are subhuman for being racist because you want the racism to continue?

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 4:01 pm

        I am still curious as to what is so racist. an atheist is simply a person that doesnt believe in a deity it has nothing to do with race at all. It was due to extremely violent christians that the crusades happened you know 100’s of 1000’s of people butchered for nothng

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 4:06 pm

        I already explained in high details, you didn’t understand because you’re subhuman in terms of intelligence.

        You did the exact same thing I predicted, just changing the subject to making Theists look bad in order to avoid how nasty and low-acting atheists are.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 4:22 pm

        you explained that atheists are racist because we supposably believe that all races are different and even though 99% of every human on earth will admit this to be true i guess its just atheists that can’t say it huh. Again another child insult trying to say that im trying to make atheists lookk good and theists look bad but the evidence is there atheists are not bad in general nither are religious people just embarrassing kids like you that should be doing his home work rather than being on here trolling and making an idiot of himself and of religious people.

      • itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 5:22 pm

        lol, your comments just show how dense and idiotic you are.

        He shoved his hand up so far up his own dick up Richard Dawkin’s own pussy that he can’t think clearly.

        Let me explain slowly on how the atheist population DIRECTLY causes racism/nationalism/Nazism to prevail so that even the lowest of the low, the nastiest of the nasty, the worst of all subhuman beings (you) can understand:
        – The belief in evolution, natural selection, and that the brain is the mind directly supports racism and ethnic nationalism
        – The atheist population directly CAUSES there to be no opposition towards racism/nationalism/Nazism since there aren’t any mainstream Christian denominations that accept WN or Nazism

        What I’ve stated are really all proven facts, that’s why all you have in response is lame personal attacks.

      • Peter / Mar 9 2014 5:32 pm

        natural selection?
        why are homo sapiens and homo erectus extinct for then hmmm
        oh lemme guess they never existed there just scientific lies
        but you are so wrong what you have stated is not fact its a retarded teenage kids way of thinking. how does natural selection have anything to do with racism so for the fact that neanderthals are extinct makes us racist?
        common man get a clue this shit is hilarious but you can’t be taken seriously. In fact I might stick this on my facebook page so my son and friends can see it it’ll be free comedy for them/

  88. itsnobody / Sep 30 2011 11:47 am

    Since atheists or racists refuse to stop being racist it would just be better for the world if they all died off.

    I hope that an earthquake or some kind of natural disaster just comes one day and kills off every single racist.

    You will see not one atheist will comment denouncing racism…why? Because they either don’t disagree with racism strongly enough to denounce it or they agree with and support racism.

    Rather than voicing any opposition to racism all atheists will do is:
    – Continue to celebrate racist/atheist biologists
    – Continue to celebrate atheist/racist countries
    – Continue to use Richard Lynn as a source to claim atheists are smarter and superior
    – Intentionally refuse to criticize any other racist atheists
    – Intentionally refuse to criticize racism in general
    – Attack Theists like me who criticize atheists for being racist

    People have to realize what’s happening to society. Every region atheists take over will become racist and nationalistic, and no atheist will ever dare open up their mouth voicing opposition to racism.

    It would just be better for mankind if 100% of racists/atheists just died off all of a sudden. Hopefully an earthquake or some natural disaster will come and kill off every single racist in Sweden, New Zealand, Denmark, or any other racist/atheist country.

    Since atheists refuse to make any attempt to end racism it is up to Theists sand Theists alone. Only Theists will attempt to end racism.

    Let all those who oppose racism speak up, and let those who either don’t disagree strongly with racism or agree with racism let their silence be an indicator of their support of racism.

    “Christian Identity” followers constantly have to defend themselves from other Christians. Atheist White Nationalists on the other hand NEVER have to defend themselves from other atheists.

    What a great thing it would be if 100% of racists just stopped being racist or died off.

    Such a disgusting low-life it is to be an atheist, they are the very very very very very very very very lowest possible form of life.

