Skip to content
January 30, 2012 / itsnobody

Top 10 Questions for Atheists

Here are some questions I have for the lowest of the low, the worst people, the most disgusting form of life, the most hateful of all human beings, the lowest possible form of existence – the atheist.

The questions are in descending order (from #10 to #1).

#10 – Do you take pleasure in telling lies or are you just so gullible that you believe any anti-religious lie you hear?

#9 – Are you only capable of mimicking and copying arguments you heard from Dawkins and other atheists?

#8 – What’s the reason that you continue to use racist atheists as viable sources, celebrate racist atheist biologists and racist/atheist countries?

#7 – Do you have any independent mind of your own or ability to question what other atheists say or think?

#6 – Why do you consider any criticism of atheists, atheistic arguments, or atheistic beliefs as “trolling” but not consider condemning, ridiculing, or making fun of religion as “trolling”?

#5 – Why have you intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism but not silent in opposition to Intelligent Design, Creationism, and many other things?

#4 – Why do you value high IQ as being worth more than contributions?

#3 – Why do you discourage belief without evidence, intuition, and originality?

#2 – Why are you an anti-science fanatic who strongly opposes free and open criticism, scrutiny, and questioning?

#1 – Who do you hate more, Jews or Muslims?

I’m looking forward to some answers to these questions if subhuman atheists have any answers.

About these ads

217 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Ryan Schick / Jul 31 2014 8:51 am

    itsnobody bullies atheists that don’t argue.
    And then when they finally do, he/she/plant/dirtmind complains that 100% percent of them are illogical.
    Who’s being illogical here?

  2. Ryan Schick / Jul 31 2014 8:48 am

    10 questions for itsnobody:
    #10 do you enjoy bullying atheists? #9 why do you complain atheists don’t argue then complain atheist arguments are illogical?
    #8 What gave you the idea to judge people by where they live?
    #7 what do racism and subhumanity have to do with eachother?
    #6 why can’t you back up the claim that all atheist arguments are illogical?
    #5 who filled you with so much hate?
    #4 how do you know that I am racist?
    #3 since when were atheists anti-science?
    #2 Why can’t you back up the claim that atheists oppose questioning and free and open criticism?
    #1 Do you really think all of us are gonna believe you are working on a time machine?

  3. Ryan Schick / Jul 27 2014 4:01 pm

    #10 I should ask you this question, except replace anti-religious with anti-atheist.
    #9 Again I should ask you this question except replace Dawkins with Hagee or Stein and other atheists with other theists
    #8 Idaho is a very theistic state and one of the most racist. So I don’t know why you always complain about atheists being racist.
    #7 Yes I actually do, but you yourself probably got that mind that doesn’t exist from your parents.
    #6 I don’t think all criticism of atheists is “trolling”. maybe some, like coming from you. And I think criticism of religious beliefs can be trolling, like “Theists think that some wizard created everything with the snap of his fingers and sacrificed himself for it by getting himself hung on the cross, think logic, theists.” that’s trolling. But something not trolling would be “why do theists thing god doesn’t need a creator, but the universe does?”
    #5 Because atheists beliefs aren’t mainly racist or even racist in the first place.
    #4 IQs aren’t even accurate, it just shows how smart you are in 1 subject.
    #3 Seriously? You don’t even give evidence that everything in the bible is real.
    #2 You are then only person on the face of this earth that thinks that atheists are anti-science.
    Oh wait, do you mean one of those atheists who wear shirts with skulls or evolutionists that their life is based on science? A higher percentage of all atheists like science than theists like science. I said percentage, not amount of people idiot.
    #1 I don’t hate either, both are kind people.

  4. Bryan Clark / Dec 24 2013 3:09 pm

    Excuse you, satan, i think you have it backwards. This is supposed to say “believers” instead of “atheists”, as every one of these things does not apply to any atheist i know, but to almost every believer ive had to interact with.

    • brandon / Mar 17 2014 9:52 pm

      hey you atheists are way meaner to us than you are to us

      • tahmidk15 / May 1 2014 4:29 am

        We are not mean but we are not asses. You preaches holy nonsense, we replies with hard reality.
        We don’t believe in anything but theist believe in all sort of fairy tell and miracles and supernatural events, all kind of hokas pokas.

        We are neutral but theist are propagandist. They have to preach their holy nonsense to everyone, other wise burn in hell, any punishment = hell, burn in hell, what the hell !!!

        Theist always claim that they know everything. If they are sure that there is an after life, then why are you living here, do some good work and die for eternal peace.

        We (atheist) don’t want to fight with anyone, but if you collide with our thinking and reasoning, we can destroy theism with facts and evidence.

      • Ryan Schick / Jul 27 2014 4:02 pm

        That makes no sence whatsoever.

  5. Felipe / Jul 27 2013 7:51 pm

    #10 – Do you take pleasure in telling lies or are you just so gullible that you believe any anti-religious lie you hear?
    Science has the proof for everything

    #9 – Are you only capable of mimicking and copying arguments you heard from Dawkins and other atheists?
    Nope. Mendel is Christian and he is the father of Genetics. And it wasn’t because of the bible, but research.

    #8 – What’s the reason that you continue to use racist atheists as viable sources, celebrate racist atheist biologists and racist/atheist countries?
    I don’t celebrate anything about it. If Darwin is considered a New God for Atheists, I don’t care. For me, he is a sceptical person who investigated to bring his research to the world.

    #7 – Do you have any independent mind of your own or ability to question what other atheists say or think?
    Yes I have. Not all of them has a reason to be right. The way of finding truth is with contundent proofs.

    #6 – Why do you consider any criticism of atheists, atheistic arguments, or atheistic beliefs as “trolling” but not consider condemning, ridiculing, or making fun of religion as “trolling”?
    There are different kind of people. My wife is Catholic, and first she didn’t want to marry a non-Catholic person, as me (I’m a sceptical person. I think I still can find faith). I needed to respect all of their rituals (baptism, for example) to be married with her, and I did without problems. But as seem, you just found non sceptical people who call themselves atheists with the reason of the world, who keep trolling and saying God Is Dead and all of this. They don’t know what respect is, that’s all.

    #5 – Why have you intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism but not silent in opposition to Intelligent Design, Creationism, and many other things?
    I suffer from Racism and I’m against it. We are all the same, I can’t understand how white people think they are superior, can’t even understand the origin of the aryan race. I’m not against Creationism, I’m against all that religious imposition against the people. Can’t stand Israel-Palestina conflict, because it is nonsense. For me, Intelligent Design is just something that needs more proof. If they get more proofs, they will find a reason and people will be convinced.

    #4 – Why do you value high IQ as being worth more than contributions?
    I have a normal IQ. Atheists are like everyone, but with a belief only they will understand. We don’t if it’s correct or not, but time will tell.

    #3 – Why do you discourage belief without evidence, intuition, and originality?
    I cannot discourage without evidence. Can’t be a rebel without a cause.

    #2 – Why are you an anti-science fanatic who strongly opposes free and open criticism, scrutiny, and questioning?
    I am tolerant. I question everything my mind picks on curiosity. When I talk to learn, I listen and catch their idea. But I research.

    #1 – Who do you hate more, Jews or Muslims?
    I hate haters, like the one who made these questions, and the atheists who blame christians for being idiots. I hate this kind of people.

    • brandon / Mar 17 2014 9:53 pm

      yeah call everybody who’s not you an idiot that’s real tolerant

  6. anti snoring / Jun 28 2013 2:27 am

    Hi there! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which
    blog platform are you using for this site? I’m getting sick and tired of WordPress because I’ve had problems with
    hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  7. Yves / May 27 2013 7:26 pm

    @ it’s Somebody 
    aka Sugarcanegray aka the vile Usurper.  

    Hi, you finally escaped from bedlam ?
    Sorry retard , I haven’t much time for you, but I promise I will do my best to let you you my thoughts soon.

    • Anonymous / May 27 2013 9:34 pm

      Once again caught red-handed.
      This sugarcanegrey is really a loser.

  8. Yves / May 14 2013 9:09 pm

    You Sugarcanegray really deserve a special award for your fantastic imagination and your unseen impersonation. What a contribution to the world your mother did by delivering such a lovely cuckoo !
    At least, you made progress : first you impersonated me, then you believe you are GOD. 
    Perhaps you should stop whacking off before Hitler’s portrait and try to fuel the conversation about atheism with relevant arguments. 
    Now you implicitly assert that the atheists have squared the circle with the christian morality by opposing the evil. Really ? 
    Why would an usurper  -who cynically turns a blind eye to the communist support to extermination of handicapped by the nazi and Holocaust of the Jewish, for instance- oppose child molesters ? 
    My guess is that you also do not you know that child abuse is a sadistic crime. So what is sadism ? As an ignorant nazi troll ,you probably don’t know that “sadism” is derived from the name of a renowned hard-core militant atheist who publicly promoted incest and rape with the support of the many Christian-haters of his time. 
    Sade presented the destruction of morality precisely as a project    which the Enlightenment ideal of progress demanded, expressing this aim by availing himself of Enlightenment talk of an increase in freedom and rights. According to Sade, philosophy helps us to extend our rights by freeing us from a heteronomous morality imposed from outside. Morality as well as belief in God was to be subjected to the test of reason, and God’s existence exposed as a ‘chimera'; there are no spiritual substances but only matter in motion, and morality has no divine lawgiver to establish and guarantee it. Sade deprives moral norms of their traditional objective validity by exposing them as merely relative to our habits and prejudices.Nothing stops us from pursuing our desires at the cost of others, and nothing is more satisfying than exercising our will to destroy and to inflict cruelty. Sade regarded nature, which acts destructively, as demanding from us (as it were in the place of God) the harming and destruction of others. As the former notes, De Sade raises aggression and cruelty to a ‘moral’ norm that should be pursued, so that doing cruel things is made a requirement of a ‘law’ of nature: every failure to act with cruelty is a crime against nature.This would establish a distinct tradition of atheist amoralism and which would find clear echoes in the atheistic work of Nietzsche in the nineteenth century. 
     
    Sade’s viewpoints influenced the social-Darwinists (whether they were nazi or communist) and obviously inspired most anonymous criminals and rapists all around the world. Coincidentally he was a cynical Christian-hater like you. 
     
    Why then are you speaking about children that much ? 
    I’m quite sure the way you like children is not compatible with the moral standards of Christian countries which consider that rape is an unforgivable sin (while the atheists denigrate the notion of sin which defines the Good and the Bad).  
    This is the meaning of perversion, isn’t it ?
    Most people around the world find highly ironical that the pervert atheists try to make believe that suddenly atheism perfectly matches with the Christian’s commandments by opposing rape. 
    It cannot be coincidental that most wanton brutalities are influenced by atheistic propagandists ; it’s just history : the legacy of atheism. 
    Try again , how can you reconcile atheism with morality ?  
    By saying that priests who lose faith turn bad and act like atheists ?

    Change weigh class Sugarcanegray ; you’re unsavory when not a pervert. 

    • Yves / May 14 2013 11:48 pm

      Hey Benny Hill , want to know more about this atheist son of a bitch ?

      Sade according to the University of Cambridge 

      • Ryan Schick / Jul 27 2014 4:04 pm

        Are you a Jehova’s witnesses? ’cause you are hateful to all atheists.

    • Yves / May 14 2013 11:49 pm
    • Yves / May 14 2013 11:54 pm

      I may be as drunk as Sugarcanegray,but my link does not work.
       Try this :http://www.investigatingatheism.info/atheistamoralism.html 

      • Kermit / May 15 2013 12:12 am

        Atheism is for cool people.

        Yves you are not cool. You are a complete fuckwit, knob end, frog rapist.

        Atheists are cool, because they don’t believe in shit ideas without evidence.

        And all the evidence points to you being 100% a twat of magnitude 7.

        Christians who HATE atheists are not very good Christians. They are just fuckwits. I am an atheist, but I don’t hate, or even dislike Christians, but for you Yves, I make an exception. You are the crusty shit left on a festival portaloo toilet seat. You are the afterbirth of a malformed camel. You are the most misinformed stupid, bigoted, absolute fuckwit this planet has ever seen. And I’ll give you yet another hint. I am not sugarcaneray. I am your worst enemy, other than truth itself.

        Back in your straightjacket you ugly psycho. Stop shitting your pants in public. Don’t say another word. The World, and everyone in it, hates you.

      • Yves / May 19 2013 2:50 pm

        @ sugarcanegray aka Kermit the crypto-nazi troll.

        I’m properly speechless. You’re so unique !
        I’m scratching my head wondering what else can I add to your usual scatological poetry.  Your girlfriend must feel herself very lucky to have such a refined man in her bed. I’m quite sure she makes no difference between you speaking and you farting. 
        You’re so elegant ! 

  9. Anonymous / May 12 2013 5:58 pm

    sugarcanegay , yves beats the shit out you. In this battle you’re Chael Sonnen , he’s Jon Jones.
    Switch weight division , try featherweight or female bouts.

    • God / May 13 2013 12:38 am

      Such blasphemy. This is THE LORD speaking. Yves beats the shit out of no one, except out of children with his dick. Yves is a child rapist. This sugarcane guy is not I, I am THE LORD.

      Cower in fear, Anonymous Yves fucker. Yves has been smited. He is dead. He is in Hell. You are next.

      • Anonymous / May 19 2013 5:06 am

        Usurping names is nasty.

      • Jesus Christ / May 19 2013 8:56 am

        Anonymous, being a demented fuckwit like Yves or the itsnobody piece of shit who devised such fucked in the head questions in the first place is nasty. Pretending to be a fictional character is obviously hilarious. Why don’t you calm your stupid Christian head down, and cut the crap? Yves and itsnobody are sodomising each other as we speak. They are mental midgets. Religion is shit, but proving to the world that the religious are also shit is not a hobby they should pursue. Peace brother, and may evidence based logic rationalism be yours.

      • Yves / May 19 2013 2:52 pm

         @ sugarcanegray aka the usurper.

        Didn’t you notice that you wrote 100% of the scatological comments on this page ?    Do you have the trots or something ?  

        No doubt that you’re a true atheist. 

  10. Yves / May 9 2013 2:48 pm

    @ sugarcanegray ,

     
    To avoid ad hominem attacks you can legitimately use many different unused nicknames if you want -or write anonymous posts – but the willingly usurpation of someone’s identity makes you the vilest human being on Earth. 
    I’m quite sure you also read the mails of your neighbours , spy your coworkers and steal you boss.
    You are really the best ambassador of atheism.
     

    • God / May 9 2013 2:51 pm

      Yves, you are a paedophile by your own omission.

      Lots of religious men are child rapists. You are in good company. I send them to Hell and they will be flayed down to their bones with hot metal whips whilst listening to Wham records.

      You’ve got that to look forward to. You sick perverted bastard.

      • Yves / May 9 2013 3:11 pm

        @ sugarcanegray

        Are you short of ammo ?
        Go back to you favourite aryan’s website , you will probably find some insults your grandfathers used when they were in the Hitler’s youth.

         
        By usurping my identity , you have crossed the red line between the Good and the Evil. Only GOD – the real one – knows how far you can go. 
        One can only conclude that you are an immoral being. Isn’t it highly ironical that such a vile human being is lecturing on child abuse ? 
         

      • God / May 9 2013 3:24 pm

        Yves, you child-arse-and-billy-goat-fucker. I am God. I am not SugarcaneGray. Show some respect. Show some manners. Kill yourself. You are not needed here. You are needed in Hell. You will be smited.

      • Yves / May 9 2013 3:47 pm

        @ sugarcanegray ,

        Ok Benny Hill , it was very funny.
        Thanks for your contribution. 
        It’s time to go back to your low life. 

        Have you finished to read the mails you stole in the girls next door mailboxes ?

      • Anonymous / May 19 2013 7:19 pm

        You’re certainly neither Jesus nor GOD , you’re just wasted if not going mental.
        Pretending to be a fictional character is hilarious ? It could be if you weren’t malevolent.
        Would you be happy if someone usurps your fictional name (sugarcanegrey or whoever you are) and puts fictional pedophile comments on some websites ?
        If you have something relevant to say no need to impersonate anyone.
        You atheists always make me throw up.

  11. Yves / May 9 2013 2:19 pm

    @ sugarcanegray ,

    You are just an impersonator ; you wrote comments under the nickname of others just like you act in everyday life. The usual atheist manners to lay with girls : cheats , tricks and lies.

    You are a degenerated usurper.

  12. Anonymous / May 3 2013 10:43 am

    I hope you realize you’re committing a logical fallacy by asking loaded questions, nevertheless, i will play along.

    #10 – Do you take pleasure in telling lies or are you just so gullible that you believe any anti-religious lie you hear?
    I actually try to confirm every dubious statement regardless of its stance on religion. Do you believe the absurd claims in the bible/quran/torah ?

    #9 – Are you only capable of mimicking and copying arguments you heard from Dawkins and other atheists?
    I will admit that I have mimicked and copied Dawkins and Hitchens quite a lot, but I usually come up with my own rebuttals in arguments.

    #8 – What’s the reason that you continue to use racist atheists as viable sources, celebrate racist atheist biologists and racist/atheist countries?
    I myself,contrary to most atheists, am a scientific racial realist who doesn’t ignore the fact that there are physical and cognitive differences between races, but also doesn’t see anyone as inferior or superior. Many, in fact most, politically correct liberal atheists would like to think otherwise, but I prefer not to deny what is obvious. If you consider atheist countries (Sweden, Norway, Denmark etc.) to be racist then you are clearly a misinformed or willfully ignorant human being. These countries tolerate millions upon millions of immigrants. Compare these countries with the most religious countries like the gulf states in which migrant workers are openly discriminated against or Russia, the stronghold of neo nazism.

    #7 – Do you have any independent mind of your own or ability to question what other atheists say or think? Yes, and hearing this from a theist is quite ironic.

    #6 – Why do you consider any criticism of atheists, atheistic arguments, or atheistic beliefs as “trolling” but not consider condemning, ridiculing, or making fun of religion as “trolling”?
    Criticism is not trolling, I’m happy to listen to any critique of irreligiousness that you may have and would like to be allowed to criticise religion. Making fun of religion is trolling but it’s a free world go ahead and troll atheism for all we care we usually don’t mind. Despite what you tried to imply in your loaded questions Theists are the ones who get all whiny.

    #5 – Why have you intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism but not silent in opposition to Intelligent Design, Creationism, and many other things? I live in an muslim country and have to remain silent to everything, however if my country decided to legalize the enslavement of a particular race I would fight hell to stop it.

    #4 – Why do you value high IQ as being worth more than contributions?
    I don’t, I respect Andy Warhol (IQ of 86) much more than any lazy non contributing genius with an IQ of 170+ .

    #3 – Why do you discourage belief without evidence, intuition, and originality?
    I don’t discourage belief, I refute arguments for it, and I will convert for evidence.

    #2 – Why are you an anti-science fanatic who strongly opposes free and open criticism, scrutiny, and questioning?
    Oh the irony.

    #1 – Who do you hate more, Jews or Muslims?
    I don’t hate anyone, but as an ex-Muslim I would rather live in a Jewish society.

    • Yves / May 4 2013 11:18 pm

         I myself,contrary to most atheists, am a scientific racial realist who doesn’t ignore the fact that there are physical and cognitive differences between races, but also doesn’t see anyone as inferior or superior. 
       

      Last time an atheist told me he is a scientific atheist he was in fact a nurse.
      Most renowned scientist were theists…except the nazi scientists. 

       Making fun of religion is trolling but it’s a free world go ahead and troll atheism for all we care we usually don’t mind.  

      Posting a comment on some atheist blogs may be very dangerous ; believers are often insulted and threatened, then posts are deleted to make people feel atheists are tolerant and respectful.

       Russia, the stronghold of neo nazism.  

      Russia is far to be a religious country. Vladmir Putin was a KGB agent ; that means he couldn’t have been a Christian (believers are discriminated when not segregated in the many concentration camps, in communist countries) .As many Russian atheists, he turned to Christianity at the collapse of the Soviet Empire , to make believe he is not amoral ; but he is a fake Christian.

      Ironically, the stronghold of the neo nazism are the former atheistic communist countries , as if atheism logically paves the way to wanton brutalities. 
       

  13. DVD Bach / Apr 8 2013 8:06 pm

    You know what, I’m outta here. I’m not going to encourage this stupid, belligerent fucktard. Seriously, this guy’s like a monkey throwing shit.

    You’re all invited to check out my blog:

    http://dvdbach.blogspot.com/

  14. Yves / Apr 8 2013 8:41 am

    @ DVD Bach,

    please, insert the link about Anders Breivik Christianity. I have downloaded his “2083” manifesto , and reporters in France ( his father used to live in France ) have proved to atheists that he is just as baptized as Stalin was… Does it make Stalin a Christian ?
    Breivik clearly said he is not a believer… And I wll prove it if you dare keep on saying the opposite.

    About the faith of Hitler : maybe you should read Eva Braun’s diary. According to her, Hitler clearly spat on Christianity… Maybe you should Google some Hitler’s Youth songs which are clearly anti-Christians.
    And , nazis who were hanged after the Nuremberg trial rejected the presence of a religious cleric before their execution. They even answered to the jewish psychiatric who last interviewed them that they do not believe nor in heaven neither in hell.

    Just check if you please.

    • DVD Bach / Apr 8 2013 12:42 pm

      “please, insert the link about Anders Breivik Christianity. ”
      I’ve provided the citation; go get it yourself.

      “Does it make Stalin a Christian ?”
      I don’t know. Did Stalin say, “I consider myself to be 100% Christian”?

      “And I wll prove it if you dare keep on saying the opposite.”
      I dare.

      “Hitler clearly spat on Christianity”
      How arrogant of you to assume that yours is the only religion.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 1:37 pm

        So I will answer you the same way :

        – I have no evidence Breivik said he is 1% Christian.
        – how arrogant are you to assume you are not the liar you seem to be.
        – I provide a citation of Breivik : ” atheists like incest ,I know it because I am an atheist”. Go get it yourself…
        You are right… You just don’t know !

      • DVD Bach / Apr 8 2013 6:33 pm

        ” I have no evidence Breivik said he is 1% Christian.”
        I provided it.

        ” how arrogant are you to assume you are not the liar you seem to be.”
        I can support my claims.

        ” I provide a citation of Breivik : ” atheists like incest ,I know it because I am an atheist”. Go get it yourself…”
        That’s not a citation. What’s your source?

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 5:15 pm


        Jean-François Mayer, historien des religions, a épluché le manifeste de 1500 pages rédigé par le suspect Anders Behring Breivik. Il écarte l’étiquette de «fondamentalisme chrétien». «Cela n’a rien à voir avec du fondamentalisme chrétien» comme souvent évoqué par la police et les médias, affirme M. Mayer.


        Jean-François Mayer, an historian expert in religions,vetted the 1500 page manifesto redacted by suspect Anders Behring Breivik. He rejected the “Christian fundamentalist” label. “This has nothing to see with some sort of Christian fundamentalism” as police forces and some media first said, confirms M. Mayer.

        Breivik is not a Christian fundamentalist

      • DVD Bach / Apr 8 2013 6:29 pm

        Strawman. The claim was not that he was a Christian fundamentalist, but that he was religious at all. You’ve claimed he’s an atheist and have yet to support that claim.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 11:46 pm

        I have never say he is not a Christian atheist.  
         
        … it’s required that you are a practicing Christian, a Christian agnostic or a Christian atheist   ( cultural Christian ). The cultural factors are more important than your personal relationship with God , Jesus or the Holy Spirit.   
         

      • Yves / Apr 9 2013 12:12 am

        A Christian who claims that it is not important to believe it is like an atheist who claims that he believes “Jesus is my saviour”.

    • Chris / Apr 15 2013 4:43 am

      Are you people so stupid as to believe that any Christian can do no wrong? Are you really that asinine? You do realize less than 0.2% of people in prisons for America alone is Atheist right? They have a 10%+ population in the US. Do some f*cking math once in a while. Anders Breivik is a CHRISTIAN who wanted to protect CHRISTIAN identity in Europe from Islam, how hard is that to understand?! This debate has been going on and on for ages now. He was against National Socialism in the sense that the government is set up to fight it in every which way possible, that’s the only reason he wasn’t one.

      http://info.publicintelligence.net/AndersBehringBreivikManifesto.pdf

      Notice the big red cross? Yeah it’s a cross, what else do you think it’s for but Christianity?
      Notice in his contents he has CHRISTIANITY EVERYWHERE. He talks about the slavery of Europe, the crusades, the kidnapping of over a million Europeans into North Africa predominantly female, the great rape of Europe, the ottoman invasion into Europe – everything. He rejects Christian fundamentalism BECAUSE THERE ARE PAGANS AND ATHEISTS LIVING IN EUROPE TOO WHO HAVE A SAY AND RIGHT TO BE THERE. Being a Christian Fundamentalist is about the same as being an Islamist, he would be persecuting his own people, EUROPE IS NOT JUST CHRISTIAN. And any non-white which I’m sure this blog has been made by is a non-white, you touch any Pagan, Atheist or Christian in Europe and you will be damn sure European Christians, Atheists and Pagans from all over Europe will be coming for your hides. Our differences are ours and ours ALONE to sort out, not you invaders. Oh did you read the part about Breivik talking about evacuating all Christians from the Middle East? Yeah of course you didn’t.

      • Yves / Apr 15 2013 8:07 am


        Notice the big red cross? Yeah it’s a cross, what else do you think it’s for but Christianity?

        Breivik used the Christian cross as the symbol of the rejection of Muslims during the Middle Age because he wanted to gather Whites whatever are their beliefs.
        Breivik assert he is compatible with Christian atheists as though Christianism is definitely not compatible with any sort of atheism. No Christian would allied with atheists. Christianism is closer to Islam and Judaism than atheism because we have the same God. The Quran also speaks about Jesus…
        Not atheism.

        Also notice that Svatiska is a Buddhist symbol. Not much to do with the Christian culture but White nationalists tried to gather Christian Europeans to fight back Jewish under the aegis of this asian philosophical symbol. Is Buddhism responsible for Holocaust ?

      • Yves / Apr 15 2013 8:50 am

        On a compatibility scale ( graduated from 1 to 3 ) with Christianity  :

        3 – Protestantism , Catholicism and other religions based on the New Testament.
        2- Judaism and Islam. 
        1- Atheism. 

        Read Thessalonians 2:2 about apostasy. 

        Sorry I sometime uses Christianism which is a French word .
         

      • It's somebody / May 27 2013 10:43 am

        Yves, you are an anti-semite too? A cluster fuck of hatreds you are. Fascist and Christian often go together.

        Dumb, fascist, demented, Christian.

        Seek professional help or please suicide. It’s the only constructive things you can do to help the world.

  15. Some random atheist / Mar 25 2013 1:12 am

    WHO ARE YOU TALKING TO YOU NEED TO BE TAUGHT ABOUT NOT BEING RACIST YOURSELF. AND I DON’T HAVE A MORAL

    • itsnobody / May 26 2013 5:09 pm

      Oh just read comments from atheists here and look at 100% of atheist countries like Denmark, Sweden, New Zealand, etc….and we can see that atheists are the most racist people that exist, the most disgusting that exist, and truthfully the worst of all subhuman beings.

      If atheists are anti-racist then how come they never oppose racism?

      There is no such thing as a non-racist atheist country, they are the worst.

      • It's somebody / May 27 2013 10:41 am

        Again, you don’t know what the fuck you are talking about.

      • itsnobody / May 27 2013 2:42 pm

        But I do, I’m 100% certain of myself, your response again is just a boring ad hominem “I say he’s wrong and he doesn’t know what’s talking about”

        Don’t you fools (atheists) get tired of making baseless statements over and over again?

  16. Dvd Bach / Feb 10 2013 10:18 pm

    “Do you take pleasure in telling lies or are you just so gullible that you believe any anti-religious lie you hear?”
    Since this question is addressed to me personally, I do not answer it on behalf of atheism. Personally, neither.

    “Are you only capable of mimicking and copying arguments you heard from Dawkins and other atheists?”
    Since this question is addressed to me personally, I do not answer it on behalf of atheism. Personally, no.

    “What’s the reason that you continue to use racist atheists as viable sources, celebrate racist atheist biologists and racist/atheist countries?”
    Since this question is addressed to me personally, I do not answer it on behalf of atheism. Personall I find this to be a loaded question because it makes false assumptions about me.

    “Do you have any independent mind of your own or ability to question what other atheists say or think?”
    Since this question is addressed to me personally, I do not answer it on behalf of atheism. Personally, yes on both.

    “Why do you consider any criticism of atheists, atheistic arguments, or atheistic beliefs as “trolling” but not consider condemning, ridiculing, or making fun of religion as “trolling”?”
    Since this question is addressed to me personally, I do not answer it on behalf of atheism. Personally, I find this to be a loaded question because it makes false assumptions about me.

    “Why have you intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism but not silent in opposition to Intelligent Design, Creationism, and many other things?”
    Since this question is addressed to me personally, I do not answer it on behalf of atheism. Personally, I find this to be a loaded question because it makes false assumptions about me.

    “Why do you value high IQ as being worth more than contributions?”
    Since this question is addressed to me personally, I do not answer it on behalf of atheism. Personally, I do not understand the question. Please clarify, and I will be happy to address it.

    “Why do you discourage belief without evidence, intuition, and originality?”
    Since this question is addressed to me personally, I do not answer it on behalf of atheism. Personally, I find this to be a loaded question because it makes false assumptions about me.

    “Why are you an anti-science fanatic who strongly opposes free and open criticism, scrutiny, and questioning?”
    Personally, I find this to be a loaded question because it makes false assumptions about me.

    “Who do you hate more, Jews or Muslims?”
    Since this question is addressed to me personally, I do not answer it on behalf of atheism. Personally, I’d want to know what they’ve done to me.

  17. Alessio Curuizia Jr. / Jan 8 2013 2:23 pm

    WOW, How objective this is!! This wouldn’t have been written by a God fearing,
    superstitious,”If you don’t practice my religion you’re sub human and going to
    HELL!”,War mongering for your “Religious Cause” sort of bible thumper, Now
    would it?? And I’M STILL on the fence about whether there is a Higher Power
    or not. Worth posting twice.

  18. Alessio Curuizia Jr. / Jan 8 2013 2:21 pm

    WOW, How objective this is!! This wouldn’t have been written by a God fearing,superstitious,”If you don’t practice my religion you’re sub human and going to HELL!”,War mongering for your “Religious Cause” sort of bible thumper, Now would it?? And I’M STILL on the fence about whether there is a Higher Power or not.

    • itsnobody / May 26 2013 4:58 pm

      You’re just using straw man statements and stereotypes.

      I don’t label atheists as subhuman beings for not following me, but mostly for being racist.

      • It's somebody / May 27 2013 10:46 am

        Subhuman? WTF?

        Do you know you deserve to have the shit kicked out of you for that?

        Where do you live, shitforbrains, I mean it’snobody? I want to kick you good.

        You deserve to be left for dead with bruising all over your body.

        Your very existence is offensive to me.

      • itsnobody / May 27 2013 2:40 pm

        Of course you are subhuman to me.

        Your responses are just boring ad hominems.

        I already explained in detail how the atheist population directly causes racism and White Nationalism , and so far every atheist response has re-confirmed my hypothesis.

        The main reason why the atheist population causes racism and White Nationalism is because the atheist population directly causes opposition towards racism and White Nationalism to cease.

        It’s always been your low-life atheist kind causing racism, always.

        People have to realize that all atheists are in on this together as one, just look at all the racist comments from atheists with no atheist responding back opposing or criticizing them. They only oppose people who criticize atheists for being racist, that’s what they label as hate-filled and hate speech.

        If atheists aren’t even willing to oppose racism in the form of a comment (something that requires very little effort) we can already predict that they won’t oppose other racist atheists (once the atheist population goes up the population of racist atheists will go up).

        Even worse than not opposing racism, atheists try to stop people from criticizing atheists for being racist (thereby allowing racist atheists to be as racist as they want).

        Making atheists look like good people matters much more to atheists than ending racism, they are such disgusting selfish low-acting subhuman beings.

        All racists need is lots of people who don’t oppose them, which a high atheist population will ensure.

        When an atheist sees a racist comment from an atheist they respond by:
        – Remaining silent in opposition to racism
        – Or agreeing and supporting the racist

        When an atheist sees someone criticizing atheists for being racist they respond by:
        – Trying everything they can to stop the person
        – Accusing the person of being hate-filled, spreading hate speech, trolling, etc…

        So we know what’s atheists really disagree with, it’s people criticizing atheists for being racist. The less people oppose and criticize racism the better it is for racists, so atheists are only helping out the racists.

        It’s already happened in 100% of modern day atheist countries like Denmark, Sweden, New Zealand, etc…which are all extremely racist nationalist countries

        I’ve predicted which countries are next based on the rising atheist population: Australia, Canada, The Netherlands

        I’m sure that it’s true, so I’m still preparing for what’s going to happen in the US soon once the atheist population goes up.

        Every atheist I’ve met is a racist, I’m still waiting for the day that I meet a non-racist atheist.

        Truthfully there is no lower form of life that exists, atheists are subhuman beings, the lowest

        I encourage all to view atheists as subhuman beings (unless they give up their racism and oppose racism which will obviously never happen)

  19. sugarcanegray / Jul 22 2012 7:55 pm

    #10 No and I rarely tell lies and I try and research things I hear where possible.
    #9 No
    #8 Never had done.
    #7 Yes – as atheists we constantly question each other. Open discourse is thoroughly encouraged. We constantly question the existence of God, too.
    #6 I don’t consider them trolling.
    #5 I have never remained silent in regards to racism. I oppose any form of bigotry targeted at traits that are nothing to do with choice.
    #4 I don’t.
    #3 Because anything asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Without evidence, the belief is utterly meaningless and pointless.
    #2 I do not oppose questioning of any kind, nor am I anti science.
    #1 neither. I don’t hate anyone. I feel sorry for their dogma, but I do not hate either group. I do disapprove of a lot of their practices. But there’s no hate.

    Here’s a question for you. As an atheist, I’m 99.999999% sure there’s no God. But, I’m willing to concede there’s an outside possibility of a God existing. This is the standard atheistic view point. As a theist, are you willing to acknowledge that you could be wrong about your belief in God?

  20. leebo / Apr 29 2012 3:51 pm

    10. I try my best not to ever lie. Have you ever heard the term “loaded question”? I have a feeling you are full of them.

    9. I consider arguments from both sides and evaluate them objectively. That’s how I left my religion and no longer believe in a god or gods.
    8. I’m not quite sure who you are referring to, but one can be wrong on one subject and still correct on others, so your question is irrelevant.

    7. Of course I have an independent mind. And I find that, in general, we skeptics are less likely to have a sheep mentally than our religious counterparts. We aren’t the ones who tout obedience and submission as some kind of virtue.

    6. I don’t. You generalize a lot.

    5. Ummm. I am personally very opposed to racism. Most other atheists I know also consider it childish and awful. Do you really think atheists are racist for some reason? I’ve never heard that one before.

    4. In terms of what? What kind of contributions? What are you talking about?

    3. Good question! I believe things only when there are good reasons to believe them, such as evidence. I do this because it provides me with a filter that protects me from believing th
    ings that aren’t true. There are a lot of people in the world who profit from gullibility. From the psychics to the boner pill salesmen to the thousands of religions in the world, they are all looking for money. I don’t buy into them until they can provide evidence that they are telling the truth.

    2. I’m not. That is an outrageous claim. But I think I know what you are getting at. We don’t want pseudo-scientific nonsense taught along side well established science in the public classrooms because the aforementioned nonsense has not gone through the process of rigorous testing and peer review. Once it passes scientific muster among the experts, THEN it can be introduced into public classrooms.

    1. Jews. Just kidding I don’t hate anyone. This is a ridiculous question.

    I have one question for you: have you ever sat down and talked to an atheist and actually listened?

  21. itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 12:44 am

    Well after reading these comments I guess my next post should be “Common Lies Spread By Atheists” in order to educate the delusional gullible atheists about science, logic, and history.

    It seems that atheists must have gotten all their information from the low-life atheist media. They probably watch The Simpsons and Family Guy and really believe that it’s factually accurate…lol.

    If I don’t educate atheists, then who will?

    • concernedperson@fuckadog.com / Feb 16 2012 3:08 am

      You honestly think you are smarter than all the people you insult just by existing?

      There is no fucking god you stupid fucking retard.Get that through your thick retarded mind.

      Don’t you dare do a Breivik on us. That Norwegian retard is a helluva lot like you.

      Stop it. Stop it. Stop it. Blog no more. You are a waste of space. You think you have got logic and rhetoric down pat. You ignore things that people say because you view them as as hominem. Do you really think these people are wrong? They’re not wrong. They’ve got you sussed.

      Now grand master logician what are all your conclusions if your axioms are wrong?

      Axiom #1 – you say there is a god. You have absolutely zero proof or evidence for it. Therefore you can’t assume your axiom is correct. To a sane person this makes sense.

      Therefore everything you believe is wrong.

      • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 11:46 am

        Hi there concernedperson@fuckadog.com,

        If you want to post an atheistic argument then freely do so on my other post http://itsnobody.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/free-and-open-challenge-to-atheists/

        This section is just not suitable for that, I will just go too far off-topic.

      • Yves / Apr 7 2013 7:21 pm

        Anders Breivik is an atheist.
        He claimed in his manifesto he is not following Jesus and during his trial he never mentioned God , Jesus or Christianity.

      • DVD Bach / Apr 7 2013 9:37 pm

        False! Here’s a direct quote from his manifesto:
        “”At the age of 15 I chose to be baptised and confirmed in the Norwegian State Church. I consider myself to be 100 percent Christian.”

        You should really stop talking now; you’re only embarrassing yourself.

    • havennyx@gmail.com / Feb 16 2012 2:46 pm

      I don’t watch television. I came to my own conclusions about why religion has no place in my life. I reached this conclusions AFTER reading the bible.

      I thought Christianity was supposed to be about tolerance and acceptance. Perhaps you should try showing some?

  22. itsnobody / Feb 15 2012 7:13 pm

    How disappointing, the majority of these answers aren’t even answers to the questions, atheists simply change the subject, throw ad hominems, and create straw man, as usual.

    Well I guess that’s all I can expect from atheists, the worst of all humans who are always threatening mankind and holding back science.

    I guess that’s all I can expect from the subhuman atheist mind.

    • Concerned person / Feb 15 2012 7:20 pm

      You, Mr It’sNobody, are seriously demented. You have no grasp of reality. You are incredibly hateful and unintelligent. You have absolutely no manners and absolutely no idea. People are laughing at you and also scratching their heads. You are a pathetic little man.

      • itsnobody / Feb 15 2012 7:28 pm

        You Mr.Concerned Person have no idea what an argumentum ad hominem is, no grasp of what it is….lol

        It was a nice try though

        Atheists should keep posting their laughable comments to clearly show how they are subhuman in terms of intelligence.

    • Chris / Apr 15 2013 5:36 am

      Oh yeah you’re one to talk Mr. “I don’t know how we were made, I’ll just say it’s the invisible Jew-loving fairy in the sky” guy. Seriously, f*ck off from Europe you monkey, it’s obvious you people can’t sustain a Nation let alone a neighborhood for too long without whitey to back you up. You’ve shown countless of times you can NEVER mold to our way of living, you keep making stupid statements that have no base what-so-ever in an intelligent white conversation.

      It’s no wonder white people whether Christian, Catholic, Pagan or Atheist/Agnostic wants you gone, you are suitable only for Witch-craft, cannibalism and raping everything including goats.

      http://mypenmypaper.wordpress.com/2009/08/01/re-nigerian-man-caught-having-sex-with-goat/

      And even a bigger sin, you terrorize the women of European descent like a bunch of f*cking dogs, and no matter what faith we believe in we will force you out together, this bullsh*t necessitates the highest sanctions which go beyond our argument over what we believe in.

      Here’s where Christianity lies and where they want you to go, whether or not I agree with Christianity is irrelevant, they want you gone, and so do I, we can sort out our beliefs later.

      Instead of judging white people and Atheists for racism why don’t you look at yourself and the hate YOUR race has committed regardless of belief, before you even talk about white people and theirs. You will soon find your people groveling in the desert from whence you came. Your questions are completely retarded and arrogant beyond anything I have ever seen, no matter what white people believe in or don’t believe in, we will ALWAYS be above you, you’re a primitive stepping stool in evolution, get used to it!

      • itsnobody / May 26 2013 4:11 pm

        Oh Mr.Fool, what “race” do you think I am of?

        Also where does your atheist kind get ideas like this from that I think that “I don’t know how we were made, I’ll just say it’s the invisible Jew-loving fairy in the sky”?

        It’s just a straw man, God had never been defined as a sky-fairy, how can your atheist kind be this foolish?

        The sky-fairy argument is not mentioned by Theists in Early Middle Ages, Middle Ages, or Late Middle Ages. They believed that God was the Creator of the Universe, first cause, had no ordinarily visible image and was all-existing, not a bearded man in the sky or whatever as the gullible atheists believe.

        How can atheists really be this stupid? If God had been defined as a “man in the sky” like the fools (atheists) constantly claim then why isn’t it mentioned in any argument in the Early Middle Ages, Middle Ages, or Late Middle Ages for?

        I’m sure you get historical information from cartoon shows and stuff, because atheists are universally stupid people.

        Oh well at least you can re-confirm that atheists are extremely gullible and also extremely racist.

        Have fun living as a low-life gullible racist/atheist!

      • It's somebody / May 27 2013 10:50 am

        Nobody You are a degenerate kind of human. Hate filled and irrational. It doesn’t matter if your black or white, your brains are poo coloured brown.

        Atheism is cool. Rationality is cool. Logic is cool. Loving your fellow human beings is cool.

        You are uncool.

        As for gullible. You still believe what the priest told you when you were 4 years old? Come on grow up. Part of being an adult is working that one out.

      • itsnobody / May 27 2013 2:32 pm

        Nobody You are a degenerate kind of human. Hate filled and irrational. It doesn’t matter if your black or white, your brains are poo coloured brown.

        Atheism is cool. Rationality is cool. Logic is cool. Loving your fellow human beings is cool.

        You are uncool.

        There’s nothing logical or rational about atheism, as usual a low-life atheist like you only responds with personal attacks and ad hominems, just like a typical fool (atheist)

        There is no logical atheistic argument and there is nothing logical about being an atheist, they are disgusting people

        If atheists disagree with racism then why didn’t you respond back to Chris opposing his racism? You didn’t, and atheists never do oppose racism, they only oppose people who criticize atheists for being racist claiming that they are hate-filled for opposing racism, that’s it.

        As for gullible. You still believe what the priest told you when you were 4 years old? Come on grow up. Part of being an adult is working that one out.

        It just shows how gullible you are, my Dad and Sister are atheists, and my Mom is mostly non-religious.

        But in either case you would just be using the typical psychology argument, and also an argument from personal incredulity.

        You can’t determine whether or not a belief is true or false by determining the psychology behind the belief fool (atheist).

        It’s just like someone saying “You learned at age 4 that 2+2 = 4, therefore 2+2 != 4, it’s time to grow up”. As usual all atheistic arguments make absolutely no sense.

        You can learn all types of true things at the age of 4, in something called “science” (which atheists naturally hate and oppose) the way that you determine if something is true or false is by empirically testing the hypothesis, not by determining the psychology behind the belief.

        I feel bad for destroying you, I kill atheistic arguments off with ease.

  23. Anonymous / Feb 15 2012 8:13 am

    one question….where is your joke of a god???

    • itsnobody / May 26 2013 8:58 pm

      The God that I speak of isn’t a joke, He always rests within all things.

      I think that eventually I or someone else will scientifically l prove it, but it seems to be more difficult to prove than say scientifically proving the existence of multiple time-lines or an afterlife.

      I’m working on a physics model that will hopefully explain mostly everything, but right now I’m just focusing on the parts that I NEED for the advanced technology that this physics model will open up.

      The type of technology that this physics model will open up is far beyond the imagination of the wildest science fiction authors, it should enable me to do virtually anything…

      One of the main reasons I’m trying to figure this out is because I already know about the upcoming racism that’s coming soon to the US once the atheist population rises, so I have to figure a way out…

      • It's somebody / May 27 2013 10:38 am

        Dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb.

        You aren’t clever enough to do jack shit itsnobody. A physics model proving the existence of your sky fairy? Yeah, right? They put people like you in special hospitals.

        You, your God, your religious beliefs, your unwarranted prejudices are all second rate, third rate even. You are not an intellectual. You are a dumb, ugly facist, thick as shit, anti-intellectual. You have nothing to offer the world except a lesson that not all humans are clever enough to be part of the conversation.

      • itsnobody / May 27 2013 2:54 pm

        Dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb, dumb.

        You aren’t clever enough to do jack shit itsnobody. A physics model proving the existence of your sky fairy? Yeah, right? They put people like you in special hospitals.

        lol, you probably don’t understand the first thing about physics. I’m sure you don’t know what Maxwell’s equations is (just mentioning this throws an atheist into confusion, lol).

        I’m 100% certain of myself, and the only thing preventing the truth from coming out seems to be the atheist kind.

        I would explain some of the concepts in the physics model I’m working on or give you a hint, but you don’t seem like a very intelligent person so I won’t.

        I know that even if I succeed with my physics model if I attempted to release it it would probably just be suppressed or ignored because of authority and incredulity. But still, knowing the truth, why should I become disturbed?

        Atheists can’t hide and suppress the truth for too long, I’m guessing they can only suppress the truth for a maximum of 5000 years.

        No other group of people have held back the advancement of science as much as atheists have.

        Of course I’m still struggling to figure out the part that I need for the advanced technology (in the physics model I’m developing), if I do figure it out then I will most likely keep it a secret (for a while) because:
        – It would probably be denied or ignored since all that matters in modern times is authority and incredulity
        – I don’t feel that the world is ready for such knowledge
        – Such knowledge can easily be used to do terrible things
        – The government will probably have a problem with things that threaten the US economy or national defense too much

        If I do figure it out, then I will probably:
        – Give a demonstration on my blog (something highly unlikely to be a hoax or coincidence)
        – Gain authority (probably in an area that’s still open like mathematics)

        Of course my ultimate goal eventually in time would be to:
        – Eliminate all forms of suffering people experience on Earth, and usher the beginning of a Utopia-like world

        This all depends upon whether or not I succeed, I just hope I figure out the part that I need within 10 years or less.

        Atheists are so stupid, if I gain authority then make the exact same statements all of a sudden it would become more valid to them, lol, that’s what modern science is about, just authority (and also incredulity).

        Your only response this entire time has been ad hominems (you can look up what that means if you want), don’t you get bored of this?

        Accusing me of being dumb and throwing other personal attacks at me, doesn’t refute any statement that I made.

        You also continued to use the straw man “sky-fairy” argument that I already debunked. Where did you get the idea that God was a “sky-fairy” (even though it’s not mentioned as an argument by Theists in Early Middle Ages, Middle Ages, or Late Middle Ages) from?

        The mathematician Leonhard Euler argued with many atheists, but he didn’t mention God as a “sky-fairy” in his arguments (this was back in the 1700s), lol.

        If God existed prior to the Earth and universe, how could God be a man in the sky?
        If God is all-existing then how could God be a man in the sky?
        If God is a man in the sky then why did Jesus and Moses not mention it, not define God as existing within the sky, and not tell anyone to pray to the sky?

        Why did Jesus discourage people from thinking of what he called the ‘kingdom’ as a place in the sky?
        – “Now having been questioned by the Pharisees as to when the kingdom of God was coming, He answered them and said, “The kingdom of God is not coming with signs to be observed, nor will they say, ‘Look, here it is!’ or, ‘There it is!’ For behold, the kingdom of God is within you.”
        – Jesus said, “If those who lead you say, ‘See, the Kingdom is in the sky,’ then the birds of the sky will precede you. If they say to you, ‘It is in the sea,’ then the fish will precede you. Rather, the Kingdom is inside of you, and it is outside of you.”

        I have discovered much about this entity called ‘Jesus’ and know that His life and existence was different from what many currently believe, the truth about Jesus will probably please and displease many.

        It just shows how gullible of a person you are.

        Hey look I’m atheist “On TV and paintings I saw that God was a sky-fairy, so it must be, it doesn’t matter that it was never mentioned as an argument by Theists”

        I don’t know how anyone can be this gullible and stupid, atheists are basically subhuman in terms of intelligence.

        You, your God, your religious beliefs, your unwarranted prejudices are all second rate, third rate even. You are not an intellectual. You are a dumb, ugly facist, thick as shit, anti-intellectual. You have nothing to offer the world except a lesson that not all humans are clever enough to be part of the conversation.

        Incapable of doing anything besides throwing ad hominems, yet I’m the dumb one? ROFL!

        Throwing personal attacks at me refutes nothing that I’ve said (just ad hominems, how boring).

        What unwarranted prejudices? Are you saying that opposing racism is an unwarranted prejudice?

        I think you and all your other low-life atheist friends belong in mental hospitals, they are only capable of throwing personal attacks at people, very rarely have anything valuable to say (just mostly ad hominems and that’s it), and accuse people who oppose racism as being prejudice.

        The one who sounds anti-intellectual is you and most of your other atheist friends who do nothing but repeatedly throw ad hominems.

        Just read my comments and responses and look how at low clear and concise it is then read the fools (atheists) responses.

        You’ve proven that you’re not clever enough to take part in a conversation, just read your own baseless mindless ad hominem responses.

        Thanks for proving how weak-minded, disgusting, inferior, and unintelligent atheist are. They aren’t smart enough to do anything.

        I can already predict your response “Man he’s so wrong, and dumb, and wrong, and dumb, he belongs in a mental hospital, and I repeatedly say he’s dumb and wrong, he’s so wrong, I repeatedly say so, but I didn’t refute anything statement that he made, but he’s wrong, and dumb, he’s wrong”

        So boring, can’t you fools (atheists) come up with anything better?

        I actually don’t mind personal attacks that much if they’re accompanied with actual arguments (in that case it would be name-calling not an ad hominem).

        I guess atheists as a whole just aren’t intelligent people, you and your other atheist friends continue to prove this.

  24. Rajesh Dudeja / Feb 15 2012 7:21 am

    Here are some answers I have for the self-professed highest of the high, the self-professed best people, the self professed most highest form of life, the self-professes most loving of all human beings, the self professed highest possible form of existence – the idiot theist.

    The answers are in descending order (from #10 to #1).

    #10 – Do you take pleasure in telling lies or are you just so gullible that you believe any anti-religious lie you hear?

    I don’t have a belief system so it must be that i take pleasure in exposing lies of Bible, Torah and Koran.

    #9 – Are you only capable of mimicking and copying arguments you heard from Dawkins and other atheists?

    Yes i am quite capable of copy-pasting but not only Dawkins etc. I am also capable of copy-pasting verses from Bible and Koran. You want some ?

    #8 – What’s the reason that you continue to use racist atheists as viable sources, celebrate racist atheist biologists and racist/atheist countries?

    As per biology there is no race among Humans. Humans is one race. I use racist atheists/biologists/countries because they know how to differentiate between human race and races other than humans. While the theists are stuck at ethinicity, classism, casteism, pigmentation, language to use tools for their divisive ideas that they call racism. In biology and among atheists, such bigoted racism holds no value.

    #7 – Do you have any independent mind of your own or ability to question what other atheists say or think?

    I don’t have an independent mind from my brain and not only i question but nip in bud any moronic idea irrespective of the quarter it comes from.

    #6 – Why do you consider any criticism of atheists, atheistic arguments, or atheistic beliefs as “trolling” but not consider condemning, ridiculing, or making fun of religion as “trolling”?

    Wrong. I am trolling on you right now.

    #5 – Why have you intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism but not silent in opposition to Intelligent Design, Creationism, and many other things?

    I have not remained silent to any of above mentioned moronic ideas from theists be it racism or ID.

    #4 – Why do you value high IQ as being worth more than contributions?

    The internet on which you have posted these questions is the contribution of high IQ. The vaccinations you can send to Africa are contributions of high IQ. The language you can use in scriptures are contributions of high IQ. High IQ is the engine that creates what contributions can deliver.

    #3 – Why do you discourage belief without evidence, intuition, and originality?

    Why should I encourage any closed-ended inquiry ?

    #2 – Why are you an anti-science fanatic who strongly opposes free and open criticism, scrutiny, and questioning?

    I am anti Theological-science fundamentalist because science is and has to be based on fundamental laws of universe with built in error-check mechanism while theology is based on Absolutist Book. Both are incompatible. Now get that fuckin church out of face of science.

    #1 – Who do you hate more, Jews or Muslims?

    Neither. I don’t hate people. I am not a theist. I hate ideologies. And I hate Islam more than Judaism although both are equally idiotic but not equally dangerous.

    – As answered by a Human Atheist.

    • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 11:41 am

      lol this post was funny so I guess I should respond to another subhuman atheist.

      #10 – So you don’t have a set of mutually supportive beliefs?

      #9 – By answering ‘yes’, you’re saying that you’re only capable of mimicking and copying arguments you heard from Dawkins and other atheists, do you realize that?

      #8 – lol…it’s irrelevant if you label something as an “ethnic group” or “race”, it’s just semantics. Also 100% of atheist countries are the most racist in the world, where as religious countries are far less racist. Just look up what Richard Dawkins, Richard Lynn, James D. Watson and other liberal atheists have claimed.

      #7 – By independent mind I meant the ability to formulate your own thoughts, arguments, and ideas.

      #5 – Except that Richard Dawkins, Richard Lynn, and James D. Watson are all atheists and the most racist countries are atheist/agnostic/non-religious countries.

      #4 – Not exactly. Many contributions don’t require a high IQ at all. Lots of geniuses like Henri Poincare, Julia Robinson, and Richard Feynman did not have super-high IQs.

      The internet uses IPv4…so I’m not sure it’s a high IQ contribution. Vaccinations don’t really require a high IQ either, just observation and testing. Depending on which language it also doesn’t require a high IQ.

      Since self-discipline predicts GPA where did you get the idea that high IQ is the engine that creates what contributions can deliver?

      High IQ has to do with IQ-style questions and is usually linked to learning ability and learning speed. If we understood IQ to be “learning speed” it would easily explain why so many people with super-high IQs (above 200) go on to contribute nothing significant.

      Atheists have ruined science and society by de-valuing contributions.

      In modern times someone who makes revolutionary contributions but is not a prodigy or high IQ genius will be ignored and viewed as nothing.
      People who contribute nothing significant but are high IQ prodigies will be celebrated as great geniuses.

      Just look at Kim Ung-yong, he is celebrated as a great genius because he is a high IQ prodigy, but he hasn’t contributed anything significant.
      Then look at Mikhail Leonidovich Gromov, he has made many revolutionary contributions to geometry, but who’s ever heard of Mikhail Gromov?

      This is all directly caused by the atheist population. Prior to atheists taking over IQ testing existed but no one really cared about IQ, what people use to care about was contributions, but not anymore.

      #3 – How did you equate close-ended inquiry to belief without evidence, intuition, and originality? Would you have discouraged Einstein from inventing his General Relativity idea?

      The history of science and mathematics clearly shows us that belief without evidence, intuition, and originality causes science to grow and advance. If someone only has beliefs with evidence then all they can really do is copy.

      #2 – You didn’t answer the question, it’s quite obvious that you understand nothing about science. You, like other atheists probably think science is about mimicking and copying scientific facts, lol.

      Science is not based on “fundamental laws of the universe” fool, science is based off the scientific method and empirical testing. Through observation and empirical testing scientists formulate supposed “laws”.

      Theology is what directly caused science to exist, as historians know.

      #1 – lol an atheist who doesn’t hate people because of their race and or religion? April Fools! Must be a non-white atheist then.

      Since you are an atheist, I don’t even consider you as a human being, but instead as a subhuman being. Even dogs, cats, and cockroaches are viewed by me as a step above an atheist. You’ll never find anyone as racist as an atheist.

      The only way I can consider atheists as human beings is if they give up their racism.

      I really wish atheists weren’t racist, but I know these atheist people, so I know how racist they are.

      • An average person / May 30 2012 12:04 pm

        why are you so judgemental?

  25. Avadhoot Velankar / Feb 15 2012 6:22 am

    I would have liked to answer your questions if you would have asked them to know their answers. But it more looks like you don’t want to know truth but just want to push your point forward that atheists are immoral and UN scientific which is not true.

  26. Agda / Feb 13 2012 8:30 pm

    Hitler was a christian…

    • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 1:20 am

      I know this is off-topic but I’ll respond anyway…

      How is Hitler being a Christian relevant? During Hitler’s time the majority of Germans were religious Christians and even during that time many Nazi officials were anti-christian or non-Christian like Martin Bormann (who was nearly equivalent to Hitler in power).

      “National Socialism and Christianity and irreconcilable” – Martin Bormann, Nazi leader

      Historians all know that many Nazi officials were non-Christian or anti-Christian even during Hitler’s time when Germany was a religious Christian country.

      Just look at modern times.

      Atheists have intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism. They voice opposition to many things, but not towards racism.

      The US has a 0.7% atheist population yet the founder of the US-based Neo-Nazi group White Aryan Resistance, Tom Metzger is an atheist.

      Richard Lynn, the liberal atheist who claims that liberal atheists have higher IQs (http://freethinker.co.uk/features/atheists-are-more-intelligent-than-religious-people/) is also the same person who authored the book “Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis”

      See liberal atheist Richard Lynn’s argument “The Dysgenic Effects Of Non White Immigration” – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26bQ7CWFe0c

      James D. Watson, the most celebrated liberal atheist biologist of all time is still celebrated by liberal atheists even after making racist remarks…why? Because atheists agree with and support his statements or don’t disagree enough to stop celebrating him.

      “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa because all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really” – Liberal atheist biologist, James D. Watson

      Anyone who knows a white atheist knows how racist they are. Just imagine what would happen if they took over a whole country. I guess that explains why 100% of atheist countries are extremely racist.

      You can talk to many of your Swedish friends on Stormfront, the White Nationalist forum. Since Sweden’s population size is less than 9.5 million why are so many Stormfront White Nationalist users from Sweden?

      I wonder which region in the US with a population size close to Sweden’s has as many Stormfront White Nationalist users as Sweden does…probably some liberal atheist region in New England.

      By the year 2030 once atheists really take over most of the world should be nationalistic. The world will accept liberal atheist Richard Lynn’s book as fact, not mere speculation specifically because of their belief in evolution and that the brain is the mind.

      There’s causation, not mere correlation. The belief in evolution and that the brain is the mind directly causes you to become racist.

      I’m sure lots of Nazis/atheists are rejoicing at the progress made in atheist countries.

      • An average person / May 30 2012 12:06 pm

        you cold have just said, “actually, he was in faact jewish.”……..

      • Anothersubhumanatheist / Aug 3 2014 4:33 pm

        Hitler may have been an atheist or at least a weak Christian, however he used antisemetic sentiment that had its basis in Medieval Christian sentiment. During the Bubonic Plague Jews were persecuted because they stayed healthy due to stricter dietary laws. This was done by Christians. By the way I don’t agree with the views of those racist atheists, the claims they make are disgusting. However you call atheists subhuman and treat them all as a lower class of beings, which is an unfair assesment of an entire group of people. You seem to have taken a minority of atheists and judged them to represent all of us. Should we judge you by the fact that the KKK was a Christian group? No, because the majority of Christians are better, kinder people than most. P.S. I wouldn’t defend Euler as a theologian, since one (dubiously canonical, albeit) argument of his includes shouting non sequiturs at Diderot.
        Hope I changed your mind!

    • Yves / Apr 7 2013 7:31 pm

      According to DNA results ( just Google it), Hitler had Jewish backgrounds. Plus , he hated Christians , never married at church , had sex with his niece ( like atheists ) and exterminated Christian handicapped -against the will of their Catholic or Protestant parents- in the very atheistic fashion of social-darwinism.

      • DVD Bach / Apr 7 2013 9:30 pm

        Yeah, atheists don’t do that. I won’t claim that Hitler’s a Christian, but he was definitely religious. You have to be to believe that your master race is divinely ordained.

        By the way, you look like an idiot making random, completely unfounded arguments about atheists. If you don’t have a source for things your incest accusation, your claims are rectally-derived, and we all know it.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 8:54 am

        @ DVD Bach :

        First, there is no master race in the Bible.
        Second, I have non-White backgrounds.
        Finally, all atheist I know like the master race you are talking about.

      • DVD Bach / Apr 8 2013 12:38 pm

        First, who cares? There are religions other than yours, too.
        Second, who cares? Did I say you didn’t?
        Finally, who cares? I don’t believe for a second that you’ve ever met a single atheist.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 1:50 pm

        First I care. He just was not religious at all, he was atheist like you.
        Second , so you don’t read what you wrote.
        Finally, I’m French. Google “France and anticléricalisme” then you will see that the country I live in has the largest number of atheists in the Western countries since a very long time. But I’m quite sure you know nothing about history. The word “communisme” comes from France ( la révolte des Communes ) and the word “athéisme” was first used in France in the context of Christianity. The first Concordat was signed in France, then by Mussolini and Hitler , more than a century later.
        Concordat is a treaty to diminish the influence of churches and faith.

      • DVD Bach / Apr 8 2013 6:32 pm

        First, you don’t agree that Hitler believed his master race was divinely ordained?
        Second, show me where I claimed you weren’t white.
        Third, again I say: who cares? You clearly don’t know the first thing about atheists, if you make such absurd claims as the one you did about incest.

      • Yves / Apr 9 2013 1:24 am

         
        First, you don’t agree that Hitler believed his master race was divinely ordained?
         
        Hitler thought that science have proved that Whites are at the top of Evolution. This is an atheistic race classification based on social-Darwinism which inspired many countries.  
        This teaching officially existed in anticlerical France long before the nazis took power. Hitler was even not born at this time.  
        He also exterminated handicapped and made demonic experiments…still based on scientific preoccupations.  
        Such experiments were made before ( in smaller scale ) in other countries for the same scientific purpose.  
        Nothing to see with any divine order. 
         
        Second, show me where I claimed you weren’t white.
         
         
        You have to be to believe that
        YOUR  master race is divinely ordained.  
         
        Your phrase is equivocal , but I admit it can be understood differently.
         
         
        Third, again I say: who cares? You clearly don’t know the first thing about atheists, if you make such absurd claims as the one you did about incest.
         
        You first declared  I don’t believe for a second that you’ve ever met a single atheist . During years I’ve almost never met a Christian at school because I went in a public school which were very anticlerical in France. Christians were bullied , and I was bullied for my ethnicity too. 
        I can easily say that I probably met more atheists than you. I know their thesis , their projects and their deeds. 

  27. Chris P / Feb 9 2012 12:27 am

    You still haven’t answered the question as to whether you have stopped beating your wife.

  28. Anonymous / Feb 7 2012 4:36 pm

    This guy HAS to be a troll.

  29. Matthew / Feb 7 2012 1:21 pm

    I’ll give you my most honest answers.

    #10 – Do you take pleasure in telling lies or are you just so gullible that you believe any anti-religious lie you hear?

    No, I do not lie. I am not gullible. The question (and questioner) is stupid.

    #9 – Are you only capable of mimicking and copying arguments you heard from Dawkins and other atheists?

    No, whilst many, if not most arguments of Dawkins are excellent, I am a rational, capable thinker in my own right.

    #8 – What’s the reason that you continue to use racist atheists as viable sources, celebrate racist atheist biologists and racist/atheist countries?

    Like most atheists I am not a racist. The whole premise of the question seems to be from a fantasy world.

    #7 – Do you have any independent mind of your own or ability to question what other atheists say or think?

    Yes on the independent mind. So yes I have the ability to question what other people say whether they are atheists or not.

    #6 – Why do you consider any criticism of atheists, atheistic arguments, or atheistic beliefs as “trolling” but not consider condemning, ridiculing, or making fun of religion as “trolling”?
    I don’t particularly you can call anything trolling, except on a case by case basis. Perhaps that you do shows some unbalance of mind.

    #5 – Why have you intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism but not silent in opposition to Intelligent Design, Creationism, and many other things?
    I’m not silent on racists. Intelligent Design and Creationism are rubbish theories and are wrong, and should be opposed on the basis of a little thing called truth.

    #4 – Why do you value high IQ as being worth more than contributions?
    Huh? This is a really general question. I’d need context, and then you’re supposing I’d view different behaviours in a specified ladder of worth. I think therefore your question is rather unanswerable.

    #3 – Why do you discourage belief without evidence, intuition, and originality?
    Belief is the absence of evidence. Intuition and originality aren’t worh hanything if they go against evidence.

    #2 – Why are you an anti-science fanatic who strongly opposes free and open criticism, scrutiny, and questioning?
    I’m no anti-science at all.

    #1 – Who do you hate more, Jews or Muslims?
    It depends on whether they are religious fundamentalists or smokers, more on which camp they belong to.

    Now they were my honest answers. I do believe that you should give up the blogging. You are making one helluva fool of yourself. You claim to be a genius, and I’m afraid you come off as a hateful, infantile, small-minded bigot.

    Concentrate on your studies buddy. I think you’re not going to have enough time to write a hateful blog and study (and you ain’t no genius).

    And the number one lesson for you now is to learn the meaning of the word humility. Give up the blogging please, not for us, but for you.

  30. fionn maccumhail / Feb 7 2012 1:06 am

    Basically, this fool is asking just how much like him we are.

  31. TheDancingGeek / Feb 6 2012 9:41 pm

    Excuse me, the person actually has to have done what you’re asking for you to ask them why they did it. Otherwise you’re accusing them of doing something that, especially in your case, is plain wrong. It’s called a loaded question.

    “Why are you so arrogant?”
    “Why do you accuse atheists of being full of hate while you are extremely hateful towards them?” “Why do you accuse atheists of telling lies and using logical fallacies when you yourself use loaded questions, ad hominems, and other fallacies to defend your point?”

    These are loaded questions. If I asked you one of these, you would be trapped, because there is no way for you to answer the question without admitting that you did what the question is asking you about. Even if you aren’t arrogant (which is debatable…), if I ask you why you are arrogant, then you are forced to say that you are arrogant to answer the question. That isn’t fair! If you use that in an argument, you put words in your opponent’s mouths that they didn’t say.

    And loaded questions don’t just make for an unfair argument, they are very sloppy. You’re using a FALLACY. If you bring that into any academic circle, you would get laughed out of town. No one would argue with you if you use fallacies to prove all your points! Which, so far, you are doing! So please, I beg you, start using real arguments. Take a class on logic, or visit a freaking high school debate club.

  32. Pauly / Feb 6 2012 3:19 pm

    they are not questions they are insults from some fool thats been sucked in by religion

  33. Zak / Feb 6 2012 11:45 am

    They may end in a question mark, but those are not honest questions.

  34. norm / Feb 6 2012 3:27 am

    whats so lame about this list is that it would be equally cretinous and irrelevant if the word ‘atheist’ was replaced by ‘Christian’ throughout it.

    get a life, seriously.
    you do a major disservice to your belief system by voicing such idiotic hate-spew.

  35. Fabio García / Feb 6 2012 2:37 am

    Ten leading questions, one after the other. For someone who claims superior knowledge of logic and argumentation, you’re not too shy about using fallacies yourself.

    • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 1:25 am

      Except that since these questions aren’t used as arguments no logical fallacy can occur.

      • concernedperson@fuckadog.com / Feb 16 2012 3:11 am

        Bullshit Mr Itsnobody. Your questions are shit..

      • Fabio García / Feb 16 2012 10:20 am

        It’s still an informal fallacy. Ten informal fallacies, actually.

      • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 10:40 am

        Fallacies can only occur if something is used as an argument fool. So no fallacy ever occurs here because none of these questions are used as arguments.

        I think atheists should try much harder.

        I guess atheists are no challenge for me, they are just too stupid and idiotic, truthfully the dumbest forms of life.

      • Fabio García / Feb 16 2012 10:02 pm

        I hope you’re not claiming that your questions aren’t already an attempted argument against atheism, loaded as they are.

  36. gilbertrsmith / Feb 6 2012 1:30 am

    Here are some questions for YOU!

    1. Do your parents know you’re a gay retarded person?

    2. Do you spread lies for fun or because you’re retarded?

    3. What does your dad’s cock taste like?

    CHECK AND MATE.

    • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 12:13 am

      Changing the subject to asking me questions instead? If you have questions for me then go ahead and post it on your blog or site or something.

      • concernedperson@fuckadog.com / Feb 16 2012 3:13 am

        1. Yes, they do, but because they gave me my religious genes they say aborting a 23 year old foetus is wrong.

        2. It’s because I’m retarded

        3. Just like my mama’s cock.

      • fail detector / May 30 2012 12:20 pm

        heh, itsnobody, ya JUST GOT PWNED!!!!!!!!1

    • Yves / Apr 7 2013 7:23 pm

      @ Gilbert Smith


      It is well-known that incest is in the atheist agenda. You have prove it !

  37. gilbertrsmith / Feb 6 2012 1:29 am

    THOSE AREN’T QUESTIONS YOU STUPID SACK OF SHIT, THEY’RE ACCUSATIONS.

    How dare you call yourself an intellectual? You can barely shit your pants without having a fucking brain aneurysm.

    • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 12:16 am

      So they are still questions, even if they are loaded questions, most of the assumptions are probably true.

      I know your atheist kind and I know how racist they are. They are the worst people you will ever encounter.

      • Fabio García / Feb 16 2012 11:36 am

        That’s called a perception bias.

  38. Andrew / Feb 6 2012 12:45 am

    Not only do you fail at trolling, you fail at Christianity.

  39. Brendo / Feb 5 2012 11:55 pm

    Clever Poe dude. You’ve ruffled some feathers.

  40. Dave Littler / Feb 5 2012 11:06 pm

    10) That’s a little like asking “Do you like eating pies, or do you like running fast?” The two don’t seem to be in opposition to one another or even directly related. I mean, could a person not enjoy telling lies AND be gullible? Your thoughts seem a little unfocused here.

    9) No, I’m also capable of eating pies and running fast! Also, probably some other activities that are slipping my mind right now.

    8) That’s a little like asking someone “Why is it that when a wife-beater tells you that ten plus ten equals twenty, you don’t tell him that his math is wrong?” Does the fact that a person has a flaw in one area necessarily mean they’re wrong in others?

    7) Yes! Thanks for asking. :)

    6) I don’t. I suspect that you are personally confronted with the claim that opposition to atheism is “trolling” enough that you believe that any such opposition must be trolling simply because the form of opposition which you practice in is so uniformly unpleasant, antagonistic and condescending that it APPEARS to be trolling, and so you’re accused of it a great deal. I don’t believe that your opposition to atheism is trolling, however. I think that you’re just blind to the extent that your antagonism alienates those who you wish to persuade and that your anger and disgust towards those whose views conflict with yours on the topic makes it difficult for you to talk about it in a way which is essentially indistinguishable from trolling.

    5) “Why do you intentionally remain silent in opposition to the eating of pie but not silent in opposition to running fast?” Again, these seem like unrelated topics.

    4) I don’t! I love contributions! As long as they’re not contributions to, you know… horrible things. In that case I guess I value IQ more?

    3) I discourage belief without evidence because to do otherwise is to tacitly encourage belief without evidence. I don’t discourage belief without intuition or without originality, though, so I’m not sure what you’re getting at with that.

    2) Okay, remember what I was saying about #6 on your list? This is pretty much exactly what I was talking about.

    1) It really depends upon which of them are more horrible people. It’s a case-by-case thing.

  41. Mike / Feb 5 2012 10:21 pm

    #10 (false dichotomy – being on a higher plane you already knew that but some of your lower plane readers may have missed it). No and no.
    #9 No
    #8 (another logical fallacy, but we know you already knew that). An argument is either valid or not, the source should not be relevant.
    #7 Yes and yes
    #6 (another logical fallacy) I don’t
    #5 (another logical fallacy) There are many things I am not silent about.
    #4 (another logical fallacy) I don’t
    #3 (another logical fallacy) I don’t
    #2 (another logical fallacy) I’m not
    #1 (another false dichotomy) Niether. I don’t hate names.

    There is a pattern here and perhaps if I was also on the higher plane I would better understand why the questions involve so many violations of logic.

    • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 12:17 am

      Actually, these questions aren’t used as arguments or to show or refute anything so no logical fallacy occurs…

  42. John / Feb 5 2012 10:04 pm

    #10 – Do you take pleasure in telling lies or are you just so gullible that you believe any anti-religious lie you hear?

    No

    #9 – Are you only capable of mimicking and copying arguments you heard from Dawkins and other atheists?

    No

    #8 – What’s the reason that you continue to use racist atheists as viable sources, celebrate racist atheist biologists and racist/atheist countries?

    N/A. I don’t.

    #7 – Do you have any independent mind of your own or ability to question what other atheists say or think?

    Yes

    #6 – Why do you consider any criticism of atheists, atheistic arguments, or atheistic beliefs as “trolling” but not consider condemning, ridiculing, or making fun of religion as “trolling”?

    N/A. I don’t.

    #5 – Why have you intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism but not silent in opposition to Intelligent Design, Creationism, and many other things?

    N/A. I haven’t.

    #4 – Why do you value high IQ as being worth more than contributions?

    N/A. I don’t.

    #3 – Why do you discourage belief without evidence, intuition, and originality?

    N/A. I don’t. (well, not without evidence anyway.)

    #2 – Why are you an anti-science fanatic who strongly opposes free and open criticism, scrutiny, and questioning?

    N/A. I’m not.

    #1 – Who do you hate more, Jews or Muslims?

    N/A. I don’t hate either.

    The three yes/no questions were okay, but the rest were crap. You should know, logical genius that you claim to be, that you need to establish that a condition actually exists before demanding an explanation for it. Why did you murder your wife and kids?

  43. Chris P / Feb 5 2012 8:52 pm

    Strange then that are more Christians in jail as a percentage than atheists. The right believe in carrying guns – presumably to kill or destroy their crazy god’s creations. They love killing small animals for fun.

    I came to my own conclusions about atheism thanks – reading Dawkins book just confirmed them.

    Actually – what I hate most is religious interference in government when the religious cannot agree about almost anything.

    • itsnobody / Feb 16 2012 12:28 am

      lol thanks for the mimicked and copied/atheistic response.

      Switzerland has a much lower murder rate than Sweden and one of the highest gun ownership rates in the entire world.

      Of course there are more Christians in jail, only 0.7% of the US is atheist according to the ARIS report.

      Also correlation is not causation so those atheists are probably not committing crime despite being atheists, not because they are atheists.

    • Yves / Apr 7 2013 7:09 pm

      When an atheist is in jail , he suddenly declares he is now a Christian. Atheists are cowards.
      It is well-known that there is no atheist in foxholes.

      • DVD Bach / Apr 7 2013 7:16 pm

        Why would an atheist do that? Show me a shred of evidence supporting that claim.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 8 2013 4:01 am

        Most people, especially from my country, would consider it highly ironic that a French person has the audacity to lecture on cowardice… but pointless xenophobia aside, look up Pat Tillman – an atheist killed by friendly fire in the Middle East – so you do actually find atheists in the military.

        But it would make sense for their to be fewer atheists – when you understand that once you die that’s it, game over, life becomes a lot more precious – both yours and everyone else’s. Without a belief in the magical sky-father and his magical lovely kingdom in the clouds of happily ever-after, taking a life seems so drastic as to require a very serious reason. We haven’t had a noble war since WWII, so why would someone who understands that this life is all there is join the military to fight and die in a pointless war?

        As for atheists finding God in jail – there’s no evidence of this. What you do find is a massively disproportionate amount of offenders are religious, and prison often has the effect of increasing this belief. Again, this makes perfect sense – if you can still live happily every after in God’s magical sky garden so long as you repent, why not break the rules in this life?

        As a religious person, what you have to do is remember that reality is generally the complete opposite of what you’re taught is true. Religion doesn’t make people more moral, more brave, better, more generous, more charitable. These are all fabrications not supported by reality.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 9:11 am

        @ sugarcanegray : 
          
        Poor guy, you seem so stupid !  
        You don’t even know the deep sense of english popular expressions.   
        No atheists in the foxholes only means that in sudden great danger many atheists suddenly become more religious.  
        You probably too ignorant to know that famous atheist figures at the point of agony have recognised this fact.  
        Stalin himself suddenly freed orthodox clerics when his friend Hitler decided to invade Russia. Afterward , Stalin asked them to bless Moscow. Then soviet troops were allowed to pray during battles against the nazis , which many did. This is an historic fact …
         

        President Dwight D. Eisenhower declared in remarks broadcast from the White House as part of a February 7, 1954 American Legion Program:  
           
        “ As a former soldier, I am delighted that our veterans are sponsoring a movement to increase our awareness of God in our daily lives. In battle, they learned a great truth-that there are no atheists in the foxholes. They know that in time of test and trial, we instinctively turn to God for new courage…Whatever our individual church, whatever our personal creed, our common faith in God is a common bond among us.”
         
         
         

         
        @  sugarcanegray & DVD Bach :
          
         
        As for atheists finding God in jail – there’s no evidence of this.
         

        Let’s see ! Have you heard about Marc and Michelle Dutroux ? They are cruel pedophiles who abducted , raped and killed young girls in Belgium during the 90′. 
        Nowadays, Michelle Dutroux pretends to have found faith in prison ( perhaps  in order to be freed before her completion of term ? ) ; she now lives somewhere in France, in a monastery . Don’t you deduce she was an atheist at the time she helped a husband to rape underage girls ? Do you think it is the only case ?
        In France there are more atheists (charged with murder or rape) in jail than Christians according to priests and nuns dedicated to inmate religious service. And they are very quick to flip-flop ! That makes mechanically a new turn in the statistic… 
         In France, police tend to make homeless refugees (Muslims most of the time) in jail during weeks which increase the statistic of believers in prison, but hard-core criminal such Dutroux are mainly atheists.  
        If this Dutroux was known to be a bit religious, no doubt that all atheist websites would have labelled him has a devoted Christian… But they could not !
         

         
         Do you really think I care about the one example of an atheist killed in Afghanistan in the UK army ? Is it relevant ? Perhaps for such a xenophobic person like you…
        But as I meant to say, I don’t argue about the fact that 1 or 2 atheists can fight in the army, I mean to explain that people who spend much of the time drinking , using drugs , watching porns and playing video games are more inclined to atheism then people who face serious situations.  
         

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 8 2013 9:24 am

        Oh dear Yves, clearly you didn’t read or understand what I was getting at. The point is, you do find atheists in the foxholes, because atheists like myself would never turn to god, even in the most difficult of circumstances (such as war) BECAUSE WE KNOW WITH 99.9% CERTAINTY HE DOES NOT EXIST.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 8 2013 9:32 am

        Oh dear Yves, clearly you didn’t read or understand what I was getting at. The point is, you do find atheists in the foxholes, because atheists like myself would never turn to god, even in the most difficult of circumstances (such as war) BECAUSE WE KNOW WITH 99.9% CERTAINTY HE DOES NOT EXIST. Sure, some people might throw out prayers in the midst of battle, but then a lot of people curse and swear under pressure who normally don’t. That doesn’t really mean very much, except to people like yourself who consider a prayer to be an admission of a conversion to your fairy story.

        I might, if I end up in a trench one day, pray to the flying spaghetti monster as that would be just as effective as praying to that fucking fictional cunt Yahweh.

        Furthermore, you are as guilty as the muppet itsnobody when you claim atheists are cowards – it’s as equally stupid as the stereotype that all French people are cowards (which is a much more prominent stereotype, I must point out) and it was this point I was refuting. It’s as bad as claiming all atheists are racist – it bears little or no relation to reality.

        Finally, as for people who spend time drinking, doing drugs, watching porn etc are inclined to atheism – what’s your evidence for this? There is no evidence for this – you’re simply making up things that you think are correct, but in reality aren’t.

        Take a look at the US and their penal system – religious people offend more. More religious states have higher murder rates, more racism, more crime, more teen pregnancy, more drug problems etc etc. Look at the most religious countries in the world and you do not see healthy societies – you see societies torn, corrupt, morally dangerous with serious social issues.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 8 2013 9:36 am

        You’d also do well to look up Pat Tillman – he was a US atheist killed in combat, which is a great counter-example to the foxholes phrase.

        Also this: Joe Simpson, author of Touching the Void, addresses the issue in the film adaptation of his nearly fatal climb up the Siula Grande mountain. Referring to the moment when he lay at the bottom of a deep crevasse, dehydrated, alone, and with a broken leg, he states: ‘”I was totally convinced I was on my own, that no one was coming to get me. I was brought up as a devout Catholic. I’d long since stopped believing in God. I always wondered if things really hit the fan, whether I would, under pressure, turn round and say a few Hail Marys and say ‘Get me out of here’. It never once occurred to me. It meant that I really don’t believe and I really do think that when you die, you die, that’s it, there’s no afterlife.”

        So just a couple of notable examples to counter the phrase, which is an annoying aphorism and not, as you perceive it to be, truth.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 11:12 am

        @ sugarcanegray :
         
        I might, if I end up in a trench one day, pray to the flying spaghetti monster…

         
        You took the words out of my mouth : you are a full-fledged idiot !
        I guess you often end up in a ditch because you seem to use narcotics a lot.
         
        So we know with 99% certainty HE does not exist
        You are a statistic expert then…but :  

        ‘I can’t be sure God DOES NOT exist’. 

         

        World’s most notorious atheist Richard Dawkins admits he is in fact agnostic.
         
         
        Ah ! Ah ! Ah ! 
        Oh atheists ! You are so nuts !
         
         
        Even your mentor disagree with you…
         
        Your statistics suck then. What about the murder rates you used ? Bullshit as usual ?  
        Perhaps you used the North Korean ones, where atheists put believers in concentration camps.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 8 2013 11:26 am

        Oh for fuck’s sake you really are pathetic. Agnostic and atheist are essentially the same thing – ask any atheist like myself and they have to admit the VERY outside possibility of your particular madness being true. We are also aware of the fallibility of humans and our perception, so we do have to give your God a fraction of a percent’s chance of existing. However, can you, as a religious nut, accept the possibility that you’re wrong and there is no God? I doubt it – I’ve never heard a religious person concede the same.

        So yeah, I agree with Dawkins. Dawkins agrees that the two essentially mean the same thing. You guys love to cherry pick because you haven’t mentioned that Dawkins sees no difference between agnostic or atheist – both lack a faith in the sky-father and both concede the outside possibility that we’re wrong about that.

        Pathetic how you like to try and jump on that kind of thing – the same tired, old religious stuff like “oh but Darwin said this” or “so and so said that” – it does nothing to bolster your argument, only highlight the utter fragility of your view point.

        We can cherry pick too:

        “there is no God”

        Psalm 14:1

        See, even your precious Bible admits it.

        But hopefully that just pointed out how childish and stupid your quote mining, your “this person said this” and “this person said that” stuff is – its the sign of a weak argument with nothing to back it up.

        As for the crime stats, this easy-to-digest graph shows what I mean:

        http://sciencenotes.wordpress.com/2012/02/26/religion-and-crime/

        more religious, more social problems, it’s that quantifiably simple.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 12:26 pm

        @ sugarmoron :

        You chart is partisan , made by atheists for impressing the only one atheist who was interested by it. Actually, it just reflects the level of poverty largely due to the legacy of slavery. So I was right, it is a North Korean method you have used to back your will to sneakily express your hate of black folks because you know that this chart is about the localisation of Blacks in America.

        Liar, liar, your pants are on fire !
        Plus, atheism is not agnosticism. You are too stupid to make the difference.
        I guess you don’t know what is etymology since you are incapable of reading correctly 
        Psalm 14:1 which says :
         
         
        « The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. »
         

        You are a real atheist : immoral !
         
        No need to answer me, I don’t spend time with liars.

      • Anonymous / May 1 2013 2:32 am

        Sugarcanegray , you like calling names don’t you ? So tell us what is you favourite racial slurs against the Irish. U so tacky I’m quite sure u wear mandals with socks. 

      • sugarcanegray / May 1 2013 4:05 am

        the Irish aren’t a race. And I’m not quite sure what “mandals” are.

      • Anonymous / May 2 2013 12:24 pm

        Golly,u the only hooligan who knows it.

      • Yves / May 3 2013 12:50 am

        Most people would consider it highly ironic that hooligans have the audacity to lecture on bigotry. 
         
         

      • Anonymous / May 5 2013 12:58 pm

        most people would indeed consider it highly ironic that hooligans have the audacity to lecture on rate crime.

    • sugarcanegray / Apr 8 2013 12:39 pm

      Yves, debating with you is like debating with a child – you don’t answer, you don’t directly respond to any points, you just dance around flailing your arms going “weeeeeeeee”. It’s pathetic.

      The chart is the result of a scientific approach, which is not partisan – it’s the most objective method we have for describing and understand the natural world. Of course you will disagree with it, because your world view is blinkered by your dogma. But that doesn’t change the reality. The same can be applied to nations as a whole – the most self-destructive nations on the planet are those with the most religion – think of Ethiopia and the Middle East as great examples.

      Of course, as we all know (although judging by the idiocy you’ve shown so far, this is going to be a new concept for you) correlation doesn’t equal causation. So does religion cause these problems? Doubtful. But what it does show is WHY people choose this delusion – the more fragile someone’s surroundings, the more precarious their standing, the poorer their education, the more likely they are to believe in the magical sky-father.

      So whilst this does not show religion as being a causal factor, it does show that religion does not provide the morals people think it does, it’s merely a reaction to a very unstable and dangerous world. And it doesn’t make things any better, only contribute to them getting worse.

      And no, this has nothing to do with my “hate of black folks” I do not hate anyone based on the colour of their skin – this is a false accusation that you have no proof for, no justification for, and to be honest it just makes you look like a little child throwing a tantrum.

      I know there is a dictionary definition difference between agnostic and atheist, fuck you just don’t read anything I say, do you?

      And my word you really are daft if you couldn’t understand what I did by quoting Psalm 14:1 – the point was to highlight how stupid your cherry picking of Dawkins quotes was. I cherry picked the words “there is no God” to show how quoting incomplete information is totally stupid.

      All you’ve done in this debate is show everyone that your delusion keeps your arguments at the level of a child.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 2:24 pm

        I’ve seen the exact same chart before with different analysis and comments. This chart was then edited by a nazi website. Instead of religion, they underlined the repartition of Blacks. You are all the same.

        I remember that on another topic you did say that China is not an atheist country and England has no state religion. You are such an ignorant.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 2:35 pm

        Plus, an English friend of mine read your comments about ” England is a secular country” ; he hardly believed you are English then finally concluded that you are a probably a depraved drop-out.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 8 2013 3:19 pm

        “you are all the same”
        In what possible way am I like a Nazi? Bloody hell that is the most pathetic attempt at a counter argument I’ve ever heard. As I’ve said, I am not, in any way racist. As for the chart being used by Nazis, well, that’s a typical attempt at a vested interest to pervert science – go to any Christian science website and you’ll see them pulling the same shit. But what that does not refute is that religion makes people better than atheists – if that were true, the chart would be reversed. But it’s not. Reality strikes again – and it never favours religion.

        “you are ignorant”
        China wasn’t an atheist country until Mao, which is what we were arguing at that point. Which is wasn’t. They’re not christian, that;s for sure, but they have supernatural beliefs. Officially, they are atheist. Realistically, their culture is full of superstition, mythology and supernatural beings.

        You are such a piss-poor debater I’m wondering if you had any kind of education at all. I hope it’s a language barrier thing and not that you’re simply thick as pig shit.

        As for the UK not being secular – you friend seriously needs to open their eyes. For all intents and purposes, and to every Brit I know (I guarantee you I know more than you) we are secular. No religion in our lives is forced upon us, and I’m not alone in this opinion. We merely have lingering traditions that we are slowly changing. I explained this at the time but you’re clearly such a fucking numpty who can’t even stay ON FUCKING TOPIC I’m having to explain myself again. You barely addressed a single thing in my pervious post, because you cannot tackle anything, or even have a reasonable debate. Yves, you are pathetic. This is obvious because first and foremost you’re a coward who needs fairy stories of a magical sky father to keep you safe at night. Life is a wonderful fleeting glimpse at this amazing universe, and to waste it on fairy stories is pathetic, cowardly and just plain fucking stupid.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 3:56 pm

        I don’t care about YOUR definitions. China is an atheist country and Britain is not a secular country.
        PERIOD

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 4:15 pm

        No, I told u before, no need to explain again, you proved you are an ignorant. You even said that Europe is less racist than the USA , so I recalled you that the skinhead movement came from Britain, and soccer fans are chanting racist songs in the european stadium. I guess you will try to make believe that they have a high morality standard. Those racists imitating apes are not Christians !!! But you will keep saying that faith does not make people nicer…
        I used to live in Germany , and German know that the former atheist east Germany has a much higher murder rate than the Christian West Germany. And the nazis are numerous in the most atheist part of Germany. So, your phoney statistic…

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 8 2013 5:26 pm

        And again not dealing with a single thing I said.

        And an ignorant what? At least learn how to phrase things properly if you’re going to bother to learn a foreign language. You can call someone “ignorant” or “an ignorant person” but “an ignorant” in English is incomplete. Also, having refuted everything you’ve said, that is a very wayward statement – I’ve given plenty of ammo to bolster my views, you have given none. That makes you the more ignorant, especially as you are wilfully ignoring most of what I’m saying.

        I said China is an atheist country. Can’t you read?

        But I’ll play your stupid little game if you like. The skinhead movement did indeed come from the UK. I never said we have no racism here, far from it – I’m fully aware of the racial problems we have in Europe. We just haven’t had the problems of lynch mobs, fewer racial killings and that kind of thing. That is the justification for the statement that Europe can claim to be less racist, especially to those on of a different race living here.

        But, hang on, according to you, Britain is a religious society – so if we are religious, as you claim, and then going by your reasoning on the skinhead thing, we are racist, ergo – religion causes racism!

        You see, your arguments are all over the place, it’s impossible to keep track as you keep contradicting yourself.

        And stop mentioning the nazis for fuck’s sake – have you never heard of Godwin’s Law? Only those with no argument left fall back on the nazis, and both sides of an argument can use the nazis as an example which makes the a very bad arguing point.

        As for Germany – I’m afraid that does nothing to further your argument. Take a look at the graph I sent you again. This is a correlation that can be seen globally. There are outliers, sure, but we’re looking at overall patterns. and the pattern is VERY SIMPLE – so simple a child could understand: OVERALL, THE MORE RELIGIOUS A GIVEN SOCIETY, THE MORE DANGEROUS THAT SOCIETY IS.

        If you’d have bothered to read my comment above about correlation, you’ll understand that I do not see this as a 100% causal factor. Yet, you claim the opposite of reality to be a 100% causal factor – Oh they are atheist so thats why they kill more… yes, you need to learn a little about statistics and how to interpret them.

        So you can keep your chanting about faith making people better, but you’ve yet to provide any proof other than a couple of outliers.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 5:32 pm

        You are such a piss-poor debater I’m wondering if you had any kind of education at all. I hope it’s a language barrier thing and not that you’re simply thick as pig shit.

        Insults every 3 lines. Well-educated ? Yes, you are a true xenophobic nazi atheist. Only skinheads insulted me that way.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 8 2013 5:38 pm

        So far you have likened me to Nazis, Skinheads, you’ve called me an ignorant, a coward, you’ve called me stupid, xenophobic and I’m sure a few more insults too – and you’re criticising me for insulting you?!! Are you fo real? Dish it out but can’t take it? Typical I guess. At least my insults to you have some grounding in reality – you are a pisspoor debater (please reference Godwin’s Law – this is the epitome of bad debating) your diction is poor and you have misunderstood the most basic of concepts (stupid/poor education)

        Yet, you cannot show I’m a nazi, nor that I’m a racist (my Indian ex-wife would love to know how you find me racist) and nor that I’m xenophobic.

        Utterly pathetic.

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 5:46 pm

        You mocked my English, you spat on Frenchmen and Americans ( on another topic ) (as though your English also look sometimes a foreign language -as you knowledge of English culture – , said my English friend) …you are a crypto-nazi.
        Your arguments are only based on ” fuck…fuck…bloody…fuck”.
        I’m quite sure you only know two words in French or other foreign language. You can’t spend your time watching porns and learn history, French and literature .

        Fuck…fuck…fuck

      • Yves / Apr 8 2013 5:54 pm

        my Indian ex-wife
        Why did she quit ? Because you are vulgar or because she hated when you mocked her accent ? Or perhaps because as many atheists I met you think that Whites can rape non-White girls.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 9 2013 4:04 am

        Yes we’ve established that we’ve insulted each other – so what? You can’t insult someone and then throw a hissy fit when they insult you back, and seeing how the premise of this entire blog, which you wholeheartedly support, is a massive unfounded, insulting and bigoted attack on a large group of people, you really have no grounds to complain at all. Stop throwing your toys out of the pram and acting like a baby. “boo hoo he insulted me, waaaaaaah” is all we’re reading from you now. Pathetic.

        And what the fuck are you going on about? I have never met a white person who claims that white men can rape non-white women. What the fuck are you talking about? Where did you get that from? A nazi website? And my ex-wife and are damn good friends and I never once mocked her accent, or in fact acted in any way racist towards her. Your god must be so proud of how you love to attack people with no evidence and no reason – but then again, your entire deluded world view is based on no evidence and no reason so I shouldn’t be surprised at all. Fucking pathetic. Just like your god.

        As for me swearing, it’s difficult not to when you’re debating against someone who consistently contradicts themselves, uses only anecdotal evidence and poor reasoning, refuses to deal with anything other than petty unfounded attacks and continues to ignore the evidence put forth.

        So let’s sum this up.

        1) You have no evidence to support the hypothesis that atheists are racist.
        2) You have no evidence to support your god-based worldview
        3) You have consistently contradicted yourself
        4) The evidence you have put forward is easily refuted and can be used to argue the point in either direction (for example: the UK is secular and racist, the UK is not secular and racist)
        5) You have shown yourself to be a rather petty individual, going beyond insults to personal digs at my relationship with my ex-wife
        6) You have continually ignored everything that’s put in front of you.
        7) You have continually turned to the nazis to bolster an argument (please look into Godwin’s Law to see why that is a feeble debating tactic

        There’s little point you responding unless you want to continue to show everyone what a petty and spiteful person you truly are.

      • Yves / Apr 9 2013 4:29 am

        I once told you that I pardon your french…if you pardon my english.
        It really seems that you don’t understand popular english expressions ; you only a profanity expert : an atheist.
        I don’t care what you think about me. I wrote comments as I have witnessed that atheists are racist people in the anticlerical public schools I attended when I was younger.
        If you want to fuck…fuck…fuck… everything I said, just do it !
        Pardon my englis, at least I know that England has a state religion…

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 9 2013 4:53 am

        Wow we keep going around in circles. I’ve explained to you that I’m fully aware we have a state religion (Church of England, which was my official religion until I shook free of the shackles of delusion) but as I explained, bar the traditional aspect, they have no say, no power, no influence. This is like banging my head against a brick wall, having to repeat myself because clearly you can’t get your small little mind around such a basic concept. You’ve got nothing really, except going over the same nonsense over and over again. Pretty boring, like a Church service.

        The French have a couple of names for us that tickle me – Les Rosbifs and Les Fuckoffs. Swearing, profanity, is commonplace in the UK, just like Roast Beef. There’s little point badgering on about it as it does nothing to further the debate, only distract it – which is obviously your goal as you basically have a flaky hypothesis built on misinformation, bigotry and delusion.

      • Yves / Apr 9 2013 8:15 am

        @ sugarcane,

        What’s the point with “R***f” ? I have never say such idiocies once in my life. Though you are right : french atheists speak the same fluent french you speak here. French atheists used the xenophobic slurs you talk about.
        I’m pretty sure you were implicitly xenophobic with your ex-wife originally from India by mocking her english or her culture.

        You admit England has state religion as soon as I posted a list of secular countries which includes the USA (as soon means very lately) , as though you thought the USA are a theocracy. The link is still available.
        I guess the topic was Why atheists are so racist ? . I will check this later.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 9 2013 8:36 am

        “I’m pretty sure you were implicitly xenophobic with your ex-wife originally from India by mocking her english or her culture.”

        At what point did I mock my ex, show any signs of xenophobia towards her or her culture? Please, I’d love to know where you got that crap from.

        Like everything you’re writing – it’s nothing more than assumptions and delusions. You are a self-confessed bigot (by your attitude towards atheists) so calling me (unfoundedly) racist or xenophobic is very much a case of the pot calling the kettle black – VERY hypocritical.

        Don’t bother replying unless you can a) prove some kind of racism I have shown towards my ex-wife or b) you can actually come up with some proof for your insane claims.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 9 2013 8:41 am

        AND FOR ONE FINAL TIME I will explain the situation with the UK. Officially we have a state religion. In terms of law, order, social policy etc, they have no power or influence at all. To the vast majority of people in this country, we are secular – and becoming more so all the time – the Church of England is completely inconsequential. It’s like we are officially a monarchy – but we refer to ourselves as citizens these days and not subjects. The Queen has no say in the running of the country and has no effect on our every day lives. Even the government no longer refer to us as subjects of the Queen, but British or European citizens.

        Please stop bringing this up again – I have fully explained this situation.

      • Anonymous / Apr 20 2013 11:37 am

        @ sugarcanegray

        « Let me explain: atheism, as the word suggests, is merely the lack of theism. That’s it, nothing more, nothing less. It has nothing to do with race, gender, or any other classification. It’s the word “theism” with an “a” in front of it – in the same way asymmetry just means un-symmetrical, atheism just means un-theistic»
        also nazism only means nazional socialism .

      • Anonymous / Apr 24 2013 12:00 am

        A social worker (in Austria) told me the well-known fact that the prison Catholic churches are far to be overcrowded. Inmates are seemingly more football fans than occasional mass-goers. 
        Notice that the most sadistic austrian child abusers ( i.e. Wolfgang Priklopil) also weren’t reported to occasionally attend church.

      • Marshall Plan / May 5 2013 8:09 pm

        “I’m fully aware of the racial problems we have in Europe. We just haven’t had the problems of lynch mobs, fewer racial killings and that kind of thing. That is the justification for the statement that Europe can claim to be less racist, especially to those on of a different race living here.”

        Europe only had problems with two world wars, ethnic cleansing ( Germany, Serbia, Kosovo etc…), totalitarianism ; and finally needed the USA to restore peace, order and civilization. 
        Do you speak German ?

      • Marshall Plan / May 5 2013 8:40 pm

        “At least learn how to phrase things properly if you’re going to bother to learn a foreign language. You can call someone “ignorant” or “an ignorant person” but “an ignorant” in English is incomplete.”

        Very petty.
        Ungrateful and petty. How do you say “an ignorant English” in German ?

      • Yves / May 6 2013 8:59 am

        Thanks for support.

      • sugarcanegray / May 6 2013 2:48 am

        @Marshall Plan

        “Europe only had problems with two world wars, ethnic cleansing ( Germany, Serbia, Kosovo etc…), totalitarianism ; and finally needed the USA to restore peace, order and civilization.”

        Yes, there have been problems in Europe, as everywhere throughout the world. The US in particular is responsible for perhaps the largest genocide in history – the slaughter of the Native Americans. That’s a bit like the pot calling the kettle black – try again.

        As for the USA restoring peace – Germany & Italy declared war on the US, so they had no choice but to join the Allied efforts. Sounds like you need a history lesson.

        “Do you speak German ?”

        The Battle of Britain was won by Britain before the US even entered the war. The Germans tried but could not conquer Britain. A common misconception from Americans trying to us WWII as some kind of “we saved you” thing – we saved ourselves, and then rallied to help the Allied forces to victory across Europe.

        Of course, with no small part (in fact, far bigger than the US effort) from Russia – who really won WWII… hang on, weren’t they officially atheist at that point?

        “Ungrateful and petty. How do you say “an ignorant English” in German?”

        Ignorant Englisch, I believe. But as I said before – we won the Battle of Britain, and kept ourselves from speaking German.

      • Yves / May 6 2013 9:34 am

        Don’t you know that the USSR made a pact with the nazis ? 
        Afterward ,they shared Poland in September 1939.
        While France and Britain fought the nazis in 1940, the Russians tried to invade Finland.
        Am I wrong ? 
         

      • sugarcanegray / May 6 2013 1:10 pm

        Ah Yves, you and your red herrings. You are correct, the USSR did indeed invade Finland, the Finns fought valiantly and defeated them.

        The USSR did make a pact with the Nazis which was to share Poland – the USSR however were part of the Allied forces, and fought the nazis, aided by the UK and the US (not in troops but in supplies) after the nazis broke the pact and crossed into soviet territory. It is estimated that nearly half of all WWII casualties were on the Eastern Front – the USSR winning that was perhaps the most pivotal battle of WWII. Thoroughly brutal, the Eastern Front was one of the harshest and intense theatres in the history of modern warfare.

        Of course, none of this has anything to do with what the guy calling himself Marshall Plan was incorrectly saying above, and it has nothing to with this whole nonsense about atheists being racist.

      • Yves / May 8 2013 2:53 pm

        I truly can’t hold back to add fuel to the fire :

           “The USSR did make a pact with the Nazis [...]  

        I guess It was just a minor oversight ; atheists never turn blind eye to nazism. Except the many ones I met…

         [...] which was to share Poland”  

        The pact was not only about invading Poland , Finland, Latvia , Lithuania … 
        The deal with the Soviet’s included a clause in which the communists agreed to deliver the nazis the necessary oil to perform Blitzkrieg. The communists knew well Hitler couldn’t take control of Western Europe without the thorough support of Russia.
        So the Luftwaffe bombed Britain (ravaged Coventry for instance) thanks to Russian and Romanian oil.
        In the same way, the US fueled a fair amount of Britain’s war needs since the very beginning of the conflict.
        So the RAF also fought back the German air force thanks to the US oil supply.

        [...] after the nazis broke the pact and crossed into soviet territory

        Yes, the communists were happy with the pact.

         As for the USA restoring peace – Germany & Italy declared war on the US, so they had no choice but to join the Allied efforts.      

        The USA was brought into world war two because FDR signed an embargo to stop all shipping to Japan who was then fighting the UK and China in Asia and took control of French Indochina in accordance with the nazi’s predefined strategy. 
        The US embargo cut off the Japanese oil supply, which would have shut down Japan’s entire economy , because Japan had no indigenous oil production. 
        Months later the Japanese bombed the US warships based in Pearl Harbor. Then Hitler had no choice to declare war to the Americans who also supplied Britain and Russia with modern weapons.

         Of course, with no small part (in fact, far bigger than the US effort) from Russia – who really won WWII… hang on, weren’t they officially atheist at that point?  

        The USA were fighting both in Europe, in Africa ,in Asia, in Oceania (troops also were sent in Australia to prevent the Japanese invasion), in the Pacific Ocean , in the Atlantic Ocean ( almost every oceans and seas ) , in the air , on the ground , on and under the waters ; while the Soviet Union only fought in Europe (Stalin also made a non-aggression pact with Japan) and in your dreams. 
        During the same period , the USA also built an unseen chain supply to provide Britain and the USSR with weapons , food , oil, raw materials …
        Thousands of Liberty Ships sailed from America to Murmansk, to Iran and to Britain ports to accelerate the fall of the Third Reich. 
        What a minor contribution !

        On the contrary,the Russian bravery was a pure diplomatic fallacy used during the war to calm down the humbled atheists.
        The russian casualties were mainly due to their own idiocy.
        The Red Army brainwashed into communism suffered more from incompetence and immoral expectation from the nazi than from the German boldness. 
        The Great Purge weakened so much the armed forces that it could only incite Hitler to invade a country managed by incompetent people. 
        So many experienced army officers were executed for political and religious purposes that the leaderless Red Army became a bunch of tramps ill-equipped to cope with modern warfare. 
        At the dawn of Operation Barbarossa , the low-life atheist leaders made the same poor choices that made the Red Army incapable of smacking the least Finn , some months before in 1940.
        Whereas the Soviet armed forces outnumbered their German counterparts by a great margin ( during some battles, the Russians even outnumbered the nazis by two to one ) the Germans were fighting very far from their homeland with limited supply. 
        No heroism award can be granted to this immoral Soviet regime ; no doubt that if the Germans were not busy on the western front, the nazis would have crushed the communists. Nothing to see here with the Cossacks who opposed Napoleon.
        And the Russians logically never restored peace , order and civilisation in Europe and elsewhere. 

        The US anti-nazi effort started at the time the atheist commies hypocritically turned a blind eye to the racist and eugenic nazi’s projects.
        Moreover, Western Europe (including Britain) was rebuilt thanks to the Marshall Plan. No need the atheistic commies !
        Obviously , if Germany and the Soviet Union haven’t failed in their attempt to dominate the world , no doubt that the race classification dear to Hitler would not have meet any opposition. 
        White atheists would probably be happier today. 
         

      • Marshall Plan / May 7 2013 11:42 pm

        “Yes, there have been problems in Europe, as everywhere throughout the world. The US in particular is responsible for perhaps the largest genocide in history – the slaughter of the Native Americans. That’s a bit like the pot calling the kettle black – try again.”

        – Most of the Native Americans were slaughtered before 1776. 
        After the US Revolution, the Spaniards (in New Mexico, Florida for instance) and the French (in Louisiana) perhaps still slaughtered many other Natives. I guess the English and the Dutch exterminated some.
        Even the Russians martyrized Aleuts and some Native Americans in California , still after 1776. (And at the time Columbus discovered the New World , the Russians colonized Asian tribes in Siberia and progressively slaughtered many Native Siberians.)
        In addition, Europeans wherever they encountered Native Americans or Siberians, brought diseases not known to the Natives, who did not have or had lost traditional immunities. Disease killed more Natives than any other single cause. This was not thoroughly purposed like what occurred to minorities in Europe by the hands of totalitarian regimes. 

        History is definitely not your strong suit , isn’t it ?

      • sugarcanegray / May 8 2013 4:13 am

        Firstly, interesting how you switched from pidgin English to a rather more correct prose… I smell a rat…

        Anyway, first off, it’s a little ironic that you say I need a history lesson after your ridiculous claims about WWII. And, furthermore, none of what you’ve said actually changes anything either way.

        “Most of the Native Americans were slaughtered before 1776.”

        I’d like to see your sources for this piece – I cannot verify this either way, but I do know the native population went from 12 million in 1500 to barely 237,000 in 1900… so there’s plenty of genocide going on after 1776 too.
        Also, it’s not like the people suddenly changed after 1776 – it was the same people, European descendants now calling themselves Americans. Still the same people doing the slaughter.

        The original point I made still stands – you’ve got examples of genocide and ethnic cleansing all over the world. And none of this changes how wrong you were about the whole Brits speaking German thing.

      • Marshall Plan / May 8 2013 1:49 pm

        Knowing that this polemic will inevitably ends in xenophobic slurs , why would I take time to give an extensive answer in your native tongue ?
        Yes I rather like to past – what I’ve learn in my mother tongue – the english narrative about native siberians.
        I read that you don’t know what is Anglicanism so how can you know that the Russians were established in California and Oregon ?

      • Yves / May 8 2013 2:24 pm


        Also, it’s not like the people suddenly changed after 1776 – it was the same people, European descendants now calling themselves Americans. Still the same people doing the slaughter.

        No ! In 1776, the Spanish and the French powers were ruling 2/3 of the current US territories.

      • Marshall Plan / May 9 2013 12:50 pm

        “Firstly, it seems very strange that you feel it would end in xenophobic insults – please highlight where I have insulted anyone in a Xenophobic way, otherwise that accusation is merely born of the same bigotry that believes all Brits are hooligans and all atheists are racist.”

        – Are you paranoid or amnesiac ?

        “I’m dumbfounded at the amount of red herrings you and Yves throw around the place. In fact, they seem to be the basis of all of your retorts.”

        – In the nineteenth, the Russians were not communist. Don’t you know it ?

        “What I do find very strange, Marshall Plan, is how you have flipped between broken English, then perfect English, then back to even more broken English… you’re either 1 person pretending to not be a native English speaker, or you are several people with different native tongues. Very strange. So tell me, what gives? How did you concoct a completely word-perfect post on May 7 2013 11:42 pm and then come back with what I’ve just replied to? A little bit of honesty would be nice.”

        – You are not far to be right when you think we are several people : my girlfriend and I were using the same nickname -on the same device- and have some same opinions. We both are not native english speaker , both have a different native tongue and very unequal skills in english. If you speak a foreign tongue you sure know that exhaustion can either way make one say some very strange and funny sentences , especially in writing speechs.

      • itsnobody / Jun 17 2013 6:55 pm

        As usual atheists don’t know anything about history just like the atheists’ “Dark Ages” crap that’s been thoroughly debunked by the historical consensus.

        Most Native Americans were killed indirectly by the disease Europeans brought, not from any intentional genocide (Cook, Noble David. Born To Die).

      • Yves / Jun 18 2013 6:15 am

        This SugarcanegrayLiar has a lot to learn…

      • sugarcanegray / May 8 2013 3:54 pm

        @Yves

        “No ! In 1776, the Spanish and the French powers were ruling 2/3 of the current US territories.”

        I didn’t say otherwise, and you should obviously be aware that the Luisiana Purchase a few years later brought the americans to owning most of the country. As always, your nitpicking does not, in anyway, support the original, ridiculous and unfounded attacks.

        @Marshall Plan

        “Knowing that this polemic will inevitably ends in xenophobic slurs , why would I take time to give an extensive answer in your native tongue ?”

        Firstly, it seems very strange that you feel it would end in xenophobic insults – please highlight where I have insulted anyone in a Xenophobic way, otherwise that accusation is merely born of the same bigotry that believes all Brits are hooligans and all atheists are racist.

        “Yes I rather like to past – what I’ve learn in my mother tongue – the english narrative about native siberians.”

        Not really sure what this has to do with anything…

        “I read that you don’t know what is Anglicanism so how can you know that the Russians were established in California and Oregon ?”

        What does that have to do with anything we’re talking about?! Russians established in California and Oregon? I’m dumbfounded at the amount of red herrings you and Yves throw around the place. In fact, they seem to be the basis of all of your retorts.

        What I do find very strange, Marshall Plan, is how you have flipped between broken English, then perfect English, then back to even more broken English… you’re either 1 person pretending to not be a native English speaker, or you are several people with different native tongues. Very strange. So tell me, what gives? How did you concoct a completely word-perfect post on May 7 2013 11:42 pm and then come back with what I’ve just replied to? A little bit of honesty would be nice.

        But to both @Yves and @Marshall Plan – enough now, you’re not adding anything to the debate here, just throwing bizarre accusations around that one could only describe as “reaching”.

        Furthermore, it still amazes me how you all fail to see the utter hypocrisy in throwing around the bigoted statement like “all atheists are racist” without seeing the irony of how prejudiced your view point is. It’s no different than what you believe atheists are – and really just shows your true colours. I mean really, come on, you surely can’t be that daft? Or is your bigotry and prejudice somehow ok?

      • Yves / May 9 2013 12:39 am

         I think I’ve lost the thread of the conversation ,  I probably have to read again the additional comments posted recently. I told you straight out that I don’t take you seriously and scornfully overfly the vulgar comments mostly posted by some mallow-minded atheists like you ; so I may have misread too many to give a comprehensive answer. 

        You evidently are not genetically related to Sherlock Holmes because at the very first read I knew “Marshall Plan” is a theist , very likely a western European from a non English-speaking country. Nevertheless I may have missed some comments on other topics that could contradict my conclusions. 

         I didn’t say otherwise, and you should obviously be aware that the Luisiana Purchase a few years later brought the americans to owning most of the country.  
        Are you cerebrally challenged ? 
        Of course I know that John Wayne conquered the Far-West…the remaining territories. I have a TV ; I even have electricity.
        I told you BEFORE the Spanish and the French powers were ruling  2/3 of the CURRENT contiguous 48 American territories.  
        Beside, you were mocking my English… but Luisiana is not yet a US state. Your ignorance of geography is excusable insofar as you still have a lot to learn about England. 
        I was talking about Louisiana which at this time was a much larger region. 

        Saying  “all atheists are racist” is a bigoted statement , only reminds me that you still don’t know the history of scientific racism and the reason why the communists turned a blind eye to nazism. I know : you don’t care…
        Likewise don’t you think that all nazis are racist ? I’m quite sure you do believe some nazis are lovely people. I allege that you also could make a pact- if necessary –  with a neighbor who has publicly claimed he will kill or abduct some people , as long as you have common interests ; hoping that he will not break the pact. 

        I may write in a pidgin English too ; it goes without saying that it sounds like a bigoted remark coming from a very vulgar , ignorant and depraved person whose only anti-racist record is to try to have sex with every non-White female refugees who starved to death. 

        Yes, I have no evidence of that  , I just have met many atheists. It is quite enough !
         

      • sugarcanegray / May 8 2013 4:06 pm

        @Yves

        “I truly can’t hold back to add fuel to the fire”

        But you didn’t add fuel to the fire, you just went into a tirade that did not, in anyway, refute what I’d been saying. I was merely refuting the fact that the US “saved us” because it’s not true, and I was in part using the Russia as an example of how that wasn’t the case. Nearly half of all German casualties happened on the Eastern Front – I made no mention of bravery nor the heroics you bring up – I was stating a very simple fact. Without Russia, WWII could’ve turned out very differently.

        And, as I asked at the time, what the hell does this have to do with the topic at hand?Nothing! Just more red herrings because you’re trying to avoid confronting your own bigotry. Own up to it – admit you’re a bigot and we can move on.

      • Senor Sensible / May 9 2013 12:52 am

        Yves, you are scum.

    • Yves / Apr 10 2013 12:54 am

       
      so if we are religious, as you claim, and then going by your reasoning on the skinhead thing, we are racist, ergo – religion causes racism!
       
       
       
      Evidently, the one saying such idiocy does not know England has a state religion. 
       
      Evidently , this expert in statistics does not know that the skinheads are less than 50% in England.
       
      Evidently, he does not know the skinhead racism is based on atheistic race classification. 
       

      Evidently, since he does not know much about his country how can he be logical : thousands of non-religious skinheads out of 60 million Britons → religion cause racism.

      Evidently, this expert in profanity spend too much time playing video games and watching porns… when he’s not as drunk as a skunk.
       

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 10 2013 4:08 am

        It’s like talking to a brick wall – a brick wall that repeats themselves over and over and over and over….

        As I’ve said – I KNOW ENGLAND HAS A STATE RELIGION.
        Clearly I know skinheads make up less than 50% of our population.
        Skinhead racism is NOT BASED ON “ATHEISTIC RACE CLASSIFICATION” – that is just completely absurd.

        You’re clearly a nut. You don’t even bother reading what I post, you cannot understand the flaw in that logic. Earlier, you claimed Europe is more racist than the US, and now you’re saying England isn;t racist because we have a state religion. YET, religious people make up less than 40% of the UK population, but over 70% of the US population (officially a secular state)

        So, with your logic, we have this situation which you must answer:

        So, far fewer people believe in your stupid fairy stories in the UK than, say, the US. So are you saying the UK is less racist? Or more racist? If you’re saying we’re more racist, how can that be when we have a state religion? If you’re saying we’re less racist, how can that be so when we’ve fewer people believing in religion than the US?

        Please address that above paragraph otherwise there’s little point continuing.

        Also, you didn’t address the accusations regarding my attitudes towards my ex-wife – yet you brought this up claiming I’d been racist. This is the crux of your argument – calling names and making stuff up with no foundation whatsoever. There are racist people who are atheist, and there are racist people who are religious. The issue here is that you are applying a label to an entire group based not on evidence or research, but purely on the fact they are members of that group. This is exactly the same bigotry that is behind racism. But hang on, you’re religious, you cannot possibly be bigoted – yet, here were are.

        You are a prejudiced bigot, Yves, If you cannot see the utter hypocrisy of your view points, you need your head checked. You’re no better than a racist, homophobe, sexist or any other kind of bigot. Your god must be proud of you.

      • Yves / Apr 10 2013 7:50 am

        @ Sugarcanegray 

         
        Whatever… What about you ?What did you prove ?
         
         
        Except that you are a vulgar person. 
         
         
        Beside , do you really thing I expect something from you ?
        I have never asked you any evidence. 
         
        I just don’t care !   
         
        I know what I see and what I read. 
         
        You expect me to prove you were not xenophobic with your wife…but you have no evidence either that you had an indian wife.  
        It sounds like the same old alibi racist persons use to cover up their hate of non-Whites.  
         

         
        I only can look down upon the one
        who hardly knew : 
         
         
        • England has a state religion. 
         
        ( The 60% very secular English could easily democratically change this tradition…but they probably play PS/3 all time long. )
         
         
         
        • The US constitution is based on separation of state and church. 
         
        • China and North Korea are the most atheist countries. 
         
        • The skinhead racism is based on the Bible. 
         
        • Most popular english expressions. 
         
         

         
        I don’t take seriously the one who copy/paste his former comments by always repeating words I have never wrote such as r***beef
         
        You mocked my english but I speak four different languages as though you hardly speak your mother tongue.  
        So what ? Do you really think I can consider you as a potential challenger ?
         
         
        You are quite right : I can’t read seriously the posts you wrote while watching porns or trying to hack the girl next door computer. 
         
        Unless you sudden gain talent for reasoning you’d be better off to shut up. 

        @ Sugarcanegray 

         
        Whatever… What about you ?What did you prove ?
         
         
        Except that you are a vulgar person. 
         
         
        Beside , do you really thing I expect something from you ?
        I have never asked you any evidence. 
         
        I just don’t care !   
         
        I know what I see and what I read. 
         
        You expect me to prove you were not xenophobic with your wife…but you have no evidence either that you had an indian wife.  
        It sounds like the same old alibi racist persons use to cover up their hate of non-Whites.  
         

         
        I only can look down upon the one
        who hardly knew : 
         
         
        • England has a state religion. 
         
        ( The 60% very secular English could easily democratically change this tradition…but they probably play PS/3 all time long. )
         
         
         
        • The US constitution is based on separation of state and church. 
         
        • China and North Korea are the most atheist countries. 
         
        • The skinhead racism is based on the Bible. 
         
        • Most popular english expressions. 
         
         

         
        I don’t take seriously the one who copy/paste his former comments by always repeating words I have never wrote such as r***beef
         
        You mocked my english but I speak four different languages as though you hardly speak your mother tongue.  
        So what ? Do you really think I can consider you as a potential challenger ?
         
         
        You are quite right : I can’t read seriously the posts you wrote while watching porns or trying to hack the girl next door computer. 
         
        Unless you sudden gain talent for reasoning you’d be better off to shut up. 

        @ Sugarcanegray 

         
        Whatever… What about you ?What did you prove ?
         
         
        Except that you are a vulgar person. 
         
         
        Beside , do you really thing I expect something from you ?
        I have never asked you any evidence. 
         
        I just don’t care !   
         
        I know what I see and what I read. 
         
        You expect me to prove you were not xenophobic with your wife…but you have no evidence either that you had an indian wife.  
        It sounds like the same old alibi racist persons use to cover up their hate of non-Whites.  
         

         
        I only can look down upon the one
        who hardly knew : 
         
         
        • England has a state religion. 
         
        ( The 60% very secular English could easily democratically change this tradition…but they probably play PS/3 all time long. )
         
         
         
        • The US constitution is based on separation of state and church. 
         
        • China and North Korea are the most atheist countries. 
         
        • The skinhead racism is only based on binge drinking.
         
        • Most popular english expressions. 
         
         

         
        I don’t take seriously the one who copy/paste his former comments by always repeating words I have never wrote such as r***beef
         
        You mocked my english but I speak four different languages as though you hardly speak your mother tongue.  
        So what ? Do you really think I can consider you as a potential challenger ?
         
         
        You are quite right : I can’t read seriously the posts you wrote while watching porns or trying to hack the girl next door computer. 
         
        Unless you sudden gain talent for reasoning you’d be better off to shut up. 

      • Yves / Apr 10 2013 7:55 am

        Oops, something went wrong with the last comment .

      • Yves / Apr 10 2013 7:58 am

        This is the right version .

        @ Sugarcanegray 

         
        Whatever… What about you ?What did you prove ?
         
         
        Except that you are a vulgar person. 
         
         
        Beside , do you really thing I expect something from you ?
        I have never asked you any evidence. 
         
        I just don’t care !   
         
        I know what I see and what I read. 
         
        You expect me to prove you were not xenophobic with your wife…but you have no evidence either that you had an indian wife.  
        It sounds like the same old alibi racist persons use to cover up their hate of non-Whites.  
         

         
        I only can look down upon the one
        who hardly knew : 
         
         
        • England has a state religion. 
         
        ( The 60% very secular English could easily democratically change this tradition…but they probably play PS/3 all time long. )
         
         
         
        • The US constitution is based on separation of state and church. 
         
        • China and North Korea are the most atheist countries. 
         
        • The skinhead racism is based on the Bible. 
         
        • Most popular english expressions. 
         
         

         
        I don’t take seriously the one who copy/paste his former comments by always repeating words I have never wrote such as r***beef
         
        You mocked my english but I speak four different languages as though you hardly speak your mother tongue.  
        So what ? Do you really think I can consider you as a potential challenger ?
         
         
        You are quite right : I can’t read seriously the posts you wrote while watching porns or trying to hack the girl next door computer. 
         
        Unless you sudden gain talent for reasoning you’d be better off to shut up. 

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 10 2013 9:06 am

        what I have showed is that you simply cannot say “all atheists are racist” – there is no evidence for this. It would be exactly the same as me saying “all catholics are child rapists” – it would be absolutely absurd to make the assumption that because some catholic priests have molested children, all catholics must moleste children.

        And that’s basically the entire premise of this blog – unfounded bigotry towards a group of people based on nothing more than their belonging to that group. It’s meaningless and untrue and highly hypocritical.

        All you have done is misinterpret what I’ve said, repeat the same old things I’ve answered a dozen times already, and continue to show yourself to be a bigot. In that sense, you are far more vulgar than myself, because I simply do not have your bigotry.

      • Yves / Apr 10 2013 6:41 pm

        Are you cerebrally challenged ?

        Atheism is historically based on race classification.

        But as you have just learned that your country is a monarchy …

        Marc Dutroux as most child abusers are atheists. We have many case of child abuse in french public schools every month … ( Last month a recidivist school director was jailed in Normandy. )
        And much less in religious schools. The reason why the sex scandal is less important in the french Catholic Church than elsewhere is because the atheistic sex abuses are – in France – much higher because France is the most european secular country.


        It is a mechanical effect …

      • Yves / Apr 10 2013 6:54 pm

        Only religions stood against social-Darwinism !

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 11 2013 2:00 am

        “Atheism is historically based on race classification.”

        Are you for real? You seriously don’t even know what atheism is, do you?

        Let me explain: atheism, as the word suggests, is merely the lack of theism. That’s it, nothing more, nothing less. It has nothing to do with race, gender, or any other classification. It’s the word “theism” with an “a” in front of it – in the same way asymmetry just means un-symmetrical, atheism just means un-theistic. Blimey, even young children understand that.

        “The reason why the sex scandal is less important in the french Catholic Church than elsewhere is because the atheistic sex abuses are – in France – much higher because France is the most european secular country.”

        Actually abuse by catholic priests is seen all over the catholic world. It’s committed by those who believe in God – not by those who don’t. But again you totally missed the point of why I mentioned that – it would be stupid to infer ALL catholics are pedophiles, in exactly the same way it’s insane to say all atheists are racist.

        “Only religions stood against social-Darwinism !”

        No.

      • Yves / Apr 11 2013 4:06 am

        @ sugarcanegray :
         
         
        How can an ignorant person know more about what is going on abroad as he still can’t make Britain out .
         
         
        Evidenty you know better than me what is the situation in the french Catholic church ( and around the world ) and about the history of scientific racism <officially taught by French anticlerical teachers during decades…

        Evidently you probably also know that the aryan concept is a french biological doctrine ( long before the existence of Germany )…  even though you have proved you don’t know much about your homeland.  
         
        French anticlerical networks updated their racist viewpoints later on by supporting both Darwin theories and race classification based on their so-called evolution scale ; finally some Germans imported the aryan concept in their very next door Germany…some years before Hitler’s birth.
         
        Beside, the racism word is from french origin … As I said before, it was an official doctrine during la 3rd république sponsored by officials such as Jules Ferry who was a fierce atheist ; he also was in charge of schools and education. 
         
        It is because of him that french school manuals officially taught race classification long before the nazis came to power. It is also because of him that Christians were set apart from the public school teachings.
         
         
        My words are more reliable than yours, because at least I know that :
          
         
        • England having a state religion is the less secular country in Europe.
         
        • The USA are not a theocracy and first separated state and church. 
         
        • China and North Korea are atheist countries →tyrannies 
         
        They were much more tolerant and respectful before . Is it coincidental ?
         
        • etc…

         
        I don’t have to prove this … Just go back to school !
         
         
        Let’s see how could an average atheist oppose scientific racism :
         
         My former indian wife cooked good chicken curry but she had a strange accent … 
         
        Now that she left , I call her the  “Paki girl “.
         
         
        But the best atheistic advocation of race equality is :

         I am not a racist because I have a Bob Marley CD.   
         
        A bit vulgar but very convincing indeed. 
         

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 11 2013 4:25 am

        “How can an ignorant person know more about what is going on abroad as he still can’t make Britain out”

        I know Britain better than you – you say we’re not secular, yet fewer people believe in God in Britain than most European countries, it’s not that much more than France (~38% UK, ~27% FR).

        Things like the aryan concept are not atheism. As I said, and as any child can tell you, atheism is simply the lack of theism. Anything else you try and tack on to it is purely in your head. Also, the logic doesn’t follow. You’re saying that because people who believe in the Aryan concept might be atheist, all atheists feel the same. As I keep saying, this is like someone saying all catholics are pedophiles – it’s a non-sequitur.

        Your words are anything but reliable, Yves. You’ve claimed that I spat on the French (which I didn’t – read that comment again and learn the difference between 1st and third person grammatical statements) you claimed I was racist towards my wife (which I wasn’t) you claim I don’t know that Britain has a state religion (which I do) and you claim that all atheists are racist with no evidence or not having met or interviewed all atheists.

        “• China and North Korea are atheist countries →tyrannies”
        They are, North Korea more so than China. Implying atheism is a causal factor is a non-sequitur.

        “• The USA are not a theocracy and first separated state and church.”

        This is true, but religion plays a much bigger part in politics and everyday life than in Britain – it effects what is taught in school, access to services like abortion etc. The US, whilst officially a secular country has the largest belief in God in the western world – over 70%, and belief in God plays a massive part in who runs the country.

        As for the bit about “scientific racism” – what the hell? What does any of that have to do with anything we’re talking about? Personally, I find the fact that you’ve used the phrase “P*** Girl” to be highly offensive, and massively incorrect (Indian and Pakistani are two different peoples). You’re reaching with this, trying to put words in my mouth or imply in someway behaviour from myself which you can’t possibly know anything about. Very sad and childish indeed and just highlights your own bigotry.

        “But the best atheistic advocation of race equality is :

        I am not a racist because I have a Bob Marley CD.

        A bit vulgar but very convincing indeed. ”

        That makes zero sense and has nothing to do with anything we’re talking about. Yves, all you’re doing is making stuff up to try and prove and unprovable hypothesis. Atheism does not equal racism any more than Catholicism equals pedophilia.

        You are constantly trying to bend reality to fit your own bigoted opinions.

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 11 2013 4:44 am

        By the way Yves, I do find it strange how both yourself and the author of this blog are so guilty of the same thing you’re accusing atheists of being – that being unfounded bigotry. The claim of all atheists being racist is as bad as claiming something negative about a race of people – they have the same ignorance and poor logic behind them. So how do you reconcile this hypocrisy with your faith? Isn’t hypocrisy considered a bad thing in the eyes of your religion, or is it perfectly acceptable?

      • Yves / Apr 11 2013 8:12 am

        @ sugarcanegray :

        I TRY NOT TO PROVE ANYTHING ! I DON’T CARE. 
         
        I DON’T CARE ABOUT YOUR DEFINITIONS WHICH NEVER MATCH THE FACTS.

        If you want to believe you are right. Do it !
         
        No French or german historian can deny the influence of french anticlericalism in the consolidation of scientific racism before Hitler came to power. 


        Call me a bigot if you please, I just repeat what I know for living in the most secular country. Beside, your statistic about french secularism is as phoney as usual. But yes, France is becoming less secular because France is now more multicultural …but the racist Front National has much more atheist supporters (75%) than Christians ,    according to an internal study . Heathen are as numerous as Christians. So …
         
         Atheism does not equal racism any more than Catholicism equals pedophilia.  
        Yes, there are tons of non-religious child abusers in public schools and many atheists in prisons.
        But french atheists never disputed “the official race inequality theory” during decades.
         
         
        Evidently you don’t know religions : the Bible teaches that religion is definitely Not compatible with apostasy. ( Thessalonians 2:2 )
                                         ↓  ↑ 
        Atheism is definitely Not compatible with Christianity. 
                                           ↓ 
        Atheism is compatible with → scientific racism → nazism
         
         
        I twice told you I don’t care talking with you… You have proved that you can’t be considered as a valuable challenger. 
        I do despise you. So you would be better off to spend your time with your atheist friends or playing video games , because I will not change my mind for you. I don’t expect you to change your mind either. 

        ADIOS FOR EVER !

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 11 2013 8:15 am

        thank the lord!! (sic) no more lies, bigotry and absolute BS! :)

        take care Yves and good luck, it’s been utterly painful trying to educate your bigoted mind!

      • Yves / Apr 11 2013 8:21 am

        @ Sugarcanegray :

        Thanks but I don’t want to be educated by you.

        AU REVOIR !

      • Yves / Apr 11 2013 9:05 am

        @ Sugarcanegray :
         
        Sorry to come back to you :

         Personally, I find the fact that you’ve used the phrase “P*** Girl” to be highly offensive, and massively incorrect (Indian and Pakistani are two different.
         
        I was once called a P***ki by an english soccer supporter ; as I have nothing to see with Pakistan , a friend told me that this racial slur aimed all non-Whites ( try Google ) during years. But I know that things have change since some years , this is no more a generic racial slur. 

        No need to answer… Thanks ! Else, just comment this post. Only this post.
         

      • sugarcanegray / Apr 11 2013 9:15 am

        Yves, you have my sympathy there. Unfortunately there is a level of racism in the UK, especially at the level of our football supporters – they are really an embarrassment to most of us here. I can only apologise to anyone in the world who has the misfortune to have to deal with the outright ignorance of typical English football supporters.

      • Yves / Apr 11 2013 9:52 am

        Sugarcanegray,

        This time , I will not dispute the sincerity of your sympathy.

        I don’t took the english people for responsible of hooliganism because I also met very polite and nice Britons.
        Hooligans are not official representatives of the UK.
        We also have such morally challenged individuals in stadiums ( I told you about apes songs ) .
        Plus , for what I know , there is less racism in Britain than in France. I know lots of non-White Frenchs who agree with me. French racists are just slyer…

        Thanks and good bye !

      • Yves / Apr 11 2013 1:38 pm

        Hi again Sugacangray :
         
        Sorry again to come back but I have just heard about 2 very recent cases of child abuses in the very secular France.
        I can’t hold back to prove that there are much more child rapists outside of the Catholic church.  

        • The husband of a professional baby-sitter in Calvados has been jailed Wednesday ( April 10 , 2013 ) for sex assault and rape. He is charged with child abuse ; he could have rape about 20 children during 15 years.

         

        http://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/calvados-le-mari-d-une-assistante-maternelle-ecroue-pour-viols-sur-mineurs-11-04-2013-2717469.php

         

        •  Yesterday ( April 10 , 2013 ) , a 26 year old man abducted an 11 year old girl. 

         http://www.hitwest.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49419:enlevement-en-vendee-&catid=13617:infos-locales&Itemid=25
         

        Sad but true ; there are so many child abuses in France that if these sex offenders were believers , the french atheists would not hesitate to put forward their religiosity. They always do !

        The last case involving a priest happened years ago …

        If you want to answer, please only comment this post.
         

      • Yves / Apr 21 2013 8:41 am

         
        I am sick of having said I don’t dispute your sincere sympathy. I was wrong .
         
         

      • Anoymous@pigsbrains.com / May 8 2013 3:00 pm

        Yves, you do know that you are completely the dumbest person ever to type shit on the internet? Do you know how fucking dumb you are? Clinically thick as two shits. You know nothing, are full of unfounded dumb theories and you’re fat and ugly. Stop posting shit here. Everyone hates you. PS There is no god, and if he existed he would think you a fuckwit too.

      • Yves / May 8 2013 3:50 pm

        Oh my GOD ! I’m really impress… How many times did you spend in prison to learn how to spit curses ? 
        So you don’t like me ! Maybe I should be sad… I will think about it.
        The two thick shits you talk about were ejected by your mother’s infected vagina nine months after you were conceived with the help of her aryan clients at the cost of 1£.
        My GOD will be happy to make you shut up along with the other nazi trolls ; you will soon feel how angry HE is with the low life scumbags. Just get ready !

      • Anoymous@pigsbrains.com / May 8 2013 4:49 pm

        For fucks’s sake you entirely stupid cunt, if you call me a Nazi for calling you an idiot, then you are a clueless turd. People who don’t believe in God are not Nazis. They are smart people. Your world view is invalid. You have no friends. You never will lay with a woman (perhaps with a goat). Your God is a non existent being, made up from the misplaced hopes and dreams of people who are subintellectual. Remember the commandment – thou shall not bare false witness? That is God telling you not to open your fucking mouth, because every time you do the vilest, dumbest, slimiest, most incoherent bucket of shit comes out of it. You are wrong on everything. You should have been aborted.

        PS When do you graduate high school?

      • Yves / May 8 2013 5:50 pm

        Please nazi troll, don’t be so mean. I know that you only have sex with your fat sister to keep the race pure but I am quite sure one day you will meet a pretty toothless blond atheist girl in East Germany who will agree to give birth to your sons according to the Mein Kampf guideline. 
        So I will pray GOD to keep you away from incestuous thoughts ; right now I just can advise you to stop screaming “Heil Hitler!” each time you put your dirty tiny dick in the ass of your dead little brother you hide under your bed.
        I know it is the traditional atheistic fashion to revere the lost family members …

      • Yves / May 9 2013 12:00 am

        Atheist, stop jerking off before Hitler’s portrait.
        Why don’t you just watch porns  with your mother ?

      • God / May 8 2013 11:16 pm

        Yves, you’re still a dumbfuck.
        Love, God.

      • God / May 9 2013 12:07 am

        Yves is to be smited. Choked to death on his own vomit tonight. You were warned, but the human race will be better off with out you. I’m going to have to move your atoms into a black hole. It offends me that you exist. I didn’t create all creation for it all to turn into a miserable fucking stupid cunt. Sorry everybody. I really fucked up creating Yves. Fuck, come back Lucifer, all is forgiven, you’re a fucking saint compared to this miserable bucket of shit, piss and vomit.

      • Yves / May 9 2013 12:53 am

        Sugarcanegray , you’re definitely the depraved nazi you seemed to be. 
        You’re just paranoid. Why don’t you enlist in the KGB or in the Gestapo ? They need people like you , they just don’t care that you are a junkie ; they need proud white trash. 
        You’re even not funny. It looks like that even in your mother tongue you are incapable of British humour. Though I am quite sure you’re a Benny Hill look-alike. 
         

      • Marshall Plan / May 9 2013 12:52 pm

        Yves, we spreken een beetje Vlaams, mijn vriendin is Belgische. Kijk mee op de site van Lourdes katholieke. Ik weet zeker dat je weet wat ik bedoel. Ik geef je een e-mailadres.
        Als u akkoord gaat niet beantwoorden, ga direct naar de pagina van St. Teresa van Avilla en spreekt geen Engels.
        Mengsel Vlaamse, Franse en Italiaanse aan de nazi’s te voorkomen gebruiken Google vertaling.
        Een gids om ons gemakkelijk te vinden: Heilige Geest. Pas op, wordt de nazi zeker medeplichtig met hackers. WordPress werd aangevallen vorige maand ; er is niet alleen DDoS-aanvallen.

      • Yves / May 9 2013 1:56 pm

        Sorry Marshall Plan, I am a paedophile.

      • Yves / May 9 2013 2:16 pm

        @ sugarcanegray ,

        You are just an impersonator ; you wrote comments under the nickname of others just like you act in everyday life. The usual atheist manners to lay with girls : cheats , tricks and lies.

        You are a degenerated usurper.

      • Yves / May 9 2013 6:27 pm

        @ Marshall
        Op dit moment in Nederland, een grootschalige cyberaanval is aan de gang? Dekking nieuws. Heb je mijn boodschap?

  44. Havenn / Feb 2 2012 11:11 am

    Just a few short responses.

    #10 – Do you take pleasure in telling lies or are you just so gullible that you believe any anti-religious lie you hear?
    Actually in order for something I say to be a lie, it would have to be unproveable. I prefer to stick to scientific truths and leave speculation and conjecture to others that don’t mind promoting unsubstantiated arguments.

    #9 – Are you only capable of mimicking and copying arguments you heard from Dawkins and other atheists?
    Are you capable of coming up with arguments beyond what you can mimic and copy from the Bible? I don’t need any other atheist to tell me what I believe. I came to my conclusions on my own when I was young, before I had even heard of Dawkins or any other famous atheist.

    #8 – What’s the reason that you continue to use racist atheists as viable sources, celebrate racist atheist biologists and racist/atheist countries?
    Whom do you speak of? I have never, nor will ever, support racism or separatist ideas given that would only work to discriminate against myself and those I love (theist and atheist alike).

    #7 – Do you have any independent mind of your own or ability to question what other atheists say or think?
    My ideas and thoughts are created and compared objectively to the information that I know and gather. As a general rule I do not take what anyone else says as law. I question everything, accepting or not accepting ideas based on their merit.

    #6 – Why do you consider any criticism of atheists, atheistic arguments, or atheistic beliefs as “trolling” but not consider condemning, ridiculing, or making fun of religion as “trolling”?
    I do consider this trolling. It depends on the forum that the troll is entering upon. Trolling is entering into any forum and mindlessly disrupting the conversation regardless of ideas.

    #5 – Why have you intentionally remained silent in opposition to racism but not silent in opposition to Intelligent Design, Creationism, and many other things?
    Who has remained silent? Christians are some of the biggest perpetrators of war and oppression in history. Indeed, your thoughts in this very article are exemplary of oppressive thoughts against a group of people you deem as inferior. I have fought my entire life for equal rights for all people regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, and yes, even belief.

    #4 – Why do you value high IQ as being worth more than contributions?
    I value free thought more than high IQ. Everyone has different skills, different capabilities, and different ways of contributing to the world around them.

    #3 – Why do you discourage belief without evidence, intuition, and originality?
    I believe everyone has the right to believe whatever they choose as long as they do not force their beliefs onto me. I would argue that believing the word of one book doesn’t support originality though.

    #2 – Why are you an anti-science fanatic who strongly opposes free and open criticism, scrutiny, and questioning?
    I have never met an atheist that is anti-science. As a group we hold in high regard proveable fact based on mathematic and scientific inquiry. One of the greatest aspects of the scientific community is the free flowing ideas that allow us to criticism, scrutinize, and question all hypothesis, theories, and laws that pass before the community. In this way we are able to build on each others work, improve it, correct it, and create greater and more accurate information.

    #1 – Who do you hate more, Jews or Muslims?
    I don’t. Why do you hate? I thought hate was an anti-christian principle.

    • havennyx@gmail.com / Feb 17 2012 1:51 pm

      I see that, even though I gave you reasonable answers, you have refused to address them.

  45. Abdul-Wadood Muwahid / Jan 31 2012 10:33 am

    10) athiests hate muslims more, muslims are recently trying to create a state governed by the law of Allah swt (god) in places like somalia, afghanistan etc etc however it seems like nato is not very happy about it.

    saudi and iran should not be confused with shariah law

    http://quran.com/

  46. the warrioress / Jan 31 2012 9:09 am

    I’m so sorry to read this..

    We need to strive to love everyone; Jesus did. He loved even those who murdered Him.

    The atheist is someone with a wall up but I believe that they really may be thinking about God more than many Christians do, sincerely.

    • Zak / Feb 6 2012 11:18 am

      In a sense you are probably right. I think about god, or the delusion of god, a lot. In this culture, you can’t help but be confronted by it all the time.

      But I also spend a lot of time thinking about my house in minecraft. Doesn’t make it real.

  47. NotAScientist / Jan 31 2012 8:48 am

    I have a question as well.

    Why should I dignify any questions from you with an answer, given you are obviously bigoted against atheists?

  48. qatommy / Jan 30 2012 11:43 pm

    i have a question: you start your post with “for the lowest of the low, the worst people, the most disgusting form of life, the most hateful of all human beings, the lowest possible form of existence – the atheist.” Yet, many of your questions seem to indicate that it is the atheists, and not you perhaps, who are full of hate. Can you clarify your position? i’m not trying to incite a riot, just responding to an inquiry in a friendly way.

    • qatommy / Jan 30 2012 11:45 pm

      Sorry, i reversed that. Yes, your post starts by accusing atheists of being hateful, and yet it is your questions that indicate it is you who are full of hate. Can you clarify?

Trackbacks

  1. 10 Questions for Atheists « JoeWo Joe Wosik Blog
  2. Can't Forget Those Offensive Questions, Can We? - Bitchspot
  3. 10 Questions For Atheists | Robert Nielsen

Post a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers

%d bloggers like this: