Skip to content
August 15, 2011 / itsnobody

Debunking the atheist/racist Muslim rape lie in Sweden

Atheists or racists have claimed that the rape and crime in Sweden is caused primarily by Muslims and because of the Muslim population in Sweden. Initially I thought this could have been the case, but upon investigating this claim I found it to be false.

So Muslims (and basically any non-white immigrant) are blamed for all the problems and crime in Sweden.

In Sweden, a liberal atheist country, throwing rocks at Somalians and beating Jews is just normal and common, and normally accepted by liberal atheist Swedes. I think Sweden’s new slogan should be “Come come beat a Jew, this is Sweden”. Beating Jews is like a national pastime in Sweden. If someone beats up a Jew in Sweden all the Swedes are just thinking “What’s the big deal? It’s just a Jew”. Don’t try wearing a kippah or yamaka or whatever in Sweden. Everyone in Sweden either is a Nazi, personally knows a Nazi, or knows someone who knows a Nazi because Nazism is popular in Sweden.

In order to find out if Muslims are actually responsible for the crime and rape in Sweden I looked at the Muslim population by country according to the October 2009 Pew Report and then I looked at rape statistics by country according to the U.N. statistics.

I only looked at European countries or countries made up of mostly Europeans knowing that atheists or racists would dismiss low rape rates in Muslim countries as being caused by a lack of reporting rapes.

UPDATE (11/27/2013):  After this update, I’m done with this article.Atheists really need to learn a good lesson about telling lies.

This can only happen if: There’s a 0% Muslim population in Sweden and lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants.

So act now Sweden, please ban and deport all Muslim immigrants from Sweden, then bring in lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants. If they can’t ban them then I hope they can try to get just the Muslim immigrants to voluntarily leave.

I hope that every European country and Western country does this as well, but especially Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and New Zealand.

I’m not suggesting that they should do this, but that they NEED to do this. They just NEED to learn a good lesson about telling lies and this is the only way.

This would ruin everything for the Nazi movement, now wouldn’t it?

So based on the 2012 crime statistics Sweden’s murder rate has decreased, is the lowest in all of Sweden history since the 1970s and 1960s, and is lower than all 50 US states and almost every country’s murder rate (the US state with the lowest murder rate had a murder rate of 1.1 per 100,000 in 2012, Sweden’s murder rate in 2012 was 0.71 per 100,000).

(There were 68 homicides in Sweden in 2012 which comes to a murder rate of 0.71 per 100,000 in a population of 9.6 million).

Sources: http://bra.se/bra/brott–statistik/mord-och-drap.html, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/4tabledatadecoverviewpdf/table_4_crime_in_the_united_states_by_region_geographic_division_and_state_2011-2012.xls

This kind of reminds of me of the “Boy Who Cried Wolf” story, atheists can keep crying and crying with their low-life atheist mouth about all the non-existent ‘crime’ going on in Sweden, just like boy did, then if there’s a 0% Muslim population (and lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants) and there really is lots of real crime (not this non-violent rapes with no injuries crap) no one’s going to care.

It’s just what they deserve.

Now if you’re a fool (atheist) here’s what you’ll believe: “What’s going in Sweden is that right after Swedes modified their rape definition and rape counting laws Muslims decided to only do non-violent rapes with no injuries there, but decided not to do any homicides, car thefts, or anything else difficult to falsely report that doesn’t rely on the rate of reporting”.

Now if you’re not stupid here’s what you’ll believe: “The reason why Sweden’s homicide rate is extremely low and reported rape rate is high is because of Sweden’s unique rape counting laws, rape definition, and because the reported rape rate relies on the rating of reporting and is extremely easy to falsely report”.

Now some questions for a fool (atheist):

- Why was the reported number of homicides in Sweden 232 but the actual number 92 and over 100 of the reported homicides false reports in 2009 (UNOC gives 93, Eurostat gives 92)?
– Why do many  atheist blog sites and atheist fan sites still cite the incorrect reported 232 or 230 value as evidence that crime went up in Sweden even though the actual was 92?
– Why did Swedes stoop to the level of attempting to falsely report homicides in 2009?
– Why don’t atheists ever cite valid sources but only blog sites and YouTube videos?
– Why don’t atheists ever mention the murder rates in these countries (Sweden, Norway, etc…)?
– Why do atheists always avoid mentioning the crime statistics that don’t rely on the rate of reporting and are difficult to falsely report?
– Isn’t it true that falsely reporting a homicide is extremely difficult and homicides have decreased dramatically in Sweden?
– Isn’t it true that falsely reporting a car theft is extremely difficult since cars have license plate numbers and car thefts have decreased in Sweden?
– Isn’t it true that  falsely reporting a “non-violent rape with no injury” is extremely easy and it only went up in Sweden after they modified their rape counting laws so that 1 report could count as 100,300, or a 1000 ‘rapes’ and nationalism became more popular?
– Isn’t it true that without Sweden’s rape-counting laws their reported rape rate would only be around 2.0-4.0 per 100,000?
– Isn’t it true that Swedish journalists claim that most reported rapes in Sweden are false reports?
– Isn’t it true that there’s no way to know the actual number of “non-violent rapes with no injuries” that occurred in a country since it relies heavily on the rate of reporting and is extremely easy to falsely report?
– Isn’t it true that in most Western countries they don’t consider non-violent rapes with no injuries to be a big deal for White males unless it’s a child rape, drug rape, there’s more than 1 witness, or there’s video camera/picture evidence?
– Isn’t it true that White males are reported far less often for crime in general?
– Isn’t it true that the European countries with the highest murder rates and most crime (Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia) have the least non-white immigration, lowest percentage of Muslims in the world, and purest European stock?
– Estonia is the least religious most atheistic country in the entire world according to multiple sources (2008 Gallup poll, 2005 Eurobarometer poll), but Estonia consistently has one of the highest murder rates in Europe year after year so why don’t atheists help out Estonia for (they have nearly 0% Muslims and non-whites as well)?
– Isn’t it true that North Korea is an officially atheist state, ethnically homogeneous with a 0% Muslim population, but has the highest murder rate in East Asia and also a global hunger index worse than many African countries?

I’m still waiting for Westerners to name just 1 White male non-violent rape case that matches this criteria that ever became big news in the Western media:
– Not a child rape
– Not a drug rape
– No objective injuries
– No video camera or picture evidence or anything like that
– Not a celebrity or special person
– Only 1 witness

It’s part of White Western culture to view women as lower and White males as superior, that’s why they can’t name even 1 case like the above that ever became a big deal in the Western media for a White male. Polls show that “non-violent rapes with no injuries” are very common in Western countries among White males, but they aren’t usually reported for it.

If Westerners want me to consider non-violent rapes with no injuries to be a big deal all they have to do is start considering non-violent rapes with no injuries to be a big deal for White Western males (which they don’t).

Otherwise if you don’t consider it to be a big deal for a White male then we know that it has nothing to do with the alleged act or crime but with racism and prejudice, which we know is the case since Westerners can’t even name 1 White male rape case that matches the criteria that I listed that ever became a big deal in the Western media.

The car vandalism experiment showed that White males were reported 10 times less often than black males were for vandalizing a car in broad daylight in an area where many people are walking by (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cCQU0jt4cs, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLXCCcqnY-I).

So since White males were reported 10 times less often for a crime as objective as vandalizing a car in broad daylight I would imagine that if White males were reported as often it would probably be closer to around 90-99% White males in the “non-violent rape with no injuries” crime statistic.

The Wikileaks co-founder (a White male) was accused of rape in Sweden and Westerners came out to say that it’s no big deal, it’s just the rate of reporting and the country’s rape laws (he of course had more than 1 accuser, so it doesn’t match the above criteria).

So if they’re really serious all they have to do is start considering it to be a serious issue for White males, then I’ll think of it as a big deal for non-whites too.

The only way I can consider it to be a big deal is if it’s a big deal for White males as well. The type of adult rape cases that are a big deal for White males in the Western media are the ones with killings and injuries like the Craigslist killer, Ted Bundy, David Gore, etc…if these cases involved no objective injuries or killings it wouldn’t be a big deal in the Western media since they are White males.

Even when White males like the Norwegian terrorist shooter kill 77 it’s not viewed as that big of a deal by Westerners, many defended him and it went off the media like 2 days after people found out that it was a White non-Muslim, he got only 21 years for killing 77 people!

Who gets 21 years for killing 77 people? LOL!

On the other hand there are lots of “non-violent rapes with no injuries” cases with non-white males where the racist/atheist jury gives them much more 21 years in prison.

So this means Westerners consider a White male killing 77 people as not nearly as bad as a “non-violent non-child non-drug rape involving absolutely no objective injuries from a non-white male”.

I’m still waiting for a White Westerner to name just 1 White male rape case that fits the above criteria that I listed that became a big deal in the Western media.

They can’t, so we know with 100% certainty that this whole thing has nothing to do with the alleged crime or act but just with prejudice and racism.

They can keep crying and crying with their low-life atheist mouth. An atheist to me is like nothing, not even partially human, but fully subhuman, and lower than a cat, a dog, and even a pet goldfish.

Since I’m non-violent and discourage violence I can only dream that a natural disaster comes and completely kills every atheist in the world off with all the life in them gone. I don’t even know how anyone can live being as terrible and disgusting as an atheist is. Their entire life is just spent hating others day after day.

There’s not even one atheist in the whole fuckin world willing to open up their low-life atheist mouth and oppose racism and racist atheists, they are truthfully the worst of all subhuman beings.

When I see an atheist crying I think in my mind “Well what a great joy it is that this disgusting low-life racist is now crying”. Cry you little low-life bitch you, cry, cry with your little low-life faggot loving lips.

Don’t hesitate Sweden, ban and deport just Muslim immigrants now, you can stop those “non-violent rapes with no injuries” (since they can’t falsely report a car theft or homicide).

But hurry up before another White non-Muslim male comes out and kills 77 or more people in Scandinavia!

Of course if it was up to me personally I would prefer if they banned all non-whites in general, but they’re turning it into a joke so I hope they get what they’re asking for – a 0% Muslim population and lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants.

The reason why I would prefer a 0% non-white population is so that I can point and laugh them, just like how I can point and laugh at the Northern European countries with the highest murder rates (Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia) since they have nearly 0% non-whites and Muslims.

Just look at Latvians and how lame and pathetic they are, when you see a Latvian’s face it looks just like they’re about murder and kill someone. I can laugh right in front of a low-life atheist Latvian’s face and they can’t say anything with their low-life faggot-loving atheist mouth.

Don’t hesitate, view atheists as fully subhuman, like nothing.

New UPDATE (06/06/2013):Sweden’s latest murder statistics have come out for the year of 2012, and this is really bad news for atheists/racists.Remember the murder statistic is a very objective crime statistic since it doesn’t rely much upon the rate of reporting, a country’s laws, and is difficult to falsely report. So the homicide rate and count is very objective when compared to many other crime statistics.Since atheists as a whole are universally stupid people, they would never ever read the official crime statistics published or encourage anyone to do so and instead just use speculation, rumors, or other such nonsense as sources, lol.Here’s the official crime statistic: http://bra.se/bra/brott–statistik/mord-och-drap.htmlThe murder count in Sweden in 2012 was 68, which comes to a murder rate of 0.71 per 100,000 for 2012, which is lower than all 50 US states, almost every country on the entire planet, and one of the very lowest murder rates in Sweden history!So Sweden has now achieved an unthinkable astronomically low murder rate of 0.71!

What a disappointment for the Nazis/atheists, Sweden’s murder rate in 2012 (with more Muslim immigration) is even lower than it was in 2011, one of the very very very lowest murder rates in all of Sweden history.

It’s really almost unthinkable that any country could have a murder rate this low.

To put things into perspective, let’s look at number of murders in US states with population sizes closest to Sweden’s 9.6 million population (Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina) since the murder rate is in proportion to the population size:
– Georgia had more than 550 murders in 2011
– Michigan had more than 600 murders in 2011
– North Carolina had more than 500 murders in 2011

Source: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-4

So this means that the US state with the lowest murder count and population size closest to Sweden (North Carolina) had nearly 100 more murders in 1 year than Sweden did in 5 years.

Sweden’s murder count in 5 years (2008-2012) would be 414, where as North Carolina’s murder count is above 500 in just 1 year.

The murder count in Sweden in 2012 was 68. You’ll have to go all the way back to maybe the 1960s or 1970s to find Sweden murder rates this low, lol.

I thought there was more crime in Sweden like the fools (atheists) said? If crime is up and there’s much more violence, wouldn’t the murder count and murder rate go up dramatically and be higher than at least a few US states? So where’s all the ‘crime’ that the fools (atheists) are referring to?

Not only is the murder rate lower, the murder count is lower than ever as well.

Apparently there’s more ‘crime’ and violence in Sweden, but Sweden is safer than all 50 US states, LOL (the US state with the lowest murder rate in 2011 had a murder rate of 1.2 per 100,000).

Well I guess I can’t blame atheists for being misled, they are gullible people who never read official crime statistics published, just garbage on blog sites.

I’m still waiting for the fools (atheists) to justify their lies about there being so much more crime in Sweden now with more Muslim immigration, I guess they can’t. All they have are lies arising from their low-life atheist mouth.

What will the fools (atheists) come up with next since the official crime statistics published debunks their lies?

When you see an atheist know that this person is  a liar and a racist don’t trust them, they have already misled the world with their lies.

Atheists take pleasure and rejoice in telling lies, it’s something fun and enjoyable for them.

No one really knows how it’s possible for any group of people to tell this many lies.

BTW: I’m not a Muslim and never have been at any time in my life (and never will be), I’m not from the Middle-East, Asia, Africa, or Europe. Initially I was on the same anti-Islam bandwagon that many are on right now (and said lots of anti-Islamic things) up until around 2011 when I realized it was just a waste of time and energy. What’s the point in focusing lots of time and energy on ending just Muslim-related crime (non-violent rapes with no injuries) alone, helping rebuild Muslim countries, trying to make life better for Muslims alone, and helping out Muslim countries alone? I don’t get it.

Since 9/11 there was more than 120,000 non-Muslim killings in the US (from 2002-2012), so what would happen if we focused our time and energy on helping out non-Muslims instead?

So the very worst thing that can happen to the Nazi White Nationalist movement in Sweden is a 0% Muslim population and lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants, this would ruin everything for them wouldn’t it?

They should deport/ban Muslim immigrants and prevent all that ‘crime’ in Sweden (that doesn’t show up in their murder rates, lol), then bring in lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants, if this time with non-Muslim immigrants there really is more actual crime, what will Nazi Swedes do (their dream easy target is gone)?

There’s more crime, but the murder rate in 2012 (latest data) is one of the lowest in Sweden history, lower than all 50 US States (meaning there’s not even 1 US state that has a lower murder rate), and lower than almost every single country in all of the entire world, lol.

All that the liars/atheists can do is discourage people from reading the official crime statistics published and avoid mentioning the murder rate at all cost, lol.

What a joke, atheists are the clowns of the world, the biggest joke that exists.

Don’t trust an atheist, they are always full of lies.

UPDATE: After much discussion I’ve determined the actual cause of the reported rape rate in Sweden being high.

Here’s my hypothesis as to why Sweden’s reported rape rate is so high:
– Sweden’s new modified rape laws in 2005 made it so that the way rapes are counted is intentionally inflated
– The rate of reporting rapes in Sweden is very high
– Many reported rapes in Sweden are false reports caused by the extreme racism there

The evidence to support this hypothesis:
– An excerpt from this BBC News article demonstrates how laughable Sweden’s new rape laws are:

“In Sweden there has been this ambition explicitly to record every case of sexual violence separately, to make it visible in the statistics,” she says.

“So, for instance, when a woman comes to the police and she says my husband or my fiance raped me almost every day during the last year, the police have to record each of these events, which might be more than 300 events. In many other countries it would just be one record – one victim, one type of crime, one record.” – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19592372

So this means that 1 report from 1 woman in Sweden could count as 300 or more “rapes” in their rape statistics, depending on how many times the victim claims they were “raped”.

In 2009 according to the Sweden Democrats there were only 253 rape cases (the number of rape cases would tell us the number of rapes if Sweden would’ve had regular rape counting laws), meaning that Sweden’s reported rape rate would only be around 2.7 per 100,000 if they had normal rape counting laws (which is more than 94% lower than the current rate that appears in their rape statistics).

- All of the objective crime statistics in Sweden that are difficult to falsely report like the murder rate and car thefts have decreased or remained constant

- Sweden’s murder rate in 2011 with more Muslim immigration has decreased to 0.86, it’s the lowest murder rate in decades for Sweden and one of the lowest in all of Sweden history, so Sweden’s murder rate is lower than all 50 US states in 2011 and almost every country in the entire world.  The murder rate in Sweden was much higher in the 1990s when there was much less Muslim immigration. From the murder rate we know that the type of “rapes” and “crime” in Sweden must not be lethal (Source: http://www.bra.se/bra/brott–statistik/mord-och-drap.html)

-  The reported number of homicides for Sweden in 2009 was 232, but the actual number was 92! So this means the actual homicide rate was more than 60% lower than the reported homicide rate. Over 100 of the reported homicides in Sweden in 2009 weren’t even about homicides, lol, can you believe that Swedes would stoop this low as to attempting to falsely report murders? (Source: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-12-006/EN/KS-SF-12-006-EN.PDF)

If people are willing to falsely report murders obviously they would be willing to falsely report a rape.

For a car theft how are you going to falsely report it? Are you going to make a up a non-existent license plate or hide your car? It’s difficult to falsely report a car theft.

For a homicide how are you going to falsely report it? Claim someone got killed even if they’re alive? It’s difficult to falsely report a homicide. Although you can falsely convict someone of murder.

But for a rape how are you going to falsely report it? Well it’s easy, even if there’s no DNA evidence or injuries in the case you can still win. Anyone can just make up a story about how they were raped, it’s arguably the very very easiest crime to falsely report.

- The main sign of a false rape report is no injuries and no DNA evidence. No injuries tells us that very little to no force was used and no DNA evidence tells us that there was no actual intercourse. So in cases like these you would just have to rely upon who you believe, the accused or the accuser. If there was more violence in Sweden we would expect the murder rate to increase, not decrease, so the murder rate is a real big blow to the Nazi movement in Sweden.

- Falsely reporting a rape is extremely easy, falsely reporting a homicide is extremely difficult, and the reported rape rate is the only crime statistic that’s radically changed in Sweden

- We know from history that in extremely racist societies falsely reporting rapes was common, here’s an example of one in Sweden:

“The [Swedish] woman later recanted her story about the alleged rape when she learned that a surveillance camera mounted in the taxi had recorded the couple leaving the vehicle without paying” – http://www.thelocal.se/14626/20080929/

- The murder rate isn’t calculated by the number of reports like how the reported rape rate is, it’s calculated by objective deaths, so the murder rate is a very objective statistic that’s difficult to distort and skew

- There were over 5,940 reported rapes in Sweden in 2009, but the Sweden Democrats talked about 114 out of 253 cases, 253 cases is more than 95% lower than the total number of reported rapes in Sweden, I’m guessing the number of cases is much lower because the “reported number” counts each alleged event (Source: http://www.thelocal.se/28580/20100825/#.UMR9MFVkyAg)

- According to Swedish journalist Ingrid Carlqvist “Most [Sweden] rape complaints are false. I base my conclusions on the hundreds of preliminary investigations and verdicts I’ve reviewed in my 30 years as a journalist” (Source: http://rixstep.com/2/1/20110701,00.shtml)

- Since the reported rape rate relies upon a country’s rape laws, the rate of reporting rapes, and since it’s extremely easy to falsely report a rape the reported rape rate is the very least objective of all crime statistics and gives us no objective data as to what’s occurring

Conclusion:
– The murder rate is really embarrassing so the Nazis/Swedes avoid mentioning it all costs
– Not being able to falsely report a murder like a rape must really pain the Nazi movement in Sweden
– Swedes are disgusting extremely racist people
There’s no way Swedes and other racists are going to encourage people to look at the official statistics and reports published, they’re only going to encourage people to look at  propaganda Nazi articles and YouTube videos
– The basic argument of the Nazis/Swedes and anyone who supports them is that “crime is up in Sweden except in every objective crime statistic that’s difficult to falsely report and distort”
– All that’s changed in Sweden is Sweden’s rape laws and the rate of reporting rape, this is why the murder rate has remained constant (actually lower now) in Sweden

If Swedes really believe that Muslim immigration is their problem (with a murder rate lower than all US states) then here’s what I suggest they do:
– Deport/ban all Muslim immigrants
– After all the Muslims are gone, bring in lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants
– If there’s more actual crime in Sweden (you know in objective crime statistics) with non-white non-Muslim immigrants, without a target as easy as the Muslims what will Nazi Swedes do?

I would encourage Sweden to deport all existing Muslim immigrants and ban all Muslim immigration, if this does not occur then I would suggest that any Muslim immigrant living in Sweden just voluntarily leave Sweden. I would also suggest that non-white non-Muslims go live in Sweden.

It would be a great experiment to see what would happen in Sweden with a 0% Muslim population and lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants. My guess is that then it wouldn’t matter if the murder rate was 10 times or 20 times higher in Sweden, it wouldn’t be international news or anything because non-Muslim immigrants are much harder targets.

Some other things to note:
– The worst rapist in Sweden was a White Swede, Thomas Quick, who allegedly rape and murdered 30 men
– New Zealand doesn’t have Sweden’s unique rape laws, so NZ’s reported rape rate is probably more real than Sweden’s, in NZ they have rape-murders like Jason Frandi, a White New Zealander who raped and murdered a tourist
– The European countries with the highest murder rates, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia have the least non-white immigration, lowest percentage of Muslims in Europe, and purest European stock. I’ve asked the people who complain about the supposed “Problem of Islam” in Europe as to why they don’t make websites or YouTube videos to help out Lithuanians, Latvians, and Estonians, but none of them have ever answered the question.
– Anyone who speaks to a Swede realizes how dumb and gullible they are, they don’t even know anything about their own country’s crime statistics
– Multiple studies and experiments have shown that White males are reported less often for all crime in general
– Since White males are reported less often for rape, if White males were reported as often as others at least 80% of the reported rapists in Sweden should be White males, this would be more consistent with the murder rate in Sweden
– If you report a White male for rape and there’s no injuries, you don’t have video camera evidence, 20 witnesses, or anything like that, and it’s not a child rape or drug rape then the jury will most likely just say “it’s no big deal, charges dropped”, you’ll just have to wait for the White male to go on to kill or seriously injure someone to get a conviction
– Society should really move towards opposing all rape in general regardless of who’s doing it

What a shame it is for the Nazi movement in Sweden that you can’t falsely report a murder like a rape

CASE CLOSED.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Since I’ve already completely embarrassed Nazi Swedes I guess I’ll embarrass some Nazi Norwegians.

The media in Norway and Sweden is controlled in a similar way that the media is controlled in many Islamic countries, so I suppose it’s not entirely their fault that they are so clueless about everything.

I’m sure you’ve probably heard the supposed claim that “ALL Assault rapes in 2010 in Norway come from Muslims or non-Western immigrants” or something like this on lots of articles and YouTube videos on the Internet.

It all sounds convincing up until you read the official Oslo police report published by the Norwegian police department:
Assault rape only comprises 6 cases, however, and the same perpetrator was responsible for two of these (there were 5 unique suspects/persons seen in 6 reports).In 4 of the six reports (3 unique men) the perpetrator was from the Middle-East, in one assault rape the man was from Africa, and in another, from Asia. Claims that all assault rapes are committed by foreigners are thus supported by these figures, although the basis for the claims is small and the selection is special

So all the articles and videos that use the term “ALL” are referring to 6 out of 6 cases.

A sum total of 6 assault rape cases in a population of 4.6 million comes to rate of 0.13 which matches into Norway’s extremely low murder rate of 0.6 (per 100,000).

But this isn’t the whole story, read on:
“If you extend the material to cover the 16 assault rape cases in which the person is unidentified, but where a description has been provided by the victim,another picture emerges: 8 of the perpetrators were of African/dark-skinned appearance, 5 were western/fair-haired/Nordic and 4 looked Asian.”

So counting assault rapes where the perpetrator was unidentified as well, it comes to a sum total of 22 cases (3 Middle-Easterners, 5 Asians, 9 Africans, and 5 Nordics).

Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/76695373/Excerpt-From-Oslo-Police-District-Report-on-Rape
Original Document: https://www.politi.no/oslo/aktuelt/nyhetsarkiv/2011_05/Nyhet_9976.xml

So the articles and videos claiming that “all assault rapes in Norway in 2010 come from non-Western immigrants” should be renamed to:
“In a sum total of 6 assault rape cases where the Norwegian police identified the perpetrator, all of them were non-Western, in the 16 assault rape cases where the perpetrator was unidentified by the Norwegian police 100% of them were non-Middle Eastern and 5 of them were Nordic. Norway’s murder rate has decreased and is lower than even Sweden’s in 2010, but that’s not worth mentioning since you can’t falsely report a murder like a rape.”

The main strategies the misleading videos and articles use are:
– Not mention the number of cases they’re referring to (6 out of 6 cases)
– Not mention the other cases where the Norwegian police conveniently did not identify the perpetrator (all 16 of them happened to be non-Middle-Easterners, lol)
– Not mention the murder rate in Norway in 2010 (0.6)

A sum total of 6 assault rape cases in a population of nearly 5 million is extremely low beyond imagination. We can point out lots of cities with populations of 100,000 or less with more than 6 assault rapes.

Norway’s murder rate in 2010 is 0.6, lower than all 50 US states and every single country in the entire world except for around 5-7 countries. There’s no way the Nazi atheists are going to encourage people to read the official statistics and reports, and the Nazi atheists will definitely avoid mentioning the murder rate at all cost.

A delusional atheist even told me that the official statistics were wrong, only what he saw on YouTube videos and blog sites was true. How can anyone be this gullible?

It would just be better for society if all European countries had banned and deported JUST Muslim immigrants. Muslims are just making things easier for the Nazis by being an easy target. All Muslims JUST GO HOME, leave Europe now! Non-white non-Muslims go live in Europe.

The best way for Swedes, Norwegians, Danes, and other atheist/racist countries to learn their lesson about telling lies would be if they just banned and deported all Muslim immigrants from Europe and then brought in lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants. They shouldn’t even allow Muslims to visit these countries. A 0% Muslim population and lots of non-Muslim immigrants would severely damage the Nazi/atheist movement, their easy dream target would be gone.

So I support the people who want to ban/deport Muslims from any and every country. The Muslims are just distracting people away from what’s really going on.

Since Sweden, Denmark, and Norway have relatively low population sizes this means if their murder count goes up slightly the murder rate would really go up (yet they still all remain lower than all 50 US states).

So what would European countries do if they had a 0% Muslim population and lots of non-Muslim immigrants with a murder rate that’s 10 or 20 times higher than their current murder rates?

On another note the one who actually killed 77 people in Norway was the White non-Muslim Norwegian Breivik. The liberal atheist media was severely disappointed when they found out that the “terrorist” was not an Islamic terrorist but instead a White non-Muslim. As soon as they found out that it was a White non-Muslim it turned into a non-event after like 2 days and no one cared. Muslim terrorist attacks that kill far less than 77 people remain international news for years and years.

There are lots of web sites and things like that dedicated to ending the supposed “Muslim crime epidemic” in Europe (just non-violent rapes with no injuries). Are these people just trying to end Muslim crime and terrorism alone? What about non-Muslim killings and crime?

The countries in Europe with the highest murder rates (Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania) have the least non-white immigration, lowest percentage of Muslims, and purest European stock. I’ve repeatedly asked the same people who are attempting to end JUST Muslim crime alone (non-violent rapes with no injuries obviously the result of modified rape laws , the rate of reporting rapes going up, and false reports) why they don’t try to end all the crime in those countries, but still no one answered the question.

Wouldn’t it be great if Latvia, Lithuania,  and Estonia had murder rates as low as Norway’s and Sweden’s?

Just look at how primitive Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia are. These countries have accomplished almost nothing. The only good thing I can say about one of these countries (Lithuania) is Phoebus Levene.

Why can’t things be a big deal regardless of if a Muslim or non-Muslim did it? If all the people who did killings all around the world were Muslim we could get the entire world to oppose what they do.

I had a friend from Estonia, his parents were murdered when he was 5 years old, is it not a big deal because non-Muslims did it? I had another friend who’s Father was murdered and killed, is it not a big deal because non-Muslims did it?

Look at all the opposition towards the supposed Muslim crime in Europe (just the reported rape rate increasing after countries modified rape laws and the murder rate decreasing or remaining extremely low). Just imagine what the world would be like if only Muslims did crime, we could get the entire world to oppose what they were doing.

What a shame.

Sweden Muslim population: 2% (149,000 total)
Sweden 2008 rape per capita rate per 100,000: 46.6 (4,269 total rapes)

New Zealand Muslim population: 0.9% (37,000 total)
New Zealand 2008 rape per capita rate per 100,000: 31.3 (1,314 total rapes)

Greece Muslim population: 3% (310,000 total)
Greece 2008 rape per capita rate per 100,000: 2.0 (214 total rapes)

Switzerland Muslim population: 4.3% (323,000 total)
Switzerland 2008 rape per capita rate per 100,000: 8.6 (648 total rapes)

The much more religious countries like Greece and Switzerland some how have less rape per capita rates and rape total counts despite having much higher Muslim populations than the more atheistic countries like Sweden and New Zealand. New Zealanders, similar to Swedes are very racist and also blame all their problems on immigrants.

In New Zealand, a celebrated atheist country, throwing hamburger meat at Asians is normal and common. Basically 100% of male Asians who have lived in New Zealand have experienced racism at least once. The rape in New Zealand cannot be blamed on Arabs or Muslims so atheist New Zealanders will probably blame the rape on the hated immigrant group there, Asians.

New Zealand and Sweden (and nearly every other country with a high atheist population) have very high levels of female promiscuity. In New Zealand it’s just common to run into women who have slept with more than 50 guys. The average female in New Zealand has slept with 20 guys.

Perhaps high levels of promiscuity or a high atheist population is what actually causes high rape rates and not Muslims. If Muslims are responsible for high rape rates, then how can countries with much higher Muslim populations than Sweden or New Zealand have much lower rape rates and counts?

In conclusion atheists have a tendency to rape. These people called “atheists” are the worst people you’ll ever meet, the most racist form of life. People have to realize what happens to a country when uncivilized atheists take over a country. Everywhere atheists go they cause rape and racism, then try to blame it all on the immigrant group.

244 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. servidor privado / Jul 24 2014 4:48 am

    It’s going to be end of mine day, however before ending I am reading this
    fantastic article to increase my know-how.

  2. mr brunns / Jun 30 2014 3:30 am

    Really you have no idea and your blatant racism is very obvious you mentioned one white rapist in New Zealand when if you had actually done some research you would have found that the majority of rapes in this country are actually perpetrated by a non white minority who make up 15% of the population followed closely by immigrant pacific islanders.

    And really everyone knows muslims are scum.
    So fuck off you Cock sucker.

  3. oxyfboprn@gmail.com / Jun 10 2014 7:31 am

    Best Place To Buy wholesale cheap Jaguars jerseys china

  4. itsnobody / Apr 28 2014 9:35 pm

    How sad…after all this time White people can’t even name one rape case for a White male that matches that criteria I listed, LOL!

    I’m pretty sure my estimate of 99.9% White males in the rape statistic (if they were reported as often) is accurate.

    Right now around 40-56% of the rapes in Sweden are from White males…but White males are reported most likely at least 10 times less often, which gives around 90% White males (if they were reported as often). But my estimate of 10 times less often is probably too low.

    On White TV Shows, movies, and White cartoon shows white male “non-violent non-child non-drug” rapes are just viewed as jokes…lol

    Anyone ever heard on the news “A White male looked at someone at work, and tapped them on the shoulder, it’s a brutal gruesome rape or harassment”…lol, what a joke.

    It’s really easy to falsely report a “non-violent rape”….all you have to do is call the cops and say something like “Someone grabbed me, they touched me, punched me in the stomach, slapped me in the face, and hand-raped me, but there somehow just wasn’t any objective injuries or DNA evidence involved”.

    Any female can easily falsely report a rape…if you falsely accuse a non-white male or Muslim in countries as racist as Sweden you can easily get a conviction, if you accuse a White male it’s going to be really hard to get a conviction.

    Conclusion: The White Western world doesn’t care about “non-violent non-child non-drug rapes” for White males.

  5. Smithf201 / Mar 29 2014 12:14 pm

    Very nice! acbddcbckc

  6. veterinary / Mar 29 2014 12:28 am

    Definitely believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason
    appeared to be on the net the simplest thing to be aware of.

    I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about
    worries that they just don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail
    upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side effect ,
    people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.
    Thanks

  7. itsnobody / Mar 9 2014 6:37 pm

    Face reality: It would be around 99.9% White males in the “non-violent non-child non-drug” rape statistic if White males were reported as often as others.

    I’m still waiting for just one fuckin White atheist to open up their low-life White mouth and name some White male non-violent, non-child, non-drug rapes, with only 1 witness, no video camera/picture evidence, that’s not a celebrity or someone special, and where the person didn’t admit to it that became a big deal in the White Western media.

    Go ahead and name some Whiteys.

    We can see what Westerners think of women. If they consider such “rapes” to be a big deal for White males they should be able to name like at least 10 or so since polls show that it’s very common, they can’t even name one case LOL!

    I’ve seen with my own eyes White males raping women in public lol, it’s unreported because they know they can’t get a conviction.

    In Western countries women are viewed as like nothing. White male “non-violent non-child non-drug rapes” are viewed as like a joke and White Westerners always defend other White males accused.

    In most Western countries it’s basically impossible to get a conviction for a White male non-violent non-child non-drug rape with only 1 witness, unless they admit to it or you have video camera or picture evidence, lol.

    Here’s one non-violent rape case with a White male – http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/10/15/teen-rape-victim-maryville/. Daisy was raped, dropped off half-naked by a White male, he got 0 years in jail and just community service. The White Western town came out to defend and protect the White male and terrorize the victim for accusing him of rape. The only reason it was known to be true is because he admitted to doing it, it was a child rape, and because there were so many witnesses.

    In most Western countries women are really afraid of accusing people of rape even if it is true because the whole town might turn on them and it would be extremely difficult to get a conviction.

    Just imagine if a non-white or Muslim were accused of doing the exact same thing, they wouldn’t be getting 0 years and just community service. They might get 55 years lol.

    On White movies like American Reunion, American Pie, Hangover etc… “non-violent non-child non-drug” rapes are viewed as a joke.

    In that movie American Reunion a White male stripped off clothes from females at a beach, it was viewed as a joke “haha” to other Whites, that’s what they think of it. If it had been a non-white or Muslim they would say “that’s so brutal and gruesome and blah blah”.

    LOL!

    White Westerners view women as virtually nothing, White males are lucky that other White Westerners defend and protect White males so they can freely rape many women without getting convicted.

    So we know this whole thing has nothing to do with the actual alleged act (“the non-violent non-child non-drug rape”) but with race and ethnicity.

    It’s too bad that White people can’t help out their own White kind!

    Come on Whiteys, go ahead and name some “non-violent non-child non-drug” rapes for White males that matched the criteria I listed, we can see what the White kind think of women.

    Many White male rape cases aren’t reported even with injuries lol, so my estimate of around 99.9% White males (if they were reported as often) is probably accurate.

  8. itsnobody / Feb 23 2014 2:11 pm

    Good luck atheists!

    I think I’m done posting on this article.

    Please perform one of these experiments on my behalf:
    – Experiment 1: A 0% Muslim population and a high non-white non-Muslim population
    – Experiment 2: A 0% non-white population

    Please do one of these experiments for me!

  9. joker quotes / Feb 23 2014 6:29 am

    What a information of un-ambiguity and preserveness of valuable knowledge concerning unexpected emotions.

  10. djBbws / Feb 19 2014 8:02 pm

    more lexapro or xanax for anxiety – how many 1mg xanax to overdose

  11. tkihxYZDRku / Jan 22 2014 12:11 am

    morea€¦ ambien cr zoloft – zolpidem generic ambien cr

  12. Anonymous / Dec 19 2013 8:18 am

    I wish a nasty Christmas to the atheists.

  13. itsnobody / Dec 14 2013 12:39 am

    I hope Sweden (and every Western country for that matter) takes their marching orders from me: Ban deport all existing and future Muslim immigrants

    It might sound harsh, but a 0% Muslim population and lots of non-white non-Muslims would ruin everything for the Nazi movement, and that’s my main motivation, ruining everything for the Nazi movement.

    Atheists think they’re smart, but they aren’t as smart as I am!

    They (SD and SVP, the Nazis) are purely left-wing on every single issue (fiscally and socially):

    Social issues:
    – Opposing Israel as opposed to supporting them
    – Supporting the belief in evolution as opposed to the creationist delusion
    – Supporting hate speech laws to prevent people from criticizing racists
    – Supporting the view that the US is an evil country, the enemy
    – Supporting Iran and Al-Queda

    Fiscal issues:
    – Supporting more regulations
    – Supporting socialist policies
    – Supporting a Karl Marx type government

    A Karl Marx style government would work to automatically prevent migration, immigration, hold non-whites down, and preserve a Whites-only type of society even without anti-immigration laws!

    Support the left-wing on every issue, support a Whites-only type of society!

    It’s the free market, free speech, free society, it’s a terrible thing for a Whites-only type of society, haha!

  14. Anonymous / Dec 3 2013 10:26 pm

    You are the most deluded and sick in the head individual I have ever listened to (Author) , you fucking stupid cunt, do you hear the absolute shit you write. Left wing nut jobs like yourself are controlling and running Europe into the ground, you are so deluded by your mind that you don’t see what is actually happening, by the time you do realise it will be to late, unless its what you want, which I think it is as you sound like a muslim. Fuck you scum ! I hope you die horribly !

    • itsnobody / Dec 13 2013 11:49 pm

      I’m not left-wing, I’m right-wing.

      You’re a disgusting left-wing socialist nutcase!

      No, I’m not a Muslim, never have been and never will be, I want them to deport/ban the existing and future Muslim immigrants from Europe and every Western country, right now immediately!

      This would ruin everything for the whole Nazi movement there, that’s my main motivation, so good luck, they can stop “non-violent rapes with no injuries” (since they can’t falsely report a car theft or homicide, lol).

      It might sound harsh, but that’s just what we need to ruin the Nazi movement, a 0% Muslim population in every Western country.

      If White males were reported more often for “non-violent rapes with no injuries” it would probably be 99% White males in the “non-violent rape with no injuries” crime statistic, lol.

      White males are probably reported 10-100 times less often for “non-violent rapes with no injuries” than Muslim males are, lol.

      Just imagine, Westerners have a hard time naming just one non-violent non-child non-drug non-celebrity/special person adult White male rape case with only 1 witness and no objective injuries that ever became a big deal in the Western media.

      Face the reality of the situation: White Western males view women as nothing and don’t consider “non-violent rapes with no injuries” a big deal for other White males.

      The only reason they consider it to be a big deal for “Muslims” and non-whites is because of racism and prejudice, nothing else.

      The truth hurts, stop living in your delusional fantasy world.

      If you disagree with anything said here feel free to open up your low-life left-wing socialist liberal atheist mouth and cite valid sources refuting these things.

      I cited all types of sources you stupid fuck.

      If White males were reported as often it would be 99% White males in the “non-violent rape with no injury” crime statistic, face reality you low-life left-wing Karl Marx loving dick

  15. Virtual finger / Dec 3 2013 8:40 am

    Lol, jonas pell you’re a fucking ignorant atheist. 

    According to the bullshit you wrote, the Ustashi who helped Hitler to exterminate minorities were devoted Christians. So let’s vet the facts !
    The Ustashi Josip Frank was born a Jews. 
    Ante Pavelic’s own wife, Mara Lovrencic, came from a family of assimilated Jews, and Dido Kvaternik, was related to Josip Frank. 
    The Frankists were very critical of political Catholicism and naturally attacked the First Croatian Catholic Congress held in 1900. Therefore they attracted many new Jewish such as Kornitzer , Wintherhalter , Hagenauer , Moskovic etc…
    If you seek deeper, you will find many other assimilated Jews (converted Jews or Jewish atheists) involved in the fights against the Orthodox Serbs and the other minorities. 
    The Simon Wiesenthal Center has estimated that at least 30,000 Jews (75% of the pre-war population), 29,000 Roma (97%) and 600,000 Serbs – or about one-third of the pre-war population – were murdered in the four years of the Independent State of Croatia’s existence. 
    Decades later , the Israeli government supported Croatia over the Serbs to pay homage to their fellow Frank, Pavelic and Kvaterniks.

    Where did you learn history ? In an atheist school ?

  16. Michael Hall / Nov 28 2013 4:05 pm

    What rubbish! I’m in Norway and there is the same thing happening in Oslo. The rapists ARE Muslim.

    • itsnobody / Dec 1 2013 9:55 pm

      Hey shithead,

      Everything cited here is correct and accurate, the one living in fantasy is you and your other Nazi atheist Norwegian friends.

      The reason why you’re unaware is because the Norwegian Nazi media controls information in Norway, isn’t that true?

      That’s why you’ve never read your own country’s crime reports, LOL!

      Why don’t you cite a source out of your low-life atheist mouth for?

      According to the official Oslo Norwegian police report the number of assault rapes was 6 LOL!

      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”
      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”
      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”
      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”
      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”
      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”
      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”
      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”
      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”
      That’s why the popular video cited says “where the perpetrator could be identified”

      Assault rape only comprises 6 cases, however, and the same perpetrator was responsible for two of these (there were 5 unique suspects/persons seen in 6 reports).In 4 of the six reports (3 unique men) the perpetrator was from the Middle-East, in one assault rape the man was from Africa, and in another, from Asia. Claims that all assault rapes are committed by foreigners are thus supported by these figures, although the basis for the claims is small and the selection is special

      ALL means 6 out of 6 cases, lol.

      6 cases in a population of 4.8 million is an extremely low assault rape rate beyond imagination (0.125 per 100,000).

      6 cases is so extraordinarily low that it’s unimaginable that any country with a population of nearly 5 million could have only 6 assault rape cases.

      Lets look at what the official police report says about the claim “where the perpetrator could be identified”:
      “If you extend the material to cover the 16 assault rape cases in which the person is unidentified, but where a description has been provided by the victim,another picture emerges: 8 of the perpetrators were of African/dark-skinned appearance, 5 were western/fair-haired/Nordic and 4 looked Asian.”

      Some how by magic in the 16 assault rapes where the perpetrator was unidentified 100% are non-Middle Eastern, what a big magic coincidence.

      So 3 out of 22 were Middle Eastern.

      I know why they only identified the Middle-Easterners, because if they put “all assault rapes from non-Muslim Asian-looking males” no one would care or “all assault rapes from non-Muslim African males” no one would care, or “all assault rapes from Nordic males” then DEFINITELY no one would care, but “3 out of 22 assault rapes from Muslim Middle Easterners” well then everyone would care.

      Translation: http://www.scribd.com/doc/76695373/Excerpt-From-Oslo-Police-District-Report-on-Rape
      Original Document: https://www.politi.no/oslo/aktuelt/nyhetsarkiv/2011_05/Nyhet_9976.xml (this is from the official Norwegian police web site, not blog sites or whatever)

      6 cases in a population of 4.8 million is an extremely low assault rape rate beyond imagination (0.125 per 100,000).

      I’m still waiting for an answer as to why Norway’s murder rate is so extremely low as well (0.6 per 100,000), which is lower than every country’s murder rate in the entire world (except for like 3) and all 50 US states, LOL.

      Answer the fuckin question for once in that low-life atheist life of yours just the answer the question.

      Apparently what’s going on is “they’re only doing non-violent rapes with no injuries and nothing else difficult to falsely report”

      I’m 100% certain that if Europeans were reported more often it would be like 90%-99% White males in the reported rape statistic. If you don’t believe me just watch that show “To Catch a Predator”, you’ll see a bunch of White males in prestigious positions who ordinarily would never be reported, the only reason they are is because of the video camera evidence and other objective evidence. If they were reported (without the video camera and other objective evidence), still they would never be convicted.

      Well anyway good luck with banning and deporting the Muslim immigrants, you can stop those “non-violent rapes with no injuries”, it’s just what I want them to do, gain a 0% Muslim population and lots of non-white non-Muslim immigrants.

      I’m going to try to get Muslims banned in the US, it doesn’t really bother me if there’s a 0% Muslim population in the US, I don’t personally know many or interact with them. I think it’s better for society if they are banned because they are making things too easy for the Nazis.

      I think every Western country should ban and deport the Muslims, it would ruin everything for the Nazi movement, and you Nazis know it too.

      In conclusion, you are a gullible disgusting subhuman atheist and should be ashamed that a White non-Muslim killed 77 people in Norway, you deserved to be laughed at for being gullible.

      I feel bad for destroying a gullible disgusting subhuman Norwegian like you because everything here cited is a 100% accurate.

      If you disagree with anything said here then feel free to cite valid sources refuting it, you fools (atheists) don’t have anything.

      They never have and NEVER will cite any valid source, just nonsense garbage blog sites and/or YouTube videos.

      In conclusion: Atheists are gullible disgusting subhuman beings, the lowest of the low, and deserve to be laughed at.

      Fuck not some, but rather all atheists.

      I win. CASE CLOSED.

  17. Atheists are useful idiots / Oct 30 2013 12:29 am

    @ jonas pell 

    I will not come back to all the lies you put in my mouth , there are too many ; I just don’t want let you believe that you impress me with your superficial knowledge of history that makes you feel so superior. 

    “Then lets move to subtopic of the way not just the Nazis, but the [*] honorable German army murdering Red POWs and Russians suspected of partisan. I can also add that for the most part, a German soldier could murder any Russian for any reason and he would go unpunished.

     

    Glad to see that you white trash publicly admit your sympathy for the “honorable German army”. I’m really not surprised to read how much white atheists are impressed by nazi uniforms but most of the time one can only hear such statements in private conversations. 
    ( See , I did not put words in your mouth instead I’ve been an atheist for two seconds : I deleted [*] just one word the way you all atheists like to fake the religious quotes, etc…) 

     In response to this crime against humanity, the vermin here remarked that since Stalin was a bastard too, murdering Red POWs was okay since they were not only Red Army men, but atheists, and nothing that you religious Nazis here hate more than people who don’t share your self righteous delusions.

     

    Of course, I never said that, I meant to explain that “war crimes” -crime against humanity is a quite different matter- is a specific term which is defined by the Geneva conventions that the USSR opposed. The treaty is a bilateral commitment with reciprocal rights and duties. But it seems that your superior knowledge of history made you omit many details. 
    So the supposedly very humanistic atheist Soviets were then treated the same way they intended and finally treated German soldiers… Else what’s the point to sign such treaty ?
    But the nazis treated more badly the thousands French black soldiers they met during the invasion of France in 1940 whereas France signed the Geneva conventions. Even the French Jewish soldiers were not executed systematically ; for the black soldiers , there was just no prisoner camp, no disgusting food, no cold cell …just a bullet shot at point-blank. White French officers who protested were often simply executed too. 
    This war crime was evidently inspired by scientific racism teachings dear to anticlerical atheists.
    But as you “honestly” read that I’m a blond Catholic you certainly will not understand my hatred for the scientific racism and its implication in the European consciousness. It simpler for you to put nasty words in my mouth and call me names. Just like in the Soviet Show trials…

     
    One scumbag went even further and blamed the hapless Russian POWs, many of whom were Jews, for what their Nazi murderers did to the Jews. So the Red POWs are not only responsible for Stalin’s but Hitler’s crimes? That is truly sick. The mass murder of the Jews didn’t start until after Barbarossa began anyways. So how can a Russian POW, many who were also Jews, be held accountable for any crimes that their Nazi tormentors or even the Reds committed previously? 

     

    No Pinocchio , I was talking about the implications of the German-Soviet pact in the preparation of the Holocaust and the other eugenics measures. Also I posted some of Stalin concessions on race issues especially against the Jews that you intentionally and thoroughly ignored ; the commies were then undoubtedly aware that this war was a unique one : an extermination war. At this time , Hitler was crystal clear about the issues of this war. 
    I was saying that the Red Army -which had many Jewish soldiers in its ranks- is at least complicit in the massacres perpetrated against civilians and military prisoners in Central Europe before Barbarossa, and complicit in the consolidation of the nazis dominance and prestige by providing the oil they desperately needed. 
        
    – According to Wikipedia :
    Germany and the Soviet Union entered an intricate trade pact on February 11, 1940, that was over four times larger than the one the two countries had signed in August 1939.[195] The trade pact helped Germany to surmount a British blockade of Germany.[195] In the first year, Germany received one million tons of cereals, half a million tons of wheat, 900,000 tons of oil, 100,000 tons of cotton, 500,000 tons of phosphates and considerable amounts of other vital raw materials, along with the transit of one million tons of soybeans from Manchuria.[citation needed] These and other supplies were being transported through Soviet and occupied Polish territories.[195] The Soviets were to receive a naval cruiser, the plans to the battleship Bismarck, heavy naval guns, other naval gear and thirty of Germany’s latest warplanes, including the Me-109 and Me-110 fighters and Ju-88 bomber.[195] The Soviets would also receive oil and electric equipment, locomotives, turbines, generators, diesel engines, ships, machine tools and samples of Germany artillery, tanks, explosives, chemical-warfare equipment and other items.[195]
    The Soviets also helped Germany to avoid British naval blockades by providing a submarine base, Basis Nord, in the northern Soviet Union near Murmansk.[185] This also provided a refueling and maintenance location, and a takeoff point for raids and attacks on shipping.[185] In addition, the Soviets provided Germany with access to the Northern Sea Route for both cargo ships and raiders (though only the commerce raider Komet used the route before the German invasion), which forced Britain to protect sea lanes in both the Atlantic and the Pacific.[196]
       
    It is easy to guess how inestimable the atheist communists support was in Blitzkrieg and what was the ripple effects in Hitler’s future eugenics policy who then met less and less obstacles as he was the master of Europe.  
    Yes , the Soviets must be held accountable for Hitler’s victories in Europe until 1941 since they remained faithful to the avowed racist and eugenics Germany until the pact was broken by Hitler. 

    The atheists are the useful idiots of the nazis. 

     
    Then I heard the classic Nazi whine about what the Russians did to the German people in 1945 and later. Well, if the Reds killed just one German for every Russian murdered previously by the Nazis, East Germany would be a ghost country. 

     

    Once again you morally challenged atheist twisted my thoughts. As I first told you , the German-Russian relationship is dog eat dog. I don’t really care about what they did to one another. I was saying that not only the Red Army raped German women by thousands but they also raped Jewish women they supposedly freed from death camps , Polish and Russian women detained in German camps.   

     «THE Red Army’s orgy of rape in the dying days of Nazi Germany was conducted on a much greater scale than previously suspected, according to a new book by the military historian Anthony Beevor.
    Beevor, the author of the best-selling Stalingrad, says advancing Soviet troops raped large numbers of Russian and Polish women held in concentration camps, as well as millions of Germans.
    The extent of the Red Army’s indiscipline and depravity emerged as the author studied Soviet archives for his forthcoming book Berlin, to be published in April by Viking.
    Beevor – who was educated at Sandhurst and served in the 11th Hussars (Prince Albert’s Own), an elite cavalry regiment – says details of the Soviet soldiers’ behaviour have forced him to revise his view of human nature.
    “Having always in the past slightly pooh-poohed the idea that most men are potential rapists, I had to come to the conclusion that if there is a lack of army discipline, most men with a weapon, dehumanised by living through two or three years of war, do become potential rapists,” he told The Bookseller.
    [...]
    But he admits that he was “shaken to the core” to discover that Russian and Polish women and girls liberated from concentration camps were also violated.
    “That completely undermined the notion that the soldiers were using rape as a form of revenge against the Germans,” he said.
    “By the time the Russians reached Berlin, soldiers were regarding women almost as carnal booty; they felt because they were liberating Europe they could behave as they pleased. That is very frightening, because one starts to realise that civilisation is terribly superficial and the facade can be stripped away in a very short time.” »   
     

     

    Of course, if the British Royal Army have raped thousands of Jewish women held in camps , no doubt that you would have say that this cruelty had been inspired by traditional Christian antisemitism. But when atheist soldiers rape women who only have skin and bones, you only reply “bad luck , it’s human nature”. 

    But , your recurrent lousy argument is :

    “Second, if Hitler was so into killing Catholics, why didn’t he just annihilate the whole Vatican when his forces occupied Rome?

     

    Do you think Stalin was a Shintoist ?
    Hitler’s admirals predicted that if the nazi troops have attacked the Vatican (this event could evidently not be kept quiet the same way he massacred priests in central Europe and disfranchised the Christians in French Lorraine ) there was a good chance that some other neutral countries (especially in Latin America) would have not admit such aggression at a time the Kriegsmarine desperately needed naval stations in the Atlantic ocean to supply and repair U-boot ; only a Christian-hater like you can’t understand this basic strategical  preoccupations. 
    It’s pure logic, nothing to do with religion. It would have been a reasonable strategical choice for any country. 
    At this time , the US and Britain tried as well to seduce neutral countries or at least tried to give them good reasons not to be involved in this war. Even the Soviets signed a non-aggression pact with Japan to make sure the USSR would not have to fight on two fronts. This pact lasted until July 1945. Do you conclude that Stalin was a Shintoist ? If Japan attacked the Soviets instead of Pearl Harbor like the nazis expected , there are good reasons to believe that the Soviet regime would have been in a nasty mess and never could defend Stalingrad and Moscow. Strategy , nothing more than strategy …
    Hitler also never invaded Switzerland, Sweden whereas he could easily conquer those countries, but he knew well his army could be bogged down in another quagmire and waste time and efforts in useless battles. 
    When Stalin freed the orthodox clerics and ceased religious persecutions nationwide, it was also part of a cynical seduction game to unite the country against the Germans not the beginning of a massive religious conversion. 

    But you’re too naive to believe that atheists can be hypocrite , aren’t you ?

  18. jonas pell / Oct 27 2013 11:00 pm

    Let me come back and deliver one more broadside to sink the decrepit boat here. I am serious when I state that I am morally and intellectually superior to the blog author and his insipid, degenerate crew. But that is really comparing myself to the dregs of humanity, so it is nothing for me to brag about, but it is still a fact.

    Let me put all the dishonest, hateful nonsense spewed here into proportion. First off, maybe some atheists did lie about Swedish rape stats. But the blog author, with the same mentality of a racist Nazi, has implicated EVERY ATHEIST in the world as an accessory to this “crime”. Yet the only evidence the scumbag has that the “rape by Muslims” meme perpetrators are atheists is that it happened in Sweden. No personal histories or even names of the alleged culprits are even brought out as evidence, yet this scumbag knows without a doubt that the perps are atheists. He also indicts every Swede in every racist crime ever committed there, as if they all acted as one person. That is the classic thinking of a racist bigot: all the people he hates are in a horde without a mind and they all act and think alike.Yet the same scumbag fails to inform us, since he is essentially a liar, that most of the anti-Muslims in the USA are not atheists; like Robert Spencer or Pam Geller. Since they are not atheists, their lies and hype go unremarked here.

    Then let’s get back to what really got my goat here: the contemptible “Nazis were killing Catholics” lie. Sure some Catholic clergy were killed by the Nazis, but as a whole, if any sort of non Jewish clergy steered clear of the Nazi occupation forces and complied with their demands, they were left alone. The lone exception was Poland where the Nazis literally killed any Pole who could be leader or had any sort of education, which included their mostly Catholic clergy. Yet John Paul was not killed in WW ll and he was a Polish priest in Nazi occupied Poland. Liars and twits use anecdotes, while honest people and real historians use metrics. These stats are not exact, but 99% of the Jews, Communists and gypsies the Nazi encountered and knew about were apprehended and 90% of those were later killed, if not killed on the spot. For the Catholic clergy, about 0.5% of them were apprehended and about 50% of those later died in Nazi hands After all, Nazi controlled a Europe that was chock full of not only Catholics, but priests, nuns, monks, friars, prelates, bishops and lay employees of the Vatican. Italy alone could have filled a 1000 trainloads of Catholic clergy to Auschwitz if killing Catholics was a Nazi goal. Sure, one of the scumbags here reminded me that Hitler despised Christianity, which is a fact. But that is far different than mass murder of the clergy.

    Then lets move to subtopic of the way not just the Nazis, but the supposedly honorable German army murdering Red POWs and Russians suspected of partisan. I can also add that for the most part, a German soldier could murder any Russian for any reason and he would go unpunished. In response to this crime against humanity, the vermin here remarked that since Stalin was a bastard too, murdering Red POWs was okay since they were not only Red Army men, but atheists, and nothing that you religious Nazis here hate more than people who don’t share your self righteous delusions. One scumbag went even further and blamed the hapless Russian POWs, many of whom were Jews, for what their Nazi murderers did to the Jews. So the Red POWs are not only responsible for Stalin’s but Hitler’s crimes? That is truly sick. The mass murder of the Jews didn’t start until after Barbarossa began anyways. So how can a Russian POW, many who were also Jews, be held accountable for any crimes that their Nazi tormentors or even the Reds committed previously? Then I heard the classic Nazi whine about what the Russians did to the German people in 1945 and later. Well, if the Reds killed just one German for every Russian murdered previously by the Nazis, East Germany would be a ghost country.

    Finally, all I see here are crude RW bigots of the worse stripe, who demonize atheists in the exact same manner their Nazi brethren demonized Jews or the Communists demonized the bourgeoisie. To you sick fucks, the atheists are subhumans who should be murdered. That makes you quite simply, Nazis in my book, Lastly as a Jew I can honestly testify that I ran into plenty of Nazi like hate filled Catholic anti-semites in my life. People just like you, brutes, bullies, bigots and lowlifes.

    • @ jonas pell, the closet nazi. / Oct 27 2013 11:38 pm

       Lastly as a Jew I can honestly testify that I ran into plenty of Nazi like hate filled Catholic anti-semites in my life. People just like you, brutes, bullies, bigots and lowlifes.  

      Lol, I can say the same, you idiot, I’m not a White man.
      As a Black man , I can honestly testify that I ran into plenty of Nazi like hate filled atheist racists in my life. People just like you, brutes, bullies, bigots and lowlifes.
      So do you have a yellow star when you meet a nazi ? When I meet an atheist , he sees the color of my skin. No need to have a colored symbol on my shirt to see the hatred of people like you. In the racial theories, Blacks are less than Jews. 
      Also, Jewish atheists are absolutely not less racist than the other atheists and you proved it.
      I repeat that I’m not a catholic either. You didn’t read the comments, you just insult people.

      • @ jonas pell , the rude and dishonest atheist / Oct 28 2013 12:16 am

        You’re so racist that you couldn’t imagine that a Black man can speak about European history …and do not despise the Catholics. But the Catholics were far better to me and my family (who lives in Europe since decades) than the nicest atheist we met in spite of the fact that we are neither White, nor Catholics. ( I’m either not a Muslim…). 

    • @ jona pell who feels superior / Oct 28 2013 1:10 pm

      ” I am morally and intellectually superior to the blog author and his insipid, degenerate crew.”

      We’re not crew, I don’t know the author of this blog. We just probably share the same experience with atheists.

  19. Occupation of Poland by the atheist nazis / Oct 24 2013 5:39 pm

    @ Jonas Pell

    «The Nazi plan for Poland entailed the destruction of the Polish nation, which necessarily required attacking the Polish Church, particularly in those areas annexed to Germany.[19] Thousands of priests died in prisons and concentration camps; thousands of churches and monasteries were confiscated, closed or destroyed; and priceless works of religious art and sacred objects were lost forever. Church leaders were targeted as part of an overall effort to destroy Polish culture.
    [..]
    A large number of Polish priests were chosen for Nazi medical experiments. In November 1942, 20 were given phlegmons. 120 were used by Dr Schilling for malaria experiments between July 1942 and May 1944. Several Poles met their deaths with the “invalid trains” sent out from the camp, others were liquidated in the camp and given bogus death certificates. Some died of cruel punishment for misdemeanors – beaten to death or run to exhaustion. » 
    [...]
    The small Evangelical churches of Poland also suffered. All the Protestant clergy of the Cieszyn region of Silesia were arrested and sent to the death camps at Mauthausen, Buchenwald, Dachau and Oranienburg. Among the Protestant martyrs were Karol Kulisz, director of the Evangelical Church’s largest charitable organization, who died in Buchenwald in November 1939; Professor Edmund Bursche, a member of the Evangelical Faculty of Theology at the University of Warsaw, who died in the stone quarries of Mauthausen; and the 79-year-old Bishop of the Evangelical Church of the Augsburg Confession in Poland, Juliusz Bursche, who died in solitary confinement in Berlin.[citation needed

     

    Did you ever attend either university or school ?

    • jonas pell / Oct 25 2013 3:33 am

      Killing the Polish priests was merely part of the larger Nazi goal of killing just about anyone in Poland with more than a grammar school education. The Nazis killed postal clerks, grammar school teachers & university professors as well. They wanted to reduce the Polish people to serfdom. But as a rule, the Nazis didn’t go around killing people just because they were Catholics. They would have murdered a good third of the German people and Hitler himself if your lie was true. Let me see: Hitler was Catholic, Austria and Bavaria, his home country and the birthplace of Nazism are Catholic countries. The Croatian Ustashi, Romanian and Hungarian allies of the Nazis were all Catholics and they all committed heinous atrocities. Franco’s Spain was Catholic, and he sent his Blue Division to fight alongside the Nazis in their barbaric invasion of the USSR, Degrelle was Catholic and his pro Nazi Belgian forces were recruited mainly from the Catholic Walloons and became one of the best divisions in all of the Waffen SS. Petain’s Vichy government relied a lot on the Catholic church too.

      Finally the ultimate stake in the heart of your fake Nazis hated Catholic lie was that the Nazi forces occupied Rome from September 1943 to June 1944 but never once violated the sovereignty of the Vatican nation.

      Let me get back the ultra heinous and murderous Croatian Ustashi. They were led by monks and priests who actively participated in the mass murder of Serbs, Gypsies and Jews. They were one of the best most loyal client state of the NAZIS, Nor were they puppets, The Nazis never occupied Croatia but the Croatians were grateful to their allegedly Catholic Hating Nazi over-lords for freeing them from Serb and Bosnian domination in the old Yugoslavia. And as recently as the 1990s, the Polish pope, I forget his name, tried to canonize one of those vile Nazi collaborating Croatian priests. So even the precious Vatican was not Nazi-phobic. Don’t forget the Rat Lines after 1945 where the Church shepherded many Nazis to safety from war crimes tribunals after Germany fell. Also, the commander of the German Armies around Berlin in the last days of the War was Catholic, General Heinrici. Please spare yourself the embarrassing fable about how the noble Wehrmacht opposed the vile Nazis.The Wehrmacht killed or let die in horrible conditions over FOUR MILLION SOVIET POWs. As well as the regular army killed over a million innocent people, many Jews, as alleged partisans in Russia

      But I am sure you will find some little factoid and case which you will vainly cling to, like a drowning man to straw, to defend your lie. I won’t ever say Hitler was a good Catholic or he ever claimed he was acting on behalf of the Church, but never did he renounce his traditional faith he was brought up as, So save your lies for other stupid sleazy Catholics like all the Italian bigots and arseheads around me.

      • Russian-German alliance / Oct 25 2013 2:02 pm

        @ Jonas Pell
        Basically , what you mean to say is that you trained hard for the year idiot contest. Congratulations , you have a good chance to win the prize each year. 

        So what about the pact he made with the atheists/communists in August 1939 ? 

        «During his meeting with Ribbentrop, Stalin promised him to get rid of the “Jewish domination”, especially among intellectuals.[18] After dismissing Maxim Litvinov as Foreign Minister in 1939,[19] Stalin immediately directed incoming Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov to “purge the ministry of Jews”, to appease Hitler and to signal Nazi Germany that the USSR was ready for non-aggression talks.[19][20][21][22]
        According to some historians, antisemitic trends in the Kremlin’s policies could be fueled by the exile of Leon Trotsky.[23][24]
        In the late 1930s, 1940s, and 1950s far fewer Jews were appointed to positions of power in the state apparatus than previously, with a sharp drop in Jewish representation in senior positions evident from around the time of the beginning of the late 1930s rapproachment with Nazi Germany. The percentage of Jews in positions of power dropped to 6% in 1938, and to 5% in 1940.[20] »

         

        During this two-year alliance, the atheists/communists helped him to consolidate his power in Europe. They fought the nazis just because Hitler broke the pact else the most atheistic country of this time would probably still implicitly support the racial theories. 

        Also it looks like many Jewish know that nazism is based on scientific racism dear to atheism likewise eugenics and social-Darwinism …
        According to many Jewish sources, the nazis killed much more Christians than barbers. 

        http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Bormann.html

        «He reopened the fight against the Christian churches, declaring in a confidential memo to Gauleiters in 1942 that their power ‘must absolutely and finally be broken.’ Nazism, based as it was on a ‘scientific’ world-view, was
         completely incompatible with Christianity
         whose influence was regarded by Bormann as a serious obstacle to totalitarian rule. The sharpest anti-cleric in the Nazi leadership (he collected all the files of cases against the clergy that he could lay his hands on), Bormann was the driving force of the Kirchenkampf, which Hitler for tactical reasons had wished to postpone until after the war.»

      • Rest In Peace / Oct 26 2013 12:47 am

        @ jonas pell

         The Wehrmacht killed or let die in horrible conditions over FOUR MILLION SOVIET POWs  

        OMG , atheists signed a pact then killed one another ! Lol, I just don’t give a damn.
        Maybe you should learn that the USSR was opposed to the Geneva convention which protect POWs.

      • jonas pell / Oct 26 2013 9:46 pm

        You are not only intellectually inferior to me, but morally too, since like most Catholics I ever known, you can’t tell the difference between the cold truth and your wishful thinking. First off, the Nazi Soviet pact was one of the most cynical deals ever made. Second, I revile the Soviets just as much as the Nazis
        Third, you lying little Catholic pig of a bigot, The Nazis merely put a pseudo Scientific spin on the age old religious Anti-semitism cesspools like the Vatican, Lutherans or the ROC preached. Darwin and his theories had nothing to say about Jews nor did he advocate any sort of genocide, contrary to what some low class lying piles of theocon trash insinuated Furthermore, Hitler banned the works of Darwin. How many true antisemites then had any real understanding of Darwin, like 10?

        But nowhere did you attempt to refute that many practicing Catholics and Catholic countries and other Christian countries were eager allies of the Nazis. You are such a gutless Catholic hypocrite that you won’t even touch the very Catholic Romanian or Croatian participation in the Holocaust. As a cap to your “Catholics as Nazi Victims” lie is that the Germans occupied Rome for nine months but left the Vatican alone. Then the same greasy Catholic hypocrites in the Vatican helped wanted Nazi war criminals escape justice. Such odd behavior by and for a group of people who hated Catholics so much!

        Furthermore, Catholics themselves have actively created their own atrocities, like the mass murder committed in the New World by good Catholic countries like Spain & Portugal Never mind the Spanish Inquisition & the Expulsion of the Jews/Moors from Spain, Then we can move to the Counter Reformation where Catholics showed their true humanity towards the Protestants. Not that the Prots were much better. To cap this off, remember the mass murder of the Jews inflicted by the verminous Catholic hordes in both Europe and the Holy Land that happened during the Vatican instigated Crusades.

        I realize that when they wanted to make Little Hitlerjugend Ratzo pope, the Vati-cons went all out telling everyone just what victims the Catholics were and just how anti-Nazi our intrepid little Pope was when he was a kid. Yeah, his intrepid anti-Nazi actions consisted of nothing more than bad thoughts and some anti-Hitler slurs made over the dinner table. Personally, I can’t indict someone as a Nazi accessory when he was all of 2 when Hitler took power. But being devout Catholics, why did not Ratzo and his family get tossed into the camps if your lie was true? Why wasn’t the Croatian RC Church even criticized by the Vatican for their heinous genocidal mass murder and Nazi Collaboration? Please explain this to me, because according to some sleazebags, the RCC was more active than the French Resistance or even the Serbian Partisan in fighting Nazis; when Hitler the Catholic never even renounced his faith. At least the Soviets were honest about their atheism and religious hatred.

      • Правда / Oct 27 2013 12:06 am

        @ jonas pell

         First off, the Nazi Soviet pact was one of the most cynical deals ever made.  

        Who cares how cynical it was ? Who said it was not ? They did it and the atheists/commies remained faithful to Hitler until he changed his mind , invaded Russia and finally killed in horrible conditions (these are your words , not mines) over FOUR MILLION POWs who helped him to exterminate polish Jewish, priests etc… (Those who where not POWs in 1945 were raping German women by thousands and even raped many women they “freed” in concentration camps.)
        You can deny this fact if you fancy, but I once again speak the truth you tried to avoid. 

        The good point for you is that you feel morally and intellectually superior (I’m not surprised at all, atheists are narcissistic) but you read and write that I’m a Catholic just because I spoke the truth about the priests and nuns exterminated by Hitler’s troops. Lol, I don’t know much about this religion. Next time , you will assert I’m a Jewish or a Pole because I told you that I hate the nazis ? You should first try to read properly , perhaps it’s the reason why you haven’t noticed that my comments are linked to historian conclusions who thoroughly vetted Hitler’s own words.  

        Like this one :

        – Extract from Hitler a Study in Tyranny, by Alan Bullock :
         
        In Hitler’s eyes, Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves; he detested its ethics in particular. Its teaching, he declared, was a rebellion against the natural law of selection by struggle and the survival of the fittest.
         

        That’s the truth you hate to see.
        Lol , historians have tons of quotes like this one. Ignore them but the truth remains the truth. 

        You know what , now I feel superior to you because I have no need to insult you …because truth is my ally and definitely your nightmare for a long time. 

      • jonas pell / Oct 26 2013 9:51 pm

        Rest In Peace,
        Glad you have so much humanity & concern for your fellow people that you are okay with mass murder of POWs and civilians and Jews by the German army, usually under the ruse of anti-partisan warfare, because the Red government didn’t sign a slip a paper. I know that you are a hateful barbarian who thinks it is okay to kill atheists, but lots of those victims weren’t atheists. So much for your religious guilt and humanity, lol

      • Dog eat dog / Oct 27 2013 1:50 am

        @ jonas pell

        As if the Reds did not let die civilians and POWs by millions …
        Plus, Stalin did not need the nazis to kill his own soldiers : he exterminated his officers (most of them Christians) during the Great Purge just before the war …and his soldiers exterminated Poles along with Hitler’s ones in 1940. 
        The atheist record in human rights is so miserable that your concern for human kind sounds like a vulgar joke. 
        I only feel guilt when I do something wrong especially if I offend an innocent person.
        I don’t feel guilty to say that the communist POWs were criminals who helped Hitler to exterminate Jewish, Gypsies and Christians … Should I cry for the commies and nazis ? The nazi/ communist relationship it’s dog eat dog ! So they both had what they deserved. 

      • jonas pell / Oct 27 2013 1:03 pm

        Правда,
        so it’s okay when you and the rest of the hateful religious pigs here spew vileness on atheists and call them subhumans, I guess? Yet you have the gall to complain when I throw your trash right back into your face, you low class religious bully. First off, brutish lying religious pig, I am not defending the Communists, but that wasn’t he point here anyways. Second, if Hitler was so into killing Catholics, why didn’t he just annihilate the whole Vatican when his forces occupied Rome? Furthermore, you gutless degenerate, you have tailed to formulate any rational explanation for the vile behavior all the good Catholics, such as the Ustashi, Hungarians, Romanians or other Catholic and Orthodox allies who eagerly served the allegedly Christian hating Nazis in all phases of the Nazi plans. Nor can you explain why the Churches in Germany by and large stood by Hitler to the end? Oh right, they protested killing the cripples before the war, but killing Jews, Slavs or Red POWs, not a whisper. Your precious Vatican knew about the Holocaust, yet failed to tell the rest of the world, People like you occupy the moral swamps, not high ground

        Most religious people, as well as most atheists,are decent people, But you and the rest of the RW pigs here are complete piles of hateful brutish trash. Your religions serves the exact same purpose as the deodorizer in a public restroom. What a liar like you calls the TRUTH, I call propaganda. I doubt that your religion is much more than going to Church 3X a year and saying Merry Xmas rather than Happy Holidays anyways. I saw a sign in a methodist church that said “If going to Church makes you a Christian, does going to a garage make yuou a car?” True Xtians don’t demonize and denigrate Atheist, buit piggish brutes like you do. So please tell me, Mr, Shrink, who is the narcissist here?

        Finally, to show what utter liars and degenerates you all are, most of the real Anti-Islamic types in the USA are fundamentalist Xtians, So have a crappy day, degenerate! Being morally and intellectually superior to degenerate lying bullies like you all is hardly much of a self compliment on my behalf since I am comparing myself to the dregs of humanity.

    • jonas pell / Oct 27 2013 12:43 pm

      A brutal low class religious liar like you just needs to shut up. Most of the officers Stalin purged were good party members, not religious at all. Are you going to tell me Marshall Tuchachevky was some sort of holy roller? As well as most of the POWs and civilians murdered or let die by purposeful neglect by the not-Catholic-hating Nazis were just innocent people. Most of the POWs were just draftees ignorant and innocent of any Communist crimes, You are low class religious pig, just like all the low class Catholic bullies who used to torment me with their hateful Nazi inspired Jew hatred. If you are going to hold all atheists responsible for all the crimes of the Communists, then I will hold you and the rest of the religious scumbags here on this scheiss-blog accountable for every crime committed in the name of Xtianity or even by a Catholic leader. Is that fair? I hope so, because that is your degenerate logic thrown right back into your greasy hypocritical Christian face.

  20. AtheistHenk / Oct 22 2013 9:58 am

    Is this guy serious? How can someone think that religious people are smarter than atheists? Lol. Atheists are the ones that are thinking for themselves, instead of just accepting everything that was written in a book 2000 years ago. The funny thing is, in the US they did a test with atheists and Christians about bible knowledge. The outcome was that atheists know more about the Christian believe than the actual Christians do. That also makes perfect sense why most believers with high intelligence eventually become atheists. The best way to become an atheist is to carefully read a religious book like the bible or koran. One with high intelligence simply cannot accept that kind of bullcrap.

    • Atheism is the racists' religion / Oct 22 2013 3:56 pm

      Most atheists I met asserted :

      – Virgin Mary was a Catholic woman. 
      – Jesus was not a Semite.
      – Israel is a North African country and monotheism comes from Africa. That’s the reason why they say (like the nazis) atheism is the true European religion. 

      I have never heard such idiocies by the mouth of believers.

      • jonas pell / Oct 23 2013 2:45 pm

        Everything you posted is a lie. Where are you getting your so called data, out of your butt? Like most theocons, you are a smug, mean dishonest nobody. Who says Israel is in North Africa? Sorry but only a total lying POS calls atheism or Nazism a religion. And every Anti-semite I ever met was a low class Xtian, mainly Catholic pig too. Your opinion is rubbish

    • Ancient but true / Oct 22 2013 9:25 pm

      Have you heard something about Thales , Pythagorus or Archimedes ?
      They wrote very interesting things at the time the Bible was written too.
      I guess you have neither scientific nor historical background…

      • jonas pell / Oct 25 2013 3:39 am

        If the bible was really god’s words, how come it didn’t even contain the most up to date knowledge of those days, not even ours. Nor did god even bother to mention to his flock of sheep about Japan, China or the Mayans, Surely god knew about all the other places on earth.

  21. Desi / Oct 9 2013 8:44 am

    So, I am an Atheist,
    And i came here on the web to look for a debunking to the lie being spread,
    As you should know not all Atheists are liars or racists(In the same way that not all muslims are terrorists), infact the page that i just saw spreading this ‘Muslims rape swedens’ garbage , was the first i had ever come across.. And i instantly was disgusted and pointed it out.
    However,
    This page here (which i had hoped would provide adequate proof to debunk it, is also not a great source.. I am sure there are better sources out there then this..
    I also recommend any one who believes that gargantua load of bull (Muslims raping swedens) to seriously not be so damned gullible… And i am not defending Muslims in saying so,
    Because i do believe all religions are harmful.. but lets not make up or parrot on, without critically seeking information out first (How do you not already learn that when we know how easily people believe in religion without correctly researching it. Seriously. Same goes for my athiest brothers and sisters.. dont be so gullible.

    • Kim / Oct 9 2013 5:53 pm

      Atheist are liars and cheaters.

      • jonas pell / Oct 23 2013 2:47 pm

        And you are a liar and a self righteous ignorant person. Like most smug religious types. your self righteousness is only exceeded by your dishonesty

    • Leesey / Oct 11 2013 5:06 pm

      Ditto, thanks for saving me the text.

    • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 7:56 pm

      Since you are an atheist I don’t even consider you to be partially human, but fully subhuman.

      Everything here cited is from the official crime statistics published or news reports (except for the Swedish journalist’s claim that most reported rapes in Sweden are false).

      If you visit lots of atheist blog sites they claim that there’s lots of murder there, but the murder count and murder rate in Sweden has decreased beyond imagination and is the lowest in Sweden history since the 1960s/1970s, LOL

      • jonas pell / Oct 23 2013 2:50 pm

        I won’t generalize about all religius people based on one complete asshole’s comment, but you are a brutish., stupid self righteous pig who spews garbage. Your religion is the same as air freshness deodorizers they use in public restrooms. It hides the smell of your shit

  22. Thomas Marx / Oct 6 2013 7:38 pm

    You might be interested in the fact that Sweden was the first country in the world to have laws to protect the “Aryan Master Race” and together with Canada was one of the last countries to reedraw them – in 1976. http://www.economist.com/node/155244

    • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 10:34 pm

      Yeah they hate the US and many were Nazis in WWII.

      In 2010 SVP (an overtly Nazi party) gained power in Sweden, the first Nazi party to do so since WWII.

      • jonas pell / Oct 23 2013 2:52 pm

        And most Nazis started out as stupid self righteous Xtian trash like you. You spew lies and your low class opinion is rubbish too. The Vatican was good pals with the Nazis too

      • Dory / Oct 23 2013 5:28 pm

        On July 21, 1943, the nazis burned priests into a church in the village of Dory (Belarus). Isn’t it the typical atheistic strategy to intimidate believers ?
        Nazis were Christian-haters and close friends with the atheist/communists with whom they shared war resources to invade Poland , bomb Britain and many other Christian countries.

      • jonas pell / Oct 23 2013 6:02 pm

        Really Dory? Most Nazis started out as Christians & many remained as both. The Nazis occupied Rome for NINE MONTHS But left the Vatican alone. Pius X till the end tried to mediate a truce between his Nazi pals & the west so they could all fight the Reds .The Nazis approved of FOUR RELIGIONS: Calvinism, Lutheranism, Mormonism & Catholicism, Most Christian Churches approved of the Nazis at least at first, and the Lutheran Church became all but a but an appendage of Nazism in the end. Let’s not forget the Reich Vatican Concordant of 1935. The schitthole RCC knew all about the Holocaust from their agents in Poland but didn’t tell the world since your scumbag religious idols in the Vatican were more concerned about Stalin than Hitler, when they weren’t having gay sex or screwing nuns.

        Sure, in some cases, the Nazis killed Catholic priests, but as a whole, if the priests complied they left them alone. They also killed barbers too, does that mean they hated barbers and wanted everyone to have long hair

        I know it is pointless to attempt to reason with such smug stupid ignorant people like you and the hole who runs this latrine of a blog. You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts, You are too mentally and morally defective for me to argue with, since you don’t have the integrity to admit you are wrong

  23. spiritualrapist / Oct 4 2013 11:51 pm

    “When you see an atheist know that this person is a liar and a racist don’t trust them, they have already misled the world with their lies.”

    Here’s where you lost alllllll credibility in your ‘report’. You are just like the anti-muslims, you are anti-atheist. You are just as believable as them, and as unbelievable. :)

    Hope you accept my comment

    • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 10:33 pm

      I don’t pre-approve comments, although WordPress’s commenting system seems shitty and buggy.

      I wouldn’t have any problems with atheists if the atheist community would come out to oppose racism, but it’s never happened, and probably never will.

      I predict that by 2100-2200 once people accept evolution and natural selection different ethnic groups will be intentionally separated out in the world.

      • jonas pell / Oct 23 2013 2:59 pm

        Your prediction, like your opinions is worthless dishonest trash, which also matches the rest of your persona

  24. theBigM / Oct 3 2013 8:44 am

    We have a problem with gangs of pakistanis (muslims) in the UK abusing vulnerable white teenagers. There have been three recent high-profile cases of this. It’s difficult to know whether this is caused by their religious views or is a result of their culture and its backwards and medieval view of women. It depresses me that we have such people in our country.

    • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 8:15 pm

      The UK has an extremely low murder rate, so low that just one US state like Michigan has a higher murder count than the UK even though the UK has a population > 63 million and Michigan has a population < 10 million.

      But if you are talking about Pakistanis then you are probably right. As for why they act that way the hypothesis that the causal link is the ethnic group and not religion matches.

      The Muslims that are part of non-violent ethnic groups wouldn’t act that way.

      Religion doesn't seem to matter nearly as much as the ethnic group does, this is because the ethnic group determines your brain size and brain structure which in turn determines most of your behavior.

      Violent ethnic groups would remain violent regardless of if they are Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, atheist, Hindu, etc..
      Non-violent ethnic groups would remain non-violent regardless as well.

      Religion seems to only matter in a few conditions and has little effect on human behavior.

      The biggest factor involved in human behavior besides the ethnic group is early childhood development.

  25. jonas pell / Aug 20 2013 2:30 pm

    So according to this barely literate religious pig, atheists are the same as racists and both are stupid. Only someone who takes old books written 1000s of years ago by desert nomads seriously could say something so stupid

    • Virtual finger / Aug 21 2013 2:13 pm

      Atheists have no moral ; they’re as ignorant as narcissistic. They’re all two-face bastards.
      Noone can like them unless being a real asshole.

      • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 8:09 pm

        This is true.

        Estonia is the most atheistic country in the world according to multiple sources (2008 Gallup poll, 2005 Eurobarometer poll) and Estonia consistently has the highest or one of the highest murder rates in Europe year after year.

    • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 10:24 pm

      Well they kind of are, they both side with the Nazis, hate Jews, and hate Israel.

      – Tom Metzger founder of the Neo-nazi group White Aryan Resistance is an atheist
      – Larry Darby former state director of the extremely popular atheist group “American Atheists” is a holocaust denier
      – Atheists oppose Israel, so do Muslims
      – Atheists support Nazism, so do Muslims
      – Atheists view those fighting off Israel as ‘freedom fighters’, so do Muslims
      – Atheists side with Iran and al-Queda and view the US as the enemy, so do Muslims
      – Most Muslims seem to hate Jews, Zionism, and support Nazism just the same

      So we can clearly see that atheists and Muslims agree with each other on almost everything.

      Euclid’s books were written thousands of years ago it’s still used in mathematics today, the date something’s written isn’t really relevant.

      • jonas pell / Oct 23 2013 5:52 pm

        You are guilty of the worst examples of overgeneralizing and bigotry, You are a racist pig but you hate atheists as some stand in for your cheap, excuse for religion. Plenty of Christians hate Jews too, and Muslims are very religions and tend to hate Jews too.
        “So we can clearly see that atheists and Muslims agree with each other on almost everything.”
        That is such a lie, You are a stupid lying pile of trash, your opinion is too

  26. mikki / Aug 14 2013 4:12 pm

    You should convert to Islam, you seem to have the mysogyny down. I never thought I would take the Nazis side, but you are just not intelligent. When you let people into your country bc their country is not fair, or poor, they need to behave, Muslim or African, you are so silly. It’s the Muslims and Africans that are hurting the women, so your stupid deport all Muslims and bring Africans plan is so pointless. Norway should have no rapes by foreigners, stop patting Muslims on the back for not raping enough. I can’t type on my phone all that I want to point out but with all your math mistakes and stupid thinking, you just helped the white nationalists out. As an Asian woman, I just want to say thanks and fuck you for that. Answer honestly, how old are u, did u finish both school, what is your iq

    • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 8:51 pm

      lol, I don’t think so, I think I’m more intelligent than every atheist that’s existed just like how Newton was more intelligent than every atheist that’s ever existed.

      Norway had only 6 assault rapes, well 22 if you count the unidentified cases, the White non-Muslim who killed 77 people in Norway absolutely hated women.

      As for no rapes, that’s impossible if there’s a high rate of reporting and many false reports.

      If you think Norway should have no rapes by foreigners then you should also think that Norway should have no rapes from Whites too.

      I’m not defending the Muslims, but when watching violent rape cases on dateline I never saw one with a Muslim, I did see 1 with a male Asian who brutally beat up a White female with a belt so badly that it knocked her teeth out and left her badly wounded, the rest were from Africans, Hispanics, and Whites.

      The only violent Muslim rape case I ever heard about in the media was from Shelley Malil, who I think is a Muslim, though I’m uncertain.

      What math mistakes? I have a B.S. and will soon get a Master’s Degree. My IQ is above 150.

      Since you are Asian you are probably just mad that I pointed out the Asian rapist Ming Shiue and the Asian University shootings.

      But I don’t have a problem with Asians, I have many East Asian friends and a female atheist made fun of me for having many Asian friends.

      The atheists really hate Asians, especially male Asians.

      • jonas pell / Oct 23 2013 6:07 pm

        Regardless of religion or lack of it, I think you are one of the most dishonest, irrational, bigoted, illogical POS to ever run a blog. Dawkins or the late Chris Hitchens could reduce your mindless atheist hating diatribe to rubble in 30 seconds

    • Anonymous / Oct 12 2013 9:11 pm

      @ mikki

      I know many asian girls who are disgusted with all the white males who go in Asia to have sex with young child. It seems that you are not.
      The same white males consider the Asian girls living in Europe and Australia as bitches or whores , and are regularly physically harassed or at least morally harassed with obscene racist stereotypes. Just remember what the partner of the former Australian prime minister Gillard  (atheist) was saying publicly about Asian women :

      http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/29/julia-gillard-husband-prostate-doctor

      All white atheists I know consider Asian and African girls as sex slaves. If you don’t this, it’s because you surely not an Asian girl. 
      Most of the Asian girls living in Europe for example would be scared to complaint about rape or harassment made by a white male.

  27. oogenhand / Aug 14 2013 7:49 am

    Reblogged this on oogenhand and commented:
    Interesting discussion. Note his suggestion of importing non-white, non-muslim people. http://theantifeminist.com/angry-harry-incredible-rape-statistics/

    • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 10:10 pm

      Thanks, I hope they ban Muslims soon

      • jonas pell / Oct 23 2013 6:08 pm

        Coming from a guy who loves religion and accuses atheists of hating Muslims, your hypocrisy and bigotry is so welcome since it proves what a creep you are

  28. Golias / Jul 25 2013 12:04 am

    You are a complete idiot and insanely ignorant. Defending rape. Atheists ae the smartest people in their countries. Religion=stupidity.

    • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 9:15 pm

      I’m not defending rape, quite the contrary. The ones who are defending rape are the Westerners.

      If Westerners don’t consider non-violent “rapes” with no injuries to be a big deal for White males then why should I consider it to be a big deal for non-white males?

      This means it has nothing to do with the ‘act’ or ‘crime’ but the ethnicity of person doing the alleged crime.

      Atheist aren’t the smartest, they are the dumbest, Estonia (the most atheistic country) has 0 Nobel prizes where as Switzerland (the most religious Western country) has the most scientific Nobel prizes per capita (among nations with a population size above 1 million).

      Atheists think that science is just philosophical nonsense and a waste of time, and have already set back the progress of mankind so far beyond imagination.

      White atheists rank 12th in household income among other Whites proving that within the same ethnic group the more religious are more intelligent.

      The other fake stats atheists cite are distortions based upon using the trick of comparing IQs in different ethnic groups.

      It’s been shown throughout history that within the same ethnic group the more religious are more intelligent.

      Newton is more intelligent than every atheist that’s existed, definitely smarter than Einstein and other so-called geniuses, he wrote more on Biblical scripture than he did on science, and was much more religious than all of the other scientists during his era.

      In modern times Christopher Langan has one of highest tested adult IQs in history, and he’s also more religious.

      Atheists never contributed anything relevant to modern society except for things that come by luck and chance or a stolen.

      Atheists should just realize that they are less intelligent than Theists are overall and should give up and go home.

  29. itsnobody / Jun 17 2013 10:14 pm

    People have to realize what atheists are trying to do society before it’s too late.

    I use to be on this same anti-Islam bandwagon until I figured out that I was just tricked, sometime just prior to in 2011. I’m not a Muslim and never have been, they just accuse me of being a Muslim for criticizing atheists, some Swedes have exclusively said that I was a Jew.

    What Swedes want isn’t a non-Muslim society or non-African society or non-Asian society, it’s a White Swedish-only society, they’re just using Muslims to push their Nazi agenda. Anyone who objectively looks at things will find this to be true.

    Back in 1988 no one in Sweden supported SD or the Nazis (they got 0%), it’s only in 2010 that SD and SVP gained power.

    Things can never be the same.

    The Nazi/White Nationalist agenda is strong in 100% of all modern day atheist countries, and also in modern atheist US states like Maine.

    I mean Sweden is so racist that they think that Eastern Europeans are actually African.

    I know this because a Swede said to me “I’m not a racist, I have a friend who’s from Croatia”

    They think that Eastern Europeans are tall, athletic, can run fast, get into fights, are violent, loud, lazy, commit crimes and are actually the same as Africans.

    On another unrelated note recently Russian mobster Mani Chulpayev and a college basketball player have been accused of murdering the rapper Lil’ Phat – http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/in_focus&id=9120284/

    Some person (I think European) told me that “We don’t need Africans, we have Eastern Europeans”

    Can you believe that they think that Eastern Europeans are African?

    People have to wake up and realize what atheists/racists are trying to do society.

    I mean if it was just a joke like racist jokes in private or on TV or something I wouldn’t really care but the racism is really serious in atheist countries like Sweden, Denmark, New Zealand, etc..

    An atheist isn’t really anything to me, if I see an atheist just all of a sudden breakdown crying what I’m thinking in my mind is “What a great joy, what a great joy it is that this terrible low-life racist Nazi sympathizer is now crying, what a great joy, what a great joy”

    • William Wallace (@Infinite_Limit1) / Sep 20 2013 6:51 pm

      What’s wrong with a “white only Sweden”? It’s their native country. Don’t like, then move.

      • itsnobody / Oct 12 2013 8:03 pm

        Yeah well if they publicly announce it and make non-white immigration and citizenship there illegal I wouldn’t have any problem with it.

        I just have a problem with them being dishonest about it claiming that they just want a non-Muslim society or whatever.

        If they publicly announce it and are honest about it everyone would know and it would be easier for everyone, instead they have to lie and claim that they are anti-racist LOL

        I don’t want to visit or live in Sweden, ever, so I wouldn’t care that much.

        If they publicly announce that they want a “White Swedish only” type of society then people would know not to visit or live there, everything would be easier and better.

        Right now they are claiming that they want a “non-Muslim” society, so they get what they deserve, if with a 0% Muslim population the murder rate is 20 times higher, no one’s going to care, haha.

  30. James / May 5 2013 11:15 pm

    The issue isnt with Jews. It is the black West Indian and Africans, along with the Asian (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi) immigrants that are invevitably seeking welfare, pensions and medical services on the back of the taxpayers. They also find a gullible, dumb host country that they can effectively claim racism for a defence in rape, robberies and in the case of the Asians, scams. I have travelled extensively and found that all, absolutely all, Western countries that have allowed these people to immigrate have the exact same problems. These people use racism, multiculturalism and the benevolent legal systems to get away with horrendous crimes. The west must wake up before they are overwhelmed. You are allowing your daughters and wives to get assaulted and raped, the social system to be ripped off and soon, if not already, they will be enough of a voting block that your politicians wont have the guts to do anything.

    • itsnobody / Jun 12 2013 7:44 pm

      lol, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia are the European countries that have the least non-white immigration, lowest percentage of Muslims in Europe, and purest European stock, but have the highest murder rates in Europe and most crime in Europe

      So why don’t you make some videos or write some articles to help out Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia for (you don’t have to worry about Muslims or non-whites there)? (I’m sure you’ll NEVER EVER answer this question)

      The European countries with the very most non-white immigration have the very lowest murder rates in Europe, the European countries with the least non-white immigration have the very highest murder rates in Europe, the reason why you were unaware of this fact is because you’re just a stupid gullible person.

      All of the supposed ‘crime’ you’re talking about (non-violent rapes that result in no objective injuries) would be viewed as nothing and benign if White males were accused of doing the exact same things.

      The only White male crimes that might be viewed as bad are the ones that are very gruesome involving serious objective injuries or killings.

      Even the White male killings (like the Norwegian terrorist who killed 77) is viewed as a non-event in the White media, just imagine that.

      Non-white male non-violent non-child non-drug rapes (that result in no objective injuries) are talked about much more by Whites than the Norwegian White male who killed 77 people. Apparently other Whites just said “you know some times people become angry and do crazy things”, lol.

      The reason why you are a racist is because you are an atheist and from the UK, you are just a disgusting person, a low-life.

      The UK is full of disgusting people who like to blame all their problems on non-whites, they think that everybody owes them something to society and every time someone criticizes them they take everything seriously instead of trying to get ahead.

      I’m just glad that I live in the US which is obviously one of the least racist countries just because of the free market, free speech, and religion.

      Socialism and anti-immigration is the best choice for a Whites-only type of society, so I’m sure you support it.

      I actually support the anti-immigration people in a way, if it was up to me, I would deport/ban all non-whites (not just Muslims) from Europe or strongly encourage non-whites to voluntarily leave.

      A 0% non-white population would just cause the murder rate and suicide rate in Europe to soar up and Whites would just exterminate themselves.

      With a 0% non-white population, Europeans would just get bored and exterminate themselves.

      Most (if not all) of the countries that are closest to nationalist and have very low foreign populations have very high murder and/or suicide rates:
      – Japan, very high suicide rate (at least 25,000/year kill themselves there)
      – Lithuania (probably the purest homogeneous European country) has a very high intentional death rate (over 1,000 dead/year there which is a very high rate)
      – The European countries with the least non-white immigration (Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia) have the highest murder rates in Europe, and also relatively high suicide rates
      – China has a very high suicide rate (nearly 300,000/year kill themselves there)
      – South Korea has a very high suicide rate (around 15,000+/year kill themselves there)

      A 0% non-white population would just cause Whites to become bored, the police to become less strict, people to go out more and take more risks, and people to criticize and oppose crime less often, so crime would go up. Whites wouldn’t have much to talk about, so from boredom they would just exterminate themselves.

      The White population is already dieing out just because of extremely low White birth rates, with a 0% non-white population in Europe this would just cause the murder and/or suicide rates to go up and speed up the process of the White population dieing out.

      Yeah so I’m support them, I think a 0% non-white population in Europe would be good for exterminating the White population.

      Non-whites should just voluntarily leave Europe so Whites can kill themselves off.

      I’m sure you won’t answer my question as to why you won’t help out Latvia, Lithuania, or Estonia for, like a typical fool (atheist).

      I just hope I figure out a solution to this problem soon, I’m just hoping I have 10 years left (hoping I only need 3 or less).

      Sorry, but I win every time, I destroy all pro-White\atheist arguments, it’s just a joke.

      • Johney Cool / Jun 16 2013 2:40 am

        I hope you realize some day how stupid and backwards you are. As an American, it makes me so sad trash like yourself are coming here and trying to spread the disease known as islam. I cringed when you used the term “non-violent rape”, rape is always violent you moron, its force used against someone else violating their humanity. For an example, I’m going to firmly but gently tie you up and rape your ass, when you call the police i’ll say hey, it was non-violent fools.. This attitude is why muslims are a cancer and can never really live outside the hell hole they immigrated from. You actually believe raping your own wives and daughters is OK because muslims view them as cattle, not people. During the middle ages, Europe was all white and they killed each other all the time, yet all that did was lead to them colonizing the world, including all muslim lands who couldn’t defend themselves because they were stuck in caveman times (still are today). In fact, as a historian I know exactly how European culture operates, you should be aware.. a genocide is coming. Europe is a sleeping dog, it’s failing socialist economies combined with sub-human muslim immigrants killing and raping innocent people because they would rather follow sharia, its just the kick needed to wake it up.. The evidence suggests that you are the next jews (the difference being you deserve it with the way you behave), instead of being used as scapegoats, you’re just an obvious evil who will systematically be purged first. Just look at the Golden Dawn, The English Defense League, the rising support of Fascism in Italy.. even Germany’s right wing groups are constantly gaining supporters. France and Switzerland have already realized the mistake they made letting you worms in and are gradually getting you under control, but they’re only doing it with law until the rest of Europe wakes up. Then the human race can just hope India deals with it’s muslims problem and finally nukes mecca, America builds Walmarts over the ruble of destroyed mosques, and whats left of muslims will finally realize the psychotic ramblings of a violent, pedophile, war lord isn’t they best source of spiritual guidance and assimilate as real people.

        Oh and your data is wrong, you’re manipulating statistics (something stupid people do) to make yourself seem right. But of course you ignore the fact that violent European countries like Latvia or Estonia have been that way for decades due to poverty and corruption while also blatantly ignoring the fact that rape and and violence SKYROCKETED in Sweden just as muslim immigration was peaking (if you use real sources there’s an obvious correlation).

        Just remember.. Americans are far less tolerant than Europeans when it come to bullshit like honor killing, “non-violent” wife/daughter raping, or demands to live here but follow sharia. Everyone who lives here remembers 9/11, kids who witnessed it at an early age are young adults now, and we see you for the monsters you really are. Unlike Europeans, most Americans own guns and aren’t afraid to put a bullet in your face the second you start gang raping girls or rioting. Oh and guess what, our ultra diverse black/white/hispanic police will let it happen because we all deep down hate you people. We’re always watching you, we know never to trust you because only an amoral animal would do the things you people do and much of which you seem to think is at least semi-excusable. But oh well, keep your head buried in the sand faggot, I give islam 20-30 years before the beast is finally dead.. Unlike your prediction which is just stupid, there’s actual real evidence supporting this prediction and you would know about it by now but your too ignorant and brainwashed to bother, you’re going to see very soon that the jokes on you..

      • itsnobody / Jun 16 2013 9:10 am

        During the middle ages, Europe was all white and they killed each other all the time, yet all that did was lead to them colonizing the world, including all muslim lands who couldn’t defend themselves because they were stuck in caveman times (still are today). In fact, as a historian I know exactly how European culture operates, you should be aware.. a genocide is coming.

        As a historian you should know that most Muslim lands were far more developed than the other non-Western countries in the world during the Middle Ages.

        In modern times many Muslim countries are still more developed and ahead of other non-Western countries.

        In fact the only non-Western countries that can compete with Western countries for low murder rates are Muslim countries like Saudia Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, etc…and also some Asian countries like Japan and Hong Kong

        In modern times the most countries that are as developed as Western countries are the ones with no national defense or the ones built up by Westerners like many Caribbean countries, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, etc…Of course I don’t know what will happen in the future

        Why should I care if a genocide of Muslims is coming? I don’t have many Muslim friends, I’ve only known like 2 Muslims in my entire life here in the US.

        Europe is a sleeping dog, it’s failing socialist economies combined with sub-human muslim immigrants killing and raping innocent people because they would rather follow sharia, its just the kick needed to wake it up.. The evidence suggests that you are the next jews (the difference being you deserve it with the way you behave), instead of being used as scapegoats, you’re just an obvious evil who will systematically be purged first.

        You can’t be this stupid, I’m not a Muslim, and never have been, I’ve only known like 2 Muslims my entire life. I’ve had far more Jewish friends, they are nice people.

        The only reason liberal atheists like you accuse me of being a Jew or Muslim or whatever is because I criticize atheists for telling lies.

        If they’re raping and killing then why is the murder rate in the European countries with the highest Muslim populations the lowest in Europe (lower than each and every US state)? Go ahead explain please, I already provided the official crime statistics published.

        Here’s the link for Sweden – http://bra.se/bra/brott–statistik/mord-och-drap.html

        Oh and your data is wrong, you’re manipulating statistics (something stupid people do) to make yourself seem right.

        My data is 100% accurate, I encourage people to double-check, triple-check, or quadruple-check the statistics if they doubt me.

        How is it all wrong? Can you explain instead of just throwing personal attacks to make your invalid statements seem valid?

        But of course you ignore the fact that violent European countries like Latvia or Estonia have been that way for decades due to poverty and corruption while also blatantly ignoring the fact that rape and and violence SKYROCKETED in Sweden just as muslim immigration was peaking (if you use real sources there’s an obvious correlation).

        Oh…so you’re saying that if Whites do crime because of poverty and corruption it’s ok, but if non-whites don’t do crime it’s not ok? What a joke.

        As usual a low-life piece of shit White atheist like you just comes up with lame excuses for other Whites, but if it’s non-whites doing the killings there’s no excuses right?

        So you’ve already admitted that you don’t care about White non-Muslim killings, how sad, your dream in life seems to be end just Muslim-related crime, lol

        Rape and violence have NOT skyrocketed in Sweden, just the reported rape rate and reported amount of violence.

        In the crime statistics that are difficult to falsely report and don’t rely on the rate of reporting like the homicide rate and car theft rate the rate has decreased or remained constant in Sweden.

        If lethal violence has skyrocketed in Sweden, then please explain why the murder count in Sweden has decreased in 2012 to 68 for (a murder rate lower than each and every US state and almost every country in the entire world), and also why the reported number of homicides in 2009 was 232 but the actual was 92, and why over 100 of the reported homicides in Sweden 2009 were false reports?

        Please explain that one.

        There’s not even 1 US state with a lower murder rate than Sweden in 2012 but there’s more lethal violence there? What a joke.

        Basic logic tells us that the murder count would go up if there was more lethal violence in Sweden right? When people discuss lethal violence in countries like Honduras, El Salvador, Venezuela, etc…they mention the extremely high murder rates there not a a murder rate lower than each and every US state and almost every country.

        Honduras had a murder rate of like 91+ per 100,000 compared to Sweden’s 0.71 per 100,000 (in 2012).

        In Honduras (in 2012) there were more than 7,100 murders in a population of just 7.76 million compared with Sweden’s 68 murders in a population of 9.6 million.

        Honduras in 1 year had a higher murder count than Sweden did in a 60-year time period.

        I think Sweden should replace all it’s Muslim immigrants with Honduran immigrants, that would be a great experiment. Instead of talking about Sharia law and all this Muslim crap what would they be talking about then?

        The murder count in Sweden in 2012 has decreased and is lower than almost every other previous year in recorded Sweden history, if there’s more lethal violence why isn’t the murder count going up?

        For the murder count we know which ones are false reports and which ones are real, but for the reported rapes we don’t know which ones are real and which ones are false reports, right?

        Just remember.. Americans are far less tolerant than Europeans when it come to bullshit like honor killing, “non-violent” wife/daughter raping, or demands to live here but follow sharia. Everyone who lives here remembers 9/11, kids who witnessed it at an early age are young adults now, and we see you for the monsters you really are. Unlike Europeans, most Americans own guns and aren’t afraid to put a bullet in your face the second you start gang raping girls or rioting. Oh and guess what, our ultra diverse black/white/hispanic police will let it happen because we all deep down hate you people. We’re always watching you, we know never to trust you because only an amoral animal would do the things you people do and much of which you seem to think is at least semi-excusable.

        That’s not true, when it comes to non-violent adult non-celebrity White male rapes (that aren’t drug rapes, child rapes, result in no objective injuries and the accusers don’t have like 10 witnesses or video camera or picture evidence) no one can name even 1 White male rape case like that that’s ever become big news in the media, not even 1 case.

        I’m still waiting for someone to name a White male rape case like that that’s ever become national news or a big deal in the media.

        Since Westerners in general view women as nothing, and don’t consider adult White male non-violent rapes as a big deal, then I’ll intentionally not consider non-white male non-violent adult rapes as a big deal until the day Westerners consider it as a big deal for Whites.

        Honor killings? Well where are they? If they happen often then the murder rate would increase in the European countries with the highest Muslim populations (Austria, Denmark, Switzerland, Sweden, etc…) right?

        The European countries with the very highest Muslim populations have the very lowest murder rates in Europe and the entire world.

        I can point out all types of White males or females killing their families (wife/husband and kids) every year in the US, but these are viewed as isolated incidences that rarely occur (even though they occur every year).

        Here’s some that happened just so far just in 2013 this year in the US:
        – “Authorities in Pickens County, S.C., don’t know what drove Suzanna Simpson to murder her children, Sawyer 5, and Carly, 7, and try to kill her husband. She later told a nurse that she wanted to kill herself but ‘couldn’t do it.'” – http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/crazed-mom-opens-fire-family-killing-kids-5-7-article-1.1344654#ixzz2WNuvKbd7
        – “After allegedly gunning down his wife and two young daughters, Shane Franklin Miller drove 200 miles to the isolated Northern California…Miller is described as white, 5 feet 10 inches tall and about 200 pounds, with red hair and blue eyes” – http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jun/02/local/la-me-manhunt-20130603
        – “A shooting at a Kentucky condominium complex was carried out by a man who fatally shot his ex-girlfriend and their 8-year-old daughter, wounded his mother during a struggle and then killed himself, police said Thursday” – http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57590453-504083/kentucky-condo-shooting-man-kills-ex-girlfriend-eight-year-old-daughter-self-in-murder-suicide-cops-say/
        – “Investigators are trying to piece together a motive after a suburban man from the Chicago area allegedly killed his wife and two daughters before shooting himself in the mouth in an apparent triple murder-suicide” – http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/13/david-andrus-shooting_n_3436067.html

        Remember these are just merely some of the family killings that have occurred just so far JUST this year (up until June 2013) in the US, I think they should make a documentary “NOT on our honor” about all the non-honor family killings that occur each and every year in the US.

        Apparently it’s not big deal since it’s White non-Muslim non-honor killings or whatever, on the other hand if you point out some honor killings (like 3 that occurred in 5 years or whatever in the US) then it would be viewed as a frequent incidence that occurs all the time, there would be a big documentary about it, and all the other 50,000+ non-Muslim murders that occurred in the US in 5 years are just ignored, lol.

        I think 9/11 was terrible, what a shame that White terrorist attacks like the Norwegian terrorist, Timothy Mcveigh, Jim Jones, etc…aren’t viewed as badly nor are other non-Muslim killings that frequently occur every year in the US (resulting in more than 10,000 deaths/year) viewed as badly.

        But even though 9/11 was terrible that doesn’t mean we should ignore everything else going on in the world and focus on ending just Muslim-related crime alone or whatever.

        Everyone knows 9/11 wasn’t supposed to happen, I mean any group of physically weak people could stop some people with box cutters on an airplane, so I’m sure another 9/11 style attack won’t happen again.

        Terrorist attacks like 9/11 were easy to prevent and very rarely ever occur at all.
        On the other hand most of the non-Muslim killings that occur every year in the US are difficult to prevent and frequently occur (every year).

        Why should people be opposed only to Muslim-related killings?

        But oh well, keep your head buried in the sand faggot, I give islam 20-30 years before the beast is finally dead.. Unlike your prediction which is just stupid, there’s actual real evidence supporting this prediction and you would know about it by now but your too ignorant and brainwashed to bother, you’re going to see very soon that the jokes on you..

        I’ll give most religions around the world until around 2100 before they die off or radically change, but why should I care if Islam is dead or not?

        I already know the transient nature of things, how 10,000 years in comparison to the Earth’s lifespan is like nothing, and how some time from 2012-7138 a new heaven-like civilization on Earth will begin (but I’ll speak on that later).

        In the beginning it was religion that caused science to exist, now at a mid-point phase science seems to be pushing people away from religion, then in the future will be science which pushes people towards a type of religion. The truth can’t be suppressed and hidden for too long…

        Shameless false accusations, you know that I’m not a Muslim, not Arabic, not African, not Hispanic, not Asian, and don’t even have many Muslim friends? I only knew like 2 Muslims in my entire life in the US. I had 1 Muslim friend in Middle-school, and 1 in College.

        If you don’t believe that I’m a non-Muslim just research me, you’ll see I’m the one who posted the original video on YouTube that got more than half-a-million views defending Carlos Mencia when he was accused of stealing a joke (back in like 2007, you can check the date that the YouTube video was posted). But basically all Muslims absolutely hate Mencia, so how could I be a Muslim?

        This by itself automatically absolutely proves that I’m not a Muslim.

        Also most (if not all) Muslims seem to hate Jews and Israel, but I don’t, so how could I be a Muslim? I’ve known many more Jews than Muslims in my life and have many Jewish friends.

        Up until some time in 2011 I use to be on the same anti-Islam bandwagon as you and other your other atheist friends, thinking the same stuff as you were.

        Initially, just a few years ago I actually supported low-life liberal atheists like you, I thought in my mind the crime in the European countries with high Muslim populations was really bad until I looked closer at the crime statistics.

        Basic reasoning tells us that the murder count would go up if there was more lethal violence in these countries but the official crime statistics show that they are going down, which was surprising to me.

        I thought obviously if there’s more crime the murder rate would obviously be higher.

        After objectively looking at the crime statistics I realized that I was just tricked and fooled by Nazi liberal atheists like you. Atheists sure are expertly at telling lies, it’s something fun and enjoyable for them.

        It doesn’t matter to me if Islam is dead or not, I don’t really care.

        If Islam is dead and the region I’m living in has a 0% Muslim population, but the murder rate their is extremely high, how would I be better off? Why should I care if who’s doing the crime is Muslim or non-Muslim? I don’t get it.

        A White female friend of mine in the US was child-raped by a non-Muslim and had her mother killed by this same non-Muslim person, the person who did it was a non-Muslim Hispanic male (I think from El Salvador or Honduras), do you think the fact that the person who did it was non-Muslim helps her out at all?

        Can you or any other of your atheist friends explain why I should hop back on the anti-Islam bandwagon? Why should I oppose only Muslim-related crime alone for (even though the European countries with the highest Muslim populations have the very lowest murder rates), what about everything else going on in the world?

        How does opposing only Muslim-related crime (that doesn’t show up in the murder rate) and trying to stop Muslim-related crap help me out?

        Haven’t the fools (atheists) been saying that there’s more murder in the European countries with high Muslim populations? The bottom line is if there’s more lethal crime the murder rate and murder count would go up not go down and the crime statistics published show the murder count and murder rates as lower or constant.

        To myself an atheist isn’t really a human being, not even a subhuman being, it’s just like worse than a piece of shit.

        Atheists have repeatedly told so many lies and continue to do so, I’m just warning people not to trust the atheist kind, there’s just something enjoyable about telling lies to an atheist.

        My goal is to end all crime in general (not just Muslim related crime or whatever), and I’m not afraid of atheists, Nazis, Muslims, or anyone.

        Just look at all the websites and opposition in general towards all the supposed Muslim ‘crime’ in the European countries with the lowest murder rates in the world.

        Just imagine all the problems and lives that could’ve been saved if people viewed any crime in general the same way that you view all the alleged ‘crime’ in European countries with the highest Muslim populations (that have the lowest murder rates in the entire world, lol)

        It’s time for people to face the reality of the situation, that there are many threats facing us besides Muslims, that Muslims are not the only threat facing us, and are a minor threat in comparison to others.

        I still consider Muslims a threat, mainly because of Sharia law, isolated terrorist attacks, and countries like Pakistan, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan

  31. Mark King / Apr 4 2013 8:45 pm

    Whoever wrote this, you need to get out more, rather than sitting at home writing inflamatory rubbish about subjects you are clearly not mature enough to comprehend. You cite lots of statistics and then completely misinterpret what they mean, then turn the whole thing into an atheist-bashing rant. Sadly, your comments show you have very little understanding of the nature of rape and its effect on the people reporting these crimes. I can forgive the poster above for thinking your a 16 year old Muslim boy (at least, that’s what I thought), because you misrepresent the data your giving which either suggests, you have some agenda, or you’re a bit stupid.

    Although you start off using the rape-rate vs. murder-rate as an almost convincing argument (yes, the way they are reported makes them more or less subjective), you then spoil that by insisting that the murder rate would necessarily increase with the rape-rate. That is definitely NOT the case. Although both rape and murder are born out of hatred, a rapist is not necessarily born out of the same circumstances as a murderer (obviously some people commit both rape and murder, but they are a relatively tiny minority). The other post above is correct, the rape of somebody based on the rapist’s belief that their victim is inferior due to their cultural/ethnic background IS different to other rapes. It’s no better or worse – the effect on the poor person being raped is still horrendous. But if you’re posting about who/what to blame for these crimes you have to bear in mind the perpetrators’ cultural background because, obviously, if they’ve spent their whole lives being brought up to think a certain way about certain women it could make all the difference between being able to justify what they’re doing in their own minds, or not.

    Although I hate these awful right wing, racist groups, there’s an element of truth in what they are saying. Western muslims, in my experience, are brought up in a community where sex before marriage is prohibited, yet where utter contempt for western women and their behaviour is usually fostered. Obviously there are rapists of all races/religions, but the fact is, the vast majority of white westerners are brought up to think the sexes are equal, sex between consenting partners is great, and rape is totally wrong. Western muslims are brought up in very different circumstances. Here you have sexually frustrated young mysogynists prohibited from sex with girls from their own community, and yet surrounded by promiscuous girls from a supposedly inferior and wicked subclass. This is clearly a breeding ground for sexually motivated crime.

    You seemed determined from the outset to decide that Muslims were no more likely to commit rape than anyone else. What you don’t mention in your “statistics”, which undermines their credibility, are some of the other contributing factors, which seriously affect the reporting of these crimes.

    1. Which of the people reporting these crimes knew their attacker? What proportion of rapes go unreported? What kind of rapes go unreported (date-rapes, domestic rapes etc where the person knows their attackers identity?) Particularly important in relation to your Norway statistics where more cases had an unidentified attacker.

    2. How many of the people reporting these crimes in Sweden were reporting 300 rapes at a time? Really that many? If only one of them, for instance, was reporting multiple domestic rapes at the hands of their husband and all of the rest of the them were reporting individual incidences of rape, it would make your argument about the reporting methods being completely to blame for the spike in rapes look a bit stupid.

    3. Your comments on the numbers sound as if you are comparing like for like. You’re not. You can’t say, for example, that 3 in 4 rapes committed by whites (or whatever it was you said) shows that more whites commit rape than non-white when only a relatively tiny percentage of the population is non-white. Whichever western country you’re looking at, the percentage of muslims is very small compared to the non-muslim population. If , for example, only 1 in 50 people (2%) is a muslim, and somewhere up to half of those are women and children and probably won’t rape anyone, yet 1 in 4 rapes (25%) is committed by a muslim, this obviously would show that you’d completely missed the point of the statistics you were quoting, if you then tried to say rapists are no more common among muslims than non-muslims.

    4. Your coments seem to show you think Asians, Africans, Muslims etc are mutually exclusive groups. In fact most of the muslims where I live are from one of the countries of Asia.

    I do apologise for not bothering to scroll up and find the exact statistics you used – I must admit I ended up skim-reading some of what you wrote because it was obviously uninformed and also very badly written. When you’re a few years older (either mentally or physically) and have written something wortha more considered response, I will happily give it. If I were your teacher, and I were in a generous mood, you’d probably get an F for the content, and an F for the spelling, grammar, and punctuation. At least do the general public the courtesy of proof-reading the crap you write before you decide to air your confused views.

    If I’ve missed the point here and everything you’ve written was an attempt to write the most stupid and pointlessly argumentative rubbish possible to get more responses, I would suggest you give the Samaritans a call (or whatever similar organisation helps lonely and mentally fragile people in your country).

    To save you wasting your time on irrelavent rants:

    I am not an atheist. I am not a rapist. I do not follow any particular religion or belong to any political party or hold any particularly extreme political views on anything. I just chanced upon this site while looking for something else and thought your comments were stupid. Get a girlfriend and a job. I will never come back here, so if you ask any questions, please make them rhetorical and for the benfit of someone else.

    • itsnobody / Jun 9 2013 8:47 am

      Western muslims, in my experience, are brought up in a community where sex before marriage is prohibited, yet where utter contempt for western women and their behaviour is usually fostered. Obviously there are rapists of all races/religions, but the fact is, the vast majority of white westerners are brought up to think the sexes are equal, sex between consenting partners is great, and rape is totally wrong. Western muslims are brought up in very different circumstances.

      So you think it’s ok that Westerners were extremely sexist for thousands of years because they’ve only very very recently been merely claiming to view women as equals (since the mid-20th Century)?

      We could point out basically any Western country that was extremely sexist prior to the mid-20th Century, and in modern times most Western countries are extremely sexist even if they claim not to be.

      In my experience White males are extremely sexist and view women as nothing. They rape and kill women, they treat women as nothing and believe that they are are subordinate to men.

      The attitude that Western males have towards women can be demonstrated in the popular White male Rock/Rap group Beastie Boy’s lyrics:

      “Girls – to do the dishes
      Girls – to clean up my room
      Girls – to do the laundry
      Girls – and in the bathroom” – Beastie Boys, Girls

      The attitude Western males have towards women can also be seen in the popular White male Rock band Blink 182’s lyrics:

      “She’s a dove, she’s a fucking nightmare
      Unpredictable, it was my mistake to stay here
      On the go and it’s way too late to play
      I need a girl that I can train” – Blink 182, Dumpweed

      In modern times Westerners view females as like nothing, having different roles as men, and don’t consider non-violent White male rapes as anything.

      The Greeks were among the most sexist of all civilizations (much more sexist than Muslims were in the 8th Century), they executed women and viewed men as vastly superior, yet they are celebrated as a great rich Western society full of philosophy and knowledge.

      The vast majority of Western societies all around the world only started viewing woman as equals relatively recently in history (less than 100 years ago). There were some Native American societies that were much further ahead in woman’s rights than Western countries.

      So you think that Westerners are less sexist just because for an extremely short time period in history (just since the 20th Century) they’ve been claiming to be less sexist?

      So what about how sexist Western countries were just before?

      Western countries up until relatively recently (the 20th Century) viewed women as like nothing. For instance William Shakespeare is suspected to have been a female writer who pretended to be a male just to have the opportunity to write, the Westerners wouldn’t have accepted a female author.

      Einstein’s sexism was normal during his time period, he viewed women as subordinate to men, and thought that his wife should have no problem with him having many mistresses.

      During Einstein’s time females were intentionally ignored by the Nobel prize committees just because they were female

      In modern times, in most Western countries they don’t consider White male non-drug non-child rape cases that involve no objective injuries to be a big deal and it’s very difficult to get a conviction for a White male rape case that involved no objective injuries unless you have lots of witnesses or video camera or picture evidence.

      That’s why when I asked people to point out White male non-drug non-child rape cases where there was no objective injuries, the accusers didn’t have lots of witnesses, there was no video camera or picture evidence, and the person accused was not someone special in or had a celebrity status that ever became a big deal in any White country, no one could answer.

      In modern times, California’s rape laws only protect married women, see http://abcnews.go.com/US/calif-court-finds-single-woman-protected-rape-law/story?id=18132972#.Ubj8v6u7KAg.

      The simple fact is no one cares about White male non-drug non-child rape cases that result in no objective injuries.

      Even the Muslims were ahead of Western countries in woman’s rights for hundreds of years.

      Some of Muhammad’s pro-woman sayings:
      “Women are the twin halves of men”
      “God enjoins you to treat women well, for they are your mothers, daughters, aunts”
      “Whoever doeth good to women, it will be a curtain to him from hell-fire”
      “The acquisition of knowledge is a duty incumbent on every Muslim, male and female”
      “The rights of women are sacred. See that women are maintained in the rights assigned to them”

      Considering that Muhammad lived during the 6th-7th Centuries his pro-woman teachings were much further ahead of most other civilizations at the time.

      During the 6th-7th Century most Western countries and civilizations around the world were extremely sexist.

      I can find all types of unusually pro-woman teachings from Muhammad, but for most other religious teachers from other religions there are very few pro-woman teachings to be found.

      The vast majority of civilizations all around the world viewed women as lower, most of them were much worse than the Muslims were.

      In modern times China and India still have problems with female infanticide.

      It’s only been in relatively recent times that most countries all around the world (Muslim or not) have started viewing women as equals.

      Looks like your arguments are all ruined by the fact that Sweden has unique rape counting laws.

      1. It’s difficult to answer that question, it all depends on what the victim interprets as a ‘rape’, White females don’t really care that much about non-violent White male rapes, and in many cases don’t interpret it as a ‘rape’

      2. I don’t know how many, but the number of rape cases in 2009 was only 253, where as the reported number of ‘rapes’ was above 5,000, so that comes to around each female saying they were raped around 20-21 times by the perpetrator, which sounds right

      3. The only problem with this argument is that in the crime statistics that don’t rely upon the rate of reporting and are difficult to falsely report it’s mostly White males, so what’s your response to that? It’s probably 99% White males doing “non-violent rapes with no injuries”

      I mean if Whites reported White males 10 times less than Black males for a crime as objective as vandalizing a car in broad daylight (in an area where hundreds walk by), it’s probably 99% White males doing non-violent rapes realistically (but they go unreported, lol).

      4. Well a lot of Africans and Asians are Muslim, but a lot are not. Most East Asians are not Muslim.

      One of the worst rape cases in the US was from an Asian, Ming Sen Shiue (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ming_Sen_Shiue), but his case was much worse than most of the Muslim cases around the world since it involved serious injuries and also killings. He’s also one of the few people who stabbed his accuser while in court at his trial.

      Besides some rape-murder cases I’ve heard of, Ming Sen Shiue’s is probably the worst ever.

      Here’s a video documentary about what Ming Shiue did – http://www.hulu.com/abc-primetime , it’s truly one of the worst crimes I’ve ever heard about

      If I wanted to make Asians look bad it would be easy:
      – University of Iowa shooting
      – Cornell University shooting
      – University of Washington Medical Center shooting
      – Weber State University shooting
      – Simon’s Rock College of Bard shooting
      – Virginia Tech University shooting

      Do you think that we should label every Asian as some type of University shooter since Asians make up a low population in the US (like less than 5%) but have done so many University shootings?

      I can really make any group of people look bad if I wanted to.

      Sorry, but all of my points remain valid, where as yours just don’t make sense.

      The murder rate, Sweden’s new rape counting laws, and the number of rape cases basically destroys all of your points.

      White males do non-violent rapes all the time, but no one cares.

      Sorry but non-violent rapes with no objective injuries is a crime statistic that relies heavily upon the rate of reporting and is just about the very very easiest thing to falsely report.

      The reason why you don’t consider White male non-drug non-child rape cases that result in no objective injuries to be a big deal, but consider ‘Muslim’ or non-white male non-drug non-child rape cases that result in no objective injuries to be a big deal is because you’re a low-life and a disgusting person.

      It’s responses like yours that continually motivates me to get society to consider atheists\agnostics\non-religious as subhuman beings rather than as actual human beings.

      Since my statements are true, I win every time, fools

  32. Arronski (@Arronski) / Mar 12 2013 11:46 am

    I was trying to figure out how much credibility to give you as I read your arguments until I came to the part about New Zealand.
    I am a NZer (now living in Canada). I am from Auckland – the largest city with a sizable Asian population. My high-school was was something like 30% Asian. (Mostly Korean and Chinese.)
    None of my Asian friends have experienced having “hamburger meat” thrown at them (wtf???), and I have never witnessed it or even heard of it until I read this post.
    The worst Asian racism I’ve ever seen was perhaps people imitating them speaking in a mocking way when I was in high-school – kids will be kids. And the Asians – especially the Koreans – were more than willing to defend themselves. (Anyone who knows Koreans knows they don’t back down from a fight! They are tough.)
    In low socioeconomic areas there have been some Asian targeted assaults. But assaults/crime in such areas will of course be more prevalent in general. However I can assure you the vast majority of Asians in NZ have never experienced that sort of racism. They’re generally an accepted part of NZ society.

    Consider: if NZ is so terrible for Asians, why do they immigrate there in such large numbers? It’s not as if they’re desperate for asylum or anything like that.

    You are correct however about NZ women being promiscuous. NZ is a pioneer in women’s rights (first country to introduce women’s suffrage in 1893.) However this has a downside in that it creates extensive government support for single mothers which is clearly not a healthy direction for any country as the state replaces the father. (This is the case in maybe all the liberal democracies and a significant weakness of the system.)

    However be careful about hastily drawing conclusions about places and people you don’t have first hand experience with.

    • Arronski (@Arronski) / Mar 12 2013 11:49 am

      Oh and I’ve never heard of rapes being blamed on Asians… Asians are generally considered less inclined toward criminal behavior.

      • Arronski (@Arronski) / Mar 14 2013 2:08 pm

      • itsnobody / Jun 9 2013 9:15 am

        LOL!

        You can’t be this gullible and delusional.

        It’s one of the very most benign least gruesome cases of rape that I’ve ever heard of!

        It was so gruesome that the rape resulted in absolutely no objective injuries, LOL!

        This rape is about a 29-year-old female who was at a party and claimed that 11 men grabbed and raped her in a bedroom (so that there were no objective injuries leftover), the Nazi Swedish media turned it into “one of the most gruesome gang rapes ever”.

        The YouTube video is all wrong, there was no kidnapping or strange camp (I’m guessing the Nazi who posted the video never read about the actual case or that the woman modified her story since the DNA evidence was discovered in a bedroom at a complex, lol).

        Since the DNA evidence was discovered in a bedroom at a complex they can’t lie about the location that the alleged rape occurred in. I guess that’s one good thing about DNA evidence, it’s objective.

        Here’s the news story about it: http://www.thelocal.se/40208/20120411/

        “The woman, a 29-year-old mother of two, had been drinking beforehand at the party, which was held in a flat inhabited by asylum seekers.”

        By every objective measure it’s a very benign, non-gruesome rape:
        – The location that it occurred in was benign (in a bedroom at a complex)
        – The nature of rape was benign (resulted in absolutely no objective injuries)
        – The age of the alleged rapists and rape victim was benign (they were in their 20s)
        – The situation was benign (at a party drinking)

        What injuries tells us is how much physical force was involved.

        So how can anyone label this rape as ‘gruesome’ or ‘brutal’, lol?

        If we imagine that some 25-year-old White males were accused of the exact same thing Whites would probably react by defending the White males saying it was consensual or not a big deal since there was no injuries, if it was reported they would probably not be convicted, if they were convicted they might get a sentence of 2 weeks or less in jail, and no one would really care.

        I personally know that White males do ‘rapes’ like this all the time, because it was mentioned in the popular White male rock band Blink 182’s lyrics:

        “Where I’d put on some porn or have sex on the phone
        Far from people I hate down from anywhere state
        Trying to intoxicate girls to give them head after the party” – Blink 182, The Party Song

        White male rapper Eminem also rapped about it (who I refer to as Feminem):

        “Yo, look at her bush.. does it got hair? (Uh huh!)
        Fuck this bitch right here on the spot bare
        Til she passes out and she forgot how she got there” – Eminem, Guilty Conscience

        So I’m 100% certain that rapes like these happen often from White males, obviously since they are White males it goes unreported and if it is reported no one really cares about it. The exact same situation for White males is just viewed as like a joke.

        The only White male rape cases that the media pays attention to are ones with injuries, killings, drug rapes, child rapes, or ones with video camera or picture evidence, that’s it

        If White males were accused of doing this exact same thing, if it was reported here’s what the story would look like:
        “Some males slept with a woman at a party, the woman claims that she was raped, there were no objective injuries in the case and DNA evidence was found only in a bedroom. The alleged rape was indistinguishable from a consensual act”

        We know that there definitely wouldn’t be any YouTube video about it if White males were accused of doing the exact same thing (unless they had video or picture evidence), people would probably just laugh and not care about it since we know that countless White male gang-rapes that result in critical injuries don’t make big news or YouTube videos.

        This case is actually indistinguishable from a consensual act or a lie, but obviously in a country as extremely racist as Sweden no one would believe the males over the White Swedish female.

        What a joke, since when an event occurring at a party that resulted in no objective injuries a “gruesome rape”, lol.

        The Nazis in Sweden have been doing this “rape” joke game for a while, they know that they can’t falsely report say a murder or a car theft so instead they’ve been pointing out the most benign rape cases indistinguishable from consensual acts that rely heavily on the rate of reporting (these cases would all be interpreted as benign if it was White males accused but are interpreted as brutal and gruesome for non-white males, lol)

        I could easily point out about 10,000 more rape cases more brutal than this one, lol, like say the one with Ming Shuie

        I mean everyone knows that White females who go to parties a lot have probably been ‘raped’ (with no objective injuries) at a party before by some White males, but they probably never reported it or interpreted it as a ‘rape’.

        The Swedish police don’t even care about White male rape cases like that, the Nazis in Sweden claimed that since women enjoy sex rape isn’t a big deal. They actually ignore cases like this with White males or don’t take them seriously (I heard about one where a Swedish female claimed to have been raped by 2 White men and there’s was no injuries, of course no one called that a gruesome gang rape since they were White, and the woman dropped the charge).

        If White males were reported often for rapes like those 99% of the rape cases would probably be White males.

        White males get free passes even when they seriously injure people, a White male stabbed his girlfriend with a Samurai sword in Sweden and got a sentence of only 5 years, can you believe it?

        I wonder what would happen in if White males were accused of the exact same thing (and they didn’t have video camera evidence or 20 witnesses or something like that), I know here’s what the media would think: WHO CARES

        Here’s an example: The Wikileaks founder (a White male) was accused of rape in Sweden, but no one cared, and no cares today, people just responded by defending the White male and saying it had to do with Sweden’s rate of reporting rape and rape laws since it involved no injuries

        So which was more gruesome: The White male Wikileaks founder rape case or the Muslim Afghan ‘gang’ rape case that occurred at a party (both involved no objective injuries)?

        I wonder how many White females have had experiences like this with White males but never reported it.

        Here’s another example: A Lithuanian gang-rape (that resulted in critical injuries, http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/sunday-life/lithuanian-pair-wanted-in-gang-rape-case-28646322.html), so where’s the YouTube video about this truly gruesome gang rape (that actually resulted in injuries)? Oh wait I forgot they’re White, so even if there’s critical injuries, no one cares.

        Lithuania has the least non-white immigration, lowest percentage of Muslims in Europe, the purest European stock, and a murder rate around 9-10 times higher than Sweden’s. Since Lithuania’s murder rate is around 9-10 times higher their actual rape rate is probably much higher than Sweden’s (probably like 100 times higher).

        The Lithuanian gang-rape was definitely more gruesome than the rape in that YouTube video, so why doesn’t your White atheist kind make some YouTube videos to help out Lithuanians (Lithuania has among the lowest percentage of Muslims in the entire world and least non-white immigration in Europe so you don’t have to worry about Muslims or non-whites)?.

        I’m sure you won’t answer the question, because the truth is that if it’s White males (even if there’s critical injuries), NO ONE CARES.

        Here’s a Lithuanian rape with DNA evidence but no serious injuries: http://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/lithuanian-man-cleared-in-prostitute-rape-trial-358659.html , the Lithuanian man was cleared of all charges and the jury didn’t think of it as a big deal

        If White male rape cases that involve no objective injuries aren’t viewed as a big deal in Western countries, why should I consider non-white male rape cases that involve no objective injuries as a big deal? Can you answer that question for me?

        It’s only White and non-Muslim rape cases that involve serious injuries or killings that might become big news right?

        Isn’t this true?

        I’m still waiting for someone to answer this question: Which White male non-child non-drug rape case that involved no serious injuries, no video camera evidence, no pictures, no large number of witnesses, and the person accused was not a celebrity or someone special ever became a big deal in the media?

        Can anyone point out some?

        The only White (non-celebrity status) rape case I heard of that didn’t involve any injuries was a White male rape drug rapist who drugged raped like 30 women, he only got convicted on like the 3rd trial (on the other 2 trials the White jury didn’t believe the accusers since he was White, lol). They needed like 20 accusers to get a conviction, lol.

        Then the other White rape cases I’ve heard of involved objective injuries or killings like the Craigslist killer or David Gore, etc…

        Then the other White rape cases with no serious injuries that I’ve heard of were with famous people who had celebrity statuses

        Then there’s the Ohio rape case where 2 high school football players (1 White, 1 Black) were accused of rape, but they had video camera and picture evidence.

        It’s estimated that around 1 in 5 University students get sexually assaulted, of course White females wouldn’t really care to report it unless it became serious and involved injuries.

        I mean if Whites reported White males 10 times less than Black males for a crime as objective as vandalizing a car in broad daylight (in an area where hundreds walk by), it’s probably 99% White males doing non-violent rapes realistically (but they go unreported, lol).

        The simple fact is White males do lots of non-violent rapes that involve no injuries, but they don’t get reported, if they are reported they definitely won’t get convicted (unless there’s like 20 witnesses or video camera evidence, lol), and if they are convicted (and there’s no injuries) no one cares or considers it as a big deal isn’t it true?

      • itsnobody / Jun 9 2013 8:33 am

        So then how come in Norway 5 out of the 22 assault rapes in 2010 were from Asians (where as 3 were from Middle-Easterners, 9 from Africans, 5 Nordic)?

        There were 4 unidentified assault rapists who according to the Oslo police report looked Asian, usually when people say someone looks Asian they are referring to Oriental-looking people not to others who could be labeled as Asian (some Middle-Easterners and Indians).

        Since Oriental-looking people make up a lower population than Middle-Easterners do in Norway this means that they committed proportionally (and by count) more assault rapes than Middle-Easterners did.

        Most of the Africans in Norway are Christian Chaldeans, aren’t they?

        According to this definition of the Middle East (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_East), Middle-Easterners would include Somalians, Pakistanis, Afghanis, Egyptians, Iraqis, etc…and only 3 out of the 22 assault rapes were from Middle-Easterners

    • itsnobody / Jun 9 2013 10:25 am

      lol, sorry for your delusions, but every male Asian who lives in NZ talks about how racist it is.

      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10345507

      http://e2nz.org/whats-it-like-to-live-in-nz/vox-pop/chapter-1/new-zealand-is-turning-into-a-really-racist-country/

      http://bbs.chinadaily.com.cn/thread-689854-1-1.html

      http://www.3news.co.nz/Discrimination-against-Asians-in-New-Zealand-grows/tabid/423/articleID/92200/Default.aspx

      “I remember that I was just going for a walk with my cousin, when a car slowed down next to us, and the white New Zealand people in the car started yelling racist insults at us, and then, they threw a half-eaten hamburger which hit my cousin on his head.

      My cousin told me that the Chinese people normally always walk in a group of 4 or 5 people, because if a Chinese person walks alone, he is likely to be yelled at and to have rubbish thrown at him by the New Zealand people.”

      “The Chinese, Filipino and PI’s receive racist remarks on a regular basis yet funnily enough our English flatmate who have been in NZ the least amount of time is welcomed with opened arms.”

      As the atheist population goes up the racism in NZ goes up.

      I heard about a Japanese woman who was gang-raped in NZ (by White males), she never reported it, lol, White males do so many unreported crimes.

      The reason why you’re unaware of the racism in NZ is because in NZ they strongly discourage people from talking about and discussing racism, isn’t this true?

      Consider: if NZ is so terrible for Asians, why do they immigrate there in such large numbers? It’s not as if they’re desperate for asylum or anything like that.

      lol, you can’t be this delusional.

      Consider this: Was California in the US racist in the 1900s (there were lots of Asians immigrating there)?

      Using your reasoning , it must not have been that racist.

      Having people immigrate doesn’t mean that racism is non-existent or low at all.

  33. admin / Feb 1 2013 7:39 pm

    Muslim Nazi Collaborators inspired the holocaust – The Grand Mufti :

  34. admin / Feb 1 2013 7:38 pm

    Ahmed Huber recounted a conversation with Mohammad Amin al-Husseini: the Nazi ideology was an inspiration from Islam:

    http://islamonazism.wordpress.com/2012/11/24/ahmed-huber-recounted-a-conversation-he-had-with-mohammad-amin-al-husseini/

  35. Anonymous / Dec 8 2012 2:45 pm

    There are quotes from both sides saying nazis were christians and others saying they appealed to the occult and others they denied belief in a deity. However, their actions were comparable to how Jews had been treated by catholics and protestants for centuries (Martin Luther was very anti semitic). The nazis enemies were communists, jews, homosexuals, handicapped and gypsies. These were also the enemies of the vatican. The Ustashe who were allied with the Nazis were undoubtedly catholic and they were so brutal that the nazi officers complained to their superiors about being associated with them.

    • GreeenDiamond / Dec 8 2012 3:21 pm

      Although individual catholic bishops were open supporters(in some cases, enthusiastic supporters), The Holy Churches’ and the Pope’s association with and appeasement to Hitler and the Nazi’s is ultimately unknown. Among the appeasements, all Catholic priests in Germany were ordered by the Pope to swear aligence to the Nazi Government. What threats against the German Catholics in the population (they were 40% of Germany at the time, particularly in Bavaria and the rest of the south). It is known tht 2,700 christian ministers during the Nazi years. Of these, 2,700 ministers, 2,600 were Catholic priests. 2,000 of which are documented as to have been killed by the Nazi’s. Tht would be a minimum of 1,900 Catholic priest killed by Nazi’s. The bulk if which happened after the break down of the Pope’s co-operation with Hitler. So, to call the Nazi’s even Catholic Church Sympothizers would be a stretch of reason.

      • GreeenDiamond / Dec 8 2012 3:40 pm

        Sorry, tht should read tht it is known tht 2,700 christian ministers were interned during the Nazi years.

    • Yves / Apr 5 2013 9:45 am

      Communists were allied with nazis during half the Second World War. During those years, the nazis persecuted Christians ( Jehovah Witnesses , Catholics and Protestants ) . Most of the Gypsies and the handicapped they exterminated were Christians too. During the same time, Stalin persecuted Christians and Hitler never tried to save any Christian threatened by his atheist allied.

  36. Anonymous / Dec 6 2012 6:42 am

    Violence against Jews is mainly a muslim and christian activity. 6 million Jews were killed by the christian nazis of ww2, i believed they called them christ killers. Thanks for existing though, you make atheists look good, your a champ.

    PS If only one religious group could remain on earth I would hope it would be the Jewish people. They’re intelligent and educated at least. Christians are stupid and muslims are savage. Keep up the posts I will try to promote it for the both of us. God bless XD

    • itsnobody / Dec 8 2012 5:27 am

      Hi there,

      I don’t oppose violence against Jews only, I oppose all violence in general against all. We can really point out almost any group of people in the past murdering lots of people.

      But as for the Nazis being Christians you are completely wrong. During Hitler’s time Germany was an extremely religious Christian country so it would’ve been political suicide for the Nazis to openly oppose Christianity.

      Even during Hitler’s time when Germany had been an extremely religious Christian country:
      – Martin Bormann (a Nazi official nearly equivalent to Hitler in terms of power) said “National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable”

      http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/biography/Bormann.html

      – Alfred Rosenberg, the Nazi party philosopher in his 30-point program for the National Church stated:

    • The National Church is determined to exterminate foreign Christian faiths imported into Germany in the ill-omened year 800.
    • The National Church demands immediate cessation of the publishing and dissemination of the Bible.
    • The National Church will clear away from its altars all Crucifixes, Bibles and pictures of Saints.
    • (Shirer, William Lawrence (1990). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany. New York: Simon and Schuste)

      – The Nazis had to fight off Churches (as every historical source indicates)

      – If you talk to modern day Nazis like Tom Metzger they will also tell you about how much they hate and despise Christianity

      How are Christians stupid since Switzerland (one of the most religious countries in Europe) has more than 3 times as many scientific Nobel laureates than Israel does with a population size almost equal to Israel’s?

      The Swiss seem to be smarter than Jews.

      Switzerland is where the super-genius super-religious mathematician Leonhard Euler is from:
      “Since the fabric of the universe is most perfect and the work of a most wise Creator, nothing at all takes place in the universe in which some rule of maximum or minimum does not appear” – Leonhard Euler

      Euler published more than 900 papers and is the most prolific mathematician in history!

      I think in modern times most Muslim countries do have some savage laws, but the Muslims still contributed significantly to causing the scientific revolution (mostly by preserving Greek texts and importing some texts from India)

      I think there are many negative things about the Islamic religion, but we can point out many negative things about almost any religion, there are some positive things in Muhammad’s sayings like:
      “Do you love your Creator? Love your fellow-beings first”
      “Women are the twin halves of men”
      “Adhere to truth, for truth leads to good deeds and good deeds leads him who does them to paradise”
      “Who is the most favored of God? He from whom the greatest good cometh to His creatures”
      “They will enter the Garden of Bliss who have a true, pure, and merciful heart”
      “Ye will not enter paradise until ye have faith, and ye will not complete your faith until ye love one another”

      So if Muslims could give up on Sharia Law and terrorism and stuff I don’t think I would have much problem with them.

  • admin / Feb 1 2013 7:41 pm

    Jews were killed by the Nazi’s not because of Christianity, but because of Hitler’s inspiration from Islam. Jewish persecution is solely an invention by Islam for 1400 centuries, and a racist activity that seeks nothing else but to exterminate an innocent people. There was no animosity at all between Christians and jews for hundreds of years. It is Muslims who created that conflict worldwide.

  • Anonymous / Dec 6 2012 6:32 am

    This post is so stupid. Mentioning average new Zealand woman sleeps with average twenty guys. Lol. How evil, so much more evil than Muslims hate raping non Muslim women or Christians molesting their own children. As long as the women don’t consent it is okay, sex is more evil than rape according to theists. Lol they wander why they live in trailer parks and wear beer stained singlets while we wear suits and live in houses. Right wing Nazis is a synonym for conservative Christian. It’s in fact the sissy atheist liberals defending the sub humans in Sweden but then the loser who wrote this article obviously isn’t interested in facts after all he is a theist. Poor fellow is probably still a virgin, I’ve popped Muslim and Christian girls cherries. Get laid and you won’t worry so much about us atheists enjoying life while you write blogs on the internet.

  • Somalislayer / Dec 3 2012 11:24 am

    Your name speaksd for itself. You really are a nobody with no brain. Your statistics are a joke and if you said them to a real new zealander you would be smashed in the face and kicked like a dog on the ground. Maybe that happened to you, you angry sad little muslim cunt.

  • Anonymous / Oct 20 2012 1:37 am

    Islam is not a race, Fucking moron

  • AbdulWadood Muhammed / Aug 24 2012 2:51 pm

    Yet Islam still remains the most fastest growing religion. Is anybody aware of an area called small heath, it used to be a predominately Asian Asian Muslim area but a lot of white Muslims have been moving in (and also Somalians) :*)

  • itsnobody / Aug 12 2012 11:16 pm

    I’m still waiting for the atheists and others who side with the atheists to answer these questions:

    Why is Sweden’s rape rate with a 0% Muslim population still calculated as higher than New Zealand’s rape rate?

    If there were no Muslims in Sweden then Sweden’s rape rate would remain above New Zealand’s (which already has one of the highest rape rates in the world) in the same position.

    The worst rapist in Sweden was not a Muslim but a pure white Swede Thomas Quick who allegedly raped and murdered 30 men.

    If Muslims were really responsible for the rape in Sweden we should expect the rape rate to be extremely low with a 0% Muslim population, not remaining in the same position higher than New Zealand’s (another atheist country with a high rape rate).

    New Zealand’s rape rate is probably more real since NZ’s murder rate is much higher and NZ doesn’t have rape laws as radical as Sweden’s. But the people gang-raping in NZ are Europeans not Muslims.

    Why has the massive increase in the reported rape rate in Sweden had no effect on the murder rate and why has Sweden’s murder rate decreased significantly?

    If people are committing more crime would we expect the murder rate (the king of all crime statistics) to be higher, at least slightly higher, instead the latest data shows Sweden’s murder rate in 2011 as 0.86, the the very lowest murder rate in decades and one of the lowest in Sweden history, Sweden’s murder rate is now lower than every single US state except for 1 (source http://www.bra.se/bra/brott–statistik/mord-och-drap.html)

    Back in 1991 when Sweden had a much lower Muslim population the murder rate was at least 2 times higher.

    So we know from the murder rate that the type of reported “rapes” in Sweden must be non-violent rapes, so non-violent that they do not cause the murder rate to increase by even the slightest bit.

    Forcible rapes involve violence, so the type of “rapes” in Sweden must not be forcible rapes. How can you forcibly rape someone leaving no injuries or sign of force? I guess you could if you threatened them with a weapon or something like that, but the more type of these forcible rapes the higher the chance of violence, so we would still expect the murder rate to go up not go down.

    The type of serious non-violent rapes are usually drug rapes or child rapes, if it isn’t one of those then that type of “rape” is indistinguishable from a false report or consensual act.

    The murder rate gives us very objective data since it’s calculated by objective deaths rather than the number of reports like with the rape rate.

    We also know that the classic signs of a falsely reported rape are no injuries, no signs of force, and no DNA evidence. It’s extremely easy to falsely report a rape unlike with a murder which is very difficult if not impossible to falsely report.

    Why do Swedish journalists claim that most reported rapes in Sweden are false?

    “Most [Sweden] rape complaints are false. I base my conclusions on the hundreds of preliminary investigations and verdicts I’ve reviewed in my 30 years as a journalist.” – Ingrid Carlqvist, http://rixstep.com/2/1/20110701,00.shtml

    Why do most other Western countries that have a higher percentage of Muslims than Sweden have lower reported rape rates and why do atheist countries like New Zealand with a low percentage of Muslims have high rape rates?

    New Zealand’s rape rate is probably more real than Sweden’s since NZ doesn’t have Sweden’s unique rape laws. When Europeans are reported for rape the victim usually has injuries or is dead so we know it’s not a false report (unlike in the case of the Muslims in Sweden), just look at the case of the tourist who was raped and murdered by a white New Zealander Jason Frandi http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/7011875/Waimate-victim-had-throat-cut-police-say or Steven Ellis a white New Zealander who murdered and raped a woman http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/6099208/Rapist-murderer-jailed-19-years .

    Since Europeans will obviously be reported far less often in White racist atheist countries the reported rape rate doesn’t give us any objective data.

    In New Zealand if you’re a female you have to be very careful about walking home by yourself because you will have a high chance of getting raped. If the person who raped you was a White male then it will be harder to get a conviction since White males get a free pass more often.

    Switzerland has a higher percentage of Muslims than Sweden but Switzerland’s rape rate has decreased recently and is much lower than Sweden’s. Switzerland’s murder rate is also lower than Sweden’s.

    From these observations I’ve come to these conclusions:
    – Nazi Swedes modified the rape laws and started reporting rape more often to make it appear as if Muslims are raping in Sweden when in reality all that’s changed is Sweden’s rape laws and the rate of reporting rapes
    – Nazi Swedes are using Muslims as the easiest target to push nationalism since in modern times Muslims are the easiest target
    – Nazi Nationalist Swedes don’t care about deporting all Muslims and leaving non-Muslim non-whites, they want all non-whites out

    My advice for non-white Muslims in Sweden would be to just voluntarily leave Sweden. With Muslims their it only makes it easier for the Nazi’s in Sweden. If they didn’t have Muslims and had lots of non-white non-Muslims with more crime it would be much harder for them to push nationalism. Just look at New Zealand, they have Asians instead so they have a harder time pushing nationalism.

    If you’re a non-white Muslim who decides to stay in Sweden then you should probably setup a surveillance system to avoid being falsely reported for rape.

    “The [Swedish] woman later recanted her story about the alleged rape when she learned that a surveillance camera mounted in the taxi had recorded the couple leaving the vehicle without paying” – http://www.thelocal.se/14626/20080929/

    Some other notes:
    – Sweden’s rape laws were modified in 2005
    – Throughout history in extremely racist societies falsely reporting rapes were common
    – Racism and nationalism clearly provides a motive to falsely report rapes
    – The only crime statistic that’s changed dramatically in Sweden is the reported rape rate, the murder rate is much lower now
    – The reported rape rate counts cases dropped, not convicted, not found guilty, and is highly unreliable
    – Notice that when Nazi Norwegians and Swedes mention the Problem of Islam they intentionally leave out mentioning the murder rate, why is this? It’s because it’s lower
    – You can’t really falsely report a murder like how you can falsely report a rape, the Nazis in Norway were really disappointed when they found out that the Norwegian murderer turned out to be a white Norwegian and not an Islamic terrorist
    – The murder rate gives us objective data, the reported rape rate does not
    – Rape cases that involve no violence, injuries, DNA evidence, or sign of force are impossible to distinguish from a false report or a consensual act
    – It’s really easy to falsely report a rape and win the case, all you need to do is get multiple accusers to tell the same story, then you’ll easily win even if there’s no DNA evidence or injuries (if the person accused is a non-white male)
    – All the evidence clearly points towards the Nazis in Sweden simply using Muslims as the easiest target to push nationalism, they don’t care about ending Islam or whatever they care about deporting all non-whites

  • Lin Anderson / Aug 5 2012 3:32 pm

    I cannot imagine being as ignorant as the person who wrote this. I know this is kind of an old post – but still worth commenting on. This is plain stupidity. Your “conclusion” really should have something to do with your post. Even reading it and trying to pretend it isn’t all completely garbage – it is easy to note that the conclusion does not tie into the rest of the post. Now about everything else, well it is not written objectively. It is not objective at all. It is just full of hate. It is sad that there are humans like you around. How disgraseful to the human race. It is common fact that “rape” in a Muslim country is not the same as in Western society. We define spousal rape here – they do not. It is also a fact that in places where they kill you or disgrace you for being raped are going to have low rape numbers. This does not mean it is not happening. It means women are too scared to say anything about it. That is just plain sad. Your ignorance is pathetic.

  • Anonymous / Jul 1 2012 11:36 pm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics

    Which explanation is correct or if both contain truth, is debated politically in Sweden, what is known is that immigrants in Sweden are several times more likely to commit rape as opposed to a native Swede. [43]

    http://www.bra.se/download/18.cba82f7130f475a2f1800012697/2005_17_brottslighet_bland_personer_fodda_sverige_och_utlandet.pdf

    Just for itsnobody.

    I work for Tom Metzger at the Corvallis Water Treatment Plant, Corvallis Oregon. 1979 to 1984.
    Tom Metzger attended church every Sunday. I personally moved his belonging out of the house under police observation ( Supervisor had a house at the treatment plant site ). I know Tom was at church because of on-call duty at the plant on the weekend.
    Disclaimer : I was employed by City of Corvallis, Metzger was my supervisor not FRIEND.

  • Anonymous / Jul 1 2012 10:37 pm

    Exactly how did this become about atheists? New Zealand is not an atheist country, don’t even know why it is mentioned. More facts and less name calling would be helpful.

  • Oranje / Jun 28 2012 11:04 am

    Check out the below source the rapes in muslim countries is low in comparison to western countries http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics

  • Oranje / Jun 28 2012 10:51 am

    Check out the below source the rapes in muslim countries is low in comparison to western countries http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics and btw most crimes in western countries get unreported as well as some 3 world nations both muslim & non muslims like Pakistan , India , Bangladesh , somalia , srilanka.

  • Oranje / Jun 27 2012 5:04 pm

    What a bunch of crap that swedish media is coming up with more false reporting propaganda against the muslims and fools below buying into the lies. There is expotentialy more rape , molestation , sexual exploitation in western countries than there is in muslim countries in fact the crime in all areas is very low in comparision to western countries.

  • GreenDiamond / Apr 14 2012 3:10 pm

    As to your Norwegian police report link. https://www.politi.no/vedlegg/lokale_vedlegg/oslo/Vedlegg_1309.pdf

    It fails to seperate the “assualt rape” from the other rapes. Muslims are over represented in the “assualt” rape while Norwegians are represented in the Nöjes or recreation rapes as defined in other comment.

    The report does mention that 30% of all rapes are from African backgrounds. By African in Norway, this is the large group of North Africans (muslims) in Norway. Black Africans (other than mixed Somalian) is very rare.

    Add to that the 15% with middle eastern backgrounds. That gives you 45% of ALL Norwegian rapes are done by that tiny population of Muslim immagrants in Norway. WOW- Those muslims love raping atheist chicks, don’t they?! Muslims, are under reported in Domestic rapes cases,, certainly due to their high respect for women. So those 45% are not found their (I guess some women might be raped at home by their muslim husbands- of coarse, according to the Koran, a muslim man has the right to force sex on his wife, and it is not considered rape). So they don’t do domestic or nöjes rape– but they just love assault rape!

  • itsnobody / Mar 30 2012 2:09 am

    More questions for the foolish ones (atheists):

    – Why has the murder rate and total number of murders in Norway substantially decreased from 2000 to 2009? Is it because murder rates are nearly impossible to fake and rape rates easy to fake?

    Norway’s murder rate in 2000: 1.07
    Norway’s murder rate in 2009: 0.60

    This means Norway has one of the very lowest murder rates in the world, like the 5th lowest among the entire world.

    If these Muslims are committing so much rape and assault then why has the murder rate in Norway substantially decreased? Are the fools arguing that Muslims are committing so much assault, rape, and crime but just some how decided not to murder? That makes lots of sense, lol.

    If the assaults have gone up why has the murder rate and number of murders substantially decreased?

    The assaults and rapes in Norway must be so non-violent that they do not cause the murder rate or the total number of murders to increase.

    The murder rate is very objective and nearly impossible to fake so this simply indicates that what’s going on in Norway and Sweden is the rate of reporting rapes has increased and that it’s easier for Norwegians/Swedes to report non-Westerners (especially Middle Easterners).

    In other words all that’s increased is the rate of reporting rapes because of the atheism/racism in those countries.

    Falsely reporting rapes is easy.
    Falsely reporting murders is nearly impossible.

    Countries that actually have high rape rates like Lesotho and Trinidad also have high murder rates. Norway and Sweden on the other hand have some of the very lowest murder rates in the entire world but some of the highest rape rates.

    So I already know that racism has caused atheists/racists in Norway and Sweden to report rapes more. They modified their rape laws and started reporting rapes more to make it seem as if rapes increased to push Nazi/nationalism when in reality it hasn’t.

  • Roger Cole / Mar 16 2012 12:08 am

    This just seems to be an anti-atheist site. Why bother? It just looks silly to see to many people demonising atheists who are all different types of people. They just don’t believe a big man in the sky imagined them into existance because he so desparately needed someone to worship him. They don’t go raping anyone because of some “holy” book that tells them they are supposed to do so.

  • itsnobody / Mar 5 2012 12:39 am

    Here’s some questions for atheists/rapists in Sweden:
    – Where’s the factual report detailing the rapes?
    – What’s the reason that Sweden’s rape rate has risen dramatically but Sweden’s murder rate has decreased slightly (Sweden has one of the lowest murder rates in the world)? All the other countries that have rape rates above 30 have much higher murder rates than Sweden, how is this possible?

    Is it because murder rates are nearly impossible to fake and that rape rates are easy to fake?
    – What’s the reason that other atheist countries with low Muslim populations also have high rape rates?
    – If the Sweden Democrat’s figure of 48% of rapes being foreign in origin (not necessarily Muslim in origin) is true, then Sweden would have a rape rate very close to New Zealand’s with a 0% foreign population.

    So with a 0% foreign population Sweden’s rape rate is nearly the same as New Zealand’s, why is this?

    People just have to realize the truth: atheists have a tendency to rape.

  • GreenDiamond / Feb 28 2012 2:32 pm

    One explanation is that Sweden tracks rape differently. Take the example of a woman coming into the police station saying that she has just been raped by her exhusband. During questioning it is revieled that he had raped her about once a month for 2 years while they were married. Six more times after their divorce and once just now. In some countries a husband cannot rape his wife. He can do what he wants with her whenever he wants. So these don’t count as rape. In civilized countries it is a crime to force yourself onto a unwilling female and its a crime to have any type of sex with children (up to 15-18 years of age depending uponn the country). But in most countries, this woman’s story would only end up being reported as ONE rape, while in Sweden it would count as 31. Thus what is one rape in other countries is counted as 31 in Sweden. That is part of the explanation as to why Sweden’s rape rate is as high as it is compared to other countries.

    So, there are a bunch of males from Muslim countries running around assault (grave) raping blond girls because they think they have the right to rape the enemy. Plus, the more accurate reporting technique of the total rapes. Plus, the fact that Swedes have a high date rape rate because of the Swedish males and females going home together drunk at night and the woman wanting to stop things before the guy is ready to stop. Alcohol and lust is not a good combination in a Swedish male. They don’t understand that NO means NO. But they feel that “If you don’t want the geni to come out then don’t rub the bottle (lamp). Instead, the Swedish girls desperate need for attention and inability to hold her alcohol leads her home with him (his place or her’s). Very often the girl passes out and wakes up with clothing on wrong and a funny taste in her mouth (did I not meantion that Swedish men are not circumsized). She claims rape. The old Swedish law said that if a woman was too drunk to resist then she was not raped. This law changed a few years ago and the reports of this sort of crime skyrocketed. Prior to the new law, these rapes were occuring but woman were just told that it isn’t a crime so they went unreported. This new definition of law where drunkiness was no longer permission to have sex caused the number of rapes to increase by definition not in number. But we have seen an increase in the report of these types of rapes each year after the redefinition. That explains more of why Sweden has such a high rape rate.

    Do you need more?

  • Anonymous / Feb 16 2012 4:46 pm

    What the hell are you talking about? Muslim immigrants – or better, “refugees”, are mostly uncivilized, uneducated and they never want to integrate. Hell! You say you’re not liked in some place? So what? Get out of here! It’s quite obvious locals don’t wanna see your stupid prayers around and the way you treat your women (as animals, and local women too), for example. Your muslim people, them and only them are guilty for how people think of them. Stop spreading this bullshit about “poor discriminated muslims”. They should never had started what the had. Don’t like something? Get the hell out to some Iraq or whatever, burn cars on the streets… When you come to ANOTHER country, YOU HAVE TO adopt its culture. Not bring yours and try to spread it there. Or there’ll be another Hitler who this time will burn not Jews but muslims, and locals will be glad to execute orders.

  • markr1957 / Feb 6 2012 10:08 am

    So the increase in reported rapes in Sweden is due to false reports, so does this increase in false reports mean atheists are committing more false rapes? Is it that the increase in false rapes is due to a sudden and massive increase in the number of atheists in Sweden? What point are you attempting to make here?

    Not quite sure where or why Lesotho comes into your commentary, but is the high rate of rape there due to the 100% atheist popluation there? I’ve been led to believe by the statistics that Lesotho was predominantly Christian, but what would I know.

  • Abdul-Wadood Muwahid / Jan 30 2012 11:09 am

    why are muslims being blamed for rape in the first place, I never came across the shariah punishment for rape but im sure the rapist doesnt get away free.

    and its funny what some people have replied to this article, who said that if a women gets raped she gets punished, i hope you are not confusing the quran with the bible.

    Bible says: “A virgin who is raped must marry her rapist (if they are “found”)- (Deut 22:28-29) “if a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay the girl’s father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives” Deuteronomy 22:28-30

    please in future please ask me about islam not some next website

    personally rape has really gotten out of hand in europe, and i mean really out of hand, i remember going to a UK college and one student was talking about rape and some worker in the college, and i remember walking with him once along with another class mate and he was talking about rape again,

    http://salafimedia.com/muslimah/item/578-women-in-the-quraan-and-women-in-the-bible.html

  • Anonymous / Jan 18 2012 10:08 am

    There was study done in 2009 by the EU to determine if the increase in rape reports in Sweden was due to change in reporting and/or change in law. The report showed that this was not the case and that there simply was an increase in the number of rapes in Sweden during 1990 to 2008.

  • Anonymous / Jan 18 2012 6:35 am

    48% of reported rapes in Sweden are committed by Muslim immagrents. 85% of alll rape convictions are perpetrated by muslim immagrants and their Swedish born children. I don’t know…. seems kinda obvious to me that they are the ones doing it. But I guess that someone like you thinks that a woman who isn’t dressed the way you want women to dress is asking to be raped and it is her fault.

    Plus, Swedes are so racist then why are they bringing all of these non Swedes to Sweden. Your source for the number of Muslims in Sweden is based on a small sample size survey and the report states that it has a large margin of error. The official count by the Swedish government central statistis agency is 420,000 muslims. This number is confirmed by many other surveys.

  • itsnobody / Dec 29 2011 4:11 pm

    Getting Muslims to stop raping should be relatively easy since no mainstream form of Islam accepts rape as lawful.

    The best strategy for dealing with Muslims is just to get them to be more moderate.

    But I guess blaming Muslims is an excellent strategy Swedes can use knowing that so many different groups already hate Muslims. Based on my research most of the rape in Sweden just has to do with a change in rape laws, not with Muslims.

    I hope Sweden expels all Muslims so people can see how high the rape rate would be with a 0% Muslim population. You can already calculate what Sweden’s rape rate would be with a 0% Muslim population.

    On the other hand I don’t really know what I can do about getting atheists to stop raping. I know a few Muslims and none of them are rapists, I know lots of atheists and one of them is a rapist (but has never been reported).

    I don’t really know what society can do to get atheists to stop raping.

    The simple fact is atheists are uncivilized and are always out to rape.

  • Brian Ball (@mainestategop) / Dec 25 2011 1:29 am

    Well Well… Looks like more rape apologetics from the religion of peace. Why am I not surprised.

    Read the Koran and what it says about women. Also google what happens to women and boys who are raped. 100 lashes. A 4 year old died in pakistan because she was raped and they whipped her in accordince with the koran.

  • itsnobody / Nov 13 2011 9:28 pm

    The actual cause of the rape in Sweden is just the change in rape laws, false rape reports, and the atheist population.

    Sweden’s rape rate changed when Sweden’s rape laws changed in 2005 and people started reporting rapes more. That’s the main cause of Sweden’s high rape rates. Even a far-left liberal like Michael Moore was outraged by Sweden’s rape laws.

    http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=54379

    “In absolute numbers, the vast majority of the perpetrators of intimate-partner violence are ‘ordinary’ Swedish men.” (Ertürk)

    So even if we subtract all the Muslim rapes in Sweden, Sweden would still have a higher rape rate than New Zealand. So with a 0% Muslim population Sweden would still have a higher rape rate than New Zealand (which also has nearly no Muslims yet a high rape rate).

    In reality Sweden has a very low Muslim population. Swedes are among the most disgusting and racist people in the world. Atheists already hate Muslims, so they know they can blame all their problems on Muslims knowing that other groups will be so gullible as to join them in hatred. Swedes all know that if they say Muslims are the cause of all the rape and crime in Sweden it will be easy to get lots of groups to join in hatred and it would also support anti-immigrant nationalist parties in Sweden.

  • itsnobody / Oct 11 2011 9:42 am

    People have to realize what atheists/rapists are trying to do society before they take over other countries and regions.

    Even if Norway, Sweden and any other atheist/racist country had a 0% Muslim population they would still have extremely high rape rates.

    The atheists’ only argument is that only some select Muslim immigrants who go to atheist/racist countries are raping but for some reason all the Muslim immigrants in non-atheist/racist countries aren’t raping nearly as much. This of course makes no sense.

    Muslim populations only cause racists/atheists to report rape more often. It’s much easier for a racist/atheist to report a Muslim of rape than a Nordic.

    We have seen other atheist countries like NZ that have nearly no Muslims still have extraordinarily high rape rates.

    I’m sure if NZ had a high Muslim population Muslims would easily be blamed.

    Atheists as a whole are just plain terrible people.

  • Misdreavus / Oct 10 2011 1:18 am

    You are a fool who lacks even a basic understanding of statistics. Your comparison only works if Muslims in New Zealand, Sweden, and Switzerland each come from a random sample of men and women from Islamic countries.

    Clearly, this is not the case — New Zealand has extremely stringent criteria for foreign immigrants of all stripes, especially Muslims, and Switzerland has even stricter requirements, which ensures that Muslims from both countries are not only educated but far more liberal than average.

    Sweden, on the other hand, accepts Muslim refugees straight from the ruins of Mogadishu and Tikrit. The epidemic of rape in Sweden directly coincides directly with the rise of immigration from Muslim nations. Sweden during the ’80s was one of the safest and most crime-free nations on Europe, and the sexual revolution had occurred decades prior in Scandinavia. (indeed, Sweden was one of the first countries to legalize contraception, sodomy, and no-fault divorce.) Clearly, the missing ingredient here is refugees who come from backward, patriarchical cultures where women are treated like filth and denied education.

    if not, why does a socially liberal country like Canada have such a lower rate of sexual assault? In fact, when all other variables are accounted for, sexual liberalization has a negative correlation with rape.

  • Trackbacks

    1. Splitting islamophobia from racism - Stormfront
    2. US crime figures: Why the drop? - Page 3 - Stormfront

    Post a Comment

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 46 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: