Skip to content

About

Who am I? Around 2007 upon arising from higher states I started awakening this strange innate ability for argumentation logic that I have which surpasses even Aristotle and William of Ockham. I started unintentionally getting involved in lots of arguments and debates. This happened when I entered into higher states and started seeing all arguments in systematic patterns.

I first realized that I had this ability when I independently re-derived Ockham’s razor sometime around the beginning of 2007. But during that time I had no formal knowledge of argumentation logic at all, like nothing, so I had never heard the words “Ockham’s (or Occam’s) razor” before. Since I lacked all formal knowledge of argumentation logic and since I was completely independently reasoning things on my own I would explain what Ockham’s razor not knowing that there even existed such a phrase or principle called “Ockham’s razor”. Instead I would say something like “making the least possible amount of assumptions you would conclude this”. Then later on I discovered there was a principle in logic called “Ockham’s razor” which is precisely what I re-discovered. I figured out that every single logical fallacy is simply a violation of Ockham’s razor.

From then on I could easily instantaneously spot any illogical argument and give a detailed explanation as to why it’s illogical, even if I hadn’t known the formal name for the logical fallacy, I could explain why it’s illogical. The higher the state I enter into, the easier it is.

Of course later on after gaining some formal knowledge of argumentation logic I could give clearer explanations of things in very high details.

My innate ability for argumentation logic is probably as high or higher than the innate ability that Euler or Ramanujan had for theorems and mathematics.

I realized that I could understand argumentation logic and reason things much easier than others. I also began having an overflow of original thoughts, seemingly random ideas, and other strange experiences displaying high intuition.

I don’t really know what’s going to happen next in course of the future…but now I can finally share and preserve my thoughts online with this blog.

With the highest innate ability for argumentation logic (probably the highest that ever existed), high intelligence, high intuition, and high originality I wonder how much of my knowledge I should share with the world…and how much I should keep secret…

146 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Joe "Non atheist" Rogers / Sep 11 2014 8:11 pm

    Lobotomy lobotomy how lovely are your changes
    Lobotomy lobotomy how lovely are your changes
    The voices in your head will go as hemispheres are split below
    Lobotomy lobotomy how lovely are your changes
    Lobotomy lobotomy how lovely are your changes

    • Mary "Not the mother of.... but proud theist" Jones / Sep 11 2014 8:15 pm

      Joe Rogers,
      Are your phrases meant to be sung to Oh Christmas Tree?
      Mary

      • Joe "Non atheist" Rogers / Sep 11 2014 8:17 pm

        Yes Mary that was the general idea..

  2. Ryan Schick / Jul 27 2014 3:19 pm

    Itsnobody logic:
    1. *hate speech on youtube about how atheists should go to insane asylum subhuman beings blah blah blah. Video gets deleted by youtube.* “Youtube used to be a place where you could post whatever you wanted but now atheists have taken over for hate speech.”
    2. *so much dislikes on this website not only coming from atheists but also creationists who think itsnobody is rude.* “atheists think that ratings make a big difference which is why I deleted ratings.”
    3. *some atheists are racist* “100% of atheists are subhuman because 100% of them are racist.”
    4. *it is physically possible for an atheist to murder someone.* “all atheists are psychos and murderers.”
    5. “atheists hate all non atheists” *hates all non theists*

  3. steve anariono / Jun 14 2014 4:39 pm

    You’re a jackass. You’re either full of shit or just not very funny. Either way, you probably suck at life. Have fun being a lifelong douche bag,

  4. Ἰησοῦς / May 16 2014 10:37 am

    This is probably the most flimsy collection of faulty logic, selective cognition, arbitrary conclusions and non sequitur arguments I’ve seen on a website. Rather unsurprisingly its level of temper tantrum slurring and hysterical loathing even trumps the usual self-styled internet demagogues. Congratulations for this vast digital contribution of dubious value to human culture.
    (Feel free to obstinately reinterpret these words as inadvertent reverse confirmation utilized for a direly needed compensation).

  5. Anonymous / Apr 15 2014 9:53 am

    In this moment I am euphoric…

  6. Anonymous / Mar 19 2014 5:14 pm

    Read about other’s less. Contribute something- other than you’re words in a blog.

  7. ben / Mar 2 2014 5:46 pm

    Wow, this blogger is the most arrogant person I’ve read from in a long time.

  8. Stephanie Braddock / Feb 26 2014 12:28 am

    Half of the time, I read what this guy/girl has to say and I think it’s a joke. Unfortunately, I’m not sure anymore. If it’s true… This ‘about’ page is so completely self-absorbed and self-important that I don’t even know how to start. This person is ranking his/herself above Aristotle, but I see no evidence of that. This person, joking or not, is completely and utterly close-minded, it’s sickening.

  9. itsnobody / Jan 15 2014 12:53 am

    haha, atheists can’t really say anything to me except for personal attacks.

    They have to run and hide and stop people from criticizing and scrutinizing their beliefs and arguments in fear and to preserve their anti-science ways.

    They know if they stick out an atheist argument that I’ll just destroy it and blow it.

    Atheists should just stop participating in science, I already explained in detail the problems atheists have been causing in my other articles. The main block to scientific progress always has been the atheist population, that’s why after atheists took over in the late 1960s and early 1970s we immediately stopped finding cures, the life expectancy started growing slower, physics became stuck with empirically untestable hypotheses, technology started growing slower, and science is just a joke about authority and incredulity.

    Atheists just can’t do anything right, atheists JUST GO HOME, don’t participate in science and focus only on basic survival skills.

    Atheists have thrown us into the darkness, that’s how it’s always been, it’s up to Theists to light the place up.

    I’m glad I allow free speech, and for people to even insult me, it just shows the world their subhuman level of intelligence.

    Many may find my story ridiculous, but it really is true. Given our current technology I would only be able to prove that my brain waves are different in higher states and not much more.

    Of course with better more advanced technology on measuring consciousness I would be able to show more.

    I don’t know why I have appeared in this world, but I know that there’s something inside of me that longs to create a heaven-like world in at least one region on Earth.

    I better finish working on my secretive physics model and get it complete enough to work for at least practical matters, then with that I should be able to solve all of my problems and every world problem very easily, but I don’t know how much I would be able to release or if the world is ready.

    If I succeed I will post one last final article on my blog site…

    I know that in the double-slit experiment when you look through you see the electron in your timeline, but I won’t discuss the other details, at least not yet..

    It really is true that deep deep within everything there lies the boundless light, it really is true that many many heavenly and hellish worlds exist, it really is true that God exists in a personal and impersonal form, it really is true that these things can be scientifically and experimentally proven.

    Of course I’m still uncertain as to whether or not all phenomena can be explained as wave-like only, meaning that everything really is a form of light.

    Unlike other Theists, I encourage criticism & scrutiny, knowing my beliefs to be true, and I’m certain that one day I or someone else will scientifically prove these things and many more…

    But remember in science we can never know what is actually true, just what is consistent and matches observations!!

    • steve anarino / Jun 14 2014 4:52 pm

      Oh boy, I didn’t realize how sad a situation this really is.

      Could it be possible that you ‘win’ so many arguments because after 10 seconds of talking to a reasonably intelligent person he/she prefers to just ignore you, leaving only juvenile idiots behind?

      Can’t wait to see that ‘secretive physics model’ you’ve been working on. I’m sure it’s a real gift to the universe.

      By the way, calling people who disagree with you essentially dumb ‘Atheists’ and telling them to ‘go home’ is not how you encourage constructive criticism, its how you engender hate. Your goal is clearly to agitate and nothing else. (or you’re insane and I hope you get help that you need)

      All of your claims stink of fraud – basically your saying “I know it sounds like fantasy and no where else has this occurred and no, I cannot prove anything I say, but it’s real! Just take my word for it.” Right, I think you and Bernie Madhoff share some similar views on reality.

      I’m sorry you have these personality problems, I hope it’s not a life long issue for you.

    • Anonymous / Jul 14 2014 8:40 pm

      You say you are better than everyone, but you say people are in denial all the time when you are the only person on this website that is on your side and that is delusional.
      You say everything other than how atheism is false. That’s stupid.
      Your top 10 questions for atheists was made by you because you talk about those things all the time and the questions were related to every stupid thing on this website.
      You say that atheists are intolerant, but you are the most intolerant person when it comes to atheists.

  10. itsnobody / Jan 11 2014 11:54 am

    Atheists should just go back to their agreeing-contest/anti-science atheist fan sites and forums where they can force people to agree with them and discourage criticism and scrutiny (anti-science stance).

    I allow people to freely question, criticize, and scrutinize the things I say unlike the fools (atheists).

    And they know it, an I show it, stick your low-life atheist argument out and I’ll blow it!

    All atheists can do with their low-life atheist mouth is throw personal attacks, they can’t refute anything or provide reasons for anything.

    Just read the comments here from the fools (atheists), nothing constructive, just baseless personal attacks as if they are subhuman in terms of intelligence.

    It’s no wonder atheists very very very strongly discourage criticism and scrutiny of claims that they personally agree with, they know they’re wrong and have to take certain precautions.

    Haha, it’s a good thing they can ban and block people on their own sites to stop criticism (anti-science stance).

    • Anonymous / Jul 14 2014 8:42 pm

      You realize the smartest person in the world would think of this as a stupid website.
      And don’t say you are, because that would be ridiculous.

  11. itsnobody / Jan 11 2014 9:27 am

    haha the fools (atheists) should just realize that in terms of informal argumentation logic I really am the best (at least right now on Earth).

    I feel sad that anyone can be as gullible and delusional as an atheist is. The main sign of their delusions is blocking people/preventing criticism & scrutiny of their laughable claims.

    One of the main principles in science is allowing criticism and scrutiny of all things because if something really is true then it will stand up to any amount of criticism.

    This is why atheists intentionally discourage criticism and scrutiny of their own claims, because firstly they are staunch anti-science fanatics, and secondly they know that if people criticize their claims that they will be exposed as false.

    To summarize the fools’ (atheists’) responses:
    “I say he’s wrong, and he’s wrong, he’s wrong, [insert some personal attack here], he’s delusional, and he’s wrong, and look some other atheists also throw personal attacks and claim that he’s wrong, [insert some personal attack here] I don’t have any reasons to support any of my assertions, but me and some other atheists say that he’s wrong, I’m going to try to stop people from criticizing my claims”

    ROFL, it’s funny because it’s true.

    haha, it’s always a great laugh to see an atheist desperation, these guys need help, that’s why all they can do is throw personal attacks and prevent criticism.

    That’s it.

    • Ryan Schick / Jul 14 2014 8:56 pm

      Richard Dawkins would crush you, so I don’t know why you are saying you are the best at arguing with no proof.
      The only thing you are afraid to argue about is how atheists are wrong about the creation of the universe. You never complain and whine about that unlike other things.
      Atheists aren’t SCIENTIFICLY blocking off free and open critisism, they just block of criticism that they know is gonna be dumb like you saying “which do you hate more, Muslims or Jews?” They block that off so that they don’t have to deal with a whiner.

  12. itsnobody / Jan 10 2014 9:57 pm

    What a bunch of shit comments from stupid atheists, time to set them straight.

    There’s been lots of people in history who have had strange beliefs and meditated, having strange beliefs and meditating doesn’t indicate that you’re mentally unstable (you can check the symptoms).

    There’s been lots of people in history who have had strange beliefs and meditated, having strange beliefs and meditating doesn’t necessarily indicate that you’re delusional (you can only determine if someone’s belief is delusional if the belief is empirically testable).

    I know an atheist who has a mental disorder (schizophrenia) and he never had any strange beliefs or meditated, having strange beliefs and meditating has little to do with mental instability and other mental disorders.

    I guess people know why I consider atheists as subhuman in terms of intelligence, they’re just like nothing to me.

    They are just all-round stupid people, all they do is throw personal attacks at people rather than attempting to refute something or providing valid reasons.

    The comments here just prove how stupid they are.

    Just plain boring and annoying.

  13. Zen Galacticore / Dec 31 2013 3:48 am

    What you are is delusional. You are an egocentric, self-important, self-absorbed, narcissistic WANNABE megalomaniac. In other words, you’re not charismatic or smart enough to be a true megalomaniac. Hitler, or the emperor Domitian maybe, but not you.

    • itsnobody / Jan 11 2014 9:31 am

      Like how? How am I delusional? Please explain for once instead of throwing personal attacks alone (ad hominems).

      Being delusional means having false beliefs or beliefs in direct contradiction to evidence or proof (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/delusional?s=t).

      So by this definition, people who believe in the existence of free-will would be delusional.

      If a belief is empirically untestable, this means that it’s impossible for contradictory or supporting evidence to exist for the belief, meaning you wouldn’t be able to determine if the person is actually delusional or not.

      Are String theorists, believers in multiple timelines, multiple universes, etc…delusional? The answer is science doesn’t know if their beliefs are true or false since their beliefs are outside the realm of empirical testability.

      Science makes claims only about things within the realm of empirical testability. I’m sure the fools (atheists) didn’t know this.

      So in short: It’s impossible to know if I’m actually delusional or not (unless you find a way to empirically test my beliefs).

      Of course I’m come very far, and I’m certain that in the future I or someone else will prove the existence of God and an afterlife.

      Notice how my comments are always vastly superior to the fools (atheists).

  14. butt / Dec 22 2013 6:09 am

    This author is a Nazi, Christian, atheist, socialist, patriarchal racist and nothing more.

    • Zen Galacticore / Dec 31 2013 3:42 am

      “Nazi-Christian-atheist” are contradictions in terms.

  15. Tee Ess / Oct 28 2013 6:58 pm

    My suspicion about this author is that he is a former PhD candidate who developed a very severe mental illness and now writes the same post over and over again on one of the internet’s bizarrest blogs.

    I don’t think anyone should be mean to the author or say mean things about them. What they are going through is not their fault. But to the author, I say this: please seek help. You have writing ability and could get your life back on track, I know you could. But you can’t do it alone. I know, having been mentally ill myself, that the world you create for yourself in that state of mind feels so real, and it feels like the outside world is waging a constant assault on it, but as a lover of truth you have to seize the chance to recognize that it’s not real, there’s another world out there, and you’re so close to accessing it!

    • Anonymous / Dec 20 2013 2:06 pm

      If you are an atheist , you are evidently mentally ill. Heal your own illness before you judge someone else.
      Good bye , Tee Ess ! Hope you will meet a good doctor.

  16. Anonymous / Oct 1 2013 10:58 pm

    lol this guy has to be trolling for the LULZ. i do it all the time, just not on the scale of this guy. he can’t possibly be real as i can’t imagine anyone THIS stupid would exist in this world.

  17. Chris / Sep 29 2013 3:32 am

    After reading several entries of this blog, I cannot but think about only two possibilities:
    This blog is a parody, or..
    This blog belongs to an atheist troll

    It’s only it is too surreal to be true (although I might be wrong)

    (sorry for my English, I’m not a native speaker…)

  18. Vix-Trader / Aug 29 2013 3:22 am

    One of the most powerful tools we have for forward progress is dissent and public ridicule. Let me be the first…. scratch that, seemingly the 10,000th person to re-iterate that you sir are a complete moron.

  19. Moderator / Jun 22 2013 1:22 pm

    Entering into higher states? LMAO! You are a delusional fascist cunt who is an unemployed troll spending his entire time day in and day out spouting delusional theories. And stop spamming our blog with your endless stupidity.

  20. Anonymous / Jun 18 2013 3:08 pm

    Doesnt matter what or how you argue something jesus is the way

  21. Anonymous / Jun 17 2013 12:31 am

    Your med haven’t kicked in. what have you done so remarkable that you can….. hell, I’m wasting my time. History has brought countless narcissism like yourself and no one has ever convinced your kind that their wrong, stupid, need a girlfriend, have deep seeded emotional issues stemming from your past that make you think you’ve figured anything out, etc.Enjoy your life of mediocrity, LOL!!!

  22. Anonymous / May 30 2013 12:25 am

    It’s sad that an intelligent person as your self is so presumptious. I hope that one day your intelligence would rationally make you conclude that you are indeed a tiny, ignorant nobody who realizes the inherent uncertainty of anything that uses the hopelessly finite human mind. There’s nothing wrong with that, and arguments and reason are all we got, but we must admit our own frailty instead of arrogantly boasting.

    Then you would truly be awakened.

  23. Imari / May 23 2013 1:25 pm

    Casanova buy cheap viagra online Love Secret.

  24. Anonymous / Apr 23 2013 12:28 pm

    Kill yourself.

  25. TriCountySyndicate / Apr 3 2013 4:35 pm

    Also you should do an article an why god DOES exist (note I’m not an athiest). If you arguments are so perfect and you surpass the abilities of Aristotle you should accept the challenge.

  26. Anonymous / Feb 22 2013 6:04 pm

    The fight against atheism is the fight for truth. Don’t give up !

  27. takwai / Dec 18 2012 3:48 am

    You seems like a guy called GoodScienceforYou in Youtube.

  28. neo / Dec 2 2012 12:30 pm

    I’m sorry – where are my manners?

    I meant to say:

    Mr. Nobody,
    You were featured on 12/2/12 at:

    http://theskepticarena.com

    neo

    (replies are encouraged)

  29. NEO / Dec 2 2012 12:44 am

    You were featured on 12/2/12 at:

    http://theskepticarena.com

    neo

  30. CEman / Oct 2 2012 3:39 am

    SUP FAGGOTS?!?!?
    CEman reporting in.

  31. Science is more beautiful than religion / May 29 2012 3:44 pm

    At first I thought this guy was funny but after seeing how much time and effort he puts into this it makes me sad. Dude you need to see a shrink immediately. You are not in a healthy place. I speak from experience, it was the best thing I ever did.

    I usually don’t like to take solace in someone else’s pain but this blog/website is a good example of a religious persons response to the threat of extinction. I am someone that was brought up in a nonreligious family so I dont know what it is like to believe. It must be terrifying to see all you have believed your entire life is becoming less and less important to the world. It’s obvious that he has his doubts. Similar to a very religious gay person that refuses to except the fact that they are a homosexual. The secular world is beautiful, dont be afraid of it.

    I love the irony of the current state of religion. It’s decline around the world is a direct byproduct of their beliefs and behavior. All atheists need to do is sit back and watch.

    • Nobama / May 25 2013 2:59 am

      Really? Atheism is really only rising in countries that are declining. The UK, France, Sweden, US.
      Christianity is rising rapidly in China however, which is set to be the new superpower.

    • itsnobody / Jan 11 2014 12:01 pm

      I’m perfectly healthy and mentally stable, nothing indicates otherwise.

      The historical consensus is that religion caused science to exist, lol. I’m sure you didn’t know that, because atheists in general are anti-science and are always clueless.

      My parents and sister are atheists, so I have no type of psychological pressure to believe.

      Science is beautiful, that’s why atheists are naturally anti-science, they hate criticism & scrutiny, and everything that led up to science would’ve just been viewed as philosophical nonsense and a waste of time to an atheist.

      Spending all day intensely studying philosophy and astronomy (what caused the scientific method, Newtonian physics, and higher mathematics to exist) would’ve just been viewed as a waste of time to an atheist since human beings need only food, water, and shelter for basic survival, not philosophy and astronomy.

      To all atheists participating in science: JUST GO HOME PLEASE, DON’T PARTICIPATE

  32. Chris P / Apr 9 2012 10:13 pm

    Wow – you’ve added the word “fuck” to your vocabulary. Also “subhuman”. If you keep repeating them what does that make you. An uncouth ass hole in my opinion.

  33. Anonymous / Mar 30 2012 3:12 am

    If you really were good at arguments, you wouldn’t come into them with a biased stereotype of Atheists being ‘subhuman illogical idiots’ That’s just immediately assuming you’ve won and is childish.

    I don’t know what made you so bitter and holier-than-thou but stop being a pompous dickhead and come back down to earth. You’re no better than anyone else.

  34. itsnobody / Mar 12 2012 2:06 am

    I feel bad for entirely destroying all atheistic arguments. Since I’ve beaten them down so badly all they can do is throw lame ad hominems on my About page? How pathetic.

    The About page isn’t even supposed to contain arguments fools.

    You atheists should just go back to your “agreeing contests atheists fan sites” and throw ad hominems there like “I think he’s such an idiot, and he’s wrong, and he’s delusional” and then the atheists respond with “yeah I agree, [insert some personal attack here]“.

    Since atheists are the dumbest form of life they’ll really believe that personal attacks are equivalent to refutations.

    You atheists can throw millions of personal attacks at me, it has no effect on me, what a shame for atheists.

    Atheists valuing authority and incredulity so much in these comments just shows you how they’ve completely destroyed science and turned it into a laughable popularity contest.

    For those who have actual atheistic arguments for me to destroy post them here – http://itsnobody.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/free-and-open-challenge-to-atheists/

    My ability seems to only work for argumentation logic and nothing more.

    I don’t do this for money fools, I do this for the love of the truth (something atheists cannot understand).

    Why can’t atheists just realize that against me they’ve met their one and only match?

    • TriCountySyndicate / Apr 3 2013 4:33 pm

      You still never countered the argument on your page about how nazis are left wing radicals. There was a lot of evidence from myself and others against your pain and you never replied back … don’t tell me you gave up.

      • TriCountySyndicate / Apr 3 2013 4:36 pm

        Also you should do an article an why god DOES exist (note I’m not an athiest). If you arguments are so perfect and you surpass the abilities of Aristotle you should accept the challenge.

  35. Whateverman / Feb 8 2012 11:44 am

    Not a Poe.

    A troll, and sadly, a moderately successful one at that.

    • juegoconfuego / Jun 19 2012 2:52 am

      It because he has no life and spends countless hours on this blog. So sad. Funny at first, but now he just deserves our pity.

  36. Bidoof / Feb 8 2012 8:17 am

    This dude is the gift that keeps on giving.

  37. Anonymous / Feb 7 2012 4:37 pm

    Here is a debatable comment for you….Why would a person believe in a higher power they have zero proof for?

  38. Anonymous / Feb 6 2012 8:30 pm

    Taking all bets! What is going on with the author of this august blog?
    2-1 odds for Poe!
    3-1 for mild schizophrenia.
    5-1 for angry teenager who has learned to use big words like ‘argumentum ad hominem’.
    10-1 for narcissistic personality disorder.
    1000-1 for PZ Meyers’ evil twin!

    Any takers, ladies and gentlemen?

    • Anonymous / Sep 15 2012 7:24 am

      Narcissistic personality disorder. You’re on !

    • TriCountySyndicate / Apr 3 2013 5:57 pm

      I have my own category, bigoted conceited smart individual who abuses knowledge and is on the wrong end of the spectrum.

  39. rustywheeler / Feb 6 2012 8:27 pm

    I was reading it but I got bored because I’m so freaking brilliant and the author’s self-evident weaknesses aren’t very challenging.

  40. Sam Barber / Feb 6 2012 7:54 pm

    Okay,all, time to vote. Reply to this with your vote.

    I vote Poe’s Law.

    • rustywheeler / Feb 6 2012 8:28 pm

      I vote “young self-absorbed prick”.

    • Chris P / Feb 7 2012 12:04 am

      I vote delusional religious freak.

    • juegoconfuego / Jun 19 2012 2:55 am

      Poe’s Law seems the obvious route, but just look at how much time he puts into this. I mean, it’s pathetic really. I vote narcissistic personality disorder

      • itsnobody / Jan 11 2014 12:03 pm

        LOL, every time atheists lose ALL they can do is throw personal attacks at people,

        They suck, are delusional, and feel that bad that I win every time.

  41. Lance Baker / Feb 6 2012 6:16 pm

    I think I’ve found a home for this intellectual giant!

    http://www.tencommandments.org/index.html

  42. I’m calling this a Poe.

    Either that or Metacrock has some serious competition in the misguided ego department…

  43. itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 3:42 pm

    Well this is boring now and becoming repetitive so I’m not going to respond to any comments on this article any longer, at least for now.

    We can see from the comments here from atheists that atheists are stupid, idiotic people who value authority and incredulity above everything else and are basically subhuman in terms of intelligence.

    Here’s a summary of atheists’ responses:
    - Ad hominems (“He’s crazy, an idiot, thinks he’s smart, self-delusional, made some grammar error, etc…”)
    - Straw man
    - Baseless statements

    How boring and un-challenging for me….but then again what more can we expect from subhuman atheists?

    I don’t know how anyone can be gullible enough to believe what atheists say.

    • Captain Earlobe / Feb 6 2012 6:21 pm

      You accuse atheists of using ad hominem attacks, yet you repeatedly refer to them as “subhuman” and call them “stupid”. Definitely trolling.

  44. it's easy, you know? / Feb 6 2012 12:38 pm

    So much to work with here…so little time, so I’ll take the simplest mistake/flaw, one that happens to be my pet peeve.

    You wrote, “My innate ability for argumentation logic is probably as high or higher than the innate ability that Euler or Ramanujan had for theorems and mathematics.”

    It’s not even worth addressing whether the statement is true, I merely wonder why somebody as brilliant as you could not have expressed it in a manner that was grammatically correct. Written properly, it would read, “My innate ability for argumentation logic is probably as high as or higher than the innate ability that Euler or Ramanujan had for theorems and mathematics.” Without that second “as,” the sentence just doesn’t make sense. You see that, don’t you. Of course you do, you’re brilliant.

    • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 1:56 pm

      Thanks for the laugh. Recognizing arguments has nothing to do with prescriptive grammar rules, so your argument is another form of an argumentum ad hominem. Faraday had used poor spelling and grammar as well, lots of people have and still do.

      I am actually not sure if it is not grammatical or not….”as high or higher than” vs. “as high as or higher than”, can you point out which grammatical rule this breaks?

      Millions of articles on the internet use the same phrase that I did “as high or higher than” so if it really is not grammatical then why would it matter, it would just be another useless prescriptive grammar rule that has no value or meaning in reality. Lots of times I speak informally, so it doesn’t really matter.

      Here’s one from a WebMD article:
      “Child abuse and neglect are rampant in the U.S., and the annual cost is as high or higher than the cost of other major health problems, the CDC reports” – http://www.webmd.com/parenting/news/20120201/in-dollars-alone-cost-of-us-child-abuse-high

      Here’s one from a University web site:
      “Its total forage production is usually as high or higher than small grains, but most of this production occurs in early fall and late spring” – http://www.psla.umd.edu/extension/publications/foragefacetsno7.html

      Here’s another from a University web site:
      “These are particularly troublesome when scanning half-tone magazine or newspaper photos, where the dot spacing may be as high or higher than the sampling frequency.” – http://www.wfu.edu/~matthews/misc/DigPhotog/alias/

      Here’s one from an article that appeared in the Journal of Physiology:
      “The rate of sweating was as high or higher than Eresp.” – http://jp.physoc.org/content/417/1/421.full.pdf

      So since physicists, doctors, scientists, biologists, writers, etc…have used the same phrase that I have even if it is not grammatical it would simply be a grammatical error that lots of people make that just doesn’t matter, and therefore indicates nothing.

      I can literally find millions of articles using the same phrase.

      So even if this is “not grammatical” it would indicate nothing, nothing at all, it would prove nothing, show nothing, and do nothing to refute any statement that I made.

      Stupid atheists, even if someone does make a grammatical error then what does that refute? The answer is nothing, so it’s just a form of an argumentum ad hominem.

      Since you have claimed that it is not grammatical without pointing out which grammatical rule it breaks your claim is also baseless or lacking reasoning.

      I think atheists should try harder, but then again, which atheist can ever stand up to me? Just more ad hominems.

  45. peteykins / Feb 6 2012 12:23 pm

    This is the funniest blog ever.

  46. isaac / Feb 6 2012 12:17 pm

    “Q: What is your I.Q.?

    “A: I have no idea. People who boast about their I.Q. are losers.”–Stephen Hawking

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/12/magazine/12QUESTIONS.html

    • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 3:50 pm

      Yeah I agree with Stephen Hawking that people who boast about their IQ are losers….so this would mean that atheists are losers for boasting that atheists have higher IQs, right?

      lol whenever the subhuman atheist mind speaks all they can do is embarrass themselves

      • Chris P / Feb 6 2012 10:44 pm

        and you can do what? Given that expertise is gained by the number of hours practicing one’s craft how would a religious person make up the hours wasted praying and a church?

        The Chinese don’t go to church and are eating our lunch. Proof positive.

  47. MNb / Feb 6 2012 12:05 pm

    I’m disappointed you have revealed us only how you re-invented Ockham’s Razor and not the wheel.

  48. Kian Mead / Feb 6 2012 10:49 am

    I am on a higher plane of intellectual existence than you, and see that you have been deluded into thinking in warped ways…..

    I am higher in intellect than any god that has ever been written about.

    I have greater logical clarity than any religious man in history.

    In fact, I would be a theist, only if I believed myself to be god. Proof of my power, the sky will tumble, the birds stop singing and the universe will cease to exist, when I die.

    But I don’t. I am an atheist.

    • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:47 pm

      Well then by what reasoning have you concluded that you have a greater logical clarity?

      Oh wait I forgot atheists don’t use reasoning, they use ad hominems, incredulity, and straw man!

      As for my reasons, I have independently re-derived Ockham’s razor, figured out that all logical fallacies are simply violations of Ockham’s razor, and have the ability to explain in high details why an argument is illogical, all without any formal knowledge of argumentation logic.

      • Chris P / Feb 6 2012 10:45 pm

        You don’t invent new things and solve problems with ad hominems oh clueless one.

        You are just so out of touch with reality. How many patents do YOU have?

      • dafydd / Dec 10 2012 9:35 pm

        Bollocks

  49. itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 7:34 am

    Well I declare myself the winner of this debate so far.

    How boring and un-challenging.

    By what reasoning have these subhuman atheists concluded that I am delusional? Which one of my statements is flawed or incorrect? All of them are true are flawless.

    I have asked atheists for reasons and all they have are ad hominems.

    Hey look I’m a subhuman atheist “You see since I’m an atheist I know that you can refute a statement by throwing personal attacks at a person….like say for instance if someone claims that the Earth revolves around the Sun, I can refute that statement by accusing the person of suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect or being a crackpot or self-delusional…checkmate!”

    Hey look I’m a subhuman atheist “You see since I’m an atheist I know that you can show that something is true by pointing out if an authority figure says so or not….like say for instance if authority figure says that black holes do not exist true that would be equivalent to evidence that black holes do not exist….checkmate!”

    I don’t even know how it’s possible for anyone to be as stupid as an atheist. Who can drop to the atheist level of stupidity?

    It’s always a great laugh to see an atheist open up that slick thick atheistic skull, they are truthfully the dumbest forms of life.

    Silly atheists, you’re just no match for me, all you can do is copy from what I and other Theists taught you.

    • Sam Barber / Feb 6 2012 9:19 am

      Poe’s law at work?

      • Zak / Feb 6 2012 10:42 am

        Yeah, I’m pretty sure it’s Poe’s law. Either that or a 16 year old.

      • Don Cameron / Feb 6 2012 1:08 pm

        It’s Poe’s law and a 16 year old. Notice how it constantly claims that it’s bored. Maybe it should find a girl or boy or animal to have some kind of meaningful relationship with. Even if it’s just its own hand.

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:24 pm

        I am not actually 16 years old, I am in my early 20s, but why would my age matter? And why would it matter if I was bored or not?

        It’s just another ad hominem.

        It’s quite obvious from these comments from atheists that atheists obviously understand very little to nothing about logic.

      • juegoconfuego / Jun 19 2012 3:01 am

        His blog is Poe’s Law. Interestingly though, the comment that you replied to is Danth’s Law.

    • Mark Farris / Feb 6 2012 12:24 pm

      Mr. Nobody, some people try to dazzle with brilliance, some try to baffle with bullshit. You have done neither. Skip esoteric speculation for a moment and explain in simple terms what Moses and his crew did with the 32 thousand virgin Midianite girls? In your wisdom, can you explain just what the priests did with their share of little girls? You know the story don’t you Mr. Nobody? Numbers 31 in the bad book if you need to refresh your simple mind.

    • Mark Farris / Feb 6 2012 1:10 pm

      Mr. Nobody, if you truly are a masterdebater, could you explain why Lot got both his daughters pregnant? I’m sure you know where to find that in the bad book, Genesis 19.
      Hey, I just read some of your stuff. That short piece on the hurricane makes me wonder. That work you had to do before school, was that homework, for school that day? Do you ride a bus to school? Is that bus of a different length than the buses everybody else rides?

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:20 pm

        Hi there Mr.Fool,

        Where in this article have I claimed that I am believer in Biblical inerrancy?

        It’s just another straw man.

        Atheists should keep posting comments, it is just funny to see their level of stupidity.

    • Anonymous / Feb 7 2012 4:24 pm

      UMMM, What debate have you won?? Sorry, don’t see any debate, just you mentally masterbating yourself to climax.

      • Anonymous / Mar 30 2012 3:03 am

        Oh… yes… Logical fallacy’s… yes.. YES… OH GOD YES…

  50. itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 6:53 am

    Wow how boring are these comments…..

    So you all have ridiculed me, and claimed that I am delusional, crazy, etc….but by what reasoning?

    Which statement of mine is flawed?

    Is it defining Ockham’s razor as “making the least possible amount of assumnptions”?
    Is it claiming that all logical fallacies are simply violations of Ockham’s razor?

    All of my statements are true and flawless. All I see here are lame ad hominems.

    I don’t blame atheists for having nothing to say besides ad hominems, they are subhuman in terms of intelligence and basically incapable of independently reasoning anything, all they can do is copy.

    • Sam Barber / Feb 6 2012 9:15 am

      You can star with this claim: “Around 2007 upon arising from higher states I started awakening this strange innate ability for argumentation logic that I have which surpasses even Aristotle and William of Ockham.”

      Anything there we shouldn’t laugh about?

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:58 pm

        It doesn’t really bother me if people find my story to be laughable. Why should I become disturbed?

        It’s just another form of an argumentum ad hominem.

    • Anonymous / Jun 25 2012 11:10 am

      since you mentioned it, yes, “all logical fallacies are simply violations of Ockham’s razor,” is not merely false, it’s silly. If for instance I make the argument, “q follows from p. p is true therefore q is true,” my error is certainly not a simple violation of Ockham’s razor. In fact Ockham’s razor doen’t have much to do with logical fallacies at all. Rather, it is a principle for choosing between two theories when both are logical.

  51. Alexander Poisson / Feb 6 2012 6:39 am

    Clear case of paranoid delusions of grandeur.

  52. David Rutten / Feb 6 2012 5:05 am

    It’s is one of my life-long dreams to watch a freight-train wreck up close (but not so close to get hurt obviously). I think I finally got my wish.

  53. sceptical theist / Feb 6 2012 4:47 am

    Prove it. Nullius in verba.

  54. PaulB / Feb 6 2012 4:33 am

    “From time to time a human being arises with an extraordinary ability to go above and beyond a normal human….”

    Reminiscent of the psychopathic Locke in Orson Scott Card’s Enders Game, minus the characters inate genius and force of argument.

    itsnobody has read the book many times I suspect.

    • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 6:56 am

      So why would it matter if it’s reminiscent of a psychopath or not? It’s just another lame ad hominem

      “I think Newton was like a psychopath, so yeah Newton’s theorems are wrong”

      What a delusional.

      Have fun with your delusional atheist friends living in their delusional “authority and incredulity is all that matters” world.

      • Sam Barber / Feb 6 2012 9:11 am

        There is nothing delusional about the lack of evidence of any of the 2,500+ deities people currently believe in, Itsnobody.

        Get a grip on reality, sonny.

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 3:05 pm

        I did not claim that there was anything “delusional about the lack of evidence of any of the 2,500+ deities people currently believe in” in this article…it’s just another straw man.

        If you want to post atheistic arguments then freely do so on my other article.

      • Zak / Feb 6 2012 10:46 am

        It is illogical to complain about ad hominem arguments when you post about how great you are (and by comparison how much everybody else must suck). In this case ad hominem arguments are on topic and not fallacies.

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:51 pm

        lol…how are the argumentum ad hominems here not fallacious? You have not explained because atheists don’t use explanations, just baseless statements.

        So go ahead and explain to me with your subhuman mind how someone claiming that they are great indicates that ad hominems are on topic and not fallacious?

        This entire time no one has refuted any statement that I have made. It’s just ad hominems, straw man, and the typical baseless responses from atheists.

  55. itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:18 am

    How boring these comments are just the common lame ad hominems “you’re crazy, an idiot, delusional, etc…” wtf?

    But I doubt the subhuman atheist mind can even understand what an argumentum ad hominem is.

    I can help the subhuman atheists understand why it’s illogical if they need further clarification, lol.

    Just face the facts atheists, against me you’ve met you’re one and only match, that’s why all you have are lame ad hominems.

    In the delusional atheist’s world:
    “Newton was a crackpot, so Newton’s geometric proofs must be wrong”
    “Ramanujan had no college education and flunked out of college more than once, so his theorems are wrong”
    “Faraday had no education after the age of 13, so his experiments and ideas are useless”

    What does throwing personal attacks at me do? The answer is it does NOTHING to refute any claims I made.

    Atheists should just stick to throwing lame ad hominems since they lack the ability to reason anything.

    • jkp / Feb 6 2012 4:56 am

      But I doubt the subhuman atheist mind can even understand what an argumentum ad hominem is.

      Seriously? Seriously!? You, my friend, are hysterical.

    • Zak / Feb 6 2012 10:49 am

      I think it is funny how you answer one ad hominem with another. Really classy like. (For clarification, I’m being sarcastic).

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:35 pm

        I think it is funny that you do not understand the difference between name-calling and an ad hominem.

        If I claim that someone is foolish and then go on to refute their statement, that’s not an ad hominem, it’s just name-calling.
        If I claim that someone is foolish without refuting their statement, then that would be an ad homninem.

        I always have to teach the subhuman atheists about logic and reasoning since they understand nothing about it, all they can do is copy, not independently think.

  56. Anonymous / Feb 6 2012 1:59 am

    I’m not sure he learned proper grammar with his heightened states of mind…

    • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:25 am

      Proper grammar or prescriptive grammar is just man-made rules that have no basis in linguistics.

      Also anyone can make spelling or grammar errors while typing quickly (especially on this laptop keyboard).

      Also when people have highly original thoughts it is often difficult to express those thoughts in words, so expressing highly original thoughts may cause one to violate prescriptive grammar rules.

      In other words using proper grammar is really an indication of nothing.

      • trog69 / Feb 6 2012 3:32 am

        Thiis are ezactly right! You are mostly geniuse! I’m too fast for these key to cacheup to my mindtoo!

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 7:03 am

        Except that intentionally misspelling things doesn’t refute what I said about prescriptive grammar, fool.

      • Sam Barber / Feb 6 2012 9:07 am

        Last I heard linguistics is man-made, too.

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 3:12 pm

        Well that’s true, but prescriptive grammar rules have nothing to do with the structure of language, they just have to do with man-made rules that people agree to.

        Take for instance the difference between saying “drawed” and “drew”. In reality “drawed” should be valid but because of prescriptive grammar rules people decided that you should say “drew” instead, why? Because some people said so, not because it has anything to do with the actual structure of language.

  57. Anonymous / Feb 6 2012 1:50 am

    Man, people are just the worst.

  58. Nobull / Feb 6 2012 12:47 am

    Please get help

  59. Human Ape / Feb 6 2012 12:18 am

    I don’t think the asshole is letting any more comments get in.

  60. Human Ape / Feb 6 2012 12:17 am

    He’s an idiot but unfortunately he’s no more insane than most Christian tards.

  61. Anonymous / Feb 5 2012 11:37 pm

    Dunning-Kruger FTW.

    • Andrew / Feb 6 2012 12:22 am

      Beat me to it. Also, /facepalm.

    • Stephen / Feb 6 2012 4:33 am

      Haha… yes, a classic example. But how old is this nutbar?

  62. Sam Barber / Feb 5 2012 10:17 pm

    We definitely have an illustration of the Dunning-Kruger effect at work with Itsnobody. I hope you get yourself some help.

    • Stephen / Feb 6 2012 4:35 am

      Yes, that seems to be the general consensus. Delusions of grandeur also at work I suspect.

  63. Ambidexter / Feb 5 2012 9:40 pm

    With the highest innate ability for argumentation logic (probably the highest that ever existed), high intelligence, high intuition, and high originality

    Your self-delusion is also high but your modesty level is low.

  64. Chris P / Feb 5 2012 9:36 pm

    Oh – I see now. He has no ads so he’s looking for traffic so he can make money. Wonder why he doesn’t just do it the way regular Christian beggars do it.

    They just start websites claiming that the government is going to make everybody gay or have an abortion and the only way to stop it is to send money NOW.

    • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 6:48 am

      Why would I care about money for? If I gain money I will still be able to experience anger, distress, and unhappiness…so how can money be what I’m seeking?

      • Zak / Feb 6 2012 10:52 am

        I’m going with the hypothesis that itsnobdy is like 14. Only somebody who doesn’t have to make rent would say that.

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:29 pm

        Once again, I ask subhuman atheists the question of why would someone’s age matter?

        A 14-year old can make a valid statement and a 42-year old can make an invalid statement. You can’t show that a statement is valid or invalid by pointing out someone’s age fools (atheists, it’s the same thing) unless of course their statement is directly connected to age.

        If people wonder why I consider atheists to be subhuman in terms of intelligence, just read the comments here from atheists.

      • Zen Galacticore / Dec 31 2013 3:52 am

        What you are is delusional. You are an egocentric, self-important, self-absorbed, narcissistic WANNABE megalomaniac. In other words, you’re not charismatic or smart enough to be a true megalomaniac. Hitler, or the emperor Domitian maybe, but not you.

  65. Chris P / Feb 5 2012 9:32 pm

    Please let us know where you have written peer reviewed articles or papers? Please let us know what mind boggling inventions you have made? Do you design anything? Do you have any patents?

    If you are so proud of yourself and make such a point of you virtuousness why don’t you publish your name and qualifications. Surely with god on your side with his inerrant words you have nothing to fear?

    • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 5:17 am

      I haven’t published any peer reviewed articles or papers yet….but why would that matter?

      Oh wait I forgot all that matters in science now that atheists have taken over is authority and incredulity instead of what’s actually valid and true.

      Contrary to what delusional atheists believe something existing in peer-reviewed journals doesn’t make it valid, and something not existing in peer-reviewed journals doesn’t make it invalid. I’ve read so many things in peer-reviewed journals that contain flaws and errors.

      Maybe eventually I will publish articles, but what do you mean about nothing to fear since God is on my side?

      • IanKoro / Feb 6 2012 10:30 am

        The point is that you haven’t accomplished anything of intellectual note, and despite the fact you’re quite skilled at telling everyone how smart you are, you’ve done nothing to demonstrate it.

        The difference between intelligent people, and people who simply believe themselves to be smarter than everyone else, is that intelligent people actually possess the capacity for self criticism and reflection. You seem to totally lack this ability.

        Your screed about how atheists have ruined science, for example, is a complete joke. All you’ve demonstrated is that you know nothing about science beyond what you’ve seen on TV or read online. Are you honestly unaware of the criticism of string theory Because you clearly don’t have the slightest understanding of the observations and math that support it… and comparing string theory to intelligent design? You do realize that one is a complex theory based on mathematical proofs and serious observations, and the other is basically just some people saying “Well, *somebody* musta done it!”

        I have debated with many knowledgeable people who I disagreed with, and who possessed a solid grasp of logic. You’re not demonstrating any of those traits. You just seem like some kid who got into some arguments with a few people who didn’t know what they were talking about, and somehow this led you to believe you were the smartest debater on the planet, which is actually pretty hilarious.

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:55 pm

        lol…to summarize your argument “You are wrong because I say so”

        You have claimed that I lack intelligence but have not given any reasons.

        If you want to discuss the string theory, then please post your arguments under my string theory article so I can entirely destroy you.

        So your whole response is just “I say he’s wrong because I say so, yeah I say so”

        As for being the smartest debater in the world or in all of human history, I really am, but that’s really a subjective opinion (unless of course you a found a way to objectively measure it).

  66. Callum James Hackett / Feb 5 2012 9:16 pm

    With such unprecedented levels of intelligence, what on earth are you doing wasting your time blogging about it? You ought to be out seeking governmental power so that you can put your miraculous talents to actual use.

    • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 5:40 am

      Well not exactly unprecedented levels of intelligence….it only works for argumentation logic

      Why would I care about seeking government power? I don’t get it…all that stuff is temporary, also if I gain government power I would still be able to experience anger, distress, stress, unhappiness, etc….so why would having government power matter to me?

      • Zak / Feb 6 2012 11:11 am

        Don’t you have a moral compass? Are you so selfish as to keep you gifts to yourself and not improve the world?

  67. AE3Kr0n / Feb 5 2012 8:12 pm

    You should keep ALL OF IT A SECRET dude! Don’t let anybody know, just keep it all to yourself. After you’ve become rich and famous with your secret knowledge, come back and let us know how you did it. OK?

    • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 5:24 am

      Why would I care about becoming rich and famous? That is all temporary and meaningless to me.

      What I actually care about is bringing out this enjoyment already within

  68. Me / Jan 24 2012 1:11 pm

    Fucking LOL

  69. Doubting Christopher / Jan 23 2012 11:32 pm

    “Who am I? Around 2007 upon arising from higher states I started awakening this strange innate ability for argumentation logic that I have which surpasses even Aristotle and William of Ockham.”

    “My innate ability fo…r argumentation logic is probably as high or higher than the innate ability that Euler or Ramanujan had for theorems and mathematics.”

    This is on a Conservapedia level of blatant stupidity. Either a really blatant poe, or the mutant lovechild of shockofgod and the timecube guy. Alternate hypothesis: It’s the repository for future fox news stories.

    • AE3Kr0n / Feb 5 2012 8:17 pm

      Wow. I just looked up Time Cube guy, and found this really horrible, huge fonts (with colors) website spewing something I didn’t understand. Is that the time cube guy?

      • Zak / Feb 6 2012 11:09 am

        yes, yes it is.

  70. Todd / Jan 23 2012 4:28 pm

    Your about section reads like a textbook example of someone suffering from narcissistic delusion. I genuinely feel sorry for you. Please seek help.

    • Eric / Feb 6 2012 10:21 am

      I concur. At first I was tempted to ridicule the grandiosity and arrogance of the writer but the more I read the more I believe this has to be a mental illness – unless maybe he is Lex Luthor.

      • itsnobody / Feb 6 2012 2:56 pm

        Claiming that I have a mental illness is just an argumentum ad hominem.

        It’s just like I said before, if anyone wants to know why I consider atheists to be subhuman in terms of intelligence just read their comments, it’s all a joke.

  71. Steve / Jan 5 2012 11:46 pm

    Dear Child,

    I am a mere 14 year old, yet I see through your silly ways. I got high with chuckie, from chuckie cheese one time, and i saw shit you couldn’t begin to believe.

    Keep it real nigga.

    Warm Regards, and Fire Crotches,
    Steve

  72. Menn Vest / Dec 5 2011 3:29 pm

    A number of genuinely fantastic information, Gladiolus I detected this unique.

Trackbacks

  1. Another nobody « Cubik's Rube
  2. Soft, squishy, mushy fodder | Pharyngula

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers

%d bloggers like this: