About
Who am I? Around 2007 upon arising from higher states I started awakening this strange innate ability for argumentation logic that I have which surpasses even Aristotle and William of Ockham. I started unintentionally getting involved in lots of arguments and debates. This happened when I entered into higher states and started seeing all arguments in systematic patterns.
I first realized that I had this ability when I independently re-derived Ockham’s razor sometime around the beginning of 2007. But during that time I had no formal knowledge of argumentation logic at all, like nothing, so I had never heard the words “Ockham’s (or Occam’s) razor” before. Since I lacked all formal knowledge of argumentation logic and since I was completely independently reasoning things on my own I would explain what Ockham’s razor not knowing that there even existed such a phrase or principle called “Ockham’s razor”. Instead I would say something like “making the least possible amount of assumptions you would conclude this”. Then later on I discovered there was a principle in logic called “Ockham’s razor” which is precisely what I re-discovered. I figured out that every single logical fallacy is simply a violation of Ockham’s razor.
From then on I could easily instantaneously spot any illogical argument and give a detailed explanation as to why it’s illogical, even if I hadn’t known the formal name for the logical fallacy, I could explain why it’s illogical. The higher the state I enter into, the easier it is.
Of course later on after gaining some formal knowledge of argumentation logic I could give clearer explanations of things in very high details.
My innate ability for argumentation logic is probably as high or higher than the innate ability that Euler or Ramanujan had for theorems and mathematics.
I realized that I could understand argumentation logic and reason things much easier than others. I also began having an overflow of original thoughts, seemingly random ideas, and other strange experiences displaying high intuition.
I don’t really know what’s going to happen next in course of the future…but now I can finally share and preserve my thoughts online with this blog.
With the highest innate ability for argumentation logic (probably the highest that ever existed), high intelligence, high intuition, and high originality I wonder how much of my knowledge I should share with the world…and how much I should keep secret…
Kill yourself.
Also you should do an article an why god DOES exist (note I’m not an athiest). If you arguments are so perfect and you surpass the abilities of Aristotle you should accept the challenge.
The fight against atheism is the fight for truth. Don’t give up !
You seems like a guy called GoodScienceforYou in Youtube.
I’m sorry – where are my manners?
I meant to say:
Mr. Nobody,
You were featured on 12/2/12 at:
http://theskepticarena.com
neo
(replies are encouraged)
You were featured on 12/2/12 at:
http://theskepticarena.com
neo
SUP FAGGOTS?!?!?
CEman reporting in.
At first I thought this guy was funny but after seeing how much time and effort he puts into this it makes me sad. Dude you need to see a shrink immediately. You are not in a healthy place. I speak from experience, it was the best thing I ever did.
I usually don’t like to take solace in someone else’s pain but this blog/website is a good example of a religious persons response to the threat of extinction. I am someone that was brought up in a nonreligious family so I dont know what it is like to believe. It must be terrifying to see all you have believed your entire life is becoming less and less important to the world. It’s obvious that he has his doubts. Similar to a very religious gay person that refuses to except the fact that they are a homosexual. The secular world is beautiful, dont be afraid of it.
I love the irony of the current state of religion. It’s decline around the world is a direct byproduct of their beliefs and behavior. All atheists need to do is sit back and watch.
Wow – you’ve added the word “fuck” to your vocabulary. Also “subhuman”. If you keep repeating them what does that make you. An uncouth ass hole in my opinion.
If you really were good at arguments, you wouldn’t come into them with a biased stereotype of Atheists being ‘subhuman illogical idiots’ That’s just immediately assuming you’ve won and is childish.
I don’t know what made you so bitter and holier-than-thou but stop being a pompous dickhead and come back down to earth. You’re no better than anyone else.
I feel bad for entirely destroying all atheistic arguments. Since I’ve beaten them down so badly all they can do is throw lame ad hominems on my About page? How pathetic.
The About page isn’t even supposed to contain arguments fools.
You atheists should just go back to your “agreeing contests atheists fan sites” and throw ad hominems there like “I think he’s such an idiot, and he’s wrong, and he’s delusional” and then the atheists respond with “yeah I agree, [insert some personal attack here]“.
Since atheists are the dumbest form of life they’ll really believe that personal attacks are equivalent to refutations.
You atheists can throw millions of personal attacks at me, it has no effect on me, what a shame for atheists.
Atheists valuing authority and incredulity so much in these comments just shows you how they’ve completely destroyed science and turned it into a laughable popularity contest.
For those who have actual atheistic arguments for me to destroy post them here – http://itsnobody.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/free-and-open-challenge-to-atheists/
My ability seems to only work for argumentation logic and nothing more.
I don’t do this for money fools, I do this for the love of the truth (something atheists cannot understand).
Why can’t atheists just realize that against me they’ve met their one and only match?
You still never countered the argument on your page about how nazis are left wing radicals. There was a lot of evidence from myself and others against your pain and you never replied back … don’t tell me you gave up.
Also you should do an article an why god DOES exist (note I’m not an athiest). If you arguments are so perfect and you surpass the abilities of Aristotle you should accept the challenge.
Not a Poe.
A troll, and sadly, a moderately successful one at that.
It because he has no life and spends countless hours on this blog. So sad. Funny at first, but now he just deserves our pity.
This dude is the gift that keeps on giving.
Here is a debatable comment for you….Why would a person believe in a higher power they have zero proof for?
Taking all bets! What is going on with the author of this august blog?
2-1 odds for Poe!
3-1 for mild schizophrenia.
5-1 for angry teenager who has learned to use big words like ‘argumentum ad hominem’.
10-1 for narcissistic personality disorder.
1000-1 for PZ Meyers’ evil twin!
Any takers, ladies and gentlemen?
Narcissistic personality disorder. You’re on !
I have my own category, bigoted conceited smart individual who abuses knowledge and is on the wrong end of the spectrum.
I was reading it but I got bored because I’m so freaking brilliant and the author’s self-evident weaknesses aren’t very challenging.
Okay,all, time to vote. Reply to this with your vote.
I vote Poe’s Law.
I vote “young self-absorbed prick”.
I vote delusional religious freak.
Poe’s Law seems the obvious route, but just look at how much time he puts into this. I mean, it’s pathetic really. I vote narcissistic personality disorder
I think I’ve found a home for this intellectual giant!
http://www.tencommandments.org/index.html
I’m calling this a Poe.
Either that or Metacrock has some serious competition in the misguided ego department…
Well this is boring now and becoming repetitive so I’m not going to respond to any comments on this article any longer, at least for now.
We can see from the comments here from atheists that atheists are stupid, idiotic people who value authority and incredulity above everything else and are basically subhuman in terms of intelligence.
Here’s a summary of atheists’ responses:
- Ad hominems (“He’s crazy, an idiot, thinks he’s smart, self-delusional, made some grammar error, etc…”)
- Straw man
- Baseless statements
How boring and un-challenging for me….but then again what more can we expect from subhuman atheists?
I don’t know how anyone can be gullible enough to believe what atheists say.
You accuse atheists of using ad hominem attacks, yet you repeatedly refer to them as “subhuman” and call them “stupid”. Definitely trolling.
So much to work with here…so little time, so I’ll take the simplest mistake/flaw, one that happens to be my pet peeve.
You wrote, “My innate ability for argumentation logic is probably as high or higher than the innate ability that Euler or Ramanujan had for theorems and mathematics.”
It’s not even worth addressing whether the statement is true, I merely wonder why somebody as brilliant as you could not have expressed it in a manner that was grammatically correct. Written properly, it would read, “My innate ability for argumentation logic is probably as high as or higher than the innate ability that Euler or Ramanujan had for theorems and mathematics.” Without that second “as,” the sentence just doesn’t make sense. You see that, don’t you. Of course you do, you’re brilliant.
Thanks for the laugh. Recognizing arguments has nothing to do with prescriptive grammar rules, so your argument is another form of an argumentum ad hominem. Faraday had used poor spelling and grammar as well, lots of people have and still do.
I am actually not sure if it is not grammatical or not….”as high or higher than” vs. “as high as or higher than”, can you point out which grammatical rule this breaks?
Millions of articles on the internet use the same phrase that I did “as high or higher than” so if it really is not grammatical then why would it matter, it would just be another useless prescriptive grammar rule that has no value or meaning in reality. Lots of times I speak informally, so it doesn’t really matter.
Here’s one from a WebMD article:
“Child abuse and neglect are rampant in the U.S., and the annual cost is as high or higher than the cost of other major health problems, the CDC reports” – http://www.webmd.com/parenting/news/20120201/in-dollars-alone-cost-of-us-child-abuse-high
Here’s one from a University web site:
“Its total forage production is usually as high or higher than small grains, but most of this production occurs in early fall and late spring” – http://www.psla.umd.edu/extension/publications/foragefacetsno7.html
Here’s another from a University web site:
“These are particularly troublesome when scanning half-tone magazine or newspaper photos, where the dot spacing may be as high or higher than the sampling frequency.” – http://www.wfu.edu/~matthews/misc/DigPhotog/alias/
Here’s one from an article that appeared in the Journal of Physiology:
“The rate of sweating was as high or higher than Eresp.” – http://jp.physoc.org/content/417/1/421.full.pdf
So since physicists, doctors, scientists, biologists, writers, etc…have used the same phrase that I have even if it is not grammatical it would simply be a grammatical error that lots of people make that just doesn’t matter, and therefore indicates nothing.
I can literally find millions of articles using the same phrase.
So even if this is “not grammatical” it would indicate nothing, nothing at all, it would prove nothing, show nothing, and do nothing to refute any statement that I made.
Stupid atheists, even if someone does make a grammatical error then what does that refute? The answer is nothing, so it’s just a form of an argumentum ad hominem.
Since you have claimed that it is not grammatical without pointing out which grammatical rule it breaks your claim is also baseless or lacking reasoning.
I think atheists should try harder, but then again, which atheist can ever stand up to me? Just more ad hominems.
This is the funniest blog ever.
“Q: What is your I.Q.?
“A: I have no idea. People who boast about their I.Q. are losers.”–Stephen Hawking
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/magazine/12QUESTIONS.html
Yeah I agree with Stephen Hawking that people who boast about their IQ are losers….so this would mean that atheists are losers for boasting that atheists have higher IQs, right?
lol whenever the subhuman atheist mind speaks all they can do is embarrass themselves
and you can do what? Given that expertise is gained by the number of hours practicing one’s craft how would a religious person make up the hours wasted praying and a church?
The Chinese don’t go to church and are eating our lunch. Proof positive.
I’m disappointed you have revealed us only how you re-invented Ockham’s Razor and not the wheel.
I am on a higher plane of intellectual existence than you, and see that you have been deluded into thinking in warped ways…..
I am higher in intellect than any god that has ever been written about.
I have greater logical clarity than any religious man in history.
In fact, I would be a theist, only if I believed myself to be god. Proof of my power, the sky will tumble, the birds stop singing and the universe will cease to exist, when I die.
But I don’t. I am an atheist.
Well then by what reasoning have you concluded that you have a greater logical clarity?
Oh wait I forgot atheists don’t use reasoning, they use ad hominems, incredulity, and straw man!
As for my reasons, I have independently re-derived Ockham’s razor, figured out that all logical fallacies are simply violations of Ockham’s razor, and have the ability to explain in high details why an argument is illogical, all without any formal knowledge of argumentation logic.
You don’t invent new things and solve problems with ad hominems oh clueless one.
You are just so out of touch with reality. How many patents do YOU have?
Bollocks
Well I declare myself the winner of this debate so far.
How boring and un-challenging.
By what reasoning have these subhuman atheists concluded that I am delusional? Which one of my statements is flawed or incorrect? All of them are true are flawless.
I have asked atheists for reasons and all they have are ad hominems.
Hey look I’m a subhuman atheist “You see since I’m an atheist I know that you can refute a statement by throwing personal attacks at a person….like say for instance if someone claims that the Earth revolves around the Sun, I can refute that statement by accusing the person of suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect or being a crackpot or self-delusional…checkmate!”
Hey look I’m a subhuman atheist “You see since I’m an atheist I know that you can show that something is true by pointing out if an authority figure says so or not….like say for instance if authority figure says that black holes do not exist true that would be equivalent to evidence that black holes do not exist….checkmate!”
I don’t even know how it’s possible for anyone to be as stupid as an atheist. Who can drop to the atheist level of stupidity?
It’s always a great laugh to see an atheist open up that slick thick atheistic skull, they are truthfully the dumbest forms of life.
Silly atheists, you’re just no match for me, all you can do is copy from what I and other Theists taught you.
Poe’s law at work?
Yeah, I’m pretty sure it’s Poe’s law. Either that or a 16 year old.
It’s Poe’s law and a 16 year old. Notice how it constantly claims that it’s bored. Maybe it should find a girl or boy or animal to have some kind of meaningful relationship with. Even if it’s just its own hand.
I am not actually 16 years old, I am in my early 20s, but why would my age matter? And why would it matter if I was bored or not?
It’s just another ad hominem.
It’s quite obvious from these comments from atheists that atheists obviously understand very little to nothing about logic.
His blog is Poe’s Law. Interestingly though, the comment that you replied to is Danth’s Law.
Mr. Nobody, some people try to dazzle with brilliance, some try to baffle with bullshit. You have done neither. Skip esoteric speculation for a moment and explain in simple terms what Moses and his crew did with the 32 thousand virgin Midianite girls? In your wisdom, can you explain just what the priests did with their share of little girls? You know the story don’t you Mr. Nobody? Numbers 31 in the bad book if you need to refresh your simple mind.
Mr. Nobody, if you truly are a masterdebater, could you explain why Lot got both his daughters pregnant? I’m sure you know where to find that in the bad book, Genesis 19.
Hey, I just read some of your stuff. That short piece on the hurricane makes me wonder. That work you had to do before school, was that homework, for school that day? Do you ride a bus to school? Is that bus of a different length than the buses everybody else rides?
Hi there Mr.Fool,
Where in this article have I claimed that I am believer in Biblical inerrancy?
It’s just another straw man.
Atheists should keep posting comments, it is just funny to see their level of stupidity.
UMMM, What debate have you won?? Sorry, don’t see any debate, just you mentally masterbating yourself to climax.
Oh… yes… Logical fallacy’s… yes.. YES… OH GOD YES…
Wow how boring are these comments…..
So you all have ridiculed me, and claimed that I am delusional, crazy, etc….but by what reasoning?
Which statement of mine is flawed?
Is it defining Ockham’s razor as “making the least possible amount of assumnptions”?
Is it claiming that all logical fallacies are simply violations of Ockham’s razor?
All of my statements are true and flawless. All I see here are lame ad hominems.
I don’t blame atheists for having nothing to say besides ad hominems, they are subhuman in terms of intelligence and basically incapable of independently reasoning anything, all they can do is copy.
You can star with this claim: “Around 2007 upon arising from higher states I started awakening this strange innate ability for argumentation logic that I have which surpasses even Aristotle and William of Ockham.”
Anything there we shouldn’t laugh about?
It doesn’t really bother me if people find my story to be laughable. Why should I become disturbed?
It’s just another form of an argumentum ad hominem.
since you mentioned it, yes, “all logical fallacies are simply violations of Ockham’s razor,” is not merely false, it’s silly. If for instance I make the argument, “q follows from p. p is true therefore q is true,” my error is certainly not a simple violation of Ockham’s razor. In fact Ockham’s razor doen’t have much to do with logical fallacies at all. Rather, it is a principle for choosing between two theories when both are logical.
Clear case of paranoid delusions of grandeur.
It’s is one of my life-long dreams to watch a freight-train wreck up close (but not so close to get hurt obviously). I think I finally got my wish.
Prove it. Nullius in verba.
“From time to time a human being arises with an extraordinary ability to go above and beyond a normal human….”
Reminiscent of the psychopathic Locke in Orson Scott Card’s Enders Game, minus the characters inate genius and force of argument.
itsnobody has read the book many times I suspect.
So why would it matter if it’s reminiscent of a psychopath or not? It’s just another lame ad hominem
“I think Newton was like a psychopath, so yeah Newton’s theorems are wrong”
What a delusional.
Have fun with your delusional atheist friends living in their delusional “authority and incredulity is all that matters” world.
There is nothing delusional about the lack of evidence of any of the 2,500+ deities people currently believe in, Itsnobody.
Get a grip on reality, sonny.
I did not claim that there was anything “delusional about the lack of evidence of any of the 2,500+ deities people currently believe in” in this article…it’s just another straw man.
If you want to post atheistic arguments then freely do so on my other article.
It is illogical to complain about ad hominem arguments when you post about how great you are (and by comparison how much everybody else must suck). In this case ad hominem arguments are on topic and not fallacies.
lol…how are the argumentum ad hominems here not fallacious? You have not explained because atheists don’t use explanations, just baseless statements.
So go ahead and explain to me with your subhuman mind how someone claiming that they are great indicates that ad hominems are on topic and not fallacious?
This entire time no one has refuted any statement that I have made. It’s just ad hominems, straw man, and the typical baseless responses from atheists.
How boring these comments are just the common lame ad hominems “you’re crazy, an idiot, delusional, etc…” wtf?
But I doubt the subhuman atheist mind can even understand what an argumentum ad hominem is.
I can help the subhuman atheists understand why it’s illogical if they need further clarification, lol.
Just face the facts atheists, against me you’ve met you’re one and only match, that’s why all you have are lame ad hominems.
In the delusional atheist’s world:
“Newton was a crackpot, so Newton’s geometric proofs must be wrong”
“Ramanujan had no college education and flunked out of college more than once, so his theorems are wrong”
“Faraday had no education after the age of 13, so his experiments and ideas are useless”
What does throwing personal attacks at me do? The answer is it does NOTHING to refute any claims I made.
Atheists should just stick to throwing lame ad hominems since they lack the ability to reason anything.
Seriously? Seriously!? You, my friend, are hysterical.
I think it is funny how you answer one ad hominem with another. Really classy like. (For clarification, I’m being sarcastic).
I think it is funny that you do not understand the difference between name-calling and an ad hominem.
If I claim that someone is foolish and then go on to refute their statement, that’s not an ad hominem, it’s just name-calling.
If I claim that someone is foolish without refuting their statement, then that would be an ad homninem.
I always have to teach the subhuman atheists about logic and reasoning since they understand nothing about it, all they can do is copy, not independently think.
I’m not sure he learned proper grammar with his heightened states of mind…
Proper grammar or prescriptive grammar is just man-made rules that have no basis in linguistics.
Also anyone can make spelling or grammar errors while typing quickly (especially on this laptop keyboard).
Also when people have highly original thoughts it is often difficult to express those thoughts in words, so expressing highly original thoughts may cause one to violate prescriptive grammar rules.
In other words using proper grammar is really an indication of nothing.
Thiis are ezactly right! You are mostly geniuse! I’m too fast for these key to cacheup to my mindtoo!
Except that intentionally misspelling things doesn’t refute what I said about prescriptive grammar, fool.
Last I heard linguistics is man-made, too.
Well that’s true, but prescriptive grammar rules have nothing to do with the structure of language, they just have to do with man-made rules that people agree to.
Take for instance the difference between saying “drawed” and “drew”. In reality “drawed” should be valid but because of prescriptive grammar rules people decided that you should say “drew” instead, why? Because some people said so, not because it has anything to do with the actual structure of language.
Man, people are just the worst.
Please get help
I don’t think the asshole is letting any more comments get in.
He’s an idiot but unfortunately he’s no more insane than most Christian tards.
Dunning-Kruger FTW.
Beat me to it. Also, /facepalm.
Haha… yes, a classic example. But how old is this nutbar?
We definitely have an illustration of the Dunning-Kruger effect at work with Itsnobody. I hope you get yourself some help.
Yes, that seems to be the general consensus. Delusions of grandeur also at work I suspect.
Your self-delusion is also high but your modesty level is low.
Oh – I see now. He has no ads so he’s looking for traffic so he can make money. Wonder why he doesn’t just do it the way regular Christian beggars do it.
They just start websites claiming that the government is going to make everybody gay or have an abortion and the only way to stop it is to send money NOW.
Why would I care about money for? If I gain money I will still be able to experience anger, distress, and unhappiness…so how can money be what I’m seeking?
I’m going with the hypothesis that itsnobdy is like 14. Only somebody who doesn’t have to make rent would say that.
Once again, I ask subhuman atheists the question of why would someone’s age matter?
A 14-year old can make a valid statement and a 42-year old can make an invalid statement. You can’t show that a statement is valid or invalid by pointing out someone’s age fools (atheists, it’s the same thing) unless of course their statement is directly connected to age.
If people wonder why I consider atheists to be subhuman in terms of intelligence, just read the comments here from atheists.
Please let us know where you have written peer reviewed articles or papers? Please let us know what mind boggling inventions you have made? Do you design anything? Do you have any patents?
If you are so proud of yourself and make such a point of you virtuousness why don’t you publish your name and qualifications. Surely with god on your side with his inerrant words you have nothing to fear?
I haven’t published any peer reviewed articles or papers yet….but why would that matter?
Oh wait I forgot all that matters in science now that atheists have taken over is authority and incredulity instead of what’s actually valid and true.
Contrary to what delusional atheists believe something existing in peer-reviewed journals doesn’t make it valid, and something not existing in peer-reviewed journals doesn’t make it invalid. I’ve read so many things in peer-reviewed journals that contain flaws and errors.
Maybe eventually I will publish articles, but what do you mean about nothing to fear since God is on my side?
The point is that you haven’t accomplished anything of intellectual note, and despite the fact you’re quite skilled at telling everyone how smart you are, you’ve done nothing to demonstrate it.
The difference between intelligent people, and people who simply believe themselves to be smarter than everyone else, is that intelligent people actually possess the capacity for self criticism and reflection. You seem to totally lack this ability.
Your screed about how atheists have ruined science, for example, is a complete joke. All you’ve demonstrated is that you know nothing about science beyond what you’ve seen on TV or read online. Are you honestly unaware of the criticism of string theory Because you clearly don’t have the slightest understanding of the observations and math that support it… and comparing string theory to intelligent design? You do realize that one is a complex theory based on mathematical proofs and serious observations, and the other is basically just some people saying “Well, *somebody* musta done it!”
I have debated with many knowledgeable people who I disagreed with, and who possessed a solid grasp of logic. You’re not demonstrating any of those traits. You just seem like some kid who got into some arguments with a few people who didn’t know what they were talking about, and somehow this led you to believe you were the smartest debater on the planet, which is actually pretty hilarious.
lol…to summarize your argument “You are wrong because I say so”
You have claimed that I lack intelligence but have not given any reasons.
If you want to discuss the string theory, then please post your arguments under my string theory article so I can entirely destroy you.
So your whole response is just “I say he’s wrong because I say so, yeah I say so”
As for being the smartest debater in the world or in all of human history, I really am, but that’s really a subjective opinion (unless of course you a found a way to objectively measure it).
With such unprecedented levels of intelligence, what on earth are you doing wasting your time blogging about it? You ought to be out seeking governmental power so that you can put your miraculous talents to actual use.
Well not exactly unprecedented levels of intelligence….it only works for argumentation logic
Why would I care about seeking government power? I don’t get it…all that stuff is temporary, also if I gain government power I would still be able to experience anger, distress, stress, unhappiness, etc….so why would having government power matter to me?
Don’t you have a moral compass? Are you so selfish as to keep you gifts to yourself and not improve the world?
You should keep ALL OF IT A SECRET dude! Don’t let anybody know, just keep it all to yourself. After you’ve become rich and famous with your secret knowledge, come back and let us know how you did it. OK?
Why would I care about becoming rich and famous? That is all temporary and meaningless to me.
What I actually care about is bringing out this enjoyment already within
Fucking LOL
“Who am I? Around 2007 upon arising from higher states I started awakening this strange innate ability for argumentation logic that I have which surpasses even Aristotle and William of Ockham.”
“My innate ability fo…r argumentation logic is probably as high or higher than the innate ability that Euler or Ramanujan had for theorems and mathematics.”
This is on a Conservapedia level of blatant stupidity. Either a really blatant poe, or the mutant lovechild of shockofgod and the timecube guy. Alternate hypothesis: It’s the repository for future fox news stories.
Wow. I just looked up Time Cube guy, and found this really horrible, huge fonts (with colors) website spewing something I didn’t understand. Is that the time cube guy?
yes, yes it is.
Your about section reads like a textbook example of someone suffering from narcissistic delusion. I genuinely feel sorry for you. Please seek help.
I concur. At first I was tempted to ridicule the grandiosity and arrogance of the writer but the more I read the more I believe this has to be a mental illness – unless maybe he is Lex Luthor.
Claiming that I have a mental illness is just an argumentum ad hominem.
It’s just like I said before, if anyone wants to know why I consider atheists to be subhuman in terms of intelligence just read their comments, it’s all a joke.
Dear Child,
I am a mere 14 year old, yet I see through your silly ways. I got high with chuckie, from chuckie cheese one time, and i saw shit you couldn’t begin to believe.
Keep it real nigga.
Warm Regards, and Fire Crotches,
Steve
A number of genuinely fantastic information, Gladiolus I detected this unique.