  89. kathi / Sep 30 2011 8:23 am

    hi,

    I would like to ask something about the Dawkins-quote. I don’t see how Dawkins’ quote would meet the definition of racism. can you explain that? what is your definition of racism? he says:
    – there is a connection between brain size and intelligence
    – intelligence has something to do with genes
    – genes act probably in a way we would call fascist

    I suppose he doesn’t make his statements without reason. Also he doesn’t say intelligence makes people superior to others.

    Anyway, I don’t support the statements by Lynn or Watson.

    • itsnobody / Sep 30 2011 11:30 am

      Dawkin’s quote simply implies racism. He has also defended James D. Watson several times.

      If brain size and intelligence are connected to genes then they are most likely connected to race as well. It only takes a little step further to interpret Dawkin’s quote as racist.

      There is very little difference in claiming that someone “is less intelligent” versus “inferior in terms of intelligence”….it’s just atheist semantics

      So if it is found out to be a scientific fact that brain size varies from “race” to race then Dawkin’s quote obviously supports racism.

      Brain size being connected to intelligence is also the basis of Lynn’s book “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis”

      • kathi / Sep 30 2011 1:30 pm

        >> Dawkin’s quote simply implies racism.
        No it doesn’t.

        >> He has also defended James D. Watson several times.
        If you make an factual statement please give a source.

        >> If brain size and intelligence are connected to genes then they are most likely connected to race as well.
        You say ‘most likely’. You admit you don’t know that what claim as a fact is actually true. Are you serious?

        There is no unique definition of ‘intelligence’ in psychology. A number of intelligence-models do exist (Spearman, Cattels, Thurstone,…), of which indeed some are very doubtful.
        Anyway, generally one can say intelligence is influenced by the cognitive capabilities of a being. You can easily imagine an example where the brain size affects intelligence because important parts of the brain, that are required for specific cognitive tasks, are not present (whatever the reason for this may be).

        In biology, the term ‘race’ among humans is deprecated. “Pure races, in the sense of genetically homogeneous populations, do not exist in the human species today, nor is there any evidence that they have ever existed in the past” – AAPA 1996 statement on biological aspects of race.
        I expect Dawkins is very well know to this fact, yet he is an author of several books and scientific publications in this scientific field.

        >> It only takes a little step further to interpret Dawkin’s quote as racist.
        an interpretation is not a very solid statement. Your interpretation is wrong.

        >> There is very little difference in claiming that someone “is less intelligent” versus “inferior in terms of intelligence”….it’s just atheist semantics
        it is not “atheist semantics”. it is a matter of definition. As mentioned before, the is no unique definition of ‘intelligence’.

        >> Brain size being connected to intelligence is also the basis of Lynn’s book “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis”
        Richard Lynn is a psychologist, not a biologist and his work is highly criticized by many scientists.

        >> So if it is found out to be a scientific fact that brain size varies from “race” to race then Dawkin’s quote obviously supports racism.

        Dawkins would have to agree with Lynn’s conclusion. He
        – would have to agree with Lynn’s definition of ‘race’
        – would have to agree that brain size differs between the groups of population Lynn calls ‘race’
        – would have to agree with the method Lynn used to measure intelligence

        I doubt any of this is the case, because of reasons mentioned before. Anyway, I don’t know Dawkins’ oppinion about Lynn’s publication. Do you?

      • itsnobody / Sep 30 2011 2:57 pm

        Well it was a nice try, but it’s time for me to entirely ruin your weak laughable arguments.

        “No it doesn’t.”
        – Rather than giving an actual reason for the Dawkins’ quote not supporting racism you just make a baseless statement with no support.

        “If you make an factual statement please give a source.”
        – Well why don’t you look it up? Dawkins defended Watson’s comment about gays http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/letter-women-to-decide-on-gay-abortion-1279433.html

        Since Dawkins’ quotation fits in-line with what Lynn and Watson said, and Dawkins has defended Watson in the past I’m sure Dawkins most likely agrees with James D. Watson, he just doesn’t want to lose all the support he has now that he’s famous.

        “There is no unique definition of ‘intelligence’ in psychology. A number of intelligence-models do exist (Spearman, Cattels, Thurstone,…), of which indeed some are very doubtful.”
        – Lol…so how is it that liberal atheists claim they have higher IQs and are therefore smarter and superior to Theists if there is no definition of intelligence?

        If you don’t know what intelligence is, then how can liberal atheists like Richard Lynn claim that atheists are smarter than theists?

        “In biology, the term ‘race’ among humans is deprecated. “Pure races, in the sense of genetically homogeneous populations, do not exist in the human species today, nor is there any evidence that they have ever existed in the past” – AAPA 1996 statement on biological aspects of race.”
        – It’s not really relevant if you label something a race or breed or group or whatever, that’s just semantics. The DNA distances in dogs have been shown to be even closer than in humans.

        It’s irrelvant if you claim that blacks as an ethnic group or a race or a breed are genetically less intelligent.

        “an interpretation is not a very solid statement. Your interpretation is wrong.”
        – Once again instead of giving a reason for the interpetation being wrong, you just make the baseless statement. I don’t blame you, you are in desperation trying to interpret Dawkins’ quote in a non-racist way

        “it is not “atheist semantics”. it is a matter of definition. As mentioned before, the is no unique definition of ‘intelligence’.”
        – Semantics has to do with language and definition, so it is semantics.

        If atheists like you claim that you don’t know what intelligence is then how is it that atheists claim that atheists are smarter and more intelligent based off IQ testing?

        “Richard Lynn is a psychologist, not a biologist and his work is highly criticized by many scientists.”
        – If atheists don’t agree with Lynn why do they use him as a source?

        Or if IQ is not a reliable way of testing intelligence how do atheists claim they are smarter and superior based off IQ?

        “I doubt any of this is the case, because of reasons mentioned before. Anyway, I don’t know Dawkins’ oppinion about Lynn’s publication. Do you?”
        – I’m not sure, but personally I don’t agree with Lynn at all. Only atheists agree with Lynn.

        In conclusion to summarize your arguments:
        – The reason the Dawkins’ quote doesn’t support racism is because you say so (baseless statement)
        – There is no definition of intelligence, but atheists are more intelligent based off IQ testing (contradictory statement)
        – The term race is not used for humans (but it’s irrelevant whether you label something as a group or breed or race)
        – You doubt that brain size varies from ethnic group to group based off nothing

      • kathi / Sep 30 2011 4:05 pm

        >> – Rather than giving an actual reason for the Dawkin’s quote not supporting racism you just make a baseless statement with no support.

        the reasons for this statement were obviously all the statements I wrote below.

        >> – Well why don’t you look it up? Dawkins defended Watson’s comment about gays http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/letter-women-to-decide-on-gay-abortion-1279433.html

        it’s not my job to look for sources for your arguments.

        >> Since Dawkin’s quotation fits in-line with what Lynn and Watson said, and Dawkins has defended Watson in the past I’m sure Dawkins most likely agrees with James D. Watson, he just doesn’t want to lose all the support he has now that he’s famous.

        Dawkins doesn’t say he has the same oppinion as Watson. He just points out that Watson was misunderstood, which was obviously the case. That doesn’t say anything about Dawkins personal oppinion.

        >> – Lol…so how is it that liberal atheists claim they have higher IQs and are therefore smarter and superior to Theists if there is no definition of intelligence?

        You’re changing the topic. Lynn was never the topic.

        >> If you don’t know what intelligence is, then how can liberal atheists like Richard Lynn claim that atheists are smarter than theists?

        Again, I’m not talking about Lynn (I’m sick of repeating that). You’re changing the topic.

        >> – It’s not really relevant if you label something a race or breed or group or whatever, that’s just semantics.

        it’s a misuse of the term ‘race’. if it isn’t a race, don’t call it ‘race’.

        >> The DNA distances in dogs have been shown to be even closer than in humans.

        ok.

        >> It’s irrelvant if you claim that blacks as an ethnic group or a race or a breed are genetically less intelligent.
        it’s not even what I claim.

        that’s right.

        >> – Once again instead of giving a reason for the interpetation being wrong, you just make the baseless statement.

        I’ve given you the reasons to every statement you made. “You’re wrong” was the conclusion to it. it was not baseless.

        >> I don’t blame you, you are in desperation trying to interpret Dawkin’s quote in a non-racist way

        You’re interpreting Dawkins in a racist way and you can not prove it because all of your facts are wrong because of the reasons I told you and I’m telling you with this post. You simply seem to ignore that.

        >> – Semantics has to do with language and definition, so it is semantics.

        it’s semantics, not “atheist semantics”. that’s your fantasy.

        >> If atheists like you claim that you don’t know what intelligence is then how is it that atheists claim that atheists are smarter and more intelligent based off IQ testing?

        I’m not talking about Lynn. You’re changing the topic.

        >> – If atheists don’t agree with Lynn why do they use him as a source?

        I don’t know. ask them? Not all atheists do. Atheists are not a homogenous group where everybody has the same oppinion.

        >> Or if IQ is not a reliable way of testing intelligence how do atheists claim they are smarter and superior based off IQ?

        ?! I don’t repeat it again… is this a mantra or something?

        >> – I’m not sure, but personally I don’t agree with Lynn at all. Only atheists agree with Lynn.

        I also don’t agree with him. I told you about six times.

        >> In conclusion to summarize your arguments:
        >> – The reason the Dawkins quote doesn’t support racism is because you say so (baseless statement)

        no, because I gave you a whole number of reasons to each statement. it was not baseless.

        >> – There is no definition of intelligence,

        there are a number of intelligence-models. You’re denying reality.

        >> but atheists are more intelligent based off IQ testing (contradictory statement)

        that was never the topic.

        >> – The term race is not used for humans (but it’s irrelevant whether you label something as a group or breed or race)

        that’s right.

        >> – You doubt that brain size varies from ethnic group to group based off nothing

        I didn’t even say that?!

        my conclusion:
        – you’re changing the topic
        – you claim I said stuff I didn’t even say
        – denying facts
        – you still have no reason to call Dawkins racist

      • itsnobody / Oct 3 2011 3:01 am

        Wow how boring and unchallenging. Your arguments are so weak it’s boring for me to respond.

        Here’s a summary of your weak arguments:
        – You claimed that Dawkins’ quote doesn’t imply or support scientific racism, but still have refused to give a reason or explanation
        – You haven’t decided or explained if you agree with using IQ as a reliable way of measuring intelligence, so do you agree that atheists are smarter than theists based off IQ testing, yet don’t know which intelligence model to use to know if blacks are less intelligent than whites?

        This is boring me as your arguments lack any substance. How does Dawkins’ quote not support Lynn and Watson? You have refused to explain.

        I’m sure that Dawkins agrees with Watson, back in 1993 when Dawkins made his statement he wasn’t nearly as famous with all the supporters he has now. If Dawkins announces tomorrow that he agrees with Watson he will lose lots of support (except for of course all the atheist nationalists who already support him) and it would be detrimental to his career.

      • kathi / Oct 1 2011 2:41 am

        also

        – you don’t reply to questions
        – you call your vague ‘interpretation’ a fact, that you use to make outrageous claims.
        – you speak to me in a discrediting tone

        I don’t think a rational discussion is possible under these circumstances.

      • kathi / Oct 1 2011 9:41 am

        Sorry, I think I was wrong when I said that Dawkins says brain size and genes have a connection with intelligence.
        What he says is that the statement “brain size and genes have no connection to intelligence” is made by “politically correct” biologists by faith and not by reason.
        He doesn’t claim the opposite to be true.

      • itsnobody / Oct 3 2011 3:04 am

        Are you still in desperation trying to interpret Dawkins’ quote in a non-racist way?

        Brain size and genes being connected to intelligence is the very basis of scientific racism.

        Obviously Dawkins believes that brain size and genes are connected to intelligence, this is directly implied in his quote. If he believes it is by faith and not reason, then what does that imply fool?

      • kathi / Oct 3 2011 6:35 am

        >> – You claimed that Dawkins’ quote doesn’t imply or support scientific racism, but still have refused to give a reason or explanation

        You are just ignorant. I already gave you reasons and explanations. Look it up. If you have a problem with it, tell me what the problem is instead of ignoring it.

        >> – You haven’t decided or explained if you agree with using IQ as a reliable way of measuring intelligence

        I haven’t decided or explained because you haven’t asked about my personal opinion on that. IQ-tests are an objective way to measure criteria that are subjectively perceived as intelligent.

        As there is no unique definition for intelligence, there are a number of intelligence tests based on different critieria. I’m telling you this the third time. different tests can lead to different IQ-results.
        You ask me if I think IQ is a reliable way of measuring intelligence. This assumes you think there is only one test that measures IQ and only one definition of intelligence, which is not the case.

        Tests can be reliable testing certain aspects. Math-tests can be reliable testing math-skills. If you define intelligence only on mathematical criteria, I personally wouldn’t agree with that. Certain aspects like ’emotional intelligence’ are not a criteria in intelligence tests at all. Anyway, the term ‘IQ’ is today usually not used anymore or seldom used in psychology, as far as I know.

        >> How does Dawkins’ quote not support Lynn and Watson? You have refused to explain.

        Dawkins doesn’t say a word about Lynn. I already told you about Dawkins statement about Watson. It doesn’t make him a supporter of him. I haven’t refused to explain it. If you say so, you are just ignoring my explanation. If you have a problem with the explanation, tell what the problem is.

        >> Obviously Dawkins believes that brain size and genes are connected to intelligence, this is directly implied in his quote.
        >> If he believes it is by faith and not reason, then what does that imply fool?

        It is not directly implied in his quote. Let’s make an example:
        A says B believes the earth is flat without reason, just because of faith. That does not imply that A believes the earth is not flat. He could as well believe the earth is flat, squared, round or have no opinion about it. Even if C says he has a reason to say the earth is squared, it would not automatically make A a supporter of C.

        Also, don’t call me fool. that makes you kind of stupid.

      • itsnobody / Oct 5 2011 9:28 pm

        “You are just ignorant. I already gave you reasons and explanations. Look it up. If you have a problem with it, tell me what the problem is instead of ignoring it.”
        – You’ve still refused to give any reason how the Dawkins’ quote doesn’t support racism

        “I haven’t decided or explained because you haven’t asked about my personal opinion on that. IQ-tests are an objective way to measure criteria that are subjectively perceived as intelligent.

        As there is no unique definition for intelligence, there are a number of intelligence tests based on different critieria. I’m telling you this the third time. different tests can lead to different IQ-results.
        You ask me if I think IQ is a reliable way of measuring intelligence. This assumes you think there is only one test that measures IQ and only one definition of intelligence, which is not the case.

        Tests can be reliable testing certain aspects. Math-tests can be reliable testing math-skills. If you define intelligence only on mathematical criteria, I personally wouldn’t agree with that. Certain aspects like ‘emotional intelligence’ are not a criteria in intelligence tests at all. Anyway, the term ‘IQ’ is today usually not used anymore or seldom used in psychology, as far as I know.”
        – Still haven’t answered the simple question…if you don’t know what intelligence is and if there is no unique definition of intelligence then why do atheists claim that they are smarter based off IQ testing?

        “Dawkins doesn’t say a word about Lynn. I already told you about Dawkins statement about Watson. It doesn’t make him a supporter of him. I haven’t refused to explain it. If you say so, you are just ignoring my explanation. If you have a problem with the explanation, tell what the problem is.”
        – Dawkins’ quote certainly does. You still haven’t given any explanation as to how the Dawkins’ quote doesn’t support Watson and Lynn, you just intentionally refused to give one. Anyone can read your comments and see that you’ve refused to explain.

        “It is not directly implied in his quote. Let’s make an example:
        A says B believes the earth is flat without reason, just because of faith. That does not imply that A believes the earth is not flat. He could as well believe the earth is flat, squared, round or have no opinion about it. Even if C says he has a reason to say the earth is squared, it would not automatically make A a supporter of C.

        Also, don’t call me fool. that makes you kind of stupid.”
        – What a terrible argument and analogy.

        We can conclude that anyone who claims that people who believe that the earth is flat do so through faith and not reason must disagree with those who believe that the earth is flat.

        We can conclude from Dawkins’ quote that he disagrees with the conclusion that brain size has no correlation with intelligence and that intelligence is not connected to genes, which directly implies that he supports and agrees with those who believe that brain size does correlate with intelligence and intelligence is connected to genes, which directly supports Lynn and Watson.

        From the Dawkins’ quote we can see that he at least disagrees with people who claim that brain size has no correlation to intelligence that intelligence is not genetic.

      • kathi / Oct 3 2011 5:19 pm

        Btw Dawkins explicitly speaks out against racism in his book ‘The God Delusion’ in the chaper ‘the moral zeitgeist’. You can also find talks about the chapter on youtube.

      • itsnobody / Oct 5 2011 9:15 pm

        That’s just a lie. Dawkins like all other atheists simply tried to blame religion for slavery. He never actually spoke against scientific racism or racism in general. Of course Dawkins’ arguments are weak and laughable, like all atheistic arguments.

        Apparently religion is responsible for slavery but in modern times the more atheistic countries are much more racist than the more religious countries.

        Speaking of slavery, here’s what recently happened in the celebrated liberal atheist country Sweden – http://www.thelocal.se/33290/20110419/ . Holding a slave auction at the prestigious Lund University would be equivalent holding a slave auction at MIT, Princeton, or Harvard in the US.

        As usual atheists just change the subject to claiming that Theists are racists instead of criticizing racism in general or other racist atheists because they KNOW that they want racism to continue and thrive on.

  90. Goat / Sep 26 2011 8:02 pm

    I see you’ve just discovered the list of fallacies and are trying to throw around big Latin phrases. How about an American one? It’s called “Quote Mining” that should also be on the list. You have no argument. In order for you to have an argument, you must first present your position. What is this you call “Scientific Racism?” Again, look at your list of fallacies and you will find the “Argument from Ignorance” which is what your “argument” consists of. You need to do a little more research my ignorance friend.

    • itsnobody / Sep 27 2011 10:41 pm

      lol…more vague abstract claims from atheists….so which fallacy did I use? Can you explain?

      I didn’t use the argument from ignorance or quote mining,it’s just a straw man.

      Quote mining only occurs when something is taken out of context, but all the quotes here are in context and not taken out of context. James D. Watson himself claimed he wasn’t quoted out of context. As usual instead of explaining how something is out of context, atheists will only falsely claim so. Every quote here is in context and retains the exact same meaning if the whole passage is read.

      I also didn’t use an argument from ignorance at all….where did you get this idea?

      Scientific racism meaning racism supported by science (obviously).

      I really wish deep down that atheists would stop being racist or at least voice some kind of opposition to racism so that one day racism would end, but people just have to realize that as long as atheists exist racism will always thrive and remain strong, just look at 100% of atheist countries.

      Well it was a nice try, but as usual the subhuman atheist mind can never rival the superhuman Theist mind.

  91. itsnobody / Aug 24 2011 8:16 pm

    Well I declare myself the undeniable winner of this debate!

    All the responses here from atheists so far are just argumentum ad hominems, appeal to authorities, and openly agreeing that they support scientific racism.

    Also for the atheists if you were wondering the number of thumbs up or thumbs down a comment gets is irrelevant and is just an argumentum ad populum….

    We haven’t heard atheists as a whole denounce racism nor will they ever denounce it. People just have to realize that if atheists take over a country then it will immediately become nationalistic and racist. Such a disgusting low-life it is to be an atheist, they are the worst people that exist.

    ALL of my statements have remained completely un-refuted and atheists here have even openly admitted that they support scientific racism.

    Thanks for the joke argument atheists!

  92. Canadian Egghead / Aug 24 2011 3:55 pm

    A person who would write what you wrote doesn’t deserve a real argument, which is why you’re only getting ad hominems. Compared to the aforementioned brilliant scientists Dawkins, Watson, and Lynn, your comprehension of the world hovers somewhere around the level of a mushroom spore.

    http://www.racialcompact.com/Race_%20Realityand%20Denial.html

    • itsnobody / Aug 24 2011 8:11 pm

      Thanks for the laughable argument. Are you agreeing with scientific racism yet some how claiming that I am wrong?

      What an idiot. You just used an ad hominem to justify an ad hominem lol.

      I don’t really know if atheists are this dumb or not but you can’t refute something by saying “I say he doesn’t deserve an argument” or “I say his comprehension hovers somewhere around the level of a mushroom spore”

      You also openly agreed that you support scientific racism, and you also used an appeal to authority. What a complete fool, you basically agreed with everything in the article, and you are also Canadian, haha

      Well at least you can openly agree that you’re a racist unlike the other atheists.

      If you don’t understand how it’s illogical to say “that person’s a brilliant scientist so they must be right” I can explain slowly to you so that it penetrates the subhuman atheist mind

      So to summarize your entire argument “he doesn’t deserve an argument, but I agree with scientific racism and here’s a link about scientific racism”. You basically showed my statements to be true, thanks. You proved my argument for me (that atheists support scientific racism and that basically 100% of atheists are racists).

      Why can’t atheists just realize that compared to me they’ll always be subhuman in terms of intelligence?

  93. Anonymous / Aug 6 2011 2:50 pm

    I can see 3 possible sceneries here:

    1) This is a joke, in which case, you’re taking it way too far.

    2) You’re a troll, in which case you definitely should contact Guinness world records to claim the title of world’s biggest troll.

    £) You’re serious, in which case, GOD HELP US ALL!

    • itsnobody / Aug 6 2011 5:40 pm

      nah man this is not a hoax, all of the information I provided is completely accurate and true….but I don’t blame atheists for just responding with lame argument ad hominems

  94. Peeps / Aug 5 2011 10:43 pm

    This is either a troll fail or you are simply a moron.
    Thanks for teh lolz.

    • itsnobody / Aug 6 2011 5:44 pm

      hmm…saying you’re a troll or a moron is just an argument ad hominem….but atheists probably understand very little to nothing about logic, their arguments are so weak and laughable….

      “the reason he’s wrong and incorrect is because I say that he’s a troll or moron, you see some how saying that he’s a troll or a moron refutes a statement he made”

      haha thanks for very weak laughable joke arguments atheists…since everything is free and open on my blog I encourage atheists to continually give joke arguments if they want so I can embarrass them

      The simple fact is 100% of the information, quotes, etc…that I provided is all accurate…all the quotations from Dawkins, Lynn, and James D. Watson are 100% accurate…all the information is accurate

      • Nobama / May 25 2013 2:47 am

        Damn straight. These sick, racist, eugenicist atheists are really a cesspool of BS. They can’t argue effectively, because you rebut them so easily! haha

      • Tom Metzger / Feb 1 2014 8:22 am

        Why were their no Bolshevik and Soviet war criminals ever tried for WAR CRIMES. Such as Stalin’s right hand man Kazanavich (THE WOLF IN THE KREMLIN.)The ADL never tracks those WAR criminals many of which are living comfortably as old men in the U.S. Is it because most were Jews? Inquiring minds wish to know!

      • itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 7:42 pm

        Well it would just be a coincidence, there are many non-Jews in the same position, right?

      • Tom Metzger / Feb 1 2014 8:25 am

        Religion is at the core or all wars. Either directly or used to inflame.The favorite weapon of the ruling class.

      • itsnobody / Feb 21 2014 7:45 pm

        LOL!

        That explains why:
        – Estonia (the most atheistic country) has consistently the highest murder rate or one of the highest murder rates in Europe year after year
        – North Korea, an official atheist state, has the highest murder rate in East Asia
        – Stalin, an atheist is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people
        – Jim Jones, an atheist, orchestrated the second largest mass killing in US history

        Haha, you’re just an idiot

Trackbacks

  1. Movement to get society to view atheists as subhuman beings rather than as actual human beings | itsnobody

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: